|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Institute of Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Medical Physiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
3 School of Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
4 The School of Human Movement Studies and Division of Physiotherapy, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: npetersen{at}ifi.ku.dk.
The central nervous system employs different strategies to execute specific motor tasks. Because afferent feedback during shortening and lengthening muscle contractions differs, the neural strategy underlying these tasks may be quite distinct. Cortical drive may be adjusted or afferent input regulated. The exact mechanisms are not clear. Here, we examine the control of synaptic transmission across the Ia synapse during shortening and lengthening muscle contractions. Subjects were instructed to maintain isolated activity in a single tibialis anterior (TA) motor unit while muscle length was varied from flexion to extension and back. At a fixed interval after a firing of the active motor unit, a single electrical stimulus was applied to the common peroneal nerve to activate Ia afferents from the TA muscle. We investigated the stimulus-induced change in firing probability of 19 individual low threshold TA motor units during shortening and lengthening contractions. Any change in firing probability depends on both pre- and post-synaptic mechanisms. In this experiment motoneurone firing rate was kept constant during both contraction types. There was no difference in the firing probability between shortening and lengthening contractions (0.21 ± 0.02 and 0.19 ± 0.02, respectively). We suggest that there is no contraction type specific control of Ia input to the motoneurones during shortening and lengthening muscle contractions. Cortical adjustments may have occurred.|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Duchateau and R. M. Enoka Neural control of shortening and lengthening contractions: influence of task constraints J. Physiol., December 15, 2008; 586(24): 5853 - 5864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |