Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (July 5, 2002). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00358.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/4/1345    most recent
00358.2002v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Umemura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Umemura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, A.

Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print July 5, 2002
J Appl Physiol, 10.1152/jap.00358.2002
Submitted on April 23, 2002
Accepted on June 27, 2002

Effects of intervals between jumps or bouts on osteogenic response to loading

Yoshihisa Umemura1*, Naota Sogo1, and Akiko Honda1

1 School of Health and Sport Sciences, Chukyo University, Toyota, Aichi, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: yumemura{at}sass.chukyo-u.ac.jp.

It was reported that prolonged loading repetitions diminished the mechanosensitivity of bones, and that loading interval might restore sensitivity. This study was designed to investigate the effects of intervals between loadings or bouts on osteogenic response. Forty female Fisher 344 rats aged 5 weeks were divided into a control group and three exercise groups; 20 jumps in a single bout with a 3-second (S3) or 30-second (S30) jump interval, or 20 jumps in two bouts (10 x 2) separated by a 6 hr interval with a 3-second jump interval (D3). After 8 weeks of training, the bone masses per body weight of the femur and tibia were significantly greater in the three exercise groups than in the control group, and were also greater in S30 than in S3, although these were at the same level in D3 and S3. These data suggest that a longer interval (30s) between individual loading had more effective anabolic effects on bone than a shorter interval (3s).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
Y. Umemura, S. Nagasawa, N. Sogo, and A. Honda
Effects of jump training on bone are preserved after detraining, regardless of estrogen secretion state in rats
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2008; 104(4): 1116 - 1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. Srinivasan, B. J. Ausk, S. L. Poliachik, S. E. Warner, T. S. Richardson, and T. S. Gross
Rest-inserted loading rapidly amplifies the response of bone to small increases in strain and load cycles
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2007; 102(5): 1945 - 1952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
R A Santos-Rocha, C S Oliveira, A P Veloso, M Espanha, and R Dyson
Osteogenic index of step exercise depending on choreographic movements, session duration, and stepping rate * COMMENTARY * COMMENTARY
Br. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2006; 40(10): 860 - 866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. Kato, T. Terashima, T. Yamashita, Y. Hatanaka, A. Honda, and Y. Umemura
Effect of low-repetition jump training on bone mineral density in young women
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2006; 100(3): 839 - 843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. M. Welch, C. M. Weaver, and C. H. Turner
Adaptations to free-fall impact are different in the shafts and bone ends of rat forelimbs
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2004; 97(5): 1859 - 1865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. Honda, N. Sogo, S. Nagasawa, T. Shimizu, and Y. Umemura
High-impact exercise strengthens bone in osteopenic ovariectomized rats with the same outcome as Sham rats
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2003; 95(3): 1032 - 1037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.