Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 9, 2001). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00358.2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/3/1159    most recent
00358.2001v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moosavi, S. H
Right arrow Articles by Adams, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moosavi, S. H
Right arrow Articles by Adams, L.

Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print November 9, 2001
J Appl Physiol, 10.1152/jap.00358.2001
Submitted on April 17, 2001
Accepted on October 31, 2001

Repeat pairings of exercise and 'imperceptible' deadspace loading do not alter VE of subsequent exercise in man

Shakeeb H Moosavi1*, Abraham Guz1, and Lewis Adams1

1 Academic Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, Charing Cross Campus, London, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: smoosavi{at}hsph.harvard.edu.

We employed an associative learning paradigm to test the hypothesis that exercise hyperpnea in man arises from learned responses forged by prior experience. 12 subjects undertook a 'conditioning' and a 'non-conditioning' session on separate days with order of performance counterbalanced among subjects. In both sessions subjects performed repeated bouts of 6min treadmill exercise each separated by 5min rest. The only difference between sessions was that the second to penultimate runs of the conditioning session were all performed with added deadspace in the breathing circuit. Cardiorespiratory responses during the first and last runs (the 'control' and 'test' runs) were compared for each session. Steady state exercise PETCO2 was significantly lower (p=0.003) during test compared to control runs for both sessions (dropping by 1.8±2 and 1.4±3mmHg during conditioning and non-conditioning sessions respectively). This, and all other, test-control run differences tended to be greater during the first session performed regardless of session type. Our data provides no support for the hypothesis implicating associative learning processes in the ventilatory response to exercise in man.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
G. S. Mitchell and S. M. Johnson
Plasticity in Respiratory Motor Control: Invited Review: Neuroplasticity in respiratory motor control
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2003; 94(1): 358 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.