Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (July 19, 2007). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00299.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/3/1078    most recent
00299.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sahin-Yilmaz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Naclerio, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sahin-Yilmaz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Naclerio, R. M.
Submitted on March 16, 2007
Accepted on July 12, 2007

Familial Aggregation of Nasal Conditioning Capacity

Asli Sahin-Yilmaz1, Jayant M. Pinto1, Marcy deTineo1, Samy Elwany1, and Robert M. Naclerio1*

1 Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rnacleri{at}surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu.

In our previous studies on nasal conditioning, we observed a large variability among individuals to condition inspired air. Although we previously investigated various physiologic parameters (age, sex, nasal mucosal temperature, heart rate, blood pressure and nasal volume) that might underlie these differences, we have been unable to explain this variability. Many proteins and molecules are involved in water transport, which are under genetic control and could affect nasal conditioning. In this study, we hypothesized that familial factors may contribute to the differences in nasal conditioning capacity (NCC). We performed a prospective study of 47 sibling pairs. Cold dry air (CDA) was delivered to the nose and the total water gradient (TWG) was calculated to determine the NCC. We found a highly significant intraclass correlation of 0.53 (p<0.0001) between sibling pairs for the TWG. These results suggest that there is a familial basis for nasal conditioning and a large enough genetic component to search for genes explaining the observed correlation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.