Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 2, 2006). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00269.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/4/1380    most recent
00269.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sawyer, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, W. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sawyer, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, W. D
Submitted on March 1, 2006
Accepted on October 18, 2006

The Effect of Exercise on Nasal Uptake of Ozone in Healthy Human Adults

Keegan Sawyer1, James S Brown2, Milan J Hazucha1, and William D Bennett1*

1 Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma, and Lung Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
2 National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, RTP, North Carolina, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: william_bennett{at}med.unc.edu.

The nose may help protect the lower respiratory tract from the effects of ambient ozone by scrubbing ozone from inspired air. Reductions in both nasal resistance and nitric oxide production with exercise may influence the efficiency of ozone uptake in the nose. Nasal ozone uptake was measured in ten healthy volunteers before and after 15 minutes of moderate, bicycle exercise. Ozone (0.2ppm) was pulled through both nostrils and out of the mouth at a constant flow while the subject closed their epiglottis. Nasal uptake of ozone was determined by comparing the ozone concentration entering the nostrils to that exiting the mouth. Average pre-exercise uptake of ozone was 56% (± 7.8) and 37% (± 4.9) at 10 and 20 L/min, respectively. These averages did not significantly differ from those immediately post-exercise (55% and 37%). Nasal ozone uptake increased significantly (p < 0.001) with decreasing flow rate, but intersubject variability in uptake could not be predicted by nasal volume or cross-sectional areas (as measured by acoustic rhinometry), or endogenous nitric oxide production. However, the percent change in ozone uptake after exercise, within an individual, was correlated with both 1) percent change in nasal volume (r = 0.70 at 10 L/min) and 2) percent change in the rate of volumetric expansion between the nasal valve and turbinates (r = 0.82 at 10 L/min). These results may be useful for assessing human risk associated with ozone exposure during exercise.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.