|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering and Center for Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
2 Center for the Study of Health Effects of Exercise in Children and Children's Hospital, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ctakahas{at}uci.edu.
The motor system adapts to novel dynamic environments by forming internal models that predict the muscle forces needed to move skillfully. The goal of this study was to determine how muscle fatigue affects internal model formation during arm movement, and whether an internal model acquired while fatigued could be recalled accurately after rest. Twelve subjects adapted to a viscous force field applied by a lightweight robot as they reached to a target. They then reached while being resisted by elastic bands until they could no longer touch the target. This protocol reduced the strength of the muscles used to resist the force field by about 20%. The bands were removed, and subjects adapted again to the viscous force field. Their adaptive ability, quantified by the amount and time constant of adaptation, was not significantly impaired following fatigue. The subjects then rested, recovering about 70% of their lost force generation ability. When they reached in the force field again, their prediction of the force field strength was different than in a non-fatigued state. This alteration was consistent with the use of a higher level of effort than normally used to counteract the force field. These results suggest that recovery from fatigue can affect recall of an internal model, even when the fatigue did not substantially affect the motor system's ability to form the model. Recovery from fatigue apparently affects recall because the motor system represents internal models as a mapping between effort and movement, and relies on practice to re-calibrate this mapping.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Emken, R. Benitez, A. Sideris, J. E. Bobrow, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer Motor Adaptation as a Greedy Optimization of Error and Effort J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 3997 - 4006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Scheidt and T. Stoeckmann Reach Adaptation and Final Position Control Amid Environmental Uncertainty After Stroke J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2824 - 2836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |