Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (July 17, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00094.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/3/977    most recent
00094.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Corder, K.
Right arrow Articles by Brage, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Corder, K.
Right arrow Articles by Brage, S.
Submitted on January 29, 2008
Accepted on July 17, 2008

Assessment of physical activity in youth

Kirsten Corder1, Ulf Ekelund1, Rebekah M Steele1, Nicholas J Wareham1, and Soren Brage1*

1 MRC Epidemiology Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: soren.brage{at}mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk.

Despite much progress with physical activity assessment, the limitations concerning the accurate measurement of physical activity are often amplified in young people due to the cognitive, physiological, and biomechanical changes that occur during natural growth as well as a more intermittent pattern of habitual physical activity in youth compared to adults. This mini-review describes and compares methods to assess habitual physical activity in youth and discusses main issues regarding the use and interpretation of data collected with these techniques. Self-report instruments and movement sensing are currently the most frequently used methods for the assessment of physical activity in epidemiological research; others include heart rate monitoring and multi-sensor systems. Habitual energy expenditure can be estimated from these input measures with varying degree of uncertainty. Non-linear modeling techniques, using accelerometry perhaps in combination with physiological parameters like heart rate or temperature have the greatest potential for increasing the prediction accuracy of habitual physical activity energy expenditure. Although multi-sensor systems may be more accurate, this must be balanced against feasibility, a balance which shifts with technological and scientific advances and should be considered at the beginning of every new study.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. Corder, E. M. van Sluijs, A. Wright, P. Whincup, N. J Wareham, and U. Ekelund
Is it possible to assess free-living physical activity and energy expenditure in young people by self-report?
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2009; 89(3): 862 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. Rowland and B. Saltin
Learning from children: the emergence of pediatric exercise science
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2008; 105(1): 322 - 324.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.