Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (May 7, 2004). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00087.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/3/858    most recent
00087.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poletto, C. J
Right arrow Articles by Ludlow, C. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poletto, C. J
Right arrow Articles by Ludlow, C. L
Submitted on January 28, 2004
Accepted on April 30, 2004

Correspondence between Laryngeal Vocal Fold Movement and Muscle Activity during Speech and Non-Speech Gestures

Christopher J Poletto1*, Laura P Verdun1, Robert Strominger1, and Christy L Ludlow1

1 Laryngeal and Speech Section, MNB, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: polettoc{at}ninds.nih.gov.

To better understand the role of each of the laryngeal muscles in producing vocal fold movement, activation of these muscles was correlated with laryngeal movement during different tasks such as sniff, cough or throat clear, and speech syllable production. Four muscles (the posterior cricoarytenoid-PCA, lateral cricoarytenoid-LCA, cricothyroid-CT and thyroarytenoid-TA) were recorded with bipolar hooked wire electrodes placed bilaterally in four normal subjects. A nasoendoscope was used to record vocal fold movement while simultaneously recording muscle activity. Muscle activation level was correlated with ipsilateral vocal fold angle for vocal fold opening and closing. Pearson correlation coefficients and their statistical significance were computed for each trial. Significant effects of muscle (p<=0.0005) and task (p=0.034) were found on the r (transformed to Fisher's Z') values. All the PCA recordings related significantly with vocal opening while CT activity was significantly correlated with opening only during sniff. The TA and LCA activities were significantly correlated with vocal fold closing during cough. During speech, the CT and TA activity correlated with both opening and closing. Laryngeal muscle patterning to produce vocal fold movement differed across tasks; reciprocal muscle activity only occurred on cough while speech and sniff often involved simultaneous contraction of muscle antagonists. In conclusion, different combinations of muscle activation are used for biomechanical control of vocal fold opening and closing movements during respiratory, airway protection and speech tasks.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
F. C. Holsinger, M. S. Kies, Y. E. Weinstock, J. S. Lewin, S. Hajibashi, D. D. Nolen, R. Weber, and O. Laccourreye
Examination of the Larynx and Pharynx
N. Engl. J. Med., January 17, 2008; 358(3): e2 - e2.
[PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
V. M. Henriquez, G. M. Schulz, S. Bielamowicz, and C. L. Ludlow
Laryngeal reflex responses are not modulated during human voice and respiratory tasks
J. Physiol., December 15, 2007; 585(3): 779 - 789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.