Journal of Applied Physiology http://www.adinstruments.com/labchart/faseb
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (September 1, 2005). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00083.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/6/2363    most recent
00083.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandifer, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sandifer, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, R. E.
Submitted on January 24, 2005
Accepted on July 20, 2005

Potent Effects of Aerosol Compared to Intravenous Treprostinil on the Pulmonary Circulation

Brett L. Sandifer1*, Kenneth L. Brigham2, E. Clinton Lawrence1, David Mottola3, Chris Cuppels4, and Richard E. Parker4

1 Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; McKelvey Center for Lung Transplantation, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
2 Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Center for Translational Research in the Lung, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; McKelvey Center for Lung Transplantation, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
3 United Therapeutics Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
4 Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Center for Translational Research in the Lung, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: blsandifer{at}yahoo.com.

Inhaled vasodilator therapy for pulmonary hypertension may decrease the systemic side effects commonly observed with systemic administration. Inhaled medications only reach ventilated areas of the lung so local vasodilation may improve ventilation/perfusion matching and oxygenation. We compared the effects of intravenous versus aerosolized treprostinil on pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics in an unanesthetized sheep model of sustained acute pulmonary hypertension. Acute, stable pulmonary hypertension was induced in instrumented unanesthetized sheep by infusing a PGH2 analog, U44069. The sheep were then administered identical doses of treprostinil either intravenously or by aerosol. Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics were recorded during each administration. Both intravenous and aerosol delivery of treprostinil reduced pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary artery pressure but the effect was significantly greater with aerosol delivery (p<0.05). Aerosol delivery of treprostinil had minimal effects on systemic hemodynamics while intravenous delivery increased heart rate and cardiac output and decreased left atrial pressure and systemic blood pressure. Aerosol delivery of the prostacyclin analog treprostinil has a greater vasodilatory effect in the lung with minimal alterations in systemic hemodynamics compared to intravenous delivery of the drug. We speculate that this may result from treprostinil stimulated production of vasodilatory mediators from pulmonary epithelium.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.