Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (April 18, 2003). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00075.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/2/873    most recent
00075.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, A. C
Right arrow Articles by Lutchen, K. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, A. C
Right arrow Articles by Lutchen, K. R
Submitted on January 27, 2003
Accepted on April 16, 2003

HOW DOES AIRWAY INFLAMMATION MODULATE ASTHMATIC AIRWAY CONSTRICTION? AN ANTIGEN CHALLENGE STUDY

Angela C Henderson1, Edward P Ingenito2, Haytham Atileh1, Elliot Israel2, Bela Suki1, and Kenneth R Lutchen1*

1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
2 Pulmonary Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: klutch{at}bu.edu.

During the late phase (LP) response to inhaled allergen, mediators from neutrophils and eosinophils are released within the airways, resembling what occurs during an asthma attack. We compared the distribution of obstruction and degree of reversibility that follows a deep inspiration (DI) during early phase (EP) and LP responses in 9 asthmatics challenged with allergen. Heterogeneity of constriction was assayed by determining frequency dependence of dynamic lung resistance and elastance, airway caliber by tracking airway resistance during a deep inspiration, and airway inflammation by measuring inflammatory cells in induced sputum post-challenge. Despite a paucity of eosinophils in the sputum at baseline (less than 1% of non-squamous cells), asthmatics showed a substantial EP response with highly heterogeneous constriction and reduced capacity to maximally dilate airways. The LP was associated with substantial airway inflammation in all subjects. However, five subjects showed only mild late phase constriction (LP-) while four showed more marked LP constriction (LP+) characterized by heterogeneous constriction similar to EP. Bronchoconstriction during LP was fully alleviated by administering a bronchodilator. These findings, together with the impaired bronchodilatory response during a DI, indicate a physiologic abnormality in asthma at the smooth muscle level and that airway inflammation in asthma is associated with a highly non-uniform pattern of constriction. These data support the hypothesis that variability in responsiveness among asthmatics derives from intrinsic differences in smooth muscle response to inflammation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.