Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 23, 2005). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00047.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/3/869    most recent
00047.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Troxel, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Troxel, A. B.
Submitted on January 14, 2005
Accepted on November 16, 2005

Optimization of Oxygen Tolerance Extension in Rats by Intermittent Exposure

J. M. Clark1*, C. J. Lambertsen1, R. Gelfand1, and A. B. Troxel1

1 Environmental Biomedical Stress Data Center, Institute for Environmental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jmclark{at}mail.med.upenn.edu.

Optimization of O2 tolerance extension by intermittent exposure was studied in groups of 20 rats exposed to systematically varied patterns of alternating O2 and normoxic breathing periods at 4.0, 2.0, and 1.5 ATA. Oxygen periods of 20, 60, and 120 min were alternated with normoxic intervals that provided oxygen:normoxia ratios of 4:1, 2:1, 1:1, and 1:3. In general, median survival times had nearly linear relationships to increasing normoxic intervals with O2 period held constant. Exceptions occurred at 4.0 and 2.0 ATA where a 5-min normoxic interval was too short for adequate recovery even with a 20-min O2 period, and an O2 period of 120-min was too long even with a normoxic interval of 30 min. These exceptions did not occur at 1.5 ATA. Survival time for many intermittent exposure patterns was equivalent to that for continuous exposure to an O2 pressure definable as a time-weighted average of the alternating O2 and normoxia periods. However, this predictive method underestimated the degree of protection achieved by several of the intermittent exposure patterns, especially those performed at 4.0 ATA. Results provided guidance for selection of intermittent exposure patterns for direct evaluation in humans breathing O2 at 2.0 ATA. Definition of intermittent exposure patterns and conditions that produced prominent gains in O2 tolerance can also facilitate the performance of future experiments designed to study potential mechanisms for O2 tolerance extension by intermittent exposure. Heat shock and oxidation-specific stress proteins which are induced by exposure to oxidant injury are suggested for emphasis in such investigations.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.