Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (August 24, 2006). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00043.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/157    most recent
00043.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Gammeren, D.
Right arrow Articles by Powers, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Gammeren, D.
Right arrow Articles by Powers, S. K.
Submitted on January 13, 2006
Accepted on August 21, 2006

Diaphragmatic Nitric Oxide Synthase is Not Induced During Mechanical Ventilation

Darin Van Gammeren1, Darin J Falk1, Melissa A Deering1, Keith C DeRuisseau1, and Scott K. Powers1*

1 Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: spowers{at}hhp.ufl.edu.

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is associated with diaphragmatic oxidative stress that contributes to both diaphragmatic atrophy and contractile dysfunction. However, the pathways responsible for oxidant production in the diaphragm during MV remain unknown. To address this issue, we tested the hypothesis that nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity is elevated during MV resulting in nitration of diaphragmatic proteins. Rats were mechanically ventilated for 18 hours and time matched, anesthetized, but spontaneously breathing animals served as controls. Protein levels of eNOS, iNOS, and nNOS were measured in diaphragms from all animals. 3-nitrotyrosine levels were also measured as an index of protein nitration and S-nitrosothiol levels were measured as a marker of nitric oxide reactions with molecules containing sulfhydryl groups. Levels of nitrates and nitrites were measured as markers of stable end products of nitric oxide metabolism. Finally, as a marker of oxidative stress, diaphragmatic levels of reduced glutathione (GSH) were also analyzed. MV did not promote an increase in diaphragmatic protein levels of eNOS or nNOS. Moreover, iNOS was not detected in either experimental group. Consistent with these findings, MV did not elevate diaphragmatic 3-nitrotyrosine levels in any sub-cellular fraction of the diaphragm including the cytosolic, mitochondrial, membrane, and insoluble protein fractions. Moreover, prolonged MV did not elevate diaphragmatic levels of S-nitrosothiols, nitrate, or nitrite. Finally, prolonged MV significantly reduced diaphragmatic levels of GSH which is consistent with diaphragmatic oxidative stress. Collectively, these data reveal that MV-induced oxidative stress in the diaphragm is not due to increases in nitric oxide production by NOS.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. K. Powers, A. N. Kavazis, and J. M. McClung
Oxidative stress and disuse muscle atrophy
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2007; 102(6): 2389 - 2397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.