Journal of Applied Physiology http://www.adinstruments.com/labchart/faseb
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (June 5, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00041.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/2/603    most recent
00041.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polglase, G. R
Right arrow Articles by Hooper, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Polglase, G. R
Right arrow Articles by Hooper, S. B.
Submitted on January 15, 2008
Accepted on May 29, 2008

Differential effect of recruitment manoeuvres on Pulmonary Blood Flow and Oxygenation during HFOV in preterm lambs

Graeme R Polglase1*, Timothy JM Moss2, Ilias Nitsos1, Beth J Allison2, J. Jane Pillow1, and Stuart Brian Hooper1

1 School of Women's and Infants' Health, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
2 Dept of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: graeme.polglase{at}uwa.edu.au.

The effects of lung volume recruitment manoeuvres on pulmonary blood flow (PBF) during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in preterm neonates are unknown. As increased airway pressure adversely affects PBF, we compared the effects of two HFOV recruitment strategies on PBF and oxygenation index (OI). Preterm lambs (128±1d gestation; term ~150d) were anesthetized and ventilated using HFOV (10Hz, 33%tI) with a mean airway pressure (Pao) of 15cmH2O. Lung volume was recruited by either increasing Pao to 25cmH2O for 1 min, repeated 5 times at 5 min intervals (Sigh group; n=5) or stepwise (5cmH2O) changes in Pao at 5 min intervals incrementing up to 30cmH2O then decrementing back to 15 cmH2O (Ramp group; n=6). Controls (n=5) received constant HFOV at 15cmH2O. PBF progressively decreased (by 45±4%) and OI increased (by 15±6%, indicating reduced oxygenation) in controls during HFOV which was similar to the changes observed in the Sigh group of lambs. In the Ramp group, PBF fell (by 54±10%) as airway pressure increased (r2=0.99), although the PBF did not increase again as the Pao was subsequently reduced. The OI decreased (by 47±9%) reflecting improved oxygenation at high Pao levels during HFOV in the Ramp group. However, high Pao restored retrograde PBF during diastole in 4 of 6 lambs, indicating the restoration of right-to-left shunting through the ductus arteriosus. Thus, the choice of volume recruitment manoeuvre influences the magnitude of change in OI and PBF that occurs during HFOV. Despite significantly improving OI, the ramp recruitment approach causes sustained changes in PBF.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.