|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Medicine, Cardiology Division, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
2 FivePrime Therapeutics, inc., San Francisco, United States
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: matt.springer{at}medicine.ucsf.edu.
Efficacy of potential treatments for myocardial infarction (MI) is commonly assessed by histological measurement of infarct size in rodent models. In experiments involving an acute MI setting, measurement of the infarcted area in tissue sections of the left ventricle (LV) is a standard approach to determine infarct size. This approach has also been used in the chronic infarct setting to measure infarct area several weeks post-MI. We tested the hypothesis that due to wall thinning that is known to occur in the chronic setting, the area measurement approach would be less appropriate. We compared infarct measurements in tissue sections based on (1) infarct area, (2) epicardial and endocardial infarct arc lengths, and (3) midline infarct arc length. Infarct size from all three measurement approaches correlated significantly with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and wall motion abnormality. However, the infarct size values derived from area measurement were significantly smaller than those from the other measurements, and the range of values obtained was compressed 0.4-fold. The midline method was able to detect the expected size differences between infarcts of variable severity resulting from proximal vs. distal ligation of the coronary artery. Segmental infarct size was correlated with segmental wall motion abnormality. We conclude that both area- and length-based measurements can determine relative infarct size over a wide range of severity but the area-based measurements are substantially more compressed due to wall thinning, and that the estimation of infarct midlines is a simple, reliable approach to infarct size assessment.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Bohl, C. A. Lygate, H. Barnes, D. Medway, L.-A. Stork, J. Schulz-Menger, S. Neubauer, and J. E. Schneider Advanced methods for quantification of infarct size in mice using three-dimensional high-field late gadolinium enhancement MRI Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): H1200 - H1208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Angoulvant, S. Fazel, R. D. Weisel, T. Y.Y. Lai, P. W. Fedak, L. Chen, S. Rafati, C. K. Seneviratne, N. Degousee, and R.-K. Li Cell-based gene therapy modifies matrix remodeling after a myocardial infarction in tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-3-deficient mice. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2009; 137(2): 471 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pokreisz, S. Vandenwijngaert, V. Bito, A. Van den Bergh, I. Lenaerts, C. Busch, G. Marsboom, O. Gheysens, P. Vermeersch, L. Biesmans, et al. Ventricular Phosphodiesterase-5 Expression Is Increased in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and Contributes to Adverse Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Circulation, January 27, 2009; 119(3): 408 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lygate Letter to the editor: Infarct size measurements are critically important when comparing interventions affecting ventricular remodeling Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H3221 - H3221. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Singla, G. E. Lyon, and T. J. Kamp Reply to "Letter to the editor: Infarct size measurements are critically important when comparing interventions affecting ventricular remodeling" Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H3222 - H3222. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Shioura, D. L. Geenen, and P. H. Goldspink Assessment of cardiac function with the pressure-volume conductance system following myocardial infarction in mice Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H2870 - H2877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |