Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (June 14, 2002). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00028.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/4/1515    most recent
00028.2002v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Que, C.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Macklem, P. T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Que, C.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Macklem, P. T

Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print June 14, 2002
J Appl Physiol, 10.1152/jap.00028.2002
Submitted on January 14, 2002
Accepted on June 6, 2002

Phonospirometry for Non-invasive Measurement of Ventilation: Methodology and Preliminary Results

Cheng-Li Que1, Christof Kolmoga1, Louis Gilles Durand2, Suzanne M Kelly1, and Peter T Macklem1*

1 Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
2 Institut de Recherche Clinique de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: macklem{at}meakins.lan.mcgill.ca.

We measured tracheal flow from tracheal sounds to estimate tidal volume(VT), minute ventilation(V'I), respiratory frequency(fB), mean inspiratory flow(VT/TI) and duty cycle(TI/TTOT). In 11 normals, 3 patients with unstable airways obstruction(UAO) and 3 stable asthmatics(SA) we measured tracheal sounds and flow twice, the first, to derive flow/sound and the second for flow/volume(Ve) relationships from the sound signal. Ve was compared to pneumotach-derived volume (Vm). When seated, facing forward and with neck rotation, flexion and standing, Ve was within 15% of Vm. The error increased with neck extension and supine. We then measured ventilation without mouthpiece or noseclip from tracheal sounds during quiet breathing for up to 30 minutes. Normal results±1SD revealed VT=0.37±0.065L, fB=19.3±3.5/min, V'I=6.9±1.2L/min, VT/TI=0.31±0.06L/sec, and TI/TTOT=0.37±0.04. UOA had large V'I due to increased VT/TI. With the exception of TI/TTOT, variations in ventilatory parameters were closer to log normal than normal distributions and tended to be greater in patients. We conclude that phonospirometry measures ventilation reasonably accurately without mouthpiece, noseclip or rigid postural constraints.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1966 by the American Physiological Society.