Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (July 7, 2005). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00010.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/5/1769    most recent
00010.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rassier, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Herzog, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rassier, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Herzog, W.
Submitted on January 4, 2005
Accepted on July 7, 2005

The relationship between force and stiffness in muscle fibers after stretch

Dilson E. Rassier1* and Walter Herzog1

1 Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rassier{at}kin.ucalgary.ca.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between force and stiffness following stretch of activated fibers, while simultaneously changing contractility by interfering with the cross-bridge kinetics and muscle activation. Single fibers dissected from lumbrical muscles of frogs were placed at a length 20% longer than the plateau of the force-length relationship, activated, and stretched by 5% and 10% of fiber length (speed: 40% fiber length/s). Experiments were conducted with maximal and sub-maximal stimulation in Ringer solution, and with the addition of 2 mM and 5 mM of the myosin inhibitor 2,3-Butanodione monoxime (BDM) to the solution. The steady-state force following stretch of an activated fiber was higher than the isometric force produced at the corresponding length in all conditions investigated. Lowering the frequency of stimulation decreased the force and stiffness during isometric contractions, but did not change force enhancement and stiffness enhancement following stretch. Administration of BDM decreased the force and stiffness during isometric contractions, but increased the force enhancement and stiffness enhancement following stretch. The relationship between force enhancement and stiffness suggests that the increase in force following stretch may be caused by an increase in the proportion of cross-bridges attached to actin. Since BDM places cross-bridges in a weakly-bound, pre powerstroke state, our results further suggest that force enhancement is partially associated with a recruitment of weakly-bound cross-bridges into a strongly-bound state.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. R. Bullimore, B. R. MacIntosh, and W. Herzog
Is a parallel elastic element responsible for the enhancement of steady-state muscle force following active stretch?
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2008; 211(18): 3001 - 3008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
W. Herzog and T. Leonard
Reply from Walter Herzog (on behalf of the authors) and Tim Leonard
J. Physiol., January 15, 2007; 578(2): 617 - 620.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.