Journal of Applied Physiology AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 99: 2452, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00841.2005
8750-7587/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joyner, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Joyner, M. J.

POINT-COUNTERPOINT COMMENTS

Comment on Point:Counterpoint "Flow-mediated dilation does/does not reflect nitric oxide-mediated endothelial function"

Michael J. Joyner

Department of Anesthesiology
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota

This letter is in response to the Point-Counterpoint series "Flow-mediated dilation does/does not reflect nitric oxide-mediated endothelial function." that appeared in the September issue (vol. 99: 1233–1238, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00601; http://jap.physiology.org/content/vol99/issue3).

To the Editor: The exchange by Drs. Green and Tschakovsky (2) highlight some specific issues and limitations related to the use, misuse, and over-extrapolation of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) as a tool to noninvasively assess "endothelial function" in humans. FMD can be influenced by sympathetic tone and the magnitude of the shear stress evoked by the reactive hyperemia (3, 4). Additionally, these modifiers of FMD can differ in a number of conditions and diseases where FMD, and hence "endothelial" function, also differ. More importantly, there is also no relationship between more direct pharmacological tests of endothelial function in the forearm and FMD (1). All of these concerns raise questions about how robustly FMD reflects endothelial function.

With these limitations in mind, why are measures of FMD so "popular"? First, the technique is noninvasive. Second, it can be performed by technicians using equipment available in clinical labs. Third, it can be done on a high-throughput basis. Fourth, and perhaps most importantly, sophisticated integrative physiology techniques frequently seem to be a lost art in clinical investigation. That having been said, is it better to perform detailed, invasive, and time consuming physiological investigations that provide clear mechanistic insight on a limited number of subjects? Or do we continue to let screening tests on large numbers of subjects serve as over-simplified surrogate markers for complex biological events? Understanding how new mechanisms discovered in reductionist preparations contribute to physiological and pathophysiological events will require clinical investigators to relearn how to do integrative physiology in humans.

FOOTNOTES


e-mail: joyner.michael{at}mayo.edu

REFERENCES

  1. Eskurza I, Seals DR, DeSouza CA, and Tanaka H. Pharmacologic versus flow-mediated assessments of peripheral vascular endothelial vasodilatory function in humans. Am J Cardiol 88: 1067–1069, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Green D; Tschakovsky ME and Pyke KE. Point:Counterpoint. Flow-mediated dilation does/does not reflect nitric oxide-mediated endothelial function. J Appl Physiol 99: 1233–1238, 2005.[Free Full Text]
  3. Hijmering ML, Stroes ESGIO, Iijhoek J, Hutten BA, Blankestijn PJ, and Rebelink TJ. Sympathetic activation markedly reduces endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated vasodilation. J Am Coll Cardiol 39: 683–688, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pyke KE, Dwyer EM, and Tschakovsky ME. Impact of controlling shear rate on flow-mediated dilation responses in the brachial artery of humans. J Appl Physiol 97: 499–508, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joyner, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Joyner, M. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.