Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 99: 1858-1865, 2005. First published July 21, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00305.2005
8750-7587/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/5/1858    most recent
00305.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iwashita, S.
Right arrow Articles by Flakoll, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iwashita, S.
Right arrow Articles by Flakoll, P. J.

Impact of glutamine supplementation on glucose homeostasis during and after exercise

Soh Iwashita,1 Phillip Williams,2 Kareem Jabbour,2 Takeo Ueda,3 Hisamine Kobayashi,3 Shawn Baier,1 and Paul J. Flakoll1,2

1Center for Designing Foods to Improve Nutrition, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa; 2Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennesse; and 3AminoScience Laboratories, Ajinomoto Co. Inc., Kawasaki, Japan

Submitted 15 March 2005 ; accepted in final form 14 July 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The interaction of glutamine availability and glucose homeostasis during and after exercise was investigated, measuring whole body glucose kinetics with [3-3H]glucose and net organ balances of glucose and amino acids (AA) during basal, exercise, and postexercise hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp periods in six multicatheterized dogs. Dogs were studied twice in random treatment order: once with glutamine (12 µmol·kg–1·min–1; Gln) and once with saline (Con) infused intravenously during and after exercise. Plasma glucose fell by 7 mg/dl with exercise in Con (P < 0.05), but it did not fall with Gln. Gln further stimulated whole body glucose production and utilization an additional 24% above a normal exercise response (P < 0.05). Net hepatic uptake of glutamine and alanine was greater with Gln than Con during exercise (P < 0.05). Net hepatic glucose output was increased sevenfold during exercise with Gln (P < 0.05) but not with Con. Net hindlimb glucose uptake was increased similarly during exercise in both groups (P < 0.05). During the postexercise hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic period, glucose production decreased to near zero with Con, but it did not decrease below basal levels with Gln. Gln increased glucose utilization by 16% compared with Con after exercise (P < 0.05). Furthermore, net hindlimb glucose uptake in the postexercise period was increased approximately twofold vs. basal with Gln (P < 0.05) but not with Con. Net hepatic uptake of glutamine during the postexercise period was threefold greater for Gln than Con (P < 0.05). In conclusion, glutamine availability modulates glucose homeostasis during and after exercise, which may have implications for postexercise recovery.

isotopic tracer; glucose kinetics; net organ balance; gluconeogenic amino acid


GLUTAMINE IS ONE OF THE MOST abundant free amino acids (AA) found in the body, playing a central metabolic role during many important biological processes, such as immune function (15), neurological activity (19), and the development and maintenance of gastrointestinal integrity (15). The skeletal muscle glutamine pool is significantly reduced under several types of metabolic stress (15), providing a basis for glutamine to be referred to as a "conditionally essential" AA.

Whether glutamine availability is limiting during and after the stress of exercise is not uniformly clear. This may partially be due to differences in study design, including the length and intensity of exercise, or the fact that some investigators report values for blood and some for muscle and a glutamine concentration gradient exists between blood and muscle. Circulating glutamine has been demonstrated to increase with exercise (4). However, others have shown that muscle glutamine progressively decreases with exercise in swimming rats (10), circulating glutamine decreases in running dogs (13), and the net loss of glutamine from muscle is greater with exercise in both dogs (35) and humans (12). After exercise, however, the majority of data suggest that glutamine availability is reduced, particularly after strenuous exercise (13). This has led to the hypothesis that reduced circulating glutamine may be an indicator of exercise stress and overtraining (21, 29).

Even less is known about the role glutamine availability plays in exercise-related metabolism. Recent studies have suggested important interactions between glutamine and carbohydrate homeostasis (3, 5, 20, 23, 30). Glutamine carbon has potential to enter the Krebs cycle through {alpha}-ketoglutarate, thereby providing carbon for gluconeogenesis (1). Glutamine has also been shown to interact with glucose utilization, stimulating whole body glucose utilization and hindlimb glucose uptake during hyperinsulinemic euglycemia in postabsorptive dogs (5).

Exercise elevates whole body glucose utilization to meet fuel demands in both exercising and nonexercising tissues (14, 31, 33). On the other hand, the liver responds to exercise by increasing glucose production to meet these increased demands for glucose (31, 33). After exercise, glucose production and utilization initially remain elevated, and insulin sensitivity is enhanced to facilitate glycogen replenishment in the liver and skeletal muscle tissues (22, 26, 28). Although glutamine appears to interact with glucose production and utilization, it has not been elucidated whether glutamine influences glucose production and utilization during and after exercise. Furthermore, while there is considerable commercial interest in using glutamine as an ergogenic aid, few studies have investigated the interactions of glutamine with glucose metabolism during and after exercise (7, 32).

Therefore, the following study was conducted to test the hypotheses that 1) increased glutamine availability would further stimulate glucose production and utilization during exercise and 2) increased glutamine availability after exercise would enhance glucose production and insulin-mediated glucose utilization. Therefore, to investigate the interactions between glutamine availability and glucose metabolism during and after exercise, isotope-dilution and organ-balance techniques were used in exercising multicatheterized dogs. The exercise period represents the influence of glutamine during a situation when both glucose production and utilization are stimulated. In the postexercise period, a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique was used to represent a condition similar to postexercise carbohydrate supplementation, when accelerated glycogen repletion is beneficial but glucose production is blunted by insulin.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and surgical preparation.   The multicatheterized conscious canine model was used in the study. Mongrel dogs (n = 6; mean weight 22.8 ± 0.4 kg) of either gender were handled according to American Association for the Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care guidelines, and the study protocol was approved by the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Animal Care Committee. The dogs were housed individually and were fed one time daily with meat (Kal Kan Meat, Vernon, CA) and chow (Lab Canine Diet no. 5006; Purina Mills, St. Louis, MO). Water was provided ad libitum. Dietary composition was ~31% protein, 52% carbohydrate, 11% fat, and 6% fiber. Body weight was unchanged from the day of surgery to the day of the experiment.

Surgical procedures were conducted as previously described (5). Briefly, the dogs were placed under anesthesia (20 mg/kg pentothal sodium and 1.0% isoflurane inhalation) and intubated, mechanical ventilation was provided, and a midline laparotomy was performed for placement of indwelling catheters and flow probes. Silastic catheters (0.04 in. ID; Dow Corning, Midline, MI) were inserted into the left femoral artery and into the left common hepatic, portal, and right common iliac veins for the sampling of blood. A catheter was also placed in the vena cava for infusions of D-[3-3H]glucose (New England Nuclear, Boston, MA) and glutamine (Ajinomoto, Kawasaki, Japan). Catheters were also placed in the splenic and jejunal veins for intraportal delivery of insulin. The catheters were filled with heparinized saline (200 U/ml; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL), and their free ends were knotted and placed in a subcutaneous pouch until the day of the metabolic study. Doppler blood flow cuffs (Transonic Systems, Ithaca, NY) were placed around the right external iliac artery, the portal vein, and the hepatic artery to measure hindlimb, portal vein, and hepatic artery blood flows, respectively. These leads also were placed in a subcutaneous pocket.

Each dog was allowed to recover from surgery for ~18 days before the metabolic study. One week after surgery, dogs were trained to exercise on a motorized treadmill. Animals were not exercised during the 48 h preceding the metabolic study. Before study, the dogs had to exhibit good health, including 1) consumption of daily food rations, 2) normal stools, 3) blood leukocyte count <18,000/ mm, and 4) hematocrit >38%. The dogs were fasted overnight (18 h) before the metabolic study.

On the morning of the metabolic study, all catheters and blood flow cuff leads were removed from the subcutaneous pouches using local anesthesia (2% lidocaine; Astra Pharmaceutical, Worcester, MA). The catheters were aspirated to remove any contents and were flushed with saline. The dogs were then placed in a Pavlov harness, and infusion of 1 U/ml heparinized saline (0.1 ml/min) was started via the arterial catheter to maintain patency and to replace the volume of blood removed during experimentation. In addition, 18-gauge angiocatheters (Becton-Dickinson, Sandy, UT) were inserted percutaneously into a cephalic vein for infusion of glucose as needed.

Experimental protocol.   The experimental protocol used in the metabolic study is depicted in Fig. 1. Each metabolic study consisted of a 120-min equilibration period (–150 to –30 min), a 30-min basal sampling period (–30 to 0 min), a 90-min moderate-intensity exercise period (0 to 90 min), and a 150-min postexercise period (90 to 240 min). A bolus infusion of D-[3-3H]glucose (30 µCi) was given to initiate the study. This was followed by a constant infusion of D-[3-3H]glucose (20 µCi/h) throughout the 390-min study. Arterial, femoral venous, portal venous, and hepatic venous blood samples were drawn every 30 min starting at the end of the equilibration period (time = –30, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, and 240 min). At simultaneous time points, blood flow measurements from Doppler flow probes were recorded from continuous online data. Data for plasma AA and net organ AA balance are taken from the last sample of each sampling period (0, 90, and 240 min). The other parameters are average of all samplings in each period. Plasma flow was determined from blood flow using hematocrit. Caloric expenditures were measured by indirect calorimetry (2900 Metabolic Measurement Cart, SensorMedics, Loma Linda, CA) during the basal and postexercise periods.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The experimental design consisted of equilibration, basal, exercise, and postexercise periods during which [3-3H]glucose was infused continuously to measure glucose kinetics. A hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp was performed during the postexercise period. Blood and breath samples ({blacktriangleup}) were taken every 30-min during basal, exercise, and postexercise periods. Indirect calorimetry ({leftrightarrow}) was used to measure oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production rates during basal and postexercise periods. Glutamine (Gln) or saline (Con) were infused intravenously during exercise and postexercise.

 
Exercise was performed on a motorized treadmill for 90 min at 100 m/min with a 12% grade. The exercise intensity used in these experiments has previously been shown to result in a twofold increase in heart rate and an increase in oxygen uptake to 50% of maximum (18). During the 150-min postexercise period, hyperinsulinemic euglycemia was maintained by 1) intraportal infusion of porcine insulin (Squibb-Novo, Princeton, NJ) in a 1.5% bovine serum albumin normal saline solution at 2 mU·kg–1·min–1 to maintain portal and peripheral insulin at normal postabsorptive levels and 2) a variable- rate infusion of glucose (20% dextrose, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) in the cephalic vein to maintain basal glucose concentrations. Frequent (every 5–10 min) arterial blood samples were collected to assess the maintenance of basal blood glucose concentrations during the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp.

Each dog was subjected to two test protocols on separate days: 1) a constant infusion of glutamine (Gln) at 12 µmol·kg–1·min–1 in normal saline (0.12 ml/min) or 2) a constant infusion of the same volume of normal saline (Con; 0.12 ml/min) during the exercise and postexercise periods. There were at least 2 wk between the two experimental treatment days, and the order in which these treatments were given was random.

Analytic procedures.   Analytical methods were conducted as previously described (5). Briefly, the blood samples were collected in heparinized syringes and placed in tubes containing Na2EDTA for analyses of plasma. The blood was spun in a refrigerated (4°C) desktop centrifuge at 3,000 g for 10 min. Plasma was collected and immediately placed on ice until analysis. Blood glucose concentration was determined by a glucose analyzer (Beckman Instruments, Palo Alto, CA). Plasma glucose specific activity was determined by liquid scintillation counting after cold precipitation of plasma protein with 0.066 N barium hydroxide and 0.066 N zinc sulfate. Aliquots of arterial plasma were transferred to separate tubes and stored at –70°C for later determination of insulin and glucagon concentrations. Immunoactive insulin and glucagon were determined using a disequilibirum double-antibody RIA system (Linco Research, St. Charles, MO) with a coefficient of variation of 5%. Plasma AA concentrations were determined by using a EZ:faast gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis kit (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA). The kit consists of a solid phase extraction step, followed by a derivatization procedure. Derivatized samples were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (model 6890/5973, Agilient Technologies).

Calculations.   Tracer-determined glucose rates of appearance (Ra) and disappearance (Rd) as estimates of whole body glucose production and utilization were calculated according to the isotope-dilution method outlined by Altszuler et al. (2). Whole body endogenous glucose Ra was calculated by subtracting the exogenous glucose infusion rate from the total Ra. Note that endogenous glucose production represents both hepatic and extrahepatic (e.g., renal) glucose production, and it thus could be a slight overestimate of hepatic glucose production. Because of the constant tracer infusion and the increases in glucose from increased glucose production and glucose infusion, the specific activity of plasma glucose fell during the exercise and postexercise periods (8,589 ± 1,062, 5,791 ± 644, and 3,612 ± 189 dpm/mg for basal, exercise, and postexercise periods for Con and 6,131 ± 1,000, 3,737 ± 857, 2,514 ± 492 dpm/mg for Gln, respectively).

Net hepatic and hindlimb glucose balances were calculated by the same calculations as previously described using arterial-venous differences and blood flow measurements (5). Hepatic flow of blood into the liver is carried by both the portal vein and the hepatic artery, and the entire flow of blood out of the liver is carried by the hepatic vein. Blood flow rates in both the portal vein and hepatic artery were measured by Doppler flow probes. Thus the equation for net hepatic balance is as follows:

where the brackets represents substrate concentration in a vessel, HV is hepatic vein, A is artery, PV is portal vein, HA is hepatic artery, %PF represents contribution of HA or PV plasma flow to total hepatic flow, and BW represents body weight (in kg). Note that, in each case, the variable represents the net balance between organ production and utilization. Caloric expenditures were calculated by indirect calorimetry, using measurements of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production rates as previously described (16).

Statistical analysis.   All data analyses were done using SAS statistical software packages (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The variables from the time points within each period were averaged across the period for each experimental unit similar to an area under the curve. The data are expressed as means ± SE for each period and treatment. Two-way ANOVA (treatment x period) with repeated measures was employed to identify overall significant model effects. Significant differences among means were determined by pairwise contrast comparisons between Con and Gln (treatment) or between basal and either exercise or postexercise periods (period within treatment). Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Basal period.   Body weights on the metabolic study days were not different between Con and Gln (22.9 ± 0.6 and 22.7 ± 0.6 kg, respectively). Each of the dogs successfully completed the running portion of their trial at the desired speed and grade, and the exercise speed and rate were identical for each dog regardless of the treatment they were receiving. Furthermore, there were no differences between treatments for any of the variables measured during the basal period.

Exercise period.   During exercise, plasma glucose significantly fell by 7 mg/dl in Con, but this fall was blunted in Gln (Table 1). Insulin decreased (P < 0.05), glucagon increased (P < 0.05), and hindlimb blood flow was accelerated (P < 0.05) similarly in both treatment groups during exercise. Hepatic artery and portal vein blood flow was not different between treatment groups during exercise.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Arterial plasma glucose, insulin, and glucagon concentrations and blood flow rate

 
Both whole body glucose production and utilization were significantly increased by 49% with exercise in Con (Figs. 2 and 3). Gln further increased production and utilization an additional 24% (P < 0.05). Net hepatic glucose output increased sevenfold during exercise with Gln (P < 0.05), whereas a nonsignificant fourfold increase was observed with Con (P = 0.064) (Fig. 4). Finally, hindlimb uptake of glucose was significantly increased by exercise similarly (~4-fold) in both treatment groups (Fig. 5).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Rates of endogenous whole body glucose production (Ra) for 6 dogs during basal, exercise (Ex), and postexercise (Post-Ex) hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic periods. Glutamine (Gln) or saline (Con) were continuously infused during Ex and Post-Ex. Data are the average of all points within each period. *P < 0.05 vs. Con. {dagger}P < 0.05 vs. basal.

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Rates of whole body glucose utilization (Rd) for 6 dogs during basal, Ex, and Post-Ex hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic periods. Glutamine (Gln) or saline (Con) were continuously infused during Ex and Post-Ex. Data are the average of all points within each period. *P < 0.05 vs. Con. {dagger}P < 0.05 vs. basal.

 


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Rates of net hepatic glucose balance for 6 dogs during basal, Ex, and Post-Ex hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic periods. Glutamine (Gln) or saline (Con) were continuously infused during Ex and Post-Ex. Positive values denote net output, and negative values denote net uptake. Data are the average of all points within each period. {dagger}P < 0.05 vs. basal.

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Rates of net hindlimb glucose balance (uptake) for 6 dogs during basal, Ex, and Post-Ex hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic periods. Glutamine (Gln) or saline (Con) were continuously infused during Ex and post-Ex. Data are the average of all points within each period. {dagger}P < 0.05 vs. basal.

 
Whereas plasma glutamine concentration was not significantly increased in Con, plasma glutamine increased by 72% in Gln (P < 0.05; Table 2). Individual and total essential plasma AA concentrations were not different between groups during exercise. However, summed gluconeogenic, nonessential, and total AA were significantly higher in Gln than in Con, primarily due to increased glutamine.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Arterial plasma amino acid concentrations

 
Net hepatic uptake of gluconeogenic, essential, nonessential, and total AA were greater in Gln than in Con during exercise (P < 0.05; Table 3). Individually, net hepatic uptakes of glutamine and alanine were increased to a greater extent in Gln than Con (P < 0.05). Net hindlimb AA balance was not significantly different between treatments during exercise (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Net hepatic amino acid balances

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Net hindlimb amino acid balances

 
Postexercise hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic period.   During the postexercise period, plasma glucose, insulin, and glucagon were maintained to a similar degree in both groups (Table 1). In addition, portal vein, hepatic artery, and hindlimb blood flows were not significantly different between two groups.

The rate of exogenous glucose infusion needed to maintain euglycemia during hyperinsulinemia was not significantly different between Con and Gln (8.32 ± 0.77 vs. 7.10 ± 0.47 mg·kg–1·min–1). Endogenous glucose production with Con significantly decreased from basal to near zero due to the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemia (Fig. 2). Conversely, glucose production did not fall below basal levels and was significantly higher in Gln. Glucose utilization was significantly increased during the postexercise period in both groups (Fig. 3), but glucose utilization was 16% greater in Gln than Con (P < 0.05). The liver switched from net production to net utilization of glucose similarly in both groups, suggesting an active replenishment of hepatic glycogen stores (Fig. 4). Net uptake of glucose by the hindlimb was significantly increased from basal for Gln, but there was no significant change from basal with Con (Fig. 5).

Plasma glutamine concentration was twofold greater in Gln than Con during the postexercise period (Table 2). Other AA were not significantly different between treatments.

Net hepatic uptake of glutamine was over threefold greater for Gln than Con during the postexercise period (Table 3). However, the net uptake of other individual AA was not significantly different between treatments. Net hepatic uptake of total gluconeogenic AA was significantly higher in Gln than in Con (Table 3), primarily due to differences in Gln uptake. Net hindlimb balance of AA was not significantly different between groups (Table 4).

Resting energy expenditure was not significantly different for Gln vs. Con (Table 5). Furthermore, nonprotein respiratory quotients were similar between groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Energy expenditure and nonprotein respiratory quotient

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The present study was designed to investigate the effect of glutamine availability on whole body glucose kinetics and net organ glucose and AA balances during and after exercise. The major findings during exercise were: 1) Gln further stimulated glucose production and utilization an additional 24% above a normal exercise response, and 2) hepatic uptake of gluconeogenic precursors glutamine and alanine was enhanced in Gln. The major findings during a 150-min period of postexercise hyperinsulinemic euglycemia were 1) glucose production, which was near zero in Con due to the hyperinsulinemic conditions, was stimulated by Gln; 2) net hepatic uptake of glutamine was greater in Gln; and 3) Gln increased whole body glucose utilization by 16%. Thus these findings help our understanding of mechanisms by which glutamine may modify glucose homeostasis during and after exercise.

During exercise, hormonal and neural conditions are suitable for stimulating glucose production. Circulating concentrations of plasma glucagon and epinephrine are increased, and insulin is slightly decreased (33). In our study, exercise increased glucose production by 48% in Con. Increased glutamine availability further stimulated glucose production 24% during exercise without differences in the hormonal milieu vs. Con. As far as we know, this is the first evidence that glutamine interacts with exercise to increase endogenous glucose production. Stoichiometrically, the amount of glutamine infused during exercise had the theoretical potential to form glucose at the rate of 1.1 mg·kg–1·min–1. The additional glucose produced was 1.3 mg·kg–1·min–1, suggesting that not all of the glucose could be accounted for via gluconeogenesis from glutamine.

It is important to maintain plasma glucose during exercise, because circulating glucose provides energy for muscle contraction and is the primary source of energy used by neural tissue during exercise. In the present study, the plasma glucose pool gradually decreased as exercise continued in the Con group. However, plasma glucose was maintained at basal levels with Gln, suggesting that an important fate of the increased glucose production was to sustain the total body glucose pool during exercise.

Gluconeogenesis normally contributes ~20% of total glucose production during 90 min of exercise in overnight-fasted dogs (33). It would be anticipated that the fractional contribution of gluconeogenesis to total hepatic glucose production would be greater, if gluconeogenic precursors were supplemented during exercise. We found that increased glutamine availability during exercise enhanced hepatic glutamine and alanine uptake, net hepatic glucose production, and total whole body glucose production. Roef et al. (27) demonstrated that infusion of another glucogenic precursor (lactate) during low-intensity exercise increased both total glucose production and contribution of gluconeogenesis to glucose production compared with bicarbonate infusion. In addition, Miller et al. (17) demonstrated that incorporation of 13C from tracer lactate into blood glucose was increased with a lactate clamp (~4 mM) during moderate exercise. Together these previous studies and the present study support the concept that gluconeogenic precursors can be significant sources of glucose during exercise. The efficacy of providing glucose precursors vs. glucose itself, however, cannot be established from the present study and requires further evaluation.

It has been speculated that the rate of Krebs cycle flux and concentration of Krebs cycle intermediates may be limiting to exercise performance (6). However, when oral supplementation of glutamine was used to increase the Krebs cycle intermediate pool in muscle, neither endurance capacity nor the degree of phosphocreatine depletion or lactate accumulation was altered (6). In a similar study, an increase in Krebs cycle intermediate pool did not have a significant increase in oxidative energy production (8), suggesting that glutamine may promote anaplerosis, but its potential translation to direct improvements in performance may be limiting.

Net hepatic glutamine and alanine uptake was greater in Gln than in Con during exercise. Surprisingly, those differences between groups existed despite the fact that plasma levels of alanine were not different between treatments. These data suggest that interaction of glutamine and exercise may promote hepatic extraction of the gluconeogenic AA. Perriello et al. (24) also demonstrated that glutamine supplementation increased glucose production from glutamine and also from alanine even in the absence of a change in plasma alanine concentrations. Glutamine also has been suggested to activate gluconeogenic enzymes, such as phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase in rat kidney or fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase in cultured HeLa cells and fibroblasts (30). The enzymes of glucogenic pathway in the liver may be stimulated by glutamine. While the present study does not provide such data, one may speculate that glutamine regulates gluconeogeneis via stimulation of hepatic gluconeogenic AA transport systems.

The extension of these results to relevant situations in humans needs to be done with care. Glucose metabolism in canines and humans responds to exercise and euglycemic hyperinsulinemia similarly (34), and certainly qualitative changes and conclusions would be expected to be applicable to exercising humans. However, extending these results in healthy dogs undergoing intravenous infusions of glutamine to humans under the conditions of postsurgical stress, trauma, or diabetes mellitus would require further research to determine whether glucose homeostasis could be altered with glutamine under these specific conditions.

Furthermore, there were several options available for the delivery of glutamine. Previous human studies have used both an intravenous (32) and an oral (7) route to deliver glutamine. Oral intake of glutamine is certainly the closest to what would occur under practical conditions of exercise training. However, glutamine delivered orally is subject to differences in absorption and gastrointestinal tract degradation. Oral glutamine also could potentially create gastrointestinal distress. Therefore, glutamine was delivered via a peripheral vein in the present study to provide the best route for a controlled metabolic study, and the data need to be considered in this context.

In the present study, whole body glucose utilization was higher with Gln than Con during exercise, but where this increased glucose utilization occurred is unclear. The main fate of glucose taken up by tissues during exercise is oxidation, and skeletal muscle is quantitatively the most important site of glucose utilization during exercise. However, net hindlimb glucose uptake was not significantly increased with Gln during exercise in the present study, suggesting that the rate of hindlimb glucose utilization is regulated more by exercise itself than by substrate availability. This casts doubt on the potential for increased glutamine availability during exercise to directly improve performance.

The liver is also a metabolically active tissue during exercise, and hepatic glucose utilization has been shown to be increased during exercise (33). The liver needs fuel to facilitate its metabolic activity during exercise, and it is possible that increased hepatic utilization of glucose with Gln during exercise was responsible for the enhanced whole body glucose utilization observed. However, this cannot be assessed because only net hepatic balance was measured. Another important fuel during exercise, fat, has been shown to be spared from hepatic oxidation due to glutamine supplementation (9, 11). While Randle et al. (25) proposed that glucose oxidation is inversely proportional to the quantity of fatty acids available for oxidation, further work is required to understand if glutamine promotes changes in hepatic oxidative substrate metabolism during exercise.

In the present study, a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique was employed during the postexercise period to simulate, in a controlled manner, a postexercise situation where glycogen repletion is accelerated via glucose intake. As would be expected in this situation, glucose production was inhibited to near zero in the control. However, glutamine infusion blunted the inhibitory effect of insulin on glucose production, which is consistent with our previous report using postabsorptive nonexercising dogs (5). Bowtell et al. (7) investigated the effect of glutamine on glucose production after exercise in humans, providing either glutamine alone, glutamine plus glucose polymer, or glucose alone after exercise. In this case, glucose production was greatest in glutamine plus glucose. In the present study, glutamine infusion could theoretically account for only 1.1 of 2.9 mg·kg–1·min–1 endogenous glucose production during the postexercise period, suggesting that other mechanisms made significant contributions to this increase. The increased endogenous glucose production allowed less glucose to be infused (1.2 mg·kg–1·min–1; nonsignificant) and increased whole body glucose utilization (1.4 mg·kg–1·min–1). Interestingly, these total changes (2.6 mg·kg–1·min–1) were very close to the increase in endogenous glucose production (2.9 mg·kg–1·min–1). It may be speculated that if glucose were infused at equal rates in both groups, glucose utilization would have been even greater in the Gln group.

In conclusion, glutamine infusion during exercise increased whole body glucose production, resulting in increased whole body glucose utilization and maintenance of circulating glucose levels. Whether this has potential to translate to improvements in exercise performance needs to be assessed in future studies, but hindlimb glucose utilization was not altered by increased glutamine availability during exercise. Glutamine promoted postexercise glucose production despite hyperinsulinemic euglycemia, and it also augmented insulin's action on whole body glucose utilization. Glutamine enhanced hindlimb glucose uptake after exercise, but the potential for this increased uptake to translate to faster muscle recovery and improved subsequent exercise performance needs to be assessed by future studies.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
These studies were supported in part by a grant from Ajinomoto Co. Inc., Kawasaki, Japan.


    DISCLOSURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
T. Uedo and H. Kobayashi are full-time employees of Ajinomoto Co. Inc., which sells glutamine.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The authors thank Dr. Deanna Levenhagen for contribution in the conduct of these studies, Wanda Snead for technical assistance in the measurement of plasma hormones, and Dr. John Rathmacher for technical assistance in the measurement of amino acid concentrations. We also appreciate the help of Man-Yu Yum and Dr. Philip Dixon, who gave us useful advice for statistical analyses.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. J. Flakoll, Food Science and Human Nutrition, 1127 Human Nutritional Sciences Bldg., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011 (e-mail: flakollp{at}iastate.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Abumrad NN, Yazigi N, Cersosimo E, Hourani H, Gedde S, Bulus N, and Williams P. Glutamine metabolism during starvation. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 14: 71S–76S, 1990.
  2. Altszuler N, De Bodo RC, Steele R, and Wall JS. Measurement of size and turnover rate of body glucose pool by the isotope dilution method. Am J Physiol 187: 15–24, 1956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ballard TC, Farag A, Branum GD, Akwari OE, and Opara EC. Effect of L-glutamine supplementation on impaired glucose regulation during intravenous lipid administration. Nutrition 12: 349–354, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Bergstrom J, Furst P, and Hultman E. Free amino acids in muscle tissue and plasma during exercise in man. Clin Physiol 5: 155–160, 1985.[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Borel MJ, Williams PE, Jabbour K, Levenhagen D, Kaizer E, and Flakoll PJ. Parenteral glutamine infusion alters insulin-mediated glucose metabolism. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 22: 280–285, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bowtell JL and Bruce M. Glutamine: an anaplerotic precursor. Nutrition 18: 222–224, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Bowtell JL, Gelly K, Jackman ML, Patel A, Simeoni M, and Rennie MJ. Effect of oral glutamine on whole body carbohydrate storage during recovery from exhaustive exercise. J Appl Physiol 86: 1770–1777, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Bruce M, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Greenhaff PL, Boobis LH, Williams C, and Bowtell JL. Glutamine supplementation promotes anaplerosis but not oxidative energy delivery in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 280: E669–E675, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Cersosimo E, Williams P, Hoxworth B, Lacy W, and Abumrad N. Glutamine blocks lipolysis and ketogenesis of fasting. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 250: E248–E252, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Christophe J, Winand J, Kutzner R, and Hebbelinck M. Amino acid levels in plasma, liver, muscle, and kidney during and after exercise in fasted and fed rats. Am J Physiol 221: 453–457, 1971.[Free Full Text]
  11. Dechelotte P, Darmaun D, Rongier M, Hecketsweiler B, Rigal O, and Desjeux JF. Absorption and metabolic effects of enterally administered glutamine in humans. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 260: G677–G682, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Eriksson LS, Broberg S, Bjorkman O, and Wahren J. Ammonia metabolism during exercise in man. Clin Physiol 5: 325–336, 1985.[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Halseth AE, Rheaume N, Messina AB, Reed EK, Krishna MG, Flakoll PJ, Lacy DB, and Wasserman DH. Regulation of hepatic glutamine metabolism during exercise in the dog. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 275: E655–E664, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Hayashi T, Wojtaszewski JF, and Goodyear LJ. Exercise regulation of glucose transport in skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 273: E1039–E1051, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lacey JM and Wilmore DW. Is glutamine a conditionally essential amino acid? Nutr Rev 48: 297–309, 1990.[Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Levenhagen DK, Gresham JD, Carlson MG, Maron DJ, Borel MJ, and Flakoll PJ. Postexercise nutrient intake timing in humans is critical to recovery of leg glucose and protein homeostasis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 280: E982–E993, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Miller BF, Fattor JA, Jacobs KA, Horning MA, Navazio F, Lindinger MI, and Brooks GA. Lactate and glucose interactions during rest and exercise in men: effect of exogenous lactate infusion. J Physiol 544: 963–975, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Musch TI, Friedman DB, Pitetti KH, Haidet GC, Stray-Gundersen J, Mitchell JH, and Ordway GA. Regional distribution of blood flow of dogs during graded dynamic exercise. J Appl Physiol 63: 2269–2277, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Newsholme P, Procopio J, Lima MM, Pithon-Curi TC, and Curi R. Glutamine and glutamate—their central role in cell metabolism and function. Cell Biochem Funct 21: 1–9, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Opara EC, Petro A, Tevrizian A, Feinglos MN, and Surwit RS. L-Glutamine supplementation of a high fat diet reduces body weight and attenuates hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in C57BL/6J mice. J Nutr 126: 273–279, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Parry-Billings M, Budgett R, Koutedakis Y, Blomstrand E, Brooks S, Williams C, Calder PC, Pilling S, Baigrie R, and Newsholme EA. Plasma amino acid concentrations in the overtraining syndrome: possible effects on the immune system. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24: 1353–1358, 1992.[Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Pencek RR, James F, Lacy DB, Jabbour K, Williams PE, Fueger PT, and Wasserman DH. Interaction of insulin and prior exercise in control of hepatic metabolism of a glucose load. Diabetes 52: 1897–1903, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Perriello G, Jorde R, Nurjhan N, Stumvoll M, Dailey G, Jenssen T, Bier DM, and Gerich JE. Estimation of glucose-alanine-lactate-glutamine cycles in postabsorptive humans: role of skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 269: E443–E450, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Perriello G, Nurjhan N, Stumvoll M, Bucci A, Welle S, Dailey G, Bier DM, Toft I, Jenssen TG, and Gerich JE. Regulation of gluconeogenesis by glutamine in normal postabsorptive humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 272: E437–E445, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Randle PJ, Garland PB, Hales CN, and Newsholme EA. The glucose fatty-acid cycle. Its role in insulin sensitivity and the metabolic disturbances of diabetes mellitus. Lancet 1: 785–789, 1963.[Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Richter EA, Garetto LP, Goodman MN, and Ruderman NB. Enhanced muscle glucose metabolism after exercise: modulation by local factors. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 246: E476–E482, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Roef MJ, de Meer K, Kalhan SC, Straver H, Berger R, and Reijngoud DJ. Gluconeogenesis in humans with induced hyperlactatemia during low-intensity exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 284: E1162–E1171, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Rose AJ, Howlett K, King DS, and Hargreaves M. Effect of prior exercise on glucose metabolism in trained men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 281: E766–E771, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Rowbottom DG, Keast D, and Morton AR. The emerging role of glutamine as an indicator of exercise stress and overtraining. Sports Med 21: 80–97, 1996.[Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Stumvoll M, Perriello G, Meyer C, and Gerich J. Role of glutamine in human carbohydrate metabolism in kidney and other tissues. Kidney Int 55: 778–792, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Trimmer JK, Schwarz JM, Casazza GA, Horning MA, Rodriguez N, and Brooks GA. Measurement of gluconeogenesis in exercising men by mass isotopomer distribution analysis. J Appl Physiol 93: 233–241, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Varnier M, Leese GP, Thompson J, and Rennie MJ. Stimulatory effect of glutamine on glycogen accumulation in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 269: E309–E315, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Wasserman DH and Cherrington AD. Hepatic fuel metabolism during muscular work: role and regulation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 260: E811–E824, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Wasserman DH, Geer RJ, Rice DE, Bracy D, Flakoll PJ, Brown LL, Hill JO, and Abumrad NN. Interaction of exercise and insulin action in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 260: E37–E45, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Wasserman DH, Lacy DB, Bracy D, and Williams PE. Metabolic regulation in peripheral tissues and transition to increased gluconeogenic mode during prolonged exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 263: E345–E354, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
A Bassini-Cameron, A Monteiro, A Gomes, J P S Werneck-de-Castro, and L Cameron
Glutamine protects against increases in blood ammonia in football players in an exercise intensity-dependent way
Br. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2008; 42(4): 260 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
S. Iwashita, C. Mikus, S. Baier, and P. J. Flakoll
Glutamine Supplementation Increases Postprandial Energy Expenditure and Fat Oxidation in Humans
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, March 1, 2006; 30(2): 76 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/5/1858    most recent
00305.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iwashita, S.
Right arrow Articles by Flakoll, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iwashita, S.
Right arrow Articles by Flakoll, P. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.