Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 99: 1802-1815, 2005. First published July 28, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00278.2005
8750-7587/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Supplementary Date
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/5/1802    most recent
00278.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dempsey, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dempsey, J. A.

Effects of augmented respiratory muscle pressure production on locomotor limb venous return during calf contraction exercise

Jordan D. Miller, David F. Pegelow, Anthony J. Jacques, and Jerome A. Dempsey

John Rankin Laboratory of Pulmonary Medicine, Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin

Submitted 8 March 2005 ; accepted in final form 12 July 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
We determined effects of augmented inspiratory and expiratory intrathoracic pressure or abdominal pressure (Pab) excursions on within-breath changes in steady-state femoral venous blood flow (fv) and net fv during tightly controlled (total breath time = 4 s, duty cycle = 0.5) accessory muscle/"rib cage" ({Delta}Pab <2 cmH2O) or diaphragmatic ({Delta}Pab >5 cmH2O) breathing. Selectively augmenting inspiratory intrathoracic pressure excursion during rib cage breathing augmented inspiratory facilitation of fv from the resting limb (69% and 89% of all flow occurred during nonloaded and loaded inspiration, respectively); however, net fv in the steady state was not altered because of slight reductions in femoral venous return during the ensuing expiratory phase of the breath. Selectively augmenting inspiratory esophageal pressure excursion during a predominantly diaphragmatic breath at rest did not alter within-breath changes in fv relative to nonloaded conditions (net retrograde flow = –9 ± 12% and –4 ± 9% during nonloaded and loaded inspiration, respectively), supporting the notion that the inferior vena cava is completely collapsed by relatively small increases in gastric pressure. Addition of inspiratory + expiratory loading to diaphragmatic breathing at rest resulted in reversal of within-breath changes in fv, such that >90% of all anterograde fv occurred during inspiration. Inspiratory + expiratory loading also reduced steady-state fv during mild- and moderate-intensity calf contractions compared with inspiratory loading alone. We conclude that 1) exaggerated inspiratory pressure excursions may augment within-breath changes in femoral venous return but do not increase net fv in the steady state and 2) active expiration during diaphragmatic breathing reduces the steady-state hyperemic response to dynamic exercise by mechanically impeding venous return from the locomotor limb, which may contribute to exercise limitation in health and disease.

blood flow; breathing mechanics; expiratory flow limitation; Starling resistor


DURING MODERATE-INTENSITY locomotor exercise, ventilatory mechanics are changed in three major ways: 1) the magnitude of the inspiratory and expiratory intrathoracic pressure (ITP) excursions is increased, resulting in increases in airflow and tidal volume (VT), 2) transverse intercostal muscle contraction facilitates expansion of the rib cage during inspiration, which spares diaphragmatic shortening and minimizes inspiratory increases in abdominal pressure (Pab) and diaphragmatic work (3), and 3) expiration becomes active, which forces end-expiratory lung volume below functional residual capacity and serves to keep the diaphragm near its optimum length (10). In patients with obstructive lung disease (1) or chronic heart failure (4), inspiratory and expiratory pressures may be exaggerated even at rest and may become more pronounced during even mild-intensity exercise (19, 20).

Although there is a large body of literature examining the effects of changes in production of respiratory muscle pressure on cardiovascular function in resting and/or anesthetized animals, our understanding of the cardiovascular consequences of these changes in breathing mechanics during exercise, when the skeletal muscle pumps are rhythmically forcing blood centrally, remains unclear. More specifically, previous studies measuring femoral venous blood velocity have suggested that more-negative inspiratory ITP excursions are significant, independent contributors to increases in locomotor limb venous return during exercise in humans (11, 21). However, previous work from our laboratory showed that changes in breathing pattern do not appear to contribute significantly to the increases in locomotor limb venous blood flow during calf contraction exercise in the semirecumbent human, although they exert a significant within-breath modulatory effect on femoral venous return (15). However, we did not alter the magnitude of the inspiratory ITP excursion above resting eupneic levels, and passive expiration was maintained.

Other studies that have attempted to address the role of the "respiratory pump" in the cardiovascular response to dynamic exercise in healthy subjects used voluntary hyperventilation, transient augmented VT, or inspiratory loading to augment the inspiratory and/or expiratory ITP and Pab excursions. However, indirect estimates of pulmonary blood flow (2, 5), estimates of locomotor limb venous blood flow that did not adequately control for changes in venous vessel cross-sectional area (11, 21), confounding effects of changes in arterial CO2 on local arteriolar tone (6, 13), and loosely controlled breathing mechanics have precluded determination of the effects of the augmented inspiratory and expiratory ITP excursions on the return of blood from the locomotor limb to the heart. Also, because in many investigations the subjects were supine (11, 21), application of the results to the upright, exercising human is difficult at best (see DISCUSSION).

In contrast to healthy subjects, the ventilatory responses to exercise in patients with obstructive pulmonary disease have been hypothesized to impede venous return at rest and during exercise (25). However, the experimental data to support this postulation are sparse and are primarily derived from observations in healthy humans and animals subjected to high levels of positive-pressure ventilation (>10 cmH2O) (9, 17). Although cardiac output and stroke volume are depressed with positive-pressure ventilation, the intervention does not mimic naturally occurring breathing mechanics at rest or during exercise, and effectiveness of the limb skeletal muscle pump, which serves to force blood centrally and maintain locomotor limb venous return (8), has not been examined under conditions of augmented respiratory muscle pressure production.

The present investigation was designed to test the following two hypotheses: 1) Augmented inspiratory ITP excursions during rib cage or diaphragm breathing will not increase blood flow from the resting or exercising locomotor limb. 2) Active expiration during diaphragmatic breathing will reduce locomotor limb venous return in the steady state because of increases in resistance to locomotor limb venous drainage. This effect on steady-state blood flow will occur, even in the presence of an active skeletal muscle pump, forcing blood centrally during calf contraction.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
General Procedures

Five men, 25 ± 6 yr of age and of normal weight (88 ± 8 kg) and height (184 ± 4 cm), served as subjects after providing written informed consent. All subjects were normotensive and free from cardiovascular and pulmonary disease. All experimental procedures and protocols were approved by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Health Sciences Human Research Review Committee and conformed with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Subjects breathed through a mouthpiece connected to a nonrebreathing valve with the nose occluded. Airflow rates, VT, mouth pressure, and end-tidal PCO2 were measured using equipment and techniques described previously (23). Gastric and esophageal balloons (Ackrad, Cranford, NJ) were placed in the stomach and lower third of the esophagus for estimation of Pab and ITP, respectively. Electromyogram recordings were obtained from surface electrodes placed on the right quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles to ensure quiescence of the upper thigh muscles and consistent activation of the calf muscles during contraction. Rib cage and abdominal excursions were measured using a direct-current-coupled respiratory inductive plethysmograph (Respitrace, Ambulatory Monitoring, Ardsley, NY). Blood pressure was measured beat-by-beat using the finger photoplethysmography technique (Finapres model 2300, Ohmeda, Englewood, CO), and drift was corrected at 1-min intervals using an automated sphygmomanometer (Dinamap model 1846 SX/P, Critikon, Tampa, FL) to determine mean arterial pressure (MAP = \?\1/3 pulse pressure + diastolic pressure).

Measurement of Locomotor Limb Blood Flow

Femoral arterial and venous blood flows (fa and fv) were measured as described in detail previously (15). Briefly, blood velocity was measured in the femoral vein, proximal to the vena profunda and distal to the saphenous vein, using a Doppler ultrasound system (Image Point Hx, Hewlett-Packard, Andover, MA). During a separate trial, venous cross-sectional images were continuously acquired, and vessel cross-sectional area was measured at end expiration and end inspiration at 1-min intervals using planimetry software incorporated into our ultrasound system (see online video associated with Ref. 15). This approach eliminates the use of assumptions regarding vessel geometry. Because of continuous changes in vessel cross-sectional area over the course of a breath, linear interpolation was used to estimate the instantaneous venous cross-sectional area over the course of a breath. The within-subject, within-trial coefficients of variation for mean fv and the fraction of fv during inspiration (fv,I/fv,T) averaged 10 ± 1% and 7 ± 1%, respectively (see supplemental information at http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/00278.2005/DC1 for reproducibility during each condition).

In a separate trial, arterial blood velocity was measured in the superficial femoral artery using the same Doppler ultrasound system. Arterial blood velocity and vessel diameter (d) were acquired during the same trial, and arterial cross-sectional area was calculated from the longitudinal arterial vessel image at the point of peak arterial blood velocity at 1-min intervals as follows: {pi}(d/2)2.

Instantaneous arterial and venous blood flow were calculated as the product of blood velocity and the interpolated value for vessel cross-sectional area at 100 equally spaced points over the course of a breath. Arterial limb vascular conductance was calculated as fa/MAP.

Breathing Pattern

During rib cage breathing, subjects were instructed to inspire using predominantly their accessory inspiratory muscles, such that the inspiratory change in gastric pressure (Pga) during inspiration was <3 cmH2O. During diaphragmatic breathing, subjects were instructed to inspire such that the diaphragm descended and forced an outward excursion of the abdominal wall during inspiration and a concomitant inspiratory increase in Pga of ≥5 cmH2O. Breathing frequency was set at 15 breaths/min with a duty cycle of 0.50. Pga and esophageal pressure (Pes) changes over the course of a breath were monitored closely throughout the study to ensure that the pressure waveform was uniform across breaths, the ITP excursions were comparable between rib cage and diaphragm breathing, and the breath timing and breathing patterns conformed to the instructions given to the subjects at the beginning of the study. Although VT was not controlled specifically, the subjects were encouraged to maintain similar VT and end-expiratory lung volume across rib cage and diaphragm breathing.

Exaggeration of the Inspiratory Pes Excursion

To examine the effects of an increased inspiratory Pes excursion alone, the magnitude of the inspiratory Pes excursion was increased by application of a fixed inspiratory resistance (~12 cmH2O·l–1·s–1) during rib cage or diaphragm breathing (n = 5 subjects; Fig. 1, A and B; see supplemental information at http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/00278.2005/DC1 for a schematic of the order of testing). Subjects were instructed to exhale passively and maintain similar VT and operating lung volumes (relative to nonloaded breathing conditions) during the inspiratory loaded portions of the trials.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Raw data traces show venous blood velocity, mean arterial pressure, mouth pressure, gastric and esophageal pressure (Pga and Pes), calf force, and airflow during moderate calf contraction. Inspiration (I) is denoted by shaded areas and downward deflection in airflow; peak calf force produced by the subject under these conditions is ~11 kg (elevation in baseline force during relaxation is due to an elastic cord pulling the foot against a metal bar positioned to achieve 90° ankle dorsiflexion with complete calf relaxation). Femoral venous blood velocity was markedly reduced during inspiration in nonloaded diaphragmatic (Dia) breathing (downward arrows in A). Addition of a fixed inspiratory resistance (IR, ~37 cmH2O·l–1·s) more than doubled the magnitude of the inspiratory Pes excursion (with no further effect on inspiratory Pga excursion) but did not significantly affect within-breath modulation of femoral venous blood flow (fv). Addition of a fixed inspiratory resistance and a 10-cmH2O expiratory threshold load (ER) to diaphragmatic breathing significantly increased inspiratory and expiratory (E) Pes excursions and reversed within-breath modulation of fv, such that the majority of anterograde blood flow occurred during the inspiratory phase of the breath (upward arrows in C).

 
Exaggeration of Inspiratory and Expiratory Pes and Pga Excursions

During diaphragmatic breathing, a fixed inspiratory resistance was again used to increase the magnitude of the inspiratory Pes excursion. The expiratory Pes and Pab excursions were increased by addition of an expiratory threshold valve set to open at 10 cmH2O. Subjects (n = 4) were instructed to exhale actively against the expiratory load and maintain similar VT and operating lung volumes (relative to nonloaded breathing conditions) during the combined inspiratory and expiratory loaded portions of the trials (see supplemental information for a schematic of the order of testing). Despite verbal encouragement to do otherwise, one subject persistently responded to the expiratory loading with pronounced hyperinflation, making the Pga waveform qualitatively similar to that observed during diaphragmatic breathing alone, and was excluded from further analysis.

Calf Contraction

The subjects were placed in a semirecumbent (~45°) position, with knees extended and parallel to the floor. They performed plantar flexion exercise, with the range of motion limited by two adjustable metal bars. The subjects were instructed to lightly touch the distal bar during plantar flexion and maintain a consistent level of force production with each contraction. The force generated by the subject during calf contraction could be altered by addition or removal of elastic bands (7 or 11 kg of peak force). The calf was contracted at a frequency of 30 min–1 with a duty cycle of 0.50, which allowed for synchronization of contraction with the onset of inspiration and expiration (i.e., 1 contraction cycle occurred during inspiration and 1 during expiration).

Data Analysis

Composite waveforms were generated over the course of each breath for each variable by sampling each variable at 100 equally spaced points over the course of a breath and averaging these values for each 5-min condition. A repeated-measures ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test was used to detect differences in the mean values of each variable during inspiration and expiration between rib cage and diaphragm breathing with and without inspiratory and expiratory loading and across different levels of calf contraction.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Effects of Exaggerated Inspiratory ITP Excursions on fa and Femoral Arterial Vascular Conductance at Rest and During Mild and Moderate Calf Contraction

Across all resting and calf contraction conditions, augmentation of the inspiratory ITP excursion did not elicit significant within-breath changes in fa or femoral arterial vascular conductance, nor did it affect these variables in the steady state (Figs. 25).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effects of augmenting inspiratory intrathoracic pressure (ITP) excursion during rib cage breathing on femoral arterial flow (fa), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and fv over the course of a breath at rest (n = 5, ≥60 breaths per subject per condition). Increasing the magnitude of the inspiratory Pes excursion significantly increased mean inspiratory fv but did not change fa. {circ}, Nonloaded rib cage breathing; {bullet}, inspiratory loaded rib cage breathing. *P < 0.05, nonloaded rib cage breathing vs. inspiratory loaded rib cage breathing.

 


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effects of augmenting inspiratory ITP excursion during diaphragmatic breathing on fa, MAP, and fv over the course of a breath during moderate calf contraction (n = 5, ≥60 breaths per subject per condition). Moderate-intensity calf contraction elicited a small but significant increase in mean fv during inspiration over that observed at rest (P < 0.05 for nonloaded and inspiratory-loaded conditions); mean expiratory fv always remained significantly higher than mean inspiratory fv (P < 0.05, mean inspiratory fv vs. mean expiratory fv for nonloaded and inspiratory loaded conditions). {circ}, Nonloaded diaphragm breathing; {bullet}, inspiratory loaded diaphragm breathing. *P < 0.05, nonloaded diaphragm breathing vs. inspiratory loaded diaphragm breathing.

 
Effects of an Exaggerated Inspiratory ITP Excursion on fv During Rib Cage Breathing at Rest and During Calf Contraction

The signal-averaged, quantitative data for all subjects at rest and during moderate calf contraction are shown in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively; results during mild calf contraction are reported in Table 1. The subjects were able to significantly increase the magnitude of their inspiratory Pes excursion (P < 0.05) during rib cage breathing with inspiratory loading, whereas Pab was relatively unchanged. The addition of mild- or moderate-intensity calf contraction elicited signficant increases in mean fv over resting conditions (P < 0.05; Table 1).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effects of augmenting inspiratory ITP excursion during rib cage breathing on fa, MAP, and fv over the course of a breath during moderate calf contraction (n = 5, ≥60 breaths per subject per condition). Although addition of an inspiratory load elicited changes in the magnitude of the inspiratory Pes and Pga excursion similar to those observed at rest, inspiratory facilitation of fv was only modestly augmented by addition of an inspiratory load [within-breath changes in fv were significant only during inspiratory loaded conditions (P < 0.05) for mean inspiratory fv vs. mean expiratory fv]. {circ}, Nonloaded rib cage breathing; {bullet}, inspiratory loaded rib cage breathing. *P < 0.05, nonloaded rib cage breathing vs. inspiratory loaded rib cage breathing.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Group mean fv responses to diaphragm and rib-cage breathing at rest and during calf exercise

 
During nonloaded rib cage breathing at rest and at both levels of calf contraction, fv tended to be slightly higher during early inspiration than during expiration, although this effect was not sustained throughout inspiration and was not sufficient to elicit a significant difference between mean inspiratory and mean expiratory fv (Figs. 2 and 3). When the inspiratory ITP excursion was augmented, however, mean inspiratory fv became significantly higher than mean fv during the ensuing expiratory phase of the breath at rest and during both levels of calf contraction. However, the extent to which further reductions in ITP during inspiration could facilitate anterograde fv was noticeably greater at rest than during mild- and moderate-intensity calf contraction (Figs. 1 and 3, Table 1). Despite the consistent inspiratory facilitation of fv by an augmented inspiratory ITP excursion, steady-state fv from the resting and contracting limb was not significantly different between nonloaded and inspiratory-loaded rib cage breathing because of consistent reductions in mean expiratory fv [i.e., no net effect on steady-state fv over the course of >50 complete respiratory cycles (Table 1)].

Effects of Exaggerated Inspiratory ITP Excursions on fv During Diaphragmatic Breathing at Rest and During Calf Contraction

The signal-averaged, quantitative data for all subjects at rest and during moderate calf contraction are shown in Figs. 4 and 5, respectively; results during moderate calf contraction are reported in Table 1. The subjects were able to significantly increase the magnitude of their inspiratory Pes excursion during diaphragmatic breathing with inspiratory loading (P < 0.05), whereas the magnitude of the Pga excursion was relatively unchanged. The addition of mild or moderate calf contraction elicited significant increases in fv over resting conditions (P < 0.01; Table 1).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effects of augmenting inspiratory ITP excursion during diaphragmatic breathing on fa, MAP, and fv over the course of a breath at rest (n = 5, ≥60 breaths per subject per condition). Selectively augmenting the Pes excursion did not affect inspiratory reductions in fv or expiratory resurgence of fv during nonloaded diaphragmatic breathing (P < 0.05, mean inspiratory fv vs. mean expiratory fv during nonloaded and inspiratory loaded conditions). {circ}, Nonloaded diaphragm breathing; {bullet}, inspiratory loaded diaphragm breathing. *P < 0.05, nonloaded diaphragm breathing vs. inspiratory loaded diaphragm breathing.

 
fv showed significant within-breath variation during nonloaded diaphragmatic breathing at rest (Fig. 4) and during mild (Table 1) and moderate (Fig. 5) calf contraction, such that mean fv was significantly lower during inspiration than during the ensuing expiratory phase of a nonloaded diaphragmatic breath (P < 0.05 for all). However, more than doubling the magnitude of the inspiratory Pes excursion (while leaving the inspiratory {Delta}Pga unchanged) did not affect the magnitude or qualitative characteristics of the within-breath changes in fv during diaphragmatic breathing at rest (Fig. 4) or during mild (Table 1) or moderate (Fig. 5) calf contraction. Furthermore, neither level of calf contraction significantly increased mean fv during a nonloaded diaphragmatic inspiration over that observed at rest (P = not significant; Table 1), and mean inspiratory fv remained significantly lower than that observed during rib cage breathing at the same intensity of calf contraction (P < 0.01).

Effects of Augmented Inspiratory and Expiratory ITP Excursions on fv During Predominantly Diaphragmatic Breathing at Rest and During Calf Contraction

The signal-averaged, quantitative data for all subjects at rest and during moderate calf contraction are shown in Figs. 6 and 7, respectively; results during moderate calf contraction are reported in Table 2. The addition of combined inspiratory and expiratory loading to diaphragmatic breathing in the remaining subjects significantly lowered the mean inspiratory Pes (P < 0.05), while the mean inspiratory Pga was unchanged; during expiration, we observed significant increases in mean expiratory Pes and mean expiratory Pga (P < 0.05; Figs. 6 and 7).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Effects of combined inspiratory and expiratory loading (EL) during diaphragmatic breathing on fv over the course of a breath at rest (n = 4, ≥60 breaths per subject per condition). Addition of combined inspiratory and expiratory loading to diaphragmatic breathing reversed within-breath changes in fv, such that the majority of anterograde blood flow occurred during the inspiratory phase of the breath (P < 0.05, mean inspiratory fv vs. mean expiratory fv during combined inspiratory and expiratory loaded diaphragm breathing). {circ}, Nonloaded diaphragm breathing; {bullet}, combined inspiratory and expiratory loaded diaphragm breathing. *P < 0.05, nonloaded diaphragm breathing vs. combined inspiratory and expiratory loaded rib cage breathing.

 


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Effects of inspiratory nonloaded and combined inspiratory and expiratory loaded diaphragmatic breathing on fv over the course of a breath during moderate calf contraction (n = 4, ≥60 breaths per subject per condition). Compared with nonloaded diaphragmatic breathing, the addition of combined inspiratory and expiratory loading to diaphragmatic breathing reversed the within-breath changes in fv, such that the majority of anterograde blood flow occurred during the inspiratory phase of the breath (P < 0.05, mean inspiratory fv vs. mean expiratory fv during combined inspiratory and expiratory loaded diaphragm breathing). {circ}, Nonloaded diaphragm breathing; {bullet}, combined inspiratory and expiratory loaded diaphragm breathing. *P < 0.05, nonloaded diaphragm breathing vs. combined inspiratory and expiratory loaded rib cage breathing.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Group mean fv responses to combined inspiratory and expiratory loading during diaphragm breathing at rest and during calf exercise

 
In contrast to diaphragmatic breathing during passive expiration, expiratory loading during diaphragmatic breathing significantly lowered mean expiratory fv at rest (Fig. 6) and during mild (Table 1) and moderate (Fig. 7) calf contraction (P < 0.05 vs. mean expiratory fv when expiration was passive for all). Additionally, mean inspiratory fv was significantly higher during expiratory loaded diaphragm breathing than during passive expiration at rest and during both levels of calf contraction (P < 0.05, expiratory load vs. no expiratory load for all; Figs. 6 and 7, Table 1). Consequently, the within-breath modulation of fv was directionally opposite during nonloaded and expiratory loaded diaphragmatic breathing, such that the majority of anterograde flow occurred during inspiration when expiration was active (Figs. 6 and 7; fv,I/fv,T in Table 2).

In the steady state (i.e., over the course of >50 complete respiratory cycles), fv at rest tended to be slightly lower during expiratory loading but was not significantly different from nonloaded diaphragmatic breathing at rest (Table 2). In contrast, addition of an expiratory load to diaphragmatic breathing significantly blunted the increase in steady-state blood flow in response to mild and moderate calf contraction (P < 0.05 vs. inspiratory loading alone; Fig. 8). Steady-state fv was reduced at both intensities of calf contraction, despite the presence of a small but nonsignificant pressor response with the addition of an expiratory load (P = not significant vs. inspiratory loading alone). Accordingly, the blunted hyperemic response to calf contraction exercise was mediated by significant reductions in vascular conductance (P < 0.05 vs. inspiratory loading alone; Table 2, Fig. 8).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Effects of nonloaded, inspiratory loaded, and combined inspiratory and expiratory loaded diaphragm breathing on steady-state fv and locomotor limb vascular conductance at rest and during mild and moderate calf contraction. Addition of combined inspiratory and expiratory loading during diaphragmatic breathing significantly reduced fv and locomotor limb vascular conductance compared with inspiratory loading alone during both levels of calf contraction. During inspiratory and expiratory loading, only moderate levels of calf contraction significantly increased limb blood flow over the combined inspiratory and expiratory loaded resting conditions. *Significantly different from inspiratory resistance at the same level of calf contraction (P < 0.05). #Signficantly different from rest under the same breathing conditions (P < 0.05). {dagger}Significantly different from nonloaded breathing at the same level of calf contraction (P < 0.05).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The main findings of this study can be summarized as follows: 1) More-negative inspiratory ITP excursions increased the inspiratory facilitation of fv during rib cage, but not diaphragm, breathing patterns. 2) More-negative inspiratory ITP excursions were unable to significantly increase steady-state fv during rib cage breathing because of reductions in fv during the ensuing expiratory phase of the breath. 3) Addition of an expiratory load reversed the within-breath modulation of fv during diaphragm breathing, such that the majority of femoral venous return occurred during the initial portion of a diaphragmatic inspiration. 4) Addition of an expiratory load to diaphragm breathing significantly reduced steady-state fv during mild and moderate calf contraction.

Respiratory Influences on Locomotor Limb Inflow and Outflow: A Model Based on Resistors and Capacitors in Series

The model is based on the principles governing the current flow through an electrical capacitor. Our approach relies on a physiological analog to the constitutive relation equations for flow through an electrical capacitor, which states that the change in blood flow through any capacitance vessel bed will be proportional to the rate of change of the driving pressure across it and its capacitance. The general structure of our model is depicted in Fig. 9.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Schematic showing likely effects of breathing pattern and magnitude of respiratory muscle pressure excursion on driving pressures and vascular resistances for venous return from the resting locomotor limb. Equations show components of key variables determining flow through a given capacitance bed. Ca, arterial vascular compliance; Pa, arterial pressure; Ra, resistance to arterial inflow; fa, femoral arterial blood flow; Ccalf, calf venous compliance; Pcalf, calf venous pressure; Ptiss, tissue pressure exerted on the veins; popliteal and pop, popliteal venous blood flow; Cfv, femoral venous vascular compliance; Pfv, femoral venous pressure; fv, femoral venous blood flow; CIVC, inferior vena caval (IVC) compliance; RIVC, IVC resistance to venous blood flow; PIHIVC, infrahepatic IVC pressure; PSHIVC, suprahepatic IVC pressure; Pabd, abdominal pressure; PITP, intrathoracic pressure; Pra, right atrial pressure; Prv, right ventricular pressure; Cra, right atrial compliance; EIVC, IVC elastance; Pcrit,IVC, critical closing pressure of the IVC; {tau}fv, time constant for the femoral venous vascular bed; {tau}calf, time constant for the calf venous vascular bed.

 
To interpret our present findings in the context of the model outlined in Fig. 9, we make the following two simplifying assumptions: 1) right atrial pressure (Pra) is always reduced during inspiration (resulting from a more-negative right atrial transmural pressure as a result of reductions in ITP), and 2) splanchnic venous return is always reduced during inspiration because of compression of the hepatic sinusoids resulting from diaphragmatic contraction (16). Because the nonloaded conditions have been discussed in the context of this model elsewhere (15), we focus more on the findings from the exaggerated respiratory muscle pressure production.

Within-Breath Modulation of fv During Inspiratory Loading: Regulation of fv by Passive Venous Properties and "Starling" Resistors

Rib cage breathing.   In this study, augmenting the inspiratory ITP excursion elicited a greater inspiratory facilitation of fv during loaded than during nonloaded rib cage breathing, such that mean fv during inspiration was significantly greater than mean fv during expiration in inspiratory-loaded conditions. Inasmuch as Pab was relatively unchanged during inspiratory-loaded rib cage breathing, this initial inspiratory facilitation is the result of a lower Pra secondary to the more-negative inspiratory ITP excursion.

However, during the latter portion of a rib cage inspiration, the magnitude of the inspiratory facilitation of fv became dissociated from the change in ITP, as fv progressively fell in the face of a more-negative ITP (Figs. 2 and 3). There are two possible explanations for this progressive decrement in anterograde fv: 1) a decrease in the effective driving pressure for venous return and/or 2) an increase in the resistance for venous return.

First, a loss of peripheral venous recoil due to a central translocation of blood volume from the upper thigh early during inspiration would reduce the effective upstream driving pressure for venous return from the locomotor limb (15, 22), a phenomenon reflected in our reductions in femoral venous cross-sectional area over the course of a rib cage inspiration (Table 1). However, this is not likely to be the sole contributor to the progressive decrements in fv during the latter portion of a rib cage inspiration, because end-inspiratory femoral venous cross-sectional area was not further reduced by augmentation of the inspiratory ITP excursion.

Thus we postulate that increases in resistance to outflow (RIVC in Fig. 9) are most likely to contribute to the reductions in fv during the latter portions of a loaded rib cage inspiration. The partial collapse of the suprahepatic abdominal inferior vena cava (IVC) and/or intrathoracic IVC, which is consistently found when the magnitude of the inspiratory ITP excursion is augmented (7, 18), would limit the transmission of reductions in Pra to the infrahepatic IVC (i.e., because infrahepatic IVC pressure can be considered a more immediate downstream pressure for locomotor limb venous return; Fig. 9) and ultimately limit the increase in effective driving pressure for locomotor limb venous return under these breathing conditions. Increases in abdominal IVC resistance due solely to reductions in ITP (and, subsequently, Pra and intravascular pressure) also are consistent with our observation that the effectiveness of the skeletal muscle pump is unaffected under these conditions, inasmuch as, by definition, flow through a patent Starling resistor will be proportional to the change in upstream driving pressure (Pfv in Fig. 9).

Diaphragm breathing.   The finding that a more-negative inspiratory ITP excursion during diaphragm breathing did not further alter the magnitude of the within-breath changes in fv at rest or during calf contraction (Figs. 4 and 5) provides strong evidence that modest increases in Pab exceed the critical closing pressure of the abdominal IVC and that the abdominal IVC is fully collapsed during a diaphragmatic inspiration (15, 27, 29). Furthermore, our observation that the increases in mean inspiratory fv elicited by moderate calf contraction were not affected by the magnitude of the inspiratory ITP excursion during diaphragmatic breathing suggests that a more-negative inspiratory ITP excursion (in the presence of an identical Pab excursion) does not affect the critical femoral venous driving pressure required to open the abdominal IVC (Fig. 9).

Our finding that net fv in the steady state was not altered by the magnitude of the inspiratory ITP excursion is inconsistent with the findings of Kwon et al. (11), who concluded that "deep" diaphragmatic breathing increases steady-state venous return from the locomotor limb. However, these investigators failed to control for changes in venous vessel cross-sectional area and, thus, relied solely on velocimetric estimates of blood flow (11). Our data clearly show that femoral venous cross-sectional area changes significantly over the course of a breath (often changing >20%) and must be taken into account to accurately measure venous blood flow. Hence, we would not agree with the recommendation of Kwon et al. that a combination of deep breathing and calf muscle contraction would be the most effective method for preventing venous stasis in patients subjected to prolonged bed rest (11), inasmuch as our data strongly suggest that steady-state venous return from the locomotor limb can be augmented only by muscular contraction, with augmented breathing doing little more than adding to patient discomfort and inconvenience.

Augmenting Inspiratory and Expiratory ITP Excursions Reverses Within-Breath Modulation of fv During Diaphragmatic Breathing

With the addition of an expiratory load to inspiratory-loaded diaphragmatic breathing, we observed a reversal of the within-breath modulation of fv from the resting limb, such that mean fv during inspiration was now significantly higher than during expiration. Even our highest level of calf contraction was not able to elicit a significant increase in mean expiratory fv over resting levels. Thus it would appear that, under conditions of active expiration, the impedance to outflow from the locomotor limb far exceeds the recoil pressure generated by distension of the calf and thigh veins, even when the veins are considerably distended by the presence of a hydrostatic column.

During the majority of the expiratory phase of an expiratory loaded breath, Pga and Pes change in parallel (Figs. 6 and 7). Thus we cannot state with certainty whether the near abolition of anterograde fv during expiration is the result of an elevated resistance to locomotor limb outflow in the abdomen (i.e., compression of the abdominal IVC by an elevated Pga) or an elevated backpressure to venous return in the thorax (i.e., an increase Pra due to an elevated ITP). However, the fact that anterograde fv remains virtually absent (and even slightly retrograde) during the transition from inspiration to expiration, where Pga is already elevated and Pes is still rising, provides evidence that the elevated Pab (and thus, IVC resistance in Fig. 9) is likely to be the dominant factor impeding fv.

Augmented Expiratory Pressure Production During Diaphragmatic Breathing Reduces Steady-State Locomotor Limb Venous Return During Calf Contraction

In contrast to our observation that steady-state fv was unaffected by the magnitude of the inspiratory ITP excursions during diaphragmatic breathing, the addition of combined inspiratory and expiratory loading during diaphragmatic breathing resulted in significant reductions in net, steady-state fv and vascular conductance at both levels of calf contraction (Fig. 8). In essence, the decreased fv during an inspiratory-loaded diaphragmatic inspiration remained low during the ensuing active, loaded expiratory effort (Figs. 6 and 7).

Although some may ascribe the reductions in steady-state blood flow and vascular conductance with expiratory loading to reflex vasoconstriction (23, 24), our observation that femoral venous return was abolished over the last three-quarters of a breath strongly suggests a direct mechanical component to this observation. More specifically, because our subjects' limb veins were relatively distended because of their semirecumbent body position, the blocking of venous outflow by addition of an expiratory load to diaphragmatic breathing would ultimately narrow the effective driving pressure across the capillary bed by increasing effective downstream pressure (i.e., postcapillary/venular pressure) in the steady state. This effect has frequently been referred to as a change in "virtual conductance"1 (12), because it is not possible to measure the effective downstream pressure for the arterial circulation at rest and during calf contraction.

Implications for Femoral Venous Return During Whole Body Exercise

Our finding that steady-state fv is not increased with augmented inspiratory muscle pressure excursions differs from several previous investigations that have suggested that augmented inspiratory ITP excursions can independently contribute to increases in steady-state venous return in the resting human (2, 5). Our data show that any increases in venous return (and, presumably, in turn, cardiac output) with augmented inspiratory ITP excursions are not originating from the locomotor limb. These findings are consistent with our working model, suggesting that augmented inspiratory ITP excursions cannot increase steady-state blood flow without additional changes in the physical properties of the vasculature, such as concomitant reductions in venous compliance and/or regional vascular time constants (15).

In contrast, our findings are consistent with a growing body of data supporting the notion that excessive expiratory muscle pressure production limits whole body venous return and cardiac output during stationary cycling (14, 26). The possibility that these reductions in cardiac output resulting from augmented expiratory muscle pressure production may be the result of an impeded locomotor limb blood flow is supported by the observation that the limb blood flow response to incremental exercise is often significantly blunted in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (25). In such patients, expiratory flow limitation and dynamic hyperinflation result in more-positive Pab during inspiration and expiration (1), breathing mechanics that are very similar to those produced by combined inspiratory and expiratory loading during diaphragmatic breathing in the present investigation. The hypothesis that locomotor limb venous return may be mechanically constrained in these patients is particularly attractive, given the fact that their ITP and Pab excursions are augmented at very low workloads (i.e., in the presence of a relatively weak skeletal muscle pump).

Limitations in Application of Our Findings to Whole Body Exercise

Perhaps the greatest limitation in applying the present findings to whole body exercise is that our subjects performed only calf contraction exercise, whereas whole body exercise typically involves rhythmic contraction of the muscles of the upper thigh. Thus one may expect to see a smaller within-breath variation in fv during all the breathing conditions described here, inasmuch as quadriceps contraction would result in significant decreases in thigh venous compliance (Fig. 9) and increases in femoral venous driving pressure (Fig. 9). Additionally, locomotor and respiratory muscle contraction is frequently asynchronous during whole body exercise; however, the effects of muscle contraction at different points throughout the breathing cycle can be predicted by applying a time component to the equations in Fig. 9.

Despite these limitations, data from Wexler et al. (28) demonstrated respiratory modulation of IVC blood velocity during supine cycling with spontaneous breathing in normal, healthy humans. Thus the within-breath and steady-state effects of augmented ITP and Pab excursions during inspiration and expiration on fv in the present investigation may still be significant during whole body exercise. This may especially be the case during maximal exercise, where peak inspiratory and expiratory pressures are larger than those produced in the present investigation (ITP excursions of ±30 cmH2O and Pga excursions from –10 cmH2O during inspiration to +30 cmH2O during expiration), filling time for the skeletal muscle pump is greatly reduced, and increases in arterial inflow (and thus venous filling rate) may no longer be allowed because of active sympathetic vasoconstriction in the locomotor limbs.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant RO1-HL-015469 and a Grant-in-Aid from the American Heart Association. J. D. Miller was supported as a predoctoral fellow by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant T32-HL-007654.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. D. Miller, University of Iowa, 3408 Eckstein Medical Research Building, Iowa City, IA 52242 (e-mail: jordan-miller{at}uiowa.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 The concept of a virtual vascular conductance was first proposed by Laughlin (12) in an attempt to explain the observation that the maximum pharmacologically induced vascular conductance is far less than that observed during high-intensity exercise. In particular, they postulated that, during the relaxation phase of dynamic exercise, the skeletal muscle pump significantly lowers postcapillary pressures by pulling outward on the venous vasculature, which would in turn widen the effective driving pressure for arterial inflow. Such a phenomenon would lead one to the incorrect conclusion that arteriolar diameter had increased and falsely elevated maximum vascular conductance during exercise. Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Aliverti A, Stevenson N, Dellaca RL, Lo Mauro A, Pedotti A, and Calverley PM. Regional chest wall volumes during exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 59: 210–216, 2004.
  2. Anholm JD, Johnson RL, and Ramanathan M. Changes in cardiac output during sustained maximal ventilation in humans. J Appl Physiol 63: 181–187, 1987.
  3. Babcock MA, Pegelow DF, Harms CA, and Dempsey JA. Effects of respiratory muscle unloading on exercise-induced diaphragm fatigue. J Appl Physiol 93: 201–206, 2002.
  4. Christie RV and Meakins JC. The intrapleural pressure in congestive heart failure and its clinical significance. J Clin Invest 323–345, 1934.
  5. Coast JR, Jensen RA, Cassidy SS, Ramanathan M, and Johnson RL Jr. Cardiac output and O2 consumption during inspiratory threshold loaded breathing. J Appl Physiol 64: 1624–1628, 1988.
  6. Donevan RE, Anderson NM, Sekelj P, Papp O, and McGregor M. Influence of voluntary hyperventilation on cardiac output. J Appl Physiol 17: 487–491, 1962.
  7. Doppman J, Rubinson RM, Rockoff SD, Vasko JS, Shapiro R, and Morrow AG. Mechanism of obstruction of the infradiaphragmatic portion of the inferior vena cava in the presence of increased intra-abdominal pressure. Invest Radiol 1: 37–53, 1966.
  8. Folkow B, Gaskell P, and Waaler BA. Blood flow through limb muscles during heavy rhythmic exercise. Acta Physiol Scand 80: 61–72, 1970.
  9. Genovese J, Moskowitz M, Tarasiuk A, Graver LM, and Scharf SM. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on cardiac output in normal and hypervolemic unanesthetized pigs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 150: 752–758, 1994.
  10. Johnson BD, Babcock MA, Suman OE, and Dempsey JA. Exercise-induced diaphragmatic fatigue in healthy humans. J Physiol 460: 385–405, 1993.
  11. Kwon OY, Jung DY, Kim Y, Cho SH, and Yi CH. Effects of ankle exercise combined with deep breathing on blood flow velocity in the femoral vein. Aust J Physiother 49: 253–258, 2003.
  12. Laughlin MH. Skeletal muscle blood flow capacity: role of muscle pump in exercise hyperemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 253: H993–H1004, 1987.
  13. McGregor M, Donevan RE, and Anderson NM. Influence of carbon dioxide and hyperventilation on cardiac output in man. J Appl Physiol 17: 933–937, 1962.
  14. Miller JD, Beck KC, Joyner MJ, Brice AG, and Johnson BD. Cardiorespiratory effects of inelastic chest wall restriction. J Appl Physiol 92: 2419–2428, 2002.
  15. Miller JD, Pegelow DF, Jacques AJ, and Dempsey JA. Skeletal muscle pump vs. respiratory muscle pump: modulation of venous return from the locomotor limb in humans. J Physiol 563: 925–943, 2005.
  16. Moreno AH, Burchell AR, Van der Woude R, and Burke JH. Respiratory regulation of splanchnic and systemic venous return. Am J Physiol 213: 455–465, 1967.
  17. Naughton MT, Rahman MA, Hara K, Floras JS, and Bradley TD. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on intrathoracic and left ventricular transmural pressures in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 91: 1725–1731, 1995.
  18. Norhagen A. Selective angiography of the hepatic veins—experimental investigation of basal circulatory dynamics. Acta Radiol 221: 1–121, 1964.
  19. O'Donnell DE. Ventilatory limitations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33: S647–S655, 2001.
  20. O'Donnell DE, D'Arsigny C, Raj S, Abdollah H, and Webb KA. Ventilatory assistance improves exercise endurance in stable congestive heart failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160: 1804–1811, 1999.
  21. Osada T, Katsumura T, Hamaoka T, Murase N, Naka M, and Shimomitsu T. Quantitative effects of respiration on venous return during single knee extension-flexion. Int J Sports Med 23: 183–190, 2002.
  22. Permutt S and Caldini P. Regulation of cardiac output by the circuit: venous return. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Cardiovascular System Dynamics, edited by Baan J, Noordergraaf A, and Raines J, Valley Forge, PA: MIT Press, 1978, p. 465–479.
  23. Sheel AW, Derchak PA, Morgan BJ, Pegelow DF, Jacques AJ, and Dempsey JA. Fatiguing inspiratory muscle work causes reflex reduction in resting leg blood flow in humans. J Physiol 537: 277–289, 2001.
  24. Sheel AW, Derchak PA, Pegelow DF, and Dempsey JA. Threshold effects of respiratory muscle work on limb vascular resistance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282: H1732–H1738, 2002.
  25. Simon M, LeBlanc P, Jobin J, Desmeules M, Sullivan MJ, and Maltais F. Limitation of lower limb O2 during cycling exercise in COPD patients. J Appl Physiol 90: 1013–1019, 2001.
  26. Stark-Leyva KN, Beck KC, and Johnson BD. Influence of expiratory loading and hyperinflation on cardiac output during exercise. J Appl Physiol 96: 1920–1927, 2004.
  27. Takata M, Wise RA, and Robotham JL. Effects of abdominal pressure on venous return: abdominal vascular zone conditions. J Appl Physiol 69: 1961–1972, 1990.
  28. Wexler L, Bergel DH, Gabe IT, Makin GS, and Mills CJ. Velocity of blood flow in normal human venae cavae. Circ Res 23: 349–359, 1968.
  29. Willeput R, Rondeux C, and De Troyer A. Breathing affects venous return from legs in humans. J Appl Physiol 57: 971–976, 1984.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. J. Taylor and L. M. Romer
Effect of expiratory muscle fatigue on exercise tolerance and locomotor muscle fatigue in healthy humans
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2008; 104(5): 1442 - 1451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. C. W. Hsia, D. M. Dane, A. S. Estrera, H. E. Wagner, P. D. Wagner, and R. L. Johnson Jr.
Shifting sources of functional limitation following extensive (70%) lung resection
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2008; 104(4): 1069 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. M. Romer and M. I. Polkey
Exercise-induced respiratory muscle fatigue: implications for performance
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2008; 104(3): 879 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Supplementary Date
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/5/1802    most recent
00278.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dempsey, J. A.
Right arrow