Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 99: 556-563, 2005. First published March 24, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00254.2005
8750-7587/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/556    most recent
00254.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearse, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sylvester, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pearse, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sylvester, J. T.

Effects of tidal volume and respiratory frequency on lung lymph flow

David B. Pearse,1 Robert M. Searcy,1 Wayne Mitzner,2 Solbert Permutt,1 and J. T. Sylvester1

1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, and 2Division of Physiology, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland

Submitted 4 March 2005 ; accepted in final form 21 March 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Ventilation () increases lung lymph flow (L), but the separate effects of tidal volume (VT) and frequency (f) and the role of -induced changes in edema formation are poorly understood. An isolated, in situ sheep lung preparation was used to examine these effects. In eight sheep with f = 10 min–1, results obtained during 30-min periods with VT = 5 or 20 ml/kg were compared with values obtained during bracketed 30-min control periods (VT = 12.5 ml/kg). Eight other sheep with constant VT (12.5 ml/kg) were studied at f = 5 or 20 min–1 and compared with f = 10 min–1. Three additional groups of six sheep were perfused for 100 min with control (10 ml/kg, 10 min–1). VT was then kept constant or changed to 20 or 3 ml/kg during a second 100-min period. Increases in VT or f increased L and vice versa, without corresponding effects on the rate of edema formation. For the same change in , changing VT had a greater effect on L than changing f. The change in L caused by an increase in VT was significantly greater after the accumulation of interstitial edema. The change in L caused by a sustained increase in VT was transient and did not correlate with the rate of edema formation, suggesting that altered L through direct mechanical effects on edema-filled compartments and lymphatic vessels rather than through -induced changes in fluid filtration.

pulmonary edema; sheep; lung fluid balance; lung interstitial space; edema clearance


LUNG LYMPH FLOW (L) has long been known to be affected by ventilation (), but the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood (1, 12, 13, 17, 26). For example, increases in tidal volume (VT) and respiratory frequency (f) caused by the addition of dead space (1) resulted in a small but persistent increase in lymph flow from the efferent duct of the caudal mediastinal lymph node in intact sheep. Using the same experimental preparation, Koizumi et al. (13) found large increases in L associated with the hyperpnea of exercise. They nicely demonstrated that the increased L with exercise required the combination of hyperpnea and an increased pulmonary capillary pressure. Hyperpnea alone had no effect on L, whereas an isolated elevation in pulmonary capillary pressure increased L by only a small amount (13). The large -induced increase in lymph flow in exercising animals was hypothesized to explain the ability of the lung to maintain normal extravascular lung water in the face of significant exercise-induced increases in pulmonary capillary pressures. These studies, however, were unable to determine the separate effects of changing VT and f. Moreover, lung lymph collected from the efferent duct of the caudal mediastinal lymph node may be contaminated with lymph from diaphragmatic lymphatics (5). The contribution of diaphragmatic lymph increases with diaphragmatic contraction (5) and thus could vary with the depth and rate of .

Less is known about the effect of on L in injured, edematous lungs. Studies designed to quantify L relative to total edema formation in animal models of acute pulmonary edema have concluded that lymph flow contributes little to overall edema clearance (9, 12, 14, 16, 23). L correlated with lung fluid filtration rate rather than total lung edema, suggesting that lymph flow drains a small perimicrovascular compartment close to the site of fluid filtration that is connected in series to a larger interstitial compartment surrounding the extra-alveolar vessels (6, 8, 12, 16, 25). The contribution of L to edema clearance in this situation may be underestimated, however, because these studies were performed with fixed levels of in anesthetized animals or isolated lungs. If a large increase in L results from the increased triggered by early pulmonary edema (13), L may play a more important role in overall edema clearance than previously realized. Moreover, the small perimicrovascular compartment drained by lymph flow may be important for gas exchange. Thus the relationship between and L in injured lungs may be relevant to the selection of ventilatory strategies designed to limit human ventilator-induced lung injury in the intensive care unit (7).

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the separate effects of VT and f on L and fluid balance in isolated, in situ, perfused sheep lungs (17), which become injured due to ischemia and reperfusion (20). In the initial description of this preparation, we found that L was directly proportional to f over a range of 0 to 30 min–1, but the separate effects of f and VT on L and fluid balance were not systematically examined (17). The major advantage of the isolated, perfused lung includes the ability to collect L without contamination by systemic lymph while controlling key physiological variables. In this paper, we first examine the effects of independently changing VT and f over the same range of but at different times during the course of edema formation. In a second group of experiments, changes in VT are followed for a longer time period to determine whether effects on L are transient or sustained.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Preparation

All animals received care in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health. The study protocol was approved by the Johns Hopkins Animal Care and Use Committee. Young sheep (20–30 kg) were anesthetized with intramuscular ketamine (30 mg/kg) and atropine (0.5 mg). Anesthesia was maintained by intravenous injections of ketamine (3–6 mg/kg) at 15- to 30-min intervals. A tracheostomy was performed, and mechanical ventilation was begun with oxygen-supplemented room air at a VT of 12.5 ml/kg and f of 15 min–1. A sternotomy was performed, and the superior thoracic duct was catheterized above the hilum of the left lung with silicone rubber tubing (inner diameter: 0.03 in.). Heparin (10,000 units) was then injected intravenously, and the animal was exsanguinated from a left atrial cannula into the perfusion reservoir. was maintained with warmed, humidified gas mixture containing 28% O2 and 5% CO2 at a f of 10 min–1 and end-expiratory tracheal pressure (Ptr) of 4 mmHg.

The pulmonary artery was cannulated and connected to an extracorporeal circuit described previously (17). After 30 min of ischemia, the lungs were perfused in situ at 100 ml·kg–1·min–1 with a mixture of autologous blood (~1,000 ml) and 3% dextran in Ringer lactate solution (~300 ml). The perfusate was warmed (38–39°C) with a heat exchanger (Travenol Miniprime) and continuously filtered of clots and bubbles with a filter. To prevent the transient pulmonary hypertension that normally occurs with extracorporeal perfusion of isolated sheep lungs (18–20), indomethacin (100 mg), dissolved in a mixture of normal saline (10 ml) and 1 N NaHCO3 (10 ml), was added to the perfusate in an amount sufficient to achieve a perfusate concentration of 20 µg/ml. Our laboratory previously showed that indomethacin has no effect on the vascular barrier dysfunction and edema resulting from ischemia and reperfusion in this preparation (4). Blood drained from the left atrium through a Starling resistor to a reservoir and pressure in the left atrial cannula were controlled by adjusting the pressure around the Starling resistor. The reservoir was suspended from a force transducer, and changes in lung weight ({Delta}W) were measured as the opposite of reservoir weight change. Our laboratory previously showed that, in this preparation, circulating vascular volume remained constant and vascular anastomotic leaks were trivial, allowing {Delta}W to accurately track minute-to-minute changes in vascular fluid filtration (17). Moreover, the presence of significant edema clearance across the visceral pleura caused {Delta}W to more accurately quantify total filtered fluid compared with gravimetric measurements of extravascular lung water (21). When necessary, the slope of the relationship of {Delta}W and time was calculated at 10-min intervals to determine the rate of reservoir weight change (), which was used as an estimate of lung fluid filtration (21).

The lymph catheter in the superior thoracic duct was allowed to drain into a small beaker suspended from a force transducer ~20 cm below the lungs to permit continuous determination of L. This position ensured that the cannulated duct was always collapsed, thus maintaining a lymphatic outflow pressure of zero (17). Lymph collected in this fashion from our preparation was previously shown to be uncontaminated by lymph from unperfused organs above and below the diaphragm (17). Lymph and plasma colloid osmotic pressures were measured at 30-min intervals with an oncometer (Instrumentation Laboratories, model 186).

Ptr, pulmonary arterial pressure (Ppa), and left atrial pressure (Pla) were referenced to the level of the left atrium. Ppa and Pla were determined at end expiration while the lung was mechanically ventilated. Pressures, flow, weights, and inspired O2 and CO2 concentrations were continuously recorded (Grass model 7D polygraph). Perfusate O2 and CO2 tensions and pH were measured at regular intervals using standard electrode techniques. Perfusate pH was adjusted to 7.35–7.45 at 30-min intervals with 1 N NaHCO3. Perfusate glucose concentrations were monitored with Dextro-stix and kept within 90–130 mg/dl by periodic addition of 50% glucose in water.

Protocols

Protocol 1: changes in VT or f.   Figure 1 provides a diagram of the protocols. In the first part of the study, four groups of four lungs each were perfused for a total of 150 min (after a 30-min stabilization period), which was divided into five 30-min study periods. In two groups, VT was changed from the control setting (12.5 ml/kg) to either 20 or 5 ml/kg for 30 min before returning to control for another 30 min. VT was then changed in the opposite direction for 30 min followed by the final control period. The f was kept constant at 10 min–1 during the entire protocol. The other two groups underwent a similar protocol, except that VT was kept constant at 12.5 ml/kg and f was changed to 30-min periods of either 20 or 5 min–1, always bracketed by control frequency (10 min–1). Changes in were further classified as early or late, depending on when they occurred during the course of the 150-min perfusion.



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Experimental protocols. N, no. of lungs; {Delta}, change.

 
Protocol 2: prolonged change in VT.   As shown in the bottom of Fig. 1, three additional groups of six sheep were perfused for 200 min. After a control period of 100 min (VT = 10 ml/kg, f = 10 min–1), VT was changed to 20 or 3 ml/kg or kept constant during the subsequent 100-min experimental period.

Statistics

All time course data were compared with a two-factor (group, time), split-plot analysis of variance. Because of nonhomogeneity of variance, the L values were transformed to logarithms before statistical analysis to comply with the assumptions of the analysis of variance. When significant variance ratios were obtained, least significant differences were calculated to allow comparison of individual means. The relationship between L and was determined by least squares linear regression. Values presented in the text are means ± SE. Differences were considered significant when P ≤ 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Sheep body weight averaged 25.9 ± 0.6 kg and was not different among groups in either protocol. There were also no differences between or within groups in perfusate Hct, PO2, PCO2, or pH, which averaged 23.4 ± 0.6%, 148.0 ± 0.1 Torr, 28.0 ± 0.6 Torr, and 7.40 ± 0.003, respectively. The lymph-to-plasma colloid osmotic pressure ratio did not differ as a function of time within or between groups, averaging 0.57 ± 0.01.

Protocol 1

Figure 2 shows the effects of the changes in VT (Fig. 2A) and f (Fig. 2B) on peak Ptr. As expected, the changes in VT caused corresponding changes in peak Ptr. For example, increasing the VT from 12.5 to 20 ml/kg caused a 53% increase in peak Ptr, whereas decreasing to 5 ml/kg decreased peak Ptr by 50%. The two time courses of peak Ptr differed from each other during both control periods, in addition to the experimental period where VT was changed (P < 0.001, ANOVA interaction). The differences in control Ptr likely resulted from persistent effects of the immediately preceding experimental intervention (Fig. 1). Increasing f from 10 to 20 min–1 increased peak Ptr by 5%, whereas a decrease in f to 5 min–1 had no effect on peak Ptr. The two protocols resulted in Ptr values that differed from each other only at the onset of the experimental period and during the second control period (P < 0.05, ANOVA interaction).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Time course of peak airway pressures in protocol 1 experiments before, during, and after changes in tidal volume (VT; A) and respiratory frequency (f; B). The shaded 30-min time period shows the effects of the changes in ventilation () from control settings. Values are means ± SE. *P < 0.001 (ANOVA interaction).

 
As shown in Fig. 3, changes in had significant effects on L. The increase in VT from 12.5 to 20 ml/kg caused a rapid 74% increase in L by the first 5-min measurement at 20 ml/kg. When VT was returned to the control level, L decreased by 30%. All L values measured during the increased VT were greater (P < 0.01, ANOVA interaction) than corresponding L measured during the decrease in VT. The increase in f from 10 to 20 min–1 caused a smaller, more gradual increase in L than that caused by increased VT (30 vs. 74%; Fig. 3B). This time course differed significantly (P < 0.05, ANOVA interaction) from the decrease in L caused by decreased in f but only at the 10-min time point.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Time course of lung lymph flow (L) in protocol 1 experiments before, during, and after changes in VT (A) and f (B). The shaded 30-min time period shows the effects of the changes in from control settings. Values are means ± SE. *P < 0.05 (ANOVA interaction).

 
Figure 4 shows the effects of changing on end-expiratory Ppa and the average during each condition. End-expiratory Ppa, which averaged 19.4 ± 1.5 mmHg at the beginning of the first control period, was not affected by changes in VT. The lungs subjected to changing f differed in the time course of Ppa as a function of the protocol order (P < 0.05, ANOVA interaction) because of a small but significant increase in Ppa beginning during the control period preceding the f of 5 min–1. averaged 2.3 ± 0.4 g·h–1·kg–1 over the two control and experimental time periods. The only significant difference in the time course of that occurred as a function of was between the two control periods before the change in VT.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Time course of pulmonary arterial pressure (Ppa; solid symbols) and average rate of change in reservoir weight (; open symbols) before, during, and after changes in VT (A) and f (B). The shaded 30-min time period shows the effects of the changes in from control settings. Values are means ± SE. *P < 0.05 (ANOVA interaction).

 
The independent effects of VT and f on L and per unit change ({Delta}) in are shown in Fig. 5. Increasing VT or f caused similar significant increases in {Delta}L/{Delta} (P < 0.05), but decreasing VT produced a larger decrease in {Delta}L/{Delta} compared with decreasing f over the same range of (ANOVA interaction term; P < 0.005). Increasing VT but not f increased {Delta}/{Delta} compared with baseline, but decreases in VT or f did not affect {Delta}/{Delta}, and the effects of VT and f on {Delta}/{Delta} did not differ from each other as a function of the change in (ANOVA interaction term; P > 0.05), indicating a disconnect between the effects of on L and .



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The independent effects of VT and f changes on the average {Delta}L/{Delta} (A) and {Delta}/{Delta} (B). Values are means ± SE. *P < 0.005 vs. {Delta}f (ANOVA interaction); #P < 0.05 vs. 0.

 
The design of protocol 1 (Fig. 1) allowed a comparison of the effects of the same ventilatory changes as a function of when they occurred during the total perfusion time. For example, increases in VT from 12.5 to 20 ml/kg occurred at both 30 (early) and 90 min (late), measured from the beginning of the first control period. This allowed comparisons at different phases of edema formation, because all lungs steadily gained weight throughout the protocol (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 6, the time course of L resulting from the increase in VT from 12.5 to 20 ml/kg differed significantly, depending on whether it occurred early or late in the experimental protocol (P < 0.002; ANOVA interaction). Specifically, the late increase in VT caused an increase in L that peaked 5 min after the increase in VT followed by a decrease in L, despite the continued increase in VT. In contrast, L continued to gradually increase after the initial VT-induced increase when the same protocol occurred earlier in the protocol. To allow a specific comparison between the early and late immediate changes in L following the increased VT, we performed an ANOVA of the L values expressed as the relative change from the initial control value. This analysis revealed that the immediate changes in L caused by increasing VT were significantly greater when performed later compared with earlier in perfusion (P < 0.02; ANOVA interaction). These differences in {Delta}L were not secondary to differences in {Delta}Ptr, which were similar at the two time points (data not shown).



View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The effect of early vs. late changes in VT on the time course of L. The shaded 30-min time period shows the effect of the increase in VT at the different protocol times. *P < 0.02 (ANOVA interaction).

 
Protocol 2

Figure 7 shows the time course of L over 200 min of perfusion in three groups of lungs with different VT during the second half of the protocol. The data are normalized to the L measured at 100 min because the time course of L over the first 100-min period did not differ between groups, increasing to 0.11 ± 0.02, 0.18 ± 0.06, and 0.15 ± 0.05 ml·h–1·kg–1 by 100 min in the control, low-VT, and high-VT groups, respectively. L continuously increased in control lungs over the entire time course. This increase was linearly related to a continual increase in (L = 0.12 + 0.002; r = 0.98; P < 0.0001), such that the change in accounted for 96% of the variance in L (data not shown). Increasing the VT from 10 to 20 ml/kg at 100 min of perfusion resulted in nearly a threefold increase in L compared with control lungs at the same time point. This increase in L was transient, however; and L in the high-VT group was not different from control levels over the last 60 min of the experimental period. The decrease in VT from 10 to 3 ml/kg in the low-VT group caused a 60% decrease in L that remained significantly different from both control and high-VT values throughout the experimental period (P < 0.005 by ANOVA interaction). The relationship between and L in the high-VT group (r = 0.77) had a significantly lower r value compared with that in the control group (r = 0.98). The r value for this regression was also lower in the low-VT group (r = 0.90), but this was not statistically different from the control group.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Time course of L in control (VT = 10 ml/kg), high (VT = 20 ml/kg), and low (VT = 3 ml/kg) lungs in protocol 2. L is normalized to the value obtained at 100 min just before changing VT. The inset graph shows the average determined between 160 and 200 min normalized to the measured just before the change in VT (60–100 min). *P < 0.005 vs. control (ANOVA interaction). +P < 0.005 vs. high (ANOVA interaction).

 
The changes in VT did not have a significant effect on the average determined over the last 40 min of each experimental period. All three groups demonstrated a significant increase in from just before the VT change to the last 40 min of the experimental period, but the magnitude of this increase did not differ among groups (Fig. 7, inset).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Increasing lung is known to increase L, but the relative contributions of VT and f and the role of -induced changes in fluid filtration have been difficult to separate utilizing intact animal preparations (1, 13, 26). Moreover, there are few data describing these effects in lungs with ongoing endothelial barrier dysfunction. We, therefore, chose to examine the separate effects of VT and f on L in the isolated, perfused sheep lung (17). The advantages of this preparation include the ability to 1) collect pure lung lymph without contamination from systemic lymphatics, 2) control many variables that can affect lung fluid balance, 3) measure minute-to-minute fluid filtration, and 4) separately change VT and f without altering blood-gas tensions or pH (17, 1921). In addition, this preparation develops progressive interstitial edema and increasing L (1820) with preserved lymphatic contractions (17). The pulmonary vascular barrier dysfunction and edema are reproducible, resulting from an oxidant injury triggered by ischemia and reperfusion (4, 20). In the initial description of this preparation, we found that L was directly proportional to f over a range of 0 to 30 min–1, but the separate effects of f and VT on L and fluid balance were not systematically examined (17).

To reproduce the same range in generated by doubling and halving a control f, we varied VT from a low of 3 to a high of 20 ml/kg. Although this VT may fall within a VT range capable of causing ventilator-induced lung injury in rodent models (7), a VT as large as 30 ml/kg was well tolerated in adult sheep (24) and lambs (3) for several hours without evidence of significant lung dysfunction.

Previous studies suggest at least three mechanisms to explain the increased L observed with increases in . First, inspiration is thought to compress a low-compliance perimicrovascular space near alveolar vessels and enlarge the interstitial space surrounding extra-alveolar vessels, airways, and conduit lymphatics (1, 13, 17, 22). These effects may phasically increase the upstream pressure for lymphatic drainage while simultaneously decreasing downstream pressure and lymphatic resistance by dilating conduit lymphatic vessels (6). Because peribronchovascular interstitial pressure increases with increasing accumulation of edema fluid (2, 15), at some point in time increasing lung volume may serve to phasically compress conduit lymphatics simultaneously with the perimicrovascular interstitial space. The presence of lymphatic valves ensures that lymph flow remains unidirectional, regardless of the direction of the pressure gradient between the two interstitial compartments. Second, the phasic circumferential and longitudinal stretch of interstitial lymphatics occurring with each breath could trigger an active lymphatic contraction (11, 12). If this mechanism predominated and the efficiency of each lymphatic contraction was independent of VT, one might expect that the major effect of hyperpnea on lymph flow would be through increases in f rather than VT. Lastly, the increased L associated with increased was hypothesized to result, in large part, from a -induced increase in the rate of fluid filtration across extra-alveolar vessels (1).

Our results confirm previous studies in intact animals (1, 3, 13), which showed that increases in caused increases in L and, in addition, demonstrate that changing VT had a greater effect on L than changing f over the same range of (Figs. 3 and 5) in a preparation without diaphragmatic lymph contamination. Specifically, we found that increasing and decreasing VT from the control level of had similar, significant corresponding effects on {Delta}L/{Delta} (Fig. 5). The increase in f from control had an equivalent effect on {Delta}L/{Delta} to increasing VT, but the decrease in f had a smaller, nonsignificant effect on {Delta}L/{Delta}, suggesting a flatter dose-response curve for f compared with VT at the lower end of .

The time to maximal {Delta}L associated with the changes was rapid, occurring within 5 min of a change in VT and within 10 min of a change in f (Fig. 3). The {Delta}L caused by an increase in VT was significantly greater if VT was altered later in the protocol after the accumulation of interstitial edema (Fig. 6). The -induced changes in L were not correlated with changes in (Figs. 4 and 5), suggesting that changes in altered L through direct mechanical effects on edema-filled compartments and lymphatic vessels rather than through -induced changes in extra-alveolar fluid filtration. Despite the overall disconnect between L and , we did observe that the {Delta}/{Delta} increased in association with the increase in {Delta}L/{Delta} in the condition where VT was increased from control (Fig. 5B), raising the possibility that increased fluid filtration could have contributed, at least in part, to the increase in L in this situation.

To further address the possibility that the changes in L caused by changing VT were occurring because of changes in fluid filtration, we performed the experiments described in protocol 2. In designing this protocol, we considered a model of lung lymphatic drainage (16) similar to those previously proposed by other investigators (6, 8, 12, 25) to explain the effects of on {Delta}L. In this model (Fig. 8), the perimicrovascular fluid space is represented by a compliance (Cpmv), which simultaneously drains 1) through a resistance into a second compliance within the peribronchovascular space (Cpbv) and 2) into the lymphatics, which course through, but have no communication with, the peribronchovascular space (9). Thus L is dependent on the rate of microvascular fluid filtration rather than the absolute amount of interstitial edema surrounding extra-alveolar vessels (6, 8, 12, 16, 25).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Proposed model of the effect of on lymphatic edema clearance from the lung. PALV, alveolar pressure; Ppmv, perimicrovascular pressure; Cpmv, perimicrovascular compliance; Cpbv, peribronchvascular compliance; Ppbv, peribronchovascular pressure.

 
As described above, inspiration would compress the Cpmv and increase the perimicrovascular pressure (Ppmv) through increases in the surrounding alveolar pressure. Before the accumulation of significant interstitial edema, inspiration could simultaneously enlarge the Cpbv and decrease the peribronchovascular pressure (Ppbv), creating a phasic pressure gradient for fluid movement into the lymphatics and the Cpbv (10, 16). After the accumulation of a critical quantity of interstitial edema, inspiration could simultaneously compress both the Cpmv and Cpbv (2). This would tend to decrease the extra-lymphatic gradient for fluid movement from the Cpmv to the Cpbv (2) but could theoretically further enhance the phasic increase in L because of the additional volume of lymph being compressed by each inspiration and the presence of one-way valves in the lymphatic vessels. Changes in f would function in a similar manner through changes in the mean alveolar pressure, Ppmv, and Ppbv at any given VT. In addition, changes in f could trigger changes in the frequency of lymphatic contractions, which, in the presence of valves, could influence L (11, 12). Our observation that {Delta}L was larger when the increase in VT was performed later in the experiment (Fig. 6) is consistent with the notion that an edematous Cpbv may increasingly compress peribronchovascular lymph vessels during inspiration. This would imply that the direct compression of these valved lymphatics, which may have occurred when VT was increased later in the time course, was more effective at driving forward flow than the decrease in lymphatic resistance from the early increase in VT before the development of significant interstitial edema.

Based on this model, we hypothesized that, if the added compressive effect caused by an increased VT did not affect transmicrovascular fluid movement or alter the way in which fluid was distributed between the two parallel drainage pathways (lymphatic vs. peribronchovascular), the outcome would be a transient increase in L that would return to the control level of L associated with the original VT, despite the continued larger VT. Under these circumstances, increasing VT from control to 20 ml/kg would cause a transient increase in Ppmv and decrease in Ppbv. As a result, L would increase until the additional volume in the Cpmv discharged, returning Ppmv and L to control levels. The opposite effect would be anticipated with a decrease in VT. This would be analogous to the similar transient changes in exhaled gas CO2 content that occur with changes in VT, despite a constant rate of CO2 production in the tissues. If the effect of a VT change on L were solely due to enhanced extra-alveolar fluid filtration, the change in L should persist for as long as the change in VT was present. To test this hypothesis, we altered VT in two separate groups of lungs over a longer observation period and compared the effects on L with a third constant group that allowed an estimation of control L over time. As shown in Fig. 7, the increase in VT did, in fact, cause a transient increase in L, returning to control levels by the end of the protocol. Interestingly, after a decrease in VT, the resulting decrease in L did not recover to control levels. Despite the significant effects on L, the changes in VT did not cause concomitant changes in (Fig. 7, inset), adding independent support for a mechanical explanation behind the changes in L.

The prolonged decrease in L from the reduction in VT differs from the study by Sakuma et al. (23), in which completely eliminating left lung by clamping the left bronchus in intact sheep did not affect the increase in caudal mediastinal lymph flow following instillation of serum in the left lower lobe. These data are not easily compared with the present study, however, because right lung f was increased in the bronchial occlusion group to maintain blood gases and the distribution of blood flow was likely altered between lungs because of hypoxic vasoconstriction in the clamped lung. The exact explanation for the lack of L recovery after decreasing VT shown in Fig. 7 is unknown, but this finding suggests that the effective resistance to lymphatic drainage increased with lower VT. For example, if a reduction in VT from 10 to 3 ml/kg resulted in a significant increase in lymphatic resistance to flow because the associated less negative Ppbv failed to adequately stent open the peribronchovascular lymphatics, then one might expect the recovery of the transient decrease in L to be prolonged. The same phenomenon would occur if the mean lymphatic driving pressure fell below a downstream lymphatic critical pressure (27) in some areas of the lung. Although L represents a small fraction of overall edema clearance from the lung (21), this steady-state reduction in L could theoretically result in a greater accumulation of perimicrovascular fluid over time if fluid filtration remains constant. Whether this happens and has a detrimental effect on lung function would depend on the ability of alternative edema clearance pathways to remove this excess interstitial fluid (21). Additional experiments will be required to settle this issue.

In summary, both increases and decreases in caused significant rapid changes in L in the same direction that did not correlate with changes in . Changing VT had a greater effect on L compared with changing f over the same range of . The {Delta}L caused by an increase in VT was significantly greater if VT was altered after the accumulation of interstitial edema. The {Delta}L caused by a sustained increase in VT was transient and did not correlate with , suggesting that altered L through direct mechanical effects on edema-filled compartments and lymphatic vessels rather than through -induced changes in extra-alveolar fluid filtration. A sustained decrease in VT resulted in a sustained decrease in L, suggesting that the decrease in VT in some way increased the downstream lymphatic resistance. The functional significance of the prolonged decrease in L caused by decreasing VT and the potential interactions of simultaneous changes in VT and f will require further study.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-26752.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The authors thank Mary McGeady for technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. B. Pearse, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asthma and Allergy Center, 5501 Hopkins Bayview Circle, Baltimore, MD 21224 (E-mail: dpearse{at}jhmi.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Albelda SM, Hansen-Flaschen JH, Lanken PN, and Fishman AP. Effects of increased ventilation on lung lymph flow in unanesthetized sheep. J Appl Physiol 60: 2063–2070, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bhattacharya J, Gropper MA, and Shepard JM. Lung expansion and the perialveolar interstitial pressure gradient. J Appl Physiol 66: 2600–2605, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Carlton DP, Cummings JJ, Scheerer RG, Poulain FR, and Bland RD. Lung overexpansion increases pulmonary microvascular protein permeability in young lambs. J Appl Physiol 69: 577–583, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Dodd-o JM and Pearse DB. Effect of the NADPH oxidase inhibitor apocynin on ischemia-reperfusion lung injury. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279: H303–H312, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Drake R, Adair T, Traber D, and Gabel J. Contamination of caudal mediastinal node efferent lymph in sheep. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 241: H354–H357, 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Drake RE, Laine GA, Allen SJ, Katz J, and Gabel JC. A model of the lung interstitial-lymphatic system. Microvasc Res 34: 96–107, 1987.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  7. Dreyfuss D and Saumon G. Ventilator-induced lung injury: lessons from experimental studies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 157: 294–323, 1998.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Gee MH and Donovan KA. The flow and composition of pulmonary and systemic lymph in dogs with edema. Lymphology 12: 125–132, 1979.[ISI][Medline]
  9. Gee MH and Havill AM. The relationship between pulmonary perivascular cuff fluid and lung lymph in dogs with edema. Microvasc Res 19: 209–216, 1980.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Goshy M, Lai-Fook SJ, and Hyatt RE. Perivascular pressure measurements by wick-catheter technique in isolated dog lobes. J Appl Physiol 46: 950–955, 1979.[Medline]
  11. Hendin AS and Greenspan RH. Ventilatory pumping of human pulmonary lymphatic vessels. Radiology 108: 553–557, 1973.[ISI][Medline]
  12. Kambara K, Longworth KE, Serikov VB, and Staub NC. Effect of interstitial edema on lung lymph flow in goats in the absence of filtration. J Appl Physiol 72: 1142–1148, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Koizumi T, Roselli RJ, Parker RE, Hermo-Weiler CI, Banerjee M, and Newman JH. Clearance of filtered fluid from the lung during exercise: role of hyperpnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163: 614–618, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Mackersie RC, Christensen J, and Lewis FR. The role of pulmonary lymphatics in the clearance of hydrostatic pulmonary edema. J Surg Res 43: 495–504, 1987.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  15. Miserocchi G, Negrini D, Del Fabbro M, and Venturoli D. Pulmonary interstitial pressure in intact in situ lung: transition to interstitial edema. J Appl Physiol 74: 1171–1177, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Mitzner W and Sylvester JT. Lymph flow and lung weight in isolated sheep lungs. J Appl Physiol 61: 1830–1835, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Patterson GA, Mitzner WA, and Sylvester JT. Assessment of fluid balance in isolated sheep lungs. J Appl Physiol 58: 882–891, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Patterson GA, Rock P, Mitzner WA, Adkinson NF Jr, and Sylvester JT. Effects of imidazole and indomethacin on fluid balance in isolated sheep lungs. J Appl Physiol 58: 892–898, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Pearse DB, Brower RG, Adkinson NF Jr, and Sylvester JT. Spontaneous injury in isolated sheep lungs: role of perfusate leukocytes and platelets. J Appl Physiol 66: 1287–1296, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Pearse DB and Sylvester JT. Vascular injury in isolated sheep lungs. Role of ischemia, extracorporeal perfusion, and oxygen. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 153: 196–202, 1996.[Abstract]
  21. Pearse DB, Wagner EM, and Sylvester JT. Edema clearance in isolated sheep lungs. J Appl Physiol 74: 126–132, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Permutt S. Mechanical influences on water accumulation in the lungs. In: Pulmonary Edema, edited by Fishman AP and Renkin EM. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1979, p. 175–193.
  23. Sakuma T, Pittet JF, Jayr C, and Matthay MA. Alveolar liquid and protein clearance in the absence of blood flow or ventilation in sheep. J Appl Physiol 74: 176–185, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Tsuno K, Prato P, and Kolobow T. Acute lung injury from mechanical ventilation at moderately high airway pressures. J Appl Physiol 69: 956–961, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Unruh HW, Goldberg HS, and Oppenheimer L. Pulmonary interstitial compartments and tissue resistance to fluid flux. J Appl Physiol 57: 1512–1519, 1984.[Medline]
  26. Warren MF and Drinker CK. The flow of lymph from the lungs of the dog. Am J Physiol 136: 207–221, 1942.[Free Full Text]
  27. Woolverton WC, Brigham KL, and Staub NC. Effect of positive pressure breathing on lung lymph flow and water content in sheep. Circ Res 42: 550–557, 1978.[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
J. Yin, J. Hoffmann, S. M. Kaestle, N. Neye, L. Wang, J. Baeurle, W. Liedtke, S. Wu, H. Kuppe, A. R. Pries, et al.
Negative-Feedback Loop Attenuates Hydrostatic Lung Edema via a cGMP-Dependent Regulation of Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4
Circ. Res., April 25, 2008; 102(8): 966 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
E. M. Snyder, K. C. Beck, M. L. Hulsebus, J. F. Breen, E. A. Hoffman, and B. D. Johnson
Short-term hypoxic exposure at rest and during exercise reduces lung water in healthy humans
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2006; 101(6): 1623 - 1632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/556    most recent
00254.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearse, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sylvester, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pearse, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sylvester, J. T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE