HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 99/1/39    most recent 01400.2004v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cao, P. Articles by Hargens, A. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cao, P. Articles by Hargens, A. R.

Exercise within lower body negative pressure partially counteracts lumbar spine deconditioning associated with 28-day bed rest

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California; ²Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata City, Japan; and ³Sleep Consultants, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas

Submitted 21 December 2004 ; accepted in final form 7 March 2005

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION GRANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
Astronauts experience spine deconditioning during exposure to microgravity due to the lack of axial loads on the spine. Treadmill exercise in a lower body negative pressure (LBNP) chamber provides axial loads on the lumbar spine. We hypothesize that daily supine LBNP exercise helps counteract lumbar spine deconditioning during 28 days of microgravity simulated by bed rest. Twelve sets of healthy, identical twins underwent 6° head-down-tilt bed rest for 28 days. One subject from each set of twins was randomly assigned to the exercise (Ex) group, whereas their sibling served as a nonexercise control (Con). The Ex group exercised in supine posture within a LBNP chamber for 45 min/day, 6 days/wk. All subjects underwent magnetic resonance imaging of their lumbar spine before and at the end of bed rest. Lumbar spinal length increased 3.7 ± 0.5 mm in the Con group over 28-day bed rest, whereas, in the Ex group, lumbar spinal length increased significantly less (2.3 ± 0.4 mm, P = 0.01). All lumbar intervertebral disk heights (L₅–S₁, L_4–5, L_3–4, L_2–3, and L_1–2) in the Con group increased significantly over the 28-day bed rest (P < 0.05). In the Ex group, there were no significant increases in L₅–S₁ and L_4–5 disk heights. Lumbar lordosis decreased significantly by 3.3 ± 1.2° during bed rest in the Con group (P = 0.02), but it did not decrease significantly in the Ex group. Our results suggest that supine LBNP treadmill exercise partially counteracts lumbar spine lengthening and deconditioning associated with simulated microgravity.

simulated microgravity; lumbar spine length; intervertebral disk height; spinal curvature; countermeasures

Because the lumbar spine normally bears 50% body weight (BW) during upright posture on Earth (14, 22, 23), this portion of the spine may be uniquely adapted to gravity. On Earth after overnight bed rest, lumbar length increases 2.7 mm (15). During spaceflight, 4- to 6-cm increase of body height occurs in astronauts (4, 28, 32). Additionally, intervertebral disk volume and cross-sectional area (CSA) increase during simulated and actual microgravity (11, 15). Animal experiments document disk biochemistry and degeneration during microgravity (12, 25). Thornton and collaborators (29) found a decrease in spinal curvature with exposing to microgravity. Moreover, LeBlanc and coworkers (17) report that even short-duration spaceflight produces significant back muscular atrophy.

Due to the high cost of research during actual microgravity, bed rest is often used as an analog of microgravity to study the anatomical and physiological changes of the spine, as well as other gravity-related functions (11, 20, 24). Hutchinson and coworkers (10) document that 6° head-down tilt (HDT) bed rest increases body height. Our study used 28-day HDT bed rest to investigate lumbar spine changes during simulated microgravity.

As the duration of manned spaceflights becomes longer, it is necessary for astronauts to have an effective method to counteract spinal deconditioning. Several exercise protocols and devices are used during spaceflight, such as Mini Gym, Penguin suit, and the bungee cord harness system. However, these devices are uncomfortable or lack sufficient loads to maintain preflight musculoskeletal mass. The optimal protocol and equipment for exercise in space are still unresolved (5). Over the past 10 yr, we have developed a lower body negative pressure (LBNP) treadmill exercise system that provides both cardiovascular and musculoskeletal responses equivalent to upright exercise in gravity (3, 9, 21, 31). This exercise system also ameliorates some of the negative effects of weightlessness on exercise capacity and bone metabolism (26, 31). The present study evaluates the possible benefits of supine LBNP treadmill exercise on spinal deconditioning by comparing the pre- and post-bed-rest spinal length, intervertebral disk height, lordosis, and CSA of back muscles at the level of the lumbar spine. We hypothesize that daily supine LBNP treadmill exercise helps maintain normal diurnal lumbar length change and prevent lumbar spine deconditioning during 28 days of HDT bed rest.

	METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION GRANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
The University of California San Diego and National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center and Johnson Space Center Institutional Review Boards approved this study, and all subjects gave informed, written consent before participation. Twelve sets of healthy, identical twins (14 women and 10 men) participated in this study. They exhibited the following characteristics (means ± SD): age = 26 ± 4 yr, range 22–37 yr; weight = 61.7 ± 12.4 kg, range 43.7–84.1 kg; and height = 168.7 ± 10.7 cm, range 152.4–190.5 cm. All subjects had no previous history of back pain, back surgery, or contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

One subject from each set of twins was randomly assigned to an exercise (Ex) group, while their sibling served as a nonexercise, control (Con) group. All subjects remained at strict 6° HDT bed rest for 28 days, except during LBNP exercise and shower, when they were in the horizontal supine position. The subjects of the Ex group exercised in a LBNP chamber, whereas those of the Con group did not exercise. The same exercise device and protocol used in the present study were described in detail in a previous report (31). In brief, the subject was placed supine into a LBNP chamber and sealed with a flexible, neoprene waist seal (Fig. 1). LBNP (50–55 mmHg) produced footward or ground reaction force (GRF) equivalent to one BW on the subject. The shoulder straps connected to the elastic waist seal generated additional axial loads on the spine during treadmill exercise (Fig. 1). Subjects performed an interval exercise protocol for 40 min (40–80% peak oxygen consumption), followed by a 5-min period of nonexercise LBNP, 6 days/wk.

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. View from above the lower body negative pressure (LBNP) exercise chamber. The subject was placed supine into the LBNP chamber, which contains a vertically oriented treadmill. The subject was exposed to one body weight (BW) footward force or ground reaction force (GRF) that was composed of three components: 1) the suction force (Fseal) produced by the elastic waist seal around the hip; 2) the axial force (F1) over the whole body produced by negative pressure on subject; and 3) the loading force (F2) generated by the shoulder straps, which connect to the seal. Aw, cross-sectional area of the subject’s body at waist level; As, cross-sectional area of the waist seal only. GRF = Fseal + F1 + F2, where F1 = LBNP·Aw.

MR images were analyzed by using a personal computer with software Image J 1.30V (Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health). Midsagittal MRI views were used to measure the entire lumbar spinal length, individual lumbar intervertebral disk heights, lumbar lordosis, and individual lumbar intervertebral angles. A transverse MRI view at L_3–4 intervertebral disk level was used to measure the CSAs of the psoas and erector muscles. The midsagittal plane was determined by using the spinous processes as a confirmatory landmark. Lumbar spinal length was defined as the distance between the horizontal line drawn at the anterosuperior corner of the L₁ vertebral body and the horizontal line drawn at the anterosuperior corner of the S₁ vertebral body. Disk height was obtained from the average of anterior and posterior disk heights, according to the method of Dabbs and Dabbs (6) (Fig. 2A). Lumbar lordosis was defined as the angle between the upper surfaces of L₁ and S₁ vertebral body, according to Andersson and coworkers’ method (2) (Fig. 2B). The intervertebral angle was measured as the angle between the upper surfaces of relative vertebral body and the next vertebral body. For example, the intervertebral L₄ angle was measured as the angle between the upper surface of L₄ vertebral body and the upper surface of L₅ vertebral body. Positive values indicated lordosis, whereas negative values indicated kyphosis. The CSAs of the psoas and erector muscles were measured as the total muscle area on both sides of the spine at the L_3–4 intervertebral disk level. Due to imperfect MR images at L_3–4 disk level of one set of male and one set of female twins, their muscle CSAs were not used in data analysis.

View larger version (60K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. A: parameters measured in sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of lumbar spine. Lumbar spinal length (l) refers to the distance between the horizontal line drawn at the anterosuperior corner of the L1 vertebral body and the horizontal line drawn at the anterosuperior corner of the S1 vertebral body. a, anterior intervertebral disk height; b, posterior disk height. Mean overall disk height = (a + b)/2. B: the line L1 to line S1 refers to the upper surfaces of L1 to S1 vertebral body. Lumbar lordosis () was measured as the angle between line L1 and line S1. The intervertebral angle was measured as the angle between two lines of relative vertebral bodies. The intervertebral L4 angle (4) was measured as the angle between the line L4 and line L5.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION GRANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
Lumbar spine lengthened in both Ex and Con groups over 28-day bed rest. However, the increase of lumbar length in the Ex group was significantly less than that in the Con group (P = 0.01, Fig. 3). Lumbar spine lengths were 183.0 ± 3.7 (SE) mm in the Con group Pre-BR and 186.7 ± 3.8 mm Post-BR, an increase of 3.7 ± 0.5 mm (2.0 ± 0.3% of the total lumbar length) (P < 0.001). In the Ex group, lumbar spinal lengths were 183.3 ± 4.0 and 185.6 ± 3.9 mm Pre-BR and Post-BR, respectively, an increase of 2.3 ± 0.4 mm (1.3 ± 0.2% of the total lumbar length) (P < 0.001).

View larger version (9K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Lumbar spine lengthening is less in the exercise (Ex) group compared with the control (Con) groups during 28-day head-down tilt (HDT) bed rest. Values are means ± SE. *P < 0.05.

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Lumbar spine intervertebral disk heights before (Pre-BR) and at the end of 28-day bed rest (Post-BR). Values are means ± SE. *P < 0.05; ns indicates P > 0.05.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Lumbar lordosis decreases less in the Ex group compared with the Con group during 28-day HDT bed rest. Values are means ± SE. *P < 0.05; ns indicates P > 0.05.

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. The lumbar intervertebral angles Pre-BR and Post-BR. Values are means ± SE. *P < 0.05.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION GRANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
Referring back to our initial hypothesis, we find that daily supine LBNP treadmill exercise maintains normal diurnal lumbar spine length change and partially diminishes the lumbar spine deconditioning associated with 28-day bed rest. LBNP exercise helps to 1) reduce lumbar lengthening, 2) counteract intervertebral lumbar disk thickening, and 3) prevent the loss of lumbar lordosis associated with 28-day microgravity simulated by HDT bed rest.

The LBNP exercise protocol provides 60–65% BW axial loads on lumbar spine during supine exercise. With a pressure differential of 50–55 mmHg between the inside and outside LBNP chamber, the subject is exposed to one BW footward force or GRF. We believe the GRF over the body is composed of three components (Fig. 1). The first component is the suction force produced by the elastic waist seal around the hip due to negative pressure on the seal. The second component is the axial force over the whole body produced by negative pressure on the subject, which is equivalent to the CSA of the body’s waist multiplied by the negative pressure. The third is the force generated by the shoulder straps that connect to the seal. The latter two components provide axial loads on lumbar spine. In our study, the negative pressure in the chamber was 50–55 mmHg. The waist areas of subjects were 400–500 cm². While exercising, the shoulder straps provide 10–15% BW force on the shoulder. Therefore, we calculate the overall axial loads on lumbar spine to be 60–65% BW.

On Earth, the lumbar spine is exposed to 50% BW axial loads during upright posture (14, 22, 23) for 12–16 h/day. LeBlanc and coworkers (15) find that the lumbar spine lengthens 2.7 mm after overnight bed rest. Kimura and collaborators (14) report that lumbar spinal length is reduced by 2.5 mm (1.3% of total lumbar spinal length) with 50% BW loads compared with a no-load condition. Our LBNP exercise system provides 60–65% BW axial loads over the lumbar spine. It is noteworthy that the loading time of our exercise protocol (45 min/day) is much less than the normal diurnal loading time associated with upright seated and standing postures (16 h/day), and the lumbar axial loads of our exercise system are more than the normal upright loads of 50% BW on Earth. Our study finds that, in the Ex group, the lumbar spinal lengthening is 2.3 mm (1.3% of the total lumbar length), which is similar with the normal diurnal lumbar lengthening.

Lengthening of the whole spine may induce back pain during the first few days of spaceflight (27, 32). This conclusion is based on the assumption that the spine lengthening stretches the spinal cord, disk anulus, intervertebral muscles, spinal ligaments, and facet joint capsules. Our data indicate that daily supine LBNP exercise helps prevent abnormal lumbar lengthening during bed rest. These results suggest that the LBNP exercise may decrease the back pain in actual microgravity, although we have no such pain data from our HDT bed-rest simulation.

During the chronic unloading of long-term spaceflight, intervertebral disk expansion is potentially a significant problem for astronauts (8, 11, 15). The intervertebral disk is the largest avascular structure in the human body, and the disk’s cellular metabolism depends on the fluid flux into and out of the disk (30). On Earth, the diurnal change of posture and spine movement (flexion/extension) alters compressive loads on disks, moving fluid into and out of the disk. During upright posture or spinal flexion, the intervertebral disk is compressed (8). Fluid is driven out of the nucleus pulposus, and metabolic waste products are expelled. In the supine position or spinal extension, the intervertebral disk is unloaded, causing fluid influx into the nucleus pulposus and facilitating transport of nutrients into the disk. During long-term bed rest or spaceflight, owing to lack of loading force along the vertical body axis, the intervertebral disk probably expands until a new equilibrium is attained whereby swelling pressure within the disk matches external loads (8). The diurnal cycle to expel wastes and imbibe nutrients may thus be seriously deficient (1, 8). This might inhibit the metabolism of nucleus pulposus cells and, consequently, produce early degenerative changes in intervertebral disks. Some animal data showed that proteoglycans decreased, and the collagen-to-proteoglycan ratio of intervertebral disks increased in space-flown animals (12, 25). No such biochemical and cytological studies are available for human intervertebral disks during microgravity or long-term bed rest, although some studies show that disk height, CSA, and volume all increase (11, 15). Supine LBNP treadmill exercise provides axial loads on lumbar intervertebral disk to simulate upright loading cycles. Gait biomechanics impose some dynamic cyclical loads on the spine to simulate loads of daily activity on intervertebral disks during upright exercise on Earth. Such loads help maintain normal disk metabolism, structure, and function. Our data indicate that the exercise system prevents L₅–S₁ and L_4–5 disk heightening and diminishes heightening of the other disks. From a scientific viewpoint, it may be worthwhile to include another experimental group with LBNP alone (no treadmill exercise). However, such a group does not provide the same loads on the lumbar spine compared with our dynamic LBNP treadmill exercise group (Fig. 1). Moreover, it is difficult to add another group of 12 subjects of the same genotype for comparison to our LBNP Ex and Con groups. We had great difficulty recruiting identical twins. Recruiting identical triplets would be even more difficult to undertake for a study of three groups with the same genotype.

Spinal curvature is diminished with the loss of axial spinal loads. For example, Thornton et al. (29) report that the decrease of spinal curvature in space is due to the lack of axial loads. During ground-based MRI studies of gravity effects on the spine, Lee and coworkers (18) found that spinal curvature decreased with reduced axial loading. The spinal curvature and intervertebral disk health are interrelated. Farfan and colleagues (7) note an association between decreased lumbar curve and increased disk degeneration. In a study of osteoporotic patients by Itoi (13), decreased curvature was associated with increased low back pain. Our results indicate that lumbar lordosis is reduced after 28-day HDT bed rest in the Con group. In LBNP Ex group, no significant lordosis change occurs over 28-day HDT bed rest. This finding suggests that LBNP exercise may help ameliorate the negative effects of spaceflight on spinal curvature. Lumbar lordosis is the sum of the lumbar intervertebral angles from L₁ to L₅. Our study shows that the individual lumbar intervertebral angles tend to decrease after 28-day bed rest, although not significantly (except for L_3–4) in Con and Ex groups. We think this is because such changes are simply too small relative to the sensitivity of our MR images.

Most astronauts experience muscle atrophy in microgravity (17). It is shown that 4–5 wk of bed rest produce 10% loss in muscle mass in the lower limbs (16). LeBlanc and coworkers (17) find that back muscle volume decreases by 10% after 8-day shuttle flight. Our study shows that, at L_3–4 disk level over 28-day HDT bed rest, erector muscle CSA decreases by 7.7 and 6.8% in the Con and Ex group, respectively. We find no significant difference in the erector muscle atrophy between Con and Ex groups, suggesting that supine LBNP treadmill exercise had no significant effect on spinal back muscle atrophy during 28-day bed rest.

The limitations of the present study should be noted. For example, HDT bed rest does not completely unload the lumbar spine compared with actual microgravity. Because of the nature of bed rest in 6° HDT, the gravity vector is still present. Thus the weight of the lower body provides an axial load on the lumbar spine during HDT bed rest. This may explain why, in the Con group, the spinal lengthening during bed rest is less than the lengthening during spaceflight (4, 27, 28). Another limitation of this study is that LBNP exercise cannot simulate daytime spinal movements such as spinal flexion and extension, which are important to maintain intervertebral disk metabolism. In our Earth-based LBNP exercise protocol, a back support is needed to bear the BW that limits spinal movement during exercise. Therefore, LBNP exercise in microgravity may yield more movement on the spine because the back support is unnecessary in microgravity. Additionally, the heightening of individual intervertebral disks is small, and, therefore, it is more appropriate to focus on the total lumbar spinal length increase.

In summary, supine LBNP treadmill exercise provides axial loads on the lumbar spine and helps counteract some of the lumbar deconditioning of HDT bed rest observed in Con subjects. Therefore, this countermeasure has the potential to assist astronauts in maintaining normal spine structure and function during spaceflight.

	GRANTS

TOP ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION GRANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
This study was supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration Grant NAG9–1425 and National Institutes of Health Grant M01RR-00827 to the UCSD GCRC.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

TOP ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION GRANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
The authors gratefully acknowledge the enthusiastic participation of our outstanding twins and the staff working at University of California-San Diego General Clinic Research Center (UCSD GCRC).

	FOOTNOTES

 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. R. Hargens, Dept. of Orthopaedics Surgery, Univ. of California-San Diego, 350 Dickinson St., San Diego, CA 92103–8894 (E-mail: ahargens{at}ucsd.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION GRANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 

1. Adams MA and Hutton WC. The effect of posture on the fluid content of lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 8: 665–671, 1983.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
2. Andersson GB, Murphy RW, Ortengre R, and Nachemson AL. The influence of backrest inclination and lumbar support on lumbar lordosis. Spine 4: 52–58, 1979.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Boda WL, Watenpaugh DE, Ballard RE, and Hargens AR. Supine lower body negative pressure exercise simulates metabolic and kinetic features of upright exercise. J Appl Physiol 89: 649–654, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Brown JW. Crew height measurements. In: The Apollo-Soyuz Test Project: Medical Report. Washington, DC: NASA, 1977, p. 119–121. (Spec. NASA Rep. SP-411)
5. Convertino VA. Planning strategies for development of effective exercise and nutrition countermeasures for long-duration space flight. Nutrition 18: 880–888, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
6. Dabbs VM and Dabbs LG. Correlation between disc height narrowing and low-back pain. Spine 15: 1366–1369, 1990.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
7. Farfan HF, Huberdeau RM, and Dubow HI. Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54: 492–510, 1972.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Hargens AR, Hutchinson KJ, Ballard RE, and Murthy G. Intervertebral disc: loaded on Earth and unloaded in space. In: Connective Tissue Biology: Integration and Reductionism, edited by Reed R and Rubin K. London: Portland Press, 1998, p. 125–133.
9. Hargens AR, Whalen RT, Watenpaugh DE, Schwandt DF, and Krock LP. Lower body negative pressure to provide load bearing in space. Aviat Space Environ Med 62: 934–937, 1991.[Medline]
10. Hutchinson KJ, Watenpaugh DE, Murthy G, Convertino VA, and Hargens AR. Back pain during 6 degrees head-down tilt approximates that during actual microgravity. Aviat Space Environ Med 66: 256–259, 1995.[Medline]
11. Hutton WC, Malko JA, and Fajman WA. Lumbar disc volume measured by MRI: effects of bed rest, horizontal exercise, and vertical loading. Aviat Space Environ Med 74: 73–78, 2003.[Medline]
12. Hutton WC, Yoon ST, Elmer WA, Li J, Murakami H, Minamide A, and Akamaru T. Effect of tail suspension (or simulated weightlessness) on the lumbar intervertebral disc: study of proteoglycans and collagen. Spine 27: 1286–1290, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
13. Itoi E. Roentgenographic analysis of posture in spinal osteoporotics. Spine 16: 750–756, 1991.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
14. Kimura S, Steinbach GC, Watenpauch DE, and Hargens AR. Lumbar spine disc height and curvature responses to an axial load generated by a compression device compatible with magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 26: 2596–2600, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
15. LeBlanc A, Evans HJ, Schneider VS, Wendt RE 3rd, and Hedrick TD. Changes in intervertebral disc cross-sectional area with bed rest and space flight. Spine 19: 812–817, 1994.[ISI][Medline]
16. LeBlanc A, Gogia P, Schneider V, Krebs J, Schonfeld E, and Evans H. Calf muscle area and strength changes after five weeks of horizontal bed rest. Am J Sports Med 16: 624–629, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. LeBlanc A, Rowe R, Schneider V, Evans H, and Hedrick T. Regional muscle loss after short duration spaceflight. Aviat Space Environ Med 66: 1151–1154, 1995.[Medline]
18. Lee SU, Hargens AR, Fredericson M, and Lang PK. Lumbar spine disc heights and curvature: upright posture vs. supine compression harness. Aviat Space Environ Med 74: 512–516, 2003.[Medline]
19. Malko JA, Hutton WC, and Fajman WA. An in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in the volume (and fluid content) of the lumbar intervertebral discs during a simulated diurnal load cycle. Spine 24: 1015–1022, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
20. McGill SM and Axler CT. Changes in spine height throughout 32 hours of bedrest. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77: 1071–1073, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
21. Murthy G, Watenpaugh DE, Ballard RE, and Hargens AR. Exercise against lower body negative pressure as a countermeasure for cardiovascular and musculoskeletal deconditioning. Acta Astronaut 33: 89–96, 1994.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
22. Nachemson AL. Disc pressure measurements. Spine 6: 93–97, 1981.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
23. Noshir A, Langrana W, Edwards T, and Sharma M. Biomechanical analysis of loads on the lumbar spine. In: The Lumbar Spine/The International Society for the Study of Lumbar Spine (2nd ed.), edited by Wiesel SW, Weinstein JN, Herkowitz H, Dvoák J, and Bell G. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1996, vol. I, chapt. 4, p. 163–181.
24. Pavy Le-Traon A, Rous De Feneyrols A, Cornac A, Abdeseelam R, N’uygen D, Lazerges M, Guell A, and Bes A. Psychomotor performance during a 28 day head-down tilt with and without lower body negative pressure. Acta Astronaut 32: 319–330, 1994.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
25. Sinha RK, Shah SA, Hume EL, and Tuan RS. The effect of a 5-day space flight on the immature rat spine. Spine 2: 239–243, 2002.[CrossRef]
26. Smith SM, Davis-Street JE, Fesperman JV, Calkins DS, Bawa M, Macias BR, Meyer RS, and Hargens AR. Evaluation of treadmill exercise in a lower body negative pressure chamber as a countermeasure for weightlessness-induced bone loss: a bed rest study with identical twins. J Bone Miner Res 18: 2223–2230, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
27. Styf JR, Ballard RE, Fechner K, Watenpaugh DE, Kahan NJ, and Hargens AR. Height increase, neuromuscular function, and back pain during 6 degree head-down tilt with traction. Aviat Space Environ Med 68: 24–29, 1997.[Medline]
28. Thornton WE and Moore TP. Height changes in microgravity. In: Results of the Life Sciences DSOs Conducted Aboard the Space Shuttle 1981–1986, edited by Bungo MW, Bagian TM, Bowman MA, and Levitan BM. Houston, TX: NASA-Johnson Space Center, 1987, p. 55–57.
29. Thornton WE, Hoffler GW, and Rummel JA. Anthropometric changes and fluid shifts. In: Biomedical Results from Skylab. Houston, TX: NASA, 1977.
30. Urban JP and Maroudas A. Swelling of the intervertebral disc in vitro. Connect Tissue Res 9: 1–10, 1981.[ISI][Medline]
31. Watenpaugh DE, Ballard RE, Schneider SM, Lee SM, Ertl AC, William JM, Boda WL, Hutchinson KJ, and Hargens AR. Supine lower body negative pressure exercise during bed rest maintains upright exercise capacity. J Appl Physiol 89: 218–227, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Wing PC, Tsang IK, Susak L, Gagnon F, Gagnon R, and Potts JE. Back pain and spinal changes in microgravity. Orthop Clin North Am 22: 255–262, 1991.[ISI][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Trappe, A. Creer, K. Minchev, D. Slivka, E. Louis, N. Luden, and T. Trappe Human soleus single muscle fiber function with exercise or nutrition countermeasures during 60 days of bed rest Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): R939 - R947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. E. Watenpaugh, D. D. O'Leary, S. M. Schneider, S. M. C. Lee, B. R. Macias, K. Tanaka, R. L. Hughson, and A. R. Hargens Lower body negative pressure exercise plus brief postexercise lower body negative pressure improve post-bed rest orthostatic tolerance J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2007; 103(6): 1964 - 1972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Edgell, K. A. Zuj, D. K. Greaves, J. K. Shoemaker, M.-A. Custaud, P. Kerbeci, P. Arbeille, and R. L. Hughson WISE-2005: adrenergic responses of women following 56-days, 6{degrees} head-down bed rest with or without exercise countermeasures Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): R2343 - R2352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Demiot, F. Dignat-George, J.-O. Fortrat, F. Sabatier, C. Gharib, I. Larina, G. Gauquelin-Koch, R. Hughson, and M.-A. Custaud WISE 2005: chronic bed rest impairs microcirculatory endothelium in women Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H3159 - H3164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Trappe, A. Creer, D. Slivka, K. Minchev, and T. Trappe Single muscle fiber function with concurrent exercise or nutrition countermeasures during 60 days of bed rest in women J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2007; 103(4): 1242 - 1250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Dorfman, B. D. Levine, T. Tillery, R. M. Peshock, J. L. Hastings, S. M. Schneider, B. R. Macias, G. Biolo, and A. R. Hargens Cardiac atrophy in women following bed rest J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2007; 103(1): 8 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. R. Macias, P. Cao, D. E. Watenpaugh, and A. R. Hargens LBNP treadmill exercise maintains spine function and muscle strength in identical twins during 28-day simulated microgravity J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2007; 102(6): 2274 - 2278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 99/1/39    most recent 01400.2004v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cao, P. Articles by Hargens, A. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cao, P. Articles by Hargens, A. R.