Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 99: 103-107, 2005. First published March 17, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01153.2004
8750-7587/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/1/103    most recent
01153.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chung, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chung, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, D.

Korean and Caucasian overweight premenopausal women have different relationship of body mass index to percent body fat with age

Sochung Chung,1,2 Mi-Yeon Song,3 Hyun-Dae Shin,3 Deog-Yoon Kim,4 Qing He,1,5 Stan Heshka,1 Jack Wang,1 John Thornton,1 Blandine Laferrère,1 F. Xavier Pi-Sunyer,1 and Dympna Gallagher1,5

1Department of Medicine, Obesity Research Center, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital and College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York; 2Department of Pediatrics, Konkuk University Hospital Center and College of Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul; 3Department of Oriental Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyunghee University, Seoul; 4Department of Nuclear Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyunghee University, Seoul, Korea; and 5Institute of Human Nutrition, Columbia University, New York, New York

Submitted 13 October 2004 ; accepted in final form 14 March 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The aim of the study was to investigate in premenopausal women whether the relationship between percentage body fat (PBF) and body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) differs between Korean Asians (Ko-As) living in Seoul, South Korea, and Caucasians (Ca) living in New York City. Healthy premenopausal women (50 Ko-As; 38 Ca), ages 22–50 yr, were studied. Weight, height, and PBF by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were measured. Total body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data were collected using GE-Lunar systems (Prodigy-Korea and DPXL-New York), and all scan analyses were performed by one technician in New York. Similar soft tissue phantoms were used for daily instrument calibrations at both sites. The relationship between PBF and BMI was assessed by multiple regression analysis with race, age, reciprocal of BMI (1/BMI), and a race-by-age interaction as the final independent variables. Race (P = 0.003) and 1/BMI (P < 0.001) were significantly related to PBF in this model. A significant race-by-age interaction (P = 0.039) indicated that the slope of the lines for PBF vs. age differed between Ko-As and Ca. This study demonstrates in a Ko-As sample that the BMI-fat relationship differs significantly from that in a comparable group of Caucasian women. Investigators who use BMI as an index of fatness should be aware of the well documented differences in the relationship of BMI and fatness across race/ethnic groups.

dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry


BODY MASS INDEX (BMI) is the most commonly used surrogate measure of fatness, and single definitions are advocated by the World Health Organization (WHO) for both overweight (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2), irrespective of race/ethnicity (22, 24). However, some individuals whose BMI places them in the overweight category may have a normal percent body fat (PBF), whereas some individuals whose BMI is within the normal range may have a high PBF.

Over the past 5 years, an ever growing number of peer reviewed publications have proposed the need to redefine the BMI overweight and obesity cutoff points for Asian populations (22, 23). The rationale is primarily based on the findings that Asian populations have different associations between BMI, PBF, and health risks than do European populations. For a similar BMI, components of the metabolic syndrome/cardiovascular risk factors appear higher in Asians (22) and a higher prevalence of diabetes and hypertension appear with very modest increases in BMI (2, 22, 23). Because BMI is merely a proxy for fatness, it is important to determine the relationship between BMI and fatness and ascertain whether race/ethnic differences exist in this relationship (35, 22).

Our laboratory previously reported that Japanese-Asian adult women and men (living in Japan) had a significantly higher PBF for any given BMI compared with African-Americans (living in New York) and Caucasians (living in New York and Cambridge, UK) (7). We also found that Asian-American women have a higher amount of visceral adipose issue (adjusted for total adiposity) than European-American women, indicating that adipose tissue distribution is also different between these two race groups (12).

Of interest to us in the present study was whether race differences exist in the relationship between PBF and BMI in Korean-Asians compared with Caucasian premenopausal women, where PBF was determined by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and the Asian cohort was tested in Seoul, South Korea. The usefulness of a single BMI cutoff value as a universal screening tool for obesity risk is dependent on the degree to which BMI reliably reflects comparable levels of fatness across race groups. Were BMI to represent different levels of fatness across race groups, then this calls into question the continued use of BMI in this context. Identification and characterization of differences could form the basis for further investigation of the associated metabolic implications.

The primary aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that premenopausal, overweight Korean-Asian women have a greater PBF compared with Caucasian women. We carried out this aim by examining in a cross-sectional sedentary cohort the independent effect of race group on PBF, after controlling for BMI.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Protocol

All medical and body composition evaluations were carried out on the same day for each participant, who was clothed in a hospital gown and without shoes. The studies were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital in New York and Kyunghee Oriental Medical Center in Seoul, Korea, and each subject gave written consent before participation.

Subjects

Korean-Asian.   Fifty subjects were required to be independent, community-dwelling overweight (BMI > 28 kg/m2) premenopausal Korean women, ages 22–47 yr, not taking oral contraceptives, and not currently pregnant or breast feeding. The data included in these analyses were collected as the baseline data in an intervention study looking at the effects of a traditional Korean diet on weight loss (15). Inclusion criteria required that subjects be ambulatory, nonexercising, nonsmoking, and have maintained current body weight ±3 kg over the previous 3 mo. Subjects with untreated diabetes mellitus, malignant/catabolic conditions, missing limb, joint replacement, on estrogen replacement therapy, or taking medications (including oral contraceptives, calcitonin, steroids, or diuretics) that could potentially influence body composition were excluded from the study. Recruitment occurred through advertisements in newspapers and website.

New York-Caucasian.   Subjects from archived datasets were identified based on race and age. Thirty-eight Caucasians were participants in a weight-loss study (19), and only the baseline data were used in the present analyses. Race was determined by self-report, where subjects had to report both parents and four grandparents as Caucasian. Subjects were recruited from 1997 to 2002 through advertisements in local newspapers, radio stations, and flyers posted in the local community. Inclusion criteria were as follows: premenopausal as determined by self report of regular menstrual cycles; ages 26–50 yr; BMI > 28 kg/m2 but not weighing >250 lbs. (due to size limitations with the DXA scan system); not on medication affecting bone homeostasis (including oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy, calcitonin, fluoride, steroids, or diuretics); ambulatory, nonexercising, and nonsmoking. All subjects were healthy according to medical history, physical examination, and routine blood chemistry analyses.

Body Composition

Korean-Asian.   While subjects wore a hospital gown, body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg (Jenix; Dongsan, Korea) and height was measured to the nearest 0.5 cm using a stadiometer (CAS). Total body fat, fat-free body mass, and bone mineral content were measured with a whole body DXA (Prodigy, GE Lunar, Madison, WI) using software version 6.5. The raw DXA scan data were stored on CD-ROM and sent to the DXA laboratory of St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital in New York for analysis.

New York-Caucasian.   While subjects wore a hospital gown and were barefoot, body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg (Weight Tronix, New York, NY) and height to the nearest 0.5 cm using a stadiometer (Holtain; Crosswell). Total body fat, fat-free body mass, and bone mineral content were measured with a whole body DXA (DPXL, GE Lunar) using software version 3.4.

Analyses of all Korean and New York DXA scans were performed by the same DXA technician in New York.

DXA Quality Control

A standard soft-tissue calibration method for DXA developed in New York and used daily since 1987 was employed in both the Korean and New York laboratories. Bottles with an 8-liter volume capacity (Fischer Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) containing methanol and water, simulating fat and fat-free soft tissues, respectively, were scanned on the day of study as soft-tissue quality control markers. The coefficient of variation over the study period was 4.39 and 12.98% for methanol and water, respectively, for Korea and 1.18 and 6.23% for methanol and water, respectively, for New York. The purpose of this calibration procedure is twofold: 1) to monitor the stability of a DXA machine over time and 2) to allow for the pooling of DXA soft-tissue data (i.e., PBF) collected on different machines. The latter is essential when data collected at different locations on similar machines from the same manufacturer are compared, because machines do not read the same exact soft-tissue values.

PBF Conversion Equation

To answer the question of whether, for a similar BMI, Korean-Asians have a greater PBF compared with Caucasians, the percent fat readings (derived from the ratio of the attenuation at 2 energy peaks) from the methanol and water bottles were used to generate a regression equation where PBF for the Korean (Asian) sample was converted to New York (Caucasians) values. The conversion equation was:

(1)

Statistical Analysis

All analyses were carried out with the statistical software program SPSS, version 11.5 (SPSS, Chicago, IL), and P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Student's t-test was used to test for race differences in the study sample. The relationship between PBF and BMI was assessed by multiple regression analysis with race, age, reciprocal of BMI (1/BMI), and a race-by-age interaction as the final independent variables. Potential interaction terms were explored in model development. The reciprocal of BMI (1/BMI) was used instead of BMI to improve the linearity in the regression model as justified previously (6, 7).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Subject Characteristics

The descriptive characteristics for Korean-Asian and New York-Caucasian premenopausal overweight women in this sample are summarized in Table 1. Korean-Asians were younger (P < 0.001) and weighed less (P < 0.001) compared with New York-Caucasians. The difference in height was marginal (P = 0.061). BMI and hip circumference (both P < 0.001) were smaller, and waist circumference (P = 0.046) and waist-to-hip ratio (P < 0.001) were larger in the Korean-Asian group. In terms of body composition, Korean-Asians had a higher PBF (P = 0.005) with less total lean tissue (P < 0.001), less total fat (P = 0.004), and greater total bone mineral content (P = 0.021) compared with the New York-Caucasians. There was no significant between-group difference in total bone mineral density (P = 0.264).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Subject characteristics

 
Regression Models for PBF

The results from the regression model described in Eq. 2 are shown in Table 2 where PBF= b0 + b1(race) + b2(age) + b3(1/BMI )+ b4(age x race) + {epsilon} (Eq. 2) with b0–b4 representing the intercept and regression coefficients of the terms in the model.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Percent body fat multiple regression analysis model

 
Race (P = 0.003) and 1/BMI (P < 0.001) were significantly related to PBF in this model. After adjusting for age and age x race, there was a significant difference in PBF (P = 0.015) such that Korean-Asians had a greater PBF compared with New York-Caucasians (Fig. 1). A significant race-by-age interaction (P = 0.039) was found, indicating that the slope of the lines for PBF vs. age differed between Korean-Asians and New York-Caucasians (Fig. 2).



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Percent body fat (PBF) vs. reciprocal body mass index (1/BMI) in Korean-Asian ({bullet}) and New York-Caucasian ({circ}) premenopausal women. PBF was calculated from Eq. 2 with adjustment for age. The trend lines shown were fitted using locally weighted smoothing function. Solid and dashed lines represent Korean-Asian and New York-Caucasian, respectively.

 


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. PBF vs. age in Korean-Asian ({bullet}) and New York-Caucasian ({circ}) premenopausal women. PBF was calculated from Eq. 2 with adjustment for 1/BMI. The trend lines shown were fitted using locally weighted smoothing function. Solid and dashed lines represent Korean-Asian and New York-Caucasian, respectively.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Obesity is a global epidemic. Pacific populations, although small, have the highest rates of obesity in the world (22). A few published reports indicate that, in the Asian populations studied, there was a higher PBF and a high prevalence of obesity-related diseases at a lower BMI (2, 5, 23) compared with other race groups. The results of the present study support the hypothesis that overweight premenopausal Korean-Asian women have a higher PBF than Caucasian women. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to investigate whether the relationship between PBF and BMI in overweight premenopausal Korean women differs from that in Caucasian women.

These findings add to and are in agreement with previous reports involving Asian populations (7, 9, 21). Wang et al. (21), using DXA, showed that Asians living in the New York area had a lower BMI but a higher PBF compared with age-matched Caucasians (51 ± 17 yr). Gallagher et al. (7) reported higher PBF levels at lower BMIs in Japanese-Asians (39.3 ± 15.9 yr) compared with Caucasians (from the United States and the UK) and African-Americans. The predicted PBF values at different age ranges and BMI ranges, in the subgroup of women ages 60–79 yr with BMI over 25, were higher in Asians compared with Caucasians (7) and are consistent with the findings of He et al. (9). He et al. also found that, among postmenopausal women, with increasing BMI, Asians living in Beijing had significantly less PBF compared with African-Americans and Caucasians living in New York City.

The relationship between BMI and PBF is influenced by age and should be considered when PBF is compared among different ethnic groups (8) but has frequently been overlooked in previous reports (7, 9, 21). In the present study, although overweight premenopausal Korean-Asian women had a higher PBF than Caucasian women, with increasing age PBF was found to decrease in Korean-Asian women. This trend was not evident in the Caucasian sample. That is, at similar ages (e.g., <40 yr) and BMIs (within range studied), PBF in Asian women was greater than in Caucasian women. With increasing age, PBF decreased or at least increased to a lesser degree in Asians compared with Caucasians. At older ages (e.g., >50–60 yr) and higher BMIs (≥30.0 kg/m2), PBF in Asian women may be less compared with that in Caucasian women.

Irrespective of race/ethnicity, a single definition is advocated by the WHO for overweight (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2). With regard to Asian populations, a WHO expert consultation committee recently suggested an additional definition or trigger point for public health action at a BMI of 23 kg/m2 (22, 24). The inference here is that the risk from obesity for Asians with a BMI of 23 kg/m2 may be similar to that for Caucasians with a BMI of 25 kg/m2. The relative risk of having at least one risk factor for cardiovascular disease was reported high at a low BMI in Chinese, Filipinos, and Koreans (23), and the progression in the prevalence of diabetes with increasing BMI and waist circumference was observed in all populations (23). Although Asians had the smallest BMI, 63% had a PBF above the median values for whites within each gender (20). High rates of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia have been noted in middle-aged and elderly Koreans even at relatively low BMIs (10, 11). The relative risk of disorders in elderly Koreans doubled at a BMI of 23.0–24.0 kg/m2 and tripled at a BMI of 26.0 kg/m2 compared with a baseline BMI of 18.5–22.0 kg/m2 (10).

There is disagreement, however, on the use of WHO/International Association for the Study of Obesity/International Obesity Task Force proposed lower cutoff points for overweight (BMI 23.0 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI 25.0 kg/m2) in Asian and Pacific Island populations (16, 17). Central to this debate is the accuracy of BMI to define obesity since body composition profiles differ across race groups, including among Asian populations (5, 7, 21). The amounts of lean tissue, adipose tissue, and adipose tissue distribution are important contributors to obesity-related diseases. Adipose tissue can be divided into subcutaneous adipose tissue and visceral adipose tissue. In obese men (13), obese postmenopausal woman (1), and obese premenopausal women (14), visceral adipose tissue has been reported to be a marker of insulin resistance. In Asians, higher PBF and higher quantities of visceral adipose tissue have been reported compared with African-Americans and Caucasians (12, 18). Asian-American women had a higher log-transformed visceral adipose tissue compared with European-American women, after adjusting for age and total body fat (12). Tanaka et al. (18) reported that Japanese adults had a significantly greater amount of abdominal visceral fat compared with Caucasians after adjusting for age, sex, and abdominal subcutaneous fat. In the present study, however, adipose tissue/fat distribution was not measured.

The present study findings show that, in the BMI range studied, PBF increased with age in Caucasians and decreased with age in Korean-Asians. Two possible factors could explain this difference: one is racial background (i.e., genetics) and the other is nutrition/environment. The South Korean population continues to advance through a nutrition transition, and significant socioeconomic changes are ongoing. Older Koreans (>50 yr) were exposed to a relative nutritional deficit, whereas younger Koreans (<40 yr) have not had such an experience and have, in fact, likely experienced a relative nutritional excess and less physical activity. Therefore, a cohort effect may be influencing BMI.

Study Limitations

Sample representativeness.   The participants in this study were nonrandomly selected volunteers in BMI and age ranges not representative of all women. Had subjects with lower BMIs been included, a more representative cohort would have improved the external validity of the results. All subjects were in good health, which may not be representative of the general premenopausal populations in their respective locations.

In conclusion, the relationship between PBF and BMI was assessed in two distinct populations that differed by race. This study demonstrates in a Korean-Asian sample that the BMI-fat relationship differs significantly from that in a comparable group of Caucasian women. Investigators who use BMI as an index of fatness should be aware of the well documented differences in the relationship of BMI and fatness across race/ethnic groups.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study was supported in part by funding from Konkuk and Kyunghee University (Korean data) and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grants DK-42618, projects 3 and 4 (Caucasian data) and P30-DK-26687.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
S. Chung was a visiting fellow at New York Obesity Research Center and participated in data analysis and manuscript writing. M. Song, H. Shin, and D. Kim collected Korean data. Q. He and S. Heshka participated in data analyses. J. Wang and J Thornton participated in DXA phantom quality control. F. X. Pi-Sunyer and B. Laferrère provided Caucasian data. D. Gallagher was involved in study design, data quality control, and manuscript writing.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for correspondence: D. Gallagher, Obesity Research Center, 1090 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10025 (E-mail: dg108{at}columbia.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Brochu M, Starling RD, Tchernof A, Matthews DE, Garcia-Rubi E, and Poehlman ET. Visceral adipose tissue is an independent correlate of glucose disposal in older obese postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85: 2378–2384, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Deurenberg-Yap M, Chew SK, and Deurenberg P. Elevated body fat percentage and cardiovascular risks at low body mass index levels among Singaporean Chinese, Malays and Indians. Obes Rev 3: 209–215, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Deurenberg-Yap M, Schmidt G, van Staveren WA, and Deurenberg P. The paradox of low body mass index and high body fat percentage among Chinese, Malays and Indians in Singapore. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24: 1011–1017, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Deurenberg P and Deurenberg-Yap M. Validity of body composition methods across ethnic population groups. Acta Diabetol 40: 246–249, 2003.[CrossRef]
  5. Deurenberg P, Deurenberg-Yap M, and Guricci S. Asians are different from Caucasians and from each other in their body mass index/body fat percent relationship. Obes Rev 3: 141–146, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Fernandez JR, Heo M, Heymsfield SB, Pierson RN Jr, Pi-Sunyer FX, Wang ZM, Wang J, Hayes M, Allison DB, and Gallagher D. Is percentage body fat differentially related to body mass index in Hispanic Americans, African Americans, and European Americans? Am J Clin Nutr 77: 71–75, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB, Heo M, Jebb SA, Murgatroyd PR, and Sakamoto Y. Healthy percentage body fat ranges: an approach for developing guidelines based on body mass index. Am J Clin Nutr 72: 694–701, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Gallagher D, Visser M, Sepulveda D, Pierson RN, Harris T, and Heymsfield SB. How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex, and ethnic groups? Am J Epidemiol 143: 228–239, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. He Q, Sun AJ, Heshika S, Kim J, Heymsfield SB, Wang J, Pierson RN Jr, and Gallagher D. Beijing-Asian compared to African-American and Caucasian postmenopausal women: the relation of percent body fat to body mass index (Abstract). FASEB J 18: 549, 2004.
  10. Kim Y, Suh YK, and Choi H. BMI and metabolic disorders in South Korean adults: 1998 Korea National Health and Nutrition Survey. Obes Res 12: 445–453, 2004.[ISI][Medline]
  11. Moon OR, Kim NS, Jang SM, Yoon TH, and Kim SO. The relationship between body mass index and the prevalence of obesity-related diseases based on the 1995 National Health Interview Survey in Korea. Obes Rev 3: 191–196, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Park YW, Allison DB, Heymsfield SB, and Gallagher D. Larger amounts of visceral adipose tissue in Asian Americans. Obes Res 9: 381–387, 2001.[ISI][Medline]
  13. Ross R, Aru J, Freeman J, Hudson R, and Janssen I. Abdominal adiposity and insulin resistance in obese men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 282: E657–E663, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ross R, Freeman J, Hudson R, and Janssen I. Abdominal obesity, muscle composition, and insulin resistance in premenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 5044–5051, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Song MY, Chung WS, and Shin HD. Clinical trial of herbal formula on weight loss in obese premenopausal Korean females (Abstract). FASEB J 18: 874, 2004.
  16. Stevens J and Nowicki EM. Body mass index and mortality in Asian populations: implications for obesity cut-points. Nutr Rev 61: 104–107, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  17. Stevens J. Ethnic-specific revisions of body mass index cutoffs to define overweight and obesity in Asians are not warranted. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 27: 1297–1299, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  18. Tanaka S, Horimai C, and Katsukawa F. Ethnic differences in abdominal visceral fat accumulation between Japanese, African-Americans, and Caucasians: a meta-analysis. Acta Diabetol 40: 302–304, 2003.[CrossRef]
  19. Wang J, Laferrère B, Thornton JC, Pierson RN Jr, and Pi-Sunyer FX. Regional subcutaneous-fat loss induced by caloric restriction in obese women. Obes Res 10: 885–890, 2002.[ISI][Medline]
  20. Wang J, Thornton JC, Burastero S, Shen J, Tanenbaum S, Heymsfield SB, and Pierson RN Jr. Comparisons for body mass index and body fat percent among Puerto Ricans, blacks, whites and Asians living in the New York City area. Obes Res 4: 377–384, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
  21. Wang J, Thornton JC, Russell M, Burastero S, Heymsfield S, and Pierson RN Jr. Asians have lower body mass index (BMI) but higher percent body fat than do whites: comparisons of anthropometric measurements. Am J Clin Nutr 60: 23–28, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. WHO. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 363: 157–163, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  23. WHO/IASO/IOTF. The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment. Melbourne, Australia: Health Communications, 2000.
  24. World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Geneva: WHO, 2000. (WHO Obesity Technical Report Series no. 894)




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/1/103    most recent
01153.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chung, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chung, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.