Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 98: 1434-1441, 2005. First published January 7, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00921.2004
8750-7587/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/4/1434    most recent
00921.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Black, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stone, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Black, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stone, P. J.

Effects of elastase on the mechanical and failure properties of engineered elastin-rich matrices

Lauren D. Black,1 Kelly K. Brewer,1 Shirley M. Morris,2 Barbara M. Schreiber,2 Paul Toselli,2 Matthew A. Nugent,2 Bela Suki,1 and Phillip J. Stone2

1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston; and 2Department of Biochemistry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

Submitted 24 August 2004 ; accepted in final form 20 December 2004


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Pulmonary emphysema and vessel wall aneurysms are diseases characterized by elastolytic damage to elastin fibers that leads to mechanical failure. To model this, neonatal rat aortic smooth muscle cells were cultured, accumulating an extracellular matrix rich in elastin, and mechanical measurements were made before and during enzymatic digestion of elastin. Specifically, the cells in the cultures were killed with sodium azide, the cultures were lifted from the flask, cut into small strips, and fixed to a computer-controlled lever arm and a force transducer. The strips were subjected to a broadband displacement signal to study the dynamic mechanical properties of the samples. Also, quasi-static stress-strain curves were measured. The dynamic data were fit to a linear viscoelastic model to estimate the tissues' loss (G) and storage (H) modulus coefficients, which were evaluated before and during 30 min of elastase treatment, at which point a failure test was performed. G and H decreased significantly to 30% of their baseline values after 30 min. The failure stress of control samples was ~15 times higher than that of the digested samples. Understanding the structure-function relationship of elastin networks and the effects of elastolytic injury on their mechanical properties can lead to the elucidation of the mechanism of elastin fiber failure and evaluation of possible treatments to enhance repair in diseases involving elastolytic injury.

storage modulus; loss modulus; cell culture; smooth muscle cell


THE EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX (ECM) protein elastin is resilient and displays mechanical properties similar to rubber that allow it to linearly store energy with little loss (8, 31). As such, it plays an important role in the functional properties of tissues and organs that require flexibility and elasticity, such as blood vessel walls and lungs. Degradation of the elastin network in diseases such as pulmonary emphysema or vessel wall aneurysms greatly affects the normal function of the tissues. Investigators have shown that the proteolysis of lung tissue with elastase mimics the destruction of elastin in emphysema (15, 19). The main functional effect of this tissue destruction is a greatly decreased overall tissue stiffness (14, 20, 34). It is believed that uncontrolled elastase activity is responsible for the lung pathology associated with this disease (2, 13, 24). Likewise, it has been postulated that the cause of vessel wall aneurysms is a failure in elastin repair. A few groups have correlated the loss of elastin content in aneurysmal vessels to a change in the wall's mechanical properties (9, 17, 32). However, to our knowledge, the failure properties of tissue that has been subjected to elastolytic injury have not been characterized.

Originally, elastin repair was thought to occur through a sequential process involving debridement of damaged fibers followed by synthesis of new elastin. Our studies of elastase-induced damage to the ECM of cell cultures led to the identification of a previously unknown repair mechanism, salvage repair, in which damaged elastin is repaired without debridement (28). Using primary neonatal rat aortic smooth muscle cells (NNRSMC), as well as pulmonary fibroblasts, we showed that these elastogenic cells are capable of restoring biochemical and ultrastructural properties to elastin in the ECM after elastase treatment (22, 28, 29). We also reported that recombinant tropoelastin, the precursor to elastin, is incorporated and cross-linked into existing extracellular elastin (12, 27). However, the mechanical properties of the repaired matrices have also not been assessed.

The goal of this study was to measure the mechanical and failure properties of an engineered elastin network and to determine how these properties change with elastase digestion. In an attempt to characterize the static and dynamic mechanical properties as well as the failure properties of engineered material produced by cultured elastogenic cells, we used the NNRSMC culture system to study the effects of elastin degradation on the mechanical properties of the ECM. Moreover, we developed a new system for measuring mechanical properties of stretched tissue based on a previous design (14), which allowed for the measurement of both static and dynamic mechanical properties as well as failure properties of engineered sheets. A new tissue-stretching system was essential because of the difficulty of working with material as thin as the ECM sheets used in this study. Characterizing the changes in the mechanical properties resulting from the degradation of elastin is critical to understanding the pathology of diseases involving elastolytic injury and will provide a necessary basis for future studies assessing the effectiveness of repair processes.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Culture

The engineered ECM sheets that were used in this study were derived from NNRSMC cultures, which are highly elastogenic (26). NNRSMCs were isolated from 1- to 3-day-old Sprague-Dawley rats and grown in primary culture with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 3.1 g/l sodium bicarbonate, 1% sodium pyruvate, 1% penicillin and streptomycin (DV3.7), and 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS) as described previously (27). After subcultivation into first passage in 25-cm2 tissue culture flasks (2 x 104 cells/cm2), the cells were maintained for 6 wk with 5 ml of DV3.7 containing 10% FBS. The medium was changed twice weekly, and the cell cultures were routinely monitored by phase contrast microscopy. After 6 wk in culture, the cells were killed with 5% sodium azide in Puck's saline [in mM: 140 NaCl, 5.4 KCl, 1.1 KH2PO4, 1.1 Na2HPO4, 6.1 glucose (pH 7.4)] (29) and stored at 4°C. Before use, the cultures were infiltrated with a gelatin solution, which, after the gelatin solidified, allowed the cultures to be stripped from the culture flasks. Previous studies that used this technique have shown that the cultures were removed intact (21).

Measurement of Insoluble Elastin

To quantify the elastin in cultures that had been lifted, rectangular pieces of gelatin containing the ECM sheet were heated at 50°C to melt the gelatin, washed several times, and the cell layer was subjected to hot alkali treatment (0.1 N NaOH at 95°C for 45 min) (16). The hot alkali-insoluble residue (elastin) was hydrolyzed in 6N HCl for 24 h at 110°C. Amino acid analysis was performed (Beckman model 6300 with System Gold software, Palo Alto, CA) to confirm the characteristic amino acid composition of the elastin, consisting of the elastin cross-links desmosine and isodesmosine, and more than 80% nonpolar amino acids (26). The amount of elastin was calculated as the sum of the amino acids (in nmol) multiplied by the average amino acid mass of 85 ng/nmol. The elastin content of two cell layers cultured at different times was 73 (SD 13) µg elastin/cm2 of cell layer (n = 2).

Experimental Setup and Data Acquisition

A new uniaxial tissue-stretching system based on a previous design was developed (14). The system consisted of a computer-controlled lever arm with a built-in, large-scale force transducer (model 300B dual-mode lever system, Aurora Scientific, Ontario, Canada) on one side and a more sensitive force transducer (model 403A, Aurora Scientific) on the other. The large-scale force transducer was needed to record the force data for failure tests of the engineered sheets, because the forces during these tests exceeded those that could be measured with the more sensitive force transducer used to record the dynamic mechanics data and stress-strain curves. A LABView (National Instruments, Austin, TX) program was developed to run the system and record data. The data was low-pass filtered at a cutoff frequency of 10 Hz (901P Filter Bank, Frequency Devices, Haverhill, MA) before being sampled by the data-acquisition card (DAQCard-6062E, National Instruments) and connector block (BNC-2110, National Instruments) at a sampling rate of 30 Hz. The test stand for the system was designed with a 22-ml bath and a glass base that fit on top of a hot plate. The hot plate was needed to solubulize the gelatin that surrounds the samples after they are attached to the stretcher systems' feet so that it could be washed away.

The alignment and accuracy of the new system was tested as described previously (33). Specifically, we measured the dynamic mechanical properties of a steel spring, which should have a constant storage modulus over the frequency range of the measurements and little to no loss modulus. The storage modulus varied only slightly with frequency, and the loss modulus was more than one order of magnitude smaller than the storage modulus. The overall hysteresis of the system was ~0.05.

Protocol

The ECM sheets were cut into 5-mm-wide by 15-mm-long strips from the sheet of gelatin that was lifted from the culture flasks. Samples were affixed to small metal plates (5 mm x 5 mm) with cyanoacrylate glue while still encased in the gelatin, leaving the working area of the sample at 5 mm x 5 mm. These small metal plates were attached to the force transducers and length controller via steel wires. Once the sample was attached to the system, the bath was filled with 22 ml of PBS and the whole system was placed on top of the hot plate and heated until the gelatin dissolved (50°C). The PBS containing the solubilized gelatin was then removed, and the sample was rinsed three to four times with room temperature PBS using an eyedropper. The bath was then refilled with 22 ml of fresh PBS also at room temperature.

Initially, three baseline quasi-static stress-strain (SS) curves to 25% strain were collected to precondition the sample (strain rate of 0.75%/s). Here, we define stress, T, as the recorded force divided by an estimated cross-sectional area (21. 1 µm thick x 5 mm wide) and strain, {epsilon}, as the displacement divided by the sample's initial length, l0, defined as the shortest length at which a change in force was detected (Eqs. 1 and 2, respectively).

(1)

(2)

The estimated cross-sectional area (21.1 SD 2.7 µm) was calculated as an average thickness of several measurements along the length of a fixed control sample at 0% strain. Although the fixing process may have caused the sample to shrink, this value is still within the range (20–30 µm) reported by Toselli et al. (30). This measurement was followed by a dynamic measurement in which length oscillations of amplitude ±5% strain were superimposed on a static operating strain of 20%. To do this, the force was recorded during a broadband displacement signal, which is the sum of six sine waves with frequencies between 0.11 and 3.45 Hz that were chosen according to Yuan et al. (33). Force and length data were recorded for the dynamic measurements for a minimum of seven cycles of the waveform (~2 min). After the dynamic measurement, there was a 5-min equilibration period followed by another baseline SS curve to 25% strain and another baseline dynamic measurement. For control samples, the SS and dynamic mechanics measurements were repeated at 5, 10, 20, and 30 min after the last baseline measurement. For treatment of samples with elastase, porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was added to the bath at a final concentration of 0.06 IU/ml, and the SS curve and dynamic mechanics measurements were repeated at 2, 5, 10, 20, and 30 min after the addition of the enzyme. All samples were then stretched to failure at the end of the 30-min measurement period. This protocol was implemented on 10 control samples and 10 PPE-digested samples.

Morphology

Stretched and unstretched control tissues were processed for microscopy to visualize the effect of stretching on the elastin fibers in the engineered sheets. Samples were fixed in glutaraldehyde and embedded in Epon, according to a method previously described (26).

Data Analysis

Dynamics and stress-strain curve analysis.   The dynamic moduli of the engineered tissue sheets were calculated as a function of frequency for the time points described in the protocol above. Briefly, the dynamic moduli were calculated as follows: force and length data were converted to stress-strain data (Equations 1 and 2) and then converted into the frequency domain by taking the fast Fourier transform (FFT). The complex modulus of the tissue, E*, which is defined as the complex ratio of stress as a function of frequency, T({omega}), divided by strain as a function of frequency, {epsilon}({omega}), was then determined (Equation 3).

(3)
This was actually estimated as the ratio of the cross-power spectrum of T with {epsilon} and the auto power spectrum of {epsilon}. The spectra were calculated on blocks of measured data using 75% overlap and then averaged. The data were taken for several cycles of the waveform to obtain a sufficient number of blocks in the estimate of the spectra. The coherence function was also calculated to assess the quality of the spectra and E*. The real part of the complex modulus, E*, is the storage modulus (E'), representing the portion of the stress that is in phase with the strain and is thus a measure of the ability of the sample to elastically store energy as a function of frequency. The imaginary part of E* is the loss modulus (E'') and this represents the portion of stress that is in phase with strain rate and is thus a measure of the amount of energy loss the sample undergoes as a function of frequency. These were then plotted as functions of frequency and compared before and after elastase digestion.

The complex modulus, E*, was also fit with the single-compartment model, first proposed by Hantos (11) as follows:

(4)
Here G is the tissue loss modulus coefficient, H is the tissue storage modulus coefficient, R is a Newtonian resistance, I is an inertial term, {omega} is the angular frequency with units of radians per second, {omega}n is the normalized angular frequency [i.e., {omega}n = {omega}/(1 rad/s)], a normalization that results in a stress unit for G and H, and {beta} is the stress relaxation exponent defined by the equation:

(5)

Because R and I are generally small, the model described by Eqs. 4 and 5 is called the "constant phase" model because the phase angle of E*, {beta}{pi}, is independent of frequency. The parameters G and H are used to simplify the comparison of the storage and loss moduli during digestion. We compared G and H as a function of elastase digestion and these parameters were used to determine the degradation of the tissues' dynamic mechanics. To account for the variability in the cross-sectional area that was not measured for each sample, each data set was normalized to the stress value at 5% strain for that sample.

To quantify the changes in the SS relationship while elastin was being degraded, SS curves were fit with a two-parameter exponential curve with the following form:

(6)
Here T is stress as a function of time and {epsilon} is strain as a function of time. Taking the log of both sides, this equation can be written into a form in which simple linear regression can be used:

(7)
From this curve fitting, the SS curves were quantitatively analyzed using two parameters: A, which represents the amplitude of the curve, and b, which represents how nonlinear the curve is. The changes in these parameters with elastase digestion were tracked.

Failure curve analysis.   Each failure test curve was converted to a stress-strain curve, and several indices from each curve were measured for comparison to determine the effect that elastase digestion had on the failure properties of the engineered sheets. The indices that were recorded included the maximum stress, the stress at the first break, the strain at first break, the failure stress, and the failure strain. The way in which these indices were determined is illustrated in Fig. 1 for a control sample.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Example of a failure test for a control sample. Shown are the indices recorded for each failure test for comparison.

 
Statistics.   Model parameters and SS curve exponential fit parameters were analyzed by two-way ANOVA for repeated measures (SigmaStat, San Rafael, CA). Differences between treatments were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. Student-Newman-Keuls analysis was used for all pair-wise multiple comparisons. Statistical comparisons between control and elastase-digested failure test parameters were made with an unpaired Student's t-test. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. All data are presented as means (SD).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Morphology

Stretched and unstretched tissues were treated with elastin stains and compared (Fig. 2). The stained elastin fibers are initially randomly oriented and wavy at 0% strain (Fig. 2A). However, after fixing tissue at 30% strain (Fig. 2B), the majority of the elastin fibers are oriented in the direction of strain and have been pulled taut.



View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Longitudinal sections of the extracellular matrix (ECM) sheet stained with acid Orcein at 0% strain (A) and 30% strain (B) at a magnification of x1,000. Note the straightening and thinning of the elastin fibers with increased strain.

 
Dynamic Mechanics and Stress Strain Data

Figure 3 shows a representative example of the dynamic moduli vs. frequency, at baseline, and after 30 min of elastase digestion. The data points are the actual data generated, and the solid line represents the constant phase model fit to the data. The storage modulus, E', is nearly 20 times larger than the loss modulus, E'', both before and after elastase digestion. The constant-phase model fits the data well in both conditions and the resulting loss, G, and storage, H, modulus coefficient values are shown on the figure. The E' of the sample before elastase digestion is ~74 kPa at the lowest frequency and it increases slightly to ~78 kPa at the highest frequency. The E'' is more than one order of magnitude smaller, and its value is ~4 kPa at the lowest frequency and ~8 kPa at the highest frequency.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Example of dynamic moduli data for a sample at baseline ({square}) and after 30 min of elastase-digestion ({blacksquare}) with the storage modulus shown in A and the loss modulus is shown in B. Points represent the actual recorded data, whereas the lines are the fits of the constant phase model given in Equation 4. Shown are the corresponding tissue elastance, H, and tissue damping, G, parameters for the model fit.

 
After elastase digestion, the E' of the sample is ~24 kPa at the lowest frequency and it increases even less than in the pretreatment case to only ~26 kPa. The E'' has been reduced to ~1.8 kPa at the lowest frequency and increases to ~2.8 kPa at the highest frequency.

Representative stress-strain loops for a sample at baseline and after elastase digestion are shown in Fig. 4. The decrease in the slope of the curve after digestion signifies that the sample is generating less stress than it did at baseline for the same strain. This means that the sample is less stiff, corresponding to the loss of intact elastin in the sample that accompanies digestion with elastase. The decrease in the slope of the curve also follows from the dynamic data, as the slope of the SS curve is essentially the tissue quasi-static elastance parameter that is closely related to the dynamic elastance, which decreased with digestion (Fig. 3).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Example stress-strain loops for a sample at baseline (solid line) and after 30 min of elastase digestion (dashed line). Note that the arrows display the direction of the change in strain for the loop.

 
Comparison of Pooled Data

Figure 5 displays the average data of the constant phase model fit parameters normalized by the stress of the samples at 5% strain at baseline for 10 control samples and 10 elastase-digested samples over the time course of 30 min. This normalization was done to minimize the dependence of the data on the estimated cross-sectional area derived from a single sample. For clarity, these normalized loss (G) and storage (H) modulus coefficients are referred to as Hn and Gn, respectively, and are defined as follows.

(8)

(9)



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Mean and SD of the time course of normalized tissue elastance, Hn (A), and tissue damping, Gn (B), parameters during control ({square}) and elastase-digested ({blacksquare}) conditions. Normalization is defined in Eqs. 8 and 9. Note that in the Gn plot, elastase-digested data have been shifted by 1 min to the right for clarification. Treatment x time interaction by ANOVA for Hn data (P < 0.001) and Gn data (P = 0.002).

 
As expected, the control samples stay relatively constant throughout the time period for both Hn and Gn. The Hn and Gn of the elastase-digested samples are not statistically significantly different from the Hn and Gn of the control samples at zero minutes. However, by 2 min after the addition of elastase, the digested samples are already reduced from their baseline value of Hn and by 5 min after the addition of elastase their Hn is significantly less than the control samples. The Hn of the elastase-digested samples continues to decrease until the end of the 30-min digestion period. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed a significant interaction between treatment and time in the Hn data (P < 0.001).

Examination of the Gn data reveals that the elastase-digested samples are significantly reduced from their baseline value at time zero by 5 min after the addition of the enzyme. It is important to note that there is no significant difference between the Gn in the control sample and in the elastase-digested samples at any time point. However, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed that by 20 min, the Gn data of the elastase-treated group was significantly reduced from the baseline value (P < 0.001). Once again there was a significant interaction between treatment and time in the Gn data (P = 0.002).

The pooled data for the parameters of the exponential fit to the SS curves were plotted (Fig. 6). We normalized the amplitude parameter to minimize its dependence on the estimated area of the samples. The normalized amplitude parameter, An, is defined as the amplitude parameter, A, divided by the stress at 5% strain for that sample (similar to equations 8 and 9). An decreases from baseline for the elastase-digested samples, and by 10 min after the start of the elastase treatment, it is statistically significantly reduced from the control samples. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA found a significant interaction between time and treatment (P = 0.004) for the An data. The exponential scaling factor, b, is not normalized and does not appear to change for either the control or the elastase-digested samples. In addition, there is no significant difference between the values of the two groups for b at any time point.



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Mean and SD of the time course of the normalized amplitude parameter, An, (A) and the exponent parameter, b, (B) of the exponential equation fit (Equation 6) to the stress-strain curves during control ({square}) and elastase-digested ({blacksquare}) conditions. Treatment x time interaction by ANOVA for An data (P = 0.004). No significance between control and elastase-digested data for b parameter.

 
Failure Test Data

The parameters taken from the failure test data (see Fig. 1) are shown in Fig. 7. The parameters that were statistically significantly different between the control and elastase-treated samples were the maximum stress achieved, the stress at the first break, and the failure stress. All of these indicate that these matrices, which are abundant in elastin, were considerably more resistant to mechanical failure before elastase-digestion than after, because they had a much larger maximum stress, a much larger stress at the first break, and a larger failure stress. There was no difference in the failure strain or the strain at first break between the control and elastase-digested samples.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Comparison of the means and SD of the failure test indices for control (black) and elastase-digested (gray) conditions. *Significant difference in those indices between elastase-digested and control samples (P < 0.05).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The goal of this study was to measure the mechanical and failure properties of an engineered elastin network and to determine how these properties change with elastase digestion. To accomplish this goal, a new system was developed to measure the mechanical properties of the ECM of cultured NNRSMCs. The new system was necessary due to the physical properties of the ECM sheets. The sheets are extremely thin and very delicate. Additionally, when they are removed from an aqueous environment, the samples immediately roll up into a cylindrical structure due to the effects of surface tension on the sheet, which precludes their attachment to the apparatus. As a result, the new system needed to be designed so that the samples could be attached to the system's feet while still encased in gelatin. This allowed the sample to be glued to the feet as a flat sheet, which simplifies any stress calculations. In addition, the system had to be able to sit on a hotplate to allow solubilization of the gelatin once the sample was glued to the system's feet. This was accomplished by building a fairly large bath with a glass bottom into the test stand of the system. The increase of the bath size from the previous system (14) allowed for a bulkier strip of gelatin to be glued to the system's feet, while the glass bottom permitted faster heat transfer into the bath without melting the plastic of the test stand. The glass bottom could also be important in future studies as it will allow imaging of the samples while attached to the mechanical system. The system was validated by testing the dynamic mechanical properties of a steel spring. On the basis of the analysis of data from the test, the system was found to have little hysteresis or inertia that would affect the data.

Brief heating to 50°C should have little effect on elastin crosslinking or chemistry, because aorta elastin isolated using NaOH at 95°C was not different in amino acid composition from elastin isolated using cyanogen bromide in formic acid at room temperature (23, 25). Kononov et al. (14) used heating to 55°C to remove agarose from lung tissue strips and showed that it had no effect on the mechanical properties of the tissue.

The NNRSMC culture system has been used previously by our group and is a very useful system for studying elastolytic injury and repair of elastin (12, 28). An important feature of this system is the ability to alter the type and amount of structural macromolecules in the ECM of the culture (4, 3). Furthermore, cell culture models can be conveniently used to carry out experiments requiring prolonged time periods, such as efforts to repair damaged elastin by treatments with recombinant tropoelastin. These cultures (25 cm2 surface area x 73 (SD 13) µg elastin/cm2) contained 1,825 (SD 325) µg elastin compared with our reported values of 1,828 (SD 222) µg (28) and accounted for "up to 50% of the total protein" (28). In another study, elastin content was 47.2% of protein in 6-wk-old cultures (3). Rat aorta contains 40.6% elastin (25). Native lung typically has somewhat lower values for elastin; for example, rat lung has 13.4% elastin (25).

The current study demonstrated the feasibility of measuring the mechanical and failure properties of strips taken from the ECM of this culture system. ECM sheets were derived from cultures that were grown in the absence of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) that resulted in a network comprised of cross-linked elastin and proteoglycans with trace amounts (<1% of total protein) of fibrillar collagen (18). To date, no one has reported the mechanical properties of the ECM of this system. Quasi-static stress-strain relationships, dynamic mechanical properties, and failure properties of the engineered elastin-rich matrices both with and without 30 min of elastase treatment were measured. Because elastase also digests the proteoglycans in the matrix, the mechanical properties measured in this particular study are a function of both elastin and proteoglycan digestion (4, 5).

Elastin is known to have a fairly linear stress-strain relationship (8, 31), and yet all data taken in this study showed a nonlinear toe at the beginning of the stress-strain curve (see Fig. 4). We believe that this nonlinearity in the stress-strain relationship is due to the effects of the reorganization of the elastin network as macroscopic strain increases. This reorganization comes about because the elastin fibers in the ECM of the NNRSMC cultures have no preferred direction and thus the fibers are randomly oriented and have a wavy configuration at 0% strain. As strain in the sheet increases, those fibers that are not initially oriented in the direction of the strain begin to reorient into this direction, and as they do so the waviness decreases (Fig. 2) and the effective spring constant of the system increases, which produces a nonlinear response in stress. Once the majority of the fibers are aligned with the direction of strain, there is a more linear stress-strain relationship as seen in Fig. 1 just before failure occurs.

To compare the SS data at various time points in the protocol and to elucidate the differences in SS data between control and digested samples, the stress-strain data was fit to a two-parameter exponential curve as defined by Eq. 6. As shown in Fig. 6A, the normalized amplitude parameter, An, was significantly decreased after 10 min of digestion. This normalization was used to remove the effects of the uncertainty in the estimated cross-sectional area on the stress. The exponent, b (Fig. 6B), stayed fairly constant throughout the 30-min period and there was no significant difference between the control and digested samples. The decrease in the amplitude constant, An, indicates that digestion caused a decreased total stiffness of the tissue. One can also conclude from these data that digestion had no effect on the nonlinearity of the curve as represented by b. This supports the idea that the nonlinearity in the SS curves of the matrices is related to network effects, because orientation of the elastin fibers in the digested samples should still be random with respect to the direction of strain and thus the nonlinearity associated with fiber reorientation should persist.

One would expect that a sample that contained a high proportion of elastin would have a much larger storage modulus than loss modulus as this represents the component of the complex modulus that is in phase with the strain. Indeed, the Gn data were almost 20 times smaller than Hn (Fig. 5). During digestion, these parameters decreased to ~30% of their baseline value such that by 5 min after the addition of elastase, the digested samples had a significantly lower storage modulus coefficient. The loss modulus coefficient was not significantly different between control and digested samples at any time point. This is likely due to the fact that the loss modulus coefficient is very small for these tissues because they contain a high proportion of elastin. Also, the effect of noise on the loss modulus is nearly 20 times larger than on the storage modulus, thus the large variability could obscure any significance. It is important to note, however, that the digested samples did have a significant decrease in Gn from their baseline values by 20 min after treatment. It is possible that some of the decrease in the storage modulus coefficient with time is due to stress relaxation. The stress relaxation function consistent with the constant phase model has a power law functional form (34). The stress relaxation exponent, {beta}, of the power law is ~0.06 for this material, which corresponds to a 17% decrease in the storage modulus coefficient over the 30-min measurement period (a decrease to 94% of baseline per decade of time over 3 decades). The measured decrease in the storage modulus coefficient in our data was ~70%, which means that a large part of the decrease we measure must be related to the effect of the elastase. However, even the 17% contribution due to stress relaxation is likely an upper bound because there was no change in the control data for the storage modulus coefficient within the same time period.

Several groups previously measured the elastic moduli of elastin in arterial wall through both in vivo (1) and in vitro methods (7). The reported values are in the range of 1–5 MPa, more than one order of magnitude larger than those we report here. Both of these studies used a model that assumed that elastin and collagen fibers were in parallel. The elastic modulus of elastin was then calculated by assuming that the low-strain, linear portion of the stress-strain curves in arteries is only an effect of the elastin, which is likely not the case. In fact, Yuan et al. (34) found that collagen contributed significantly to the stress-strain behavior of lung tissue at low prestress. On the basis of their data the result of not including the effects of collagen fibers in the low-strain, linear region could increase the elastic modulus of elastin by a factor of two. In addition, both of these measurements take place with the smooth muscle cells intact. The active contraction of smooth muscle cells can produce an intrinsic prestress on the ECM, which in turn can further increase the estimated modulus of elastin.

Structure also plays an important role in determining the modulus of a fiber network. If the fiber network is entirely random, we could expect a lower modulus compared with a network whose fibers are aligned in the direction of the strain (as in the vessel wall). This is because some of the strain energy developed in the stress-strain curve must go into reorienting the fibers. A better comparison for our tissue modulus would likely be the modulus of purified elastin, which has been reported to be ~670 kPa (10). We calculated the static incremental Young's modulus of our samples from the higher strain, linear region of the failure curves where presumably the elastin fibers are aligned with the strain. These modulus values were between 400 and 500 kPa, which is close to the purified elastin modulus mentioned above. This incremental modulus calculation is done near the failure strain and yet the stress is calculated from the thickness at 0% strain and not the decreased thickness near failure. This could alter the calculated modulus by as much as a factor of two, thus the 400–500 kPa range would be an underestimation and the real modulus is likely much closer to the previously reported values.

The failure stress of the control samples was ~15 times larger than that of the digested samples (Fig. 7). This is to be expected based on the decreased stiffness of the samples that were digested with elastase. However, it is interesting to note that the failure strain was not different between the control and digested samples. This finding raises some important questions. For example, where might elastin networks break? If the elastin fibers form a continuous network across the sample then the failure of the network may be due to failure of the elastin itself. The reduced failure stress would be a result of destroyed and/or damaged elastin no longer contributing to the buildup of stress, and the failure strain remaining the same after treatment would then likely be a result of some innate critical strain in the elastin molecule, similar to St. Venant's theory of maximum normal strain (6). On the other hand, if the elastin network is not continuous across the sample then microfibrils and/or proteoglycans can also contribute to the failure properties. Microfibrils and proteoglycans in this instance would serve to transfer longitudinal stresses between fibers through shear. The fact that PPE digests proteoglycans (4, 5) would then also contribute to the reduction in failure stress after elastase treatment. In pulmonary fibroblast cultures, microfibrils are exposed by elastase-induced degradation of elastin and may be relatively resistant to elastase (22). In this instance, the elastin fiber network would be expected to fail first. This would result in a lower failure stress, due to fiber destruction and/or degradation, and a similar failure strain as control samples as a result of the innate critical strain of the elastin molecule.

There are some limitations in the new mechanical testing system. Currently the samples are assumed to have an estimated thickness that does not change with increasing strain. This estimated thickness is considered to be the same for all samples. Although the normalization of the dynamic measurements by the stress at 5% strain was able to reduce the spread of the data to some extent, there is still considerable variability in the data that could be generated by the inconsistency of the content of the samples throughout the thickness. Instrumentation is being developed to accurately measure the thickness of the samples during stretching. In future studies we will be able to calculate the true stress as opposed to an estimated engineering stress. This should decrease the sample-to-sample variability that was seen in this study.

In summary, this study was designed to develop the tools and methods to investigate the mechanical properties of engineered ECM sheets derived from NNRSMC cultures as a model for understanding mechanical failure of elastin in pulmonary emphysema and vessel wall aneurysms. Once the new mechanical system was developed and validated, the static and dynamic mechanical properties, as well as the failure properties, of these elastin-rich ECM sheets were characterized before, during, and after 30 min of elastase digestion. Significant decreases in both static and dynamic stiffness were noted after digestion, and overall failure stress in the samples that were digested by elastase was significantly reduced. This new measurement system will likely have wide-ranging applications in evaluating the functional properties of ECM produced by cells under a variety of controlled treatment conditions.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Grant EB-000988.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. J. Stone, Dept. of Biochemistry, 715 Albany St., Boston, MA 02118 (E-mail: stone{at}biochem.bumc.bu.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Armentano RL, Levenson J, Barra JG, Fischer EI, Breitbart GJ, Pichel RH, and Simon A. Assessment of elastin and collagen contribution to aortic elasticity in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 260: H1870–H1877, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Barnes PJ. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 343: 269–280, 2000.[Free Full Text]
  3. Barone LM, Faris B, Chipman SD, Toselli P, Oakes BW, and Franzblau C. Alteration of the extracellular matrix of smooth muscle cells by ascorbate treatment. Biochim Biophys Acta 840: 245–254, 1985.[Medline]
  4. Buczek-Thomas JA, Chu CL, Rich CB, Stone PJ, Foster JA, and Nugent MA. Heparan sulfate depletion within pulmonary fibroblasts: implications for elastogenesis and repair. J Cell Physiol 192: 294–303, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Buczek-Thomas JA, Lucey EC, Stone PJ, Chu CL, Rich CB, Carreras I, Goldstein RH, Foster JA, and Nugent MA. Elastase mediates the release of growth factors from lung in vivo. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 31: 344–350, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Collins JA. Failure of Materials in Mechanical Design: Analysis, Prediction, Prevention. New York: Wiley, 1993.
  7. Cox RH. Passive mechanics and connective tissue composition of canine arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 234: H533–H541, 1978.[Free Full Text]
  8. Fung YC. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
  9. Goodall S, Crowther M, Bell PR, and Thompson MM. The association between venous structural alterations and biomechanical weakness in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 35: 937–942, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Gray K and Stephens WG. Proceedings: the influence of various cations on the elastic modulus of purified elastin. J Physiol 251: 57P–58P, 1975.[Medline]
  11. Hantos Z, Daroczy B, Suki B, Nagy S, and Fredberg JJ. Input impedance and peripheral inhomogeneity of dog lungs. J Appl Physiol 72: 168–178, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Hsiao H, Stone PJ, Toselli P, Rosenbloom J, Franzblau C, and Schreiber BM. The role of the carboxy terminus of tropoelastin in its assembly into the elastic fiber. Connect Tissue Res 40: 83–95, 1999.[ISI][Medline]
  13. Janoff A. Elastases and emphysema. Current assessment of the protease-antiprotease hypothesis. Am Rev Respir Dis 132: 417–433, 1985.[ISI][Medline]
  14. Kononov S, Brewer K, Sakai H, Cavalcante FS, Sabayanagam CR, Ingenito EP, and Suki B. Roles of mechanical forces and collagen failure in the development of elastase-induced emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164: 1920–1926, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kuhn C, Yu SY, Chraplyvy M, Linder HE, and Senior RM. The induction of emphysema with elastase. II. Changes in connective tissue. Lab Invest 34: 372–380, 1976.[ISI][Medline]
  16. Lansing AI, Rosenthal TB, Alex M, and Dempsey EW. The structure and chemical characterization of elastic fibers as revealed by elastase and by electron microscopy. Anat Rec 114: 555–575, 1952.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Marque V, Kieffer P, Gayraud B, Lartaud-Idjouadiene I, Ramirez F, and Atkinson J. Aortic wall mechanics and composition in a transgenic mouse model of Marfan syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21: 1184–1189, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. McMahon MP, Faris B, Wolfe BL, Brown KE, Pratt CA, Toselli P, and Franzblau C. Aging effects on the elastin composition in the extracellular matrix of cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 21: 674–680, 1985.[ISI][Medline]
  19. Mercer RR and Crapo JD. Structural changes in elastic fibers after pancreatic elastase administration in hamsters. J Appl Physiol 72: 1473–1479, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Moretto A, Dallaire M, Romero P, and Ludwig M. Effect of elastase on oscillation mechanics of lung parenchymal strips. J Appl Physiol 77: 1623–1629, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Morris SM and Stone PJ. Immunocytochemical study of the degradation of elastic fibers in a living extracellular matrix. J Histochem Cytochem 43: 1145–1153, 1995.[Abstract]
  22. Morris SM, Thomas KM, Rich CB, and Stone PJ. Degradation and repair of elastic fibers in rat lung interstitial fibroblast cultures. Anat Rec 250: 397–407, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Rasmussen BL, Bruenger E, and Sandberg LB. A new method for purification of mature elastin. Anal Biochem 64: 255–259, 1975.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  24. Shapiro SD. Proteinases in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Biochem Soc Trans 30: 98–102, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  25. Starcher BC and Galione MJ. Purification and comparison of elastins from different animal species. Anal Biochem 74: 441–447, 1976.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Stone PJ, McMahon MP, Morris SM, Calore JD, and Franzblau C. Elastin in a neonatal rat smooth muscle cell culture has greatly decreased susceptibility to proteolysis by human neutrophil elastase. An in vitro model of elastolytic injury. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 23: 663–676, 1987.[ISI][Medline]
  27. Stone PJ, Morris SM, Griffin S, Mithieux S, and Weiss AS. Building elastin incorporation of recombinant human tropoelastin into extracellular matrices using nonelastogenic rat-1 fibroblasts as a source for lysyl oxidase. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 24: 733–739, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Stone PJ, Morris SM, Martin BM, McMahon MP, Faris B, and Franzblau C. Repair of protease-damaged elastin in neonatal rat aortic smooth muscle cell cultures. J Clin Invest 82: 1644–1654, 1988.[ISI][Medline]
  29. Stone PJ, Morris SM, Thomas KM, Schuhwerk K, and Mitchelson A. Repair of elastase-digested elastic fibers in acellular matrices by replating with neonatal rat-lung lipid interstitial fibroblasts or other elastogenic cell types. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 17: 289–301, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Toselli P, Faris B, Sassoon D, Jackson BA, and Franzblau C. In-situ hybridization of tropoelastin mRNA during the development of the multilayered neonatal rat aortic smooth muscle cell culture. Matrix 12: 321–332, 1992.[ISI][Medline]
  31. Urry DW, Hugel T, Seitz M, Gaub HE, Sheiba L, Dea J, Xu J, and Parker T. Elastin: a representative ideal protein elastomer. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357: 169–184, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  32. Vorp DA, Schiro BJ, Ehrlich MP, Juvonen TS, Ergin MA, and Griffith BP. Effect of aneurysm on the tensile strength and biomechanical behavior of the ascending thoracic aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 75: 1210–1214, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Yuan H, Ingenito EP, and Suki B. Dynamic properties of lung parenchyma: mechanical contributions of fiber network and interstitial cells. J Appl Physiol 83: 1420–1431; discussion 1418–1429, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Yuan H, Kononov S, Cavalcante FS, Lutchen KR, Ingenito EP, and Suki B. Effects of collagenase and elastase on the mechanical properties of lung tissue strips. J Appl Physiol 89: 3–14, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
L. D. Black, P. G. Allen, S. M. Morris, P. J. Stone, and B. Suki
Mechanical and Failure Properties of Extracellular Matrix Sheets as a Function of Structural Protein Composition
Biophys. J., March 1, 2008; 94(5): 1916 - 1929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. Jesudason, L. Black, A. Majumdar, P. Stone, and B. Suki
Differential effects of static and cyclic stretching during elastase digestion on the mechanical properties of extracellular matrices
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2007; 103(3): 803 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/4/1434    most recent
00921.2004v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Black, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stone, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Black, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stone, P. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.