|
|
||||||||
HIGHLIGHTED TOPICS
Skeletal and Cardiac Muscle Blood Flow
Schools of 1Human Movement and Exercise Science and 2Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009; and 3Cardiac Transplant Unit, Royal Perth Hospital, and West Australian Institute for Medical Research, Perth 6000, Western Australia, Australia
Submitted 2 February 2004 ; accepted in final form 9 April 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
acetylcholine; flow-mediated dilation; resistance vessel; conduit artery
The two most common methods of assessing endothelial dysfunction in vivo involve the construction of blood flow response curves to local intra-arterial infusion of agents that stimulate endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation and the measurement of shear stress and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN)-mediated large artery vasodilation by using high-resolution ultrasound (11). The former method typically involves strain gauge plethysmographic measurement of forearm blood flow responses to intrabrachial drug administration, most often to acetylcholine (ACh) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP). The latter noninvasive method directly images brachial artery responses to flow-mediated dilation (FMD) induced by a brief period of forearm ischemia and to sublingual GTN administration. In measuring total flow to the forearm, strain gauge plethysmography provides an assessment of resistance vessel function (37), whereas the ultrasound technique directly images larger conduit arteries. Few studies have directly compared conduit and resistance vessel function within individuals (10, 16, 24), and none has assessed whether changes in resistance vessel function relate to changes in conduit vessel function in response to an intervention. We have therefore pooled data from our laboratory's exercise training studies involving subjects with cardiovascular disease or risk factors (26, 42, 43) to examine the hypothesis that exercise training-induced improvements in conduit vessel function are related to changes in resistance vessel function.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-blocking therapy, five took an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, two took a proton pump inhibitor, and one each took a diuretic, a calcium channel-blocking drug, and cholestyramine. All but one of the Type 2 diabetic subjects (T2D; n = 15) were taking oral hypoglycemic medication, five were taking an ACE inhibitor, two were on statin therapy, and two were taking aspirin. None had evidence of micro- or macrovascular disease. For all subjects taking medication, treatment did not alter throughout the study period. All subjects were recruited from hospital clinics or via public advertisement.
|
Study design. Study designs and assessment techniques for each group are described in individual papers and were almost identical (12, 26, 42, 43). After preliminary screening and baseline assessments, subjects were randomly assigned to remain sedentary or perform exercise training for 8-wk periods, followed by crossover. The exercise training protocol and assessment procedures are outlined below. Subjects were requested to make no changes to their diet, therapy, or other routines for the duration of the study. Interventions commenced within 7 days of the completion of baseline assessments, and all repeat assessments, including resistance and conduit vessel function, were performed within 7 days of the cessation of exercise training or control periods.
Assessment of vascular function. Vascular function assessments were conducted in a quiet, temperature-controlled environment, at separate attendances for conduit and resistance vessel function. Repeat investigations were performed at the same time of day for individual subjects. Subjects fasted for 8 h, abstained from alcohol and caffeine for 12 h, and did not perform any exercise for 24 h before assessments.
Assessment of conduit vessel function.
With the subject resting supine, the nondominant arm was extended and immobilized with foam supports and positioned at an angle of
80° from the torso. Heart rate was continuously monitored with a three-lead electrocardiograph, and mean arterial pressure was determined from an automated sphygmomanometer (Dinamap 8100, Critikon, Tampa, FL) on the contralateral arm. Resting heart rate and blood pressure measures were recorded after 30 min of supine rest in all subjects.
A rapid inflation and deflation pneumatic cuff was then positioned on the imaged arm immediately distal to the olecranon process to provide a stimulus to forearm ischemia (6). A 10-MHz multifrequency linear array probe attached to a high-resolution ultrasound machine (Aspen, Acuson, Mountain View, CA) was used to image the brachial artery in the distal one-third of the upper arm. When an optimal image was attained, the probe was held stable in a stereotactic clamp. Ultrasound parameters were set to optimize longitudinal, B-mode images of the lumen-arterial wall interface.
After 20 min of rest, baseline images were recorded on a S-VHS video cassette recorder (SVO-9500 MDP, Sony, Tokyo, Japan) over 2 min. The forearm cuff was then inflated to 200 mmHg for 5 min. Images were recorded 30 s before cuff deflation and for 2 min after deflation. After 10 min of rest, to allow arterial diameter to return to baseline, another 2-min baseline recording was made before a sublingual 400-µg spray dose of GTN with images recorded for a further 5 min.
Brachial artery diameters were analyzed by using custom-designed edge-detection and wall-tracking software, which minimizes investigator bias and has the power to detect an absolute change in FMD of 2% in a crossover design study with only six subjects (45). Briefly, an edge-detection algorithm averages >300 diameter measurements per frame, with 2030 frames assessed per second. Those average diameter measures that coincide with the ECG R wave (also autodetected), that is, occurring at end diastole, were subsequently analyzed by using a third-order polynomial curve (45). FMD and GTN responses were then calculated from the peak value derived from this polynomial curve and related to the average of all R-wave-gated diameters collected during the baseline period preceding either the FMD or GTN manipulations. The mean intraobserver coefficient of variation of repeated measures of FMD using this software is 6.7%, which is significantly lower than that for traditional manual methods (45).
Assessment of resistance vessel function. While the subjects were lying supine, a 20-gauge cannula (Arrow, Reading, PA) was inserted into the brachial artery of the nondominant arm, under local anesthesia with <2 ml of 1% lignocaine, to infuse vasoactive agents and sterile saline, and for blood sampling and measurement of intra-arterial pressure. Subjects were then positioned with elbows at heart level and hands at a comfortable height to allow forearm venous drainage. Pneumatic cuffs (SC10 and SC5, D. E. Hokanson, Bellevue, WA) and strain gauges (SG 24, Medasonics, Fremont, CA) were positioned for forearm blood flow (FBF) measurements. Wrist and upper arm cuffs were connected to rapid inflation devices (E-20 and AG 101, Hokanson); strain gauges were positioned 810 cm distal to the olecranon process of each arm. Strain gauge placement and hand and elbow elevation were the same for repeat tests. An online microcomputer (SPG 16, Medasonics) sampled amplified output from the strain-gauges at 75 Hz, which was displayed in real time. A software program controlled cuff inflation and deflation as well as data acquisition, storage, and display to ensure blood flow measurements were synchronized with upper arm cuff inflation.
Arterial pressure was monitored continuously with a Hewlett-Packard monitoring system (model 78353A). ACh (Miochol, Ciba Vision, New South Wales, Australia) was infused at 10, 20, and 40 µg/min, each for 3 min, and SNP (David Bull Laboratories, Victoria, Australia) was infused at 2, 4, and 8 µg/min, each for 3 min by using a constant-rate infusion pump (model 770, IVAC). All solutions were prepared aseptically immediately before infusion.
The study protocol was identical for each subject. Baseline measurements were made 20 min after cannulation. Blood flow measurements were made after inflation of the wrist cuffs to 200 mmHg, to exclude the hands from the circulation, and by rapidly inflating the upper arm cuffs to 45 mmHg, to occlude venous flow, for 10 s out of every 15 s during baseline and drug infusion periods. For each data collection period, the last five measurements of FBF were averaged to give a representative flow for that period. There was a minimum of 10 min of rest between ACh and SNP infusions.
Exercise training protocol. Subjects performed three sessions of exercise per week consisted of of either three supervised combined aerobic and resistance circuit training sessions or two supervised circuit training sessions in addition to one home exercise training session per week, monitored for compliance (CAD, UTHC, THC). Circuit training sessions were performed at the Cardiac Gymnasium, Royal Perth Hospital, with the focus on the large muscles of the lower limbs. Upper body exercises did not involve the forearm, and the subjects were instructed to avoid hand gripping. They were also instructed on correct lifting techniques to avoid the Valsalva maneuver.
The 8-wk "circuit" training protocol involved a combination of resistance training, cycle ergometry, and treadmill walking. The resistance exercises (listed above) were alternated with cycle stations at a work-to-rest ratio of 45:15 s. Subjects performed one lift every 3 s, completing 15 lifts in the 45-s work period. At completion of the circuit, subjects performed an additional 5 min of treadmill walking. Training intensity and duration were progressively increased during the first 23 wk, as tolerated. Resistance intensity commenced at 55% of pretraining one repetition maximum and increased to 65% at week 4. Cycling and treadmill walking intensities were initially 70% of peak heart rate, determined from a prestudy graded maximal exercise test, and were increased up to 85% of peak heart rate at week 6.
Home training sessions, where performed, were individually prescribed and involved subjects performing continuous aerobic exercise at 7085% of peak heart rate for up to 4560 min. To ensure compliance, sessions were recorded in a diary, and heart rates were recorded by using heart rate monitors (Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland).
Analysis of data. In plethysmographic resistance vessel function studies, FBF responses were initially calculated as a ratio of that in the infused arm to that in the noninfused arm, changes in the ratio being expressed as percent changes from the baseline immediately preceding the drug infusion period (2). FBF results to each drug infusion were then expressed as the area under the curve (AUC) of percent changes in FBF ratio responses to the three doses of the drug. To compare trained and untrained data for all variables, including conduit and resistance vessel responses, Student's paired t-test or two-way ANOVA were used. To examine relationships between variables at baseline (i.e., pretraining), we calculated Pearson correlation coefficients between all variables and baseline FMD, GTN, ACh AUC, and SNP AUC, thereby providing correlation coefficients and associated significance levels. Relationships between FMD and ACh and between GTN and SNP were specifically determined. Descriptive data at baseline are reported as means ± SD and other data as means ± SE or, for log-transformed data, as geometric mean and 95% confidence limits. Significance was set at P < 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Relationship between variables before training. Subject characteristics for each group studied are displayed in Table 1. When data from each of the groups were pooled before training, FMD was not significantly correlated with the FBF response to ACh, expressed as area under the dose-response curve (ACh AUC) (r = 0.186, P = 0.231; Fig. 1) or as the effect of the maximum dose (40 µg/min) of ACh (r = 0.082, P = 0.602). Indeed, there were no correlations within subgroups between FMD and ACh AUC (UTHC: r = 0.042 P = 0.908; THC: r = 0.184 P = 0.611; CAD r = 0.370, P = 0.376; T2D: r = 0.353, P = 0.197). There was also no significant correlation between GTN and response to SNP expressed as AUC (r = 0.010, P = 0.951; Fig. 1) or as the highest dose (8 µg/min) (r = 0.023; P = 0.884) and no significant correlations within groups.
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although this is the first study to report relationships between changes in conduit and resistance vessel function induced by an intervention within subjects, a small number of previous studies have compared strain gauge- and ultrasound-derived measures of resistance and conduit vessel function in humans. Irace et al. (16) reported a significant correlation between FMD and ACh dose-response curves (r = 0.739, P < 0.001) in a study of 10 healthy subjects and 6 patients with obesity or hypertension. Somewhat in contrast, Lind et al. (24) found no correlation between brachial FMD and the FBF response to a single dose of the muscarinic agonist methacholine in 16 patients with cardiovascular disease and 10 healthy controls (methacholine vs. FMD, r = 0.03), whereas, surprisingly, a highly significant relationship between SNP and GTN responses was reported (r = 0.70, P < 0.01). They concluded that differences in the relative contribution of nitric oxide (NO) to the vasodilation mediated by FMD and methacholine, and the variable contribution of other vasodilators to responses mediated by these stimuli, may have accounted for the lack of association observed. Finally, Eskurza et al. (10), in a study of 44 healthy subjects aged 2079 yr, reported no relationship between FMD and the peak vasodilator response to ACh (r = 0.13, P = 0.51), a finding similar to that observed in the present study (r = 0.041; P = 0.79). On the whole, we suggest that the above data, and our present finding of independent changes in vascular function in response to exercise training according to vascular territory, do not support the suggestion that noninvasive conduit vessel measurement can serve as a surrogate for global assessment of endothelial function in vivo (10).
Several explanations exist for the lack of association between conduit and resistance vessel responses observed to exercise training in the present study. Eskurza et al. (10) propose that because the response to ACh is only partially NO dependent (30), whereas FMD responses to ischemic stimuli similar to that used in the present study are largely due to NO release (8, 18), differences in the corelease of alternate vasodilators may explain the lack of association between ACh and FMD responses. This does not, however, account for the absence of correlation between endothelium-independent dilators in the present study, the response to which is entirely NO dependent. A second possibility relates to the difference in measurement techniques. Plethysmography, the traditionally accepted method for assessment of peripheral blood flow in humans is, however, difficult to validate because derivation of absolute flows necessitates assumptions relating to the consistency of the geometric shape, proportional swelling, and the tissue composition of the forearm along its length. Ultrasonographic measurement of arterial diameter, in contrast, is relatively easy to validate by using phantom arteries, and our laboratory has previously undertaken a comprehensive assessment of the accuracy and reproducibility of our methodology, including automated edge-detection and wall tracking software, which indicates that the resolving power of the system approximates 8 µm (45). Given that exercise training was associated with improvement in both plethysmographic ACh responses and ultrasound FMD assessments in the present study, the lack of association between these changes appears unlikely to be due to differences in measurement techniques.
Finally, the lack of association between resistance and conduit vessel responses in the present study may relate to differences in the physiological mechanisms responsible for exercise training-induced changes in different vascular territories. It is well established that shear stress plays an important role in exercise training-induced changes in vascular endothelial function (29), a conclusion recently endorsed by an elegant in vivo study in patients with coronary disease (15). Given that acute bouts of exercise induce changes in local hemodynamic conditions and shear stress that differ according to branch order of the vascular tree, it is likely that the contribution of this, and other mechanisms responsible for vascular adaptations, differ at distinct loci. Indeed, it has been suggested that exercise training induces structural enlargement of conduit vessels (arteriogenesis) that is dependent on shear stress-mediated NO release and may be an adaptive response that acts to mitigate the increases in transmural pressure and wall stress brought about by repeated exercise bouts (13, 20, 25, 34, 35, 39, 46). In contrast, microvascular angiogenesis, although endothelium (and vascular endothelial growth factor) dependent, appears to occur primarily in responses to hypoxia rather than shear stress, and NO is not obligatory (25, 34). In addition, evidence is emerging that the contribution of substances such as NO to exercise training-mediated adaptations in vascular structure and function may be vessel caliber dependent, with larger vessels that are exposed to higher shear stress forces possessing greater capacity for NO production (22, 23). Interestingly, given NO is an antiatherogenic molecule, it has long been known that regions of low shear are predisposed to advanced lesion formation (29). Thus the most likely explanations for the lack of association between resistance and conduit vessel responses in the present study probably relate to the likelihood that distinct physiological mechanisms are involved in the modulation of resistance and conduit function in response to exercise training and that, furthermore, the plethysmographic and ultrasound methods interrogate different effector pathways in the vessel wall.
There are several potential limitations of the present study. The subjects studied exhibited a heterogeneous cross section of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, although medications were not altered in any subject across the period of study. In studies using correlation analysis, it might be argued that detection of relationships is more likely when a wide variation exists in baseline characteristics. Another possible limitation relates to the power of the study. With 43 subjects, power analysis indicates that, assuming a two-tailed 5% test, this number was sufficient to detect a significant correlation of 0.4 with 80% power (19). It is notable that previous studies that have reported significant correlations between conduit and resistance vessel function (16, 24) have both studied 16 patients, whereas the present study (n = 43) and that of Eskurza et al. (10) (n = 44) were undertaken in larger cohorts. There is of course a tendency for correlations to be biased by outlying data in studies of smaller sample size. It is also possible that a longer period of training or a different training protocol may have revealed significant correlations, particularly if the time course and magnitude of adaptations differs between vessel beds. This is an interesting hypothesis that deserves further investigation, but both conduit and resistance vessel endothelium-dependent function significantly improved in the present study despite the absence of correlation between these changes. Finally, we did not study normal healthy subjects, and our conclusions are limited to subjects with cardiovascular disease in whom endothelial function improved with training.
In summary, no association was observed between the commonly used methods of strain gauge plethysmography and high resolution ultrasound in the present study, and we have shown for the first time that changes in conduit and resistance vessel function in response to exercise training are not correlated. These data add further support to the evolving hypothesis that the mechanisms responsible for exercise training-induced adaptations in the vasculature differ according to the vascular territories involved.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Fisslthaler and I. Fleming Activation and Signaling by the AMP-Activated Protein Kinase in Endothelial Cells Circ. Res., July 17, 2009; 105(2): 114 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. Minson and D. J. Green Measures of vascular reactivity: prognostic crystal ball or Pandora's box? J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2008; 105(2): 398 - 399. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Okamoto, M. Masuhara, and K. Ikuta Combined aerobic and resistance training and vascular function: effect of aerobic exercise before and after resistance training J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2007; 103(5): 1655 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. De Filippis, K. Cusi, G. Ocampo, R. Berria, S. Buck, A. Consoli, and L. J. Mandarino Exercise-Induced Improvement in Vasodilatory Function Accompanies Increased Insulin Sensitivity in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2006; 91(12): 4903 - 4910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Green, A. J. Maiorana, M. E. Tschakovsky, K. E. Pyke, C. J. Weisbrod, and G. O'Driscoll Relationship between changes in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation and basal release of nitric oxide in subjects with Type 2 diabetes Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): H1193 - H1199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Sackner, E. Gummels, and J. A. Adams Effect of Moderate-Intensity Exercise, Whole-Body Periodic Acceleration, and Passive Cycling on Nitric Oxide Release Into Circulation Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2794 - 2803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rakobowchuk, C. L. McGowan, P. C. de Groot, J. W. Hartman, S. M. Phillips, and M. J. MacDonald Endothelial function of young healthy males following whole body resistance training J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 2185 - 2190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. P. Bleeker, M. Kooijman, G. A. Rongen, M. T. E. Hopman, and P. Smits Preserved contribution of nitric oxide to baseline vascular tone in deconditioned human skeletal muscle J. Physiol., June 1, 2005; 565(2): 685 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J Green, A. Maiorana, G. O'Driscoll, and R. Taylor Effect of exercise training on endothelium-derived nitric oxide function in humans J. Physiol., November 15, 2004; 561(1): 1 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Sieck Commentary J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2004; 97(2): 748 - 748. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |