Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 97: 556-563, 2004. First published April 2, 2004; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00982.2003
8750-7587/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/2/556    most recent
00982.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McParland, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Black, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McParland, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Black, J. L.

Airway basement membrane perimeter in human airways is not a constant; potential implications for airway remodeling in asthma

Brent E. McParland,1 Peter D. Paré,2 Peter R. A. Johnson,1 Carol L. Armour,3 and Judith L. Black1

Departments of 1Pharmacology and 3Pharmacy, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia; and 2University of British Columbia, James Hogg iCAPTURE Centre for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6Z 1Y6

Submitted 11 September 2003 ; accepted in final form 29 March 2004


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Many studies that demonstrate an increase in airway smooth muscle in asthmatic patients rely on the assumption that bronchial internal perimeter (Pi) or basement membrane perimeter (Pbm) is a constant, i.e., not affected by fixation pressure or the degree of smooth muscle shortening. Because it is the basement membrane that has been purported to be the indistensible structure, this study examines the assumption that Pbm is not affected by fixation pressure. Pbm was determined for the same human airway segment (n = 12) fixed at distending pressures of 0 cmH2O and 21 cmH2O in the absence of smooth muscle tone. Pbm for the segment fixed at 0 cmH2O was determined morphometrically, and the Pbm for the same segment, had the segment been fixed at 21 cmH2O, was predicted from knowing the luminal volume and length of the airway when distended to 21 cmH2O (organ bath-derived Pi). To ensure an accurate transformation of the organ bath-derived Pi value to a morphometry-derived Pbm value, had the segment been fixed at 21 cmH2O, the relationship between organ bath-derived Pi and morphometry-derived Pbm was determined for five different bronchial segments distended to 21 cmH2O and fixed at 21 cmH2O (r2 = 0.99, P < 0.0001). Mean Pbm for bronchial segments fixed at 0 cmH2O was 9.4 ± 0.4 mm, whereas mean predicted Pbm, had the segments been fixed at 21 cmH2O, was 14.1 ± 0.5 mm (P < 0.0001). This indicates that Pbm is not a constant when isolated airway segments without smooth muscle tone are fixed distended to 21 cmH2O. The implication of these results is that the increase in smooth muscle mass in asthma may have been overestimated in some previous studies. Therefore, further studies are required to examine the potential artifact using whole lungs with and without abolition of airway smooth muscle tone and/or inflation.

bronchial hyperreactivity; pathology; smooth muscle; morphometry


IT IS GENERALLY ACCEPTED that airway smooth muscle (ASM) mass is increased in asthma (2, 3, 68, 10, 12, 16, 18, 2729), and it has been suggested that the increase in muscle mass may play a pivotal role in causing exaggerated airway narrowing, which is a characteristic feature of asthma (19). Early studies showing that ASM mass was increased in asthma were criticized on the basis that the comparisons may have been between airways with different internal diameters (6, 16). In the cardiovascular field, this selection bias was overcome by normalizing the cross-sectional area of vascular wall structures to the internal elastic lamina, which was found to be a constant over a wide range of physiological pressures (4). This observation was also found to be valid for the internal perimeter (Pi) of guinea pig airways (15), and in both guinea pig and human airways Pi appeared constant in the face of substantial ASM shortening, i.e., the airway mucosa folded rather than narrowed concentrically at low distending pressures and during ASM contraction (14). These observations led to several studies in which airway wall-compartment dimensions were normalized to Pi or basement membrane perimeter (Pbm) (2, 3, 7, 8, 16, 18, 27), and the results confirmed previous findings that ASM, submucosal, and adventitial areas are increased in asthma.

In an airway cut in cross section, the Pi follows the luminal surface of the epithelium, and Pbm follows the basement membrane that subtends the epithelium. Therefore, the difference in length for the two measurements depends on the cross-sectional area of the epithelium. In the present study, we reexamined the assumption that Pi and Pbm are constant over a range of distending pressures used to fix human bronchi. Both measurements were chosen because, although it is the basement membrane layer that has been purported to be the indistensible structure in the face of substantial airway narrowing or distension (15), historically it was the Pi that was alleged to be a constant (14). In most previous studies (2, 3, 68, 10, 16, 18, 28, 29), comparison of airway dimensions have been made on lungs obtained at postmortem, which for nondiseased lungs were usually fixed by inflating with formalin until the lung was fully distended (inflation pressure of 20–30 cmH2O). Asthmatic lungs, on the other hand, are often fixed without inflation. If Pi and Pbm increase as a result of fixing lungs inflated, then normalized airway wall-compartment areas, including ASM area (WAm), will appear decreased in nondiseased airways relative to asthmatic airways. In addition, lengthening of the airway during pressure fixation will further reduce the apparent wall area. Even when asthmatic lungs are fixed by inflation, it is likely that increased stiffness of the airways due to a thickened reticular layer, increased extracellular matrix, and increased ASM tone, especially in patients who die in status asthmaticus, would decrease the degree of airway distension relative to that for nondiseased lungs.

Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that, in human isolated airway segments, without smooth muscle tone, the Pbm is increased if airways are fixed inflated at 21 cmH2O compared with airways fixed without inflation (~0 cmH2O). To test this hypothesis, we studied human bronchial segments predominantly from nonasthmatic subjects obtained at the time of surgical resection.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Summary of the theoretical basis used for experimental methodology.   It is not possible to obtain a measurement of Pbm at two different fixation pressures for the same airway. One way around this problem would be to compare the Pbm of airways fixed at 21 cmH2O with airways fixed at 0 cmH2O, which are represented by airways A' and B', respectively, in Fig. 1. Such a study, however, could then be criticized on the basis that the comparison between the two groups was made between airways that could have had different Pbm at 0 cmH2O. The present study uniquely addresses this problem by predicting the Pbm of the airways fixed at 0 cmH2O (airway B') had they been fixed at 21 cmH2O (airway B"). Due to the complexity of the methodology used, the three critical steps required to determine the predicted Pbm, had the segments been fixed at 21 cmH2O, have been outlined below.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Flow schematic of the experimental protocol, which shows representative airway cross sections and the critical steps required to determine the predicted basement membrane perimeter (Pbm) in airways had they been fixed inflated at 21 cmH2O (B") instead of without inflation at 0 cmH2O (B'). Organ bath internal perimeter (Pi) was determined from knowledge of the luminal volume and length of a bronchial segment inflated to 21 cmH2O in the organ bath (A and B); morphometry Pbm was determined from taking measurements from fixed serial sections for airways fixed inflated at 21 cmH2O (A') and without inflation at 0 cmH2O (B'); predicted morphometry Pbm (B") if segments fixed without inflation at 0 cmH2O were fixed inflated at 21 cmH2O was determined from knowledge of the relationship between organ bath Pi (A) and morphometry Pbm (A') for bronchial segments fixed at 21 cmH2O. Circumferential strain of the basement membrane was measured as the difference in the predicted morphometry Pbm at 21 cmH2O and measured morphometry Pbm at 0 cmH2O for the same airway. It is important to note that calculated strain is the result of differences in Pbm after fixation without inflation at 0 cmH2O and with inflation at 21 cmH2O and, therefore, is a measurement of apparent strain, which may not accurately reflect true mechanical strain.

 
The first step is to measure the volume and length of all segments at 21 cmH2O in an organ bath and calculate the average Pi of the preparations (A and B, Fig. 1) assuming the luminal geometry to be a cylinder.

The second step is to establish the relationship between the Pi calculated from the volumetric measurement (A, Fig. 1) at 21 cmH2O and the Pbm measured morphometrically (A', Fig. 1) on airways fixed at 21 cmH2O. This was done to predict the theoretical Pbm (B", Fig. 1), if the airways that were fixed at 0 cmH2O were fixed at 21 cmH2O, based on their volumetrically determined Pi at 21 cmH2O (B, Fig. 1).

The third step is to compare the predicted Pbm at 21 cmH2O (B", Fig. 1) to the measured Pbm at 0 cmH2O (B', Fig. 1). The difference in fixation length has been reported as apparent strain.

Lung collection and preparation of human bronchial segments.   Human lung was obtained from patients undergoing surgical resection for either carcinoma or lung transplantation. Collection of lung and use of lung specimens was approved by the Human Ethics Committee at the University of Sydney. Hospital pathologists examined all surgical specimens macroscopically to ensure that the bronchial segments that were studied were not invaded by carcinoma. Tissue was immediately transported to the laboratory in ice-cold carbogenated (5% CO2 in oxygen) Krebs-Henseleit solution [composition (in mM): 118 NaCl, 4.7 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.2 MgSO4, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 25.5 NaHCO3, 11.1 D-glucose].

For measurement of Pbm and Pi, a total of 18 bronchial segments from 14 patients with a variety of disease conditions were prepared using a method described for canine lung (22). Briefly, bronchi were dissected free of the surrounding parenchyma, and bifurcations were tied off as close to the main stem bronchus as possible to produce a bronchial segment (1.4–2.4 cm long, 3–6 mm mean internal diameter at 7 cmH2O transmural pressure) that was "fluid tight" throughout its length. Bronchial segments were attached to organ bath adapters, placed into a 50-ml horizontal organ bath (Respiratory Research Group, Sydney, Australia), stretched to 120% of resting axial length to minimize further lengthwise stretching, and set at a transmural distending pressure of 7 cmH2O. The bronchial segments were bathed in, and perfused by, Krebs-Henseleit solution maintained at 37°C and continually gassed with 5% CO2 in oxygen to maintain a pH of 7.35. Segments were equilibrated for 90 min, during which the bathing fluid on the inside and outside of the bronchial segment was exchanged at intervals of 15 min.

Organ bath derived luminal volume and calculated Pi.   After the equilibration period, isoproterenol (100 µM, Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) was added to the organ bath to fully relax bronchial segments (9). After complete relaxation, the luminal volume of the bronchial segment at transmural pressures of 7 and 21 cmH2O was estimated by measuring the volume of luminal fluid that was expelled to a column by applying a positive pressure (~50 cmH2O) to the outside of the bronchial segment (23). In the absence of ASM tone, the transverse cross-sectional profiles of the bronchial segment at 7 and 21 cmH2O were assumed to be represented by a circle. The average Pi was calculated from knowledge of the length (L; in cm) and volume (V; in ml) of the segment (Eq. 1). The length of the preparation was measured with a Vernier caliper as the distance between the ends of the two adapters, which only included the compressible section of the airway segment

(1)

Morphometry measurements.   On completion of the organ bath estimate of Pi, 13 tissues from 9 patients were fixed without inflation by placing the tissues directly into neutral-buffered, 10% formalin (transmural pressure {approx} 0 cmH2O) for not less than 48 h before tissue processing. These preparations were also allowed to assume an unstressed length (no axial strain). Five bronchial segments from five patients were fixed by inflation (21 cmH2O) at a length of 120% unstressed length (axial strain). The fixed bronchial segments were embedded in paraffin wax, 6-µm cross sections were cut serially at 0.8-mm intervals down the entire length, and sections were expanded by floating on water at 45°C before adhering to slides. Sections were stained with Gomori elastin trichrome stain (Probing and Structure, Queensland, Australia). All nomenclature for the airway dimensions and areas were as proposed by Bai et al. (1). Measurements of perimeter were taken for all sections, whereas four sections equally spaced down the length of the segment were used for measuring WAm, epithelial layer thickness, and subepithelial layer thickness. The following perimeter measurements were taken: outer airway wall, cartilage, Pbm, and Pi. The total wall area (WAt) was derived by subtracting the area subtended by Pi from the area subtended by outer airway wall perimeter. Point counting was used to estimate the mean WAm. Epithelial layer thickness and subepithelial layer thickness were quantified by tracing the entire perimeter of the epithelial layer from images captured at a magnification of x400. For each airway section, three fields of view were chosen, which were based on clock positions 4, 9, and 12. By knowing the perimeter (P) and the area (A), the thickness (T) was determined by solving a quadratic expression T = [P – (P2 – 16A)0.5]/4. Epithelial wall area was derived by multiplying the average thickness for each section by the Pi. Measurements of length and area were multiplied by estimated shrinkage factors of 1.11 and 1.21, respectively (5).

Sample calculation for determining organ bath Pi, morphometry Pbm, and apparent strain.   The following is an example of the calculations performed to determine the predicted morphometry-derived Pbm for one bronchial segment had it been fixed distended to 21 cmH2O instead of 0 cmH2O. Luminal volume (113 µl) and length (14.2 mm) gave an organ bath-derived Pi of 10.0 mm (Eq. 1). Pbm derived from morphometry in the same specimen fixed at 0 cmH2O was 6.5 mm. The organ bath Pi at 21 cmH2O was then used to determine a predicted morphometry-derived Pbm value if the segment had been fixed at 21 cmH2O. To make this adjustment, bronchial segments fixed while distended to 21 cmH2O were used to derive the linear regression equation between the organ bath-derived Pi values at 21 cmH2O and the morphometry-derived Pbm values. The equation for morphometry-derived Pbm was 1.37·organ bath-derived Pi – 2.3 (R2 = 0.99). When this equation was used for this example, the Pbm, had the segment been fixed at 21 cmH2O, was equal to 11.4 mm = 1.37·10.0 mm – 2.3 mm. This gives a fixation-induced apparent strain value for Pbm equal to 0.75 = (11.4 – 6.5)/6.5. In additional analyses, both the contribution to the luminal volume made by bifurcations down the length of the airway segment and the effect of cone geometry rather than cylinder geometry were factored into the measurement of mean Pbm and strain. The inclusions of these parameters had no significant effect on the final measurement of strain (data not shown).

Examining a possible source for the underestimation of organ bath-derived Pi.   The organ bath-derived Pi value underestimated the morphometry-derived Pbm value (Fig. 3). The reason for the discrepancy is apparent by observation of the sections fixed at 21 cmH2O (Fig. 2): the cross-sectional areas of the airway lumen are not perfectly circular. To compensate for this, a post hoc adjustment of the organ bath-derived Pi (adjPi) was performed for bronchial segments fixed at 21 cmH2O using

(2)
where morphometryPbm is the morphometry-derived Pbm, PAbm is a theoretical perimeter derived from knowing the area enclosed by morphometryPbm if that area was circular, the ratio of morphometryPbm/PAbm represents the circularity factor, and organ bathPi is the organ bath-derived Pi.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Scatter plots showing the relationship between organ bath-derived Pi and morphometry-derived Pbm for individual segments fixed at 0 cmH2O ({circ}; n = 12 airways from 8 patients) and 21 cmH2O ({blacksquare}; n = 5 airways from 5 patients). The line of unity (broken line) is shown for reference, and the linear regression line (solid line) is shown for segments fixed at 21 cmH2O without an adjustment for noncircularity [r = 0.99, P < 0.0001; morphometry Pbm = 1.37(organ bath Pi) – 2.3]. Also shown, for an individual airway segment fixed at 0 cmH2O, is an example of how the organ bath-derived Pi value was converted to a morphometry-derived Pbm if the airway segment had been fixed at 21 cmH2O. For the example shown, basement membrane strain at 21 cmH2O was estimated to be 75%.

 


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Serial images from 2 human airway segments that had similar organ bath-derived Pi (only every second serial section shown) but very different morphometry-derived Pbm. Top: airway was fixed without inflation (0 cmH2O), which mimics the method of fixation for asthmatic airways. Bottom: airway was fixed inflated using a transmural pressure of 21 cmH2O, which mimics the method of fixation that is commonly used for "normal" airways. The scale (5 mm) for both airways is the same. Note that the luminal area was not a perfect circle for sections from airways fixed at 21 cmH2O. This distortion may either be caused by compression during sectioning or be due to the presence of bifurcations.

 
Pressure-volume curves with and without smooth muscle tone.   To test for a possible effect of intrinsic ASM tone on Pi, 10 additional segments from 9 different patients were studied. Pressure-volume points were obtained (0, 3, 7, 11, 16, and 21 cmH2O) in the presence of intrinsic ASM tone and after maximal ASM relaxation, which was achieved by adding isoproterenol (100 µM). Volume at each transmural pressure was determined by applying an external pressure of 50 cmH2O to the outside of the bronchial segment as described above. If length is assumed to be a constant with respect to inflation, then the relative values for volume, as a percent of maximum, would be the same as cross-sectional area. This is possible because the airway segments were lengthened by 20% (axially strained) of the unstressed length before inflation.

Analysis of data.   Unless otherwise stated, nontransformed data are expressed as means ± SE. Area data were transformed by taking the square root so as to establish a linear relationship with Pbm. Mean and 95% confidence intervals were used for these data. Comparisons of morphometric measurements obtained from bronchi fixed without inflation ({approx}0 cmH2O) and with inflation (21 cmH2O) were performed using ANOVA and Fisher's protected least-squares difference test to detect significant differences, defined as P ≤ 0.05. Paired t-tests were used to compare morphometry and predicted Pi in specimens fixed at 0 and 21 cmH2O. Least-squares regression analysis based on measured and calculated values from segments fixed at 21 cmH2O were used to derive the predicted morphometry-derived Pbm values at 7 and 21 cmH2O for airways fixed at 0 cmH2O. The program Microsoft Excel 2002 was used for data management, and all statistics were performed using Statview (version 5.01).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Patient data.

Twenty-eight bronchial segments were used in this study. Of these, 13 were fixed by passive perfusion ({approx}0 cmH2O), 5 were fixed with pressure (21 cmH2O), and the other 10 (9 patients) were used for pressure-volume curves and were not fixed. Of the 13 bronchial segments fixed at 0 cmH2O, 8 paired segments were obtained from four patients and the remaining 5 were from five different patients. One of the 13 tissues studied was considered to be an outlier, because the degree of Pbm strain (132%) was >2 standard deviations from the mean, suggesting the possibility of a measurement error. Therefore, to minimize bias, this tissue was removed from the experimental analysis. Bronchial segments fixed with pressure (21 cmH2O) were all from different patients. The bronchial segments were obtained from patients who had a range of conditions and operative procedures. The mean patient age for patients whose bronchial segments were fixed at 0 cmH2O (47 ± 6 yr) was not different from those whose segments were fixed at 21 cmH2O (53 ± 10 yr).

Organ bath-derived luminal volume and Pi.

There was no significant difference in luminal volume at 21 cmH2O [209 µl (95% confidence interval: 183–237 µl) vs. 203 µl (95% confidence interval: 124–300 µl)], length (1.9 ± 0.1 vs. 2.1 ± 0.2 cm), or the raw organ bath-derived Pi (11.9 ± 0.3 vs. 11.0 ± 0.8 mm) between the bronchial segments fixed at 0 and 21 cmH2O, respectively. Individual values for organ bath-derived Pi are shown in Tables 1 and 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Morphometry-derived, organ bath-derived, and predicted results for Pbm and Pi at 21 cmH2O from each bronchial segment fixed at 21 cmH2O

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Morphometry-derived, O-Bath derived, and predicted values for Pbm and Pi at 0, 7, and 21 cmH2O from each bronchial segment fixed at 0 cmH2O

 
Morphometry-derived Pbm and Pi.

The appearance of sections from bronchial segments fixed at 21 cmH2O was very different from those fixed at 0 cmH2O (Fig. 2). Even in the absence of smooth muscle tone, mucosal folding was apparent in sections from bronchial segments fixed at 0 cmH2O but not in those fixed at 21 cmH2O, and the airway wall appeared much thicker in segments fixed at 0 cmH2O. The luminal area within the cross sections of airways fixed at 21 cmH2O was not always a perfect circle, as was assumed. After tissue processing, the measured length of bronchial segments fixed at 21 cmH2O was 41% greater than that of segments fixed at 0 cmH2O. Given that there was no shrinkage of axial length for segments fixed at 21 cmH2O, tissues fixed at 0 cmH2O were ~85% of the length before fixation, i.e., the length before the segments were mounted into the organ bath.

Results for individual segments fixed at 21 and 0 cmH2O are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively, and the correlations between organ bath-derived Pi and morphometry-derived Pbm are shown in Fig. 3. Morphometry-derived Pbm was significantly longer (12.8 ± 1.1 mm) for segments fixed at 21 cmH2O (n = 5 segments) than segments fixed without pressure (9.4 ± 0.4 mm, P < 0.01; n = 12 segments from 8 patients).

For bronchial segments fixed at 21 cmH2O in the organ bath, Pi (Eq. 1) was highly correlated with the morphometry Pbm [Pbm = 1.37·organ-bath Pi (in mm) – 2.3; R2 = 0.997, P < 0.0001; Fig. 3]. By incorporating the mean circularity factor (1.16 ± 0.02; range: 1.10–1.25) the difference between organ-bath Pi and morphometry Pi was largely accounted for (Pbm = 1.00Pi; R2 = 0.96). A paired t-test indicated no significant difference between morphometry-derived Pi (12.7 ± 1.1 mm) and organ bath-derived Pi that was corrected for deviations in cross-sectional circularity (corrected Pi: 12.8 ± 1.1 mm). Because morphometry Pbm and organ-bath Pi at 21 cmH2O were highly correlated (R2 = 0.99), organ-bath Pi for bronchial segments fixed at 0 cmH2O could be accurately converted to give predicted Pbm morphometry values if the segments had been fixed at 21 cmH2O (Table 2). Predicted values for Pbm and Pi were determined at 7 and 21 cmH2O. It was assumed that the deviation from circularity was the same at 7 and 21 cmH2O. The average apparent strain of the basement membrane for airways fixed at 7 and 21 cmH2O are shown in Fig. 4, and the relationship between pressure and strain was linear over the pressure range studied. The mean Pbm strain at 7 and 21 cmH2O was 20 ± 6 and 52 ± 6%, respectively (Fig. 4). The mean between-patient coefficient of variation for strain at 21 cmH2O was 42% (n = 8 patients), and the mean within-patient coefficient of variation was 13 ± 3% (n = 4 pairs of bronchi from 4 patients).



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Mean apparent strain (n = 12 airways from 8 patients) for Pbm after fixation at pressures of 0, 7, and 21 cmH2O. The apparent basement membrane strain if the tissues were fixed at 7 and 21 cmH2O was determined from predicted Pbm values (Table 2) based on the best-fit equation of organ bath-derived Pi at 21 cmH2O vs. morphometry-derived Pbm for bronchial segments fixed at 21 cmH2O (see Fig. 3). Basement membrane strain was significant if tissues were fixed at 7 and 21 cmH2O, and the relationship between pressure and strain was linear over the pressure range studied (broken line).

 
The mean three-point pressure-volume curve derived for the tissues used for morphometry was not significantly different from the more complete curve obtained from 10 different isoproterenol-relaxed tissues (Fig. 5). It is apparent that the pressure-volume relationship of the relaxed preparations is biphasic: a steeper relatively linear slope between 0 and 7 cmH2O and a separate flatter relatively linear relationship between 7 and 21 cmH2O. The inflexion point on the pressure-volume curve was determined to occur at ~7 cmH2O. The pressure-volume curve in the presence of intrinsic ASM tone is relatively linear over the entire range of pressures, and the mean segment volume at 21 cmH2O is approximately equal to the volume of the relaxed preparations at 7 cmH2O.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Mean ± SD 3-point pressure-volume (P-V) curve (crosses, broken black line) derived for the tissues used for morphometry (n = 12 segments from 8 patients) and a more complete curve ({circ}, broken black line) obtained from 10 isoproterenol-relaxed tissues (9 patients). There was no significant difference between these curves. Also shown is the P-V relationship (±SD) in the presence of intrinsic airway smooth muscle tone ({bullet}, broken gray line), which is significantly different from the P-V relationship in the absence of smooth muscle tone at all pressures. The large standard deviations indicate intrinsic smooth muscle tone is highly variable between different tissues. Note the inflexion point on the P-V curve generated from airways without smooth muscle tone occurs at ~7 cmH2O. This point indicates a change in tissue stiffness, which we have interpreted as the point where the mucosal folds have flattened out. In the presence of smooth muscle tone, the inflexion point appears to occur at a much greater transmural pressure.

 
Quantification of bronchial wall compartments.

Table 3 shows the airway wall compartment areas (mm2) and the divided by Pbm for airways fixed at 0 and 21 cmH2O. Because the length of the preparations fixed at 0 cmH2O was ~70% of the organ-bath length when stretched axially to 120% of the unstressed length, one would have predicted a 43% increase in the area of the wall components if wall volume was conserved. This result is what was observed for epithelial wall area (P < 0.05) and WAm (P < 0.05; 1-tail t-test assuming WAm must necessarily decrease when the airway is axially strained). There was also significantly more muscle for segments fixed at 0 cmH2O than at 21 cmH2O when muscle area was expressed as /Pbm. However, WAt was not increased for airway segments fixed at 0 cmH2O, suggesting that there was a change in compartment volume with length change, i.e., the total volume of the wall decreased with a decrease in segment length. A consequence of this was that, when WAm was expressed as a percent of WAt, there was a significantly higher value at 0 cmH2O.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Mean values for wall area of bronchial wall compartments in segments fixed at 0 and 21 cmH2O

 
Based on these data, we calculated the magnitude of the potential error in the estimation of ASM volume between normal and asthmatic airways if we surmise that the asthmatic airways behaved like noninflated airways and the normal airways behaved as the inflated airways. If, in the present study, we had assumed that Pbm was a constant, then in the airways fixed at 0 cmH2O would be 1.71 times greater than in the airways fixed at 21 cmH2O. If this value is converted to WAm, then the increase would be 2.9 (1.72)-fold.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The results of this study indicate that airway Pi and Pbm do not remain constant for human in vitro bronchial segments in which the smooth muscle has been relaxed with isoproterenol. Pbm was observed to be ~52% greater in length for airways fixed inflated at 21 cmH2O [{approx}total lung capacity (TLC)] compared with airways fixed without inflation at 0 cmH2O. After tissue processing, the bronchial segments fixed inflated (21 cmH2O) were ~1.41 times longer and the cross-sectional WAm was correspondingly ~41% less than segments that were fixed at 0 cmH2O without lengthwise stretching. By combining the effect of fixation pressure on Pbm and the effect of lengthwise stretching on cross-sectional area, a processing artifact induced an apparent 2.9-fold increase in Pbm-normalized WAm for segments fixed at 0 cmH2O.

Postmortem lungs from asthmatics who die in status asthmaticus are often fixed without inflating the lung ({approx}0 cmH2O) (2, 68, 16, 27). On the other hand, nonasthmatic lungs obtained postmortem are usually fixed by inflating the lung (20–30 cmH2O). In some studies, asthmatic lungs are also fixed inflated (3, 28), but in these lungs severe mucous plugging and increased airway stiffness (high passive tone) may reduce the degree of bronchial distension.

In the present study, bronchial segments fixed without inflation ({approx}0 cmH2O) simulated the fixation process usually used for fixing constricted asthmatic lungs postmortem, i.e., by submersion perfusion. Bronchial segments fixed inflated (21 cmH2O) simulated the fixation process often used for inflating and fixing nonasthmatic lungs postmortem. Inflating the lung postmortem not only results in changes in airway diameter but also airway length. Hughes et al. (13) demonstrated that airway length and diameter increase proportionally when canine lung is inflated with air. Specifically, airway diameter increased ~67% and airway length by 60% when lungs were inflated from 0 to 30 cmH2O with air. Interestingly, canine airways dissected from the lung only extend 15% beyond their resting length when inflation pressure is increased from 0 to 30 cmH2O (20), which indicates that parenchymal inflation causes axial distension of the bronchi. In the present study, due to the fact that the airways were tethered at either end, bronchial segments were not able to increase in length without bowing outward in response to an increase in pressure, and the change in length caused by bowing of the tissue could not be easily measured. Therefore, to simulate the effect of inflation on airway length and to minimize bowing of the tissues, all tissues were prestretched axially to 120% of their nonstretched length before volumetric measurements and fixation at 21 cmH2O. The tissues fixed at 0 cmH2O transmural pressure were not stretched axially during fixation. The difference in postfixation lengths of the tissues, which were stretched, was not 20 but 41% because the tissues fixed without lengthwise distension were able to shrink lengthways during the fixation process, whereas tissues that were stretched were fixed while tethered at each end, which prevented lengthwise shrinkage. This difference in length is likely to be similar to the difference that would be expected if the length of airways were compared in noninflated and inflated postmortem lungs.

The calculations of the possible errors in the estimation of ASM percent that are made in this paper are based on the assumption that these values were similar in the airways fixed at 0 and 21 cmH2O. Clearly, some of the differences could be due to real differences in the two groups rather than the artifact of fixation. However, we believe this is unlikely, because the starting volumes, lengths, and organ bath-derived Pi at 21 cmH2O for segments fixed at 0 and 21 cmH2O were not significantly different from each other. Cross-sectional wall areas of the smooth muscle and epithelium were both ~41% greater in the airways that were fixed without lengthwise stretching, which corresponds to the ~41% difference in lengths after fixation. Unexpectedly, total wall cross-sectional area was not 41% less in the stretched airways but approximately the same as that found in airways fixed without lengthwise stretching. The lack of change is puzzling and means that total wall volume is greater at longer length. Because the calculated epithelial and ASM volumes did not change as a function of length, the change in volume with length was due solely to volume changes in the adventitial and submucosal compartments, which contain loose connective tissue. One explanation could be that the interstitial pressure in the tissue changed as a function of length in which it became more negative with stretch and vice versa. Therefore, when the preparations fixed at 0 cmH2O were allowed to shorten, the increase in interstitial pressure could have expelled water.

Whatever the mechanism, the change in WAt, without a change in WAm, caused a significant change in WAm expressed as a percent of WAt. If such an effect also occurs in lungs fixed with formalin, it could explain the finding of increased ASM percentage, which has been reported in asthmatic lungs by some authors (6, 28, 29). Therefore, the artifact associated with fixation of asthmatic and normal lungs at different pressures can contribute to an apparent increase in WAm not only when normalized to basement membrane length, but also when expressed as a percent of the airway wall.

In the present study, Pbm was 1.36-fold greater in airways fixed inflated (21 cmH2O; n = 5) compared with airways fixed without inflation (0 cmH2O; n = 12). This finding is consistent with the work of Okazawa et al. (24). These authors examined cross sections of rabbit airways fixed at a variety of transpulmonary pressures (–4 to 10 cmH2O) in a relaxed state and after maximal activation with nebulized and intravenous carbachol. They found that the reduction in lumen area of the relaxed airways between 10 and 2 cmH2O occurred with little mucosal folding, suggesting that there was strain of the basement membrane between these distending pressures. It was possible that this difference in Pbm found in the present study may have been attributed, in part, to a bias in tissue selection due to the small sample size and lack of controlled randomization. This bias was overcome in the present study by effectively measuring Pbm in the same airway fixed with and without inflation. It is of course not possible to make a direct measurement of Pbm obtained from the same tissue fixed at two different inflation pressures. This problem was addressed by comparing actual morphometric measurements of Pbm in an airway fixed without inflation with predicted measurements of Pbm if the same airway segment had been fixed inflated. We were able to predict the Pbm if the airway had been fixed at 21 cmH2O by knowledge of length and volume of the same airway distended to 21 cmH2O in an organ bath (organ-bath Pi). Preliminary experiments demonstrated that organ bath-derived Pi at 21 cmH2O was strongly predictive of morphometry-derived Pbm in airways fixed inflated at 21 cmH2O (r2 = 0.997, n = 5; Fig. 3). When predicted and morphometry values of Pbm from the same airway were compared, predicted Pbm if the airway had been fixed distended at 21 cmH2O was ~1.5-fold greater than morphometry Pbm in the airway fixed without inflation (0 cmH2O). This ~1.5-fold increase in Pbm is consistent with the 1.36-fold difference in Pbm of airways fixed inflated (n = 5) compared with airways fixed without inflation (n = 12). In this study, the fold difference in Pbm was referred to as apparent strain, since it was the result of a difference in length after fixation. The apparent strain does not necessarily equate to pure mechanical strain of the basement membrane when inflating the tissue to 21 cmH2O. Both greater shrinkage and an underestimation of Pbm in airways fixed without inflation would result in an increase in apparent strain. However, it must be kept in mind that the objective of this study was to investigate whether differences in fixation pressure would affect the measurement of Pbm and not whether inflating an airway can cause mechanical strain of the basement membrane.

This finding that Pbm is not a constant in the present study is contrary to the results of James et al. (15). The authors concluded that airway Pi is a constant, because the relationship between WAt and Pi of guinea pig airways from lungs fixed at 25, 50, and 100% of TLC and also at 25% TLC with bronchoconstriction remained nearly constant. This result suggested that Pi could be used to normalize and compare airway wall areas in asthmatic airways fixed at postmortem without pressure and nonasthmatic airways fixed with pressure. James et al. suggested that the Pi and Pbm of guinea-pig airways remained constant when the lungs were inflated to TLC, because the mucosal folds flatten out as the airways distended in response to pressure (15). The results from the present study do not necessarily contradict those of James et al. The Pi in guinea pig trachea was ~25% longer in lungs fixed at TLC compared with the lungs fixed after bronchoconstriction. It is likely that this difference was not regarded as being significant, because no consistent difference was observed further down the airway tree. Furthermore, they filled lungs to the desired lung volume as a percent of predicted TLC, and in fluid-filled lungs the pressures required to reach TLC could be much less than the 20–30 cmH2O that is used to fix the lung postmortem. Another difference between the studies is that airways in the present study were inflated after ablation of endogenous smooth muscle tone. Guinea pig lungs are known to have substantial intrinsic ASM tone after resection (25, 26), and this in combination with a lower distending pressure could have contributed to the failure to find a change in the Pi of guinea pig airways. In the absence of tidal fluctuations in airway wall stress, human in vitro airways also develop considerable intrinsic smooth muscle tone (9, 17, 21, 3032). The shape of the pressure-volume curve for the human airways we studied, in the presence of smooth muscle tone, indicated that basement membrane strain may be minimal, or absent, even when distended to a transmural pressure of 21 cmH2O (i.e., volume at 21 cmH2O with tone was similar to 7 cmH2O without tone).

The potential significance of the findings of this study is apparent if we briefly review the pivotal studies that have reported increased ASM mass in asthma. In the earlier studies of Huber and Koessler (12), Dunnill et al. (6), Hossain and Heard (11), Takizawa and Thurlbeck (29), Hossain (10), and Sobonya (28), WAm was found to be increased, on average, by 2.2 ± 0.7-fold (n = 6 studies). These early investigators did not normalize the amount of ASM to Pi or Pbm, and they were, therefore, possibly comparing different-sized airways that were not lengthened in the case of the asthmatic lungs but were stretched lengthwise in the control lungs.

The results of all the studies in which WAm has been normalized to Pi or Pbm have shown a significant increase in ASM in airways from asthmatic compared with nonasthmatic lungs (2, 3, 7, 8, 16, 18, 27). Furthermore, airways from asthmatic subjects who died in status asthmaticus appear to have more ASM than airways from asthmatic subjects who died of other causes. It is normally hypothesized that the greater WAm in the group with fatal asthma is a marker of severity and contributed to their increased risk of dying from asthma. This makes sense, because it has been proposed that "for a given maximal muscle stress, greater muscle thickness allows the development of greater tension and thus more contraction of the lumen" (19). However, the results presented in this paper offer an alternative interpretation of these findings. Three studies, those by James et al. (16), Carroll et al. (3), and Saetta et al. (27), should be reviewed to examine the hypothesis that an increase in WAm normalized to Pi could potentially be the result of an artifact caused by tissue fixation procedures.

All three studies normalized WAm using Pi. James et al. grouped airways by Pi into different size ranges: Pi < 2 mm, Pi (membranous) ≥ 2 mm, Pi (cartilaginous) < 10 mm, and Pi ≥ 10 mm, and the corresponding ratios of WAm for asthma (mostly fatal asthma) vs. nonasthma were ~1.1, 3.0, 4.8, and 3.4 (P < 0.05 for the latter 3 values). The nonasthmatic lungs were inflation fixed with pressures of >20 cmH2O, but asthmatic lungs were fixed by simple immersion. Thus both artifacts (change in airway length and Pbm strain) could have contributed to the increase in WAm in asthmatic subjects. Carroll et al. inflation fixed all lungs with pressures >20 cmH2O, grouped airways by Pi into different size ranges [Pi < 2, 2 ≤ Pi < 4, 4 ≤ Pi < 10, 10 ≤ Pi < 18, and Pi > 18 (in mm)], and subdivided asthmatic patients into fatal and nonfatal asthma groups. The corresponding ratios of WAm were 1.2, 1.3,* 3.3,* 2.8,* and 2.3* for fatal asthma to nonasthma and 1.2, 1.6,* 1.5, 1.4, and 1.5 for nonfatal asthma to nonasthma (*P < 0.05) (3). If inflation fixation with pressures of >20 cmH2O resulted in comparatively similar lung volumes for each of the study groups, then only the artifact of Pbm strain could have contributed to the differences in WAm that was observed. The smaller increase in WAm in the airways from the nonfatal asthma group could be explained on the basis of the Pbm strain being greater than in the fatal asthma airways. In contrast, greater ASM tone or increased nonmuscle tissue stiffness could have caused decreased Pbm strain in the airways from the fatal asthma group, which would result in an apparent increase in WAm.

An artifact of fixation cannot explain all of the reports of increased ASM in asthmatic compared with nonasthmatic subjects. Saetta et al. (27) compared the area enclosed by ASM bundle perimeters in small airways (Pi of ~3 mm) from asthmatic and nonasthmatic tissues and found a 2.3-fold increase in asthmatic compared with the nonasthmatic tissue. Lungs from both groups were fixed without pressure perfusion, and the mean Pi of the airways compared were similar, which means that the increase in WAm observed cannot be attributed to differences in fixation pressure or stretched length of the airways.

Despite the studies that show an increase in ASM mass normalized to Pi, the data presented in this study suggest that the increase in ASM volume in asthma may have been overestimated in some studies. The importance of this observation relates to our understanding of the potential causes of excessive airway narrowing and hyperresponsiveness in asthma and indirectly to our efforts to develop new therapeutic strategies for asthma. If the amount of ASM is really approximately three times greater than normal in asthma and if the phenotype of the muscle is preserved despite hyperplasia and/or hypertrophy, then ASM mass per se is likely to be a very important contributor to airway hyperresponsiveness (19). If, on the other hand, ASM is only increased ~1.5-fold, then a change in ASM phenotype and/or other structural and functional changes in the airways may need to be invoked to explain airway hyperresponsiveness. Future studies are required to compare ASM amount in asthmatic and nonasthmatic airways that have not been inflated, do not exhibit intrinsic smooth muscle tone, and have been fixed and processed using a method that causes minimal changes in tissue volume.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
B. E. McParland was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award and a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship. The project was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We acknowledge the collaborative effort of the cardiopulmonary transplant team and the pathologists at St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Equipment was donated by Abbott Australia, Cyanamid Australia, and ADInstruments Australia.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: B. E. McParland, Univ. of British Columbia, James Hogg iCAPTURE Centre for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 1Y6 (E-mail: brentmcparland{at}hotmail.com).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Bai A, Eidelman DH, Hogg JC, James AL, Lambert RK, Ludwig MS, Martin J, McDonald DM, Mitzner WA, Okazawa M, Pack RJ, Pare PD, Schellenberg RR, Tiddens HA, Wagner EM, and Yager D. Proposed nomenclature for quantifying subdivisions of the bronchial wall. J Appl Physiol 77: 1011–1014, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bai TR, Cooper J, Koelmeyer T, Pare PD, and Weir TD. The effect of age and duration of disease on airway structure in fatal asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162: 663–669, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Carroll N, Elliot J, Morton A, and James A. The structure of large and small airways in nonfatal and fatal asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 147: 405–410, 1993.[ISI][Medline]
  4. Cook TA, Salmo NA, and Yates PO. The elasticity of the internal lamina. J Pathol 117: 253–258, 1975.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Dobrin PB. Effect of histologic preparation on the cross-sectional area of arterial rings. J Surg Res 61: 413–415, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  6. Dunnill M, Massarella G, and Anderson J. A comparison of the quantitative anatomy of the bronchi in normal subjects, in status asthmaticus, in chronic bronchitis, and in emphysema. Thorax 24: 176–179, 1969.[ISI][Medline]
  7. Ebina M, Takahashi T, Chiba T, and Motomiya M. Cellular hypertrophy and hyperplasia of airway smooth muscles underlying bronchial asthma. A 3-D morphometric study. Am Rev Respir Dis 148: 720–726, 1993.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Ebina M, Yaegashi H, Chiba R, Takahashi T, Motomiya M, and Tanemura M. Hyperreactive site in the airway tree of asthmatic patients revealed by thickening of bronchial muscles. A morphometric study. Am Rev Respir Dis 141: 1327–1332, 1990.[ISI][Medline]
  9. Ellis JL and Undem BJ. Role of cysteinyl-leukotrienes and histamine in mediating intrinsic tone in isolated human bronchi. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149: 118–122, 1994.[Abstract]
  10. Hossain S. Quantitative measurement of bronchial muscle in men with asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 107: 99–109, 1973.[ISI][Medline]
  11. Hossain S and Heard BE. Quantitative morphometry of bronchial muscle in females. Pak Med Rev 5: 411–422, 1970.
  12. Huber H and Koessler K. The pathology of bronchial asthma. Arch Intern Med 30: 689–760, 1922.[CrossRef][ISI]
  13. Hughes JM, Hoppin FG Jr, and Mead J. Effect of lung inflation on bronchial length and diameter in excised lungs. J Appl Physiol 32: 25–35, 1972.[Free Full Text]
  14. James AL, Hogg JC, Dunn LA, and Pare PD. The use of the internal perimeter to compare airway size and to calculate smooth muscle shortening. Am Rev Respir Dis 138: 136–139, 1988.[ISI][Medline]
  15. James AL, Pare PD, and Hogg JC. Effects of lung volume, bronchoconstriction, and cigarette smoke on morphometric airway dimensions. J Appl Physiol 64: 913–919, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. James AL, Pare PD, and Hogg JC. The mechanics of airway narrowing in asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 139: 242–246, 1989.[ISI][Medline]
  17. Jongejan RC, de Jongste JC, van Strik R, Raatgeep HR, Bonta IL, and Kerrebijn KF. Measurement of human small airway smooth muscle function in vitro. Comparison of bronchiolar strips and segments. J Pharmacol Methods 20: 135–142, 1988.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  18. Kuwano K, Bosken CH, Pare PD, Bai TR, Wiggs BR, and Hogg JC. Small airways dimensions in asthma and in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 148: 1220–1225, 1993.[ISI][Medline]
  19. Lambert RK, Wiggs BR, Kuwano K, Hogg JC, and Pare PD. Functional significance of increased airway smooth muscle in asthma and COPD. J Appl Physiol 74: 2771–2781, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Martin HB and Proctor DF. Pressure-volume measurements in dog bronchi. J Appl Physiol 13: 337–343, 1958.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. McKay KO, Johnson PR, Black JL, Glanville AR, and Armour CL. Airway structure and function in Eisenmenger's syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158: 1245–1252, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. McParland BE, Johnson PR, Armour CL, and Black JL. Novel adaptation of a method to assess responsiveness of bronchial segments in vitro. Eur Respir J 11: 1248–1256, 1998.[Abstract]
  23. McParland BE, Johnson PR, Armour CL, and Black JL. An epithelial-derived factor inhibits contraction in canine perfused bronchial segments. Eur J Pharmacol 402: 151–159, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  24. Okazawa M, Pare PD, and Lambert RK. Compliance of peripheral airways deduced from morphometry. J Appl Physiol 89: 2373–2381, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Reynolds AM and McEvoy RD. Prevention of abnormal pulmonary mechanics in the postmortem guinea pig lung. J Appl Physiol 64: 1322–1326, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Reynolds AM and McEvoy RD. Tachykinins mediate hypocapnia-induced bronchoconstriction in guinea pigs. J Appl Physiol 67: 2454–2460, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Saetta M, Di Stefano A, Rosina C, Thiene G, and Fabbri LM. Quantitative structural analysis of peripheral airways and arteries in sudden fatal asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 143: 138–143, 1991.[ISI][Medline]
  28. Sobonya RE. Quantitative structural alterations in long-standing allergic asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 130: 289–292, 1984.[ISI][Medline]
  29. Takizawa T and Thurlbeck WM. Muscle and mucous gland size in the major bronchi of patients with chronic bronchitis, asthma, and asthmatic bronchitis. Am Rev Respir Dis 104: 331–336, 1971.[ISI][Medline]
  30. Taylor SM, Pare PD, Armour CL, Hogg JC, and Schellenberg RR. Airway reactivity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Failure of in vivo methacholine responsiveness to correlate with cholinergic, adrenergic, or nonadrenergic responses in vitro. Am Rev Respir Dis 132: 30–35, 1985.[ISI][Medline]
  31. Tiddens HA, Hofhuis W, Bogaard JM, Hop WC, de Bruin H, Willems LN, and de Jongste JC. Compliance, hysteresis, and collapsibility of human small airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160: 1110–1118, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Watson N, Magnussen H, and Rabe KF. The relevance of resting tension to responsiveness and inherent tone of human bronchial smooth muscle. Br J Pharmacol 123: 694–700, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. L. James, F. H. Green, M. J. Abramson, T. R. Bai, M. Dolhnikoff, T. Mauad, K. O. McKay, and J. G. Elliot
Airway basement membrane perimeter distensibility and airway smooth muscle area in asthma
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2008; 104(6): 1703 - 1708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. J. Gunst
Does airway inflation stretch the bronchial mucosal membrane?
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2059 - 2060.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. B. Noble, A. Sharma, P. K. McFawn, and H. W. Mitchell
Elastic properties of the bronchial mucosa: epithelial unfolding and stretch in response to airway inflation
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2061 - 2066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/2/556    most recent
00982.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow