Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 96: 1464-1469, 2004. First published December 2, 2003; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01198.2003
8750-7587/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/4/1464    most recent
01198.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aliverti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Macklem, P. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aliverti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Macklem, P. T.

INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGY

Breath-by-breath assessment of alveolar gas stores and exchange

A. Aliverti,1 B. Kayser,2 and P. T. Macklem3

1Laboratorio di tecnologie Biomediche, Dipartimento di Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy; 2Faculty of Medicine, Université de Genève, CH1205 Switzerland; and 3Meakins-Christie Laboratories, Montreal Chest Institute, McGill University Health Center, H2X 2P4 Montreal, Canada

Submitted 10 November 2003 ; accepted in final form 24 November 2003


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 THEORY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The volume of O2 exchanged at the mouth during a breath (VO2,m) is equal to that taken up by pulmonary capillaries (VO2,A) only if lung O2 stores are constant. The latter change if either end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), or alveolar O2 fraction (FAO2) change. Measuring this requires breath-by-breath (BbB) measurement of absolute EELV, for which we used optoelectronic plethysmography combined with measurement of O2 fraction at the mouth to measure VO2,A = VO2,m - ({Delta}EELV·FAO2 + EELV·{Delta}FAO2), and divided by respiratory cycle time to obtain BbB O2 consumption (O2) in seven healthy men during incremental exercise and recovery. To synchronize O2 and volume signals, we measured gas transit time from mouthpiece to O2 meter and compared O2 measured during steady-state exercise by using expired gas collection with the mean BbB measurement over the same time period. In one subject, we adjusted the instrumental response time by 20-ms increments to maximize the agreement between the two O2 measurements. We then applied the same total time delay (transit time plus instrumental delay = 660 ms) to all other subjects. The comparison of pooled data from all subjects revealed r2 = 0.990, percent error = 0.039 ± 1.61 SE, and slope = 1.02 ± 0.015 (SE). During recovery, increases in EELV introduced systematic errors in O2 if measured without taking {Delta}EELV·FAO2+EELV·{Delta}FAO2 into account. We conclude that optoelectronic plethysmography can be used to measure BbB O2 accurately when studying BbB gas exchange in conditions when EELV changes, as during on- and off-transients.

oxygen consumption; exercise; opto-electronic plethysmography; respiration


THE MEASUREMENT OF RATE OF exchange of O2 and CO2 between alveolar gas and pulmonary capillary blood (O2 and CO2, respectively) on a breath-by-breath (BbB) basis is not accomplished simply by measuring the difference between the amount of O2 and CO2 inspired and that expired at the mouth during a particular breath. This difference includes changes in amounts of O2 and CO2 stored in alveolar gas that are not transferred to or from pulmonary capillary blood (1, 2, 4, 7). Lung storage of these gases changes if inspired and expired volumes are different and if alveolar concentrations of these gases change during the course of the breath. To correct for these errors in the BbB measurement of O2 and CO2, a continuous measure of absolute thoracic gas volume is required. Commercially available devices do not take this source of error into account.

In this paper, we take advantage of the ability of optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) (3) to track BbB changes in end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) accurately (6) to solve this problem. When the subdivisions of lung volume are separately measured and combined with OEP and continuous measurement of gas concentrations at the mouth, it is possible to partition the uptake of O2 and output of CO2 at the mouth into the volumes exchanged between pulmonary capillaries and alveolar gas and changes in alveolar gas stores. Here, we present in detail the methodology to obtain corrected BbB O2 by use of OEP.


    THEORY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 THEORY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Di Prampero and colleagues (4, 5) have reviewed the problems of measuring BbB O2 and we use their notation. The volume of O2 exchanged at the mouth (VO2,m) is the difference between the volume of O2 inspired and that expired. This is different from the amount of gas exchanged between alveolar gas and pulmonary capillaries (VO2,A) if the amount of O2 stored in the lungs ({Delta}VO2,s) changes. When gas stores increase VO2,m overestimates VO2,A and vice versa when the stores decrease

{Delta}VO2,s is itself made up of two components: the change in stores due to inequality of inspired and expired tidal volume at constant alveolar fraction of O2 (FAO2) and the change in FAO2 during the course of the breath at constant alveolar gas volume (VA)

(1)

where i represents the ith breath and i - 1 the immediately preceding breath. These interrelationships are illustrated with the breath shown in Fig. 1. This is a plot of O2 fraction (FO2) at the mouth against absolute lung gas volume (VL). Point B gives FO2 and VL at the end of breath i - 1 when the volume of O2 remaining in the lung is given by the area ABCO, the product of OA (the end-expiratory FO2) and OC (the endexpiratory VL). The inspiration of the ith breath proceeds from B to D, so the volume of O2 inspired is given by the area BDEC. Expiration proceeds from D to G; the VL expired is less than that inspired, and the FAO2 at the end of breath i is less than it was at the end of breath i - 1. The expired volume of O2 is given by the area GDEH, and the VO2, m is BDEC - GDEH, or the area BDGHC. The volume of O2 remaining in the lung at the end of the ith breath is given by FGHO. This is less than the amount remaining at the beginning of the breath, because of a decrease in FAO2 by an amount equal to ABKF = VA(i-1) [FAO2(i) - FAO2(i-1)] but is greater than at the beginning by an amount equal to KGHC = FAO2(i)[VA(i) - VA(i-1)] because the expired volume was less than the inspired volume, thereby adding to alveolar O2 stores. Correcting for changes in alveolar gas stores by subtracting KGHC from and adding ABKF to VO2,m reveals that the desired quantity VO2,A is given by the area ABDGF.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. O2 fraction (FO2) absolute lung volume (VL) diagram during a single breath, from which change in the amount of O2 stored in the lung is calculated. For details on how this is done, see text.

 

The combination of OEP with an independent measure of the subdivisions of lung volume allows accurate tracking of absolute lung volume, and, in normal subjects at least, the measurement of end-expiratory O2 concentration is a reasonable estimate of alveolar concentration. Thus all terms on the right-hand side of Eq. 1 can be measured, allowing a direct measurement of VO2,A. Dividing the measurement of VO2,A for each breath by the period for that breath gives a BbB measurement of O2.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 THEORY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects. We studied seven nonsmoking healthy male subjects, between 26 and 47 yr old, at rest and during an incremental exercise test. Their anthropometric characteristics and baseline lung function tests are shown in Table 1. This project was approved by the Italian Ministry of Health.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Subjects' characteristics and lung volumes

 

Equipment and procedures. To measure chest wall volume (Vcw) by OEP, 89 reflective markers were placed on the surface of the trunk ventrally and dorsally as previously described (3). The subjects were studied seated on an electrically braked cycle ergometer with their arms raised to the level of the shoulder to visualize the markers in the mid axillary line. The three-dimensional displacements of each of the reflective markers were measured by six video cameras (ELITE motion analysis system, BTS, Milano, Italy) placed in front and behind the subject and, using Gauss' theorem, Vcw was measured continuously (3).

The system was equipped with an accessory analog-to-digital data-acquisition system allowing recording of all other signals in parallel with OEP.

The subjects breathed with a nose clip in place, through a mouthpiece connected in series with a hot-wire anemometer flow-measuring device (Sensor Medics Vmax metabolic cart, Yorba Linda, CA), a screen-type pneumotachograph (3813 Hans Rudolph, Kansas City, MO) coupled to a pressure transducer (LCVR, 0-2 cmH2O; Celesco Instruments, Canoga Park, CA), and a valve that separated inspired and expired flow. From time to time, mixed expired gas was collected in a Douglas bag to measure the mixed expired O2 fraction (FEO2). Gas was also sampled just distal to the mouthpiece to measure inspired and expired O2 and CO2 concentrations at the mouth with paramagnetic and infrared meters, respectively (Sensor Medics Vmax). The combined flow rate through both O2 and CO2 sampling lines was 10 ml/s. The zero-flow baseline of the pneumotachograph signal was offset in the inspiratory direction by this amount to detect zero flow at the mouth.

Before exercise was initiated, functional residual capacity (FRC) was measured by nitrogen washout (Sensor Medics Vmax metabolic cart). Each subject breathed 100% O2 quietly while seated on the cycle ergometer until the end-tidal N2 concentration was <1%. Lung volume change was measured by integrating the flow measured by the exercise circuit's hot-wire anemometer device. The metabolic cart calculated the volume of N2 expired per breath from the expired O2 and CO2 concentrations, summed this, and, from the total amount of N2 expired, calculated the volume of gas in the lung at the beginning of the washout period. When the washout was completed, the subject performed at least three vital capacity maneuvers that, when combined with the measurement of FRC, gave the subdivisions of lung volume.

Incremental exercise test. After FRC and the other subdivisions of lung volume were measured, the subject remained on the cycle-ergometer and breathed quietly for 5 min. Expired gas was collected in the Douglas bag for the final 2 min in five subjects and for 1 min in the other two (because of technical problems with the OEP system). We then performed the exercise test starting at zero workload and increased the load in 20-W increments every 5 min up to and including 120 W. During the last 2 min (5 subjects) or 1 min (2 subjects) of each workload, expired gas was collected and mixed in a Douglas bag. FEO2 was then measured by the same O2 meter by temporarily removing the sampling line from the mouthpiece assembly and sampling mixed expired gas from the Douglas bag.

Gold standard measurement of O2. O2 was measured by the formula I·FIO2 - E·FEO2, where I is inspired minute ventilation, E is expired minute ventilation, and FIO2 is the inspired fraction of O2.I and E were measured by integrating the flow as measured by the pneumotachograph to obtain inspired and expired tidal volumes, respectively, and multiplying by respiratory frequency. O2 volume thus measured was considered as the internal gold standard of O2 volume in conditions of stable EELV and steady-state gas-exchange conditions. This allowed avoiding any influences of differences in temperature or saturation with water between conditions because all measurements of volumes for direct comparison were performed in strictly the same manner.

Measurement of BbB O2. By measuring the difference between the amount of O2 inspired (VIO2) and that expired (VEO2), we calculated VO2,m as VIO2 - VEO2. We corrected this for changes in O2 stored within the lung during the course of the breath, as indicated in Eq. 1, calculated VO2,A for each breath, and divided by the respiratory cycle time in minutes to obtain O2. As illustrated in Fig. 1, VIO2 was calculated as the area BDEC, and VEO2 was taken as the area GDEH. To obtain this diagram, we used the volumes measured by integrating flow as measured by the pneumotachograph. We did not use OEP volumes because they included volume changes due to gas compression and any blood shifts from trunk to extremities (9). We did not use the integral of flow measured by the hot-wire anemometer system because accurate zero-flow points are difficult to detect; as zero flow is approached, the Sensormedics system uses a switching device to detect cooling of the hot wire by flow from the opposite direction. This obscured precise identification of zero-flow points. However, before we could use integrated pneumotachograph flow, we had to accomplish three tasks: 1) correct for integrator drift, 2) measure the time delay of the O2-sampling line and the response time of the O2 meter to synchronize the O2 and volume signals precisely, and 3) correct the VO2,m for any changes in O2 stored within the lung.

Correction for integrator drift. Although we did not use OEP Vcw measurements to calculate VIO2 and VEO2 because of possible errors due to gas compression and blood shifts, these errors are not present at end inspiration when alveolar pressure is atmospheric. Therefore, we measured end-inspiratory VL as total lung capacity minus the difference between Vcw as measured at total lung capacity by OEP and end-inspiratory Vcw. For each breath, the end-inspiratory volume, measured by integrating pneumotachograph flow, was set to be equal to VL measured by OEP, and the preceding inspiratory volume was used to measure VIO2 and the following expiration to calculate VEO2 for that particular breath. Each BbB O2 measurement was treated as a separate discrete event.

Avoiding temperature effects on gas volumes. To avoid any influences of differences in temperature between conditions, all measurements of volumes for direct comparison were performed in strictly the same manner, i.e., with the pneumotachograph.

Synchronization of O2 and VL signals. To synchronize the O2 and VL signals, we had to measure the delay time for a quantum of gas to travel the length of the sampling tube from the mouthpiece assembly to the paramagnetic O2 meter and the response time of the meter. To do this, we made a circuit similar in principle to the one reported by Proctor and Beck (11), consisting of a chamber covered by a rubber membrane covered with a piece of aluminum foil. The chamber contained a mixed expired gas sample. The gas-sampling line was removed from the exercise circuit, and an 18-gauge needle was attached to the inlet port. The needle was connected to a battery, the other pole of which was connected to the aluminum foil and the analog-to-digital board. Thus, when the needle was plunged rapidly through the foil, from air to mixed expired gas, it completed the electrical circuit, generating a signal the instant that the gas being sampled changed. From this we measured the delay time as the time between the generation of the electrical signal and the instant the O2 concentration began to fall. An example of the tracings obtained is shown in Fig. 2. As can be seen in this figure, the response of the meter was sigmoid shaped, which represents a combination of diffusive mixing at the front between mixed expired gas and fresh air, plus the instrumental response time. We were unable to measure the meter's response time accurately for two reasons: 1) the sigmoid response was not symmetrical; the initial fall in O2 concentration was sharper than the curve at the final plateau, and thus we could not precisely distinguish between diffusive mixing and the instrumental response time; 2), the sampling rate of the OEP system was 50 Hz so the resolution of the common time base was 20 ms. Because the instrumental response time was on the order of 100 ms, our time-base resolution did not permit a precise measurement of the response time. To deal with this problem, we compared the gold standard measurement of O2 with one subject's values of the mean BbB O2 measured at each workload over the same time period. This gave us a plot of all measured values of mean BbB O2 against all measured gold standard values at a given value of the instrumental response time plus the constant transit-time delay in that individual. We then varied the instrumental response time in 20-ms increments, over a total time delay (gas transit time plus instrumental response time) ranging from 620 to 700 ms, to determine which instrumental response time gave us data closest to the line of identity, and applied this response time to all other subjects.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Diagram illustrating how the time delay of the O2 sampling and response time of the O2 meter were measured. A needle was fitted to the end of the sampling catheter and thrust through a patch of aluminum foil into a bag containing mixed expired gas. This closed an electrical circuit shown by the vertical deflection of the lower line, at time 1. The O2 concentration as shown in the upper line began to fall at time 2. Time 2 - 1 gives the transit time for a quantum of gas to travel from the port of the sampling tube at the mouthpiece to the meter. Because the sampling rate of the optoelectronic plethysmograph (OEP) system was 50 Hz, we tried various points at 20-ms increments along the down slope of the FO2 curve, for total time delays of 620-700 ms, to determine which time delay gave values of breath-by-breath (BbB) O2 uptake (O2) closest to the gold standard.

 

Correction for changes in lung O2 stores. The volume of O2 contained in the lung before the measurement of O2 during the ith breath is given by the product of preinspiratory VA(i) (given by the distance OA in Fig. 1) and FAO2(i-1) (given by the distance OC in Fig. 1). The volume of O2 contained in the lung at the end of the ith breath is given by the product of end-expiratory VA(i) and FAO2(i). The difference between these two volumes is the change in volume of O2 stored in the lung during the course of the breath. If this has increased, the amount of the increase must be subtracted from VO2,m to obtain VO2,A. If the volume of O2 stored in the lung decreases during the breath, the amount of the decrease must be added to VO2,m to obtain VO2,A. All the variables on the right-hand side of Eq. 1 are measured and VO2,m can be calculated. How this was done graphically to obtain VO2,m as the area ABDGF is illustrated in Fig. 1.

All results are reported as means ± SE. O2,m and O2,A were compared by linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 THEORY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Table 2 gives the values of slope, intercept, r2, and percent error of the linear regressions between the gold standard measurement of O2 and mean BbB O2, in each individual at each of the four time delays. A total time delay of 660 ms gave the best fit to the gold standard measurement O2. Although two individuals had an intercept closer to zero at 640 ms, their values for slope showed better agreement with the gold standard at 660 ms. At 680 ms, five individuals had an intercept closer to zero than at 660 ms, but in four of these the values of slope, r2, and percent error were as good as or better at 660 ms. Only one individual had better values for intercept, slope, and r2 at 680 ms, but the percent error at that time delay was 8.9% compared with 3.8% at 660 ms. We concluded that in our setup a total time delay of 660 ms provides the most accurate measurement of BbB O2. This conclusion is also supported by the mean values, which were better in every category at a time delay of 660 ms than at the other three delays. When this value was used, the percent error ranged from -3.6 to 7.0%, but the mean value was only 2.4 ± 1.4%.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Comparison of gold standard and BbB measurement of Vo2: individual slope, r2, and errors at different delay times

 

Figure 3A is a pooled comparison in all subjects between the mean BbB O2 and the gold standard O2, using the different time delays. The lines are the linear regressions for each time delay. Each datum is a single point from one subject at a given exercise level. Thus, for any given time delay, the regression consists of the O2 values measured at each exercise workload in each subject. This figure also shows that at a delay time of 660 ms the BbB measurement of O2 is closest to the gold standard.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. A: identity plot of BbB O2 against the steady-state (SS; gold standard) method at different transit times plus instrumental response delays. Each line is the linear regression for pooled data in all subjects at every exercise level. Each datum therefore is the result in 1 individual at a given exercise workload. The regression line for 660 ms is closest to the identity line. B: slopes ± SE of the linear regressions shown in A as a function of delay time. For a delay of 660 ms, the slope was nearest to 1. C: r2 values of the linear regressions shown in A as a function of delay time. For a delay of 660 ms, the r2 was highest.

 

This is shown even more clearly in Fig. 3, B and C. Figure 3B plots the slope ± SE of the regression, and Fig. 3C the r2 value against the time delay. A delay time of 660 ms gives a slope close to 1 and the highest r2 value.

Figure 4 shows the Bland-Altman analysis comparing the difference between the BbB estimate of O2 and the steady-state O2 measurements for the different time delays. Again the time delay of 660 ms gives the optimal result. At a time delay of 660 ms, the average percent error was negligible.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Bland-Altman analysis of the similarity between BbB and gold standard measures of O2 (O2,ss) at delay times of 620 (A), 640 (B), 660 (C), 680 (D), and 700 (E) ms. Solid horizontal line, mean of the data; dashed lines, ±2 SD. At a delay of 660 ms, error and trend are smallest.

 

When changes in lung O2 stores are random because of random fluctuations in EELV, the average VO2,m will be close to VO2,A, because the errors due to increases in EELV will be cancelled by errors due to the decreases. However, when EELV changes systematically, such as during the onset and end of exercise or during dynamic hyperinflation, the error will be systematic. This is illustrated in Fig. 5. Figure 5A shows the systematic increase in EELV at the end of exercise (marked by the left-hand arrow). Between the two arrows, EELV increases by more than 0.5 liter. Figure 5B shows the FO2 vs. absolute lung volume loops moving BbB to the right during this recovery period. Figure 5C is an identity plot of the O2 at the mouth (ordinate) vs. the O2 by the pulmonary capillaries as measured by OEP on the abscissa. All but two points lie above the line of identity. Figure 5D is a Bland-Altman analysis demonstrating the systematic nature of the error. Figure 5E shows O2,A and O2,m as a function of time after the end of exercise.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Diagrams illustrating the systematic error in BbB O2 measurement when there is a systematic change in end-expiratory lung volume (EELV). A: OEP tracings of total chest wall volume (Vcw) change at the end of exercise and during recovery after. The end of exercise is at 38 s (left arrow), and with time EELV then changes. To emphasize the effect of EELV, a series of breaths when changes in EELV are particularly big (between the 2 arrows) are shown in B, C, and D. B: FO2 vs. VL plots during recovery from exercise between the 2 arrows shown in A. The progressive increase in EELV displaced the loops progressively to the right, increasing the O2 stored within the lung. When this is not taken into account, the FO2-vs.-VL diagram is not a closed loop because the EELV is greater at the end of the breath than at the beginning. This leads to an overestimate of BbB O2 as shown in C, which is an identity plot of O2 by the pulmonary capillaries (O2,A) vs. O2,m calculated by measuring the difference between the volume of O2 inspired minus the volume expired. D: Bland-Altman analysis of the data shown in C. E: BbB O2,A () and O2,m ({circ}) as a function of time. O2,m overestimates O2 by the pulmonary capillaries in the first period because of the changes in pulmonary O2 stores. Exponential curves fitting the 2 data sets are also shown. The time constant {tau} of the O2,m off-transient was 46.1 s and that of the O2,A 43.1 s.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 THEORY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The main finding reported here is that it is now technically feasible to correct BbB measurements of O2 measured at the mouth for changes in pulmonary O2 content. To date, the unknown changes in EELV made this correction difficult. In addition to the error introduced by changes in EELV, the correction for differences in gas concentration at the beginning and end of the breath requires a BbB measurement of absolute gas volume. The absence of a solution to this problem has been the principal reason that accurate measures of BbB gas exchange have not generally been available. Even in a whole body plethysmograph, thermal instability and humidity changes make continuous tracking of absolute volume difficult, and measurements during exercise have been hitherto impossible. This led Gronlund (8) to take a different approach to calculate O2 by choosing points on the expiratory tracings where FO2 were identical so that VL ·{Delta}F became zero. OEP offers another solution to this problem because it can track absolute lung volume on a continuous basis.

This is particularly useful when on- and off-transients of exercise are studied, when the changes in O2 measured at the mouth are often used to study transients in O2 at tissue level. For illustration of this fact, we collected data during the off-transient at the end of an exercise bout in one subject. EELV changed over time during the off-transient of exercise (Fig. 5A), and these changes were accompanied by changes in end-expiratory O2 fractions (Fig. 5B). Together, this led to an overestimation of O2 uptake due to an increase in O2 stores in the lung as shown on a BbB basis in Fig. 5, C and D.

In Fig. 5E, the effect on the time constant of BbB changes in O2 during the off-transient is shown. The data were fitted with the following exponential function: y = y0 + a x exp(-t/{tau}). With correction for changes in lung O2 stores, {tau} was 43.1 s, whereas in the uncorrected condition it was 46.1 s, a difference of 6.5%. Furthermore, the uncorrected data are poorly fitted by a single exponential.

In a recent paper, Capelli and colleagues (4) reviewed the problems of using conventional BbB measurement of gas exchange at the mouth. They reviewed and compared different techniques to take into account the errors induced in situations in which alveolar gas stores do not remain constant between successive breaths. Capelli et al. concluded that the method of Gronlund (8) based on the definition of a breath being the period between two identical values of gas concentrations at the mouth was a promising way to improve the accurateness of BbB gas exchange at the mouth. In a subsequent paper (5), Capelli and colleagues showed that this method allows BbB measurement of alveolar gas exchange during on-transients of exercise. However, all the known methods require certain a priori assumptions to be made, of which the precise effect on the error of measurement remains obscure. Our method, which essentially represents a solution to the original idea by Linnarson (10), does not require any assumption about initial alveolar stores or the assumption that expired gas concentrations at the mouth faithfully reflect alveolar gas concentrations.

In conclusion, OEP allows the measurement of BbB O2 at the alveolar-capillary interface during non-steady-state conditions such as the on- or off-transients of exercise, fully taking into account BbB changes in EELV and lung O2 stores. It thus becomes a method of choice for the study of the relationship between O2 uptake in the blood in the lung and peripheral O2 consumption.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 THEORY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported in part by the European Community FP5 project Computer-Aided Rehabilitation of Respiratory Diseases CARED (contract no. QLG5-CT-2002-0893).


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. Aliverti, Dipartimento di Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, P.zza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy (E-mail: andrea.aliverti{at}polimi.it).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 THEORY
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Auchincloss JH Jr, Gilbert R, and Baule GH. Effect of ventilation on oxygen transfer during early exercise. J Appl Physiol 21: 810-818, 1966.[Free Full Text]
  2. Auchincloss JH Jr, Gilbert R, and Baule GH. Contribution of pulmonary stores to oxygen uptake. J Appl Physiol 29: 230-235, 1970.[Free Full Text]
  3. Cala SJ, Kenyon CM, Ferrigno G, Carnevali P, Aliverti A, Pedotti A, Macklem PT, and Rochester DF. Chest wall and lung volume estimation by optical reflectance motion analysis. J Appl Physiol 81: 2680-2689, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Capelli C, Cautero M, and di Prampero PE. New perspectives in breath-by-breath determination of alveolar gas exchange in humans. Pflügers Arch 441: 566-577, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Cautero M, Beltrami AP, di Prampero PE, and Capelli C. Breath-by-breath alveolar oxygen transfer at the onset of step exercise in humans: methodological implications. Eur J Appl Physiol 88: 203-213, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Dellacà R, Aliverti A, Pelosi P, Carlesso E, Chiumello D, Pedotti A, and Gattinoni L. Estimation of end-expiratory lung volume variations by optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP). Crit Care Med 29: 1807-1811, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Di Prampero PE and Lafortuna CL. Breath-by-breath estimate of alveolar gas transfer variability in man at rest and during exercise. J Physiol 415: 459-475, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Gronlund J. A new method for breath-to-breath determination of oxygen flux across the alveolar membrane. Eur J Appl Physiol 52: 167-172, 1984.[CrossRef]
  9. Iandelli I, Aliverti A, Kayser B, Dellacà R, Cala S, Duranti R, Kelly S, Scano G, Sliwinski P, Yan S, Macklem PT, and Pedotti A. Determinants of exercise performance in normal men with externally imposed expiratory flow-limitation. J Appl Physiol 92: 1943-1952, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Linnarson D. Dynamics of pulmonary gas exchange and heart rate at start and end of exercise. Acta Physiol Scand 415, Suppl: 1-68, 1974.
  11. Proctor DN and Beck KC. Delay time adjustments to minimize errors in breath-by-breath measurement of O2 during exercise. J Appl Physiol 81: 2495-2499, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ERRHome page
P. T. Macklem
Circulatory effects of expiratory flow-limited exercise, dynamic hyperinflation and expiratory muscle pressure
Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2006; 15(100): 80 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/4/1464    most recent
01198.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aliverti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Macklem, P. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aliverti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Macklem, P. T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Physiological Society.