Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 96: 1451-1458, 2004. First published December 5, 2003; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01051.2003
8750-7587/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/4/1451    most recent
01051.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (37)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tesch, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ekberg, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tesch, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ekberg, A.

Hypertrophy of chronically unloaded muscle subjected to resistance exercise

P. A. Tesch,1,2,3 J. T. Trieschmann,1 and A. Ekberg3

1Department of Geriatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205; and Departments of 2Physiology and Pharmacology and 3Clinical Physiology, Huddinge University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden

Submitted 29 September 2003 ; accepted in final form 2 December 2003


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
In an effort to simulate the compromised function and atrophy of lower limb muscles experienced by astronauts after spaceflight, 21 men and women age 30-56 yr were subjected to unilateral lower limb unloading for 5 wk. Whereas 10 of these subjects performed unilateral knee extensor resistance exercise (ULRE) two or three times weekly, 11 subjects (UL) refrained from training. The exercise regimen consisted of four sets of seven maximal actions, using an apparatus that offers concentric and eccentric resistance by utilizing the inertia of rotating flywheel(s). Knee extensor muscle strength was measured before and after UL and ULRE, and knee extensor and ankle plantar flexor muscle volumes were determined by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Surface electromyographic activity measured after UL inferred increased muscle use to perform a given motor task. UL induced an 8.8% decrease (P < 0.05) in knee extensor muscle volume. After ULRE and as a result of only ~16 min of maximal contractile activity over the 5-wk course, muscle volume increased 7.7% (P < 0.05). Muscle strength decreased 24-32% (P < 0.05) in response to UL. Group ULRE showed maintained (P > 0.05) strength. Ankle plantar flexor muscle volume of the unloaded limb decreased (P < 0.05) in both groups (UL 10.5%; ULRE 11.1%). In neither group did the right weight-bearing limb show any change (P > 0.05) in muscle volume or strength. The results of this study provide evidence that resistance exercise not only may offset muscle atrophy but is in fact capable of promoting marked hypertrophy of chronically unloaded muscle.

flywheel resistance exercise; skeletal muscle atrophy and hypertrophy; spaceflight; unilateral lower limb unloading


SKELETAL MUSCLE ATROPHY AND associated impaired neuromuscular function shown after spaceflight (38, 39, 41) may present serious obstacles to space exploration (33, 46). Although the specificity or magnitude of such changes has not been disclosed in detail, countermeasures to these effects are imperative on future long-duration missions into orbit. Collectively, a wealth of terrestrial studies in humans show that resistance-type exercise, particularly programs emphasizing coupled concentric and eccentric actions (17, 23, 31, 36), promotes important increases in muscle size and strength. It therefore seems tenable that resistance exercise would offer an effective stimulus to maintain muscle mass and strength in microgravity.

Indeed, resistance exercise regimens did attenuate or offset skeletal muscle atrophy (3, 4, 47) and strength decrements (3, 4, 6, 7, 28, 29, 47) when employed during periods of chronic, simulated spaceflight. However, studies that prescribed high-load resistance-training programs to individuals subjected to bed rest or unilateral lower limb suspension used either isometric actions or exercise systems that depend on the pull of gravity and examined responses to relatively short, i.e., 14- to 21-day, interventions (2, 3, 6, 7, 28, 29, 47). Time-consuming, high-volume low-intensity resistance exercise programs employed during long-duration spaceflight simulation have mitigated yet not prevented the negative effects of chronic unloading on skeletal muscle function (37, 43). Because of the inherent problems of simulating and performing weight training in space, we introduced a mechanical, non-gravity-dependent exercise system that utilizes the inertia of rotating flywheel(s) to provide resistance (14, 16, 48). A recent 5-wk resistance exercise regimen, which employed this system configured for monoarticulate knee extensor actions, produced marked muscle hypertrophy in ambulatory men and women (49).

The present study examined the efficacy of this resistance exercise paradigm, to serve as a countermeasure to muscle and strength loss during ground-based unloading. In an effort to simulate the effects of weightlessness on muscle, individuals were subjected to unilateral lower limb unloading (1, 10, 11, 15, 21, 30, 44, 47) with or without concurrent resistance exercise over 5 wk.

On the basis of previous findings, we predicted that quadriceps muscle volume would decrease almost 10% in response to this challenge and that this effect would be accompanied by a decrease in maximal voluntary strength of even greater magnitude (1, 10, 21, 30, 47). Furthermore, it was hypothesized that the proposed resistance exercise regimen would mitigate or offset the effects of unloading on quadriceps muscle size and function. The experimental design also allowed us to compare knee extensor and ankle plantar flexor muscle loss. Because quadriceps muscles are involved in the exercise mode employed here, they but not the ankle plantar flexor muscle group were believed to show maintained size and strength when subjected to this challenge. Our data suggest that resistance exercise of concurrently unloaded skeletal muscle not only maintains volume but in fact produces hypertrophy.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
General design. Twenty-one men and women volunteered for this study. They were subjected to unilateral unloading of the lower limb for 5 wk. Ten of these subjects in addition performed resistance exercise, using the unloaded limb, two or three times weekly (ULRE). The 11 subjects who performed unloading only (UL) refrained from any physical activity. Before this, subjects participated in three sessions over 2 wk to practice and become familiar with the different procedures: unloading, resistance training, and strength tests. To establish baseline data, all subjects then performed these tests 1 day before the two different interventions. Post measurements were performed on day 1 after UL and ULRE. With use of magnetic resonance imaging, volume of knee extensor and plantar flexor muscles was measured before and on completion of UL and ULRE and before subjects resumed weight bearing. These measurements were always carried out before the muscle function tests. The resistance exercise program was completed ~72 h before any postmeasurement. Also, we took advantage of the unloading intervention and as an additional aim assessed the influence of resumed weight bearing on muscle use. Hence, surface electromyographic (EMG) activity was measured in group UL during a standardized exercise task performed postunloading.

Subjects. Subjects were 21 healthy men and women, age 30-56 yr, with physical characteristics and fitness levels comparable to those of the astronaut corps (Table 1). At the time of being recruited, the subjects did not participate in any regular training programs and refrained from intense or systematic exercise throughout the study. A medical examination excluded women who were on contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy and individuals who were hypertensive or reported past or present knee pathology. Subjects were then matched by gender, body size, age, and knee extensor strength, such that individuals were assigned to either ULRE or UL. Group UL consisted of seven men and four women, whereas group ULRE was made up of seven men and three women. All subjects complied with the prescribed unloading and resistance training protocols (see below).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Subject characteristics

 

A written consent was given after the procedures, risks, and premises associated with participation in the study had been explained. The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Unilateral lower limb unloading. Unilateral unloading of the left lower limb was accomplished by using the model introduced in our laboratory (10, 11) and subsequently modified (21, 30). In brief, for any upright or ambulatory activities, short-length crutches, aided by handgrip and forearm support distal to the elbow (Swereco Rehab, Sollentuna, Sweden) were used (Fig. 1). The right foot was equipped with a shoe having a 10-cm-thick sole. This removed weight bearing from the left unloaded limb, which could adopt a straight position and yet move passively about the hip joint. Because there were no straps attached to the shoe restraining ankle- (or knee-) joint movement, the foot dropped using this particular model. Car transportation was possible because all subjects had access to a car equipped with an automatic shift. Subjects lived at home and maintained their normal work tasks throughout the experimental period. To encourage compliance, all subjects were interviewed by one of the investigators via telephone or in person on a daily basis. The volunteers also interacted at regular social gatherings. Skin temperature and circumference were measured midcalf at least twice weekly during scheduled visits to the laboratory. Because the unloaded calf consistently shows 2-3°C lower skin temperature and 2-3 cm greater circumference than the weight-bearing limb a few hours after resuming a nonsupine position (44), we believe these are valid measures of compliance.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Cartoon picturing the unilateral lower limb model employed. Note that there is no restraint preventing movement about the ankle or knee joint.

 

As prophylaxis to venous thromboembolism, subjects received a daily dose of 325 mg aspirin. In addition, they wore knee-length, medical-graded (class 2) compression stockings (BSN-Jobst, Rutherford College, NC) during any ambulatory activity. Three men assigned to group UL who complained about posterior leg pain 12-21 days into the intervention were admitted to ultrasound-Doppler examinations. In all three cases, clinical assessments excluded suspected deep venous thrombosis; one subject was diagnosed with a minor superficial thrombosis. These individuals were then administered daily injections of low-molecular-weight heparin (Fragmin 2500 IE), and the reported symptoms of pain subsided and all subjects completed the study without any disruption.

Resistive exercise device. For the purpose of training, an exercise system using the flywheel principle (14) and a configuration constructed for the seated knee extension (Ref. 49; YoYo Technology, Stockholm, Sweden) was employed. The frame of the apparatus, crafted in rectangular steel tubing, is equipped with a pivoting lever arm; its center of rotation is aligned with the knee joint. The lever arm, whose length is adjustable, has a perpendicular shin-padded cross bar mounted at its distal end. While seated and slightly reclined and using back support and upper body restraint, the trainee pushes against the cross bar while grasping the handlebars. From a starting position of ~90° knee angle, flywheel rotation is initiated through the pull of a sturdy nylon strap, which is anchored to the distal part of the lever arm and loops around its curved cam. The strap enters through a slot of the flywheel shaft where it is fixed. Energy is imparted to the flywheel while the strap unwinds off the shaft. Once the pushing concentric phase has been completed at ~160-170° knee angle, the strap then rewinds by virtue of the kinetic energy of the rotating flywheel. While gently resisting the force produced by the pull of the rotating flywheel during the initial eccentric phase, the trainee then aims at bringing the flywheel(s) to a stop at ~90° knee angle. This action is followed by the immediate initiation of a subsequent cycle. The ergometer is equipped with an electrogoniometer, which is affixed onto and aligned with the rotational center of the machine lever arm, and a miniature compression load cell (model 276A, K-toyo, Seoul, Korea) is mounted such that force is measured through the pull of the strap.

Resistance training protocol. Unilateral resistance exercise with the left limb was performed twice (weeks 1, 3, and 5) or thrice (weeks 2 and 4) weekly. Each session consisted of four sets of seven maximal, coupled concentric and eccentric knee extensions from ~90 to 160-170° knee joint angle. One polymer flywheel (440 x 20 mm; 4.2 kg) was used to provide resistance during training. Sets, interspersed by 2-min rest periods, were initiated immediately after two submaximal actions. Any exercise session was preceded by a 5-min warm-up consisting of three sets of seven actions carried out with progressively increased effort. Because the coupled concentric and eccentric cycle is completed in ~3 s, any exercise session consisted of roughly 80 s of contractile activity at maximal effort. Less than 70 s per session used low-force actions. Any exercise session, including warm-up and rest periods, was completed in ~15 min.

Force was measured during each exercise session. Subjects received verbal encouragement, and, by producing force and joint angle signals on a personal computer (PC) display, instant performance feedback was provided during exercise. An analog-to-digital converting system (MuscleLab, Ergotest, Langesund, Norway), which was interfaced to the PC, integrated these signals and also served to log performance during training. The average force in a 30° window from 5° above the angle at which the transition from eccentric to concentric action occurred was measured. Training load was calculated as the average concentric and eccentric force, respectively, in that particular window from repetitions 2-7 of each of the four sets. Although eccentric peak force, and hence "eccentric overload," occurs near the deflection point, typically the average concentric force in the 30° window equals or exceeds the average eccentric force (49).

Maximal strength. Unilateral (right and left limb) maximal voluntary isometric force (MVC) was measured in the seated knee extension device (see above) at 90 and 120° knee angle (49) and, in the multijoint seated leg press at 90° knee angle, as described elsewhere (14). Three trials of each test mode and limb were allowed to assess MVC; i.e., average force in a 1-s window once a force plateau had been established. The order (right vs. left limb) for each of the different tests employed was random among subjects. Subjects were restrained by chest and thigh straps (knee extension) and allowed to grasp the handlebars while performing these tests. Force was measured by using the compression load cell, as described above, or using a strain gauge mounted on the footplate and attached via a ball-and- socket joint to the moment arm (leg press). On any day of use, the exercise and measuring systems were calibrated with use of standardized weights certified to 0.01%. The day-to-day coefficient of variation in assessing knee extension or leg press MVC ranges 3-6% (present study, Ref. 49).

Electromyography. EMG activity was measured before and after 60 min reambulation after unloading (group UL only). A task required subjects to sustain an isometric action at 20% of the pre-UL MVC for 10 s at 120° knee angle (see above). Knee extensor EMG activity from the three superficial aspects of the quadriceps femoris was recorded by using disposable bipolar Ag-AgCl surface EMG electrodes (10-mm diameter, 16-mm interelectrode distance; Multi Bio Sensors, El Paso, TX) affixed over the vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), and rectus femoris (RF). The reference electrode was placed over the patella. Electrodes were retained throughout these sets of experiments. Likewise, individual amplification level of each EMG electrode channel was maintained across the two measurements. The raw EMG signal was amplified 600 times and then band-pass filtered at cutoff frequencies 6-1,500 Hz. The filtered signal was converted to a root-mean-square signal using AD536 circuit (Analog Devices, Norwood, MA) with a 100-ms time constant. Torque and root-mean-square signals were digitized at 100 Hz and subsequently processed by using the MuscleLab system (see Resistance training protocol) for the MP100WS. The integrated EMG activity for each individual muscle was analyzed.

Imaging techniques and analysis. Magnetic resonance images were collected by use of a 1.5-T Signa scanner (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI). In assessing muscle volume, precautions were taken to minimize any potential influence that acute fluid shifts (13, 18) or soft tissue compression might have, by use of procedures described elsewhere (49). After coronal scout images, axial scans (echo time 9.0 ms, repetition time 2,000 ms, contiguous 10-mm images) were obtained from the femoral head to the knee joint and from the knee joint to the lateral malleolus. The field of view was 480 (thigh) and 240 or 360 mm (calf), respectively.

After electronic data transfer of images, cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements and calculations were performed by use of a public-domain software package (Scion Image Beta 4.0.2 for Windows, Scion, Frederick, MD) on a PC. By using computerized planimetry (Intuos Graphic Tablet System, Wacom, Vancouver, WA), regions of interest, e.g., VL, VM, vastus intermedius (VI), and RF were identified from the displayed images, manually traced by using a mouse-pen, and then automatically computed. Ankle plantar flexor muscle area was assessed by producing a straight line between the anterior boundaries of the lateral and medial aspects of the gastrocnemius. The area containing both the soleus and gastrocnemius muscles was then encircled. This approach allowed accurate measurements of the major portion (>80%) of the soleus and the entire gastrocnemius. To assess quadriceps or calf muscle volume of any individual, 12-15 interleaved, serial images were chosen.

Volume of individual quadriceps muscles was assessed by analyzing images from the most distal one containing RF to the most proximal image not containing the gluteal muscle. Likewise, CSA of all images beginning with the first one where both tibia and fibula appeared and ending with the most distal image containing both heads of the gastrocnemius were measured to assess plantar flexor volume. Muscle volume was determined by multiplying the measured CSA by slice thickness and number of slices being analyzed from any particular limb. We estimate the approach employed measures at least 70-80% of "real" quadriceps and triceps surae muscle volumes (49).

Body fat percentage. Body fat percentage was calculated from multiple (biceps, triceps, suprailiac, and front thigh) skinfolds by use of a Harpenden caliper (34).

Statistics. All group values presented are means ± SD. Data were analyzed with repeated-measures two- or three-way analysis of variance. When significant main effects were found, variables were contrasted post hoc with a least significant test. The relative changes in muscle volume and voluntary force were compared between groups by using an independent t-test. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Body composition. Neither UL nor ULRE induced any changes (P > 0.05) in body weight or body fat percentage (group UL: 16.5 ± 8.9 vs. 15.5 ± 7.9%; and group ULRE: 14.8 ± 3.9 vs. 14.1 ± 3.8) over the 5-wk interventions.

Calf temperature and circumference. Overall, calf temperature was ~2-3°C lower (P < 0.05) in the unloaded left leg compared with the weight-bearing right leg. Conversely, calf circumference was ~2-3 cm larger (P < 0.05) in the unloaded compared with the weight-bearing leg (Fig. 2). The two groups showed similar (P > 0.05) differences across legs.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Calf temperature and circumference of right (R; gray symbols) and left (L; black symbols) legs for the unloaded group (group UL; A) and the unloaded plus resistance exercise group (group ULRE; B) over the 5-wk intervention. Temp, temperature.

 

Muscle performance. Average force during concentric and eccentric actions increased 11.1 and 10.8% (P < 0.05; Fig. 3), respectively, over the 12 exercise sessions.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Training response in group ULRE across the 12 exercise sessions. Average force in a 30° window (50) is shown, where black diamonds and gray squares denote concentric (CON) and eccentric (ECC) actions, respectively. Values are means ± SD. Grand mean of average force produced in actions 2-7 of the 30° window was calculated and averaged across the 4 sets for each individual to determine training load on a particular day.

 

Muscle volume. UL induced a decrease (P < 0.05) in quadriceps muscle volume of the left limb corresponding to 8.8%. Quadriceps muscle volume increased 7.7% (P < 0.05) in group ULRE. In neither group did volume of the right limb change (P > 0.05; Fig. 4). Individual quadriceps muscles showed differential responses to both UL and ULRE (Table 2). The decrease (P < 0.05) in plantar flexor muscle volume of the left leg was comparable in groups UL (10.5%) and ULRE (11.1%). The weight-bearing right leg showed no change in either group (Fig. 5).



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Quadriceps muscle volume pre (open bars) and post (solid bars) intervention in group UL and group ULRE. L, left limb; R, right limb. Values are means ± SD. *Significant difference from pretest (P < 0.05).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Volume of individual muscles and muscle groups before and after 5 wk of UL and ULRE

 


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Triceps surae muscle volume pre (open bars) and post (solid bars) intervention in group UL and group ULRE. Values are means ± SD. *Significant difference from pretest (P < 0.05).

 

Muscle strength. Knee extensor MVC of the left limb at 90 and 120° decreased (P < 0.05) 24 and 26%, respectively, in group UL. There was a nonsignificant (P > 0.05) 7-8% decrease in group ULRE. In neither group did the weight-bearing right limb show a change (P > 0.05; Figs. 6 and 7). However, and regardless of group, the responses across legs were different (P < 0.05), such that the left limb showed greater strength loss than the right limb over time. Leg press MVC of the left limb showed a 32% decrease (P < 0.05) in group UL. The corresponding decrease (P < 0.05) in group ULRE was 12%. This decay was, however, smaller (P < 0.05) in group ULRE than in group UL. Either group showed maintained (P > 0.05) leg press MVC of the right limb. However, although the response across limbs was different (P < 0.05) in group UL, the change in leg press MVC over time was similar (P > 0.05) for the left and right limbs in group ULRE (Fig. 8).



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Maximal voluntary isometric force (MVC) during knee extension at 90° knee joint angle pre (open bars) and post (solid bars) intervention in group UL and group ULRE. Values are means ± SD. *Significant difference from pretest (P < 0.05).

 


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. MVC during knee extension at 120° knee joint angle pre (open bars) and post (solid bars) intervention in group UL and group ULRE. Values are means ± SD. *Significant difference from pretest (P < 0.05).

 


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. MVC during leg press at 90° knee joint pre (open bars) and post (solid bars) intervention in group UL and group ULRE. Values are means ± SD. *Significant difference from pretest (P < 0.05).

 

Electromyography. Although EMG activity was higher (P < 0.05) for the left compared with the right knee extensor muscles after unloading, 60 min of ambulation produced no change (P > 0.05) in either the left (previously unloaded) or the right (previously weight-bearing) limb (Fig. 9).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Electromyogram activity of individual quadriceps muscles, measured during MVC at 120° knee joint angle pre and post 5 wk of unloading. VL, vastus lateralis; RF, rectus femoris; VM, vastus medialis; amb, ambulation. Values are means ± SD. There were no differences (P > 0.05) between any pre- and postvalues.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The main object of this study was to assess the efficacy of a gravity-independent resistance exercise regimen as a countermeasure to muscle and strength loss induced by 5 wk of simulated spaceflight. This was accomplished by employing the unilateral lower limb unloading model as a spaceflight analog and having men and women perform this task with or without concurrent resistance exercise. The results showed that this particular exercise paradigm not only was capable of blunting muscle atrophy but in fact induced a remarkable 8% increase in muscle volume.

We took advantage of a ground-based model that is known to successfully unload the knee extensor and ankle plantar flexor muscle groups (10, 30, 47). The 5-wk intervention produced a nearly 9% decrease in quadriceps muscle volume. The estimated rate of muscle loss (i.e., almost 2% per week) is very similar to what has been reported by our laboratory (10, 30, 44) and others (1, 21, 47) that used this paradigm over 16-42 days and accords with data generated in response to 28-42 days of bed rest (12, 19, 22, 42). Evidently, a difference in atrophic response across plantar flexor (~10-11%) and knee extensor (~9%) muscles was not discernible after 5 wk of unloading. Although these results confirm data obtained after 21-42 days unloading (21, 47), this does not rule out that either muscle is more susceptible than the other to long-duration interventions. Furthermore, the global response also accords with scarce and fragmental spaceflight data (2, 40), albeit there are puzzling reports of an appreciable decrease in VL muscle fiber size after short-term missions. Hence, the 11-24 and 16-36% atrophy reported after 5- or 11-day spaceflight (24) do not corroborate with the very modest whole muscle loss (41) and voluntary force decrement (32) demonstrated in the same crew. If real, these data would also imply a more than threefold greater weekly quadriceps muscle atrophy than that assessed by means of computerized imaging techniques and reported in astronauts after 8- and 17-day spaceflight (2, 40).

The reduction in maximal voluntary force amounted to 24-32% in response to unloading, and this effect was comparable when determined by various measures. Thus the decrement was not different for the one- and two-joint knee extension test modes and similar regardless of knee joint angle. Likewise, previous studies have produced results suggesting that neither the in vivo speed-torque (1, 10, 47) nor the torque-angle relationship (21) shows any prominent alterations after unloading.

Clearly, the decrease in voluntary force could not be accounted for by the decrease in muscle volume only. This disproportionate strength loss is not a novel finding and rather confirms several reports that determined the effects of bed rest (12, 19, 22) or unloading (1, 10, 30, 47) on muscle size and function. Collectively, the present results and those of other studies (15, 21) imply that mechanisms other than reduced skeletal muscle protein synthesis (25, 27) and governing protein loss are also responsible for the compromised in vivo muscle function frequently reported after simulated spaceflight. The main finding of this study, however, was the demonstration of the countermeasures effect induced by a novel resistance exercise paradigm. The robust, 8% increase in quadriceps muscle volume is striking given the brief episodes and limited amount of contractile activity that was imposed on unloaded muscle. The twelve exercise sessions consisted of 28 coupled concentric and eccentric actions each, and <16 min were dedicated to maximal contractile activity over the 5-wk intervention. This equals only 0.03% of the unloading time period. At first, this finding may be surprising. However, athletes emphasizing and relying on grand muscle mass and power typically refrain from voluminous low-intensity exercise and rather employ high-force, low-repetition training strategies. Likewise, analogies can readily be found in the animal kingdom among species characterized by extraordinary speed and power. It is also noteworthy that, after reviewing the literature (49), we found no resistance training study reporting similar or greater quadriceps muscle hypertrophy in healthy young or middle-aged ambulatory subjects in response to programs of comparable duration. However, spinal cord-injured patients who underwent surface electrical stimulation of this muscle twice weekly for 8 wk showed a marked increase in muscle size, at a rate that was even greater than what we report here (20). This raises the question of whether skeletal muscle exposed to minimal activity or loading is more apt to grow in response to a high-tension stimulus challenge compared with muscle that is chronically exposed to low tension, e.g., normal weight bearing.

Although the three vastus muscles showed a rather uniform response, i.e., they decreased ~9 (VI and VL) and 12% (VM), the biarticulate RF showed maintained volume after unloading. Conversely, in group ULRE, the increase in volume of these muscles followed the same hierarchical pattern, i.e., the hypertrophy of VI and VL was 5-6% and VM increased by 9%. The RF muscle enlargement was almost 17%. One might suggest that the absence of atrophy of RF noted here and elsewhere (30) in response to lower limb unloading simply implies failure of the model to prevent use of this muscle. Thus some movement about the hip joint is allowed and brought about in part by RF use. This, however, cannot serve as the sole explanation, because bed rest provokes only minute, if any, atrophy of this muscle (B. A. Alkner and P. A. Tesch, unpublished observations).

Interestingly, ambulatory subjects who carried out the exercise program prescribed here (49) showed an almost identical progress in training load. Parallel to this progression, the increase in quadriceps muscle volume was also substantial, i.e., 6.1%. However, in frank contrast to the response demonstrated in the training group that was subjected to unloading, the ambulatory trainees experienced marked gains in non-task-specific voluntary strength. This apparent discrepancy in response might reflect inability of chronically unloaded muscle to make use of the increased muscle size brought about by resistance exercise, at least initially and on resuming weight bearing. Similar to the results reported here, resistance exercise failed to offset the decrement in non-task-specific force during 2-wk bed rest (5). Combined, this is further evidence that mechanisms other than muscle atrophy only must be responsible for the muscle dysfunction, shown here and elsewhere (1, 10, 12, 15, 21, 30, 44) in response to unloading. Whether this reduced efficiency, in turn, was governed by neural changes, e.g., reduced recruitment as a result of decreased neural drive (15) or by any other means, and/or decreased cross-bridge interaction (45, 50, 51), can only be speculated on.

Previously, it has been reported that a large portion of the decay in maximal voluntary force elicited by 10-28 days of unloading is regained after only a few days of resumed ambulation (10, 15, 21), and this transient effect is accompanied by an appreciable increase in maximal EMG activity. We addressed this issue in the present study and hypothesized that unloading would impair muscle function such that greater neural input would be required to drive the muscle and more muscle to be involved for a given motor task (15, 44); we speculated that acute reambulation, at least partially, would serve to reset this mechanism. Accordingly, after the intervention, the previously unloaded left knee extensors showed greater overall EMG activity than the right weight-bearing limb while sustaining a given submaximal force. However, the standard reloading procedure, consisting of 60 min of walking with progressively increased weight bearing, did not alter knee extensor EMG response to a modest exercise challenge, suggesting that this loading stimulus was insufficient to modulate the neural input required to produce a certain force.

The findings here of a dissociation between muscle and force loss and failure to transform an increase in muscle volume into enhanced non-task-specific voluntary force lend further support to the idea that short-term spaceflight or lack of weight bearing elicits prominent neural adaptations resulting in reduced muscle performance. This in turn suggests that maintaining muscle mass by any means does not necessarily offset the negative effects of spaceflight on neuromuscular function. This is a problem that needs to be addressed in more detail to aid in the development of exercise countermeasures for space travelers.

It should be appreciated that compliance is a major concern or drawback with use of the unilateral lower limb unloading model and critical to the study results and outcome. Given that the triceps surae muscles are unloaded by the present intervention and not involved in the resistance exercise task employed, the finding of no group difference in atrophic response of this particular muscle group was expected. Also, in accordance with previous observations (44) and in support of similar compliance, calf surface temperature and circumference showed comparable responses in the two groups when monitored over the course of interventions. The unloaded limb was consistently 2-3°C cooler and circumference 2-3 cm larger compared with the weight-bearing limb, and the differences across legs were almost identical for the two subject groups. In further support of successful compliance, in neither group did the weight-bearing right knee extensors show altered muscle strength or volume. Hence, we are confident that the goal to induce comparable and near complete or complete unloading response in the two experimental groups was accomplished and that the observed changes in muscle volume after unloading with or without resistance training resulted from net gain and loss of muscle tissue.

Previously, various resistance training programs carried out by individuals subjected to either bed rest or lower limb suspension have been proven effective in mitigating or preventing muscle (3, 4, 47) and strength losses (3, 4, 6, 7, 28, 29, 47). Unfortunately, these studies collectively employed exercise countermeasure aids that used either gravity-dependent weights or systems that failed to offer resistance during eccentric actions. In the present study, resistance training was performed by use of a mechanical, yet gravity-independent, non-electrically powered exercise system that it is capable of providing eccentric overload (49). Although it appears that inclusion of eccentric actions in resistance programs is an important stimulus and crucial in optimizing muscle growth of weight-bearing (30) or unloaded muscle (26, 35), we have no proof that the unique features of the device used amplified the benefits of resistance exercise shown before. An established exercise promoting knee extensor muscle use was chosen. Albeit, the particular exercise configuration (i.e., monoarticulate knee extension) used here is not intended for use by space crew, we believe the results of this study are applicable and reflect efficacy of this loading feature to counteract muscle loss experienced by space travelers.

In conclusion, the present results suggest that muscle atrophy induced by 5 wk of unilateral lower limb unloading is offset by resistive exercise using flywheel technology performed two or three times weekly and calling for maximal effort. In fact, it appears that the potential for exercise-induced muscle hypertrophy is not reduced in chronically unloaded muscle. Hence, resistance exercise not only is capable of blunting the atrophic response but in fact produces marked hypertrophy. This, however, may not necessarily transfer over to parallel changes in neuromuscular performance. Nevertheless, the results of this study add further strong support to earlier reports advocating that resistance exercise should be employed as a countermeasure on extended space missions.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study was supported by grants from National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA Grant 5286; to P. A. Tesch) and the Swedish National Space Board (to P. A. Tesch).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We thank all subjects who endured the 5-wk unloading intervention. The technical support by Dr. Diana Lindquist, Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, is greatly acknowledged.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. A. Tesch, Section for Exercise Physiology, Dept. of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden (E-mail: per.tesch{at}fyfa.ki.se).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Adams GR, Hather BM, and Dudley GA. Effect of short-term un-weighting on human skeletal muscle strength and size. Aviat Space Environ Med 65: 1116-1121, 1994.[Medline]
  2. Akima H, Kawakami Y, Kubo K, Sekiguchi C, Ohshima H, Miyamoto A, and Fukunaga T. Effect of short-duration spaceflight on thigh and leg muscle volume. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32: 1743-1747, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Akima H, Kubo K, Imai M, Kanehisa H, Suzuki Y, Gunji A, and Fukunaga T. Inactivity and muscle: effect of resistance training during bed rest on muscle size in the lower limb. Acta Physiol Scand 172: 269-278, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Akima H, Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Suzuki Y, Gunji A, and Fukunaga T. Leg-press resistance training during 20 days of 6 degrees head-down-tilt bed rest prevents muscle deconditioning. Eur J Appl Physiol 82: 30-38, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Bamman MM and Caruso JE. Resistance exercise countermeasures for space flight: implication of training specificity. J Strength Cond Res 14: 45-49, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Bamman MM, Clarke MS, Feeback DL, Talmadge RJ, Stevens BR, Lieberman SA, and Greenisen MC. Impact of resistance exercise during bed rest on skeletal muscle sarcopenia and myosin isoform distribution. J Appl Physiol 84: 157-163, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bamman MM, Hunter GR, Stevens BR, Guilliams ME, and Greenisen MC. Resistance exercise prevents plantar flexor deconditioning during bed rest. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29: 1462-1468, 1997.[Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Berg HE, Dudley GA, Haggmark T, Ohlsen H, and Tesch PA. Effects of lower limb unloading on skeletal muscle mass and function in humans. J Appl Physiol 70: 1882-1885, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Berg HE, Dudley GA, Hather B, and Tesch PA. Work capacity and metabolic and morphologic characteristics of the human quadriceps muscle in response to unloading. Clin Physiol 13: 337-347, 1993.[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Berg HE, Larsson L, and Tesch PA. Lower limb skeletal muscle function after 6 wk of bed rest. J Appl Physiol 82: 182-188, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Berg HE, Tedner B, and Tesch PA. Changes in lower limb muscle cross-sectional area and tissue fluid volume after transition from standing to supine. Acta Physiol Scand 148: 379-385, 1993.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Berg HE and Tesch PA. A gravity-independent ergometer to be used for resistance training in space. Aviat Space Environ Med 65: 752-756, 1994.[Medline]
  13. Berg HE and Tesch PA. Changes in muscle function in response to 10 days of lower limb unloading in humans. Acta Physiol Scand 157: 63-70, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Berg HE and Tesch PA. Force and power characteristics of a resistive exercise device for use in space. Acta Astronaut 42: 219-230, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Colliander EB and Tesch PA. Effects of eccentric and concentric muscle actions in resistance training. Acta Physiol Scand 140: 31-39, 1990.[Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Conley MS, Foley JM, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Meyer RA, and Dudley GA. Effect of acute head-down tilt on skeletal muscle cross-sectional area and proton transverse relaxation time. J Appl Physiol 81: 1572-1577, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Convertino VA, Doerr DF, Mathes KL, Stein SL, and Buchanan P. Changes in volume, muscle compartment, and compliance of the lower extremities in man following 30 days of exposure to simulated microgravity. Aviat Space Environ Med 60: 653-658, 1989.[Medline]
  18. Dudley GA, Castro MJ, Rogers S, and Apple DF. A simple means of increasing muscle size after spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Eur J Appl Physiol 80: 394-396, 1999.
  19. Dudley GA, Duvoisin MR, Adams GR, Meyer RA, Belew AH, and Buchanan P. Adaptations to unilateral lower limb suspension in humans. Aviat Space Environ Med 63: 678-683, 1992.[Medline]
  20. Dudley GA, Duvoisin MR, Convertino VA, and Buchanan P. Alterations of the in vivo torque-velocity relationship of human skeletal muscle following 30 days exposure to simulated microgravity. Aviat Space Environ Med 60: 659-663, 1989.[Medline]
  21. Dudley GA, Tesch PA, Miller BJ, and Buchanan P. Importance of eccentric actions in performance adaptations to resistance training. Aviat Space Environ Med 62: 543-550, 1991.[Medline]
  22. Edgerton VR, Zhou MY, Ohira Y, Klitgaard H, Jiang B, Bell G, Harris B, Saltin B, Gollnick PD, Roy RR, Day, MK, and Greenisen M. Human fiber size and enzymatic properties after 5 and 11 days of spaceflight. J Appl Physiol 78: 1733-1739, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ferrando AA, Lane HW, Stuart CA, Davis-Street J, and Wolfe RR. Prolonged bed rest decreases skeletal muscle and whole body protein synthesis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 270: E627-E633, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Fluckey JD, Dupont-Versteegden EE, Montague DC, Knox M, Tesch P, Peterson CA, and Gaddy-Kurten D. A rat resistance exercise regimen attenuates losses of musculoskeletal mass during hindlimb suspension. Acta Physiol Scand 176: 293-300, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Gamrin L, Berg HE, Essén P, Tesch PA, Hultman E, Garlick PJ, McNurlan MA, and Wernerman J. The effect of unloading on protein synthesis in human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 163: 369-377, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Germain P, Guell A, and Marini JF. Muscle strength during bedrest with and without muscle exercise as a countermeasure. Eur J Appl Physiol 71: 342-348, 1995.
  27. Greenleaf JE, Bernauer EM, Ertl AC, Bulbulian R, and Bond M. Isokinetic strength and endurance during 30-day 6 degrees head-down bed rest with isotonic and isokinetic exercise training. Aviat Space Environ Med 65: 45-50, 1994.[Medline]
  28. Hather BM, Adams GR, Tesch PA, and Dudley GA. Skeletal muscle responses to lower limb suspension in humans. J Appl Physiol 72: 1493-1498, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Hather BM, Tesch PA, Buchanan P, and Dudley GA. Influence of eccentric actions on skeletal muscle adaptations to resistance training. Acta Physiol Scand 143: 177-185, 1991.[Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Hayes JC, McBrine JJ, Roper ML, Stricklin MD, Siconolfi SF, and Greenisen MC. Effects of space flight on skeletal muscle performance. FASEB J 65: A1770, 1992.
  31. Herbison GJ and Talbot JM. Final Report Phase IV: Research Opportunities in Muscle Atrophy. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Office, 1984. (NASA Contractor Report 3796)
  32. Jackson AS and Pollock ML. Practical assessment of body composition. Phys Sportsmed 13: 76-90, 1985.
  33. Kirby CR, Ryan MJ, and Booth FW. Eccentric exercise training as a countermeasure to non-weight-bearing soleus muscle atrophy. J Appl Physiol 73: 1894-1899, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Komi PV and Buskirk ER. Effect of eccentric and concentric muscle conditioning on tension and electrical activity of human muscle. Ergonomics 15: 417-434, 1972.[Medline]
  35. Koryak YA. Influence of 120-days 6 degrees head-down tilt bed rest on the functional properties of the neuromuscular system in man. Aviat Space Environ Med 69: 766-770, 1998.[Medline]
  36. Kozlovskaya IB, Barmin VA, Stepantsov VI, and Kharitonov NM. Results of studies of motor functions in long-term space flights. Physiologist 33: S1-S3, 1990.[Medline]
  37. Kozlovskaya IB, Kreidich YV, Oganov V, and Koserenko OP. Pathophysiology of motor functions in prolonged manned space flights. Acta Astronaut 8: 1059-1072, 1981.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  38. LeBlanc A, Lin C, Shackelford L, Sinitsyn V, Evans H, Belichenko O, Schenkman B, Kozlovskaya I, Oganov V, Bakulin A, Hedrick T, and Feeback D. Muscle volume, MRI relaxation times (T2), and body composition after spaceflight. J Appl Physiol 89: 2158-2164, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. LeBlanc A, Rowe R, Schneider V, Evans H, and Hedrick T. Regional muscle loss after short duration spaceflight. Aviat Space Environ Med 66: 1151-1154, 1995.[Medline]
  40. LeBlanc AD, Schneider VS, Evans HJ, Pientok C, Rowe R, and Spector E. Regional changes in muscle mass following 17 weeks of bed rest. J Appl Physiol 73: 2172-2178, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Ohira Y, Yoshinaga T, Ohara M, Nonaka I, Yoshioka T, Yamashita-Goto K, Shenkman BS, Kozlovskaya IB, Roy RR, and Edgerton VR. Myonuclear domain and myosin phenotype in human soleus after bed rest with or without loading. J Appl Physiol 87: 1776-1785, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Ploutz-Snyder LL, Tesch PA, Crittenden DJ, and Dudley GA. Effect of unweighting on skeletal muscle use during exercise. J Appl Physiol 79: 168-175, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Riley DA, Bain JL, Thompson JL, Fitts RH, Widrick JJ, Trappe SW, Trappe TA, and Costill DL. Disproportionate loss of thin filaments in human soleus muscle after 17-day bed rest. Muscle Nerve 21: 1280-1289, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  44. Rummel JA, Sawin CF, Michel EL, Buderer MC, and Thornton WT. Exercise and long duration spaceflight through 84 days. J Am Med Womens Assoc 30: 173-187, 1975.
  45. Schulze K, Gallagher P, and Trappe S. Resistance training preserves skeletal muscle function during unloading in humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34: 303-313, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  46. Tesch PA and Berg HE. Resistance training in space. Int J Sports Med 18, Suppl 4: S322-324, 1997.
  47. Tesch PA, Ekberg A, Lindquist D, and Trieschmann JT. Muscle hypertrophy following 5 wk resistance training using a non-gravity dependent exercise system. Acta Physiol Scand 180: 89-98, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  48. Widrick JJ, Knuth ST, Norenberg KM, Romatowski JG, Bain JL, Riley DA, Karhanek M, Trappe SW, Trappe TA, Costill DL, and Fitts RH. Effect of a 17 day spaceflight on contractile properties of human soleus muscle fibres. J Physiol 516: 915-930, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Widrick JJ, Romatowski JG, Bain JL, Trappe SW, Trappe TA, Thompson JL, Costill DL, Riley DA, and Fitts RH. Effect of 17 days of bed rest on peak isometric force and unloaded shortening velocity of human soleus fibers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 273: C1690-C1699, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. Trappe, D. Costill, P. Gallagher, A. Creer, J. R. Peters, H. Evans, D. A. Riley, and R. H. Fitts
Exercise in space: human skeletal muscle after 6 months aboard the International Space Station
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2009; 106(4): 1159 - 1168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. A. Tesch, F. von Walden, T. Gustafsson, R. M. Linnehan, and T. A. Trappe
Skeletal muscle proteolysis in response to short-term unloading in humans
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2008; 105(3): 902 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
C. Scheele, A. R. Nielsen, T. B. Walden, D. A. Sewell, C. P. Fischer, R. J. Brogan, N. Petrovic, O. Larsson, P. A. Tesch, K. Wennmalm, et al.
Altered regulation of the PINK1 locus: a link between type 2 diabetes and neurodegeneration?
FASEB J, November 1, 2007; 21(13): 3653 - 3665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. M. Haus, J. A. Carrithers, C. C. Carroll, P. A. Tesch, and T. A. Trappe
Contractile and connective tissue protein content of human skeletal muscle: effects of 35 and 90 days of simulated microgravity and exercise countermeasures
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): R1722 - R1727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. D. de Boer, C. N. Maganaris, O. R. Seynnes, M. J. Rennie, and M. V. Narici
Time course of muscular, neural and tendinous adaptations to 23 day unilateral lower-limb suspension in young men
J. Physiol., September 15, 2007; 583(3): 1079 - 1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. Rittweger, K. Winwood, O. Seynnes, M. de Boer, D. Wilks, R. Lea, M. Rennie, and M. Narici
Bone loss from the human distal tibia epiphysis during 24 days of unilateral lower limb suspension
J. Physiol., November 15, 2006; 577(1): 331 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. D. Reeves, C. N. Maganaris, G. Ferretti, and M. V. Narici
Influence of 90-day simulated microgravity on human tendon mechanical properties and the effect of resistive countermeasures
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 2278 - 2286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
F. Haddad, K. M. Baldwin, and P. A. Tesch
Pretranslational markers of contractile protein expression in human skeletal muscle: effect of limb unloading plus resistance exercise
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2005; 98(1): 46 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/4/1451    most recent
01051.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (37)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tesch, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ekberg, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tesch, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ekberg, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Physiological Society.