|
|
||||||||
1Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0022; and 2Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Medical Molecular Biology, Karl-Franzens University, Graz, A-8010 GRAZ, Austria
Submitted 3 January 2003 ; accepted in final form 30 July 2003
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
16HB14ocells; epithelial lining fluid
Nonetheless, HOCl and chloramines can also profoundly influence the function of living cells without directly causing cell death. Indeed, this can include influencing or even stimulating signal transduction. Specific reported effects include 1) disruption of tight junctions (52), 2) increased transepithelial Cl secretion (32), 3) basolateral K+ channel activation (12), and 4) activation of mitogen-activated signal transduction pathways (30). This strongly suggests that HOCl and chloramines, which share some of the chemical attributes of H2O2, likely mimic the now well-established ability of H2O2 to act as a second messenger (15).
The epithelial lining fluid (ELF) bathing the epithelial surface of the lung normally contains a high concentration of reduced glutathione (GSH; 200400 µM) compared with most other extracellular compartments (6, 40). Several reactions of GSH with HOCl lead to products that are either innocuous or far less reactive than HOCl. Reaction of GSH occurs with HOCl through both radical and nonradical pathways, resulting in the formation of GSH disulfide (GSSG), GSH thiolsulfonate, and GSH sulfonamide (which is presumably formed from GSH sulfonate by an internal condensation) (9, 33, 55). Surprisingly, GSSG, which is not a potent scavenger of HOCl, does protect some enzymes against inactivation by HOCl, although only those with critical sites that react more slowly with HOCl than does GSSG (10). Because GSH is the major substance present in the extracellular fluid that can eliminate HOCl, a constitutive decrease in GSH ELF content would be predisposed to inflammation, whereas a decrease in GSH during inflammation could exacerbate injury.
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a common autosomal recessive disease affecting
1 in 2,000 Caucasians (29). The genetic basis of CF has been known for over 10 yr (34). The defective gene codes for an epithelial anion channel named CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) (34). Intestinal, pancreatic, sweat duct, vas deferens, and lung function are all compromised in CF. However, pulmonary disease accounts for most (
90%) of the mortality (29). Specifically, the airways of CF patients undergo chronic recurrent bacterial infection, and many are eventually colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These bacterial incursions evoke a neutrophil-mediated inflammatory response (23). MPO and HOCl are found in significant quantities in the sputum of CF patients showing symptoms (44). Although this HOCl would be expected to consume GSH, total GSH equivalents (GSH + 2 x GSSG) are reduced approximately twofold in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from CF patients (36), which suggests that the lower GSH is caused by other factors in addition to consumption by HOCl. Supporting this, transgenic CF mice with defective CFTR also have decreased GSH in the absence of lung inflammation (47). During the past few years, several articles have appeared indicating that a defect in CFTR causes a decrease in GSH secretion to the apical surface of CF cells. This appears to be due to both a loss of conductance of GSH through normal CFTR (22, 26) and a decrease in chloride transportlinked GSH secretion independent of CFTR (16, 17). Thus, in CF, damage due to the production of HOCl is likely exacerbated by the defective GSH secretion.
In the present study, we examined the effects of HOCl on 16HBE14o bronchial epithelial cells, a model for airway epithelium, by bolus addition or by generation with glucose oxidase plus MPO. The aims were to 1) determine what effect acute apical HOCl addition or generation has on the properties of cultured human bronchial epithelial cells and 2) quantify the efficacy of extracellular GSH within the physiological range in protecting human bronchial epithelial cells from HOCl exposure.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Epithelial voltage clamp. These methods are described in detail in our laboratory's previous reports (5, 16, 18). Briefly, small Transwell filter inserts (area = 0.4 cm2) containing 16HBE14o cells were mounted in modified water-jacketed Ussing chambers (Jim's Instrument Manufacturing, Iowa City, IA). Monolayers were bathed on both sides with a Krebs PBS (K-PBS) solution containing (in mM) 144 NaCl, 8.5 Na2HPO4, 5 KCl, 5 D-glucose, 1.4 NaH2PO4, 1.3 CaCl2, and 1 MgCl2 (pH = 7.4). The volume of both solutions was 6 ml. Unless otherwise specified, all chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma Chemical. HEPES was not used as a pH buffer because it is expected to react with HOCl and form a cell-impermeable chloramine derivative (42). Apical and basolateral bath solutions were oxygenated and stirred with room air via gas lifts, and temperature was maintained at 37°C throughout an experiment. The potential difference across a monolayer was voltage clamped by using a Physiologic Instruments VCC-600 (San Diego, CA), which provided measures of the transepithelial resistance (Rt) and short-circuit current (Isc). These data were recorded continuously by using a strip chart (BD 112 Kipp & Zonen, Delft, Holland). We tested for effects of continual exposure to HOCl by adding MPO (1 U/ml, Calbiochem) plus glucose oxidase (GO; 10 mU/ml) to the apical bath. This enzymatic system is expected to generate H2O2 (and thereafter HOCl) at an initial rate of 1 µM/min. As MPO becomes inactivated over time, the rate of HOCl production will decline as it would for stimulated neutrophils. In other experiments, we added HOCl directly to apical bath solutions. Paired nontreated monolayers served as controls in both paradigms. The ionic basis for Isc was determined by adding apical amiloride to block Na+ absorption or basolateral bumetanide to block Cl secretion, as described in previous studies (5, 18). All compounds were as a small volume of concentrated stock solutions in water or phosphate buffer.
GSH efflux assay. The experimental design used to measure apical GSH accumulation was generally similar to previous reports (16, 17). Transwell or Falcon filter inserts (24-mm diameter) containing confluent 16HBE14o monolayers (300600
cm2) were placed in six-well clusters and bathed on both sides with warmed K-PBS (37°C). The volume of fluid above the cells for these measurements was 0.5 ml. The solutions contained acivicin (2 mg/ml) to prevent GSH hydrolysis by
-glutamyl transpeptidase. Monolayers were maintained in an incubator at 37°C in the presence of room air during the 3-h experimental period. Previously, our laboratory showed that GSH efflux from CFT1 CF airway cells depended on the apical Cl conductance and that increasing the basolateral K+ conductance by adding chlorzoxazone further potentiated GSH secretion (16). Because 16HBE14o cells express CFTR (8), we added forskolin (10 µM, Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) or forskolin plus chlorzoxazone (500 µM) to determine the effects on GSH efflux. Untreated monolayers served as controls. Small volumes (50 µl) of the apical and basolateral solutions were sampled and replaced with identical solutions at defined intervals. At the end of the experiment, the cells were lysed by using ice-cold 0.1% Triton X-100 in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH = 7.4). Computations were performed in Excel, and data were corrected to account for the sample and to replace paradigm. Results were compared by using Student's t-test or ANOVA depending on the number of comparisons. Differences were considered statistically significant if P < 0.05.
We measured GSH equivalents (GSH + 2 GSSG) by using an enzymatic-recycling assay (43) adapted for a microtiter plate reader (2). Samples were mixed with an equal volume of 10% (wt/vol) sulfosalicylic acid and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min at 0°C to remove precipitated materials. The resulting supernatants were neutralized with 33% (vol/vol) triethanolamine (100:22.5). Standards containing known amounts of GSH were prepared by using identical solutions and protocols. The assay was performed by pipetting 20 µl of samples, standards, or blanks into wells containing 30 µl of 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer. We then added 50 µl of a solution containing 4 mM diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid, 2 U/ml GSH reductase, and 0.8 mM NADPH in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH = 7.4) to each well. The recycling reaction was initiated by adding 100 µl of 1.2 mM DTNB in sodium phosphate buffer, the plate was immediately placed in a microplate reader, and the rate of DTNB reduction was monitored at 412 nm.
Staining for HOCl-modified protein. Surface targets modified by HOCl were immunostained by methods similar to those used to localized CFTR in a previous study (5) using an antibody raised against HOCl-modified protein. Briefly, 16HBE14o cells were grown on 24-mm transparent filter inserts (Falcon or Costar). Filters containing confluent monolayers (300600
cm2) were placed into 6-well plates and washed on both sides with warmed K-PBS (37°C). MPO (20 U/ml) plus GO (200 mU/ml) were then added to the 1 mM apical K-PBS solutions. Because HOCl reacts irreversibly, it is important to keep the ratio of oxidant to cell mass relatively constant. Thus we added 20-fold more MPO and GO compared with Ussing chamber experiments to partly compensate for the 6-fold lower bath volume plus the 12-fold increase in filter area. The treated and control monolayers were incubated in a warmed incubator (37°C) containing room air for the duration of the experimental treatment (8 h). We periodically monitored the Rt by using chopstick electrodes (World Precision Instruments) to ensure that the outcomes of the Isc and staining procedures were comparable. At the end of an experiment, monolayers were fixed in ice-cold methanol and postfixed in 3% formaldehyde in Dulbecco's PBS. We used a primary monoclonal antibody raised against HOCl-modified low-density lipoprotein (28). This antibody (clone 6E10E11) is specific for HOCl-modified lipoprotein, as demonstrated by Western and immunoblotting analyses (28). The monolayers were also stained for CFTR by using a polyclonal antibody that was kindly provided by Dr. David Bedwell (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL). The specificity of this antibody was previously confirmed by immunoprecipitation (5). Secondary antibodies labeled with Texas red X or Oregon green were purchased from Molecular Probes. Nuclei were counterstained with bisbenzimide H33258
[GenBank]
. Confocal florescence microscopy and image analysis was performed as described previously (5).
Western blot analysis. Protein carbonyls were detected by reaction with dinitrophenyl hydrazine and subsequent Western blot analysis for dinitrophenol incorporation by using standard methods (25). Briefly, 16HBE14o monolayers cultured on 24-mm-diameter permeable inserts were treated with apical HOCl (1 mM) in 1 ml of apical K-PBS for 1 h in the presence or absence of GSH (0, 25, 250 µM). Accounting for 70-fold difference in the oxidant-to-cell ratios, 1 mM HOCl corresponds to addition of 14 µM in an Ussing chamber experiment. Cells were then washed and collected by scraping. Cell extracts were obtained by sonication in a lysis buffer containing (in mM) 20 Tris · HCl, 150 NaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, 2.5 EDTA, 2.5 EGTA, and 1 PMSF, plus 10 µg/ml aprotinin. The protein carbonyls in the extracts were derivatized by reaction with dinitrophenyl hydrazine (25). Proteins were then separated by SDS-PAGE. The extract was mixed with 1 volume of 2x DTT gel loading buffer (0.125 M Tris · HCl, pH 6.5, 20% glycerol, 4% SDS, 0.0025% pyronin Y, and 15.4 mg/ml of DL-DTT) and applied to 10% SDS-PAGE. After electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk at room temperature for 30 min and incubated with an anti-dinitrophenol IgE (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL) as the primary antibody at 4°C overnight. After membranes were washed, they were treated with goat antimouse antibody tagged with horseradish peroxidase at room temperature for 1 h and then with an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; ECL Plus) reagent mixture for 5 min. Film exposure was carried out at room temperature by using Hyperfilm ECL film (Amersham).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Figure 1B compares apical GSH accumulation from 16HBE14o monolayers treated with forskolin (10 µM) or forskolin plus chlorzoxazone (500 µM) compared with control (nontreated). There was a basal rate of apical GSH accumulation that was increased 1.7-fold by forskolin over the 4-h interval studied (P < 0.05 compared with control). In contrast to previous observations using CFT1 cells (16), chlorzoxazone did not appear to markedly potentate the forskolin-stimulated GSH efflux from 16HBE14o cells. These results are not entirely unexpected, because chlorzoxazone has previously been shown to activate both apical CFTR and basolateral K+ channels in non-CF epithelial cells (38). Thus the precise effect of chlorzoxazone on membrane voltage is difficult to predict in non-CF cells and requires additional study. More importantly, these data demonstrate that increased CFTR channel activity in human bronchial epithelial cells by forskolin addition enhanced GSH accumulation in the apical media. These data are in agreement with our laboratory's previous studies showing that either CFTR expression or increased anion permeability using a Cl channel-forming peptide enhanced net GSH transport from CF airway (CFT1) cells (16, 17) and provides new evidence that alterations in intracellular cAMP can regulate GSH secretion acutely from normal airway epithelial cells.
Apical HOCl generation markedly decreased Rt, and GSH was protective. HOCl is highly reactive and unstable at pH 7.4. Therefore, we used an enzyme system consisting of MPO (1 U/ml) plus GO (10 mU/ml) to determine the effects of a more prolonged exposure to low levels of HOCl. MPO catalyzes the formation of HOCl by using the GO-generated H2O2 plus chloride. The rate of hydrogen peroxide production by 10 mU/ml GO is expected to be rate limiting for HOCl production and is
1 µM/min (45), although this will decline with time due to inactivation of the MPO. We observed that MPO plus GO caused a marked decline in Rt over 3 h, as summarized in Fig. 2. Figure 2A shows the Rt before treatment (n = 3). Figure 2B depicts the Rt 3 h after treatment. The resistances of MPO, GO, and untreated monolayers all declined less than twofold during the experimental period. Interesting, H2O2 generation alone (i.e., GO) had no effect. Addition of MPO plus GO caused the Rt to decrease to a very low value (28
cm2), which is similar to the resistance of the filter support (10 ± 5
cm2). GSH (25 µM) slowed the effect of MPO + GO, and Rt was 165
cm2 after 3 h. Figure 3 shows that GO + MPO produced significant surface protein modification in 16HBE14o cells, as demonstrated by immunostaining with an antibody raised against HOCl-modified protein. This result is an expected effect of HOCl, and these data serve to validate the MPO + GO enzymatic system.
|
|
Bolus HOCl addition decreased Rt and caused a rapid increase in Isc. Figure 4, shows representative records comparing the Isc and Rt responses to addition of 10 or 50 µM HOCl. The mixed Na-H form of HOCl was added as the acidic dissociation constant of HOCl is in the neutral range (
7.0). Sodium hypochlorite is stable, but when added to a buffer at pH 7.4, the HOCl formed will begin to rapidly decompose (37). Addition of 50 µM HOCl decreased Rt, which is consistent with the data shown previously by using MPO + GO (Fig. 2). Somewhat unexpectedly, however, 50 µM HOCl also evoked a rapid increase in Isc. The stimulated current was abolished by the K+ channel blocker clotrimazole (100 µM) as shown. Basolateral bumetanide (100 µM) blocked a portion of the HOCl-stimulated current, whereas apical amiloride (100 µM) was without effect (data not shown). Thus the Isc response was due at least in part to Cl secretion. The ability of 50 µM but not 10 µM HOCl to enhance Isc and decrease Rt is suggestive of steep dose-response relations. This was indeed the case, as shown in the bottom panels. These data were poorly described by either Michaelis-Menten functions or Hill plots, and the curves were drawn from spline fits (SigmaPlot 5.0).
|
The fact that HOCl acts irreversibly also raises an important caveat regarding the interpretation of these data. Specifically, the response is predicted to depend on the HOCl mass (i.e., concentration x bath volume) and the cell mass (i.e., monolayer area). In this regard, preliminary experiments (n = 4) showed that 50 µM HOCl was completely ineffective when added to monolayers grown on slightly larger format filters (0.6 cm2), which is the expected result.
GSH protected monolayers from apical HOCl addition. Figure 5A presents representative current records, which show that 50 µM GSH was effective in preventing the Isc response to a bolus HOCl initially at 100 µM. One monolayer was treated with 50 µM apical GSH. The second paired monolayer was not treated and served as a control. Addition of 100 µM HOCl to the apical bath of both monolayers evoked a Isc response from only the untreated control. These data are representative of four paired experiments. Figure 5B is a Western blot showing that protein carbonyls were formed after addition of 1 mM HOCl and that that carbonyl formation was also decreased by addition of GSH (25 or 250 µM). There were a number of proteins that were susceptible to carbonyl formation, which is consistent with known effects of HOCl (45). It is also important to note that 250 µM GSH is within the physiological concentration range in the ELF (6, 40).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies also demonstrated that H2O2 increased anion secretion across cultured intestinal and airway epithelial cells at slightly lower concentrations (i.e., 0.51 mM) (7, 12). This effect was mediated partly by increases in the basolateral K+ conductance and in CFTR-mediated apical membrane anion permeability (7). Data presented herein also implicate activation of the basolateral K+ conductance (Fig. 4). Specifically addition of HOCl increased Isc across 16HBE14o monolayers (Fig. 4). This Isc response was similar to the effect of the K+ channel opener chlorzoxazone (18, 38) and was unlike the response to the cAMP-mediated agonist forskolin (see Fig. 1). The basolateral K+ conductance regulates mass and charge balance and plays a key role in vectorial transport (48). It is also possible that HOCl increased apical CFTR channel activity, but testing this possibility is beyond the scope of the present study.
It is unlikely that HOCl affects the basolateral K+ channels by direct modification because it has been shown to dissipate entirely at or near the apical cell surface due to its highly reactive nature (45). Thus there are two possible explanations for the chlorzoxazone-like effects of HOCl on Isc. First, HOCl may react with amines to form reactive chloramines that are longer lived and are able to act at a distance from their site of generation. There is precedence for this explanation because HOCl-generated chloramines have recently been shown to increase Cl secretion across intestinal epithelial cells via an enhanced basolateral K+ conductance (39). A second possibility is that either HOCl and/or chloramines, which share some of the chemical attributes of H2O2, alter intracellular signal transduction pathways (15). There is also precedence for this explanation since previous studies showed that oxidant-mediated increases in paracellular permeability in other cell lines could be blocked by addition of cytokines or protein kinase C inhibitors (3, 4, 49). Low concentrations of HOCl (1020 µM) have also been shown to activate mitogen-activated signal transduction pathways (30). In summary, it is likely that the effects of HOCl are mediated at least in part by a secondary mechanism that is related to chloramine formation and/or intracellular signal transduction. 16HBE14o cells appear to respond similarly to oxidants as other epithelial cells and will provide a convenient model to address these possibilities in future studies.
GSH secretion from airway epithelial monolayers. Previously, we showed that GSH secretion into the ELF depends on the apical membrane Cl permeability by using the CFT1 CF tracheal cell line (16, 17). The cAMP-mediated agonist forskolin had no effect on GSH efflux from CFT1 airway epithelial cells that lacked CFTR. An increase in anion permeability via CFTR transfection or addition of a channel-forming peptide enhanced apical GSH accumulation. Herein, we show that normal human bronchial epithelial cells are also capable of GSH secretion in vitro and that the cAMP-mediated agonist forskolin enhanced apical GSH accumulation. Because forskolin was previously shown to increase apical CFTR channel activity in 16HBE14o cells, (54) the ability of forskolin to enhance GSH secretion acutely extends our previous observations that apical anion permeability indirectly regulates GSH secretion.
Furthermore, the GSH accumulated in the apical bathing solutions over 3 h compares favorably with the 100400 µM of GSH measured in the ELF (6, 40). The 0.5-cm3 volume of fluid used to bathe the 4.2-cm2 cell monolayer (i.e., 1.2-mm fluid depth) is
60- to 80-fold larger than the 15- to 21-µm layer of fluid observed in cultured primary airway epithelial cells (21). Correcting for the increased volume in our experiments, the GSH concentrations after 3 h are calculated to be 5172 µM under basal conditions, 84118 µM in the presence of forskolin, and 97136 µM with forskolin plus chlorzoxazone. These secretion rates indicate that the GSH in the airway ELF is capable of turning over every 312 h. The rates will be lower if GSH transport is substrate limited, but they may also be higher because GSH synthesis was limited by the absence of cysteine, glutamate, and glycine in the K-PBS solutions.
Exogenous GSH is efficient in blocking the effects of HOCl on airway cells. Consistent with the role of GSH as an antioxidant, we demonstrate that addition of GSH to apical fluid protects against HOCl-induced changes in Rt, Isc, and protein carbonyl formation. The reactions of GSH and HOCl are well described (see above). GSH is a relatively small molecule and reacts efficiently with HOCl to form innocuous products. Importantly, this study demonstrates that relatively small decreases in extracellular GSH concentration can markedly reduce the protection against HOCl generation as demonstrated by the extremely steep dose response relations shown in Fig. 4. We have also demonstrated that the apical fluid present in air-liquid cultures alone was able to block the effect of bolus HOCl addition (data not shown). Although there is evidence to suggest that this fluid may contain additional antioxidants including uric acid and proteins (46), these demonstrate the effectiveness of the endogenous extracellular defense against oxidant-mediated injury.
Relevance to CF airway disease. Finally these data demonstrate the potential for GSH antioxidant therapy for CF (20). Recently, the use of GSH aerosol has been suggested to suppress inflammatory cell-derived oxidants in the lungs of CF patients (35). Presently, two clinical trials of aerosolized GSH are underway in Utah and Germany. Unfortunately, GSH administered by this route has been shown to rapidly oxidize to GSSG (35), which is far less efficient in converting HOCl to innocuous products compared with GSH. In addition, delivery of GSH to the interface between the neutrophils and the epithelium will be achieved most effectively by direct secretion from the epithelial cells. Therefore, our goal is to increase apical GSH content where it is most needed. There are two potential strategies. First, we can use the peptide N-K4-M2GlyR to bypass the Cl permeability defect in CF and enhance GSH secretion (16). Second, we can identify the GSH transport protein(s) and pharmacologically target the mechanism that regulates GSH secretion. Restoration of GSH secretion by either of these approaches can lead to a potential clinical application for treatment against damage due to oxidative stress during chronic inflammation in CF patients.
| DISCLOSURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Present address of J. Girón-Calle: Departamento de Fisiología y Tecnología de Productos Vegetales Instituto de la Grasa, CSIC Avenida Padre García Tejero 4, 41012, Sevilla, Spain.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. J. Day Glutathione: A Radical Treatment for Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease? Chest, January 1, 2005; 127(1): 12 - 14. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Day, A. M. van Heeckeren, E. Min, and L. W. Velsor Role for Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Protein in a Glutathione Response to Bronchopulmonary Pseudomonas Infection Infect. Immun., April 1, 2004; 72(4): 2045 - 2051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Griese, J. Ramakers, A. Krasselt, V. Starosta, S. van Koningsbruggen, R. Fischer, F. Ratjen, B. Mullinger, R. M. Huber, K. Maier, et al. Improvement of Alveolar Glutathione and Lung Function but Not Oxidative State in Cystic Fibrosis Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2004; 169(7): 822 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |