Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 95: 1575-1583, 2003. First published June 27, 2003; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00482.2003
8750-7587/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/4/1575    most recent
00482.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iwasaki, K.-i.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iwasaki, K.-i.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, B. D.

Dose-response relationship of the cardiovascular adaptation to endurance training in healthy adults: how much training for what benefit?

Ken-ichi Iwasaki,1,2 Rong Zhang,1 Julie H. Zuckerman,1 and Benjamin D. Levine1

1Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital, and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75231; and 2Department of Hygiene, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan 173-8610

Submitted 7 May 2003 ; accepted in final form 20 June 2003


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Occupational or recreational exercise reduces mortality from cardiovascular disease. The potential mechanisms for this reduction may include changes in blood pressure (BP) and autonomic control of the circulation. Therefore, we conducted the present long-term longitudinal study to quantify the dose-response relationship between the volume and intensity of exercise training, and regulation of heart rate (HR) and BP. We measured steady-state hemodynamics and analyzed dynamic cardiovascular regulation by spectral and transfer function analysis of cardiovascular variability in 11 initially sedentary subjects during 1 yr of progressive endurance training sufficient to allow them to complete a marathon. From this, we found that 1) moderate exercise training for 3 mo decreased BP, HR, and total peripheral resistance, and increased cardiovascular variability and arterial baroreflex sensitivity; 2) more prolonged and intense training did not augment these changes further; and 3) most of these changes returned to control values at 12 mo despite markedly increased training duration and intensity equivalent to that routinely observed in competitive athletes. In conclusion, increases in R-wave-R-wave interval and cardiovascular variability indexes are consistent with an augmentation of vagal modulation of HR after exercise training. It appears that moderate doses of training for 3 mo are sufficient to achieve this response as well as a modest hypotensive effect from decreasing vascular resistance. However, more prolonged and intense training does not necessarily lead to greater enhancement of circulatory control and, therefore, may not provide an added protective benefit via autonomic mechanisms against death by cardiovascular disease.

blood pressure; exercise; Fourier analysis; heart rate; nervous system; autonomic


NUMEROUS EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES provide strong evidence that occupational or recreational exercise reduces mortality from cardiovascular disease (13). However, the "dose" of exercise, i.e., the intensity, duration, and frequency of training required to achieve and optimize this response, remains uncertain. For example, many investigators have argued that moderate-intensity exercise training is sufficient to produce substantial benefits (26). In contrast, others have argued that high-intensity training produces proportionally greater responses (51).

One possible pathway by which exercise reduces cardiovascular mortality may be through modification of conventional risk factors, such as hypertension (11), dyslipidemia (40), or glucose intolerance (19). However, it may take years of sustained exercise training to alter cholesterol levels (23), and these changes are at best only modest (46). Yet the effect of exercise training in patients at highest risk for cardiovascular events is manifest early, i.e., within the first few months after a myocardial infarction (22). Moreover, for such patients, exercise training reduces the risk of sudden death but has a limited impact on recurrent myocardial infarction (34), suggesting a greater effect on dynamic cardiovascular control processes than on slowly developing arteriosclerosis.

Therefore, this long-term longitudinal study of progressive endurance training was conducted to quantify the dose-response relationship between the intensity and amount of exercise training and regulation of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP).


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects. Eleven initially sedentary men (n = 6) and women (n = 5), age 29 ± 6 yr, were studied. Subjects were excluded if they exercised for >30 min/day more than once per week. No subject smoked, used recreational drugs, or had significant chronic medical problems. Subjects were screened with a history and physical examination that including ECG and echocardiogram. All subjects signed a consent form approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Presbyterian Hospital. All subjects were experienced and comfortable with all laboratory techniques in this study.

Exercise training. HR at maximal steady state (MSS) and peak oxygen uptake (O2) were determined by analysis of gas exchange obtained during incremental treadmill tests performed every 3 mo. MSS was estimated from the ventilatory threshold according to standard criteria (3). On the basis of the MSS HR and peak HR, five training zones were determined (Table 1). Table 2 is a template of workouts prescribed over the 12 mo of the training program. The majority of training sessions, particularly during the early phases of the program, were prescribed as "base training," with target HRs equivalent to ~75-85% of maximal. Initially subjects trained three to four times per week for 30-45 min/session by either brisk walking or slow jogging. As the subjects became fitter, the duration of the base training sessions was prolonged, including the addition of one "long run" per week. Subsequently, sessions of increased intensity (MSS or interval sessions) were added first once, then twice, and occasionally three times per week, and were always followed by recovery sessions. By the end of the year, subjects were exercising for 7-9 h/wk, including long runs of up to 3 h, plus regular interval sessions on the track and races. This template served as a minimum amount of exercise required of all the subjects and provided a periodized training program (Fig. 1) similar to those routinely used by competitive athletes (50). A sample training schedule over 12 mo is provided in the APPENDIX.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Example of 5 training zones

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Template of workouts prescribed over a 1-yr training program

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Intensity and duration of training, as quantified by the training impulse (TRIMP) index during the year of training. The solid horizontal line represents the monthly TRIMP that is equivalent to those observed in competitive athletes [~85% maximal heart rate (HR), 300 min/wk]. The horizontal dashed line represents the monthly TRIMP that is equivalent to a typical cardiac rehabilitation program (~75% maximal HR, 140 min/wk). Arrows indicate when experiments were performed (before training and 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo after the start of training).

 

To quantify the training stimulus, we used the method of Banister et al. (4) for the calculation of the training impulse (TRIMP). This method multiplies the duration of a training session by the average HR achieved during that session, weighted for exercise intensity. Thus exercise sessions of longer duration and/or higher intensity, such as interval workouts, are assigned relatively higher TRIMP values than sessions of lower intensity (see APPENDIX).

O2. An individualized treadmill protocol was used to determine peak exercise capacity. During initial familiarization sessions, a comfortable jogging speed was determined for each subject (generally 5-8 miles/h). This constant speed was used for each subsequent test, with the grade increased by 2% every 2 min until exhaustion. Measures of ventilatory gas exchange were made by using the Douglas bag technique. Gas fractions were analyzed by mass spectrometry (Marquette MGA1100), and ventilatory volume was measured by a dry-gas meter (Collins). Maximal oxygen uptake (O2 max) was defined as the highest O2 measured from at least a 40-s Douglas bag. In nearly all cases, a plateau in O2 was observed with increasing work rate, confirming the identifi-cation of O2 max. In addition, HR was monitored continuously via ECG (Polar).

MSS. During the incremental test of O2 max, breath-by-breath O2 was calculated and displayed on-line by using gas fractions measured at the mouth by mass spectrometry (Marquette MGA1100), and minute ventilation (E) was measured by a turbine flow meter (VMM, Interface Associates). The ventilatory threshold for all tests was determined by a single, blinded, observer during simultaneous examination of multiple plots of O2 vs. E, O2 vs. E/O2, O2 vs. CO2 production, and O2 vs. E/CO2 production by using commercial software (First Breath, Marquette). The HR at the work rate that elicited the ventilatory threshold was identified and used to determine training zones in Table 1.

Protocol. Experiments were performed before and 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo after the start of training, in the morning at least 2 h after a light breakfast and >12 h after the last caffeinated or alcoholic beverage was consumed, in a quiet laboratory at 25°C. No high-intensity training sessions were allowed within 48-72 h of testing.

All measurements were made supine, after at least 30 min of quiet rest. An analog ECG was obtained, and beat-by-beat arterial BP was obtained at the finger by photoplethysmography (Finapres, Ohmeda) (38). Intermittent BP was measured in the arm by electrosphygmomanometry (Suntech) with a microphone placed over the brachial artery and the detection of Korotkoff sounds gated to the ECG (33). Cardiac output was measured with a modification of the foreign gas rebreathing method by using acetylene as the soluble and helium as the insoluble gas (47). Resting stroke volume and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were then calculated from HR and BP (electrosphygmomanometry) measured at the same time. After the establishment of resting, hemodynamic steady state (~30 min of repeated measurements until sequential cardiac output measurements within 500 ml), 6 min of data, including beat-by-beat arterial pressure and ECG, were recorded during spontaneous respiration. Subjects were then asked to control their respiratory frequency at a fixed rate of 12 breaths/min (0.20 Hz) by following a graph on a computer. After a 2-min adjustment period, 6 min of data were recorded again. The data from the spontaneous breathing portion of the protocol were used to determine mean values for HR, R-wave-R-wave (R-R) interval, systolic BP (SBP), and diastolic BP; the data from the fixed breathing protocol were used for spectral and transfer function analysis.

Spectral and transfer function analysis. The analog ECG and arterial pressure were analyzed as previously reported (21). High-frequency (0.15 to ~0.30 Hz) and low-frequency (0.05 to ~0.15 Hz) power of R-R interval and SBP were calculated from the integration of the autospectra (Fig. 2). These values at each specified frequency range were also normalized by dividing by the total spectral power (36). This data acquisition and processing strategy conforms to consensus panel recommendations for the assessment of cardiovascular variability (45a).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Representative frequency-domain analysis of changes in R-wave-R-wave (R-R) interval and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in a subject before and after 3 mo exercise training. A: power spectral density (PSD) of SBP. B: PSD of R-R interval. C: transfer-function gain between systolic blood pressure and R-R interval.

 

The transfer function gain, phase, and coherence between SBP and R-R interval were estimated by using the cross-spectral method (21, 41) (Fig. 2). The low- (Gain LF) and high-frequency transfer function gain (Gain HF), phase, and coherence were estimated as mean values in the same frequency ranges as above. The transfer function gain between changes in the SBP and R-R interval was used to reflect baroreflex function (41). The assumption of linearity and reliability of the transfer function estimation was evaluated by the coherence, which ranges between 0 and 1.

Statistics. Variables were compared by using one-way ANOVA in conjunction with the Duncan post hoc test for multiple comparisons (n = 11). A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. To express the dose-response relationship between the exercise stimulus and changes in cardiovascular indexes, correlations between the monthly TRIMP and cardiovascular index at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo were estimated from a second-order regression (ABstat, Anderson Bell). Data are presented as means ± SE.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
All subjects successfully completed a marathon (n = 9), triathlon (n = 1), or 100-mile endurance cycling race (n = 1) as the ultimate performance goal of the training program. O2 max increased at 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo of training compared with baseline (Table 3). Body weight and respiratory rate did not change during training (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Subject characteristics and hemodynamics during training

 

Steady-state hemodynamics. Compared with baseline, HR decreased significantly (R-R interval increased significantly), and stroke volume increased significantly at 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo of training (Fig. 3). SBP and diastolic BP decreased after 3 mo of training (Fig. 3). This reduction in BP remained unchanged up to 9 mo, despite continued and augmented training. BP returned to pretraining levels at the end of the training program (P < 0.05 compared with 9 mo). This pattern was similar regardless of whether BP was measured by averaging 6 min of quiet resting beat-by-beat data or from automated cuff measurements (Table 3).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Dose-response relationship between exercise intensity (monthly TRIMP) and static cardiovascular indexes. The vertical dotted line represents the monthly TRIMP that is equivalent to typical cardiac rehabilitation program. SV, stroke volume (A); DBP, diastolic blood pressure (D); TPR, total peripheral resistance (E); SDR-R, standard deviation of R-R intervals (F). B: R-R; C: SBP. *P < 0.05 compared with pretraining baseline.

 

Cardiac output increased, and TPR decreased (Fig. 3) significantly at 3, 6, and 9 mo of training. Paralleling the changes in BP, TPR returned to near control levels at 12 mo (P < 0.05 compared with 9 mo).

These indexes were correlated to the dose of exercise with a second-order regression model (Fig. 3). When TRIMP was increased up to ~2,000 (equivalent to exercise at 75% maximal HR for 200 to ~220 min/wk), stroke volume increased progressively and then plateaued with no further increase despite increasing training stimulus. In contrast, TPR, SBP, and diastolic BP exhibited a "U-shaped" curve that centered around a TRIMP of ~1,500, equivalent to exercise at 75% maximal HR for 160 to ~180 min/wk.

Time domain analysis. The standard deviation of R-R variability (SDR-R) was increased significantly at 3 and 6 mo of training compared with baseline. However, SDR-R returned to the control levels at 9 and 12 mo (Fig. 3). The change in SDR-R was correlated to the dose of exercise with a second-order regression model and had a "bell-shaped" curve that centered around a TRIMP of 1,000 to ~1,500, approximately equivalent to exercise at 75% maximal HR for 120 to ~180 min/wk (Fig. 3).

Spectral analysis. The low-frequency power of R-R interval variability was increased significantly at 3 and 6 mo of training and returned to the control levels at 9 and 12 mo (Fig. 4). The high-frequency power of R-R interval variability tended to increase at 3 mo, although it was not statistically significant. There were no significant changes in normalized indexes of R-R interval variability. In contrast, the low-frequency power of SBP variability increased significantly at 3, 6, and 9 mo of training compared with baseline, and returned to near control levels at 12 mo (Fig. 4). The high-frequency power of SBP variability tended to decrease, although it was not statistically significant (P = 0.06). The low-frequency power in both R-R interval and SBP variabilities was correlated to the dose of exercise with a second-order regression model that resembled a bell-shaped curve, which also centered around a TRIMP of 1,000 to ~1,500 (Fig. 4).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Dose-response relationship between exercise intensity (monthly TRIMP) and dynamic cardiovascular indexes. The vertical dotted line is the same as in Fig 3. LFR-R, low-frequency power of R-R interval (A); LFBP, low-frequency power of blood pressure variability (B); Gain LF, transfer function gain in low-frequency range (C); Gain HF, transfer function gain in high-frequency range (D). *P < 0.05 compared with pretraining baseline. #P < 0.05 compared with 9 mo.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Changes in cardiovascular variability during training

 

Baroreflex function. Compared with baseline, Gain HF was significantly increased at 3 and 6 mo of training and returned to the control levels at 9 and 12 mo (Fig. 4). Furthermore, Gain LF tended to increase at 3 and 6 mo of training and returned to control levels at 9 and 12 mo (Fig. 4). Estimate of coherence was 0.57 ± 0.02 in the high-frequency range and 0.54 ± 0.02 in the low frequency with a negative phase; neither coherence nor phase changed during training. Both Gain HF and Gain LF were correlated to the dose of exercise with a second-order regression and had bell-shaped curves that centered around a TRIMP of 1,000 to ~1,500 (Fig. 4).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The primary new findings from the present study are threefold. 1) Moderate amounts of exercise training for 3 mo are sufficient to achieve substantial changes in BP and dynamic regulation of HR. 2) More prolonged and intense training does not necessarily lead to greater enhancement of these changes. 3) The relationship between the exercise training stimulus and the responses in BP or reflex control of HR do not follow a simple, linear dose-response relationship and may have a bell-shaped or U-shaped relation with a maximal response at moderate amounts of training.

Steady-state hemodynamics. Decreases in BP after 3 mo of training, in association with decreased TPR and increased cardiac output, suggest that the training-induced reduction in BP is mediated primarily by a decrease in peripheral vascular resistance. This initial reduction in BP remained unchanged despite increases in exercise duration and intensity up to 9 mo of additional training. Thus the majority of the hypotensive effect of endurance training was achieved with a moderate dose of exercise that can be achieved by most individuals who engage in an exercise program. One possible mechanism of these changes may be increases in the production of vasoactive factors by the endothelium after training in healthy subjects (24). The fact that BP returned to pretraining levels with high-intensity and long-duration training sessions at the end of training program is consistent with two previous studies (17, 31) that tested different intensities of exercise. Both of these investigations suggested that higher-intensity training may be less effective in decreasing BP than lower-intensity training.

HR variability. Spectral analysis of HR variability quantifies the dynamic, frequency-dependent changes in HR, which reflect autonomic modulation of sinus node activity (2, 36). High-frequency power of R-R interval (>0.15 Hz) appears to be mediated predominantly by changes in vagal activity, whereas low-frequency power (<0.15 Hz) is determined by changes in both sympathetic and vagal activity (2, 36).

Most previous longitudinal studies (28, 42, 43) have shown that exercise training increases HR variability. Increases in R-R interval and the variability indexes at 3 and 6 mo in the present study are remarkably consistent with these previous reports. From the present study, it appears that moderate amounts of exercise training for 3 mo are sufficient to achieve the majority of this response.

In contrast, some cross-sectional and more prolonged longitudinal studies showed no difference in HR variability between endurance athletes and untrained subjects (7, 39) or with prolonged endurance training (30). However, these reports are also consistent with our results, which showed that the increased HR variability returned to baseline after high-intensity training for 9 mo. Thus the results from the present study may reconcile these previous apparently contradictory results between longitudinal and cross-sectional studies.

The reduction in HR and increases in HR variability are likely primarily due to augmented parasympathetic activity by training. However, the normalization of HR variability after 9 mo of intensive training, as well as the absence of changes in high-frequency power of R-R interval, are inconsistent with sustained increases in parasympathetic tone. There are three possible explanations for the dissociation between apparent increased parasympathetic tone (i.e., decreased HR) and the changes in HR variability parameters during training. First, increased vagal discharge may give rise to relatively constant or saturated parasympathetic modulation of the sinus node, diminishing the HR variability despite overall increases in vagal tone (16). Second, it is possible that moderate exercise for 3 mo mainly augments vagal activity but after more prolonged and intense training reductions in resting sympathetic activity (12) may become more prominent. Reduced sympathetic activity may also reduce both HR and HR variability, especially at low frequencies, as observed after 6 mo in this study. Third, cardiac remodeling with training may alter the intrinsic HR, independent of autonomic mechanisms (29). This remodeling may also help explain the reduction in peak HR after training (29).

BP variability. Arterial pressure Mayer waves, occurring at ~0.1 Hz, are presumed to result from sympathetic vasomotor activity. Therefore, the low-frequency power of BP variability may reflect the magnitude of sympathetic vasomotor variability (37).

However, although BP and TPR decreased, there did not appear to be any decrease in vasomotor activity, as indicated by increases rather than decreases in low-frequency BP variability in the present study. This discrepancy may be explained by vascular remodeling during exercise training, which occurs through adaptation of the endothelium and/or smooth muscle (10, 24). Thus remodeling of peripheral vessels may develop during the time course of exercise training that may modify or counterbalance neural effects on BP variability.

Baroreflex function. Previous results of the effects of exercise training on the baroreflex have been conflicting (6, 27, 30, 32, 43, 44). However, the non-linear dose-response relationship between exercise training and dynamic regulation of HR in the present study may explain those previous conflicting reports. Virtually all static (except resting HR) and dynamic circulatory variables in the present study suggested that the relationship between the dose of exercise training and the changes in autonomic control of the circulation has a bell-shaped relation. One explanation may be that, after 12 mo of intensive training, our subjects might have become slightly overtrained (49). A second possibility may be a differential time course of cardiac vs. vascular remodeling with long-term training. Preliminary reports from these subjects suggest that the early stages of exercise training result in concentric, right and left ventricular hypertrophy (15), which would increase right ventricular and/or left ventricular interaction. However, progressive training leads to left ventricular dilation and possibly even reduced pericardial constraint, thereby resetting autonomic control closer to the untrained state. Our findings suggest that different study designs, different levels of fitness, or different training intensities may lead to divergent results (increase, no change, decrease in baroreflex).

Limitations. Because training increased in dose over the entire study, and there was no control group that did not exercise, we cannot differentiate clearly the effects of time or duration of training per se from the specific dose of training. Therefore, our results must be interpreted cautiously. We suspect, but cannot prove, that continued training over time at any given dose would not change cardiovascular parameters such as those measured here. We can say, however, that, in previous investigations involving many of these same volunteers, HR and BP variability appear consistently sensitive to physical activity, changing in directionally opposite ways with induced deconditioning compared with exercise training (21). Moreover, these measures of HR and BP variability appear robust and change little over time periods as long as 1 yr without any intervention (21).

In addition, the subjects studied were young and free of known cardiovascular disease. Thus these results are more relevant to primary rather than secondary coronary heart disease prevention. Because both age (1) and the presence of cardiovascular disease both decrease HR variability (8, 9, 14, 45), the results of this study could be different in older individuals or in those with manifest cardiovascular disease. Indeed, it is possible that such patients could have a greater range of responsiveness and thus have a more robust or sustained response to training.

We must also point out that during the last 3 mo of the training program, the increase in exercise dose was accomplished by increasing the duration of base training sessions (particularly long runs) with an actual decrease in the number of high-intensity sessions compared with the previous 3 mo. It is possible that this reduction in intensity could explain at least part of the return of many of the measured cardiovascular variables to baseline. However, the largest improvement in HR, BP, and cardiovascular variability occurred during the first 3 mo of training, when no intervals were performed. Second, the improvements in hemodynamics and cardiovascular variability from 6 to 9 mo were modest and, in the case of many variables, nonexistent (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4) despite the fact that the increase in intensity was most marked during this part of the training program. Third, high-intensity sessions continued to be performed during the last 3 mo of our training program, just at a reduced frequency.

Clinical implication. A critical question regarding the effect of exercise on cardiovascular mortality is the intensity and duration of exercise training required to achieve a clinically meaningful reduction in death from cardiovascular disease (18, 26). Previous studies have suggested that increased vagal activity after training, which may reduce the risk of ventricular fibrillation during ischemic exercise, may be a key mechanism for the reduction in sudden death associated with exercise training (20). These experimental observations are supported by epidemiologic studies that have shown an inverse association between HR variability and heart disease risk (25, 48). Although we did not try to elucidate the mechanisms of the reduction in mortality from cardiovascular disease in the present study, our results suggest that moderate exercise training for 3 mo is sufficient to achieve a clinically meaningful increase in vagal modulation of the sinus node. Furthermore, our results also showed that moderate exercise training for 3 mo is sufficient to reduce BP.

These observations extend and provide one potential mechanism for epidemiologic investigations relating leisure time physical activity to cardiovascular mortality. For example, Paffenbarger et al. (35) suggested that energy expended during recreational activity is inversely related to total mortality, and death rates were significantly lower among the subjects expending >=2,000 kcal during exercise per week than among less active men. This level of leisure-time physical activity is remarkably consistent with our results, suggesting that moderate amounts of exercise (from 80-100 kcal/10 min for 180-200 min/wk) is sufficient to achieve substantial changes in BP and dynamic regulation of HR. However, our results also showed that more prolonged and intense training does not necessarily lead to greater enhancement of these changes in BP and autonomic control of the circulation and, therefore, may not provide an added protective benefit against cardiovascular mortality by these mechanisms.


    APPENDIX
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Specific calculations for estimation of the TRIMP were derived from Banister et al. (4). The duration of any specific training session is muliplied by the average HR achieved during that session (HRavg), as measured by using a HR monitor. HRavg is then expressed as a fraction of the HR reserve, which is derived from direct measurements of resting HR (quiet, supine rest before arousal from bed in the morning) and maximum HR from a maximal exercise test. The different exponents for males and females are empirically derived from lactate appearance/disappearance curves (4) and provide an additional weighting factor, which increases the TRIMP score for relatively higher exercise intensities.

For males, TRIMP = training duration x [(HRavg - HRrest)/(HRmax - HRrest)] x 0.64exp[(HRavg - HRrest)/(HRmax - HRrest) x 1.92], where HRmax is maximal HR and HRrest is resting HR. For females, TRIMP = training duration x [(HRavg - HRrest)/(HRmax - HRrest)] x 0.86exp[(HRavg - HRrest)/(HRmax - HRrest) x 1.67].


    DISCLOSURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study was supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration Grant NGW3582, the S. Finley Ewing Chair for Wellness at Presbyterian Hospital, and the Harry S. Moss Heart Chair for Cardiovascular Research.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Special thanks goes to Matthew J. Morrow for work in training the subjects.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: B. D. Levine, 7232 Greenville Ave, Suite 435, Dallas, TX 75231 (E-mail: BenjaminLevine{at}TexasHealth.org).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Agelink MW, Malessa R, Baumann B, Majewski T, Akila F, Zeit T, and Ziegler D. Standardized tests of heart rate variability: normal ranges obtained from 309 healthy humans, and effects of age, gender, and heart rate. Clin Auton Res 11: 99-108, 2001.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Akselrod SD, Gordon D, Ubel FA, Shannon DC, Barger AC, and Cohen RJ. Power spectral analysis of heart rate fluctuations: a quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. Science 213: 220-223, 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Anderson GS and Rhodes EC. A review of blood-lactate and ventilatory methods of detecting transition thresholds. Sports Med 8: 43-55, 1989.[ISI][Medline]
  4. Banister EW, Morton RH, and Fitz-Clarke J. Dose/response effects of exercise modeled from training: physical and biochemical measures. Ann Physiol Anthropol 11: 345-356, 1992.[Medline]
  5. Barney JA, Ebert TJ, Groban L, Farrell PA, Hughes CV, and Smith JJ. Carotid baroreflex responsiveness in high-fit and sedentary young men. J Appl Physiol 65: 2190-2194, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bowman AJ, Clayton RH, Murray A, Reed JW, Subhan MF, and Ford GA. Baroreflex function in sedentary and endurance-trained elderly people. Age Ageing 26: 289-294, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Brennan M, O'Brien E, and O'Malley K. The effect of age on blood pressure and heart rate variability in hypertension. J Hypertens Suppl 4: S269-S272, 1986.[Medline]
  8. Cowan MJ, Pike K, and Burr RL. Effects of gender and age on heart rate variability in healthy individuals and in persons after sudden cardiac arrest. J Electrocardiol 27, Suppl: 1-9, 1994.[ISI][Medline]
  9. Delp MD, McAllister RM, and Laughlin MH. Exercise training alters endothelium-dependent vasoreactivity of rat abdominal aorta. J Appl Physiol 75: 1354-1363, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Duncan JJ, Farr JE, Upton SJ, Hagan RD, Oglesby ME, and Blair SN. The effects of aerobic exercise on plasma catecholamines and blood pressure in patients with mild essential hypertension. JAMA 254: 2609-2613, 1985.[Abstract]
  11. Ekblom B, Kilbom A, and Soltysiak J. Physical training, bradycardia, and autonomic nervous system. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 32: 251-256, 1973.[Medline]
  12. Farrell SW, Kampert JB, Kohl HW III, Barlow CE, Macera CA, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Gibbons LW, and Blair SN. Influences of cardiorespiratory fitness levels and other predictors on cardiovascular disease mortality in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30: 899-905, 1998.[ISI][Medline]
  13. Farrell TG, Bashir Y, Cripps T, Malik M, Poloniecki J, Bennett ED, Ward DE, and Camm AJ. Risk stratification for arrhythmic events in postinfarction patients based on heart rate variability, ambulatory electrocardiographic variables and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. J Am Coll Cardiol 18: 687-697, 1991.[Abstract]
  14. Franco F, Morrow MJ, Zuckerman JH, Zhang R, Peshock RM, and Levine BD. Right ventricular enlargement precedes left ventricular enlargement during long term endurance training. Circulation 98: 1-85, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Goldberger JJ, Kim YH, Ahmed MW, and Kadish AH. Effect of graded increases in parasympathetic tone on heart rate variability. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 7: 594-602, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
  16. Hagberg JM, Montain SJ, Martin WH III, and Ehsani AA. Effect of exercise training in 60- to 69-year-old persons with essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol 64: 348-353, 1989.[ISI][Medline]
  17. Haskell WLJB. Wolffe Memorial Lecture. Health consequences of physical activity: understanding and challenges regarding dose-response. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26: 649-660, 1994.[ISI][Medline]
  18. Helmrich SP, Ragland DR, Leung RW, and Paffenbarger RS Jr. Physical activity and reduced occurrence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 325: 147-152, 1991.[Abstract]
  19. Hull SS Jr, Vanoli E, Adamson PB, Verrier RL, Foreman RD, and Schwartz PJ. Exercise training confers anticipatory protection from sudden death during acute myocardial ischemia. Circulation 89: 548-552, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Iwasaki K, Zhang R, Zuckerman JH, Pawelczyk JA, and Levine BD. Effect of head-down-tilt bed rest and hypovolemia on dynamic regulation of heart rate and blood pressure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 279: R2189-R2199, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kallio V, Hamalainen H, Hakkila J, and Luurila OJ. Reduction in sudden deaths by a multifactorial intervention programme after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 2: 1091-1094, 1979.[ISI][Medline]
  22. King AC, Haskell WL, Young DR, Oka RK, and Stefanick ML. Long-term effects of varying intensities and formats of physical activity on participation rates, fitness, and lipoproteins in men and women aged 50 to 65 years. Circulation 91: 2596-2604, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kingwell BA, Sherrard B, Jennings GL, and Dart AM. Four weeks of cycle training increases basal production of nitric oxide from the forearm. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 272: H1070-H1077, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. La Rovere MT, Bigger JT Jr, Marcus FI, Mortara A, and Schwartz PJ. Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction ATRAMI (Autonomic Tone and Reflexes After Myocardial Infarction) Investigators. Lancet 351: 478-484, 1998.[ISI][Medline]
  25. Lee IM, Hsieh CC, and Paffenbarger RS Jr. Exercise intensity and longevity in men. The Harvard Alumni Health Study. JAMA 273: 1179-1184, 1995.[Abstract]
  26. Levine BD, Buckey JC, Fritsch JM, Yancy CW Jr. Watenpaugh DE, Snell PG, Lane LD, Eckberg DL, and Blomqvist CG. Physical fitness and cardiovascular regulation: mechanisms of orthostatic intolerance. J Appl Physiol 70: 112-122, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Levy WC, Cerqueira MD, Harp GD, Johannessen KA, Abrass IB, Schwartz RS, and Stratton JR. Effect of endurance exercise training on heart rate variability at rest in healthy young and older men. Am J Cardiol 82: 1236-1241, 1998.[ISI][Medline]
  28. Lewis SF, Nylander E, Gad P, and Areskog NH. Non-autonomic component in bradycardia of endurance trained men at rest and during exercise. Acta Physiol Scand 109: 297-305, 1980.[ISI][Medline]
  29. Loimaala A, Huikuri H, Oja P, Pasanen M, and Vuori I. Controlled 5-mo aerobic training improves heart rate but not heart rate variability or baroreflex sensitivity. J Appl Physiol 89: 1825-1829, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Matsusaki M, Ikeda M, Tashiro E, Koga M, Miura S, Ideishi M, Tanaka H, Shindo M, and Arakawa K. Influence of workload on the antihypertensive effect of exercise. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 19: 471-479, 1992.[ISI][Medline]
  31. McDonald MP, Sanfilippo AJ, and Savard GK. Baroreflex function and cardiac structure with moderate endurance training in normotensive men. J Appl Physiol 74: 2469-2477, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Nelson KS, Weber RR, Elliott WJ, Zebrauskas D, and Murphy MB. Evaluation of the Suntech Accutracker. A novel noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitor. Am J Hypertens 1: 121-123, 1988.
  33. O'Connor GT, Hennekens CH, Willett WC, Goldhaber SZ, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Breslow JL, Lee IM, and Buring JE. Physical exercise and reduced risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction. Am J Epidemiol 142: 1147-1156, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Paffenbarger RS Jr, Hyde RT, Wing AL, and Hsieh CC. Physical activity, all-cause mortality, and longevity of college alumni. N Engl J Med 314: 605-613, 1986.[Abstract]
  35. Pagani M, Lombardi F, Guzzetti S, Rimoldi O, Furlan R, Pizzinelli P, Sandrone G, Malfatto G, Dell'Orto S, Piccaluga E, Tureil M, Baselli G, Cerutti S, and Malliani A. Power spectral analysis of heart rate and arterial pressure variabilities as a marker of sympatho-vagal interaction in man and conscious dog. Circ Res 59: 178-193, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Pagani M, Montano N, Porta A, Malliani A, Abboud FM, birkett C, and Somers VK. Relationship between spectral components of cardiovascular variabilities and direct measures of muscle sympathetic nerve activity in humans. Circulation 95: 1441-1448, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Parati G, Casadei R, Groppelli A, Di Rienzo M, and Mancia G. Comparison of finger and intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring at rest and during laboratory testing. Hypertension 13: 647-655, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Reiling MJ and Seals DR. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia and carotid baroreflex control of heart rate in endurance athletes and untrained controls. Clin Physiol 8: 511-519, 1988.[ISI][Medline]
  39. Rogers MA, Yamamoto C, Hagberg JM, Holloszy JO, and Ehsani AA. The effect of 7 years of intense exercise training on patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 10: 321-326, 1987.[Abstract]
  40. Saul JP, Berger RD, Albrecht P, Stein S, Chen MH, and Cohen RJ. Transfer function analysis of the circulation: unique insights into cardiovascular regulation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 261: H1231-H1245, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Schuit AJ, van Amelsvoort LG, Verheij TC, Rijneke RD, Maan AC, Swenne CA, and Schouten EG. Exercise training and heart rate variability in older people. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31: 816-821, 1999.[ISI][Medline]
  42. Seals DR and Chase PB. Influence of physical training on heart rate variability and baroreflex circulatory control. J Appl Physiol 66: 1886-1895, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Shi X, Crandall CG, Potts JT, Foresman BH, and Raven PB. A diminished aortic-cardiac reflex during hypotension in aerobically fit young men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25: 1024-1030, 1993.[ISI][Medline]
  44. Soejima K, Akaishi M, Meguro T, Oyamada K, Yoshikawa T, Mitamura H, and Ogawa S. Age-adjusted heart rate variability as an index of the severity and prognosis of heart failure. Jpn Circ J 64: 32-38, 2000.[Medline]
  45. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation 93: 1043-1065, 1996.[Free Full Text]
  46. Thompson PD, Cullinane EM, Sady SP, Flynn MM, Bernier DN, Kantor MA, Saritelli AL, and Herbert PN. Modest changes in high-density lipoprotein concentration and metabolism with prolonged exercise training. Circulation 78: 25-34, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Triebwasser JH, Johnson RL, Burpo RP, Campbell JC, Reardon WC, and Blomqvist CG. Noninvasive determination of cardiac output by a modified acetylene rebreathing procedure utilizing mass spectrometer measurements. Aviat Space Environ Med 48: 203-209, 1977.[Medline]
  48. Tsuji H, Larson MG, Venditti FJ Jr, Manders ES, Evans JC, Feldman CL, and Levy D. Impact of reduced heart rate variability on risk for cardiac events. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 94: 2850-2855, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Uusitalo AL, Uusitalo AJ, and Rusko HK. Heart rate and blood pressure variability during heavy training and overtraining in the female athlete. Int J Sports Med 21: 45-53, 2000.[ISI][Medline]
  50. Vigil JI. Road To The Top. Albuquerque, NM: Creative Designs, 1995.
  51. Williams PT. Relationships of heart disease risk factors to exercise quantity and intensity. Arch Intern Med 158: 237-245, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
W. E. Kraus and B. D. Levine
Exercise Training for Diabetes: The "Strength" of the Evidence
Ann Intern Med, September 18, 2007; 147(6): 423 - 424.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
Q. Fu, N. E. Townsend, S. M. Shiller, E. R. Martini, K. Okazaki, S. Shibata, M. J. Truijens, F. A. Rodriguez, C. J. Gore, J. Stray-Gundersen, et al.
Intermittent hypobaric hypoxia exposure does not cause sustained alterations in autonomic control of blood pressure in young athletes
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): R1977 - R1984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. J. Mueller
Exercise training attenuates increases in lumbar sympathetic nerve activity produced by stimulation of the rostral ventrolateral medulla
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2007; 102(2): 803 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
E. T. Schroeder, S. A. Hawkins, D. Hyslop, A. F. Vallejo, N. E. Jensky, and R. A. Wiswell
Longitudinal Change in Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors in Older Runners
Age Ageing, January 1, 2007; 36(1): 57 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Buchheit and C. Gindre
Cardiac parasympathetic regulation: respective associations with cardiorespiratory fitness and training load
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): H451 - H458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
P. J. Mueller and E. M. Hasser
Putative role of the NTS in alterations in neural control of the circulation following exercise training in rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): R383 - R392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. J. Gore, W. G. Hopkins, and C. M. Burge
Errors of measurement for blood volume parameters: a meta-analysis
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2005; 99(5): 1745 - 1758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. Okazaki, K.-i. Iwasaki, A. Prasad, M. D. Palmer, E. R. Martini, Q. Fu, A. Arbab-Zadeh, R. Zhang, and B. D. Levine
Dose-response relationship of endurance training for autonomic circulatory control in healthy seniors
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2005; 99(3): 1041 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. Winker, A. Barth, D. Bidmon, I. Ponocny, M. Weber, O. Mayr, D. Robertson, A. Diedrich, R. Maier, A. Pilger, et al.
Endurance Exercise Training in Orthostatic Intolerance: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Hypertension, March 1, 2005; 45(3): 391 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Buchheit, C. Simon, F. Piquard, J. Ehrhart, and G. Brandenberger
Effects of increased training load on vagal-related indexes of heart rate variability: a novel sleep approach
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): H2813 - H2818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Q. Fu, S. Witkowski, and B. D. Levine
Vasoconstrictor Reserve and Sympathetic Neural Control of Orthostasis
Circulation, November 2, 2004; 110(18): 2931 - 2937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. L. T. Uusitalo, T. Laitinen, S. B. Vaisanen, E. Lansimies, and R. Rauramaa
Physical training and heart rate and blood pressure variability: a 5-yr randomized trial
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): H1821 - H1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/4/1575    most recent
00482.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited