Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 95: 1325-1332, 2003. First published May 30, 2003; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00272.2003
8750-7587/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/3/1325    most recent
00272.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bergner, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bergner, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, M. J.

HIGHLIGHTED TOPICS
Airway Hyperresponsiveness: From Molecules to Bedside

Selected Contribution: Airway contractility and smooth muscle Ca2+ signaling in lung slices from different mouse strains

Albrecht Bergner and Michael J. Sanderson

Department of Physiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655

Submitted 14 March 2003 ; accepted in final form 16 May 2003


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
To investigate the hypothesis that altered Ca2+ signaling in airway smooth muscle cells (SMCs) is responsible for airway hyperreactivity, we compared, with the use of confocal and phase-contrast microscopy, the airway contractility and Ca2+ changes in SMCs induced by acetylcholine (ACh) in lung slices from different mouse strains (A/J, Balb/C, and C3H/ HeJ). The airways from each mouse strain displayed a concentration-dependent contraction to ACh. The contractile response of the airways of the C3H/HeJ mice was found, in contrast to earlier studies, to be much greater and faster than that of A/J and Balb/C mice. This difference in airway reactivity can be, in part, attributable to halothane, a volatile anesthetic that was previously used during in vivo measurements of airway reactivity but found here to significantly alter the ACh contractile response of airways in lung slices. The ACh-induced Ca2+ response of the airway SMCs in all of the various mouse strains was also concentration dependent. The magnitude of the initial Ca2+ increase and the frequency of the subsequent Ca2+ oscillations induced by ACh increased with ACh concentration. However, no differences in the Ca2+ responses to ACh could be distinguished between the mouse strains. These results suggest that the mechanism responsible for airway hyperreactivity in different mouse strains resides with the Ca2+ sensitivity of the contractile apparatus of the SMCs rather than with the Ca2+ signaling itself.

hyperreactivity; asthma; acetylcholine; halothane; confocal microscopy


AIRWAY HYPERREACTIVITY, THE excessive contraction of the airways in response to agonists, is a major characteristic of asthma (3, 18) but one that is not yet fully understood (11, 12). Although airway reactivity may be increased by airway inflammation and smooth muscle cell (SMC) hypertrophy or hyperplasia, the most obvious event that leads to airway narrowing is the contraction of the airway SMCs. A key feature underlying the contraction of airway SMCs is an increase in intra- cellular free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i), and this increase may be brought about by a variety of stimulants. Although a change in membrane potential can lead to an increase in [Ca2+]i as a result of Ca2+ influx through voltage-dependent channels, airway SMC contractility appears to be strongly stimulated by agonist- receptor interactions. Agonists such as acetylcholine (ACh), histamine, serotonin, and ATP act via G-coupled receptors and phospholipase C activation to produce inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and release Ca2+ from internal stores to induce strong, sustained contractions in airway SMCs (8, 9, 13, 20, 24). The magnitude and duration of the contraction of the airway SMCs are the key parameters that determine airway hyperreactivity, and these responses have generally been believed to be associated with a sustained increase in [Ca2+]i. Interestingly, Tao et al. (25, 26) reported enhanced Ca2+ mobilization in response to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in cultured tracheal SMCs of hyperreactive rats, and this raised the question: Is altered Ca2+ signaling responsible for excessive SMC contractility? However, a unique characteristic of IP3-mediated Ca2+ signaling is the development of repetitive increases in Ca2+ or Ca2+ oscillations rather than the maintenance of an elevated [Ca2+]i (4). Consequently, the finding that the contraction of airway SMCs induced by ACh and ATP only persists while Ca2+ oscillations occur in the airway SMCs suggests that Ca2+ oscillations may determine the extent of airway SMC contraction (1, 2). An extension of these ideas is the hypothesis that excessive Ca2+ signaling may be responsible for airway hyperreactivity.

Mice have often been proposed as an experimental animal-model system in which to explore airway reactivity. As a result, measurements of airway reactivity in live animals have been made in a variety of inbred mice (6, 7, 15). Similar approaches have been performed in rats (25). In the initial studies that examined nine different mouse strains (individuals anesthetized with the volatile anesthetic halothane), it was found, based on lung function tests, that in response to intravenous ACh the mouse strain A/J was the most hyper- reactive in its airway response. The Balb/C strain had an intermediate or normal response, whereas the C3H/ HeJ mouse strain was found to be the least reactive (or hyporeactive relative to the Balb/C strain) (15). A similar classification for these mouse strains was found in response to 5-HT (16). Consequently, these mouse strains provide a unique opportunity to correlate the cellular events within SMCs with changes in airway reactivity.

To take advantage of these mouse models, we have refined the preparation of lung slices to correlate changes in airway caliber with measurements of Ca2+ signaling in single-airway SMCs (1, 2). Thick lung slices have been used by a variety of groups (5, 17, 22), but these precluded the observation of the Ca2+ dynamics of single cells. With thinner (~75 µm) lung slice preparations and confocal microscopy, we have found that ACh (1) and ATP (2) induce Ca2+ oscillations in airway SMCs. Furthermore, the extent and maintenance of the airway contraction appeared to be determined by the frequency and persistence of the Ca2+ oscillations. Consequently, we have investigated here the Ca2+ signaling of airway SMCs in mouse strains that exhibit a range of airway reactivity.

By directly measuring changes in airway caliber in response to ACh in three different mouse strains, we have found that the C3H/HeJ mouse showed the greatest degree of airway reactivity, whereas the Balb/C and A/J mice were similar, but less, in their response. However, the ACh-induced Ca2+ signaling, including the initial Ca2+ transient and the frequency of the subsequent Ca2+ oscillations in each mouse strain, was very similar. The order of the airway hyperreactivity differs from previous studies, and one explanation may be the presence of halothane, a volatile anesthetic, which in the previous studies mitigated the ACh responses. From these results, we conclude that the mechanism responsible for airway hyperreactivity in different mouse strains may be associated with the Ca2+ sensitivity of the contractile apparatus of the SMCs rather than with the Ca2+ signaling elements.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Materials. Cell culture reagents were obtained from Invitrogen Life Technologies-GIBCO (Carlsbad, CA). Other re- agents were obtained from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). In most cases, the Hanks' balanced salt solution was supplemented (sHBSS) with HEPES buffer (25 mM) but lacked phenol red.

Lung slices. Lung slices were prepared as previously described (1). Briefly, male mice from three different inbred strains (Balb/C from Charles River Breeding Labs, Needham, MA; C3H/HeJ and A/J from Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME; 42-77 days old) were killed by intraperitoneal injection of Nembutal. This protocol was approved by the University of Massachusetts Medial School Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The chest wall was removed and the trachea was cannulated by using an intravenous catheter (20G Intima, Becton Dickinson, Sandy, UT), and the lungs were inflated with 2% agarose-sHBSS at 37°C (~1 ml). To ensure that the airways were free to contract and not subject to luminal resistance, 0.1-0.2 ml of air was subsequently injected to flush the agarose-sHBSS out of the airways and into the alveoli. To stiffen the soft lung tissue for sectioning, the agarose was gelled by placing the mouse preparation at 4°C. The lungs were removed, and slices of ~75 µm thickness were cut with an EMS-4000 tissue slicer (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA). The slices were maintained by floating them in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics and antimycotics at 37°C in 10% CO2 for up to 5 days.

Measurement of airway contraction. Lung slices were placed on a cover glass within a custom-made Plexiglas chamber and held in position by a piece of nylon mesh (CMN-300-B, Small Parts, Miami Lakes, FL). Phase-contrast images were recorded with a digital charge-coupled device camera (TM-6710, Pulnix America, Sunnyvale, CA), a digital camera interface (Road Runner, BitFlow, Woburn, MA), and image acquisition software (Video Savant, IO Industries, London, ON, Canada). Frames were captured in time lapse (33-ms exposure, 1 frame/s), and the cross-sectional area of the airway was measured with respect to time, by pixel summing, with the use of the image analysis software Scion (Scion, Frederick, MD; free download available at www.scioncorp.com).

Throughout this paper, we refer to a decrease in the cross-sectional area as airway contraction. The contraction velocity of an airway was calculated as the percent decrease in cross-sectional area with respect to time (%s-1) in the first 10 s after the addition of ACh. This time was chosen because the contraction was found to be approximately linear in the first 10 s.

Measurements of [Ca2+]i. The changes in the [Ca2+]i were monitored with confocal microscopy as previously described in detail (1). Briefly, lung slices were loaded with the calcium indicator dye Oregon green [20 µM for 1 h, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR (1)] in sHBSS containing 0.2% Pluronic (Pluronic F-127, Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA), 100 µM sulfobromophthalein, and 3 mg/ml ascorbic acid (antioxidant to reduce bleaching). After they were washed in sHBSS (containing 100 µM sulfobromophthalein and 3 mg/ml ascorbic acid) to allow for complete deesterification of the dye, the lung slices were examined with a custom-built confocal microscope (23) based on an inverted microscope with a x40, 1.3 numerical aperture, oil-immersion objective (Nikon). Excitation light was provided at 488 nm by an argon laser, and the emitted fluorescence (>510 nm) was monitored. Individual images were captured with exposure times of 33 ms and recorded at 0.5-s intervals (time lapse of 2 images/s).

Regions of interest (ROIs) of 8.4 x 8.4 µm (10 x 10 pixels) were defined near the middle of single SMCs, and the average fluorescence intensities of each ROI were obtained. To compensate for the initial contraction-induced movements of the SMCs, the pixel location of the ROI was interactively reassigned or tracked by the investigator with the use of a custom-written macro (within Scion software). The images were played frame by frame to determine and assign the ROI position for analysis. The use of a multiple pixel area (10 x 10 pixels) compensates for slight misalignments. Pixel tracking was not required after the maximum contraction was achieved when the Ca2+ oscillations still persisted.

A bleach-correction factor was calculated for each individual cell, from the bleaching rate that occurred during the period of 15-30 s before the addition of drugs. Data from individual cells were corrected with the appropriate bleach- correction factor before a rolling average of three frames was calculated. Final fluorescence values were expressed as a fluorescence ratio (F/F0) normalized to the initial fluorescence (F0).

Drug application. ACh and halothane were dissolved in sHBSS, and a 10x concentrated solution was added (15 µl) to the bath solution (135 µl) in which the final working concentration was obtained by dilution. All experiments were conducted at room temperature.

Statistics. Statistical analysis was performed with the oneway ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA on ranks (all pairwise multiple comparison procedures = Student-Newman-Keuls method). Values are given as means ± SE. A P value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
ACh-induced airway contraction. Experiments were only performed on airways that had a lumen that was free of agarose and were lined by epithelial cells showing ciliary activity. Both of these characteristics were readily identified by phase-contrast microscopy (Fig. 1). In addition, airways with similar cross-sectional areas were selected to compare airways with similar structures and positions within the respiratory tract. The mean cross-sectional area of the airways used throughout this study was 35,924 ± 2,199 µm2 (mean ± SE, n = 156). Because all lung slices were treated similarly, it was assumed that the airways would have a similar resting or basal tone. No treatments or agonists were applied to relax airways before the addition of ACh, as these may have compromised the sensitivity of the airways to ACh.



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Appearance of ACh-induced airway contraction in lung slices. The phase-contrast micrographs show airways in lung slices cut from an A/J mouse (A and B) and a C3H/HeJ mouse (C and D) immediately before (A and C) and 5 min after (B and D) the addition of 100 nM ACh. AL, airway lumen. Bars = 50 µm.

 

The addition of ACh initially induced the airways of all the various mouse strains to contract. Subsequently, in the continued presence of ACh, the contraction stabilized such that the lumen of the airway was maintained at a reduced size (Fig. 2, A-C). This ACh- induced contraction of the airways (ranging from 10 nM to 10 µM) was concentration dependent in each mouse strain examined (Fig. 2D). However, the magnitude and rate of the airway contraction varied between mouse strains. For example, a concentration of 100 nM ACh (or higher) induced a maximal contraction (a reduction of ~40% of starting area, P < 0.05) of the airways of C3H/HeJ mice (Fig. 2C). By contrast, the same concentration of ACh induced a significantly smaller contraction in A/J (~20% of starting area) and Balb/C (~14%) mice airways. It is important to note that airway resistance is proportional to the inverse of the airway radius to the fourth power (Poiseuille's rule; R {propto} 1/r4). Consequently, a small decrease in airway diameter can lead to large changes in resistance. We calculate that a decrease in the area of 40% results in a ~2.7x increase in airway resistance. The smaller changes in airway area observed in A/J and Balb/C mice still represent significant increases in airway resistance of 1.56x and 1.36x, respectively. A concentration of 500 nM (or higher) ACh was required to induce a maximal contraction in A/J (~ 25%) and Balb/C mice (~20%) (Fig. 2D).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Airway contraction induced by ACh in 3 different mouse strains. A-C: cross-sectional area of the airway lumen was calculated (% of the starting area) and plotted against time. Concentration of 0.1 µM ACh induced contraction of airways in lung slices cut from Balb/C (A), A/J (B), and C3H/HeJ (C) mice. Traces shown are representative for 8 different experiments in 8 different airways of 8 different lung slices. D: maximum reduction in airway area attained in each experiment within 5 min after the addition of ACh was plotted against ACh concentration. For each mouse strain, a concentration-dependent increase in airway contraction could be observed. The airways of C3H/HeJ mice ({diamond}) contracted to a greater extent than those of A/J ({blacksquare}) and Balb/C ({circ}) mice. Each point represents the mean ± SE of 5-10 experiments performed in 5-10 different airways of 5-10 different lung slices. The mean cross-sectional area of the airways used in these experiments was 36,123 ± 2,292 µm2 (mean ± SE, n = 137). *P < 0.05 vs. corresponding experimental groups of A/J and Balb/C strains.

 

The initial rate of airway contraction was also faster in C3H/HeJ mice (1.9 ± 0.5%s-1, mean ± SE, n = 8 mice, P < 0.05) compared with A/J mice (1.1 ± 0.4%s-1, n = 8 mice) and Balb/C mice (0.5 ± 0.1%s-1, n = 8 mice, Fig. 3A). However, the period between the time of the addition of 1 µM ACh and the time at which the maximum contraction was reached showed no interstrain differences (257 ± 34 s for C3H/HeJ mice, 249 ± 23 s for A/J mice, and 253 ± 17 s for Balb/C mice, n = 8 mice, Fig. 3B).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Airway contraction velocity and time to maximum airway contraction in 3 different mouse strains. A: contraction velocity was calculated as decrease in cross-sectional area/time in the first 10 s after the addition of 1 µM ACh. Airways of C3H/HeJ mice contracted significantly faster than those of A/J and Balb/C mice. *P < 0.05 vs. A/J and Balb/C. B: time from the addition of 1 µM ACh until the maximum airway contraction was reached showed no interstrain differences.

 

Influence of halothane on airway contractility. To test whether halothane, a volatile anesthetic that had been previously administered to mice to perform in vivo measurements of bronchial hyperreactivity (15), could have impaired the contractile response to ACh, airways in lung slices of C3H/HeJ mice were exposed to halothane before exposure to 100 nM ACh (Fig. 4A). In these experiments, we found that halothane itself initially induced a transient airway contraction that was followed by relaxation. However, more importantly, with subsequent exposure to ACh and in the presence of halothane, the airway contractile response was significantly reduced compared with the reduction in lumen size without the pretreatment with halothane (Fig. 4B). The effectiveness of halothane at antagonizing the ACh response was concentration dependent; 0.17 mM halothane reduced the contraction to 81.3 ± 20.3%, whereas 1.7 mM halothane reduced the contraction response to ACh to 7.6 ± 3.9% (n = 5 slices, P < 0.05, Fig. 4B).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of halothane on ACh-induced airway contraction. A:an airway in a lung slice cut from a C3H/HeJ mouse exposed to 1.7 mM halothane displayed a brief contraction that was followed by relaxation. Subsequent exposure of the same airway to 0.1 µM ACh induced only a small contraction. B: maximal contraction of airways from C3H/HeJ mice induced by 0.1 µM ACh after prior application of different concentrations of halothane was measured and expressed as percentage of the contraction displayed by the control group (no prior exposure to halothane). Halothane significantly reduced the contractile response to ACh. *P < 0.05 vs. 0.85 and 1.7 mM halothane. Each group consisted of 5 different slices.

 

ACh-induced Ca2+ signaling in airway SMCs. To correlate the Ca2+ signaling in the SMCs with the airway contractile response, lungs slices were loaded with the Ca2+ indicator dye Oregon green and examined with confocal microscopy. With this technique, the SMCs surrounding the airways were readily identified. The use of a small ROI and confocal microscopy ensured that the fluorescence changes monitored arose from a narrow plane centered on the middle of the SMC (Fig. 5). Although the optical sectioning achieved with confocal microscopy was sufficient to exclude fluorescence from other cells within the lung slice, the optical section was not sufficiently thin to discriminate fluorescence emanating from different locations within individual SMCs. In addition, to compensate for the contractile movement of SMC, the position of the ROI was carefully tracked and manually adjusted, frame by frame, to remain in the same relative location within the SMC. Although this procedure does not fully compensate for changes in path length, Ca2+ oscillations can still be clearly observed because these are associated with relative changes in fluorescence.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. A series of confocal pseudo-color images showing the stimulation of Ca2+ oscillations in airway smooth muscle cells (SMCs) by ACh. The airway is lined with epithelial cells (*) that separate the airway lumen (AL) from an underlying adjacent SMC (arrow). In response to 1 µM ACh, the intracellular free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) was increased in the SMC but not in the epithelial cells. The time after the addition of ACh is given under each panel. The SMC displayed Ca2+ oscillations as indicated by the alternating changes in [Ca2+]i (pseudo-color) with time.

 

In all three mouse strains examined, the Ca2+ response of the SMCs to ACh consisted of an initial transient increase in [Ca2+]i followed by a series of Ca2+ oscillations (Figs. 5 and 6). In keeping with our previous studies (1), no evidence was observed to suggest that the Ca2+ oscillations within each SMC were coordinated with the response of adjacent cells.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Ca2+ signaling induced by ACh in airway SMCs in lung slices from 3 different mouse strains. Regions of interest were defined in single airway SMCs, and Ca2+ changes in response to 1 µM ACh are expressed as a fluorescence ratio (F/F0). In Balb/C (A), A/J (B), and C3H/HeJ (C) mice, the Ca2+ response consisted of an initial Ca2+ transient followed by Ca2+ oscillations.

 

The initial Ca2+ transient (the %difference between the F/F0 measured immediately before and at maximum value of the Ca2+ transient) was concentration dependent from 1 nM to 10 µM, but no differences between mouse strains could be observed (Fig. 7A). Similarly, the frequency of the Ca2+ oscillations induced by ACh showed a concentration dependency. The Ca2+ oscillations increased from a rate of ~10 min-1 in response to 10 nM ACh to ~20 min-1 in response to 100 nM ACh (Fig. 7b). This increase in the Ca2+ oscillation rate corresponds to the same concentration range for increases in airway contraction. The Ca2+ oscillation frequency reached a maximum at concentrations >100 nM. However, there appeared to be no difference between the concentration-response curves for the frequencies of the Ca2+ oscillations between mouse strains.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Comparison of the initial Ca2+ transient and the Ca2+ oscillation frequency between 3 different mouse strains. A: initial Ca2+ transient (%difference between the F/F0 measured immediately before and at maximum value of the Ca2+ transient) was concentration dependent from 1 nM to 1 µM ACh in all strains, but no differences between strains could be detected. B: frequency of the Ca2+ oscillations was concentration dependent from 10 nM to 100 nM ACh and reached maximum frequencies at concentrations of 100 nM to 10 µM ACh. However, no interstrain differences could be observed.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
In the present study, we have investigated the hypothesis that altered Ca2+ signaling within airway SMCs may be responsible for airway hyperreactivity. To test this idea, the contractile and Ca2+ response of airways in thin lung slices from different mouse strains in response to ACh were examined with phase-contrast and confocal microscopy.

The mouse strains used for this study were chosen based on previous studies that ordered the hyperreactivity of mouse airways (15). The A/J mouse was reported to have the most hyperreactive airways, whereas the C3H/HeJ mouse was reported to have the least reactive airways. Consequently, we chose to examine these two mouse strains, rather than conducting a full survey of all mouse strains because they represented the two extremes of airway hyperreactivity and might therefore be expected to show the greatest differences in their cellular responses. The Balb/C mouse showed a "normal" response, (greater than A/J but less than C3H/HeJ) and has been the subject of our earlier studies, making it an ideal choice for the control response.

In this study, we found that the in vitro airway reactivity could be graded in the order C3H/HeJ > A/J = Balb/C. However, this is in contrast to studies reporting an in vivo order of A/J > Balb/C > C3H/HeJ (6, 7, 15). This is an important difference, and there are several possible explanations. A major consideration is that, in the study of Levitt and Mitzner (15), the volatile anesthetic halothane was used to anesthetize mice to successfully perform lung function tests. However, Pabelick et al. (19) subsequently reported that halothane could interfere with the Ca2+ signaling in airway SMCs by emptying the Ca2+ stores within the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Similarly, we have previously shown that halothane abolishes Ca2+ oscillations induced by ACh and induces airway relaxation (1). More importantly, we have found in this study that the prior exposure of the lung slices to halothane significantly attenuated the airway response to ACh. We therefore propose that the use of halothane in the earlier in vivo studies probably impaired the efficacy of the ACh to induce contraction, and that this may explain why the order of airway reactivity originally reported differs to the order reported here.

A second potential complication in all of the in vivo studies on airway reactivity is that the agonist used [ACh or methacholine (MCh)] was administered intravenously and therefore exhibited its effects indirectly through the systemic circulation. The physiological consequences of this approach are not clear but may include alterations in pulmonary blood flow and lung compliance. In this respect, the use of lung slices may have the advantage that the agonist has direct access to the SMCs.

A difference between in vivo and in vitro studies has also been reported by Duguet et al. (7). In this study, it was found that the in vivo airway responsiveness to intravenous MCh was in the order of A/J > Balb/C > C3H/HeJ and matched that of Levitt and Mitzner (15). By contrast, the in vitro response, measured with the use of lung slices, revealed that sensitivity to MCh was greater in C3H/HeJ than in A/J mice (7) even though there was no difference between the mouse strains with respect to the maximal contraction achieved. However, Duguet et al. also found that the velocity of the SMC shortening during contraction was higher in A/J than in C3H/HeJ mice. Because the order of the velocity of shortening matched the order of the in vivo classification, Duguet et al. proposed this parameter to be the most relevant in measuring hyperreactivity.

In our study, using ACh, we have found that the order of the contractile velocity matches the order of the maximal airway contraction (i.e., C3H/HeJ > A/J mice = Balb/C). Thus both shortening velocity and maximal contraction are increased in the C3H/HeJ and both are likely to contribute to hyperreactivity. A reason for these different findings may be that there is a variation in the subtype selectivity of the muscarinic receptors in response to MCh, a chemical analog of ACh (27). MCh is frequently used in clinical tests because it is less readily metabolized and therefore it may produce saturating effects. The ability of the airways to reach the same maximal contraction, although at different rates, is consistent with this idea.

Another explanation for the differences between studies is the thickness of the slices used for the in vitro experiments (0.5-1 mm compared with 75 µm thick in this study) and the concentrations of agarose used to stiffen the lung tissue for the cutting process (1% compared with 2% in our study). Although the absence of agarose in the airway lumen discounts the possibility that the airway cannot fully contract, aga- rose in the alveoli is likely to affect the elastic recoil forces of the slices that tend to resist SMC contraction. However, because we have used the same technique for three different mouse strains, it is reasonable to suggest that the recoil forces would be affected similarly in each case. Therefore, a change in the agarose concentration might be expected to change the absolute degree of contraction of each mouse. However, by comparing the response of three mouse strains in one study, we can conclude that the differences in contractility are the result of differences between mouse strains rather than due to differences in technique. A change in agarose concentration would not be expected to change the order of reactivity.

A difference in airway SMC mass between the mouse strains may also explain the differences in airway hyperreactivity. However, Duguet et al. (7) reported that A/J and C3H/HeJ mice had a similar quantity of tracheal SMCs and myosin content. Thus an increased SMC mass does not seem to be an explanation. As mentioned above, the compliance of the lung tissue of C3H/HeJ mice could be higher than that of other mice, and this would result in a greater reduction of airway caliber for the same contractile force exhibited by the airway SMCs. A survey of lung compliance between mouse strains may address this issue, but this is beyond the scope of this study.

Although it is clear that we consistently found differences in the contractile responses of the airways, we were unable to identify any major differences in the basic Ca2+ signaling responses of the SMCs between mouse strains. Both the initial transient increase in Ca2+ and the initiation of the Ca2+ oscillations were similar in all three strains. Furthermore, the concentration response of the increase in Ca2+ oscillation frequency with ACh was not significantly different.

Although there appeared to be no differences between the Ca2+ responses of the different mouse strains, these results remain important because some basic conclusions about Ca2+ signaling in airway SMCs can be drawn from these data. The increase in the frequency of the Ca2+ oscillations correlates with the increase in airway contraction (compare Fig. 2D with Fig. 7B) in all three strains. This supports the hypothesis that the sustained airway contraction is determined by the frequency of the Ca2+ oscillations (1, 2). The results also emphasize the difference between the smooth dynamics of the contractile response of the airway compared with the oscillatory response for [Ca2+]i of the SMCs. This is particularly evident during steady-state contraction, where Ca2+ oscillations occur without additional changes in airway area. The implication of this correlation is that, during ACh stimulation, the contractile state of the SMC does not simply reflect the Ca2+ concentration of the cytosol. This supports the idea that the contractile machinery of the SMCs serves to time average or integrate the Ca2+ oscillations. During the initial contraction, there is an additional component to the Ca2+ response: an initial transient Ca2+ increase. We have previously suggested that the initial Ca2+ transient serves to initiate contraction, whereas the Ca2+ oscillations serve to maintain the contracted state (1).

An additional factor contributing to the contractile dynamics of the airway is that the airway is a multicellular structure and shortening of several SMCs leads to airway constriction. Perhaps, contrary to the initial impression, this compound architecture actually emphasizes the advantages of studying airways in slices to elucidate pulmonary physiology. For example, the effective amount of contraction displayed by a SMC in response to an agonist can only be determined if the extrinsic resistant forces to shortening, i.e., connective tissue, are present. Similarly, relaxation can only be evaluated if the SMC can be stretched. Furthermore, the contribution of each SMC to airway constriction can only be evaluated if the airway is intact. With respect to Ca2+ signaling, confocal microscopy clearly shows that a contracted airway has several SMCs displaying asynchronous Ca2+ oscillations, but the individual SMCs do not display "twitching" in association with their Ca2+ oscillations. Thus, with the lung slice, the in situ responses of individual cells acting cooperatively can be studied.

The similarity of the Ca2+ responses between SMCs in different mouse strains also suggests that the elements and dynamics of the Ca2+ signaling machinery of airway SMCs, for example, muscarinic receptors, IP3 production, IP3 receptors, and internal Ca2+ stores, are also similar. As a result, the idea that a differential compartmentalization of the Ca2+ stores is an explanation for the differences in hyperreactivity of mouse strains seems less likely (21).

In contrast to our results, Tao et al. (25) found increased Ca2+ mobilization in airway SMCs from hyperreactive rats. In their study, SMCs were isolated from the trachea rather than from lower airways and Ca2+ measurements were performed on cultured SMCs. This may be problematic because it has been shown that the response of cultured airway SMCs to stimulation of muscarinic receptors is altered (10, 28). Additionally, the use of different species (rat vs. mouse) and agonists (5-HT vs. ACh) complicates direct comparison of the results.

The fact that airway contractility is increased in C3H/HeJ mice but the Ca2+ signaling in the SMCs appears to be similar to that in other mice leads us to the conclusion that an increased Ca2+ sensitivity of the contractile apparatus in SMCs of hyperreactive mice could also account for stronger airway contraction. Jiang et al. (14) found that the sensitization of dog airways increased the myosin light-chain kinase content and therefore myosin light-chain phosphorylation in the bronchial SMCs. Although intrinsic hyperreactivity rather than sensitization was assessed in our study, this may be a mechanism for how similar Ca2+ signals induce stronger contraction.

In summary, we have correlated airway reactivity to ACh in three different mouse strains with ACh-induced Ca2+ signaling. Although differences in airway reactivity could be demonstrated, no difference in the Ca2+ signaling, including the initial Ca2+ transient and the frequency of the subsequent Ca2+ oscillations, could be detected. As a result, we hypothesize that the mechanism responsible for airway hyperreactivity in different mouse strains resides with the Ca2+ sensitivity of the contractile apparatus of the SMCs rather than with the Ca2+ signaling itself. In addition, we believe these results are important as they underscore the need for a better understanding of in vivo vs. in vitro responses and emphasize the need for caution in the use of these hyperreactive mouse models.


    DISCLOSURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-49288.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Present address of A. Bergner: Pneumology, Medizinische Klinik Innenstadt der LMU-München, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336 Munich, Germany.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. J. Sanderson, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave. North, Worcester, MA 01655 (E-mail: michael.sanderson{at}umassmed.edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Bergner A and Sanderson MJ. Acetylcholine-induced calcium signaling and contraction of airway smooth muscle cells in lung slices. J Gen Physiol 119: 187-198, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bergner A and Sanderson MJ. ATP stimulates Ca2+ oscillations and contraction in airway smooth muscle cells of mouse lung slices. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 283: L1271- L1279, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Black JL and Johnson PR. Airway smooth muscle in asthma. Respirology 1: 153-158, 1996.[Medline]
  4. Bootman MD, Collins TJ, Peppiatt CM, Prothero LS, MacKenzie L, De Smet P, Travers M, Tovey SC, Seo JT, Berridge MJ, Ciccolini F, and Lipp P. Calcium signalling—an overview. Semin Cell Dev Biol 12: 3-10, 2001.[ISI][Medline]
  5. Dandurand RJ, Wang CG, Phillips NC, and Eidelman DH. Responsiveness of individual airways to methacholine in adult rat lung explants. J Appl Physiol 75: 364-372, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Drazen JM, Finn PW, and De Sanctis GT. Mouse models of airway responsiveness: physiological basis of observed outcomes and analysis of selected examples using these outcome indicators. Annu Rev Physiol 61: 593-625, 1999.[ISI][Medline]
  7. Duguet A, Biyah K, Minshall E, Gomes R, Wang CG, Taoudi-Benchekroun M, Bates JH, and Eidelman DH. Bronchial responsiveness among inbred mouse strains. Role of airway smooth-muscle shortening velocity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161: 839-848, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Gunst SJ and Tang DD. The contractile apparatus and mechanical properties of airway smooth muscle. Eur Respir J 15: 600-616, 2000.[Abstract]
  9. Hall IP. Second messengers, ion channels and pharmacology of airway smooth muscle. Eur Respir J 15: 1120-1127, 2000.[Abstract]
  10. Hall IP and Kotlikoff M. Use of cultured airway myocytes for study of airway smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 268: L1-L11, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hirst SJ, Walker TR, and Chilvers ER. Phenotypic diversity and molecular mechanisms of airway smooth muscle proliferation in asthma. Eur Respir J 16: 159-177, 2000.[Abstract]
  12. James A and Carroll N. Airway smooth muscle in health and disease: methods of measurement and relation to function. Eur Respir J 15: 782-789, 2000.[Abstract]
  13. Janssen LJ. Ionic mechanisms and Ca2+ regulation in airway smooth muscle contraction: do the data contradict dogma? Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 282: L1161-L1178, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Jiang H, Rao K, Halayko AJ, Liu X, and Stephens NL. Ragweed sensitization-induced increase of myosin light chain kinase content in canine airway smooth muscle. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 7: 567-573, 1992.
  15. Levitt RC and Mitzner W. Expression of airway hyperreactivity to acetylcholine as a simple autosomal recessive trait in mice. FASEB J 2: 2605-2608, 1988.[Abstract]
  16. Levitt RC and Mitzner W. Autosomal recessive inheritance of airway hyperreactivity to 5-hydroxytryptamine. J Appl Physiol 67: 1125-1132, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Martin C, Uhlig S, and Ullrich V. Videomicroscopy of methacholine-induced contraction of individual airways in precision- cut lung slices. Eur Respir J 9: 2479-2487, 1996.[Abstract]
  18. Nadel JA and Busse WW. Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 157: S130-S138, 1998.
  19. Pabelick CM, Prakash YS, Kannan MS, Jones KA, Warner DO, and Sieck GC. Effect of halothane on intracellular calcium oscillations in porcine tracheal smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 276: L81-L89, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Pabelick CM, Sieck GC, and Prakash YS. Invited Review: Significance of spatial and temporal heterogeneity of calcium transients in smooth muscle. J Appl Physiol 91: 488-496, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Parameswaran K, Janssen LJ, and O'Byrne PM. Airway hyperresponsiveness and calcium handling by smooth muscle: a "deeper look." Chest 121: 621-624, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Placke ME and Fisher GL. Adult peripheral lung organ culture—a model for respiratory tract toxicology. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 90: 284-298, 1987.[ISI][Medline]
  23. Sanderson MJ and Parker I. Video-rate confocal microscopy. In: Methods in Enzymology, edited by Parker GMI. San Diego, CA: Academic, 2002, p. 447-480.
  24. Stephens NL. Airway smooth muscle. Lung 179: 333-373, 2001.[ISI][Medline]
  25. Tao FC, Tolloczko B, Eidelman DH, and Martin JG. Enhanced Ca2+ mobilization in airway smooth muscle contributes to airway hyperresponsiveness in an inbred strain of rat. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160: 446-453, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Tao FC, Tolloczko B, Mitchell CA, Powell WS, and Martin JG. Inositol (1,4,5)trisphosphate metabolism and enhanced calcium mobilization in airway smooth muscle of hyperresponsive rats. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 23: 514-520, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Tulic MK, Wale JL, Petak F, and Sly PD. Muscarinic blockade of methacholine induced airway and parenchymal lung responses in anaesthetised rats. Thorax 54: 531-537, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Widdop S, Daykin K, and Hall IP. Expression of muscarinic M2 receptors in cultured human airway smooth muscle cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 9: 541-546, 1993.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A. D. Chew, J. A. Hirota, R. Ellis, J. Wattie, M. D. Inman, and L. J. Janssen
Effects of allergen on airway narrowing dynamics as assessed by lung-slice technique
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2008; 31(3): 532 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
M. J. Sanderson, P. Delmotte, Y. Bai, and J. F. Perez-Zogbhi
Regulation of Airway Smooth Muscle Cell Contractility by Ca2+ Signaling and Sensitivity
Proceedings of the ATS, January 1, 2008; 5(1): 23 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
S. Hirota, P. Helli, and L. J. Janssen
Ionic mechanisms and Ca2+ handling in airway smooth muscle
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2007; 30(1): 114 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. Landsman, C. Varol, and S. Jung
Distinct Differentiation Potential of Blood Monocyte Subsets in the Lung
J. Immunol., February 15, 2007; 178(4): 2000 - 2007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Duracher, F.-X. Blanc, P.-Y. Gueugniaud, J. S. David, B. Riou, Y. Lecarpentier, and C. Coirault
The Effects of Isoflurane on Airway Smooth Muscle Crossbridge Kinetics in Fisher and Lewis Rats
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2005; 101(1): 136 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
J. F. Perez and M. J. Sanderson
The Frequency of Calcium Oscillations Induced by 5-HT, ACH, and KCl Determine the Contraction of Smooth Muscle Cells of Intrapulmonary Bronchioles
J. Gen. Physiol., May 31, 2005; 125(6): 535 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
J. F. Perez and M. J. Sanderson
The Contraction of Smooth Muscle Cells of Intrapulmonary Arterioles Is Determined by the Frequency of Ca2+ Oscillations Induced by 5-HT and KCl
J. Gen. Physiol., May 31, 2005; 125(6): 555 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/3/1325    most recent
00272.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bergner, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bergner, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, M. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Physiological Society.