Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 95: 1259-1265, 2003. First published June 13, 2003; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01028.2002
8750-7587/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/3/1259    most recent
01028.2002v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lamont, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kalhan, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lamont, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kalhan, S. C.

Gender differences in the regulation of amino acid metabolism

Linda S. Lamont,1 Arthur J. McCullough,2 and Satish C. Kalhan2

1Exercise Science Program, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island 02881; and 2The Schwartz Center for Metabolism and Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine at MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44109

Submitted 11 November 2002 ; accepted in final form 9 June 2003


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 REFERENCES
 
Exercising men, compared with women, have a greater increase in leucine oxidation but not lysine rate of appearance. The cause for this sexual dimorphism is unknown; however, an inhibition of {beta}-adrenoreceptor activity has previously been shown to mediate amino acid metabolism (Lamont LS, McCullough AJ, and Kalhan SC. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 268: E910-E916, 1995; Lamont LS, Patel DG, and Kalhan SC. J Appl Physiol 67: 221-225, 1989). This study was a gender comparison of leucine and lysine kinetics during a {beta}-adrenoreceptor blockade ({beta}1,{beta}2-blockade) and a placebo control by using a double-blind crossover protocol. Subjects exercised at 50% of their trial-specific maximal O2 consumption (1 h) after 7 days of dietary control. During exercise with {beta}-blockade, men had an increased nonprotein respiratory exchange ratio (P < 0.001), whereas women had an increased circulation of free fatty acids (P < 0.001). The genders also displayed distinct differences in exercise amino acid kinetics. The men, but not the women, increased leucine oxidation (P < 0.005) and lysine rate of appearance (P < 0.009) when exercising during {beta}-adrenergic blockade. This study indicates that during {beta}-blockade, exercising men increase their need for amino acids (and carbohydrate) to fuel energy needs, whereas women increase their mobilization of fat, thereby requiring less alternative fuels such as carbohydrate and amino acids. Gender-specific fuel preferences during exercise are regulated by {beta}-adrenergic-receptor activity. Substrate availability during exercise appears to modulate the amino acid oxidation differences between genders.

L-[1-13C] leucine; L-[{alpha}-15N] lysine; prolonged exercise; {beta}-adrenergic blockade


MANY STUDIES INDICATE THAT there are gender-specific fuel preferences during exercise, with differences being reported in the contribution of fat, carbohydrate, and amino acids to total body energy needs (3, 7, 9, 13-15, 17, 18, 21, 22). The regulatory mechanism(s) for these gender-based differences in exercise fuel preference remains unknown, but there are studies to indicate that substrate metabolism can be influence by the female sex hormones (23). With respect to amino acid metabolism, endurance exercise has been shown to cause a greater increase in leucine oxidation but not lysine rate of appearance in men compared with women (9, 14, 17). The cause for this gender difference in leucine oxidation has not been attributable to differences within skeletal muscle, such as percent activation of muscle branched-chain 2-oxoacid dehydrogenase (14). Rather, it appears to be a compensatory response to fuel availability. Women derive more of their exercise energy needs from fat, thereby requiring less alternative fuels, such as amino acids and carbohydrate (9). Whether this sexual dimorphism in whole body amino acid metabolism can be mediated by {beta}-adrenergic-receptor activity has not been studied.

Men may typically have heightened {beta}-adrenergic-receptor stimulation during exercise due to a greater circulating epinephrine and norepinephrine level that has been reported in some (7, 13, 21) but not all studies (15, 18). Despite these reports of gender differences in {beta}-receptor stimulation during exercise, there are no comparative studies of {beta}-adrenergic regulation of amino acid metabolism. However, previous human studies do indicate that whole body amino acid metabolism can be mediated with an inhibition of {beta}-adrenergic-receptor activity (8, 10). Specifically, when subjects of both genders were exercised in the presence of a {beta}-adrenergic-receptor blockade, there were dramatic increases in leucine oxidation and lysine rate of appearance (8). These previous studies did not compare or isolate specific gender responses (8, 10). Therefore, the purpose of this experiment was to determine whether there are gender differences in the {beta}-adrenergic-receptor regulation of leucine and, for comparison purposes, lysine metabolism.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects. Eight healthy, nonsmoking, individuals were recruited for this experiment. A physician performed a physical examination on all subjects to confirm that there were no medical reasons for their exclusion from this study. All subjects had normal electrocardiograms and were without a family or personal history of diabetes mellitus. The menstrual cycle phase has been shown to alter leucine kinetics in women (11). Therefore, the female subjects were studied during the follicular phase of their menstrual cycle (days 1-13) to reduce any confounding effects of their cycle. The follicular phase was determined by counting days from the onset of menses along with the use of a monoclonal antibody self-test kit (Ovukit, Quidel San Diego, CA). Male and female subjects were matched according to their age, exercise habits, and maximal oxygen consumption [O2 max; women = 43 ± 5.4 vs. men = 48 ± 6.0 ml · kg-1 · min-1; P = not significant (NS)] as well as body weight (see Table 2). Our human experimentation review board approved this project, and written, informed consent was obtained from each subject before participation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Physical characteristics of the female and male subjects

 

Dietary and pharmacological procedures. A registered dietitian designed standardized 1-wk meal plans for all subjects using dietary exchange procedures (4). An exchange list for meal planning was given to each subject along with specific menu ideas. The subjects repeated this weekly meal plan twice: once while ingesting a placebo (twice a day) and once while ingesting a {beta}1,{beta}2-adrenergic blocking agent (propranolol, 80 mg twice a day). Both pills were formulated to be the same color and size and were distributed in a random, double-blind manner. A drug washout period of a minimum of 1 wk was interspersed between trials.

These meal plans were designed to be weight maintaining and employed standard metabolic equations to determine daily energy needs (2, 5). The specific Harris-Benedict equation used to determine resting energy expenditure was as follows: women = 655 + (9.6 x weight) + (1.8 x height) - (4.7 x age) and men = 66 + (13.7 x weight) + (5 x height) - (6.8 x age). Each subject was required to maintain a daily dietary logbook. The dietary macronutrient composition was controlled in both genders and was 58-60% carbohydrate, 30% fat, and 10-12% protein. Daily caloric intake was 1,753 ± 89 kcal in the women (7,339 ± 373 kJ) and 2,563 ± 108 kcal in the men (10,731 ± 452 kJ). The dietary protein content was 1 g protein · kg-1 · day-1 for both groups. Compliance with these dietary procedures was evaluated with a written 1-wk dietary logbook.

O2 max· O2 max was determined on day 4 or 5 of each trial with the use of a graded, cycle ergometry protocol. Therefore, each subject was O2 max tested twice to calculate a trial-specific submaximal workload for the subsequent infusion study. O2 max was assessed with a metabolic cart that was calibrated with a standard gas mixture (model 2900, Sensor Medics, Yorba Linda, CA). O2 max was assumed if there was a plateau in oxygen uptake (O2) and/or a respiratory exchange ratio (RER) that exceeded one at maximal exercise.

Tracer infusion studies. To avoid an acute exercise recovery effect on leucine or lysine kinetics, the subjects were instructed to refrain from physical activity for 2 days before each infusion. The subjects reported to the Clinical Research Center (Case Western Reserve University) in a postabsorptive state (~15 h) on the morning of day 7 for both trials. Before each infusion, an intravenous cannula was placed into a superficial vein in each hand. One cannula was used for the tracer infusions of L-[1-13C]leucine (99 atom %excess of 13C), L-[{alpha}-15N]lysine (99 atom %excess of 15N), and sodium bicarbonate NaH[13C]O3 (99 atom %excess of 13C) (Merck, Dorval, Canada). All tracers were tested for sterility and pyrogenicity before the infusion and were weighed, dissolved in normal saline, and filtered (Micropore filter, 0.22 µm). The second intravenous cannula was used for blood sample collections and was kept patent with a saline infusion (10 ml/h). This sampling site was warmed to obtain arterialized venous blood.

Priming doses of the isotopes were administered to reach an early isotopic steady-state and were 1.2 µmol/kg of NaH13CO3, 4.0 µmol/kg of L-[1-13C]leucine, and 6.8 µmol/kg of L-[{alpha}-15N]lysine. These priming doses were followed by a constant-rate infusion of labeled leucine at 5.0 µmol · kg-1 · h-1 and of lysine at 7.0 µmol · kg-1 · h-1. A background sample of expired air and venous blood was obtained from each subject before both experiments were begun. A weighed amount of labeled water [H218O, 99 atom %excess of 18O; MSD Isotopes] was orally given to assess total body water.

Tracer infusion during rest. The first 3 h of each infusion protocol included a supine rest that was used to obtain an isotopic plateau for the determination of resting leucine and lysine kinetics (8, 9). During this rest period, the venous blood samples were withdrawn every 30 min. These blood samples were immediately centrifuged, and the plasma was stored at -70°C for later biochemical analyses. Breath samples were collected every 30 min by using a Hans-Rudolph, one-way non-rebreathing valve that was connected to a 5-liter anesthesia bag. An aliquot of each breath sample was trapped in an evacuated glass tube for the subsequent analysis of 13CO2. CO2 production (CO2) and O2 were determined continuously throughout rest. Leucine and lysine kinetics were calculated by using an averaged isotopic enrichment value (180 min of rest).

Tracer infusion during exercise. After 3 h of supine rest, each subject began exercising at 50% of his or her trial-specific O2 max (workloads were specific for the placebo and {beta}-blockade trial). A constant-load, pan-weight Monark cycle ergometer was used (Varberg, Sweden). Blood samples were withdrawn at 0, 15, 30, 45, 50, 55, and 60 min of exercise. Heart rates were determined during rest and throughout exercise at 20, 30, 40, 45, 50, and 60 min. O2 and CO2 were continuously monitored with a Hans-Rudolph adult face mask that was interfaced with the metabolic cart. Aliquots of breath samples were trapped in an evacuated glass tube at 0, 5, 13, 27, 43, 50, 55, and 57 min of exercise for the subsequent determination of 13CO2 enrichment. With this steady-state exercise procedure, there was an isotopic plateau in plasma [{alpha}-13C]ketoisocaproate ({alpha}-KIC) enrichments between 40 and 60 min of exercise (see Table 1). An averaged isotopic enrichment value was used to calculate amino acid kinetics during exercise (40-60 min of exercise).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. [{alpha}-13C]KIC enrichments for both groups

 

Analytic methods. Plasma free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations were determined according to Laurell and Tebbling (12). Total plasma protein concentration was measured with a refractometer (model SPR-T2, Atago). The percent increase in plasma protein concentration during exercise was used to correct FFA concentrations for fluid volume shifts (19). Total 24-h urine volumes were collected on day 6 of each experiment, and urinary urea nitrogen excretion was determined with a colorimetric assay (640A, Sigma Chemical).

The method of Adams (1) was used to perform plasma derivatizations, and the n-propyl N-acetyl ester was used for the subsequent quantitative analyses (1). The analytic methods employed to determine the [13C]leucine and expired 13CO2 enrichments have been described elsewhere (8-10). Plasma {alpha}-KIC and lysine enrichments were measured with a Hewlett-Packard model 5985A gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer with selective ion-monitoring software. Selected ion monitoring was performed at a mass-to-charge ratio of 273/274 for lysine and of 174/175 for {alpha}-KIC. The expired CO2 was separated from each breath sample by cryogenic distillation, and the 13CO2- o-12CO2 ratio was measured on an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (8-10).

Calculations. Leucine kinetic calculations were corrected for background enrichment of expired CO2 as well as for bicarbonate retention. The background enrichment of expired 13CO2 was measured before each infusion. This background enrichment was subtracted from the isotopic plateau to calculate leucine kinetics (10). {beta}-Blockade had no measurable effect on the 13C enrichment of CO2 (%13Cplacebo = 1.0871 ± 0.0005 vs. %13C{beta}-blockade = 1.0878 ± 0.0005) (n = 8). Therefore, no correction was made to breath CO2 because of {beta}-blockade. Leucine oxidation was corrected for bicarbonate retention as previously described (8). Body composition measures were determined by using the H218O tracer dilution method (20). Total body water and fat-free mass (FFM) were calculated with this labeled-water technique. An isotopic plateau for expired C18O2 was achieved within 3 h (9, 20).

Data analyses. Steady-state tracer kinetic equations were used to calculate leucine and lysine kinetics. The reciprocal pool model was used for the leucine kinetic calculations. The statistical analyses for this study included the three-way analysis of variance (gender x treatment x time) for leucine and lysine metabolism, RER, and blood measures. Time was a repeated measure. Statistical techniques also included the two-way analysis of variance for O2 max, resting heart rates, and urinary urea nitrogen (gender x treatment). When a significant main effect was found, pairwise comparisons were performed with a Newman-Keuls post hoc test. A probability value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical power for these data at an {alpha} of 0.05 included leucine kinetics (0.81), lysine kinetics (0.98), indirect calorimetry (0.96), urinary urea nitrogen (0.95), and circulating free fatty acids (0.96). Values are means ± SE.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects. Table 2 indicates that there was no difference between genders in age, body weight, or body mass index (BMI). There was no significant change in body weight due to the treatments or throughout the duration of the experiment (P = NS). As expected, the men had a larger FFM (P < 0.007), and the women had a larger percent body fat (P < 0.05). O2 max did not change due to the administration of the {beta}-blocking drug (womenplacebo = 42.8 ± 5.42 and women{beta}-blocked = 36.0 ± 4.24; menplacebo = 47.7 ± 6.04 and men{beta}-blocked = 43.4 ± 3.74 ml·kg-1·min-1; P = NS). All subjects exhibited a significant reduction in {beta}-adrenergic stimulation during the {beta}-blockade trial as demonstrated by the decrease in resting heart rate (menplacebo = 65.7 ± 2.45 and men{beta}-blocked = 50.5 ± 1.32 beats/min; womenplacebo = 65.5 ± 6.3 and women{beta}-blocked = 56.5 ± 3.0 beats/min; P < 0.002). When both groups exercised in the presence of a {beta}-blockade, the heart rates were significantly lower at all exercise time points (P < 0.001).

Expired gas measurements during submaximal exercise. Figure 1 displays the mean nonprotein RER values for both trials and both genders. The RER was found to exhibit a significant gender (P < 0.001), a significant treatment (P < 0.04), and a significant exercise effect (P < 0.01). Therefore, the RER values were significantly greater in the men compared with the women and significantly increased as a result of {beta}-blocker administration. In the men, the RER during exercise was increased from rest during the {beta}-blockade trial (P < 0.05). There was no significant gender x exercise interaction for the RER (P = NS).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Nonprotein respiratory exchange ratios for both genders during both trials A: women. B: men. Values are means ± SE. **Significant main effect for gender, P < 0.001. *Significant treatment effect, P < 0.04. +Significantly different from rest, P < 0.05.

 

FFA and urinary urea nitrogen concentrations. There was a significant gender (P < 0.001) and treatment (P < 0.03) effect on FFA concentration. Figure 2 indicates that, during both trials, the FFA concentrations were greater in the women compared with the men (P < 0.05). Additionally, during the {beta}-blockade trial, the women had a heightened FFA concentration compared with their placebo control trial (P < 0.05). There was no gender x treatment interaction effect for FFAs (P = NS).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Circulating free fatty acid concentrations for both genders during both trials. Values are means ± SE. **Significant main effect for gender, P < 0.001. *Significant treatment effect, P < 0.05.

 

Urinary urea nitrogen excretion displayed a significant treatment effect. There was a significant increase in urinary urea nitrogen excretion during the {beta}-blockade trial (placebo = 0.12 ± 0.02 vs. {beta}-blockade = 0.17 ± 0.02 g · kg body wt-1 · 24 h-1; P < 0.005). There was no gender difference in urinary urea nitrogen excretion (P = NS).

Leucine kinetics. The leucine rate of appearance data (whole body protein breakdown) is located in Table 3. We found no significant gender, treatment, or exercise effect for leucine rate of appearance (P = NS). However, there was a significant gender (P < 0.005), treatment (P < 0.05), and exercise effect (P < 0.001) for leucine oxidation (displayed in Fig. 3). There was also a significant gender x time interaction effect for this measure (P < 0.04). Hence, leucine oxidation was significantly greater in men compared with women and was greater in exercise compared with rest. Women showed no change in exercise leucine oxidation when placebo control was compared with {beta}-blockade, but the men had a heightened exercise leucine oxidation when their {beta}-blockade and control trials were compared (P < 0.05). In addition, leucine oxidation during the {beta}-blockade exercise trial in the men was greater compared with the female {beta}-blockade exercise trial (P < 0.05). Nonoxidative leucine disposal (protein synthesis) demonstrated no gender or treatment effects. However, there was a significant exercise effect (P < 0.002). Table 3 indicates that nonoxidative leucine disposal was significantly reduced during exercise compared with rest (P < 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Mean leucine rate of appearance and nonoxidative disposal

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Leucine oxidation for both genders during both trials. Values are means ± SE. **Significant main effect for gender, P < 0.005. *Significant treatment effect, P < 0.05. +Significantly different from rest, P < 0.05.

 

Lysine kinetics. Figure 4 illustrates the lysine rate of appearance data for both genders during both trials. There was a significant gender effect (P < 0.009) and a gender x treatment interaction for lysine rate of appearance (P < 0.001). During resting conditions, the {beta}-blocked women had a decrease in lysine rate of appearance (P < 0.05), but no change was observed in the men, thereby explaining the gender x treatment interaction. A difference between genders in the direction of change for exercise lysine rate of appearance accounts for the significant gender x treatment interaction. When exercising during {beta}-blockade, the women had a diminished lysine rate of appearance (P < 0.05), but the men had an increased lysine rate of appearance (P < 0.05).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Lysine rate of appearance for both genders during both trials. Values are means ± SE. **Significant main effect for gender, P = 0.009.

++Significant gender x treatment interaction effect, P = 0.001.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 REFERENCES
 
The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether there are gender differences in the regulation of amino acid metabolism during exercise. We compared the response of leucine and lysine kinetics during a {beta}-adrenergic-receptor blockade and a placebo control in pair-matched men and women. These gender pairs were matched on age, aerobic fitness, exercise habits, and body weight. Our subjects were more lean and aerobically fit than average, two factors that are known to influence gender-specific fuel utilization during exercise (15). To eliminate confounding influences on exercise metabolism, the preexperimental diet of our subjects was controlled. A gender difference in the {beta}-adrenergic regulation of whole body amino acid metabolism during moderate-intensity, long-term exercise was found. Specifically, when exercising during a {beta}1,{beta}2-adrenergic-receptor blockade, the men increased their whole body leucine oxidation and lysine rate of appearance, whereas women exhibited no change in leucine oxidation and decreased their lysine rate of appearance.

We previously reported that there were no gender differences in lysine rate of appearance during rest, exercise, or exercise recovery (9). The present study indicates, however, that gender and {beta}-adrenergic activity interact in their regulation of lysine kinetics. During {beta}-adrenergic blockade and rest, lysine rate of appearance decreases in women but remains unchanged in men, thereby explaining the gender x treatment interaction effect. When the subject exercises in the presence of a {beta}-adrenergic blockade, the lysine rate of appearance increases in men but decreases in women, again explaining the gender x treatment interaction. The likely explanation for these findings is that the regulation of lysine kinetics occurs through an interaction between gender-specific sex hormones and {beta}-adrenergic-receptor activity.

These distinct differences in lysine kinetics were accompanied by gender differences in leucine metabolism. Leucine rate of appearance or whole body protein breakdown remained unaffected by gender, {beta}-blockade treatment, or exercise time. Nonoxidative leucine disposal showed a significant main effect for time. Hence, there was a significant decrease in protein synthesis rate in both genders due to exercise. As has previously been reported, we found that the genders differ in whole body leucine oxidation (9, 14, 17). These men, compared with women, had a greater rate of leucine oxidation during endurance exercise. Leucine oxidation further increased in these men but not women when they exercised in the presence of a {beta}-blockade. Exercise in combination with {beta}-adrenergic-receptor blockade has previously been shown to heighten leucine oxidation rate in humans when studied without regard to gender (8, 10). It was concluded that {beta}-adrenergic stimulation downregulates whole body leucine oxidation and that both the {beta}1- and {beta}2-adrenoreceptors mediate this downregulation (8, 10). The present data indicate that in men, compared with women, there was heightened branched-chain amino acid sensitivity to {beta}-adrenergic-receptor inhibition. Whereas men doubled their rate of leucine oxidation when exercising in the presence of a {beta}-blockade, women showed no {beta}-adrenergic effect. This gender dimorphism in leucine oxidation might indicate that there are differences in the regulation of branched-chain 2-oxoacid dehydrogenase. However, previous research has failed to show a gender difference in skeletal muscle activation of branched-chain 2-oxoacid dehydrogenase activation due to exercise (17). To our knowledge, a gender comparison of {beta}-adrenergic-receptor sensitivity of branched-chain 2-oxoacid dehydrogenase activation has not been done. Alternatively, this increased whole body leucine oxidation in our {beta}-blocked men may be a metabolic compensation for the lack of other primary fuel sources (16). Our laboratory previously postulated that increased exercise leucine oxidation during {beta}-blockade might be due to a fuel-mediated effect on whole body metabolism (8, 10). That is, leucine oxidation will be heightened during {beta}-blockade in response to a reduction in other fuel sources such as FFA and glucose (8, 10). Subsequently, another research group has found an increased use of alternative fuels when humans exercised during {beta}-adrenoreceptor blockade (16). They reported a suppression of lipolysis and FFA availability and an increase in glucose rate of disposal (carbohydrate oxidation) when humans exercise in the presence of a {beta}-blockade (16). Unfortunately, a gender comparison was not made in any of these experiments (8, 10, 16). The present study extends previous findings to indicate that men, but not women, have a reduction in lipolysis and hence fat oxidation during {beta}-blockade, thereby increasing their need for alternative fuels such as carbohydrate and amino acids.

This study and others have reported a significant main effect of gender on exercise energy metabolism (3, 7, 9, 13-15, 17, 18, 21, 22). Both animal and human studies have linked gender differences in carbohydrate, fat, and amino acid metabolism during exercise to the female sex hormones (see Ref. 23 for review). It has been reported numerous times that the genders differ in their relative contribution of fat and carbohydrate to exercise energy needs (3, 7, 9, 13-15, 17, 18, 21, 22). Women have a greater reliance on fat, and men a greater reliance on carbohydrate, to fuel long-duration exercise when conducted at similar relative intensities. These data build on those previous studies to indicate that gender-specific fuel regulation can be mediated by {beta}-adrenergic-receptor activity. Men increase their reliance on carbohydrate when exercising in the presence of a {beta}-adrenergic blockade. On the other hand, women are able to increase circulating FFA and fat availability during similar conditions (exercise with {beta}-blockade). Therefore, when {beta}-adrenergic-receptor activity is inhibited, men and women will increase their reliance on their gender-specific preferred fuels (i.e., carbohydrate in men and fat in women). Mittendorfer et al. (15) recently reported that whole body lipolytic rate and plasma FFA availability and uptake are greater in exercising women compared with men. These researchers employed a different methodological approach than ours, however, and matched their subjects according to body fat (adiposity) (15). They speculated that there could be three possible explanations for the higher lipolytic rates in women: increased adipose tissue sensitivity to {beta}-adrenergic stimulation, a decreased {alpha}-adrenergic stimulation, or a combination of these two mechanisms (15). Our data show that women have increased adipose tissue sensitivity to adrenergic-receptor stimulation. It should be noted, however, that there is evidence of {alpha}-adrenergic-receptor activity inhibiting lipolysis during exercise in men but not women (6). Therefore, sexual dimorphism in fat availability during exercise appears to be at least partially mediated by {beta}-adrenergic-receptor activity.

The significance of this study is that it, for first time, indicates that gender-specific preferences for amino acid oxidation during exercise are regulated by {beta}-adrenergic activity. It has been known that amino acids provide a small percentage of energy needs during exercise and that men oxidize more amino acids than women, and these data now indicate that amino acids become an important alternative fuel for men (but not women) during times of substrate deficits. Our data also indicate that women do not need to draw on amino acids as an alternative fuel during {beta}-adrenergic blockade because of an enhanced lipolytic responsiveness.

In summary, there is a sexual dimorphism in the regulation of whole body amino acid metabolism during exercise. Leucine oxidation and lysine rate of appearance during exercise showed a heightened sensitivity to {beta}-adrenergic-receptor blockade in men but not women. This gender dimorphism was probably a compensation for a reduction in primary fuel sources in the men, notably circulating FFA. Moreover, women display an enhanced lipolytic responsiveness to {beta}-adrenergic blockade, thereby sparing alternative fuels. To conclude, gender-specific fuel preferences during exercise are regulated by {beta}-adrenergic-receptor activity. Substrate availability during exercise appears to modulate the amino acid oxidation differences between genders.


    DISCLOSURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 REFERENCES
 
This study was supported by American Heart Association (Dallas, TX) Grant AHA 91007450 and by National Institutes of Health Grants GCRC RR-00080 and HD-11089.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. S. Lamont, 25 West Independence Way, Suite J, Kingston, RI 02881 (E-mail: lla4983u{at}postoffice.uri.edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Adams RF. Determination of amino acid profiles in biological samples by gas chromatography. J Chromatogr 95: 189-212, 1974.[ISI][Medline]
  2. American College of Sports Medicine. Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (5th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1995, p. 269-287.
  3. Blatchford FK, Knowlton RF, and Schneider DA. Plasma FFA responses to prolonged walking in untrained men and women. Eur J Appl Physiol 53: 343-347, 1985.[ISI][Medline]
  4. Franz MJ, Bar P, Holler H, Powers MA, Wheeler ML, and Wylie-Rosett J. Exchange lists: revised 1986. J Am Diet Assoc 87: 28-40, 1987.[ISI][Medline]
  5. Harris JA and Benedict FG. A Biometric Study of Basal Metabolism in Man. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute, 1919. (Publ. no. 279)
  6. Hellstrom Blaak LE and Hagstrom-Toft E. Gender differences in adrenergic regulation of lipid mobilization during exercise. Int J Sports Med 17: 439-447, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
  7. Horton TJ, Pagliassotti MJ, Hobbs K, and Hill JO. Fuel metabolism in men and women during and after long-duration exercise. J Appl Physiol 85: 1823-1832, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lamont LS, McCullough AJ, and Kalhan SC. {beta}-Adrenergic blockade heightens the exercise-induced increase in leucine oxidation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 268: E910-E916, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lamont LS, McCullough AJ, and Kalhan SC. Gender differences in leucine, but not lysine, kinetics. J Appl Physiol 91: 357-362, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lamont LS, Patel DG, and Kalhan SC. {beta}-Adrenergic blockade alters whole-body leucine metabolism in humans. J Appl Physiol 67: 221-225, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Lariviere R, Moussali F, and Garrell DR. Increased leucine flux and lucine oxidation during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 267: E422-E428, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Laurell S and Tebbling G. Colorimetric microdetermination of free fatty acids in plasma. Clin Chim Acta 16: 57-62, 1967.[ISI][Medline]
  13. Mendenhall LA, Sial S, and Coggan AR. Gender differences in substrate metabolism during moderate intensity cycling (Abstract). Med Sci Sports Exerc 27: S213, 1996.
  14. McKenzie S, Phillips SM, Carter SL, Lowther S, Gibala MJ, and Tarapolsky MA. Endurance exercise training attenuates leucine oxidation and BCOAD activation during exercise in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 278: E580-E587, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Mittendorfer B, Horowitz JF, and Klein S. Effect of gender on lipid kinetics during endurance exercise of moderate intensity in untrained subjects. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 283: E58-E65, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Mora-Rodriguez R, Hodgkinson BJ, Byerley LO, and Coyle EF. Effects of {beta}-adrenergic receptor stimulation and blockade on substrate metabolism during submaximal exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 280: E752-E760, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Phillips SM, Atkinson SA, Tarnapolsky MA, and MacDougal JD. Gender differences in leucine kinetics and nitrogen balance in endurance athletes. J Appl Physiol 75: 2134-2141, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Roepstorff C, Steffensen CH, Madsen M, Stallknecht B, Kanstrup IL, Richter EA, and Kiens B. Gender differences in substrate utilization during submaximal exercise in endurance-trained subjects. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 282: E435-E447, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Schlein EM, Jensen D, and Knochel JP. Effect of plasma water loss on assessment of muscle metabolism during exercise. J Appl Physiol 34: 568-572, 1973.[Free Full Text]
  20. Schoeller DA, vanSantene EE, Peterson DW, Dietz W, Jaspan J, and Klein PD. Total body water measurement in humans with 18O- and 2H-labeled water. Am J Clin Nutr 33: 2686-2693, 1980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Steffensen CH, Roepstorff C, Madsen M, and Kiens B. Myocellular triacylglycerol breakdown in females but not in males during exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 282: E634-E642, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Tarnapolsky LJ, MacDougall JD, Atkinson SA, Tarnapolsky MA, and Sutton JR. Gender differences in substrate for endurance exercise. J Appl Physiol 68: 302-308, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Tarnapolsky MA. Gender differences in substrate metabolism during endurance exercise. Can J Appl Physiol 25: 312-327, 2000.[ISI][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Fujita, B. B. Rasmussen, J. A. Bell, J. G. Cadenas, and E. Volpi
Basal muscle intracellular amino acid kinetics in women and men
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2007; 292(1): E77 - E83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. K. Sundaram, O. Muzik, D. C. Chugani, F. Mu, T. J. Mangner, and H. T. Chugani
Quantification of Protein Synthesis in the Human Brain Using L-[1-11C]-Leucine PET: Incorporation of Factors for Large Neutral Amino Acids in Plasma and for Amino Acids Recycled from Tissue
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 1787 - 1795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
J S Volek, C E Forsythe, and W J Kraemer
Nutritional aspects of women strength athletes
Br. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2006; 40(9): 742 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. J. Hamadeh, M. C. Devries, and M. A. Tarnopolsky
Estrogen Supplementation Reduces Whole Body Leucine and Carbohydrate Oxidation and Increases Lipid Oxidation in Men during Endurance Exercise
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3592 - 3599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/3/1259    most recent
01028.2002v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lamont, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kalhan, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lamont, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kalhan, S. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Physiological Society.