Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 95: 854-862, 2003; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00205.2003
8750-7587/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mitzner, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mitzner, W.

HIGHLIGHTED TOPICS
Airway Hyperresponsiveness: From Molecules to Bedside

Invited Review: Understanding airway pathophysiology with computed tomograpy

Robert H. Brown1 and Wayne Mitzner2

Departments of 2Environmental Health Sciences and 1Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Bloomberg School of Public Health and School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 HETEROGENEITY OF AIRWAY...
 MAXIMAL CONTRACTION
 EFFECTS OF DEEP INSPIRATION...
 EFFECTS OF TIDAL STRETCH...
 AIRWAY DISTENSION IN HEALTHY...
 AIRWAY REMODELING AND DISTENSION...
 REFERENCES
 
Conventional pulmonary function tests are limited in the mechanistic insight that they can provide by the fact that they can only provide average measures of lung function. For example, a measurement of decreased expiratory flow assessed with conventional spirometry could result from narrowed large airways, narrowed small airways, closed airways, altered elasticity, or regional heterogeneities in parenchyma or airways. To examine specific mechanisms and pathology in the airways, a method is required that can actually look at specific individual airways. Over the past decade, several more direct methods of assessing specific mechanisms and structural alterations in normal airways and airway pathology in asthma have become available for such purposes. One such method is high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), a method that allows the study of multiple individual airways during either contraction to closure or relaxation in real time, as well as changes in airway size with changes in lung volume. Although other imaging modalities have the potential to image airways in vivo, none presently has the convenience and the accessibility coupled with the resolution required to visualize the parenchymal airways in vivo. Although HRCT may never be widely utilized for routine measurements or screening, because of radiation exposure, cost issues, and a limited ability to follow changes over extended time periods, the method has distinct and unique advantages in quantifying the behavior of airways in vivo. In this mini-review, we focus on these capabilities of HRCT by briefly reviewing highlights of experimental results from several canine and human studies.

high-resolution computed tomography; asthma; airway narrowing; airway closure; deep inspiration


THE PATHOLOGICAL CHANGES IN the airways that contribute to clinical asthma have not been completely elucidated. Measurements of lung function commonly used to understand the pathophysiology associated with asthma are the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), the forced vital capacity, and the ratio of the two. Thus airway pathology in asthma is assessed indirectly by measuring the amount and the speed with which air can be exhaled. On one hand, it may be quite logical and appropriate to assess the degree of the pathology by quantifying how easy or hard it is to get air out of the lung. After all, a decreased ability to exhale is one of the hallmark symptoms of asthma. On the other hand, however, quantifying the degree of obstruction really tells us nothing about the mechanism of the underlying pathology. A decreased flow could result from narrowed large airways, narrowed small airways, closed airways, altered elasticity, or regional heterogeneities in parenchyma or airways. Traditional pulmonary function tests can at best provide only quantitative average measures of lung function. Although several of these global tests of pulmonary function have been used to provide insight into heterogeneity of ventilation, reasons for the local heterogeneities often remain unclear. Even a more specific pulmonary function measurement such as airway resistance will provide neither any insight into where the airway obstruction might be nor any insight into how large the regional heterogeneity in airway size might be. To examine specific mechanisms and pathology in the individual airways, a method is required that can actually look at specific individual airways.

Over the past decade, several direct methods of assessing airway pathology in asthma have been used. One such method is high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) to visualize airway size in vivo. Although other imaging modalities have the potential to image airways in vivo, none presently has the convenience, the accessibility, and the resolution required to visualize the airways. HRCT allows the study of multiple individual airways during contraction to closure and relaxation in real time, as well as allowing study of changes in airway size with changes in lung volume in animals (8, 12, 18, 20) and in human subjects (5, 7, 17, 47, 53). There are no other methods that allow this kind of insight or investigation of airway behavior in vivo. In the following sections, we will document the capabilities of HRCT by briefly reviewing experimental results from several canine and human studies.


    HETEROGENEITY OF AIRWAY RESPONSIVENESS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 HETEROGENEITY OF AIRWAY...
 MAXIMAL CONTRACTION
 EFFECTS OF DEEP INSPIRATION...
 EFFECTS OF TIDAL STRETCH...
 AIRWAY DISTENSION IN HEALTHY...
 AIRWAY REMODELING AND DISTENSION...
 REFERENCES
 
Pulmonary function tests of the whole lung provide an average of what all the airways are doing. In a lung with several thousand conducting airways, it is obvious that there must be some distribution, not only of the level of baseline tone but also of the responsiveness to extrinsic challenges. This is not an easy problem to resolve, even with the ability of HRCT to view individual airways (13).

A key variable in any measure of airway responsiveness is the initial size of the airway. It clearly will take much less shortening of airway smooth muscle to cause a given change in airway resistance when the airway starts from a smaller size. This effect is often neglected in assessment of airway reactivity; however, using HRCT, we have observed substantial variability in the baseline size of individual airways over extended periods of time. Because we establish anatomic landmarks in each dog, it is straightforward to find the same airway on any particular experimental day. We have followed these baseline changes in dogs over the course of ~1 yr (18). These results show a surprising degree of airway variability in the individual airways over this extended time period. Within an animal, an individual airway sometimes seemed to show random variation, whereas on other dates most of the airways appeared to change similarly. We also found no correlation between the magnitude of variability in an individual airway and its location (right vs. left, anterior vs. posterior, and proximal vs. distal) within the lung. Additionally, the mode of challenge was also shown to be unimportant (9). We know of no comparable in vivo studies that examine the changes in individual airway size over time. There are studies in humans and dogs that have shown reproducibility of traditional pulmonary function tests over time (24, 45, 52). However, these measurements reflect a summation of hundreds or thousands of airways. Indeed, if we did a simple average of all the airway areas measured in each dog, we also found no significant changes over time in this mean. Thus mean values or global pulmonary function measurements provide no insight into the extent of individual airway variability. Although we still do not know the reasons for this underlying variability, the only way to study such a potentially important phenomenon is with functional imaging.

The ability of HRCT to pursue this investigation is shown in Fig. 1. Figure 1 shows the variability in baseline size of individual airways in five dogs, studied on two occasions, each separated by at least 2 wk. Airway size is presented as a percentage of each airway's maximally relaxed size, determined at the end of all experiments on each experimental day. This maximal size was shown to be constant over several months. As can be appreciated from Fig. 1, the range of baseline sizes can be quite large, with some airways residing near maximum and others near closure even within the same animal. The variability within an animal is as large as that between animals. Although heterogeneity of ventilation and perfusion have been examined in increasing detail, examination of heterogeneity in the anatomic and physiological functions of individual airways is still in its infancy, but there is substantial evidence suggesting that the pathology in asthmatic lungs is quite heterogeneous (38, 49). How this normal airway variability impacts on individual airway responsiveness and asthma remains to be determined.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Plot of baseline airway area measurements as a percentage of maximally relaxed size in individual airways in 5 dogs on 2 separate occasions (A and B)2–3 wk apart. Symbols for individual airways correspond to the same airway in each dog. There is some consistency over this time period in some dogs (e.g., dog 4 has relatively dilated airways and dog 2 is moderately constricted). Dog 1 shows an extreme variability, with most airways quite constricted (one airway almost closed) on the first day and several airways fully dilated on the next. [From Brown et al. (13), with permission.]

 


    MAXIMAL CONTRACTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 HETEROGENEITY OF AIRWAY...
 MAXIMAL CONTRACTION
 EFFECTS OF DEEP INSPIRATION...
 EFFECTS OF TIDAL STRETCH...
 AIRWAY DISTENSION IN HEALTHY...
 AIRWAY REMODELING AND DISTENSION...
 REFERENCES
 
HRCT can be used to follow the time course of airway contraction to the limits of its resolution (~0.5 mm lumen). We (14) have used this potential to document effective airway closure in response to a spasmogen. This observation of a closure in vivo is consistent with in vitro airway experiments, in which the airways do not generally exhibit a plateau effect to an agonist challenge but continue to constrict to increasing concentrations of agonist until complete closure occurs (1, 25). Although airway closure can also sometimes be observed in vivo (60) and in situ (44) as well as in vitro, these observations are in direct conflict with indirect measurements of airway narrowing in vivo with commonly used pulmonary function tests such as FEV1 or airway resistance. With these conventional global measurements, there appears to be a plateau in the response. We have interpreted these contrary results by concluding that any apparent limitation in airway responses in vivo must be due to mechanisms not directly related to limitations associated with airway smooth muscle contraction. The appearance of a plateau in vivo (26, 43, 50, 59, 63) may result from elastic loads provided by the surrounding lung parenchyma or by limitations in the delivery of agonist to the airway smooth muscle. To investigate this question of maximal narrowing in individual airways in vivo, HRCT was used to visualize canine airways narrowed by two routes of agonist challenge. Airway narrowing induced by methacholine (MCh) via the conventional aerosol route was compared with that caused by local atomization of MCh directly to individual airways. Local atomization of microboluses of agonist were delivered directly to the epithelium of the same airway locations measured during the conventional aerosol challenge. The atomization was accomplished with a specially designed catheter that could be placed with bronchoscopic visualization to deliver agonist to a region smaller than 1 cm in the axial direction (14).

Figures 2 and 3 demonstrate the localized action of histamine on airway constriction. Figure 2 shows a large cartilaginous airway that has closed following local challenge. Figure 3 shows the location of the catheter tip and the degree of constriction as a function of distance along the airway for three sequential increasing doses of histamine. Figure 3 provides several important insights into airway contraction in vivo. First, Fig. 3 clearly supports our ability to generate a very localized constriction with very little axial spreading of the constriction. It was actually quite remarkable to observe airway closure over a range of only a few millimeters, yet, just a few millimeters either side of closure, the airways were nearly 50% of maximal size. There is nothing in the literature that would have led to the prediction that airway closure could occur over so limited a region. This result suggests that there are few axial constraints limiting bronchoconstriction and that severe airway obstruction in asthma might possibly result from relatively few intense local effects.



View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. High-resolution computed tomography images of the same airway from one dog demonstrating airway closure. Left arrow = fully relaxed airway after atropine. Right arrow = absence of the airway lumen after administration of 10 mg/ml of atomized methacholine (MCh). Bar = 10 mm. [From Brown et. al. (14), with permission.]

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. One airway challenged with increasing concentrations of histamine. The airway area is plotted as a function of distance from the catheter (in mm). The airway narrowing was confined to a short distance, a few millimeters on either side of the catheter tip. [From Brown et. al. (14), with permission.]

 

Second, because this airway was ~9 mm in diameter when there was no smooth muscle tone, it clearly documents that there is no limitation on the ability of any intraparenchymal airway to completely close in vivo. This observation is consistent with in vitro experiments and supports the idea that the apparent plateau often seen on aerosol dose-response curves in vivo may be an artifact of the methodology because it clearly does not reflect the ability of airway smooth muscle to completely overcome elastic loads in vivo.

What could be responsible for such artifacts? We do not have a definitive answer, but, as shown in Fig. 4, even in our canine model, such apparent plateaus appear. Although the dose-response curves give the appearance of a plateau, the airway area continued to fall slightly even up to doses of 500 mg/ml. This value of 500 mg/ml was more than an order of magnitude greater than the largest doses normally given to human subjects. It is not possible to challenge with aerosol concentrations much above 500 mg/ml, both because solutions at higher concentrations are not stable at room temperature and begin to precipitate agonist and because systemic drug absorption can lead to cardiovascular instability. However, a 10 mg/ml concentration of MCh delivered locally via the catheter caused complete closure in 13 of 21 airways and extreme narrowing in the remaining 8 airways (Fig. 3). In the airways not initially closed by the 10 mg/ml dose via the catheter, the narrowing was comparable to that seen in the same airways at the 500 mg/ml dose of aerosol MCh. When the 50 mg/ml dose of MCh was delivered via the catheter to the eight airways that remained open after the initial 10 mg/ml dose, they also completely closed. Thus we think that the apparent plateau seen with aerosol challenges may simply reflect a limited ability to deliver higher doses to the airway smooth muscle.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Individual airway areas as a percentage of relaxed area after aerosol (A) and local catheter (B) challenges plotted vs. MCh concentration. Thirteen airways were completely closed after the 10 mg/ml dose of MCh was delivered directly to the airway lumen via the atomization catheter. The remaining 8 airways were closed after the 50 mg/ml dose. [From Brown et. al. (14), with permission.]

 

There has been extensive speculation about the interaction of the parenchyma and the airways. Macklem (39) has suggested that the forces of interdependence of the parenchymal attachments on the airway wall may be the cause of attenuated bronchoconstriction in vivo. This interaction also highlights another difference between whole lung challenge and the local challenge. In the whole lung challenge, the entire parenchyma is contracted as well as the airway, and this could lead to increased tethering forces on the airways. In an attempt to address this issue, we did another study to examine the effects of increased mechanical distending stress on the airways caused by increased positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on preventing airway closure was investigated (10). Although the number of airways that remained open even with maximal stimulation increased significantly when PEEP was increased, airway closure still can occur even at the highest level of PEEP (P = 0.006). At 10 cmH2O, we found that 36% of the airways could still completely close.

These results demonstrate that, whereas lung inflation can limit the ability of airway smooth muscle to shorten, even relatively high levels of PEEP could not always prevent airway closure when there was sufficient stimulation to the airway smooth muscle. Increasing levels of PEEP shift the MCh dose-response curve to the right, indicating an attenuation of airway contraction by the increased lung inflation. The findings also put some constraints on how effective the contracted parenchyma must be if that is to play a role in limiting airway narrowing. The contracted parenchyma must generate an effective peribronchial pressure of greater than 10 cmH2O if it is to be the mechanism that limits closure with aerosol challenge. These results with PEEP also emphasize the heterogeneity in individual airway responses. Whether repeat stimulation with the same degree of lung inflation would close the same population of airways remains to be determined. HRCT is the most accurate method with which to address this question.

Both of these studies indicate that there is no limit to the ability of smooth muscle to shorten in vivo. If these findings can be extrapolated to humans, then several interpretations of these dose-response curves need to be reconsidered. It is often assumed that normal subjects show a maximal dose-response plateau, whereas asthmatic subjects do not (43, 63). However, if there is no limit of normal airways to narrow, then the difference only reflects a shift in the dose-response curve to MCh and not a qualitative difference in the degree of maximal shortening. We believe that if the airways were challenged with the method we used in dogs normal human airways might be capable of constricting to a much greater extent, with many airways even closing completely.


    EFFECTS OF DEEP INSPIRATION ON AIRWAY CONSTRICTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 HETEROGENEITY OF AIRWAY...
 MAXIMAL CONTRACTION
 EFFECTS OF DEEP INSPIRATION...
 EFFECTS OF TIDAL STRETCH...
 AIRWAY DISTENSION IN HEALTHY...
 AIRWAY REMODELING AND DISTENSION...
 REFERENCES
 
Deep inspirations (DIs) to total lung capacity (TLC) have been shown to have both bronchoprotective (prevention of subsequent spasmogen-induced bronchoconstriction) and bronchodilator (post-DI dilation of the airways) effects in healthy subjects (36, 54, 56). However, the effects of a DI appear to be impaired in asthmatic subjects compared with healthy subjects. When considering the effects of a DI, an implicit assumption is that all of the airways are distending to their maximal size at TLC. However, we have previously shown in a canine model that static distension of both relaxed and contracted airways was not directly proportional to the lung inflation (12). Fully relaxed airways were quite distensible at low lung volume but quickly reached a maximal size with no further distension up to TLC. With smooth muscle tone, the airways showed variable degrees of dilation with lung inflation, but maximal distension of moderately constricted airways was generally not achieved even at TLC (12). Because the ability to generate high transpulmonary pressures (Ptp) at TLC depends on both lung properties and voluntary effort, we examined how the response of airways to a DI might be altered if the maneuver was performed at less than maximal inflation. Using HRCT, we examined the effects of varying Ptp during the DI maneuver on subsequent airway caliber in anesthetized and ventilated dogs during MCh infusion, a cholinergic spasmogen, and measured DI-induced changes in airway size over the subsequent 5-min period (11). Our results showed that the magnitude of the Ptp to which the lung was inflated during the DI was extremely important, leading to a qualitative change in the airway response. These results are summarized in Fig. 5, which shows that the magnitude of lung inflation during a DI has a major effect on the subsequent airway size. A large DI causes initial airway distension and then a subsequent recovery back to near baseline size. On the other hand, a small DI also causes initial airway distension but subsequent airway constriction! In the work shown in Fig. 5, distension of MCh-contracted individual airways with tone would be expected to increase with increasing peak inflation pressure but not necessarily achieve maximal dilation even at the largest DI examined (12). These previous observations likely explain the smaller initial airway size at the first time point following the inflation to TLC in Fig. 5. However, the subsequent bronchodilation or bronchoconstriction after the DI could not be predicted from any previous work. With a DI to an airway pressure of 25–35 cmH2O (corresponding to transpulmonary pressures of 17–23 cmH2O), the airways showed a paradoxical constriction after release of the DI.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Percent change in mean airway luminal area immediately after a deep inspiration (DI) to a peak inflation pressure of 25 cmH2O ({square}), 35 cmH2O ({diamond}), and 45 cmH2O ({bullet}). For the larger DI (45 cmH2O), the airway size remained above the baseline airway area for the entire measurement period (*P < 0.0001). In contrast, for the smaller (35 and 25 cmH2O) DIs, the airways actively contracted to a smaller area than at the pre-DI baseline. At 5 min, the airway area was 91 ± 3% of pre-DI airway area for the 35 cmH2O DI (#P < 0.0001) and 73 ± 1% for the 25 cmH2O DI (+ P < 0.0001). [From Brown et. al. (11), with permission.]

 

Mechanisms underlying the observation in this study may have important implications regarding human asthma. It is generally accepted that lung inflation distends the airways of animals and humans (12, 1517). In airways with little smooth muscle tone, even moderate lung inflation readily distends airways to their maximal size, and this was shown to be true in experimental animal models even when airways were made edematous (16, 19). Also, in normal healthy human volunteers and mild asthmatic subjects, there were similar degrees of airway distension at TLC either at baseline or after mildly increased airway tone with aerosol MCh challenges (17).

One mechanistic consideration involves the interaction between recoil pressures of the airway smooth muscle and lung parenchyma following the DI. We know that, at the lower inflation pressures, the airways are less dilated. When the lung recoil pressure is decreased after the DI maneuver, this loss of lung recoil may then lead to a further decrease in airway luminal size. It is not entirely clear, however, why the paradoxical narrowing should take so long to develop. This delay suggests perhaps that some intrinsic properties of the smooth muscle contractile proteins might also be important. In a closely related recent study (6), shortening the time spent at maximal lung volume during a DI maneuver was shown to lead to a subsequent paradoxical contraction of airways. Thus it appears that, to obtain a normal airway dilation after a DI, one must effectively dilate the airways to some minimal size, either by increasing the peak inflation pressure or by lengthening the time at peak pressure. The details of this pressure-time interaction are not yet clear, but as briefly discussed below such a mechanism would seem to have considerable clinical relevance.

Several recent clinical investigations have focused on single or repetitive DIs as a means of preventing or reversing bronchoconstriction (21, 40, 54, 55). In general, the nature of the DIs in the clinical studies were not explicitly specified, but they were usually brief and sigh-like, typically on the order of only a few seconds. The above results may relate to the paradoxical airway narrowing sometimes seen in asthmatic individuals after a DI (3, 17, 21, 27, 28, 31, 48, 58, 62). Perhaps asthmatic airways are stretched too little during the maneuver and behave like the low-pressure groups in the present work.


    EFFECTS OF TIDAL STRETCH ON SUBSEQUENT RESPONSE OF AIRWAYS TO A DI
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 HETEROGENEITY OF AIRWAY...
 MAXIMAL CONTRACTION
 EFFECTS OF DEEP INSPIRATION...
 EFFECTS OF TIDAL STRETCH...
 AIRWAY DISTENSION IN HEALTHY...
 AIRWAY REMODELING AND DISTENSION...
 REFERENCES
 
To explain the absence in asthmatic individuals of a normal dilation following a DI, Skloot et al. (58) postulated first that this resulted from an inability to dilate airways during the lung inflation to TLC and second that this inability is a primary defect in asthma. Their study (58) also showed that, with no DIs during MCh challenge, normal subjects had a greatly exaggerated and sustained response to this agonist. It was suggested that asthmatic airways could be modeled by this situation. Recent experiments by Brusasco et al. (21) and Brown et al. (17), however, suggest that there are more intrinsic differences between the responses to lung inflation in airways from asthmatic and normal subjects. One of these factors may be the influence of the normal tidal stretch on maintaining airway patency.

The effect of rhythmic cycling in decreasing the smooth muscle tone has been shown in both in vitro (33, 37) and in vivo studies (22). Warner and Gunst (61) originally demonstrated that the rhythmic stretching associated with tidal breathing decreased not only the baseline lung resistance but also the response to MCh. Gunst's group later proposed a mechanistic explanation that involves changes in the plasticity of the smooth muscle cellular cytostructure (32, 57). Alternatively, in a series of papers by Fredberg et al. (29, 30), it was proposed that the steady-state muscle force would be determined by a balance between high- and low-energy cross-bridge dynamics and speculated that normal tidal breathing would provide a sufficient stress to keep the low-energy state from occurring in normal lungs.

We tested the validity of these in vitro models in an in vivo canine model using HRCT (42). With the use of a bronchial blocker, the right or left lung could be isolated and selectively ventilated. One lung was then randomized for subsequent ventilation. After 10 min of one-lung ventilation, both lungs were inflated to 30 cmH2O for 10 s; they were then allowed to passively expire to functional residual capacity. This was repeated with the alternate lung ventilated. After the 10-min period of ventilatory stasis in one lung, the subsequent DI led to an increase in airway area in the ventilated lung and a decrease in airway area of the unventilated lung. The correlations in Fig. 6 show that, on the ventilated side, lung volumes increased after a DI, concomitant with an increase in the mean airway. On the nonventilated side, lung volume decreased after a DI, concomitant with a decrease in mean airway area.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Correlation between the changes in airway area and (lung volume)2/3 in the ventilated and nonventilated lungs before and after DI. With respect to pre-DI measurements, on the ventilated side, lung volume increased 65 ± 3% and mean airway area increased to 39 ± 2% after a DI (P = 0.0001). On the nonventilated side, lung volume decreased 48 ± 2% and mean airway area decreased to 34 ± 2% after a DI (P < 0.0001) [From Mitzner and Brown (42), with permission.]

 

These results clearly demonstrate that the airway response to a DI could be qualitatively changed by altering the pattern of normal tidal stresses. By eliminating tidal stresses in one lung, we were able to change the normal airway dilation that would occur in response to a DI to one of airway constriction. This change occurred after tone was induced in the airways with a continuous intravenous infusion of MCh. These observations are striking because they provide a potential mechanism that allows conversion of the normal airway dilation following a DI to that of constriction. All that was needed to cause this qualitative change was to minimize the tidal stresses for a period of time, which led to changes in the smooth muscle that now cause constriction after the DI. Although this qualitative change in the response to DI observed in the dog may well be related to the qualitative difference seen between asthmatic and normal humans, the mechanisms underlying the observation are still not completely clear. For example, the model of Fredberg et al. (29) argued that the stresses associated with normal tidal breathing were sufficient to keep the airway smooth muscle from attaining a low-energy latch state. Whereas our results appear to be consistent to what this model would predict, the situation in the intact living lung is more complex than just the response of smooth muscle in the airway wall. In situ, the final airway size depends on the resultant recoil pressure exerted by the surrounding lung (41). If the DI caused a normal reduction in lung elastic recoil, but has little direct effect on a stiff contracted airway, then the airway would end up smaller. Although changes in asthmatic lungs may not mimic the experimental protocol used, air trapping in the lungs of asthmatic subjects associated with bronchospasm could lead to increased lung volume and altered tidal stresses on the airways and parenchyma. Understanding the dose-time effect of these insidious changes may ultimately affect the way asthma is managed and treated.


    AIRWAY DISTENSION IN HEALTHY AND MILD ASTHMATIC SUBJECTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 HETEROGENEITY OF AIRWAY...
 MAXIMAL CONTRACTION
 EFFECTS OF DEEP INSPIRATION...
 EFFECTS OF TIDAL STRETCH...
 AIRWAY DISTENSION IN HEALTHY...
 AIRWAY REMODELING AND DISTENSION...
 REFERENCES
 
One explanation for the Skloot hypothesis, that a DI may be unable to stretch the airways in asthmatic individuals, is an attenuation of the tethering forces between the small airways and the surrounding parenchyma, i.e., decreased interdependence (36). Our laboratory (17) used HRCT to examine the ability of a DI to distend the airways of mildly asthmatic subjects, compared with healthy subjects, at baseline and after increasing airway tone with nebulized MCh. We found that, both at baseline and after the induction of smooth muscle tone with MCh, a DI distended the airways of healthy and asthmatic subjects to a similar extent, indicating that abnormal interdependence between the lung parenchyma and the airways was unlikely to play a major role in the loss or in the attenuation of the beneficial effect of lung inflation that characterizes asthma. These finding differ from those reported by Colebatch et al. (23), who showed a substantial difference in the distensibility of airways from asthmatic subjects. Reasons for this difference are unclear but may be related to tissue dynamic properties in their measurements of lung conductance or the severity of their asthmatic population. In our study (17), we also observed that, after constriction had already been induced by MCh, a DI caused subsequent bronchodilation in the healthy subjects but further bronchoconstriction in the asthmatic subjects (Fig. 7). These findings suggest that abnormal intrinsic properties of the airway smooth muscle of mildly asthmatic subjects may counteract the bronchodilatory effect of a DI.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Average airway areas in 4 normal (open bars) and in 5 asthmatic (solid bars) subjects at baseline functional residual capacity (FRC; 100%) after bronchoconstriction with aerosol MCh, at total lung capacity (TLC; DI maneuver) following the MCh challenge, and again, at FRC, after the TLC maneuver. There was a significant increase in airway luminal area after the DI in the healthy subjects compared with FRC after MCh (*P = 0.03). In contrast, there was a significant decrease in airway luminal area after the DI in the asthmatic subjects compared with FRC after MCh (**P < 0.0001). [Figure adapted from data in Brown et al. (17).]

 


    AIRWAY REMODELING AND DISTENSION IN SEVERE ASTHMA
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 HETEROGENEITY OF AIRWAY...
 MAXIMAL CONTRACTION
 EFFECTS OF DEEP INSPIRATION...
 EFFECTS OF TIDAL STRETCH...
 AIRWAY DISTENSION IN HEALTHY...
 AIRWAY REMODELING AND DISTENSION...
 REFERENCES
 
The mildly asthmatic subjects studied in the above protocol had normal baseline pulmonary function. In the production of the symptoms of an acute asthmatic attack, however, there is general acceptance that the degree of severity in chronic asthma should be a function of airway caliber. Therefore, the decrease in the baseline FEV1 with increasing severity should be accompanied by decreasing luminal area. However, such a relationship has not been demonstrated in most studies in which the relationship between FEV1 and luminal area was examined, (2, 4, 34, 38, 46), and at least one group has expressed surprise that such a relationship has not been found (46). We feel that one explanation for this absent correlation is the confounding role of changes in lung volumes on airway dimensions, a factor not generally taken into account. With increasing severity, lung volume and elastic recoil pressure often change in asthmatic patients, and the airway luminal area becomes larger as lung volume increases. Because changes in TLC are not correlated with increasing severity (35), HRCT measurements of airway size at TLC may give insight into disease severity.

In ongoing work, we have attempted to address these issues in more severely asthmatic subjects, in which there may be chronic changes altering both the structure and distensibility of airways. Such changes should result in both decreased baseline function and an inability to fully distend the airways at TLC. We measured the ability of asthmatic subjects with varying degrees of baseline airway obstruction to distend their airways with a DI. This preliminary work shows that there is a significant decrease in airway distensibility in the severely obstructed subjects compared with those with either mild or moderate baseline obstruction (unpublished observations). Thus asthmatic individuals with greater airflow obstruction do have a decreased ability to distend their airways with lung inflation to TLC. Such compromised airway distensibility could result from increased stiffness of the airways from increased airway smooth muscle tone or secondary to airway remodeling and deposition of nondistensible elements such as collagen in the airway wall (51). Furthermore, although the previous study suggested that decreased parenchymal interdependence may not be important in mild asthma, it may assume increasing importance in the severe condition.

This new work in humans has also found that there are structural changes in airways that are consistent with decreased lung function even with no smooth muscle tone (unpublished observations). These results show that decreased FEV1 is correlated with smaller postalbuterol airway luminal area at TLC. One reason that we can reveal this expected relationship between luminal area and FEV1 is the ability of HRCT to measure the airway areas at TLC. Further precision can also be achieved because the dimensions at TLC used for the relationship to FEV1 were obtained after maximal relaxation with albuterol, thereby minimizing the size variability associated with different levels of baseline tone. This observation supports a potentially key role of airway remodeling on asthma severity and further supports this imaging methodology as a productive approach to examining the role of remodeling on airway obstruction and asthma severity.

In summary, we have shown the unique ability of HRCT to quantify static and dynamic changes in individual airways as small as 1 mm in diameter. Although several new insights into airway behavior in vivo have been obtained with this method, there are some clear limitations with its widespread use. Some of these include the amount of radiation given to subjects, the cost, the required supine position, and the inability to see the small membranous airways. The most promising approach for future mechanistic studies may result from combining HRCT with measurements of lung mechanics and classical pulmonary function tests.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for correspondence: W. Mitzner, Division of Physiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins Univ., 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205 (E-mail: wmitzner{at}jhsph.edu).


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 HETEROGENEITY OF AIRWAY...
 MAXIMAL CONTRACTION
 EFFECTS OF DEEP INSPIRATION...
 EFFECTS OF TIDAL STRETCH...
 AIRWAY DISTENSION IN HEALTHY...
 AIRWAY REMODELING AND DISTENSION...
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Armour CL, Black JL, Berend N, and Woolcock AJ. The relationship between bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine and airway smooth muscle structure and reactivity. Respir Physiol 58: 223-233, 1984.
  2. Awadh N, Muller NL, Park CS, Abboud RT, and FitzGerald JM. Airway wall thickness in patients with near fatal asthma and control groups: assessment with high resolution computed tomographic scanning. Thorax 53: 248-253, 1998.
  3. Beaupre A and Orehek J. Factors influencing the bronchodilator effect of a deep inspiration in asthmatic patients with provoked bronchoconstriction. Thorax 37: 124-128, 1982.
  4. Beigelman-Aubry C, Capderou A, Grenier PA, Straus C, Becquemin MH, Similowski T, and Zelter M. Mild intermittent asthma: CT assessment of bronchial cross-sectional area and lung attenuation at controlled lung volume. Radiology 223: 181-187, 2002.
  5. Boulet L, Belanger M, and Carrier G. Airway responsiveness and bronchial-wall thickness in asthma with or without fixed airflow obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152: 865-871, 1995.
  6. Brown RH. Duration of deep inspiration and subsequent airway constriction in vivo. J Asthma 40: 119-124, 2003.
  7. Brown RH, Croisille P, Mudge B, Diemer FB, Permutt S, and Togias A. Airway narrowing in healthy humans inhaling methacholine without deep inspirations demonstrated by HRCT. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161: 1256-1263, 2000.
  8. Brown RH, Herold CJ, Hirshman CA, Zerhouni EA, and Mitzner W. In vivo measurements of airway reactivity using high resolution computed tomography. Am Rev Respir Dis 144: 208-212, 1991.
  9. Brown RH, Herold CJ, Hirshman CA, Zerhouni EA, and Mitzner W. Individual airway constrictor response heterogeneity assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. J Appl Physiol 74: 2615-2620, 1993.
  10. Brown RH and Mitzner W. Airway closure with high PEEP in vivo. J Appl Physiol 89: 956-960, 2000.
  11. Brown RH and Mitzner W. Airway response to deep inspiration: role of inflation pressure. J Appl Physiol 91: 2574-2578, 2001.
  12. Brown RH and Mitzner W. Effect of lung inflation and airway muscle tone on airway diameter in vivo. J Appl Physiol 80: 1581-1588, 1996.
  13. Brown RH and Mitzner W. Heterogeneity in airways. In: Complexity in Structure and Function of the Lung, edited by Hlastala MP and Robertson HT. New York: Dekker, 1998, p. 1-34.
  14. Brown RH and Mitzner W. The myth of maximal airway responsiveness in vivo. J Appl Physiol 85: 2012-2017, 1998.
  15. Brown RH, Mitzner W, Bulut Y, and Wagner EM. Effects of lung inflation in vivo on airways with smooth muscle tone or edema. J Appl Physiol 82: 491-499, 1997.
  16. Brown RH, Mitzner W, and Wagner EM. Interaction between airway edema and lung inflation on responsiveness of individual airways in vivo. J Appl Physiol 83: 366-370, 1997.
  17. Brown RH, Scichilone N, Mudge B, Diemer FB, Permutt S, and Togias A. High-resolution computed tomographic evaluation of airway distensibility and the effects of lung inflation on airway caliber in healthy subjects and individuals with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163: 994-1001, 2001.
  18. Brown RH, Zerhouni AE, and Mitzner W. Variability in the size of individual airways over the course of one year. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151: 1159-1164, 1995.
  19. Brown RH, Zerhouni EA, and Mitzner W. Airway edema potentiates airway reactivity. J Appl Physiol 79: 1242-1248, 1995.
  20. Brown RH, Zerhouni EA, and Mitzner W. Visualization of airway obstruction in vivo during lung vascular engorgement and edema. J Appl Physiol 78: 1070-1078, 1995.
  21. Brusasco V, Crimi E, Barisione G, Spanevello A, Rodarte JR, and Pellegrino R. Airway responsiveness to methacholine: effects of deep inhalations and airway inflammation. J Appl Physiol 87: 567-573, 1999.
  22. Bulut Y, Hirshman CA, and Brown RH. Prevention of lidocaine aerosol-induced bronchoconstriction with intravenous lidocaine. Anesthesiology 85: 853-859, 1996.
  23. Colebatch HJ, Finucane KE, and Smith MM. Pulmonary conductance and elastic recoil relationships in asthma and emphysema. J Appl Physiol 34: 143-153, 1973.
  24. Dawson A. Reproducibility of spirometric measurements in normal subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 93: 264-269, 1966.
  25. De Jongste JC, Sterk PJ, Willems LN, Mons H, Timmers MC, and Kerrebijn KF. Comparison of maximal bronchoconstriction in vivo and airway smooth muscle responses in vitro in nonasthmatic humans. Am Rev Respir Dis 138: 321-326, 1988.
  26. Ding DJ, Martin JG, and Macklem PT. Effects of lung volume on maximal methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in normal humans. J Appl Physiol 62: 1324-1330, 1987.
  27. Fish JE, Ankin MG, Kelly JF, and Peterman VI. Regulation of bronchomotor tone by lung inflation in asthmatic and nonasthmatic subjects. J Appl Physiol 50: 1079-1086, 1981.
  28. Fish JE, Peterman VI, and Cugell D. Effect of deep inspiration on airway conductance in subjects with allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 60: 41-46, 1977.
  29. Fredberg JJ, Inouye D, Miller B, Nathan M, Jafari S, Raboudi S, Butler JP, and Shore SA. Airway smooth muscle, tidal stretches and dynamically-determined contractile states. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156: 1752-1759, 1997.
  30. Fredberg JJ, Jones KA, Raboudi NS, Prakash YS, Shore SA, Butler JP, and Sieck GC. Friction in airway smooth muscle: mechanism, latch, and implications in asthma. J Appl Physiol 81: 2703-2712, 1996.
  31. Gayrard P, Orehek J, Grimaud C, and Charpin J. Bronchoconstrictor effects of a deep inspiration in patients with asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 111: 433-439, 1975.
  32. Gunst SJ, Meiss RA, Wu MF, and Rowe M. Mechanisms for the mechanical plasticity of tracheal smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 268: C1267-C1276, 1995.
  33. Gunst SJ and Mitzner W. Mechanical properties of contracted canine bronchial segments in vitro. J Appl Physiol 50: 1236-1247, 1981.
  34. Harmanci E, Kebapci M, Metintas M, and Ozkan R. High-resolution computed tomography findings are correlated with disease severity in asthma. Respiration 69: 420-426, 2002.
  35. Irvin CG. Airway mechanics in asthma. In: Rhinitis and Asthma, edited by Holgate ST. Boston, MA: Blackwell Scientific, 1995, p. 1033-1043.
  36. Kapsali T, Permutt S, Laube B, Scichilone N, and Togias A. Potent bronchoprotective effect of deep inspiration and its absence in asthma. J Appl Physiol 89: 711-720, 2000.
  37. Kharitonov SA and Barnes PJ. Exhaled markers of pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163: 1693-1722, 2001.
  38. Lutchen KR, Jensen A, Atileh H, Kaczka DW, Israel E, Suki B, and Ingenito EP. Airway constriction pattern is a central component of asthma severity: the role of deep inspirations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164: 207-215, 2001.
  39. Macklem PT. Mechanical factors determining maximum bronchoconstriction. Eur Respir J 2, Suppl 6: 516s-519s, 1989.
  40. Malmberg P, Larsson K, Sundblad BM, and Zhiping W. Importance of the time interval between FEV1 measurements in a methacholine provocation test. Eur Respir J 6: 680-686, 1993.
  41. Mead J, Takishima T, and Leith D. Stress distribution in lungs: a model of pulmonary elasticity. J Appl Physiol 28: 596-608, 1970.
  42. Mitzner W and Brown RH. Potential mechanism of hyperresponsive airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161: 1619-1623, 2000.
  43. Moore BJ, Hilliam CC, Verburgt LM, Wiggs BR, Vedal S, and Pare PD. Shape and position of the complete dose-response curve for inhaled methacholine in normal subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154: 642-648, 1996.
  44. Murtagh PS, Proctor DF, Permutt S, Kelly B, and Evering S. Bronchial closure with Mecholyl in excised dog lobes. J Appl Physiol 31: 409-415, 1971.
  45. Nickerson BG, Lemen RJ, Gerdes CB, Wegmann MJ, and Robertson G. Within-subject variability and per cent change for significance of spirometry in normal subjects and in patients with cystic fibrosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 122: 859-866, 1980.
  46. Niimi A, Matsumoto H, Amitani R, Nakano Y, Mishima M, Minakuchi M, Nishimura K, Itoh H, and Izumi T. Airway wall thickness in asthma assessed by computed tomography. Relation to clinical indices. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162: 1518-1523, 2000.
  47. Okazawa M, Muller N, McNamara AE, Child S, Verburgt L, and Pare PD. Human airway narrowing measured using high resolution computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154: 1557-1562, 1996.
  48. Orehek J, Charpin D, Velardocchio JM, and Grimaud C. Bronchomotor effect of bronchoconstriction-induced deep inspirations in asthmatics. Am Rev Respir Dis 121: 297-305, 1980.
  49. Quan SF, Moon MA, and Lemen RJ. Effects of arachidonic acid, PGF2{alpha}, and a PGH2 analogue on airway diameters in dogs. J Appl Physiol 53: 1005-1014, 1982.
  50. Robatto FM, Simard S, Orana H, Macklem PT, and Ludwig MS. Effect of lung volume on plateau response of airways and tissue to methacholine in dogs. J Appl Physiol 73: 1908-1913, 1992.
  51. Roche WR, Beasley R, Williams JH, and Holgate ST. Subepithelial fibrosis in the bronchi of asthmatics. Lancet 1: 520-524, 1989.
  52. Rozas CJ and Goldman AL. Daily spirometric variability: normal subjects and subjects with chronic bronchitis with and without airflow obstruction. Arch Intern Med 142: 1287-1291, 1982.
  53. Sasaki F, Saitoh Y, Verburgt L, and Okazawa M. Airway wall dimensions during carbachol-induced bronchoconstriction in rabbits. J Appl Physiol 81: 1578-1583, 1996.
  54. Scichilone N, Kapsali T, Permutt S, and Togias A. Deep inspiration-induced bronchoprotection is stronger than bronchodilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162: 910-916, 2000.
  55. Scichilone N, Permutt S, and Togias A. The lack of the bronchoprotective and not the bronchodilatory ability of deep inspiration is associated with airway hyperresponsiveness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163: 413-419, 2001.
  56. Scichilone N, Pyrgos G, Kapsali T, Anderlind C, Brown R, Permutt S, and Togias A. Airways hyperresponsiveness and the effects of lung inflation. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 124: 262-266, 2001.
  57. Shen X, Wu MF, Tepper RS, and Gunst SJ. Mechanisms for the mechanical response of airway smooth muscle to length oscillation. J Appl Physiol 83: 731-738, 1997.
  58. Skloot G, Permutt S, and Togias AG. Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: a problem of limited smooth muscle relaxation with inspiration. J Clin Invest 96: 2393-2403, 1995.
  59. Sterk PJ, Timmers MC, and Dijkman JH. Maximal airway narrowing in humans in vivo histamine compared with methacholine. Am Rev Respir Dis 134: 714-718, 1986.
  60. Tepper RS, Gunst SJ, Doerschuk CM, Shen X, and Bray W. Effect of transpulmonary pressure on airway closure in immature and mature rabbits. J Appl Physiol 78: 505-512, 1995.
  61. Warner DO and Gunst SJ. Limitation of maximal bronchoconstriction in living dogs. Am Rev Respir Dis 145: 553-560, 1992.
  62. Wheatley JR, Pare PD, and Engel LA. Reversibility of induced bronchoconstriction by deep inspiration in asthmatic and normal subjects. Eur Respir J 2: 331-339, 1989.
  63. Woolcock AJ, Salome CM, and Yan K. The shape of the dose-response curve to histamine in asthmatic and normal subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 130: 71-75, 1984.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. J. Lai-Fook, P. K. Houtz, and Y.-L. Lai
End-expiratory and tidal volumes measured in conscious mice using single projection x-ray images
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2008; 104(2): 521 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. H. Brown, D. B. Pearse, G. Pyrgos, M. C. Liu, A. Togias, and S. Permutt
The structural basis of airways hyperresponsiveness in asthma
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2006; 101(1): 30 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
G. Musch and J. G. Venegas
Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Regional Pulmonary Perfusion and Ventilation
Proceedings of the ATS, December 1, 2005; 2(6): 522 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. T. Tgavalekos, M. Tawhai, R. S. Harris, G. Mush, M. Vidal-Melo, J. G. Venegas, and K. R. Lutchen
Identifying airways responsible for heterogeneous ventilation and mechanical dysfunction in asthma: an image functional modeling approach
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2388 - 2397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
L. Deng, N. J. Fairbank, B. Fabry, P. G. Smith, and G. N. Maksym
Localized mechanical stress induces time-dependent actin cytoskeletal remodeling and stiffening in cultured airway smooth muscle cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): C440 - C448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. K. Kjaergaard, O. F. Pedersen, M. R. Miller, T. R. Rasmussen, J. C. Hansen, and L. Molhave
Ozone exposure decreases the effect of a deep inhalation on forced expiratory flow in normal subjects
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2004; 96(5): 1651 - 1657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mitzner, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mitzner, W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Physiological Society.