|
|
||||||||
HIGHLIGHTED TOPICS
Airway Hyperresponsiveness: From Molecules to Bedside
1Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Chicago, and 3Children's Memorial Hospital and 4Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60637; and 2Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
actin; myosin; airflow obstruction
| WHAT MEDIATORS ARE INVOLVED IN ASTHMA INFLAMMATION? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TNF-
)]; chemokines [eotaxin, eosinophil
cationic protein, macrophage inflammatory protein-1
, monocyte
chemotactic proteins (MCP-1 MCP-3, MCP-5), regulated-upon-activation normal T
cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), macrophage-derived chemokine, and thymus
and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC)]; growth factors [transforming
growth factor-
(TGF-
), connective tissue growth factor, basic
fibroblast growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), nerve growth
factor, and insulin-like growth factors I and II (IGF-I and IGF-II)];
neurotransmitters (NK-A, NK-B, and substance P); platelet-activating factor;
leukotrienes; histamine; endothelin 1 (ET-1); matrix metalloproteinases
(MMP-2, MMP-8, MMP-9); and nitric oxide (NO) (the roles of these mediators are
reviewed in Refs. 13,
23,
32,
36,
70,
73,
87). This is by no means an
exhaustive list. Interaction among these different cytokines and growth
factors in airway inflammation forms a complex network because 1)
inflammatory mediators (particularly cytokines) have pleiotropic effects,
2) there exist antagonistic and synergistic relationships between
different inflammatory mediators, and 3) inflammatory mediators
exhibit high levels of redundancy of function
(87). | SMOOTH MUSCLE CONTRACTILE APPARATUS DYSFUNCTION IN ASTHMA |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The concept that the "dynamic" component of smooth muscle contraction might be altered in asthma was first proposed by Stephens and colleagues (6). This proposal was confirmed in humans in 1981, when Fish and colleagues (24) demonstrated that a deep inspiration (DI) to total lung capacity produced substantial (and sustained) bronchodilatation after constriction had been acutely induced in nonasthmatic subjects. Importantly, in asthmatic subjects, this bronchodilatory effect was substantially reduced, and, in some asthmatic subjects, DI can even exacerbate bronchoconstriction (50). The importance of DI was further highlighted by the fact that a prolonged period in which DI is voluntarily prohibited significantly enhances airway responsiveness to methacholine in nonasthmatic subjects (62, 78). These studies together suggest that DI is a key physiological way of diminishing the effects of bronchoconstrictor stimuli and that prevention of DI alone can make healthy airways hyperresponsive in a manner similar to that of asthmatic subjects.
Why is the response to DI altered in asthma? One possible explanation is that the airways are stiffer and cannot easily be expanded in response to the increased pull on the airway by the expanding lung parenchyma during DI. Examination of airway dead space volume showed that asthmatic subjects do have reduced distensibility on inspiration (79, 97), suggesting that increased stiffness is evident in bronchodilator-treated asthmatic airways. In addition, Jensen and colleagues (39) concluded that contracted asthmatic ASM is stiffer than contracted healthy ASM because in their study asthmatic airways did not fully distend on DI. However, Brown and colleagues (10) demonstrated that stiffness may not fully explain the response to DI in asthmatic subjects because they measured similar increases in airway diameter on DI in methacholine-contracted asthmatic and healthy airways with high-resolution computed tomography scans. What was clear in the Brown and Jensen studies, however, was that the airways quickly narrowed again after return to normal tidal breathing in the asthmatic patients, in contrast to the normal airways that remained relatively dilated following DI (10, 39).
How might the augmented post-DI contraction seen in asthma influence airway reactivity? As Solway and Fredberg (83) postulated previously, if reshortening after airway muscle stretching happened slowly, then the bronchodilatory effect of the DI would persist, as it does in healthy airways. This would reduce the net effect of the constrictor agonist used to induce airway narrowing (Fig. 1). If in asthma the airways recontract far more rapidly after DI than in healthy airways, then at the end of expiration the airways would be substantially narrower. In this case, the bronchodilatory effect of the DI would then become transient, indeed perhaps unnoticeable.
|
The mechanisms leading to the increased reshortening following DI in asthma are not currently known. Is it simply because asthmatic ASM shortens faster after DI? Alternatively, is it due to a dysfunction in the ability of DI to fully disturb the ability of the contractile apparatus to generate force? Or are both mechanisms involved? These hypotheses will be discussed below (presented in summary form in Fig. 2). An additional possibility is that asthmatic airway remodeling alone might explain the increased reshortening following DI: mathematical modeling studies have demonstrated that, for a given degree of ASM shortening, the resistance increase would be far higher in a remodeled airway than in a normal healthy airway (38). Thus, after DI, the asthmatic ASM might reshorten at the same speed as healthy ASM, but the resulting airway narrowing would be exaggerated because of amplification of the smooth muscle contraction caused by the increased airway thickness. Furthermore, at a given level of contractile stimulation, the increased mass of ASM might generate more total force, thereby promoting excessive airway narrowing. The precise contribution to AHR of each of these potential mechanisms remains unknown. However, recent evidence suggests that alterations to the smooth muscle cells per se are likely to contribute to the post-DI contraction response (see below).
|
Smooth muscle shortening velocity. Myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) phosphorylation of the regulatory myosin light chain (MLC20) is an essential step during activation of the actin and myosin cross-bridge cycling that shortens the myocyte (80, 91). The phosphorylation state of MLC20 is known to regulate the speed of cross-bridge cycling on addition of a contractile stimulus; thus the level of phosphorylation determines to some extent the velocity of muscle contraction (16). The possibility that velocity of shortening (and consequently the total extent of shortening during contraction of a fixed period) might be abnormally increased in asthma was first championed by Newman Stephens, based on studies in an allergen-sensitized dog model (6, 40, 41). Ma and colleagues (52) have since demonstrated that the velocity of shortening of isolated asthmatic ASM is increased relative to ASM from healthy subjects and identified that MLCK levels and activity are increased in the asthmatic muscle, providing a regulatory protein-mediated explanation for increased shortening velocity. Factors that might influence the level of myosin phosphorylation in asthma are considered later.
Smooth muscle mechanical plasticity. The term "plasticity"has been applied to smooth muscle behavior in at least three different contexts. First, smooth muscle cells appear to be able to acquire different biochemical and functional phenotypes in culture (reviewed in Ref. 30) and in tissue pathology (64). Because contractile filament content and cytoskeletal organization vary among phenotypically diverse myocytes, their mechanical function could also be expected to vary widely. Such "phenotypic plasticity" could conceivably be manifest in asthma, although this has not been established to date.
Second, smooth muscle strips can generate force when activated over a very wide range of precontraction lengths; that is, the active-force vs. passive-precontraction-length relationship of smooth muscle is very flat. Pratusevich and colleagues (67) identified this mechanical property of normal smooth muscle as plasticity of the contractile apparatus and proposed that addition or removal of contractile units in series, possibly by formation or dissolution of myosin filaments (so-called "myosin evanescence"), could explain this adaptation of the contractile apparatus to length change. Seow and colleagues provided evidence for myosin evanescence, by demonstrating myosin filament lability in relaxed muscle, partial dissolution of thick filaments by during oscillatory strain of relaxed muscle (45), and increased thick filament density in activated muscle (33) that might stem from regulatory MLC phosphorylation (69). Along with the observation that shortening velocity changes (without change in isometric force) when smooth muscle is adapted to different lengths (75), these results suggested that a series-to-parallel rearrangement of contractile units could occur during contraction. Gunst and colleagues (27, 28, 55) have highlighted the potential complementary role of rearrangement of connections between focal adhesion complexes and cytoskeletal elements (especially actin filaments) in contributing to this behavior.
A third type of mechanical plasticity has also been identified in normal smooth muscle during contraction, that is, plastic deformation. To illustrate this behavior, consider the difference between stretching and releasing a rubber band vs. stretching and releasing a taffy candy bar. When stretched and released, the rubber band retains a restoring force that promotes reshortening. During stretch, the rubber band has undergone "elastic" deformation. In contrast, when stretched and released, the taffy may reshorten a little, but most of its restoring force has been lost, and it remains stretched beyond its original length. The taffy has undergone "plastic" deformation. It is now well established that healthy ASM exhibits taffylike behavior while contracted; that is, after stretch and release, it loses much of the original force of contraction present before the externally imposed length deformation (25, 26, 56). Clearly, if ASM deformed plastically during the stretch imposed by a DI in normal individuals but elastically during a DI in asthmatic individuals, then loss of plastic deformation in asthmatic individuals could account for their lack of net bronchodilation induced by DI (Fig. 1).
What is the molecular basis of plastic deformation of contracted airway muscle? Fredberg and colleagues (26) demonstrated that imposition of gradually increasing sinusoidal load fluctuations (similar to tidal breathing) on bovine trachealis strips resulted in smooth muscle lengthening. In a proposed mechanism termed "perturbed equilibrium of myosin binding," they suggested that ASM length is not governed by the isometric force-generating capacity of the muscle but by a dynamically equilibrated steady state. This perturbed state is characterized by reduced actomyosin bridges and a faster rate of cross-bridge turnover. Load fluctuations act to perturb the binding of myosin and actin, resulting in reduced muscle stiffness and muscle lengthening. They also found that reducing the force fluctuations back down to a lower amplitude resulted in muscle reshortening, although not all the way back to the original length. This suggested that the load fluctuations resulted in a plastic deformation in the muscle. Furthermore, they concluded that perturbation of myosin binding equilibrium is a self-reinforcing mechanism that limits contraction: the more the muscle stretches (and becomes less stiff), the easier it becomes to stretch with an externally applied force. Such a response might explain the observation that asthmatic airways do not fully distend after DI (39). Conversely, if a contracted muscle strip is allowed to shorten without ever being stretched, then this self-reinforcing mechanism would be lost and the muscle would remain "so stiff that it would be virtually frozen at its static equilibrium length" (26). Presently, it remains unknown whether the factors that determine myosin binding equilibrium differ between normal and asthmatic muscle. However, a recent study by Naghshin and coworkers (63) suggests that chronic adaptation of smooth muscle to passive short lengths renders the muscle bundle refractory to stretch-induced relaxation and increases its force generation capacity at shorter length. It is tempting to speculate that this effect of chronic passive shortening might even interact with the enhanced stiffness of "frozen" contracted unstretched muscle; together, these mechanisms might explain the increased stiffness of chronically contracted asthmatic airways to DI, such as observed by Jensen and colleagues (39).
A second potential molecular mechanism for stretch-induced plastic lengthening of contracted smooth muscle is suggested by the observation of Kuo et al. (45) that mechanical strain decreases the ability of the muscle to generate force (and shortening) due to partial dissolution of myosin thick filaments. Presently, it remains unknown whether this phenomenon is deranged in asthma.
We have postulated (18) an alternative basis for plastic vs. elastic deformation of contracted smooth muscle during stretch. We speculate that actin filaments might differ in length between normal and asthmatic smooth muscle, with longer actin filaments in asthmatic ASM than in normal ASM. This difference might exist before contraction, in resting muscle, or might arise after contractile activation, as actin polymerization is stimulated by contractile activation (55). As illustrated in Fig. 3, the contractile units of a myocyte with shorter actin filaments might necessarily undergo a parallel-to-series rearrangement during stretch if reshortening is to occur after release. Such rearrangement reduces the number of force-generating units in parallel and results in plastic deformation-like behavior; i.e., stretch and release reduce generated force. In contrast, contractile units containing longer actin filaments need not undergo parallel-to-series rearrangement during stretch and thus might not lose force on release. Thus myocytes with longer actin filaments could be expected to exhibit more elastic deformation during stretch. Perhaps the greater elasticity would even limit the lengthening of muscle during stretch, as has been suggested by Jensen et al. (39). At present, it is unknown whether this potential mechanism operates in smooth muscle at all or whether differences in actin filament length account for a potential difference in plastic vs. elastic deformation in normal or asthmatic ASM, respectively. Below, we consider factors that might promote actin filament elongation in airway inflammation.
|
| DO INFLAMMATORY MEDIATORS DIRECTLY INCREASE NONSPECIFIC AIRWAY RESPONSIVENESS? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
increases responsiveness to muscarinic agonists, bradykinin, and thrombin
(3,
5,
71,
88). Conversely, the response
to IL-1
is more variable, in that IL-1
has agonist-specific
influence on airway responsiveness of human isolated bronchi
(8,
68,
88). There are a number of
studies in human airway cell culture and in isolated airways of other species
demonstrating that cytokines (including other Th2 cytokines and inflammatory
factors) directly contribute to AHR
(77). Thus it appears that
1) acute exposure of cytokines can itself induce AHR and 2)
more than one mediator is implicated in this effect. However, as discussed
above, isometric force generation to contractile agonists is thought to be
similar in asthmatic and healthy airways (or sensitized animals vs. sham
animals), suggesting that some caution must be applied to these results from
studies incorporating experimental cytokine exposure ex vivo. Perhaps exposing
normal ASM to "asthma-like environment" (IgE, atopic serum,
TNF-
, IL-1
, and so forth) does not actually reproduce the
environment of the disease, or maybe once asthmatic ASM is removed from its
natural environment it reverts to normal (as regards isometric force
generation).
How do these inflammatory mediators act to increase airway
responsiveness? It is known that TNF-
increases human ASM
responsiveness in vitro through enhancing contractile agonist-stimulated
increases in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and augmentation of peak and
sustained intracellular calcium levels, all of which are key components
leading to smooth muscle contraction
(3,
5,
71,
88). TNF-
-enhanced
force generation takes at least 6 h to appear and could be inhibited by
cycloheximide, suggesting that new protein synthesis is required
(4).
Besides influencing force generation, passive sensitization of human
tracheal smooth muscle with IgE-rich atopic serum, or treatment with
individual cytokines such as IL-1
and TNF-
, can blunt ASM
relaxation normally induced by
2-adrenoceptor stimulation
(29,
48,
84). This effect is mediated
through
2-adrenoceptor phosphorylation
(31), Gs protein
dysfunction (85), and
increased prostanoid (48) and
peptidoleukotriene (84)
release.
Even less is known of the influence of inflammatory mediators on the dynamic component of smooth muscle contraction, but recent evidence suggests that they may play a significant role.
How might inflammatory mediators influence increased MLCK and shortening velocity? The studies of Stephens and others provide some guide as to how inflammatory mediators might result in increased MLCK activity. Studies in dog (61), guinea pig (59), mouse (22), and human (1) airways show that sensitization of the airways is sufficient to result in increased levels of MLCK or increased shortening velocity. Thus an increase in the activity and/or content of smooth muscle MLCK may be one of the initial events to contribute to the pathogenesis of AHR and may be sustained in the absence of further acute challenge. It should be noted that genetic predisposition might influence the susceptibility to this response. A study comparing two mouse strains, SJL and ASW, demonstrated differences in regulation of shortening velocity on sensitization with ovalbumin (22). The SJL strain exhibited greater splenocyte IL-4 production after specific antigen challenge and greater smooth muscle shortening velocity after sensitization. The ASW strain had diminished IL-4 response to antigen challenge and no increase in maximal ASM shortening velocity. These findings also imply that the change in ASM shortening velocity was dependent on the generation of a substantial immune-based inflammatory response in this model.
What is the time course of change in shortening velocity? Exposure to the serum alone of atopic subjects for as little as 16 h is sufficient to increase the shortening velocity of human ASM (61), indicating that IgE, cytokines, or other inflammatory mediators in the atopic serum might act directly on the smooth muscle to mediate changes in actomyosin dynamics.
Which intracellular signaling pathways are involved? Of the
signaling pathways that influence MLC20 phosphorylation (and thus shortening
velocity), Rho kinase and increased intracellular calcium appear to be the
most important (reviewed in Ref.
81). MLCK activity increases
with intracellular free calcium by a calmodulin-dependent mechanism, and it is
this pathway by which most agonists stimulate smooth muscle contraction. There
was no difference in calmodulin level or activity in the ragweed-sensitized
dog model, which showed increased shortening velocity
(42), implying that the
increase in MLCK levels and activity might be directly due to increased
expression. However, a number of cytokines and growth factors such as
IL-1
, TNF-
, and thrombin
(2,
65,
71) all activate intracellular
calcium in ASM and thus may further potentiate activation of this pathway to
contractile agonists in the inflamed airway.
Rho kinase acts to inhibit MLC phosphatase activity, thus promoting the
phosphorylated state of MLC20
(43). Rho kinase has also been
implicated in the direct phosphorylation of MLC20 in a calcium-independent
manner (93). Van Eyk and
colleagues showed, in permeabilized cultured canine tracheal myocytes, that a
constitutively active form of Rho kinase appeared to phosphorylate the
regulatory MLC directly (93).
Of particular interest is that RhoA, the GTPase that activates Rho kinase, is
increased in ASM of hyperresponsive rats
(14). RhoA activity is
stimulated by a multitude of mediators such as lysophosphatidic acid
TNF-
, TGF-
, IL-1
, and many growth factors
(51,
53,
54). However, in contrast to
Van Eyk's results, subsequent studies by Deng et al.
(15) demonstrated that
integrin-linked kinase was responsible for non-MLCK-mediated MLC20
phosphorylation in smooth muscle. It is not currently known whether changes in
integrin activity or extracellular matrix composition can increase MLC20
phosphorylation through this pathway. Thus, in addition to increased MLCK
activity, it seems entirely likely that other pathways interact to effect
increased MLC20 phosphorylation in the inflamed airway.
Do any inflammatory mediators protect against increased shortening
velocity? NO is the only inflammatory agent known to date to
"protect" airways via this mechanism, causing elevations in cGMP
and cGMP-dependent protein kinase I
activity, which increase myosin
phosphatase activity leading to relaxation
(21,
90). The potential for other
mediators to protect against increased shortening velocity in asthma has not
been studied.
How might inflammatory mediators influence plasticity of smooth muscle? Given the lack of firm evidence that the plasticity-elasticity balance is altered at all in asthma, one can only speculate as to how inflammatory mediators might modulate this balance. However, given the multiple levels of regulation of actin and myosin filament length and tethering of the contractile apparatus to cell membrane adhesion molecules, it seems quite plausible that inflammatory mediators could influence mechanical plasticity (Fig. 4).
|
Fredberg and colleagues (46) provided the first evidence that signaling pathways stimulated by inflammatory mediators might alter the plasticity of ASM. They demonstrated that pharmacological inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) activity produced greater smooth muscle tissue lengthening during sinusoidal force oscillation (meant to simulate force fluctuations during tidal breathing). The treated muscle strips also remained at a greater length after the fluctuations had been stopped compared with untreated tissues (via a mechanism independent of MLC20 phosphorylation) (46). Thus p38 MAPK activity was associated with greater tissue stiffness and greater elasticity, whereas p38 MAPK inhibition promoted greater plasticity. The authors speculated that p38 MAPK activity leads to the phosphorylation and inactivation of heat shock protein 27 (HSP27), one of the proteins involved in capping the end of actin filaments (46). As discussed below, by inhibiting actin filament capping, phosphorylation of HSP27 should promote actin filament lengthening and, by the scheme illustrated in Fig. 3, smooth muscle elasticity.
Actin filament length, like myosin filament length, is actively regulated
by the contractile state of the cell
(55). In addition, many
different growth factors, cytokines, and other mediators promote actin
polymerization (72,
92)
(Fig. 4). The signaling
pathways activated by these mediators converge on the RhoA family of proteins,
such as RhoA and Cdc42, which facilitate actin polymerization in concert with
members of the Wiscott-Aldrich syndrome (WASp/Scar) family
(66) and formin homology
proteins such as mDia (74).
These proteins act through their proline-rich domains to activate profilin,
which directly organizes actin monomer addition
(11). Other proteins that
contribute to actin polymerization by activating profilin include ezrin and
vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP). The process of actin
polymerization is held in check by proteins that cap the actin ends (and thus
slow further monomer addition or prevent monomer removal), such as HSP27,
CapZ/Cap
, tropomodulin, and SM-Lmod (for review, see Ref.
82).
HSP27, when unphosphorylated, caps the barbed end of actin. Phosphorylation
of HSP27 disables its capping of actin and thus allows actin polymerization
and subsequent filament lengthening. HSP27 is constitutively expressed at high
levels in smooth muscle cells, is phosphorylated by p38 MAPK through
MAPK-activated protein kinase in ASM
(49), and is phosphorylated
during contraction, perhaps by protein kinase C
(9). Thus HSP27, like p38 MAPK,
is modulated in smooth muscle by many inflammatory stressors, including
IL-1
, TGF-
, PDGF, angiotensin II, thrombin, and ET-1
(34,
57,
98,
99), providing a mechanism by
which these mediators might decrease smooth muscle plasticity.
How is actin depolymerization regulated? Although it also acts as a
barbed-end capping protein, gelsolin can sever actin filaments
(89), whereas side-binding
proteins such as tropomyosin stabilize actin filaments. Depolymerization of
filamentous actin is mediated in part by ADP/cofilin binding
(7). Smooth muscle relaxants
that increase protein kinase A contribute to the depolymerization of actin by
phosphorylating and inactivating RhoA
(17) and also potentially by
VASP phosphorylation (94).
Protein kinase A-independent actin depolymerization also occurs through an as
yet unknown mechanism (35).
Interestingly, RhoA activity (in addition to stimulating actin
polymerization), acting via the serine/threonine protein kinase LIM-1 kinase,
also inhibits cofilin-induced actin depolymerization in N1E-115 neuroblastoma
and HeLa cells (53,
100). Given that
-adrenergic receptor desensitization occurs in asthma, and many
mediators stimulate RhoA activity, is prevention of depolymerization also a
contributing factor for maintained actin filament length?
Myosin filament length, like actin length, is in a dynamic equilibrium within the ASM cell, with increased filament length during contraction and filament evanescence during stretching (45). During contraction, increased intracellular calcium and MLCK activity appear to be the stimulus for myosin filament formation (33, 69), although resting intracellular calcium levels are also important for the maintenance of myosin filament integrity (33). MLC20 phosphorylation by MLCK is necessary for the unfolding of myosin monomers from the S6 to the S10 conformation for subsequent integration into filaments (37). It is not known whether myosin filament length is different in asthmatic airways, although it is reasonable to suspect that the increased MLCK in ASM from asthmatic subjects might serve to maintain longer myosin filaments. Thus MLCK levels might serve to regulate the plasticity of ASM as well as contraction velocity (similar to RhoA!).
| SUMMARY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| DISCLOSURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
effects on agonist-mediated calcium homeostasis in human airway
smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol
Physiol 273:
L1020-L1028, 1997.
. Eur J
Pharmacol 284:
221-225, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
-induced hyperresponsiveness to [Sar9,Met(O2)11]substance P
in isolated human bronchi. Eur J Pharmacol
379: 87-95,
1999.[Web of Science][Medline]
.
J Biol Chem 273:
22554-22562, 1998.
-adrenoceptor
responsiveness in atopic sensitized airway smooth muscle. Am J
Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 269:
L645-L652, 1995.
2-adrenergic receptor are
involved in distinct pathways of receptor desensitization. J Biol
Chem 264:
12657-12665, 1989.
-adrenoceptor in airway smooth muscle cells: a novel PKA-independent
pathway. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
281: C1468-C1476,
2001.
-induced
-adrenergic hyporesponsiveness in human
airway smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol
Physiol 275:
L491-L501, 1998.
1-induced
smooth muscle actin expression during epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 284:
F911-F924, 2003.
-Thrombin
increases cytosolic calcium and induces human airway smooth muscle cell
proliferation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
13: 205-216,
1995.[Abstract]
-induced human airway smooth muscle
hyporesponsiveness to histamine. Involvement of p38 MAPK NF-
B.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163:
1010-1017, 2001.
2-receptor dysfunction in isolated human bronchi.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158:
1809-1814, 1998.
. Science
286: 1583-1587,
1999.
-induced reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and cell-cell
junctions by Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 in human endothelial cells. J Cell
Physiol 176:
150-165, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. J. Lakser, M. L. Dowell, F. L. Hoyte, B. Chen, T. L. Lavoie, C. Ferreira, L. H. Pinto, N. O. Dulin, P. Kogut, J. Churchill, et al. Steroids augment relengthening of contracted airway smooth muscle: potential additional mechanism of benefit in asthma Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2008; 32(5): 1224 - 1230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kaur, N. S. Holden, S. M. Wilson, M. B. Sukkar, K. F. Chung, P. J. Barnes, R. Newton, and M. A. Giembycz Effect of {beta}2-adrenoceptor agonists and other cAMP-elevating agents on inflammatory gene expression in human ASM cells: a role for protein kinase A Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): L505 - L514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Panettieri Jr., M. I. Kotlikoff, W. T. Gerthoffer, M. B. Hershenson, P. G. Woodruff, I. P. Hall, and S. Banks-Schlegel Airway Smooth Muscle in Bronchial Tone, Inflammation, and Remodeling: Basic Knowledge to Clinical Relevance Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2008; 177(3): 248 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Mitchell, M. L. Dowell, J. Solway, and O. J. Lakser Force Fluctuation induced Relengthening of Acetylcholine-contracted Airway Smooth Muscle Proceedings of the ATS, January 1, 2008; 5(1): 68 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Bao, S. Lim, W. Liao, Y. Lin, C. Thiemermann, B. P. Leung, and W. S. F. Wong Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3beta Inhibition Attenuates Asthma in Mice Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2007; 176(5): 431 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Canning Reflex regulation of airway smooth muscle tone J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2006; 101(3): 971 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Witzenrath, B. Ahrens, S. M. Kube, A. C. Hocke, S. Rosseau, E. Hamelmann, N. Suttorp, and H. Schutte Allergic lung inflammation induces pulmonary vascular hyperresponsiveness Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2006; 28(2): 370 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Lee, H. K. Lee, J. S. Hayflick, Y. C. Lee, and K. D. Puri Inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase {delta} attenuates allergic airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in murine asthma model FASEB J, March 1, 2006; 20(3): 455 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. P. Silveira, J. P. Butler, and J. J. Fredberg Length adaptation of airway smooth muscle: a stochastic model of cytoskeletal dynamics J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2087 - 2098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Chiba, M. Murata, H. Ushikubo, Y. Yoshikawa, A. Saitoh, H. Sakai, J. Kamei, and M. Misawa Effect of Cigarette Smoke Exposure In Vivo on Bronchial Smooth Muscle Contractility In Vitro in Rats Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., December 1, 2005; 33(6): 574 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Duan, J. H. P. Chan, K. McKay, J. R. Crosby, H. H. Choo, B. P. Leung, J. G. Karras, and W. S. F. Wong Inhaled p38{alpha} Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Antisense Oligonucleotide Attenuates Asthma in Mice Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2005; 171(6): 571 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Dowell, O. J. Lakser, W. T. Gerthoffer, J. J. Fredberg, G. L. Stelmack, A. J. Halayko, J. Solway, and R. W. Mitchell Latrunculin B increases force fluctuation-induced relengthening of ACh-contracted, isotonically shortened canine tracheal smooth muscle J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2005; 98(2): 489 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Sylvester The tone of pulmonary smooth muscle: ROK and Rho music? Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): L624 - L630. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Duan, J. H. P. Chan, C. H. Wong, B. P. Leung, and W. S. F. Wong Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase Inhibitor U0126 in an Asthma Mouse Model J. Immunol., June 1, 2004; 172(11): 7053 - 7059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Kjaergaard, O. F. Pedersen, M. R. Miller, T. R. Rasmussen, J. C. Hansen, and L. Molhave Ozone exposure decreases the effect of a deep inhalation on forced expiratory flow in normal subjects J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2004; 96(5): 1651 - 1657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |