|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Critical Care, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202; and 2 Department of Medicine, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, Colorado 80206
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Exhaled nitric oxide
(FENO) measurements provide a noninvasive
approach to the evaluation of airway inflammation. Flow-independent NO
exchange parameters [airway NO transfer factor (DNO) and
airway wall NO concentration (CwNO)] can be estimated from
FENO measurements at low flows and may
elucidate mechanisms of disturbances in NO exchange. We measured
FENO in sedated infants by using an adaptation of a raised lung volume rapid thoracic compression technique that creates forced expiration through a mass-flow controller that lasts
5-10 s, at a constant preset flow. We measured
FENO at expired flows of 50, 25, and 15 ml/s in
five healthy infants (7-31 mo). Median
FENO increased [24, 40, and 60 parts per
billion (ppb)] with decreasing expiratory flows (50, 25, and 15 ml/s).
Group median (range) for DNO and CwNO were 12.7 (3.2-37) × 10
3
nl · s
1 · ppb
1
and 108.9 (49-385) ppb, respectively, similar to
values reported in healthy adults. Exhaled NO is flow
dependent; flow-independent parameters of exhaled NO kinetics can be
assessed in infants and are similar to values described in adults.
airway inflammation; lung function; nitric oxide measurement
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
AIRWAY INFLAMMATION CONTRIBUTES significantly to the pathophysiology of several respiratory diseases, including asthma. Airway inflammation in asthma is characterized by the influx of inflammatory cells and production of inflammatory mediators including cytokines, growth factors, and nitric oxide (NO) (7, 17). Invasive procedures (e.g., bronchoscopy, lavage, and biopsy) have been used to assess inflammation but are primarily research procedures and are unsuitable for repeated monitoring in the clinical setting (3, 6, 14).
Less invasive means of assessing airway inflammation include induced sputum analysis and, more recently, the measurement of exhaled gases, particularly exhaled NO (10, 12). The fractional concentration of exhaled NO (FENO) is widely regarded as a noninvasive inflammatory marker of asthma, and use of FENO has been advocated in the monitoring and diagnosis of other inflammatory lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, and the ciliary dyskinesia syndromes (15). Several factors may affect the reproducibility of FENO measurements, and both the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) have published recommendations aimed at standardizing the techniques used to measure FENO in adults and children (1, 16). The factors that promote reproducibility of FENO measurements include exclusion of the high concentrations of nasal NO, exhalation until the achievement of a NO concentration plateau, and, because NO is flow dependent, standardization of expiratory flow (19).
Recent studies have focused on mathematical models that calculate flow-independent parameters of exhaled airway NO kinetics from measurements of FENO obtained at several expiratory flows (20, 23). In the model, alveolar gas, which contains very low concentrations of NO [<5 parts per billion (ppb)] owing to binding by hemoglobin, ascends the airway, where it is conditioned with NO diffusing from the airway wall to lumen under a concentration gradient. The flow-independent parameters include the NO transfer factor (DNO), the driving concentration for NO diffusion from airway wall to lumen (CwNO), and the alveolar NO concentration.
The techniques used to measure FENO in older children and adults require subject cooperation and, therefore, have been difficult to reproduce in infants. Visual feedback mechanisms are used in older children and adults to help subjects achieve and maintain constant expiratory flow during FENO measurements (8, 13, 19). Older subjects can voluntarily sustain expiratory effort for a prolonged period of time, which permits acquisition of clear NO concentration plateaus. In addition, elevation of the velum and exclusion of nasal NO during expiration have been demonstrated when adults actively expire through a high fixed resistance and target a constant airway pressure or flow (19).
Several studies have measured FENO in infants during tidal breathing (2, 4). Although collection of FENO from tidal breathing in young, uncooperative children is acceptable by both ERS and ATS standards, tidal breathing is characterized by variable expiratory flow and may not exclude nasal NO. Stick and co-workers (24) recently described a method for measuring FENO utilizing a modification of their raised volume rapid thoracic compression technique for obtaining forced expiratory flows in infants. In their study, constant positive airway pressure and expiratory flow were maintained by manual increase of jacket compression pressure. Exclusion of nasal NO resulted from expiration against a resistance. However, Fig. 2 from their published report demonstrates an expiratory period of <2 s. Therefore, it is unclear whether true NO plateaus had been attained and whether NO measurements at lower flows, which require longer expiratory periods to achieve reproducible and accurate NO concentration plateaus, could be obtained by use of this methodology. In addition, flow-independent NO exchange parameters were not reported.
We describe an adaptation of our raised lung volume technique (5, 11) to measure FENO in normal infants. In addition, we report, for the first time, flow-independent NO diffusion parameters in healthy infants.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects. Five full-term normal healthy infants and toddlers (4 female) between 7 and 31 mo of age were evaluated. Subjects had a history negative for asthma, wheezing, lower respiratory tract infection, and congenital heart disease. In addition, they were free of any acute respiratory symptoms for at least 3 wk before testing. Subjects received 50-75 mg/kg po of chloral hydrate and were evaluated while sleeping in the supine position. The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at Indiana University.
Equipment and technique.
A modification of our previously described methodology for obtaining
forced expiratory flows with the raised volume rapid thoracic
compression technique was used (see Fig.
1A) (5, 11). Infants breathed through a two-compartment face mask into a circuit that had an adjustable bias flow from a Sechrist infant ventilator (model IV-100B) connected to NO-free compressed air. A two-compartment mask (dual port series, Hans Rudolph, Kansas City, MO) having a nasal
and an oral compartment was fitted to each infant with a foam seal
(Comfort Seal, Hans Rudolph). Each compartment had a port that was
connected to a three-way sliding valve (Hans Rudolph model 8540) (Fig.
1B). A heated pneumotachometer, which is linear to 160 l/min
(Hans Rudolph model 3700), measured inspiratory and expiratory flow. A
differential pressure transducer (Validyne MP-45-871, Northridge, CA)
measured airway pressure. Occlusion of the circuit's expiratory
segment by a balloon valve (Hans Rudolph ref. 200474) allowed a 20 l/min bias flow to augment inspiratory effort through both the nasal
and oral compartments. Inflation of the respiratory system resulted in
a lung volume at an airway pressure of 30 cmH2O, which was
set by a pressure-relief valve (Sechrist, part IV-317). Opening of the
expiratory segment of the circuit resulted in passive deflation of the
respiratory system through the nasal and oral compartments. Several
inflation-passive deflation cycles to lung volume at 30 cmH2O inhibited inspiratory effort, which produced
a respiratory pause that often persisted for 5-10 s. After the
last inflation, the sliding valve connected to the face mask occluded
the port to the nasal chamber, and forced expiration via the oral
compartment was initiated by rapid inflation of a jacket that encircled
the infant's thorax and abdomen. Jacket inflation was controlled by an
electronic solenoid valve, which connected the jacket to a pressure
reservoir. A three-way sliding valve (Hans Rudolph model 8540)
redirected expiratory flow through a mass-flow controller (Kinetics
Electronics, Yorba Linda, CA), which maintained a constant preset
expiratory flow by continuously adjusting its resistance.
|
Data analysis. Exhaled NO concentration was determined from NO plateau measurements obtained at each preset expiratory flow. The mouth pressure during the plateau was required to be above 15 cmH2O. NO output, the amount of NO exhaled per unit time (nl/s), was calculated as the product of the FENO concentration plateau (ppb) and flow (ml/s). DNO and CwNO were estimated by using a two-compartment mathematical model for NO kinetics described by Silkoff and co-workers (20). DNO and CwNO were calculated from the slope and x-intercept, respectively, derived from the linear regression of NO output and FENO concentration.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The NO concentration and mouth pressure tracings obtained for
subject 4 at three different forced expiratory flows (50, 25, and 15 ml/s) are illustrated in Fig.
2. In Fig. 2A, a flow of 50 ml/s is established within 1 s and remains constant while airway pressure declines secondary to declining lung volume. In addition, NO
concentration rises rapidly to a plateau level. A similar pattern in
expiratory flow and airway pressure is demonstrated in the tracings
obtained at expiratory flows of 25 and 15 ml/s; however, an early
transient peak in FENO is seen followed by a
fall to an NO plateau level. Mean duration of the NO concentration
plateau for these three flows was 2 s, and the airway pressure
remained above 15 cmH2O during the time the NO plateau
level was observed.
|
The values for FENO concentration at each of
the three flows for the five subjects are summarized in Table 1 and
illustrated in Fig. 3. All infants
demonstrated flow dependence of FENO;
FENO concentration decreased with increasing
expiratory flow.
|
|
There was a linear relationship between NO output and
FENO (R2 > 0.91),
for the 5 subjects (Fig. 4). Values for
DNO and CwNO were calculated from the slope and
x-intercept derived from these linear relationships, as
previously described by Silkoff and co-workers (20) (Table
1). The median (range) for
DNO and CwNO were 12.7 × 10
3
nl · s
1 · ppb
1
(range 3.2-37) and 108.9 ppb (range 48.7-384.9),
respectively.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Noninvasive measurement of FENO remains an innovative tool in the evaluation of inflammatory lung disease in older children and adults. In this report, we describe a method for measuring FENO in infants, which stems from a modification of a previously described raised-volume rapid thoracic compression technique used to measure infant pulmonary function in our laboratory. Flow dependence was established in all infants. By measuring FENO at several flows, we estimated flow-independent parameters of FENO (DNO and CwNO) for the first time in infants, which were similar in magnitude to those reported in adults (20).
In the present study, infants were allowed to inhale through both oral and nasal face mask compartments, which improved tolerance to the procedure and resulted in two distinct NO tracings. FENO either ascended from a baseline to a NO plateau level (Fig. 2A) or sharply ascended to an early peak with a subsequent fall to a plateau level (Fig. 2, B and C). The path taken during inspiration explains the observed variation in expiratory NO tracings. Figure 2A corresponds to a NO tracing expected from an oral inspiration, whereas Fig. 2, B and C, corresponds to the expected tracings after nasal inspiration. Prior studies in adults have demonstrated that FENO plateau levels are equivalent for both nasal and oral inspiratory maneuvers (19) once the nasal peak has been washed out. Therefore, nasal contamination of FENO during nasal inspiration is unlikely if plateau levels are achieved.
Nasal contamination of FENO measurements has been a limiting factor in the reproducibility of FENO levels. International guidelines recommend measuring FENO from an active oral exhalation against a high expiratory resistance to achieve vellum closure and thus isolation of the nasal cavity (1, 19). A previous study in infants has reported isolation of the nasal chamber by demonstrating low end-tidal CO2 from the nasal face mask compartment during acquisition of FENO measurements, which we have also reproduced in several infants (24). Active oral exhalation is impossible to attain in sedated infants, and posterior isolation of the nasal compartment is difficult to evaluate noninvasively. It has been our observation that FENO rises in some subjects as mouth pressure decreases, which may indicate posterior nasal contamination from the nasal cavity at expiratory pressures that are higher than those used in adults. Therefore, in these subjects, we measured FENO at high positive pressures to minimize the contribution from nasal contamination.
FENO and DNO levels were markedly elevated in one of the infants (subject 5). A positive family history of asthma in this infant would make the presence of underlying airway inflammation in this subject plausible. Additionally, adult studies have also demonstrated a large variability for DNO in healthy subjects (9, 18, 20). Whether the high levels in this infant stem from subclinical inflammation or reflect normal variability of FENO in infants requires further studies in a larger sample of subjects.
Studies in adults suggest that flow-independent parameters of FENO may help elucidate the mechanisms underlying perturbation of FENO levels (20, 22). DNO and CwNO values in the present report provide initial data for establishing normal values in infants, and our estimates for CwNO are consistent with values in adults. Although the mean and median DNO values fell within the values previously reported in adults, the range for DNO was skewed to the right because two of our infants (subjects 1 and 5) had DNO values that were higher than those reported in adults. The higher variability in flow-independent parameters observed in these infants could be explained by the mathematical model used for their calculation. The model assumes a homogeneous conducting airways compartment, where DNO is largely proportional to the airway wall surface area. Infant airway radial distance and wall thickness are probably smaller than in adults, and airway wall surface area is large relative to airway volume, introducing variability, which could result in a wider range of normal values for flow-independent parameters in healthy infants. The relative importance of these factors remains unclear secondary to limited anatomical and physiological infant data at this time. In addition, our limited population of healthy infants may include subjects that are predisposed to develop asthma at an older age and thus increase intersubject variability.
Tsoukias and George (23) have previously described a two-compartment model of NO exchange dynamics, which calculates bronchial flux (the maximal quantity of NO diffusing into exhaled gas per unit time) from the linear relationship between NO output and expiratory flow. This measurement is equivalent in adults to the product of DNO and CwNO derived from the present model by Silkoff and co-workers (20). Bronchial flux values calculated for our subjects by both techniques differ significantly. The model described by Silkoff and co-workers derives bronchial NO flux from measurements obtained at low expiratory flow rates, whereas Tsoukias and co-workers derive flux from measurements obtained at high expiratory flow rates, and the discrepancy is difficult to explain from the small number of subjects evaluated. It is not clear which model may best describe the infant lung, which is not a scaled down version of the adult lung. The relative size of airway to surface area and lung volume, as well as the time constant for lung emptying is greater in the infant than in the adult lung (21). However, the ability to separate bronchial flux components into DNO and CwNO is attractive because these measurements are themselves potentially useful in the evaluation of inflammatory airway disease in infants.
In conclusion, we report a modification of our raised volume rapid thoracic compression technique to obtain FENO measurements in infants, which approximates ATS and ERS standards for adults. We were able to measure FENO at several expiratory flows, and calculate flow-independent parameters of NO exchange. The values for FENO, DNO, and CwNO paralleled those previously reported in adults. Future studies are required to establish normative data for FENO and flow-independent parameters of NO exchange in both healthy infants and infants with lung disease. This technique offers a new noninvasive tool with the potential to expand our understanding of infant lung disease.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant 54062.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. S. Tepper, Section of Pediatric Pulmonology, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, 702 Barnhill Dr., Rm. 2750, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5225 (E-mail: rtepper{at}iupui.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
First published January 31, 2003;10.1152/japplphysiol.00758.2002
Received 19 August 2002; accepted in final form 22 January 2003.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
American Thoracic Society.
Recommendations for standardized procedures for the online and offline measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide in adults and children
1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
160:
2104-2117,
1999
2.
Baraldi, E,
Dario C,
Ongaro R,
Scollo M,
Azzolin NM,
Panza N,
Paganini N,
and
Zacchello F.
Exhaled nitric oxide concentrations during treatment of wheezing exacerbation in infants and young children.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
159:
1284-1288,
1999
3.
Bush, A,
and
Pohunek P.
Brush biopsy and mucosal biopsy.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
162:
S18-S22,
2000
4.
Elphick, HE,
Demoncheaux EAG,
Ritson S,
Higenbottam TW,
and
Everard ML.
Exhaled nitric oxide is reduced in infants with cystic fibrosis.
Thorax
56:
151-152,
2001
5.
Feher, A,
Castile R,
Kisling J,
Angelicchio C,
Filbrun D,
Flucke R,
and
Tepper R.
Flow limitation in normal infants: a new method for forced expiratory maneuvers from raised lung volumes.
J Appl Physiol
80:
2019-2025,
1996
6.
Ferguson, AC,
and
Wong FWM
Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic children: correlation with macrophages and eosinophils in broncholavage fluid.
Chest
96:
988-991,
1989
7.
Gaston, B,
and
Stamler JS.
Nitrogen oxides.
In: The Lung, edited by Crystal RG,
and West JB.. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1997, p. 239-249.
8.
Ho, LP,
Innes JA,
and
Greening AP.
Exhaled nitric oxide is not elevated in the inflammatory airways diseases of cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis.
Eur Respir J
12:
1290-1294,
1998[Abstract].
9.
Hogman, M,
Drca N,
Ehrstedt C,
and
Merilainen P.
Exhaled nitric oxide partitioned into alveolar, lower airways and nasal contributions.
Respir Med
94:
985-991,
2000[ISI][Medline].
10.
Jatakanon, A,
Lim S,
Kharitonov SA,
Chung KF,
and
Barnes PJ.
Correlation between exhaled nitric oxide, sputum eosinophils, and methacholine responsiveness in patients with mild asthma.
Thorax
53:
91-95,
1998[Abstract].
11.
Jones, MH,
Davis SD,
Kisling JA,
Howard JM,
Castile R,
and
Tepper RS.
Flow limitation in infants assessed by negative expiratory pressure.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
161:
713-717,
2000
12.
Jongste, JC,
and
Alving K.
Gas analysis.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
162:
S23-S27,
2000
13.
Karadag, B,
James AL,
Gültekin E,
Wilson NM,
and
Bush A.
Nasal and lower airway level of nitric oxide in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia.
Eur Respir J
13:
1402-1405,
1999[Abstract].
14.
Khan, TZ,
Wagener JS,
Bost T,
Martinez J,
Accurso FJ,
and
Riches DW.
Early pulmonary inflammation in infants with cystic fibrosis [see comments].
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
151:
1075-1082,
1995[Abstract].
15.
Kharitonov, SA,
and
Barnes PJ.
Clinical aspects of exhaled nitric oxide.
Eur Respir J
16:
781-792,
2000[Abstract].
16.
Kharitonov, S,
Alving K,
and
Barnes PJ.
Exhaled and nasal nitric oxide measurements: recommendations. The European Respiratory Society Task Force.
Eur Respir J
10:
1683-1693,
1997[ISI][Medline].
17.
Larsen, GL,
and
Holt PG.
The concept of airway inflammation.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
162:
S2-S6,
2000
18.
Pietropaoli, AP,
Perillo IB,
Torres A,
Perkins PT,
Frasier LM,
Utell MJ,
Frampton MW,
and
Hyde RW.
Simultaneous measurement of nitric oxide production by conducting and alveolar airways of humans.
J Appl Physiol
87:
1532-1542,
1999
19.
Silkoff, PE,
McClean PA,
Slutsky AS,
Furlott HG,
Hoffstein E,
Wakita S,
Chapman KR,
Szalai JP,
and
Zamel N.
Marked flow-dependence of exhaled nitric oxide using a new technique to exclude nasal nitric oxide.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
155:
260-267,
1997[Abstract].
20.
Silkoff, PE,
Sylvester JT,
Zamel N,
and
Permutt S.
Airway nitric oxide diffusion in asthma: role in pulmonary function and bronchial responsiveness.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
161:
1218-1228,
2000
21.
Tepper RS, Jones M, Davis S, Kisling J, and Castile R. Rate
constant for forced expiration decreases with lung growth during
infancy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999.
22.
Tsoukias, NM,
Shin HW,
Wilson AF,
and
George SC.
A single-breath technique with variable flow rate to characterize nitric oxide exchange dynamics in the lungs.
J Appl Physiol
91:
477-487,
2001
23.
Tsoukias, NM,
and
George SC.
A two-compartment model of pulmonary nitric oxide exchange dynamics.
J Appl Physiol
85:
653-666,
1998
24.
Wildhaber, JH,
Hall GL,
and
Stick SM.
Measurements of exhaled nitric oxide with the single-breath technique and positive expiratory pressure in infants.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
159:
74-78,
1999
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
ATS/ERS Recommendations for Standardized Procedures for the Online and Offline Measurement of Exhaled Lower Respiratory Nitric Oxide and Nasal Nitric Oxide, 2005 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2005; 171(8): 912 - 930. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. George, M. Hogman, S. Permutt, and P. E. Silkoff Modeling pulmonary nitric oxide exchange J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2004; 96(3): 831 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |