Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 94: 199-204, 2003; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00634.2002
8750-7587/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Banks, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Banks, J. M.
Vol. 94, Issue 1, 199-204, January 2003

Middle ear pressure change during controlled breathing with gas mixtures containing nitrous oxide

William J. Doyle and Juliane M. Banks

Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and the Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The change in middle ear pressure while breathing gas mixtures containing N2O was studied in four monkeys. At each of three experimental sessions, monkeys were anesthetized, acclimated for 60 min, breathed with room air for 60 min, and then breathed with 5, 10, or 20% N2O for 60 min. Middle ear pressure, rectal temperature, and vital signs were recorded throughout. The time constant for blood-middle ear N2O exchange was calculated from these data. Middle ear pressure decreased during acclimation, was stable during air breathing, and increased during N2O breathing. The rate of pressure change was similar for both ears of each animal and was directly related to N2O percent. The calculated time constant ranged from 0.003 to 0.008 min-1 across animals but was not different for a given ear across sessions. These results show that breathing gas mixtures containing N2O causes predictable and quantifiable increases in middle ear pressure.

time constant; animal model; gas exchange


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

THE EFFICIENCY OF THE MIDDLE ear system as an energy coupler between air and liquid is inversely related to the absolute value of the pressure difference between the middle ear airspace (ME) and the ambient environment (5). Because the ME is a relatively fixed-volume, temperature-stable biological gas pocket, its pressure depends on the number of contained moles of gas. By extension, when isolated from communication with the external environment (e.g., time between successive Eustachian tube openings), the rate of change in total ME pressure depends on the rates of transmucosal (ME-blood) exchange of the physiological gases (H2O, N2, O2, and CO2) and on the rates of production (CO2) and consumption (O2) of the reactive gases. The transmucosal gas exchange rate is determined by factors that are independent of the particular gas species such as ME surface area, mucosal thickness, and volume blood flow and by gas-specific factors such as the extant partial-pressure gradient and species solubility in the mucosa and/or blood (5).

For both normal and diseased MEs, the measured ME-blood O2 and CO2 pressure gradients are approximately equal to zero, whereas that for N2 approximates 50 Torr (10, 12, 13). Therefore, total pressure of the isolated ME will decrease as N2 diffuses from ME to blood, a process that will continue until N2 pressure equilibrium is established. This loss of N2 from the ME drives the ME-ambient total pressure gradient to disequilibrium, thereby compromising the efficiency of the transducer function of the middle ear system. Periodic opening of the Eustachian tube allows for bolus gas exchange between nasopharynx (near ambient pressure) and ME, which decreases the ME-ambient pressure gradient. Thus the transducer function of the middle ear system is constrained by the efficiency of ME pressure regulation, which, ideally, maintains a dynamic equilibrium between volume gas loss due to transmucosal N2 exchange and volume gas influx during Eustachian tube openings (5).

Whereas many previous studies described the contribution of Eustachian tube function to ME pressure regulation (1, 2, 18), relatively few measured the rate of pressure decrease due to transmucosal exchange of the physiological gases; i.e., the demand placed on the Eustachian tube for gas resupply (6-8). Regarding the latter, it was shown that the exchange rates of reactive gases (O2 ad CO2) are very fast (relatively large time constants vis à vis inert gases) and primarily diffusion limited, whereas the exchange of the inert gas N2 is very slow and primarily perfusion limited. Because the N2 exchange rate is the main determinant of the rate of total ME pressure change, an accurate estimate of that rate is fundamental to understanding ME pressure regulation.

At physiological partial-pressure gradients, the rate of transmucosal N2 exchange is not easily measured because of its extremely slow rate of exchange (6, 7). To overcome this difficulty, the more soluble, perfusion-limited gas N2O has been used to study transmucosal inert gas exchange (7-9, 11, 15, 19, 20). On the basis of solubility considerations, the transmucosal exchange of N2O is estimated to be 30-40 times faster than that of N2 at identical driving pressures, thus allowing for experimental measurement of its exchange rate over a reasonable time period.

Previously, an increase in ME pressure was reported for anesthetized patients breathing gas mixtures that included N2O (3, 4, 11, 14-16), and, more recently, that response was used to compare transmucosal inert gas-exchange rates between ears with and without pneumatized mastoid regions and between ears with and without concurrent disease (9, 17, 19, 20). Although this approach provides a promising method to study the effects of altered ME conditions on transmucosal inert gas exchange, the majority of data for blood to ME N2O exchange were acquired in the surgical setting where control over certain confounding variables such as gas mixture, blood-gas partial pressures, body temperature, and forced tubal openings was not maintained. Also, data presentation was limited to comparative descriptions of pressure-time functions, and no formal method was developed to quantify the results in terms of a transmucosal time constant. In this paper, blood-to-ME exchange of N2O was studied in cynomolgus monkeys under well-controlled experimental conditions. A mathematical description of the exchange process and formal methods to estimate the time constant for transmucosal N2O exchange are presented.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protocol. Four juvenile cynomolgus monkeys weighing between 2.1 and 3.2 kg were used in the experiments. For each of three experimental sessions done on different days, the monkey was sedated with 30 mg of ketamine and anesthetized with "monkey mix" (10 mg/kg ketamine, 2 mg/kg xylazine; 0.3 mg/kg acepromazine). The monkey was monitored for ME pressure by tympanometry, for temperature by rectal probe, and for vital signs over a 60-min period (10-min intervals) to allow for physiological acclimation to the anesthetized state. Then the monkey was intubated, and the endotracheal tube was placed on-line to the output of a Harvard respirator (model 661; South Natick, MA). The respirator was adjusted to deliver 30 ml gas/stroke at 40 strokes/min. The animal was breathed with room air for 60 min. Then the intake to the respirator was switched to the experimental gas mixture, and the animal was breathed for 60 min with X% N2O, 20% O2, balance N2 at ambient pressure, where X = 5, 10, and 20% for sessions 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Throughout the 120 min of respirator-controlled breathing, ME pressure was recorded bilaterally at 5-min intervals by use of a clinical tympanometer (GSI-33 middle ear analyzer, model 1733, Littleton, MA). Vital signs and rectal temperature were recorded at regular intervals. At the termination of the experimental session and after the monkey had recovered from the anesthesia, it was returned to the vivarium. This study was performed in accordance with the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. et seq.). The protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Research Committee at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh.

Model description. Under certain restrictive conditions, the primary outcome variable for these experiments, change in ME pressure, is equal to the change in ME N2O pressure. Below we present a mathematical description that defines these conditions and the methods for calculating the time constant for transmucosal N2O exchange.

The pressure of any closed, gas filled compartment such as the ME (m) is described by the general gas law, or
P<SUP>m</SUP>V<SUP>m</SUP> = <IT>N</IT><SUP>m</SUP><IT>R</IT>T<SUP>m</SUP> (1)
where Pm is pressure, Vm is volume, Nm is number of moles of gas, Tm is the temperature of the ME, and R is the general gas constant. Total ME pressure is equal to the sum of the partial pressures of the physiological gases and any represented, nonphysiological species (e.g., N2O). The change in total ME pressure is equal to the sum of the changes in the partial pressures of those gases, or
&dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP>/&dgr;<IT>t=</IT>(&dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>O<SUB>2</SUB></SUB> + &dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB> + &dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>H<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> + &dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB></SUB> + &dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>g</SUB>)/&dgr;<IT>t</IT> (2)
where P<UP><SUB>g</SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP> is the partial pressure of a test gas. Under physiological conditions and at constant blood partial pressures for O2 and CO2, the ME-blood partial-pressure gradient for O2 and CO2 is ~0 Torr and the ME is saturated with water vapor (10, 12, 13). Because there is no gradient to drive the ME-blood exchange of these gases, delta P<UP><SUB>O<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP>delta t delta P<UP><SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP>/delta t = delta P<UP><SUB>H<SUB>2O</SUB></SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP>/delta t = 0 Torr/min. Thus, for the ME of an acclimated, anesthetized animal breathing gas mixtures containing N2O, Eq. 2 reduces to
&dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP>/&dgr;<IT>t=</IT>(&dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB></SUB> + &dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>)/&dgr;<IT>t</IT> (3)
Direct measurements in monkeys show that the change in ME N2 pressure at extant ME-blood gradients as high as 50 Torr is not measurable in experiments lasting for 4 h (6-8). Therefore, in relatively short-duration experiments, the effective N2 exchange rate is 0 Torr/min, and Eq. 3 becomes
&dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP>/&dgr;<IT>t=</IT>&dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>/&dgr;<IT>t</IT> (4)
In the experiments described here, the N2O pressure in the arterial blood is increased during controlled breathing with the gas mixtures. There, the change in the number of moles of N2O in the ME compartment must be equal to the extant difference between the number of moles of that gas in the local arterial (a) and venous (v) blood compartments, or
&dgr;N<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> = (N<SUP>a</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> − N<SUP>v</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>) (5)
For blood (b), the number of moles of a gas is directly related to the partial pressure (P<UP><SUB>g</SUB><SUP>b</SUP></UP>) and solubility (S<UP><SUB>g</SUB><SUP>b</SUP></UP>) of the gas in blood and the extant, local blood volume (Vb), or for N2O
N<SUP>b</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> = V<SUP>b</SUP>P<SUP>b</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>S<SUP>b</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> (6)
Recognizing that N2O solubility is the same for arterial and venous blood (S<UP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><SUP>b</SUP></UP>O), substituting the expressions for pressure from Eq. 1 and 6 for moles of gas in Eq. 5 and rearranging terms yields
&dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> = (<IT>R</IT>T<SUP>m</SUP>S<SUP>b</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>)(P<SUP>a</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>V<SUP>a</SUP> − P<SUP>v</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>V<SUP>v</SUP>)(V<SUP>m</SUP>)<SUP>−1</SUP> (7)
Dividing both sides of this equation by a time interval (delta t) and noting that by continuity Va/delta t = Vv/delta t = ME blood flow (Qm), yields
&dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>/&dgr;<IT>t=</IT>(R<A><AC>Q</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SUP>m</SUP>T<SUP>m</SUP>S<SUP>b</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>)(P<SUP>a</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> − P<SUP>v</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>)(V<SUP>m</SUP>)<SUP>−1</SUP> (8)
Under the experimental conditions, the ME pressure of N2O must at all times be less than or equal to that of the local arterial and venous blood such that
P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> ≤ P<SUP>a</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> and P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> ≤ P<SUP>v</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> (9a)
or
−P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> ≥ −P<SUP>v</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> (9b)
Adding P<SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB><SUP>a</SUP> to both sides of Eq. 9b yields
P<SUP>a</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> − P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> ≥ P<SUP>a</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> − P<SUP>v</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> (10a)
or
F<SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>(P<SUP>a</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> − P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>) = P<SUP>a</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> − P<SUP>v</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> (10b)
where 1 >=  FN2O >=  0. Substituting the result from Eq. 10b into Eq. 8 and combining with Eq. 4 yields
&dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>/&dgr;<IT>t=</IT>&dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP>/&dgr;<IT>t=</IT>(F<SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB><IT>R</IT>Q<SUP>m</SUP>T<SUP>m</SUP>S<SUP>b</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>)(P<SUP>a</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> − P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>)(V<SUP>m</SUP>)<SUP>−1</SUP> (11)
This equation relates the rate of change in ME pressure (delta Pm/delta t), determinable from experimental data) to the product of the extant arterial-ME N2O pressure gradient (P<UP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><SUP>a</SUP></UP>O - P<UP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP>O, determinable from experimental data); the general gas constant (R); the inverse of ME volume [(Vm)-1, a constant]; ME temperature (Tm, measured to be constant); N2O solubility in blood (S<UP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><SUP>b</SUP></UP>O, a constant); local volume blood flow (Qm), and the ratio of arterial-venous N2O gradient to arterial-ME N2O gradient (FN2O). If Qm and FN2O are constants for each experiment, Eq. 11 is linear and the rate of change in ME pressure divided by the extant arterial-ME N2O pressure gradient is a time constant, such that
(&dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP>/&dgr;<IT>t</IT>)/(P<SUP>a</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> − P<SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>) = F<SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>(<IT>R</IT><A><AC>Q</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SUP>m</SUP>T<SUP>m</SUP>S<SUP>b</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB>)(V<SUP>m</SUP>)<SUP>−1</SUP> = <IT>K</IT><SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> (12)
Note that violation of these assumptions (i.e., within-session changes in Qm or FN2O) will be reflected as a nonlinear relationship between the rate of ME pressure change (delta Pm/delta t) and gradient (P<UP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><SUP>a</SUP></UP>O - P<UP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP>O), and consequently linearity between those variables is a testable hypothesis of assumption validity.

Data structure. The primary data for each experiment consist of the repeated measurements of bilateral ME pressure during the period of controlled breathing with the gas mixture. To calculate a time constant for transmucosal N2O exchange by Eq. 12, these data were transformed into estimates of the extant arterial-ME N2O pressure gradient and of the instantaneous rate of change in ME pressure.

For the period of controlled breathing with the N2O gas mixture, arterial N2O pressure (P<UP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><SUP>a</SUP></UP>O) is assumed to be constant and was estimated by multiplying the physiological blood N2 pressure (approx 570 Torr at 760 Torr ambient pressure) by the fraction of N2O in the breathing mixture (i.e., % substitution of N2O for N2). At the onset of breathing the gas mixture (t = 0 min), ME N2O pressure (P<UP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP>O) is 0 Torr and, by Eq. 4, that partial pressure at any time can be estimated as the difference between ME pressure at that time (t = i) and ME pressure at t = 0. These estimates were used to calculate the extant ME-blood N2O pressure gradient [G<SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB><SUP>(<IT>t=i</IT>)</SUP>] as given by
G<SUP>(<IT>t=i</IT>)</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> = P<SUP>a</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> − (P<SUP>m(<IT>t=i</IT>)</SUP> − P<SUP>m(<IT>t=</IT>0)</SUP>) (13)
The instantaneous rate of change in ME pressure was not measured in the experiment. However, that rate can be estimated by the slope of the linear portion of the function relating ME pressure to time. Here, we calculated the slope of that function for the 60 min of controlled breathing with the N2O gas mixture by using least-squares linear regression. That procedure also provides an estimate of the goodness of a linear fit to the data distribution that is given by the percent variance in ME pressure explained by the regression on time (r2 × 100%). For all experimental sessions, that estimate was >89%, and consequently we accepted the regression slope as a reasonable estimate of the instantaneous rate of change in ME pressure, delta Pm/delta t.

From Eq. 12, the time constant for N2O exchange was calculated as the ratio of the instantaneous rate of change in ME pressure to the average (over the period of breathing the N2O gas mixture) value of the estimated ME-blood N2O pressure gradient, or
<IT>K</IT><SUP>m</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> = (&dgr;P<SUP>m</SUP>/&dgr;<IT>t</IT>)/G<SUP>(avg)</SUP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB>O</SUB> (14)
The calculated time constant was examined for consistency across ears and animals and for independence of gas mixture (i.e., session). Vital signs and temperature measurements served to document stable values during the data collection period of each experimental session.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Figure 1 shows the left and right ME pressure-time functions of one monkey (monkey 2) for the experimental sessions that included a 60-min period of controlled breathing with a gas mixture containing 5 (A), 10 (B), and 20% (C) N2O. For all three sessions, the 60-min acclimation period (minutes 0-60) was characterized by a variable magnitude decrease in ME pressure. This decrease was temporally related to a concomitant decrease in body temperature (data not shown). During the second 60-min period (minutes 60-120) wherein the animal was breathed by respirator with room air, bilateral ME pressures were relatively stable, indicating no measurable gas transfers to or from the ME. In contrast, the third 60-min period corresponding to controlled breathing with the experimental gas mixture (minutes 120-180) was characterized by a near-constant rate of ME pressure increase. The rate of change in ME pressure was similar for both ears at each session, and that rate was greater at higher percent N2O compositions in the breathing mixture. This temporal pattern of ME pressure change characterized the experiments on the other three monkeys, although the pressure-time function of monkey 4 for controlled breathing with gas mixtures containing 20% N2O showed bilateral evidence of passive Eustachian tube opening (an abrupt decrease in ME pressure).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Left () and right (open circle ) middle ear (ME) pressure as a function of time for monkey 2 at experimental sessions 1 (A; 5% N2O), (B; 10% N2O), and 3 (C; 20% N2O). For each session, the data for the first 60 min correspond to an acclimation period, for the second 60 min to respirator-controlled breathing with room air, and for the third 60 min to respirator-controlled breathing with the N2O gas mixture.

The slope of the ME pressure-time function for the 60 min (45 min for monkey 4 at session 3) of controlled breathing with the experimental gas mixture estimates the instantaneous rate of change in ME pressure effected by transmucosal N2O exchange. That slope (± standard error of the estimate) calculated by linear regression is reported for all experiments in Table 1. Also listed for each experiment is the square of the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient (r2) for the pressure vs. time data. The large r2 value for all experiments documents an excellent goodness of fit for the linear model (explained variance >=  89%). The rate of ME pressure change at each session was similar for the two ears of each monkey. For each ear, that rate increased in direct proportion to the percent N2O composition of the breathing mixture with approximate rate ratios of 4:2:1 for experiments conducted using gas mixtures containing 20, 10, and 5% N2O, respectively.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   linear regression equation relating middle ear pressure to N2O exposure time for all experiments

Figure 2 shows a scatterplot of the rate of change in ME pressure vs. the arterial-ME N2O pressure gradient for the eight ears at the three study sessions. At any session, there was a large variability in the rate of pressure change for the eight ears, but those rates were more similar for the left and right ears of each monkey compared with the rates for different monkeys. Also, for individual ears there was an apparent linear relationship between the rate of ME pressure change and the respective arterial-ME N2O pressure gradient. The time constant for transmucosal N2O exchange was estimated as the ratio of the rate of ME pressure change to the respective N2O pressure gradient (See Eq. 14). Table 2 lists the time constant calculated for each experiment. The value of the time constant ranged from 0.003 to 0.008 min-1, was similar for the two ears of each monkey, and was not influenced by the percent N2O in the breathing mixture.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Scatterplot of the rate of ME pressure change (slope of the ME pressure-time function) vs. the estimated arterial-ME N2O gradient for the 8 ears of the 4 monkeys at the 3 study sessions. RT, right; LT, left. Note that the rate of ME pressure change for each ear increases directly with increasing N2O gradient. The time constant for transmucosal N2O exchange equals the ratio of the rate of ME pressure change to the corresponding arterial-ME N2O gradient.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Calculated time-constant for transmucosal N2O exchange for each experiment


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In these experiments, ME pressure showed a decrease attributable to decreasing body temperature over the first hour after administration of the anesthetic. For the 1-h period of air breathing, ME pressure was relatively stable for all ears at all study sessions. This documents no measurable gas transfers to or from the ME during that period (Eq. 2), a requirement of the method used to estimate the N2O time constant. Like the results of clinical studies reported previously (3, 4, 11, 14-16), breathing gas mixtures containing N2O caused significant increases in the tympanometrically measured ME pressure of all four monkeys. Moreover, for the 60 min of controlled breathing with each experimental gas mixture, the relationship between ME pressure and exposure time was linear. From Eq. 11, this observation requires that the effects of gas exchange on the arterial-ME N2O pressure gradient be negligible for that interval (i.e., P<UP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><SUP>a</SUP></UP>O - P<UP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP>O at t = 0 approx  P<UP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><SUP>a</SUP></UP>O - P<UP><SUB>N<SUB>2</SUB></SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP>O at t = 60) and that the ME volume, blood flow, and the gradient ratio (FN2O) be constant over that interval. In support of the former, calculation of the percent change in gradient {[G(t = 60)N2- G(t = 0)N2O]/G(t = 0)N2O × 100%} yielded average values of 9 ± 3, 12 ± 1, and 10 ± 2% for sessions 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Thus the requirements of the mathematical description underlying estimation of the time constant appear to be satisfied by the conditions of the experiment. The measured value of the time constant for transmucosal N2O exchange in juvenile cynomolgus monkeys is on the order of 10-3 min-1.

The linear relationship between the rate of ME pressure change and the calculated arterial-ME N2O gradient for each ear shows that the time constant is independent of the N2O percent composition in the breathing mixture. This implies that the above listed parameters are relatively constant over the extended period of time between sessions and that the mucosal blood flow (Qm) and the gradient ratio (FN2O) are independent of the arterial N2O pressure. These results show that measurement of the time constant for transmucosal N2O exchange using the methods described in this report is reproducible over time. Moreover, in experiments designed to evaluate the effects of specific ME conditions on transmucosal inert gas exchange, a specific driving partial pressure for the exchange (e.g., N2O percent composition of breathing mixture) is not required but can be chosen on the basis of the requirements of each experiment.

A practical application of measuring the time constant for transmucosal N2O exchange is to estimate that constant for N2, a physiological gas whose transmucosal exchange is rate limiting to the development of ME under pressure. However, the gradient ratio (FN2O) included as a parameter in Eq. 12 may limit the use of the time constant measured for one gas species to estimate that for a second. Specifically, inert gas-exchange constants are usually assumed to be scaled as the ratio of their respective solubilities in the exchange medium, i.e., Kg1 = Kg2(Sg1/Sg2) where Kg1 and Kg2 and Sg1 and Sg2 are the transmucosal time constants (Kg2 measured, Kg1 estimated) and known solubilities, respectively, for two inert gas species. However, the ratio of time constants defined by Eq. 12 for any two gases is Fg1Sg1/Fg2Sg2, which reduces to a ratio of gas solubilities if and only if Fg1 = Fg2. The validity of identical gradient ratios for different inert gas species is not known and must be evaluated empirically by experiment. Lacking proof of that identity, the measured time constant for transmucosal N2O exchange cannot be used with certainty to estimate the time constant for transmucosal exchange of other inert gases such as N2. However, conditional relationships defined for the N2O time constant will characterize the N2 time constant. For example, if the measured value of the N2O time constant is X times greater under condition 1 compared with condition 2, the expected ratio of the N2 time constants for those conditions will also be X. Specifically, if KN2O = XKN2O', then by substitution: KN2O (FN2SN2O/FN2SN2) XKN2' (FN2OSN2O/FN2SN2), or KN2 = XKN2', where the prime (') designates a different condition.

The method to estimate the time constant for transmucosal inert gas exchange described in this report is applicable to situations in which the exchange can be modeled as a primarily perfusion limited transfer of gas across a biological barrier. For example, it can be used to describe quantitatively the effects of abnormal ME conditions such as mucosal inflammation or arrested mastoid air-cell development on transmucosal inert gas exchange. However, other pathological conditions such as the presence of a ME effusion introduce additional exchange compartments (ME fluid) into the system and require significant modification of these methods for accurate estimation of a time constant.

Previous studies reported increases in ME pressure for anesthetized humans breathing complex gas mixtures that included N2O (3, 4, 11, 14-16). Whereas pressure-time functions can be abstracted from those data, transformation to estimates of the time constant for transmucosal N2O exchange is valid only if the measured ME pressure change is wholly attributable to transfer of that gas from blood to ME. This requires that, for the period of data collection, no other gases are in disequilibrium between blood and ME (with the exception of gases that diffuse too slowly to affect pressure), body temperature remains constant, the anesthetic does not change ME blood flow, and the Eustachian tube does not vent gas. Because the gas mixture is administered to induce anesthesia and pressure venting via the Eustachian tube is an early response to the rapidly developing ME overpressures, it is doubtful that those requirements are met during the time between onset of breathing the anesthetic gas mixture and first tubal opening. Therefore, the use of these analytic methods is best reserved for the experimental setting. There, anesthesia can be induced by a route independent of breathing mixture, sufficient periods of time can be allotted for acclimation to the anesthetized condition (allowing for the reequilibration of the physiological gases between ME and blood and stabilization of body temperature), and the N2O composition of the breathing mixture can be adjusted to prevent the rapid development of ME overpressures that force Eustachian tube openings.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The investigators thank Samir N. Ghadiali for critical review of the equations presented in this manuscript and for constructive criticisms.


    FOOTNOTES

This study was supported in part by National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grant DC-01260.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: W. J. Doyle, Dept. of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 3705 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (E-mail: docdoyle2{at}aol.com).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

10.1152/japplphysiol.00634.2002

Received 11 July 2002; accepted in final form 3 September 2002.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Bluestone, CD, and Doyle WJ. Anatomy and physiology of Eustachian tube and middle ear related to otitis media. J Allergy Clin Immunol 81: 997-1003, 1988[Web of Science][Medline].

2.   Bunne, M, Magnuson B, Falk B, and Hellstrom S. Eustachian tube function varies over time in children with secretory otitis media. Acta Otolaryngol 120: 716-723, 2000[Medline].

3.   Casey, WF, and Drake-Lee AB. Nitrous oxide and middle ear pressure. A study of induction methods in children. Anaesthesia 37: 896-900, 1982[Web of Science][Medline].

4.   Chinn, K, Brown OE, Manning SC, and Crandell CC. Middle ear pressure variation: effect of nitrous oxide. Laryngoscope 107: 357-363, 1997[Web of Science][Medline].

5.   Doyle, WJ. Middle ear pressure regulation. In: The Function and Mechanics of Normal, Diseased and Reconstructed Middle Ears, edited by Rosowski JJ, and Merchant SN.. The Hague, Netherlands: Kugler, 2000, p. 3-21.

6.   Doyle, WJ, and Seroky JT. Middle ear gas exchange in rhesus monkeys. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103: 636-645, 1994[Web of Science][Medline].

7.   Doyle, WJ, Alper CM, and Seroky JT. Trans-mucosal inert gas exchange constants for the monkey middle ear. Auris Nasus Larynx 26: 5-12, 1999[Medline].

8.   Doyle, WJ, Seroky JT, and Alper CM. Gas exchange across the middle ear mucosa in monkeys. Estimation of exchange rate. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121: 887-892, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9.   Elam, M, Harell M, Luntz M, Fuchs C, and Sade J. Middle ear pressure variations during 50% N2O anesthesia as a function of mastoid pneumatization. Am J Otol 19: 709-711, 1998[Web of Science][Medline].

10.   Felding, JU. Middle ear gas---its composition in the normal and in the tubulated ear. A methodological and clinical study. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 536: 1-57, 1998[Medline].

11.   Flisberg, K, Hallgarde U, and Paulsson B. Tympanometry before and during nitrous oxide anesthesia with middle ear effusion. Am J Otolaryngol 3: 344-348, 1982[Web of Science][Medline].

12.   Hergils, L, and Magnuson B. Middle ear gas composition in pathologic conditions: mass spectrometry in otitis media with effusion and atelectasis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 106: 743-745, 1997[Web of Science][Medline].

13.   Hergils, L, and Magnuson B. Human middle ear gas composition studied by mass spectrometry. Acta Otolaryngol 110: 92-99, 1999.

14.   Karabiyik, L, Bozkirli F, Celebi H, and Goksu N. Effect of nitrous oxide on middle ear pressure: a comparison between inhalational anaesthesia with nitrous oxide and TIVA. Eur J Anaesthesiol 13: 27-32, 1996[Web of Science][Medline].

15.   Ostfeld, E, Crispin M, Blonder J, and Szeinberg A. Middle ear gas composition during nitrous oxide-oxygen ventilation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 89: 165-167, 1980[Web of Science][Medline].

16.   Richards, SH, O'Neill G, and Wilson F. Middle-ear pressure variations during general anaesthesia. J Laryngol Otol 96: 883-892, 1982[Web of Science][Medline].

17.   Singh, CB, and Kirk R. The effect of nitrous oxide on middle ear pressure in children during anaesthesia. J Laryngol Otol 93: 349-356, 1979[Web of Science][Medline].

18.   Stenstrom, C, Bylander-Groth A, and Ingvarsson L. Eustachian tube function in otitis-prone and healthy children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 21: 127-138, 1991[Web of Science][Medline].

19.   Takahashi, H, Sugimaru T, Honjo I, Naito Y, Fujita A, Iwahashi S, and Toda H. Assessment of the gas exchange function of the middle ear using nitrous oxide. A preliminary study. Acta Otolaryngol 114: 643-646, 1994[Medline].

20.   Tanabe, M, Takahashi H, Honjo I, and Hasebe S. Gas exchange function of the middle ear in patients with otitis media with effusion. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 254: 453-455, 1997[Medline].


J APPL PHYSIOL 94(1):199-204
8750-7587/03 $5.00 Copyright © 2003 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. E. Kania, P. Herman, P. T. B. Huy, and A. Ar
Role of nitrogen in transmucosal gas exchange rate in the rat middle ear
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2006; 101(5): 1281 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Hohlrieder, C. Keller, J. Brimacombe, S. Eschertzhuber, G. Luckner, I. Abraham, and A. von Goedecke
Middle Ear Pressure Changes During Anesthesia With or Without Nitrous Oxide are Similar Among Airway Devices
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 319 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. N. Ghadiali, J. Banks, and J. D. Swarts
Finite element analysis of active Eustachian tube function
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2004; 97(2): 648 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Banks, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Banks, J. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online