|
|
||||||||
Departments of 1 Surgical and Radiological Sciences and 2 Reproduction and Population Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inhalant
anesthetics may interfere with normal cerebrovascular
autoregulation. It was, therefore, hypothesized that
intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP)
in isoflurane-anesthetized horses would be especially sensitive to body
and head position because of the potential for large hydrostatic
gradients between the brain and heart in this species. Anesthesia was
induced and maintained in six clinically healthy, unmedicated geldings
with 1.57% isoflurane in O2; mechanical ventilation was
used to maintain normocapnia. ICP was measured by using a subarachnoid
strain-gauge transducer. Blood gases and carotid arterial, right
atrial, and airway pressures were also measured. Five body positions
were studied in semirandomized order: dorsal recumbency (DR) with head down (HD), DR with head level (HL), lateral recumbency (LR), sternal recumbency (SR) with HL, and SR with head up (HU). Data were analyzed by using paired t-tests. ICP and CPP values, respectively,
are as follows (means ± SD): 36 ± 4 and 55 ± 18 mmHg
(DR-HD); 34 ± 6 and 51 ± 32 mmHg (DR-HL); 24 ± 5 and
48 ± 4 mmHg (LR); 19 ± 11 and 87 ± 12 mmHg (SR-HL);
and
14 ± 7 and 71 ± 10 mmHg (SR-HU). Significant
differences were found among all positions, except for SR-HL vs. LR.
Significant increases in CPP were observed only in sternal positions.
In conclusion, ICP in isoflurane-anesthetized horses changes inversely
with the brain-to-heart hydrostatic gradient. DR may also cause
increases in ICP, irrespective of head position.
posture; equine
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BODY AND HEAD POSITION DIRECTLY impact the brain-to-heart hydrostatic gradient, which, in turn, can alter intracranial (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressures (CPP), especially in the presence of drugs or diseases that interfere with normal cerebrovascular autoregulation. Depression of the head relative to the heart, for example, has been shown to increase ICP in awake rats (22) and anesthetized rabbits (4), monkeys (11), cats (13), and humans (14); no significant difference in CPP was found in the latter two studies. Conversely, elevation of the head relative to the heart has been shown to consistently decrease ICP during anesthesia in both dogs (8) and humans (12), although variable increases (15), decreases (16, 20, 21), and no change (7, 9) in CPP have all been reported. In addition to head position, ICP can be affected by body posture alone. A study of human neurosurgical patients showed that the supine position was associated with a lower ICP than either the prone or lateral body positions; significant differences in CPP, however, were not observed (2).
Head position has minimal effect on ICP in standing, awake horses (R. J. Brosnan, R. A. LeCouteur, E. P. Steffey, A. Imai, and G. D. Kortz, unpublished observations), presumably because of normal cerebrovascular regulatory mechanisms. Yet mean arterial pressure (MAP) in horses increases with head elevation (19), which may arise from a need to maintain CPP. Because of dose-dependent cardiovascular depression and a tendency to decrease cerebrovascular resistance, inhalant anesthetics may impede normal responses to hydrostatic stress in the horse caused by unnatural positioning of the head and body. As a result of their large size and potential for large hydrostatic gradients, it is predicted that ICP and CPP in the isoflurane-anesthetized horse might, therefore, be especially sensitive to changes in body and head position.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals. Six healthy geldings, consisting of one Holsteiner, one quarter horse, and four Thoroughbreds, were studied. Animals were aged from 3 to 8 yr (mean ± SD: 4.5 ± 1.9 yr) and weighed from 490 to 576 kg (518 ± 37 kg). This protocol was approved by the Animal Use and Care Committee at the University of California, Davis.
Anesthesia. Food, but not water, was withheld 12 h before the experiment. Anesthesia was induced with isoflurane in unmedicated horses by using a procedure that has been previously described (5, 10, 23). Horses were then intubated with a 30-mm cuffed orotracheal tube that was connected to a standard, large-animal, semiclosed anesthetic circuit. For the first hour after induction, end-tidal isoflurane concentration (CETiso) was maintained between 1.7 and 2.0% to provide a surgical plane of anesthesia during instrumentation; no gross or purposeful movement was observed during this time. For the remainder of the experiment, horses were maintained at a constant dose of 1.57% isoflurane, corresponding to 1.2 times the minimum alveolar concentration for this species (24). Respiration was controlled by using intermittent positive-pressure ventilation to maintain normocapnia. Peak-inspiratory and end-expiratory pressures were kept between 18.3 and 23.9 cmH2O (20.8 ± 1.2 cmH2O) and 0.0 to 2.2 cmH2O (1.1 ± 0.6 cmH2O), respectively. Blankets and heat lamps were used as needed to maintain normothermia (37.4 ± 0.6°C).
Body positions. During a single anesthesia, each horse was studied in three body positions on a padded cart in randomized order: left lateral recumbency (LR), dorsal recumbency (DR), and sternal recumbency (SR). During DR, horses were studied with the head measured from the lateral canthus level with the thoracic inlet (DR-HL) and with the head down 20 cm vertically from the thoracic inlet (DR-HD). During SR, horses were studied with the head level with the thoracic inlet (SR-HL) and with the head up 65 cm vertically from the lateral canthus to the thoracic inlet (SR-HU); legs were positioned in front of the animal with both elbows flexed. The order of head position within the DR and SR positions was randomized. Head position was always kept level with the thoracic inlet during LR. After each change in body or head position, steady-state CETiso and end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration were maintained for a minimum of 30 min before data collection.
Instrumentation and data collection. Systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressures were recorded from a percutaneous, 14-gauge, 17.6-cm polytetrafluoroethylene right carotid arterial catheter with the catheter tip at or near the thoracic inlet; mean blood pressure was obtained via an electronic signal mean. A second 6.5-Fr, 110-cm polyethylene catheter was placed percutaneously in the right jugular vein and advanced into the right atrium, as confirmed by pressure waveform tracing, to measure central venous pressure (CVP). Both catheters were connected to calibrated strain-gauge transducers (model P23D, Statham Division of Mark IV Industries, Oxnard, CA) positioned at the level of the thoracic inlet. Airway pressure within the endotracheal tube was measured by a calibrated differential pressure transducer (model PM131TC, Statham Division of Mark IV Industries). Signal output from blood and airway pressure transducers was recorded by a multichannel physiograph (Grass model 7D, Statham Medical Instruments, Hato Rey, PR). Body temperature was measured within the nasopharynx by using a calibrated temperature probe (Yellow Springs Instruments, Yellow Springs, OH). CETiso and end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration were measured by using infrared gas analyzers (LB2, Sensormedics, Aneheim, CA), and inspired O2 fraction was measured by a polarographic oxygen sensor (OM-11, Sensormedics). All machines were calibrated against multiple certified standards. Arterial PO2 (PaO2), arterial PCO2 (PaCO2), and arterial pH were measured by an automated blood-gas analyzer (ABL 5, Radiometer America, Westlake, OH); values were later corrected by using standard curves obtained through tonometry of horse blood with certified standard gas mixtures.
Direct ICP was obtained via a Codman Microsensor strain-gauge transducer (Codman & Shurtleff, Raynham, MA) placed through a right parietal craniotomy into the subarachnoid space (Brosnan et al., unpublished observations). Accuracy of all transducers was verified by post hoc calibration within a column of water from
20 to +30 mmHg.
CPP was calculated as the difference between MAP at the circle of
Willis (MAPCW) and the ICP. In turn, MAPCW was
estimated by the following equations
|
(1) |
|
(2) |
h is the vertical distance (in cm) between
the thoracic inlet (at the jugular vein) and lateral canthus of the
eye, and 1.36 represents the conversion factor between mmHg and
cmH2O.
Statistical analysis.
Because of missing data, screening tests involving repeated measures
could not be performed easily without estimation and replacement of
these values. Instead, paired t-tests were used to determine
significance for a variable between two positions. To protect against
false rejection of the null hypothesis caused by increased numbers of
tests, differences were considered significant only at
P
0.01. Because ICP was hypothesized to be inversely correlated with head elevation within a given body position,
single-tailed t-tests were used between comparisons of DR-HD
vs. DR-HL and SR-HL vs. SR-HU.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cardiorespiratory responses.
Hemodynamic and blood-gas responses are summarized in Table
1; significant group comparisons observed
by using paired t-tests are listed in Table
2. MAP was significantly higher
in SR than in LR; heart rate tended also to be higher in SR, with an
average increase of 4.6 ± 3.5 beats/min in SR-HU compared with
LR. When corrected for changes in hydrostatic pressure,
MAPCW was highest during DR-HD and SR-HL and lowest during
SR-HU. In addition, MAP was significantly increased in SR-HL compared
with LR, despite identical head elevations. No significant changes in
CVP were observed among any positions.
|
|
ICP and CPP.
Individual ICP values ranged from
21 mmHg in SR-HU to +40.3
mmHg in DR-HD. Statistically significant differences (or differences approaching statistical significance) were seen in ICP among all body positions, with the exception of SR-HL vs. LR (Table 2). However,
only statistically significant differences in CPP were seen between SR
and LR, due primarily to group differences in MAPCW, not
ICP (Fig. 1).
|
Statistical testing. Missing data arose from two sources. First, additional body and head positions were added to the study design after the first experiment, for which measurements were, therefore, unavailable. Second, inadequate muscle relaxation present in one horse during SR precluded measurements in the SR-HL position.
A large number of t-tests were performed to avoid estimation of missing data, and
was set at 0.01 to minimize incorrect rejection of null hypotheses (no difference between positions). Since
power was sacrificed for these comparisons, tests designated as
"approaching statistical significance" (0.01 < P
0.05) necessitate cautious interpretation.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In isoflurane-anesthetized horses, ICP changes in accordance
with hydrostatic pressure gradients brought about by changes in head
position, i.e., positive hydrostatic gradients caused by a dependent
head position result in increased ICP, and negative hydrostatic
gradients caused by an elevated head position result in decreased ICP.
However, equidistant elevation or depression of the head with respect
to the thoracic inlet produces dissimilar magnitudes of ICP alteration
in different body positions. A 20-cm lowering of the head from DR-HL to
DR-HD produced a mean ICP change of +3.3 mmHg (4.5 cmH2O),
corresponding to an average increase of 0.16 mmHg (0.22 cmH2O) per centimeter head depression. A 65-cm raising of
the head from SR-HL to SR-HU produced a mean ICP change of
29.2 mmHg
(
39.7 cmH2O), corresponding to an average ICP increase of
0.45 mmHg (0.61 cmH2O) per centimeter head elevation.
Assuming a linear relationship between head position and ICP change,
there exists a threefold greater effect of head elevation on lowering ICP in SR than the effect of head depression on increasing ICP in DR.
In addition, significant differences between DR-HL vs. LR and DR-HL vs.
SR-HL suggest that increases in ICP associated with DR are, at least in
part, independent of head position. Instead, these changes may be
related to changes in abdominal pressure or organ displacement caused
by DR, producing possible cranial displacement of the diaphragm,
increased thoracic pressure, and external compression of the vena cava
(3).
Although unaffected by DR and LR, CPP was significantly increased during SR, principally as a consequence of markedly increased MAP. This hemodynamic change probably occurred less from a need to increase CPP than as a sequela of SR itself, which is associated with an increased risk of postanesthetic myopathies (26) and presumably muscle pain. Hence, increased MAP may signify an autonomic response to a noxious stimulus. Other evidence for this interpretation includes increased heart rate for most horses during SR and insufficient muscle relaxation with purposeful movement present only during SR in one animal, despite a constant end-tidal isoflurane dose. Additionally, blood pressures in this study for horses in LR are significantly higher than those described in the literature for horses anesthetized under similar circumstances (5). This discrepancy may also be due to increased sympathetic tone after SR, body repositioning, direct cerebral stimulation from the pressure transducer, or persistent, subconscious, postsurgical discomfort.
CVP, as measured by right atrial pressure, was similar in all body
positions. Nevertheless, cerebral venous pressures would be very
different if CVP were corrected for the same hydrostatic gradient as
MAPCW. DR-HD would change cerebral venous pressures by +15
mmHg and tend to impede cerebral drainage and increase capillary
pressure. Conversely, SR-HU would change cerebral venous pressures by
48 mmHg, facilitating drainage and causing the jugular vein to act as
a Starling resistor (28); resulting atmospheric or
subatmospheric venous pressures would, therefore, be predicted to have
no differential effect on cerebral blood flow.
All animals were normoxic throughout the study. However, PaO2 was significantly higher (and with less variance) during SR and significantly lower during DR as a result of gravitational effects on pulmonary ventilation-perfusion matching (18); these findings directly confirm similar comparisons in the literature for this species (25, 26) but should not significantly influence cerebral hemodynamics or oxygen delivery in normoxemic animals. Similarly, comparisons of PaCO2 that approached significance (Table 2) were only of a few Torr in magnitude and, at most, contributed only a small portion to the overall differences in ICP.
Isoflurane interferes with normal cerebrovascular autoregulation by causing dose-dependent cerebral vasodilation (1, 17, 27), which increases ICP by increasing cerebral vascular volume as a function of cerebral arterial and cerebral venous pressures. Thus, whereas head position in awake horses does not appear to influence ICP (Brosnan et al., unpublished observations), isoflurane-anesthetized horses do show profound positional effects. Consequently, body position may necessitate even greater consideration in horses anesthetized with higher end-tidal anesthetic concentrations or with concurrent intracranial disease so as to minimize risks of inadequate CPP and cerebral ischemia.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors thank Ramon Cervantes, Vince Long, Richard Morgan, and Linda Tripp for technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This study was supported by a grant from the Marcia MacDonald Rivas Foundation.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. J. Brosnan, Dept. of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616 (E-mail: rjbrosnan{at}ucdavis.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
First published February 15, 2002;10.1152/japplphysiol.00055.2002
Received 22 January 2002; accepted in final form 7 February 2002.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Barini, DJ,
Kassell NF,
Coester HC,
Butler M,
and
Sokoll MD.
Comparison of systemic and cerebrovascular effects of isoflurane and halothane.
Neurosurgery
15:
400-409,
1984[ISI][Medline].
2.
Calliauw, L,
van Aken J,
Rolly G,
and
Verbeke L.
The position of the patient during neurosurgical procedures on the posterior fossa.
Acta Neurochir (Wien)
85:
154-158,
1987[Medline].
3.
Citerio, G,
Vascotto E,
Villa F,
Celotti S,
and
Pesenti A.
Induced abdominal compartment syndrome increases intracranial pressure in neurotrauma patients: a prospective study.
Crit Care Med
29:
1466-1471,
2001[ISI][Medline].
4.
Doi, M,
and
Kawai Y.
Mechanisms of increased intracranial pressure in rabbits exposed to head-down tilt.
Jpn J Physiol
48:
63-69,
1998[Medline].
5.
Dunlop, CI,
Steffey EP,
Miller MF,
and
Woliner MJ.
Temporal effects of halothane and isoflurane in laterally recumbent ventilated male horses.
Am J Vet Res
48:
1250-1255,
1987[Medline].
7.
Durward, QJ,
Amacher AL,
Del Maestro RF,
and
Sibbald WJ.
Cerebral and cardiovascular responses to changes in head elevation in patients with intracranial hypertension.
J Neurosurg
59:
938-944,
1983[Medline].
8.
Ernst, PS,
Albin MS,
and
Bunegin L.
Intracranial and spinal cord hemodynamics in the sitting position in dogs in the presence and absence of increased intracranial pressure.
Anesth Analg
70:
147-153,
1990
9.
Feldman, Z,
Kanter MJ,
Robertson CS,
Contant CF,
Hayes C,
Sheinberg MA,
Villareal CA,
Narayan RK,
and
Grossman RG.
Effect of head elevation on intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and cerebral blood flow in head-injured patients.
J Neurosurg
76:
207-211,
1992[ISI][Medline].
10.
Hodgson, DS,
Steffey EP,
Grandy JL,
and
Woliner MJ.
Effects of spontaneous, assisted, and controlled ventilatory modes in halothane-anesthetized geldings.
Am J Vet Res
47:
992-996,
1986[Medline].
11.
Keil, LC,
McKeever KH,
Skidmore MG,
and
Severs WB.
The effect of head-down tilt and water immersion on intracranial pressure in nonhuman primates.
Aviat Space Environ Med
63:
181-185,
1992[Medline].
12.
Kenning, JA,
Toutant SM,
and
Saunders RL.
Upright patient positioning in the management of intracranial hypertension.
Surg Neurol
15:
148-152,
1981[Medline].
13.
Kotani, J,
Momota Y,
Sugioka S,
Umemura A,
and
Ueda Y.
Effect of head-down tilt on intracranial presure and sagittal sinus pressure during general anesthesia in cats.
Anesth Prog
39:
209-211,
1993[Medline].
14.
Mavrocordatos, P,
Bissonnette B,
and
Ravussin P.
Effects of neck position and head elevation on intracranial pressure in anesthetized neurosurgical patients.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol
12:
10-14,
2000[ISI][Medline].
15.
Meixensberger, J,
Baunach S,
Amschler J,
Dings J,
and
Roosen K.
Influence of body position on tissue-PO2, cerebral perfusion pressure and intracranial pressure in patients with acute brain injury.
Neurol Res
19:
249-253,
1997[Medline].
16.
Moraine, JJ,
Berré J,
and
Mélot C.
Is cerebral perfusion pressure a major determinant of cerebral blood flow during head elevation in comatose patients with severe intracranial lesions?
J Neurosurg
92:
606-614,
2000[Medline].
17.
Newberg, LA,
Milde JH,
and
Michenfelder JD.
The cerebral metabolic effects of isoflurane at and above concentrations that suppress cortical electrical activity.
Anesthesiology
59:
23-28,
1983[ISI][Medline].
18.
Nyman, G,
and
Hedenstierna G.
Ventilation-perfusion relationships in the anesthetized horse.
Equine Vet J
21:
274-281,
1989[Medline].
19.
Parry, BW,
Gay CC,
and
McCarthy MA.
Influence of head height on arterial blood pressure in standing horses.
Am J Vet Res
41:
1626-1631,
1980[Medline]. [Corrigenda. Am J Vet Res 42: December 1981, p. 715.]
20.
Rosner, MJ,
and
Coley IB.
Cereral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure, and head elevation.
J Neurosurg
65:
636-641,
1986[ISI][Medline].
21.
Schneider, GH,
Helden AV,
Franke R,
Lanksch WR,
and
Unterberg A.
Influence of body position on jugular venous oxygen saturation, intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure.
Acta Neurochir
59, Suppl:
107-112,
1993.
22.
Severs, WB,
Morrow BA,
and
Keil LC.
Cerebrospinal fluid pressure in conscious head-down tilted rats.
Aviat Space Environ Med
62:
944-946,
1991[Medline].
23.
Steffey, EP,
and
Howland D, Jr.
Comparison of circulatory and respiratory effects of isoflurane and halothane anesthesia in horses.
Am J Vet Res
41:
821-825,
1980[ISI][Medline].
24.
Steffey, EP,
Howland D, Jr,
Giri S,
and
Eger EI.
Enflurane, halothane and isoflurane potency in horses.
Am J Vet Res
38:
1037-1039,
1977[Medline].
25.
Steffey, EP,
Kelly AB,
Hodgson SD,
Grandy JL,
and
Woliner MJ.
Effect of body posture on cardiopulmonary function in horses during five hours of constant-dose halothane anesthesia.
Am J Vet Res
51:
11-16,
1990[Medline].
26.
Steffey, EP,
Woliner MJ,
and
Dunlop C.
Effects of five hours of constant 1.2 MAC halothane in sternally recumbent, spontaneously breathing horses.
Equine Vet J
22:
433-436,
1990[Medline].
27.
Todd, MM,
and
Drummond JC.
A comparison of the cerebrovascular and metabolic effects of halothane and isoflurane in the cat.
Anesthesiology
60:
276-282,
1984[ISI][Medline].
28.
Toung, TJK,
Aizawa H,
and
Traystman RJ.
Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation on cerebral venous pressure with head elevation in dogs.
J Appl Physiol
88:
655-661,
2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |