Vol. 92, Issue 6, 2256-2263, June 2002
Psychrometric limits and critical evaporative coefficients
for unacclimated men and women
W. Larry
Kenney and
Michael J.
Zeman
Noll Physiological Research Center and the Department of
Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park,
Pennsylvania 16802-6900
 |
ABSTRACT |
Critical environmental limits,
defined as those above which heat balance cannot be maintained for a
given metabolic heat production, have not been determined for
unacclimated subjects. To characterize critical environmental limits
and to derive evaporative heat exchange coefficients
(Ke') for unacclimated young men
(n = 11) and women (n = 10), subjects
of average aerobic fitness walked at 30% maximal aerobic capacity in
an environmental chamber. Critical environmental conditions were
defined as the psychrometric loci of dry-bulb temperature and water
vapor pressure at which core (esophageal) temperature was forced out of
equilibrium (heat gain exceeded heat loss). Compared with the men in
our study, the women had significantly higher critical environmental
limits (P < 0.001) in warm (34-38°C), humid
(>60%) environments, a function of their lower absolute metabolic
heat production at the fixed relative exercise intensity. Isotherms
constructed from biophysical models closely fit the data in this range
of environments but underestimated empirically determined critical
limits in hotter, drier environments. Sex-specific values of
Ke' were derived by partial calorimetry in the
critical water vapor pressure environments, in which full skin
wettedness occurred. There were no sex differences for
Ke' (men = 17.4, 15.5, and 14.2 W · m
2 · Torr
1 and
women = 16.8, 15.5, and 14.2 W · m
2 · Torr
1 at 34, 36, and 38°C, respectively). These Ke'
values were lower than those previously published for fully
heat-acclimated men (18.4 W · m
2 · Torr
1 at 36°C)
and women (17.7 W · m
2 · Torr
1 at 36°C
and 15.5 W · m
2 · Torr
1 at
38°C) and may be used to model heat balance responses for unacclimated men and women working in hot environments.
heat acclimation; sex differences; heat stress; psychrometric
chart; thermoregulation; heat balance; sweat evaporation; core
temperature; heat exchange
 |
INTRODUCTION |
OVER A WIDE RANGE OF
ENVIRONMENTS, body core temperature (Tc) equilibrates
at levels proportional to metabolic rate and independent of ambient
conditions (21, 26). Thermal environments above this
designated "prescriptive zone" (18, 19) force
Tc out of equilibrium, resulting in a continuous rise in
Tc. Critical conditions that define the upper limit of the
prescriptive zone for a given metabolic heat production have been
determined for heat-acclimated men (3) and women
(13, 14) but not for unacclimated subjects, in part
because of perceived methodological concerns.
Belding and Kamon (3) originally used a time-intensive
protocol to determine critical ambient vapor pressures at 36°C for a
variety of exercise intensities and air movements. A shorter version of
their original investigation was proposed (13) and then
refined (16) to minimize the number and duration of tests necessary to determine these limits. However, these more time-efficient protocols require the ability to systematically change ambient temperature or water vapor pressure, i.e., with the use of a fairly sophisticated environmental chamber.
In addition to setting environmental limits, physiological responses
can be used to determine the effective evaporative coefficient (Ke') at each critical limit based on the
assumption that, at those critical limits with high humidity, heat gain
equals heat loss and the skin is fully wet. That is,
Mnet ± (R + C) = Emax, where
Mnet is the net metabolic heat production,
R + C is the combined dry heat gain or loss
through radiation and convection, and Emax is
the maximal ambient capacity for evaporative cooling. Because
Emax = Ke' · v0.6 · (Ps,sk
Pa), where v is air velocity and
(Ps,sk
Pa) is the vapor pressure
gradient from fully wetted skin to air, Ke' can be derived and used to model heat exchange with the environment and
predict limits for prolonged work-heat exposures. Although some
assumptions are required for this sequence of calculations, the
resultant values are useful for continuing efforts to model human heat
exchange with the environment.
The present study used two innovations of the Kamon and Avellini
(13) protocol. In hot dry environments, critical limits are determined by individual sweating capacity as opposed to
environmental limits (13), and these limits approach a
vertical line on the psychrometric chart, i.e., an isotherm of free
evaporation (17). To better predict the dry-bulb
temperature (Tdb) locus of this line, we held ambient water
vapor pressure (Pa) constant and determined a
critical Tdb at three separate Pa values.
Second, in experiments in which Tc did not achieve a true
steady state (which occurs more commonly in unacclimated than in fully
heat-acclimated subjects), we calculated the heat storage
(S) associated with this "pseudo-steady state" and
incorporated S into the heat balance calculations, which led
to the derivation of Ke', i.e.,
Mnet ± (R + C) ± S = Emax.
The purpose of the present investigation was to determine for the first
time the critical environmental limits for unacclimated men and women.
In addition, partial calorimetry was used to determine sex-specific
values for Ke'. It was hypothesized that
1) critical environments for unacclimated men and women
would be shifted downward [toward lower critical water vapor pressure
(Pcrit)] and leftward [toward lower critical temperature
(Tcrit)] on a psychrometric chart compared with
heat-acclimated subjects because of lower sweating rates, altered sweat
distribution, and lower evaporative efficiency; 2) these
empirically determined psychrometric limits would fit standard
biophysical models of heat exchange; and 3) the derived
critical Ke' would be lower for unacclimated
subjects than previously published values (3, 13) for
fully heat-acclimated subjects.
 |
METHODS |
Subjects.
All experimental procedures were approved in advance by the
Institutional Review Board at The Pennsylvania State University. After
all aspects of the experiment were explained, oral and written informed
consent was obtained. Each subject was subsequently approved for the
experiment after each completed a medical screening examination. Twenty-one subjects were tested (11 men and 10 women). All subjects were healthy, normotensive, nonsmokers, and not taking any medications that might affect the physiological variables of interest in this study. None of the women was taking oral contraceptives, and no attempt
was made to control for menstrual status. Subjects with a maximal
aerobic capacity (
O2 max) in the upper
or lower 20th percentile for their gender and age (1) were
excluded. None of the subjects was physically active outdoors on a
regular basis.
O2 max was determined
with the use of open-circuit spirometry during a maximal graded
exercise test performed on a motor-driven treadmill. Subject
characteristics are shown in Table 1.
During the experiments, subjects wore thin, short-sleeved cotton
tee-shirts, shorts, socks, and walking/running shoes. For consistency
with previous studies that have used this minimal clothing ensemble, no
clothing corrections were made for this "semi-nude" state
(13).
Chamber characteristics.
The environmental chamber used for this study utilized a three-mode
controller (proportional, derivative, and integral) to optimize
stability and response. Air is vertically discharged in an even pattern
through the ceiling and returned through base molding on three sides.
Because air returns behind the walls, wall temperature increases
linearly with air temperature. The ceiling was mapped for optimal
laminar flow. With no forced air movement in the chamber, velocity in
the vicinity of the walking subjects was measured at 0.45 m/s. The same
chamber was used in the studies by Kamon and colleagues (9, 13,
14), from which comparative data are presented later in this paper.
Testing procedures.
Subjects were asked to refrain from vigorous exercise and alcohol
consumption during the 24 h before each experiment and from caffeine on the day of the experiment. On arrival, each subject was
weighed and donned a Polar heart rate (HR) monitor. The esophageal probe was inserted as the subject drank 5 ml of room temperature water
per kilogram body weight. The subject then moved into the preconditioned environmental chamber for equilibration, and skin thermocouples were attached.
Two sets of protocols were used to determine either 1) the
Pcrit for the upward inflection of esophageal temperature
(Tes) at three distinct Tdb values (34, 36, and
38°C) or 2) the critical Tdb
(Tcrit) at three distinct Pa values (12, 16, and 20 Torr). The methods used to determine Pcrit and
Tcrit have been previously described (13, 14,
16). Experiments were conducted year-round in randomized order
to counterbalance any possible acclimation effects, and no attempt was
made to heat acclimate subjects. Each subject participated in all six
trials, with at least 2 days separating successive tests.
Each experiment was conducted in a programmable environmental chamber.
Tdb and wet-bulb temperature (Twb) were
measured every 5 min with the use of precision mercury-in-glass
thermometers (traceable standards provided by the National Institute
of Standards and Technology) mounted in an ASHRAE box (American Society
of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-conditioning Engineers).
Pa was determined from Tdb and Twb
with the use of a standard psychrometric chart.
During the three Tcrit experiments, Pa was held
constant and Tdb was systematically increased ~1°C
every 5 min after a 30-min equilibration period at 28°C. In the three
Pcrit experiments, Tdb was held constant while
Pa was increased ~1 Torr every 5 min after a 30-min
equilibration period at 9 Torr.
During each test, the subjects walked continuously on a motor-driven
treadmill for up to 2.5 h at a speed and grade that approximated 30% of their
O2 max. This exercise
intensity was chosen for three reasons: 1) it reasonably
simulates light-to-moderate daily workloads typical of a healthy,
normally active population, 2) it is the intensity
associated with an 8-h work day in industrial settings
(5), and 3) it reflects the intensity for many
self-paced activities. After the 30-min equilibration period, either
the Tdb (Tcrit tests) or the Pa
(Pcrit tests) in the chamber was increased in a step-wise
fashion while chamber Tdb and Twb and subject
Tes, skin temperature (Tsk), and HR were
monitored. To ensure that each subject was walking at the prescribed
workload, oxygen uptake (
O2) was
determined after 30 min with a 3-min expired air sample collected
in Douglas bags and analyzed for CO2 concentration (Beckman LB-2, Fullerton, CA), O2 concentration (S-3A oxygen
analyzer, Applied Electrochemistry, Sunnyvale, CA), and volume
(Parkinson-Cowen dry-gas meter, Cambridge, UK).
Measurements.
Tes was measured with a probe made from a thermistor sealed
in a pediatric feeding tube. The probe was inserted nasally and lowered
in the esophagus to the level of the left atrium, ~0.25 of the
subject's standing height. Tsk was measured at four sites: leg (Tleg), thigh (Tth), arm
(Tarm), and chest (Tch) with copper-constantan thermocouples. A weighted mean Tsk (in °C) was calculated
(25) as
|
(1)
|
Tes and Tsk were continuously recorded,
and HR was recorded at 5-min intervals on a dedicated computer.
Sweating rate was determined from the loss of nude weight,
adjusted for water intake on a scale accurate to ±20 g. Respiratory losses were considered negligible. Fluid intake was prohibited between
the initial nude weight and the final nude weight. The skin evaporative
capacity (Esk) for each test was calculated by multiplying the sweating rate by 0.68 W · h · g
1, the specific heat of vaporization.
Determination of Tcrit and Pcrit.
An example of the time course of Tes, Tsk, and
environmental conditions for a typical Pcrit test is shown
in Fig. 1. Typically, Tes
began to plateau by about minute 40 and remained at an
elevated steady state as Pa was increased 1 Torr per 5 min.
The critical Tdb or Pa was defined by the
subsequent upward inflection of Tes. The inflection point
was selected graphically from the raw data (see Fig. 1). A line was
drawn between the data points, starting at the 30th min. When the mean
slope of the Tes line began to deviate upward from the
equilibrium phase slope, a second line was drawn from the point of
departure of Tes from the first line. The Tdb
or Pa 1 min before the point at which the second line departed from the first was defined as the Tcrit or
Pcrit, respectively. To confirm graphical representation of
the upward inflection of Tes, the slopes were redrawn with
different time axes, including logarithmic scales. The upward rise in
Tes was typically preceded by an inflection point in the HR
time course (13-15) and thus could be anticipated
during the test.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Data from a representative critical water vapor pressure
(Pcrit) test. Dry-bulb temperature (Tdb) is
held constant in this case at 34°C while ambient water vapor pressure
(Pa) is systematically increased after a 30-min
equilibration period. Esophageal temperature (Tes) of the
subject rises to a steady state, dependent on exercise intensity and
independent of ambient conditions. After a critical environment is
reached, Tes again begins to rise. The Pa at
which this inflection is seen is designated the Pcrit,
which was 27 Torr in this example. The final rise in Tes is
preceded by a steady increase in mean skin temperature
(Tsk).
|
|
In heat-acclimated subjects, Tes typically equilibrates as
a relatively horizontal line before the upward inflection forced by the
changing environmental conditions (13-15). However,
in the unacclimated subjects tested here, Tes often
increased gradually before its upward inflection. This occurred in 55 of the 126 experiments. Such a slow rise was considered a
"pseudo-steady state" as long as a clear, definitive upward
Tes inflection eventually deviated from this slowly rising
slope (13). The difference between the slope of this
slow-rising Tes and a zero-slope time course of Tes constituted positive heat storage (+S). To
be consistent, in the few (<10) subjects who displayed slightly
negative sloping "steady states," negative heat storage
(
S) was calculated and S was subsequently
incorporated into heat balance calculations designed to determine
Ke'.
To test the reliability of the Tcrit and Pcrit
data, four individual tests were repeated on a different day. These
four repeat experiments were selected to cover the range of
environments inherent in this study, i.e., they ranged from the driest
to the most humid environment. Because the dependent variable in each
case is an x,y locus on a psychrometric chart,
typical test-retest statistics would add a third dimension. For this
reason, to calculate a test-retest correlation, the time points at
which each critical point was achieved were compared. When inflection
times were compared between the initial tests and the repeated tests, a
correlation coefficient (r) of 0.97 resulted, with a slope
of 1.02 and an intercept of
1.11.
Calculation of critical Ke'.
All calculations below were performed uniformly across subjects.
Metabolic rate (M; W/m2) was derived from the
O2 (l/min) and respiratory exchange
ratio (RER; unitless) as
|
(2)
|
where AD is Dubois surface area (m2).
External work (W; W/m2) was calculated as
|
(3)
|
where mb is body mass (kg),
vw is walking velocity (m/min), and fg is
fractional grade of the treadmill. Mnet was then
calculated as M
W.
Dry heat exchange via radiation and convection
(W/m2) was determined as
|
(4)
|
where hr+c
(W · m
2 · °C
1) is the
combined radiative and convective heat transfer coefficient and
Tdb
Tsk represents the temperature
gradient between the ambient air and the skin. In this study,
hr+c was determined for each subject by using the formula
|
(5)
|
where 6.5 · (treadmill speed; m/s)0.39 is
the convective coefficient for treadmill walking directly determined by
Nishi and Gagge (22) and 4.7 is the radiative coefficient
for indoor environments.
Where appropriate, S (W/m2) was
calculated as
|
(6)
|
where 0.97 W · h · kg
1 · °C
1
is the specific heat of the body and
Tb represents the
change in mean body temperature measured over the time period
(
t, h) between 30 min and the time at which the critical
Tes inflection point was observed. The equation for
Tb (°C), which is a function of the change in both
Tes and Tsk, was
|
(7)
|
Maximal evaporative capacity of the environment
(Emax; W/m2) was calculated as
|
(8)
|
where v (m · s
1) was equal to
0.45 for this study.
At each critical environmental condition, the evaporative
cooling required to maintain thermal balance
(Ereq) equals Emax, i.e.
|
(9)
|
and the heat balance equation can be solved for
Ke'. This solution assumes a fully wetted skin
surface, a requirement that, as expected, was met only in the
Pcrit tests (see DISCUSSION).
Isothermal lines were constructed on a psychrometric chart from
mean group data following the procedures described by Kerslake (17) and Hatch (11) and with the
Tsk and the mean
Ke' · v0.6 values
determined in the present study. The portion of the isotherm for fully
wet skin was constructed by using a psychrometric anchor point with
locus Tdb = Tsk
(Esk/Mnet),
Pa = Ps,sk. The slope of the line (
)
was
hr+c/(Ke' · v0.6).
The curved portion of the isotherm at higher Tdb values and lower Pa values was constructed by calculating the
Tdb for free evaporation (using the highest mean
evaporative rate for each group) and constructing a curve according to
Kerslake (17), where the Tdb for free
evaporation = Tdb + (Esk
Mnet)/hr+c. In each case, this
assumed that the mean sweating rate for the full exposure time
represented the sweating rate at the critical Tc
inflection. As shown subsequently by the data collected, this was not
the case, especially for the women.
Statistical analysis.
Variables that changed throughout conditions were analyzed with an
analysis of covariance with repeated measures. A SAS program was
written by using the PROC MIXED statement, with independent variables
of sex and the fixed critical condition; the dependent variable was the
unknown critical environmental parameter. A one-way analysis of
variance was used to compare subject characteristics and variables
calculated once per trial, e.g., Mnet,
(R + C), sweating rate,
Ke', and so forth. Where significant
F values were found, Tukey's follow-up tests were
performed. Differences were considered significant at the 0.05 level.
 |
RESULTS |
Subjects for this study were recruited to be representative of the
population with respect to body size, adiposity, and aerobic fitness.
Thus the women were shorter, weighed less, and had a higher percent
body fat and a lower body surface area than the men (all at
P < 0.05; Table 1). Body fatness ranged from 11 to 26% for the men and from 16 to 29% for the women. With respect to
body mass index, the men ranged from the 18th to the 71st percentile for their age group, whereas the women ranged from the 24th to the 87th
percentile (1). The women also had a 13-14% lower
O2 max, which translated to a
significantly lower M, Mnet (139 ± 3 vs. 191 ± 6 W/m2, P < 0.001)
and Ereq during exercise at 30%
O2 max (Table 2) in each critical environment. The
measured exercise intensity ranged from 29.9 ± 1.1 to 32.3 ± 1.0%
O2 max for the men and from
28.3 ± 0.9 to 30.0 ± 1.0%
O2 max for the women across trials
(P > 0.05). Mean sweating rate was consistently and
significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the women, as was
the Esk of the sweat produced (Table 2).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2.
Sweating rate and calculated heat balance variables for unacclimated
men and women in each critical environment
|
|
Table 3 presents the Tdb and
Pa psychrometric locus values for each critical
environment as well as the mean Ps,sk
Pa. In the tests conducted at Tdb = 34, 36, and 38°C (coinciding with the more humid environments), each
respective Pcrit was significantly higher and each
Ps,sk
Pa was significantly lower for
the women (P < 0.05). No significant sex differences
were seen in the critical Ps,sk
Pa for
the tests at fixed low ambient vapor pressures. These critical
environmental loci are plotted on a standard psychrometric chart in
Fig. 2.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
A
standard psychrometric chart showing the mean Pcrit and
values determined empirically for 11 unacclimated men
( ) and 10 unacclimated women ( ).
Pcrit values were significantly higher for the women in the
humid conditions because of their lower absolute heat production at
30% maximal aerobic capacity
( O2 max), whereas no differences were
seen in drier environments (see text for full explanation). The dotted
arrowheads point to separate biophysical anchor points with coordinates
[Tdb = Tsk (Esk/Mnet),
Pa = Ps,sk] and have a calculated slope
( ) = hr+c/Ke' · v0.6,
where Esk is skin evaporative capacity,
Mnet is net metabolic heat production,
Ps,sk is vapor pressure gradient, hr+c is the
combined radiative and convective heat transfer coefficient,
Ke' is the critical evaporative coefficient, and
v is air velocity. Data fit the calculated relation for both the men
and the women. On the other hand, the dotted isotherms curving toward a
limit for free evaporation at Tdb values above 40°C were
significantly lower than the experimental data. These curves transition
from full wettedness (w 1) to free evaporation (w = 0) and
are a function of Tsk and Esk. rh,
Relative humidity.
|
|
Also shown in Fig. 2 are calculated isothermal lines from previously
published biophysical models of heat exchange as described in
METHODS. The arrowheads in Fig. 2 extrapolate to two
separately calculated biophysical anchor points [Tdb = Tsk
(Esk/Mnet), Pa = Ps,sk], and the lines have slopes of

= hr+c/Ke' · v0.6.
The curved portion of the isotherms at higher Tdb and lower Pa values reflect progressive changes in skin wettedness
approaching the Tdb for free evaporation, a vertical line
at Tdb + (Esk
Mnet)/hr+c. These lines of free
evaporation were calculated from the highest mean sweating rate for
each group, as was done by Kamon and Avellini
(13), and are presented for illustrative purposes.
Each subject would have his or her own line based on Esk. It is obvious that the isotherms
fit the data well at high humidities but underpredict the empirical
data in the hotter, drier environments.
Derived Ke' values are listed for men and
women in Table 2. There were no sex differences for
Ke' (men = 17.4, 15.5, and 14.2 W · m
2 · Torr
1 and women = 16.8, 15.5, and 14.2 W · m
2 · Torr
1
at 34, 36, and 38°C, respectively). These
Ke' values were lower than those previously
published for fully heat-acclimated men (18.4 W · m
2 · Torr
1 at 36°C)
(3) and women (17.7 W · m
2 · Torr
1 at 36°C and 15.5 W · m
2 · Torr
1 at 38°C)
(13). No Ke' values are
presented for the Tcrit tests, since the requirement
that the skin be fully wet was not met (see DISCUSSION).
Further proof is given by the estimated skin wettedness values (w = Esk/Emax) provided in
Table 2. In the humid environments, the estimated skin wettedness value
exceeds 1.0 by 30-50%, suggesting dripped sweat, whereas this
value is <1.0 for the three less humid environments.
Figure 3 shows the critical
environments for the unacclimated young women in the present study
along with data from a group of heat-acclimated women tested by Kamon
and Avellini (13). We believe that this comparison is
justified because 1) these data were collected in the same
environmental chamber used in our laboratory and 2) the
heat-acclimated women were similar in terms of anthropometry, exercised
at a similar metabolic rate (150 ± 5 W/m), and were semi-nude, as
in our study. Although the psychrometric limits are similar at higher
Pa values, the prescriptive zone for the unacclimated women
is contracted as Tdb increases and Pa
decreases, i.e., as environments become less humid.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Data from the young women tested in the present study
( and solid line) are contrasted with data from a group
of fully acclimated women previously tested in our laboratory
( and dashed line). Although the psychrometric limits
are similar at higher Pa values, the prescriptive zone for
the unacclimated women is contracted as Tdb increases and
Pa decreases, i.e., as environments become less humid. This
illustrates that the advantages conveyed by improved sweat evaporation
after rigorous heat acclimation are most prominent in environments that
allow free evaporation of sweat.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The objective of the present study was to determine, for
unacclimated subjects, the range of hot ambient environments beyond which Tc would not equilibrate at a level set by exercise
intensity. The protocol used was a modification of that developed by
Belding and Kamon (3) and refined by Kamon and Avellini
(13) and then again refined by Kenney (15,
16). The underlying basis was to empirically determine a family
of ambient conditions under which Mnet ± (R + C) = Emax.
At full skin wettedness, Emax = Ke' · v0.6 · (Ps,sk
Pa) and Ke' can be derived by
solving the heat balance equations involved. Before this investigation,
this approach had only been used for fully heat-acclimatized men and
women (3, 13, 14).
Potential limitations.
The approach utilized in the present paper is built on heat balance
calculations that, although theoretically sound, are based on numerous
previous investigations, each of which made unique assumptions.
Coefficients and calculations chosen for this investigation in some
cases followed the previous studies of Kamon and colleagues (3,
13) so that comparisons could be made more directly between the
studies. Some coefficients were directly determined, i.e., by
naphthalene sublimation (22), whereas others were based on indirect calculations from empirical data. With the exception of Kamon
and colleagues (13, 14), subjects in those previous studies were predominantly men.
Psychrometric limits.
When Tdb is close to Tsk, dry heat transfer is
minimal and heat exposure at a given metabolic rate is limited by the
vapor pressure gradient, Ps,sk
Pa. In
such environments, one would predict that higher sweating rates
typically exhibited by men (2, 4, 6-8, 10, 12, 20,
24) would not be beneficial and that critical limits would be
similar between unmatched men and women. Under hotter, drier ambient
environments where (R + C) is positive and
Emax is high, the limit to prolonged exposure is
defined by sweating capacity; men, who typically have higher maximal
sweating rates, should have an advantage in these environments. However, such was not the case in this experiment.
As shown in Fig. 2, separate limit lines were observed for the men and
women at Tdb = 34-38°C, with the women's
limits occurring at higher ambient vapor pressures. This was solely due
to the women's lower exercise intensity (18, 19) and
corresponding metabolic heat production, as opposed to a true sex
difference. We chose a relative exercise intensity of 30%
O2 max because 1) it
reasonably simulates light-to-moderate daily workloads typical of a
healthy, normally active population, 2) it is the intensity
associated with an 8-h work day in industrial settings (5), and 3) it reflects the intensity for many
self-paced activities. Furthermore, physiological strain during
exercise in the heat is primarily a function of relative intensity. For
these reasons, such a choice made sense to satisfy the practical
aspects of the study. However, because average (e.g., 50th percentile)
men and women differ in
O2 max, our
subjects exercised at different absolute intensities that resulted in
differing Mnet values.
Within each group, the empirically derived limits in this temperature
range fit well with biophysical models published by others (11,
17, 23). In Fig. 2, the depicted dotted arrows point to
biophysical anchor points with coordinates [Tdb = Tsk
(Esk/Mnet),
Pa = Ps,sk] and have a calculated slope
of 
= hr+c/Ke' · v0.6.
Data fit the calculated relationship for both the men and the women,
supporting the fact that the skin was fully wet and adding credibility
to the psychrometric limits. On the other hand, the limit lines
calculated for free evaporation at Tdb values above 40°C
were significantly lower than the experimental data. These curves
(shown in Fig. 2) show a gradual curvilinear transition from full
wettedness (w
1) to free evaporation (w = 0) and are a
function of Tsk and Esk. In reality,
different individuals would have different limits for free evaporations
and thus different vertical limit lines, extending to the right as far
as the individual sweat capacity will allow it to go until wettedness
drops below 1. The single line drawn in Fig. 2 reflects the highest
mean sweating rate for each group.
As argued by Kamon and Avellini (13), the most obvious
explanation for the lack of fit of the empirically derived data in hot,
dry environments is our use of total sweating rate for the full 1.5- to
2.5-h exposures as representative of the sweating rate at each
Tcrit. The experimental protocol prohibits measurement of
the true sweating rate at the time each critical environment is
reached. Our calculated sweating rate, an average over a long time
period (including time spent in less stressful environments early in
the exposures and during the transients), likely underpredicts the true
sweating rate in the critical environment. If so, the relatively larger
overestimate in the unacclimated women might be expected on the basis
of the known sluggish onset of sweating (4, 6, 7, 10) and
lower sweating rates (2, 4, 6-8, 10, 12, 20,
24) of unacclimated women. It is important to note that such
sweating differences are minimized or disappear altogether when
women are acclimated and appropriately matched with their male
counterparts (e.g., Ref. 9).
As explained in RESULTS, we were able to compare our data
with data collected from a group of fully heat-acclimated women tested
~25 yr ago in the same laboratory. The comparison, shown in Fig. 3,
clearly elucidates the thermoregulatory advantage imparted by heat
acclimation in terms of thermal tolerance. A key adaptation of heat
acclimation is a higher sweating rate for any given exercise intensity.
Such an increase in sweating would only be advantageous in environments
in which ambient Pa is low enough to permit high evaporative rates. In addition, heat-acclimated subjects have a more
uniform sweat distribution over the skin surface, which increases
evaporative efficiency. These advantages are shown by the flatter
slope and higher values of the psychrometric limit line at
Tdb values above 40°C in heat-acclimated subjects,
delimiting a larger range of environments comprising the prescriptive zone.
Evaporative coefficients.
As shown in Table 2, Ke' values at
Tdb = 34-38°C were not significantly different
between men and women. Calculation of Ke' requires conditions of fully wet skin, and thus only the
Ke' values calculated in the more humid
environments are meaningful. In the dry environments, the use of
Ps,sk when the skin was not fully saturated would result in
an overestimate of Emax and an artificially low
Ke'. As in previous studies,
Ke' decreases slightly with increasing Tdb and decreasing Pa within this
temperature range. The values of Ke' for
unacclimated men (17.4, 15.5, and 14.2 W · m
2 · Torr
1) and women (16.8, 15.5, and 14.2 W · m
2 · Torr
1 ) at
34, 36, or 38°C, respectively, were lower than those previously published for fully heat-acclimated men (18.4 W · m
2 · Torr
1 at 36°C)
(3) and women (17.7 W · m
2 · Torr
1 at 36°C and 15.5 W · m
2 · Torr
1 at
38°C) (13). These values are more appropriate for future models of heat transfer between humans and the environment when heat
acclimation is absent.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Jane Pierzga for technical expertise and assistance with
data collection and Dr. Mosuk Chow for statistical advice and contributions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants
R01-AG-07004 and M01-RR-10732.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence:
W. L. Kenney, Noll Physiological Research Center and the
Dept. of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA
16802-6900 (E-mail: w7k{at}psu.edu).
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
First published February 8, 2002;10.1152/japplphysiol.01040.2001
Received 12 October 2001; accepted in final form 20 January 2002.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
ACSM.
ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (5th ed.), edited by Kenney WL.. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1995.
2.
Anderson, GS,
Ward R,
and
Mekjavic IB.
Gender differences in physiological reactions to thermal stress.
Eur J Appl Physiol
71:
95-101,
1995.
3.
Belding, HS,
and
Kamon E.
Evaporative coefficients for prediction of safe limits in prolonged exposures to work under hot conditions.
Fed Proc
32:
1598-1601,
1973.
4.
Bittel, J,
and
Henane R.
Comparison of thermal exchanges in men and women under neutral and hot conditions.
J Physiol
250:
475-489,
1975.
5.
Bonjer, FH.
Actual energy expenditure in relation to the physical working capacity.
Ergonomics
5:
29-31,
1962.
6.
Cunningham, DJ,
Stolwijk JAJ,
and
Wenger CB.
Comparative thermoregulatory responses of resting men and women.
J Appl Physiol
45:
908-915,
1978.
7.
Fox, RH,
and
Lofstedt BA.
A comparison of thermoregulatory function in men and women.
J Physiol
197:
44P-45P,
1968.
8.
Fox, RH,
Lofstedt BE,
Woodward PM,
Eriksson E,
and
Werkstrom B.
Comparison of thermoregulatory function in men and women.
J Appl Physiol
26:
444-453,
1969.
9.
Frye, AJ,
and
Kamon E.
Responses to dry heat of men and women with similar aerobic capacities.
J Appl Physiol
50:
65-70,
1981.
10.
Grucza, R,
Lecroart JL,
Hauser JJ,
and
Houdas Y.
Dynamics of sweating in men and women during passive heating.
Eur J Appl Physiol
54:
309-314,
1985.
11.
Hatch, T.
Assessment of heat stress.
In: Temperature: Its Measurement and Control in Science and Industry, edited by Hardy JD.. New York: Kreiger, 1963, p. 307-318.
12.
Horstman, DH,
and
Christensen E.
Acclimatization to dry heat: active men vs. active women.
J Appl Physiol
52:
825-831,
1982.
13.
Kamon, E,
and
Avellini BA.
Physiological limits to work in the heat and evaporative coefficient for women.
J Appl Physiol
41:
71-76,
1976.
14.
Kamon, E,
Avellini BA,
and
Krajewski J.
Physiological and biophysical limits to work in the heat for clothed men and women.
J Appl Physiol
44:
908-925,
1978.
15.
Kenney, WL,
Lewis DA,
Armstrong CG,
Hyde DE,
Dyksterhouse TS,
Fowler SR,
and
Williams DA.
Critical environmental limits to prolonged work in various clothing ensembles.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J
49:
390-395,
1988.
16.
Kenney, WL,
Mikita DJ,
Havenith G,
Puhl SM,
and
Crosby P.
Simultaneous derivation of clothing-specific heat exchange coefficients.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
25:
283-289,
1993.
17.
Kerslake, DM.
The Stresses of Hot Environments. London: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1972.
18.
Lind, AR.
A physiological criterion for setting thermal environmental limits for everyday work.
J Appl Physiol
18:
51-56,
1963.
19.
Lind, AR.
Prediction of safe limits for occupational exposure to heat.
Fed Proc
32:
1602-1606,
1973.
20.
Morimoto, T,
Slabochova Z,
Naman RK,
and
Sargent F II.
Sex differences in physiological reactions to thermal stress.
J Appl Physiol
22:
526-532,
1967.
21.
Nielsen, M.
Die regulation der korpertemperatur bei muskelarbeit.
Scand Arch Physiol
79:
193-230,
1938.
22.
Nishi, Y,
and
Gagge AP.
Direct evaluation of convective heat transfer coefficient by naphthalene sublimation.
J Appl Physiol
29:
830-838,
1970.
23.
Nishi, Y,
and
Gagge AP.
A psychrometric chart for graphical prediction of thermal comfort and heat tolerance.
ASHRAE Trans
80:
115-130,
1974.
24.
Paolone, AM,
Wells CL,
and
Kelly GT.
Sexual variations in thermoregulation during heat stress.
Aviat Space Environ Med
49:
715-719,
1978.
25.
Ramanthan, NL.
A new weighting system for mean surface temperature of the human body.
J Appl Physiol
19:
531-533,
1964.
26.
Saltin, B,
and
Hermansen L.
Esophageal, rectal, and muscle temperature during exercise.
J Appl Physiol
21:
1757-1762,
1966.
J APPL PHYSIOL 92(6):2256-2263
8750-7587/02 $5.00
Copyright © 2002 the American Physiological Society