Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 92: 2256-2263, 2002. First published February 8, 2002; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01040.2001
8750-7587/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/6/2256    most recent
01040.2001v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kenney, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Zeman, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kenney, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Zeman, M. J.
Vol. 92, Issue 6, 2256-2263, June 2002

Psychrometric limits and critical evaporative coefficients for unacclimated men and women

W. Larry Kenney and Michael J. Zeman

Noll Physiological Research Center and the Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-6900


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Critical environmental limits, defined as those above which heat balance cannot be maintained for a given metabolic heat production, have not been determined for unacclimated subjects. To characterize critical environmental limits and to derive evaporative heat exchange coefficients (Ke') for unacclimated young men (n = 11) and women (n = 10), subjects of average aerobic fitness walked at 30% maximal aerobic capacity in an environmental chamber. Critical environmental conditions were defined as the psychrometric loci of dry-bulb temperature and water vapor pressure at which core (esophageal) temperature was forced out of equilibrium (heat gain exceeded heat loss). Compared with the men in our study, the women had significantly higher critical environmental limits (P < 0.001) in warm (34-38°C), humid (>60%) environments, a function of their lower absolute metabolic heat production at the fixed relative exercise intensity. Isotherms constructed from biophysical models closely fit the data in this range of environments but underestimated empirically determined critical limits in hotter, drier environments. Sex-specific values of Ke' were derived by partial calorimetry in the critical water vapor pressure environments, in which full skin wettedness occurred. There were no sex differences for Ke' (men = 17.4, 15.5, and 14.2 W · m-2 · Torr-1 and women = 16.8, 15.5, and 14.2 W · m-2 · Torr-1 at 34, 36, and 38°C, respectively). These Ke' values were lower than those previously published for fully heat-acclimated men (18.4 W · m-2 · Torr-1 at 36°C) and women (17.7 W · m-2 · Torr-1 at 36°C and 15.5 W · m-2 · Torr-1 at 38°C) and may be used to model heat balance responses for unacclimated men and women working in hot environments.

heat acclimation; sex differences; heat stress; psychrometric chart; thermoregulation; heat balance; sweat evaporation; core temperature; heat exchange


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

OVER A WIDE RANGE OF ENVIRONMENTS, body core temperature (Tc) equilibrates at levels proportional to metabolic rate and independent of ambient conditions (21, 26). Thermal environments above this designated "prescriptive zone" (18, 19) force Tc out of equilibrium, resulting in a continuous rise in Tc. Critical conditions that define the upper limit of the prescriptive zone for a given metabolic heat production have been determined for heat-acclimated men (3) and women (13, 14) but not for unacclimated subjects, in part because of perceived methodological concerns.

Belding and Kamon (3) originally used a time-intensive protocol to determine critical ambient vapor pressures at 36°C for a variety of exercise intensities and air movements. A shorter version of their original investigation was proposed (13) and then refined (16) to minimize the number and duration of tests necessary to determine these limits. However, these more time-efficient protocols require the ability to systematically change ambient temperature or water vapor pressure, i.e., with the use of a fairly sophisticated environmental chamber.

In addition to setting environmental limits, physiological responses can be used to determine the effective evaporative coefficient (Ke') at each critical limit based on the assumption that, at those critical limits with high humidity, heat gain equals heat loss and the skin is fully wet. That is, Mnet ± (R + C) = Emax, where Mnet is the net metabolic heat production, R + C is the combined dry heat gain or loss through radiation and convection, and Emax is the maximal ambient capacity for evaporative cooling. Because Emax = Ke' · v0.6 · (Ps,sk - Pa), where v is air velocity and (Ps,sk - Pa) is the vapor pressure gradient from fully wetted skin to air, Ke' can be derived and used to model heat exchange with the environment and predict limits for prolonged work-heat exposures. Although some assumptions are required for this sequence of calculations, the resultant values are useful for continuing efforts to model human heat exchange with the environment.

The present study used two innovations of the Kamon and Avellini (13) protocol. In hot dry environments, critical limits are determined by individual sweating capacity as opposed to environmental limits (13), and these limits approach a vertical line on the psychrometric chart, i.e., an isotherm of free evaporation (17). To better predict the dry-bulb temperature (Tdb) locus of this line, we held ambient water vapor pressure (Pa) constant and determined a critical Tdb at three separate Pa values. Second, in experiments in which Tc did not achieve a true steady state (which occurs more commonly in unacclimated than in fully heat-acclimated subjects), we calculated the heat storage (S) associated with this "pseudo-steady state" and incorporated S into the heat balance calculations, which led to the derivation of Ke', i.e., Mnet ± (R + C) ± S = Emax.

The purpose of the present investigation was to determine for the first time the critical environmental limits for unacclimated men and women. In addition, partial calorimetry was used to determine sex-specific values for Ke'. It was hypothesized that 1) critical environments for unacclimated men and women would be shifted downward [toward lower critical water vapor pressure (Pcrit)] and leftward [toward lower critical temperature (Tcrit)] on a psychrometric chart compared with heat-acclimated subjects because of lower sweating rates, altered sweat distribution, and lower evaporative efficiency; 2) these empirically determined psychrometric limits would fit standard biophysical models of heat exchange; and 3) the derived critical Ke' would be lower for unacclimated subjects than previously published values (3, 13) for fully heat-acclimated subjects.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Subjects. All experimental procedures were approved in advance by the Institutional Review Board at The Pennsylvania State University. After all aspects of the experiment were explained, oral and written informed consent was obtained. Each subject was subsequently approved for the experiment after each completed a medical screening examination. Twenty-one subjects were tested (11 men and 10 women). All subjects were healthy, normotensive, nonsmokers, and not taking any medications that might affect the physiological variables of interest in this study. None of the women was taking oral contraceptives, and no attempt was made to control for menstrual status. Subjects with a maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 max) in the upper or lower 20th percentile for their gender and age (1) were excluded. None of the subjects was physically active outdoors on a regular basis. VO2 max was determined with the use of open-circuit spirometry during a maximal graded exercise test performed on a motor-driven treadmill. Subject characteristics are shown in Table 1. During the experiments, subjects wore thin, short-sleeved cotton tee-shirts, shorts, socks, and walking/running shoes. For consistency with previous studies that have used this minimal clothing ensemble, no clothing corrections were made for this "semi-nude" state (13).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Subject characteristics by group

Chamber characteristics. The environmental chamber used for this study utilized a three-mode controller (proportional, derivative, and integral) to optimize stability and response. Air is vertically discharged in an even pattern through the ceiling and returned through base molding on three sides. Because air returns behind the walls, wall temperature increases linearly with air temperature. The ceiling was mapped for optimal laminar flow. With no forced air movement in the chamber, velocity in the vicinity of the walking subjects was measured at 0.45 m/s. The same chamber was used in the studies by Kamon and colleagues (9, 13, 14), from which comparative data are presented later in this paper.

Testing procedures. Subjects were asked to refrain from vigorous exercise and alcohol consumption during the 24 h before each experiment and from caffeine on the day of the experiment. On arrival, each subject was weighed and donned a Polar heart rate (HR) monitor. The esophageal probe was inserted as the subject drank 5 ml of room temperature water per kilogram body weight. The subject then moved into the preconditioned environmental chamber for equilibration, and skin thermocouples were attached.

Two sets of protocols were used to determine either 1) the Pcrit for the upward inflection of esophageal temperature (Tes) at three distinct Tdb values (34, 36, and 38°C) or 2) the critical Tdb (Tcrit) at three distinct Pa values (12, 16, and 20 Torr). The methods used to determine Pcrit and Tcrit have been previously described (13, 14, 16). Experiments were conducted year-round in randomized order to counterbalance any possible acclimation effects, and no attempt was made to heat acclimate subjects. Each subject participated in all six trials, with at least 2 days separating successive tests.

Each experiment was conducted in a programmable environmental chamber. Tdb and wet-bulb temperature (Twb) were measured every 5 min with the use of precision mercury-in-glass thermometers (traceable standards provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology) mounted in an ASHRAE box (American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-conditioning Engineers). Pa was determined from Tdb and Twb with the use of a standard psychrometric chart.

During the three Tcrit experiments, Pa was held constant and Tdb was systematically increased ~1°C every 5 min after a 30-min equilibration period at 28°C. In the three Pcrit experiments, Tdb was held constant while Pa was increased ~1 Torr every 5 min after a 30-min equilibration period at 9 Torr.

During each test, the subjects walked continuously on a motor-driven treadmill for up to 2.5 h at a speed and grade that approximated 30% of their VO2 max. This exercise intensity was chosen for three reasons: 1) it reasonably simulates light-to-moderate daily workloads typical of a healthy, normally active population, 2) it is the intensity associated with an 8-h work day in industrial settings (5), and 3) it reflects the intensity for many self-paced activities. After the 30-min equilibration period, either the Tdb (Tcrit tests) or the Pa (Pcrit tests) in the chamber was increased in a step-wise fashion while chamber Tdb and Twb and subject Tes, skin temperature (Tsk), and HR were monitored. To ensure that each subject was walking at the prescribed workload, oxygen uptake (VO2) was determined after 30 min with a 3-min expired air sample collected in Douglas bags and analyzed for CO2 concentration (Beckman LB-2, Fullerton, CA), O2 concentration (S-3A oxygen analyzer, Applied Electrochemistry, Sunnyvale, CA), and volume (Parkinson-Cowen dry-gas meter, Cambridge, UK).

Measurements. Tes was measured with a probe made from a thermistor sealed in a pediatric feeding tube. The probe was inserted nasally and lowered in the esophagus to the level of the left atrium, ~0.25 of the subject's standing height. Tsk was measured at four sites: leg (Tleg), thigh (Tth), arm (Tarm), and chest (Tch) with copper-constantan thermocouples. A weighted mean Tsk (in °C) was calculated (25) as
T<SUB>sk</SUB><IT>=</IT>0.3 · T<SUB>ch</SUB><IT>+</IT>0.3 · T<SUB>th</SUB><IT>+</IT>0.2 · T<SUB>arm</SUB><IT>+</IT>0.2 · T<SUB>leg</SUB> (1)
Tes and Tsk were continuously recorded, and HR was recorded at 5-min intervals on a dedicated computer.

Sweating rate was determined from the loss of nude weight, adjusted for water intake on a scale accurate to ±20 g. Respiratory losses were considered negligible. Fluid intake was prohibited between the initial nude weight and the final nude weight. The skin evaporative capacity (Esk) for each test was calculated by multiplying the sweating rate by 0.68 W · h · g-1, the specific heat of vaporization.

Determination of Tcrit and Pcrit. An example of the time course of Tes, Tsk, and environmental conditions for a typical Pcrit test is shown in Fig. 1. Typically, Tes began to plateau by about minute 40 and remained at an elevated steady state as Pa was increased 1 Torr per 5 min. The critical Tdb or Pa was defined by the subsequent upward inflection of Tes. The inflection point was selected graphically from the raw data (see Fig. 1). A line was drawn between the data points, starting at the 30th min. When the mean slope of the Tes line began to deviate upward from the equilibrium phase slope, a second line was drawn from the point of departure of Tes from the first line. The Tdb or Pa 1 min before the point at which the second line departed from the first was defined as the Tcrit or Pcrit, respectively. To confirm graphical representation of the upward inflection of Tes, the slopes were redrawn with different time axes, including logarithmic scales. The upward rise in Tes was typically preceded by an inflection point in the HR time course (13-15) and thus could be anticipated during the test.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Data from a representative critical water vapor pressure (Pcrit) test. Dry-bulb temperature (Tdb) is held constant in this case at 34°C while ambient water vapor pressure (Pa) is systematically increased after a 30-min equilibration period. Esophageal temperature (Tes) of the subject rises to a steady state, dependent on exercise intensity and independent of ambient conditions. After a critical environment is reached, Tes again begins to rise. The Pa at which this inflection is seen is designated the Pcrit, which was 27 Torr in this example. The final rise in Tes is preceded by a steady increase in mean skin temperature (Tsk).

In heat-acclimated subjects, Tes typically equilibrates as a relatively horizontal line before the upward inflection forced by the changing environmental conditions (13-15). However, in the unacclimated subjects tested here, Tes often increased gradually before its upward inflection. This occurred in 55 of the 126 experiments. Such a slow rise was considered a "pseudo-steady state" as long as a clear, definitive upward Tes inflection eventually deviated from this slowly rising slope (13). The difference between the slope of this slow-rising Tes and a zero-slope time course of Tes constituted positive heat storage (+S). To be consistent, in the few (<10) subjects who displayed slightly negative sloping "steady states," negative heat storage (-S) was calculated and S was subsequently incorporated into heat balance calculations designed to determine Ke'.

To test the reliability of the Tcrit and Pcrit data, four individual tests were repeated on a different day. These four repeat experiments were selected to cover the range of environments inherent in this study, i.e., they ranged from the driest to the most humid environment. Because the dependent variable in each case is an x,y locus on a psychrometric chart, typical test-retest statistics would add a third dimension. For this reason, to calculate a test-retest correlation, the time points at which each critical point was achieved were compared. When inflection times were compared between the initial tests and the repeated tests, a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.97 resulted, with a slope of 1.02 and an intercept of -1.11.

Calculation of critical Ke'. All calculations below were performed uniformly across subjects. Metabolic rate (M; W/m2) was derived from the VO2 (l/min) and respiratory exchange ratio (RER; unitless) as
M=352 · (0.23 · RER<IT>+</IT>0.77) · <A><AC>V</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SC>o</SC><SUB>2</SUB>/A<SUB>D</SUB> (2)
where AD is Dubois surface area (m2). External work (W; W/m2) was calculated as
W=0.163 · <IT>m</IT><SUB>b</SUB> · <IT>v</IT><SUB>w</SUB> · fg/A<SUB>D</SUB> (3)
where mb is body mass (kg), vw is walking velocity (m/min), and fg is fractional grade of the treadmill. Mnet was then calculated as M - W.

Dry heat exchange via radiation and convection (W/m2) was determined as
(R+C)=h<SUB>r+c</SUB> · (T<SUB>db</SUB><IT>−</IT>T<SUB>sk</SUB>) (4)
where hr+c (W · m-2 · °C-1) is the combined radiative and convective heat transfer coefficient and Tdb - Tsk represents the temperature gradient between the ambient air and the skin. In this study, hr+c was determined for each subject by using the formula
h<SUB>r+c</SUB><IT>=</IT>6.5 · (treadmill speed; m/s)<SUP>0.39</SUP><IT>+</IT>4.7 (5)
where 6.5 · (treadmill speed; m/s)0.39 is the convective coefficient for treadmill walking directly determined by Nishi and Gagge (22) and 4.7 is the radiative coefficient for indoor environments.

Where appropriate, S (W/m2) was calculated as
S=&Dgr;T<SUB>b</SUB>/&Dgr;<IT>t</IT> · (0.97 W · h · kg<SUP>−1</SUP> · °C<SUP>−1</SUP>) · (<IT>m</IT><SUB>b</SUB>/A<SUB>D</SUB>) (6)
where 0.97 W · h · kg-1 · °C-1 is the specific heat of the body and Delta Tb represents the change in mean body temperature measured over the time period (Delta t, h) between 30 min and the time at which the critical Tes inflection point was observed. The equation for Delta Tb (°C), which is a function of the change in both Tes and Tsk, was
&Dgr;T<SUB>b</SUB><IT>=</IT>(0.9 · T<SUB>es</SUB><IT>+</IT>0.1 · T<SUB>sk</SUB>) at critical point  (7)

− (0.9 · T<SUB>es</SUB><IT>+</IT>0.1 · T<SUB>sk</SUB>) at <IT>minute </IT>30
Maximal evaporative capacity of the environment (Emax; W/m2) was calculated as
E<SUB>max</SUB><IT>=K<SUB>e</SUB>′</IT> · <IT>v</IT><SUP>0.6</SUP> · (P<SUB>s,sk</SUB><IT>−</IT>P<SUB>a</SUB>) (8)
where v (m · s-1) was equal to 0.45 for this study.

At each critical environmental condition, the evaporative cooling required to maintain thermal balance (Ereq) equals Emax, i.e.
M<SUB>net</SUB><IT>±</IT>(<IT>R+C</IT>)<IT>±S=E</IT><SUB>max</SUB> (9)
and the heat balance equation can be solved for Ke'. This solution assumes a fully wetted skin surface, a requirement that, as expected, was met only in the Pcrit tests (see DISCUSSION).

Isothermal lines were constructed on a psychrometric chart from mean group data following the procedures described by Kerslake (17) and Hatch (11) and with the Tsk and the mean Ke' · v0.6 values determined in the present study. The portion of the isotherm for fully wet skin was constructed by using a psychrometric anchor point with locus Tdb = Tsk - (Esk/Mnet), Pa = Ps,sk. The slope of the line (-psi ) was hr+c/(Ke' · v0.6). The curved portion of the isotherm at higher Tdb values and lower Pa values was constructed by calculating the Tdb for free evaporation (using the highest mean evaporative rate for each group) and constructing a curve according to Kerslake (17), where the Tdb for free evaporation = Tdb + (Esk - Mnet)/hr+c. In each case, this assumed that the mean sweating rate for the full exposure time represented the sweating rate at the critical Tc inflection. As shown subsequently by the data collected, this was not the case, especially for the women.

Statistical analysis. Variables that changed throughout conditions were analyzed with an analysis of covariance with repeated measures. A SAS program was written by using the PROC MIXED statement, with independent variables of sex and the fixed critical condition; the dependent variable was the unknown critical environmental parameter. A one-way analysis of variance was used to compare subject characteristics and variables calculated once per trial, e.g., Mnet, (R + C), sweating rate, Ke', and so forth. Where significant F values were found, Tukey's follow-up tests were performed. Differences were considered significant at the 0.05 level.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Subjects for this study were recruited to be representative of the population with respect to body size, adiposity, and aerobic fitness. Thus the women were shorter, weighed less, and had a higher percent body fat and a lower body surface area than the men (all at P < 0.05; Table 1). Body fatness ranged from 11 to 26% for the men and from 16 to 29% for the women. With respect to body mass index, the men ranged from the 18th to the 71st percentile for their age group, whereas the women ranged from the 24th to the 87th percentile (1). The women also had a 13-14% lower VO2 max, which translated to a significantly lower M, Mnet (139 ± 3 vs. 191 ± 6 W/m2, P < 0.001) and Ereq during exercise at 30% VO2 max (Table 2) in each critical environment. The measured exercise intensity ranged from 29.9 ± 1.1 to 32.3 ± 1.0% VO2 max for the men and from 28.3 ± 0.9 to 30.0 ± 1.0% VO2 max for the women across trials (P > 0.05). Mean sweating rate was consistently and significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the women, as was the Esk of the sweat produced (Table 2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Sweating rate and calculated heat balance variables for unacclimated men and women in each critical environment

Table 3 presents the Tdb and Pa psychrometric locus values for each critical environment as well as the mean Ps,sk - Pa. In the tests conducted at Tdb = 34, 36, and 38°C (coinciding with the more humid environments), each respective Pcrit was significantly higher and each Ps,sk - Pa was significantly lower for the women (P < 0.05). No significant sex differences were seen in the critical Ps,sk - Pa for the tests at fixed low ambient vapor pressures. These critical environmental loci are plotted on a standard psychrometric chart in Fig. 2.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Water vapor pressure gradient and critical environmental loci for unacclimated men and women



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   A standard psychrometric chart showing the mean Pcrit and values determined empirically for 11 unacclimated men () and 10 unacclimated women (open circle ). Pcrit values were significantly higher for the women in the humid conditions because of their lower absolute heat production at 30% maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 max), whereas no differences were seen in drier environments (see text for full explanation). The dotted arrowheads point to separate biophysical anchor points with coordinates [Tdb = Tsk - (Esk/Mnet), Pa = Ps,sk] and have a calculated slope (-psi ) = hr+c/Ke' · v0.6, where Esk is skin evaporative capacity, Mnet is net metabolic heat production, Ps,sk is vapor pressure gradient, hr+c is the combined radiative and convective heat transfer coefficient, Ke' is the critical evaporative coefficient, and v is air velocity. Data fit the calculated relation for both the men and the women. On the other hand, the dotted isotherms curving toward a limit for free evaporation at Tdb values above 40°C were significantly lower than the experimental data. These curves transition from full wettedness (w >=  1) to free evaporation (w = 0) and are a function of Tsk and Esk. rh, Relative humidity.

Also shown in Fig. 2 are calculated isothermal lines from previously published biophysical models of heat exchange as described in METHODS. The arrowheads in Fig. 2 extrapolate to two separately calculated biophysical anchor points [Tdb = Tsk - (Esk/Mnet), Pa = Ps,sk], and the lines have slopes of -psi  = hr+c/Ke' · v0.6. The curved portion of the isotherms at higher Tdb and lower Pa values reflect progressive changes in skin wettedness approaching the Tdb for free evaporation, a vertical line at Tdb + (Esk - Mnet)/hr+c. These lines of free evaporation were calculated from the highest mean sweating rate for each group, as was done by Kamon and Avellini (13), and are presented for illustrative purposes. Each subject would have his or her own line based on Esk. It is obvious that the isotherms fit the data well at high humidities but underpredict the empirical data in the hotter, drier environments.

Derived Ke' values are listed for men and women in Table 2. There were no sex differences for Ke' (men = 17.4, 15.5, and 14.2 W · m-2 · Torr-1 and women = 16.8, 15.5, and 14.2 W · m-2 · Torr-1 at 34, 36, and 38°C, respectively). These Ke' values were lower than those previously published for fully heat-acclimated men (18.4 W · m-2 · Torr-1 at 36°C) (3) and women (17.7 W · m-2 · Torr-1 at 36°C and 15.5 W · m-2 · Torr-1 at 38°C) (13). No Ke' values are presented for the Tcrit tests, since the requirement that the skin be fully wet was not met (see DISCUSSION). Further proof is given by the estimated skin wettedness values (w = Esk/Emax) provided in Table 2. In the humid environments, the estimated skin wettedness value exceeds 1.0 by 30-50%, suggesting dripped sweat, whereas this value is <1.0 for the three less humid environments.

Figure 3 shows the critical environments for the unacclimated young women in the present study along with data from a group of heat-acclimated women tested by Kamon and Avellini (13). We believe that this comparison is justified because 1) these data were collected in the same environmental chamber used in our laboratory and 2) the heat-acclimated women were similar in terms of anthropometry, exercised at a similar metabolic rate (150 ± 5 W/m), and were semi-nude, as in our study. Although the psychrometric limits are similar at higher Pa values, the prescriptive zone for the unacclimated women is contracted as Tdb increases and Pa decreases, i.e., as environments become less humid.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Data from the young women tested in the present study ( and solid line) are contrasted with data from a group of fully acclimated women previously tested in our laboratory (open circle  and dashed line). Although the psychrometric limits are similar at higher Pa values, the prescriptive zone for the unacclimated women is contracted as Tdb increases and Pa decreases, i.e., as environments become less humid. This illustrates that the advantages conveyed by improved sweat evaporation after rigorous heat acclimation are most prominent in environments that allow free evaporation of sweat.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The objective of the present study was to determine, for unacclimated subjects, the range of hot ambient environments beyond which Tc would not equilibrate at a level set by exercise intensity. The protocol used was a modification of that developed by Belding and Kamon (3) and refined by Kamon and Avellini (13) and then again refined by Kenney (15, 16). The underlying basis was to empirically determine a family of ambient conditions under which Mnet ± (R + C) = Emax. At full skin wettedness, Emax = Ke' · v0.6 · (Ps,sk - Pa) and Ke' can be derived by solving the heat balance equations involved. Before this investigation, this approach had only been used for fully heat-acclimatized men and women (3, 13, 14).

Potential limitations. The approach utilized in the present paper is built on heat balance calculations that, although theoretically sound, are based on numerous previous investigations, each of which made unique assumptions. Coefficients and calculations chosen for this investigation in some cases followed the previous studies of Kamon and colleagues (3, 13) so that comparisons could be made more directly between the studies. Some coefficients were directly determined, i.e., by naphthalene sublimation (22), whereas others were based on indirect calculations from empirical data. With the exception of Kamon and colleagues (13, 14), subjects in those previous studies were predominantly men.

Psychrometric limits. When Tdb is close to Tsk, dry heat transfer is minimal and heat exposure at a given metabolic rate is limited by the vapor pressure gradient, Ps,sk - Pa. In such environments, one would predict that higher sweating rates typically exhibited by men (2, 4, 6-8, 10, 12, 20, 24) would not be beneficial and that critical limits would be similar between unmatched men and women. Under hotter, drier ambient environments where (R + C) is positive and Emax is high, the limit to prolonged exposure is defined by sweating capacity; men, who typically have higher maximal sweating rates, should have an advantage in these environments. However, such was not the case in this experiment.

As shown in Fig. 2, separate limit lines were observed for the men and women at Tdb = 34-38°C, with the women's limits occurring at higher ambient vapor pressures. This was solely due to the women's lower exercise intensity (18, 19) and corresponding metabolic heat production, as opposed to a true sex difference. We chose a relative exercise intensity of 30% VO2 max because 1) it reasonably simulates light-to-moderate daily workloads typical of a healthy, normally active population, 2) it is the intensity associated with an 8-h work day in industrial settings (5), and 3) it reflects the intensity for many self-paced activities. Furthermore, physiological strain during exercise in the heat is primarily a function of relative intensity. For these reasons, such a choice made sense to satisfy the practical aspects of the study. However, because average (e.g., 50th percentile) men and women differ in VO2 max, our subjects exercised at different absolute intensities that resulted in differing Mnet values.

Within each group, the empirically derived limits in this temperature range fit well with biophysical models published by others (11, 17, 23). In Fig. 2, the depicted dotted arrows point to biophysical anchor points with coordinates [Tdb = Tsk - (Esk/Mnet), Pa = Ps,sk] and have a calculated slope of -psi  = hr+c/Ke' · v0.6. Data fit the calculated relationship for both the men and the women, supporting the fact that the skin was fully wet and adding credibility to the psychrometric limits. On the other hand, the limit lines calculated for free evaporation at Tdb values above 40°C were significantly lower than the experimental data. These curves (shown in Fig. 2) show a gradual curvilinear transition from full wettedness (w >=  1) to free evaporation (w = 0) and are a function of Tsk and Esk. In reality, different individuals would have different limits for free evaporations and thus different vertical limit lines, extending to the right as far as the individual sweat capacity will allow it to go until wettedness drops below 1. The single line drawn in Fig. 2 reflects the highest mean sweating rate for each group.

As argued by Kamon and Avellini (13), the most obvious explanation for the lack of fit of the empirically derived data in hot, dry environments is our use of total sweating rate for the full 1.5- to 2.5-h exposures as representative of the sweating rate at each Tcrit. The experimental protocol prohibits measurement of the true sweating rate at the time each critical environment is reached. Our calculated sweating rate, an average over a long time period (including time spent in less stressful environments early in the exposures and during the transients), likely underpredicts the true sweating rate in the critical environment. If so, the relatively larger overestimate in the unacclimated women might be expected on the basis of the known sluggish onset of sweating (4, 6, 7, 10) and lower sweating rates (2, 4, 6-8, 10, 12, 20, 24) of unacclimated women. It is important to note that such sweating differences are minimized or disappear altogether when women are acclimated and appropriately matched with their male counterparts (e.g., Ref. 9).

As explained in RESULTS, we were able to compare our data with data collected from a group of fully heat-acclimated women tested ~25 yr ago in the same laboratory. The comparison, shown in Fig. 3, clearly elucidates the thermoregulatory advantage imparted by heat acclimation in terms of thermal tolerance. A key adaptation of heat acclimation is a higher sweating rate for any given exercise intensity. Such an increase in sweating would only be advantageous in environments in which ambient Pa is low enough to permit high evaporative rates. In addition, heat-acclimated subjects have a more uniform sweat distribution over the skin surface, which increases evaporative efficiency. These advantages are shown by the flatter slope and higher values of the psychrometric limit line at Tdb values above 40°C in heat-acclimated subjects, delimiting a larger range of environments comprising the prescriptive zone.

Evaporative coefficients. As shown in Table 2, Ke' values at Tdb = 34-38°C were not significantly different between men and women. Calculation of Ke' requires conditions of fully wet skin, and thus only the Ke' values calculated in the more humid environments are meaningful. In the dry environments, the use of Ps,sk when the skin was not fully saturated would result in an overestimate of Emax and an artificially low Ke'. As in previous studies, Ke' decreases slightly with increasing Tdb and decreasing Pa within this temperature range. The values of Ke' for unacclimated men (17.4, 15.5, and 14.2 W · m-2 · Torr-1) and women (16.8, 15.5, and 14.2 W · m-2 · Torr-1 ) at 34, 36, or 38°C, respectively, were lower than those previously published for fully heat-acclimated men (18.4 W · m-2 · Torr-1 at 36°C) (3) and women (17.7 W · m-2 · Torr-1 at 36°C and 15.5 W · m-2 · Torr-1 at 38°C) (13). These values are more appropriate for future models of heat transfer between humans and the environment when heat acclimation is absent.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Jane Pierzga for technical expertise and assistance with data collection and Dr. Mosuk Chow for statistical advice and contributions.


    FOOTNOTES

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01-AG-07004 and M01-RR-10732.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: W. L. Kenney, Noll Physiological Research Center and the Dept. of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802-6900 (E-mail: w7k{at}psu.edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

First published February 8, 2002;10.1152/japplphysiol.01040.2001

Received 12 October 2001; accepted in final form 20 January 2002.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   ACSM. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (5th ed.), edited by Kenney WL.. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1995.

2.   Anderson, GS, Ward R, and Mekjavic IB. Gender differences in physiological reactions to thermal stress. Eur J Appl Physiol 71: 95-101, 1995.

3.   Belding, HS, and Kamon E. Evaporative coefficients for prediction of safe limits in prolonged exposures to work under hot conditions. Fed Proc 32: 1598-1601, 1973.

4.   Bittel, J, and Henane R. Comparison of thermal exchanges in men and women under neutral and hot conditions. J Physiol 250: 475-489, 1975.

5.   Bonjer, FH. Actual energy expenditure in relation to the physical working capacity. Ergonomics 5: 29-31, 1962.

6.   Cunningham, DJ, Stolwijk JAJ, and Wenger CB. Comparative thermoregulatory responses of resting men and women. J Appl Physiol 45: 908-915, 1978.

7.   Fox, RH, and Lofstedt BA. A comparison of thermoregulatory function in men and women. J Physiol 197: 44P-45P, 1968.

8.   Fox, RH, Lofstedt BE, Woodward PM, Eriksson E, and Werkstrom B. Comparison of thermoregulatory function in men and women. J Appl Physiol 26: 444-453, 1969.

9.   Frye, AJ, and Kamon E. Responses to dry heat of men and women with similar aerobic capacities. J Appl Physiol 50: 65-70, 1981.

10.   Grucza, R, Lecroart JL, Hauser JJ, and Houdas Y. Dynamics of sweating in men and women during passive heating. Eur J Appl Physiol 54: 309-314, 1985.

11.   Hatch, T. Assessment of heat stress. In: Temperature: Its Measurement and Control in Science and Industry, edited by Hardy JD.. New York: Kreiger, 1963, p. 307-318.

12.   Horstman, DH, and Christensen E. Acclimatization to dry heat: active men vs. active women. J Appl Physiol 52: 825-831, 1982.

13.   Kamon, E, and Avellini BA. Physiological limits to work in the heat and evaporative coefficient for women. J Appl Physiol 41: 71-76, 1976.

14.   Kamon, E, Avellini BA, and Krajewski J. Physiological and biophysical limits to work in the heat for clothed men and women. J Appl Physiol 44: 908-925, 1978.

15.   Kenney, WL, Lewis DA, Armstrong CG, Hyde DE, Dyksterhouse TS, Fowler SR, and Williams DA. Critical environmental limits to prolonged work in various clothing ensembles. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 49: 390-395, 1988.

16.   Kenney, WL, Mikita DJ, Havenith G, Puhl SM, and Crosby P. Simultaneous derivation of clothing-specific heat exchange coefficients. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25: 283-289, 1993.

17.   Kerslake, DM. The Stresses of Hot Environments. London: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1972.

18.   Lind, AR. A physiological criterion for setting thermal environmental limits for everyday work. J Appl Physiol 18: 51-56, 1963.

19.   Lind, AR. Prediction of safe limits for occupational exposure to heat. Fed Proc 32: 1602-1606, 1973.

20.   Morimoto, T, Slabochova Z, Naman RK, and Sargent F II. Sex differences in physiological reactions to thermal stress. J Appl Physiol 22: 526-532, 1967.

21.   Nielsen, M. Die regulation der korpertemperatur bei muskelarbeit. Scand Arch Physiol 79: 193-230, 1938.

22.   Nishi, Y, and Gagge AP. Direct evaluation of convective heat transfer coefficient by naphthalene sublimation. J Appl Physiol 29: 830-838, 1970.

23.   Nishi, Y, and Gagge AP. A psychrometric chart for graphical prediction of thermal comfort and heat tolerance. ASHRAE Trans 80: 115-130, 1974.

24.   Paolone, AM, Wells CL, and Kelly GT. Sexual variations in thermoregulation during heat stress. Aviat Space Environ Med 49: 715-719, 1978.

25.   Ramanthan, NL. A new weighting system for mean surface temperature of the human body. J Appl Physiol 19: 531-533, 1964.

26.   Saltin, B, and Hermansen L. Esophageal, rectal, and muscle temperature during exercise. J Appl Physiol 21: 1757-1762, 1966.


J APPL PHYSIOL 92(6):2256-2263
8750-7587/02 $5.00 Copyright © 2002 the American Physiological Society




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/6/2256    most recent
01040.2001v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kenney, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Zeman, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kenney, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Zeman, M. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online