|
|
||||||||
1 Wyle Laboratories, Life Sciences Systems and Services Division, and 2 National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas 77058
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two potential
mechanisms, reduced skin blood flow (SBF) and sweating rate (SR), may
be responsible for elevated intestinal temperature (Tin)
during exercise after bed rest and spaceflight. Seven men underwent 13 days of 6° head-down bed rest. Pre- and post-bed rest, subjects
completed supine submaximal cycle ergometry (20 min at 40% and 20 min
at 65% of pre-bed rest supine peak exercise capacity) in a
thermoneutral room. After bed rest, Tin was elevated at
rest (+0.31 ± 0.12°C) and at the end of exercise (+0.33 ± 0.07°C). Percent increase in SBF during exercise was less after bed
rest (211 ± 53 vs. 96 ± 31%; P
0.05),
SBF/Tin threshold was greater (37.09 ± 0.16 vs.
37.33 ± 0.13°C; P
0.05), and slope of
SBF/Tin tended to be reduced (536 ± 184 vs. 201 ± 46%/°C; P = 0.08). SR/Tin threshold
was delayed (37.06 ± 0.11 vs. 37.34 ± 0.06°C;
P
0.05), but the slope of SR/Tin
(3.45 ± 1.22 vs. 2.58 ± 0.71 mg · min
1 · cm
2 · °C
1)
and total sweat loss (0.42 ± 0.06 vs. 0.44 ± 0.08 kg) were
not changed. The higher resting and exercise Tin and
delayed onset of SBF and SR suggest a centrally mediated elevation in
the thermoregulatory set point during bed rest exposure.
core temperature; intestinal temperature; microgravity; spaceflight
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ADAPTATION TO BED
REST AND SPACEFLIGHT includes decreased postflight aerobic
capacity, lower muscular strength and endurance, alterations in
cardiovascular function, and reduced plasma volume (PV)
(6). The ability to perform work during spaceflight,
complete an unaided emergency egress on landing, and participate in
rehabilitation activities after spaceflight are issues of concern that
may be compromised by these adaptations. Physical work capacity may be further reduced by impaired body temperature regulation during rest and
exercise, which in turn may lead to heat strain and injury. For
example, the combined effects of PV loss and loss of heat acclimation
may result in excessive heat strain for Space Shuttle crewmembers
wearing protective garments during launch and landing (35). During a nominal landing (STS-90, April 1998),
before exit from the Space Shuttle, intestinal temperature
(Tin), a measure of core temperature (Tcore),
was significantly elevated in four crewmembers wearing the launch and
entry suit despite the use of a liquid cooling garment
(37). In the event of an emergency egress from the
Shuttle, crewmembers would be disconnected from the thermoelectric
cooling unit supplying the liquid cooling garment to exit the vehicle
and be required to ambulate to a safe distance. This activity would be
completed fully suited and may require an effort in excess of 70% of
the crewmember's preflight peak oxygen consumption
(
O2 peak; Ref. 4). The
combined thermal load of the protective garment and the elevated
metabolic rate during egress would be expected to rapidly increase
Tcore.
We previously examined the thermoregulatory responses of two crewmembers after a 115-day spaceflight (11). Tin was elevated moderately at rest and during exercise in these two crewmembers. Each crewmember had a delayed onset of and/or a decreased slope of sweating rate (SR) response and skin vasodilation. These changes in thermoregulation were observed although crewmembers participated in an inflight exercise countermeasures program, and data were collected 5 days after landing.
Previous investigators have found an impairment in thermoregulation after bed rest, an analog of spaceflight. A higher Tcore after bed rest has been observed during submaximal exercise in both warm (9) and temperate (8, 17) conditions. Elevation in Tcore was ascribed to a decreased ability to increase skin blood flow (SBF) (15) but also may be related to impaired sweating responses (17). Crandall et al. (7) passively heated subjects with a warm water-perfused suit before and after 15 days of bed rest. After bed rest, these subjects had reduced forearm blood flow and vascular conductance both before and during whole body heating.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether heat loss responses were responsible for the impairment of thermoregulation during submaximal exercise after 13 days of bed rest, a duration similar to current Space Shuttle missions. No previous study has measured SBF and SR continuously during exercise to determine their relative contributions to elevated Tcore after bed rest. We hypothesized that after bed rest Tin during exercise would be elevated significantly due to an increase in the Tin threshold and a decrease in the slope of the SBF/Tin response and an increase in the Tin threshold and a reduced slope of the SR/Tin response.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects. Seven healthy men (29 ± 5 yr, 179.6 ± 7.1 cm, 77.2 ± 17.0 kg; mean ± SD) volunteered to participate in this investigation. All subjects completed a modified US Air Force class III physical and were screened for cardiovascular disease by using a Bruce protocol maximal treadmill test with 12-lead electrocardiogram. Subjects with significant ST-segment changes or ectopy were excluded as well as those with a history of hypertension or habitual tobacco, alcohol, and/or drug use. All subjects were given written and verbal explanation of testing and bed rest protocols and signed documentation indicating understanding and consent. All protocols were reviewed and approved by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Johnson Space Center and the University of Texas Medical Branch-Galveston Institutional Review Boards. Bed rest was conducted under medically supervised conditions at the National Institutes of Health General Clinical Research Center at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, TX. Some aspects of this study have been previously reported (2, 3).
Overall protocol. To examine the effect of bed rest on exercise thermoregulation, we employed a repeated measures design in which subjects served as their own controls. We compared pre-bed rest responses to responses measured after 13 days of 6° head-down bed rest.
Before bed rest, subjects completed three testing sessions in the exercise physiology laboratory at the NASA Johnson Space Center. The first session was a test of supine
O2 peak with the use of a cycle
ergometer (Monark 818E) mounted on a specially constructed frame.
Subjects returned to the laboratory on two separate days to complete a
supine submaximal exercise test that consisted of a continuous protocol
of 25 min of supine rest, 20 min of cycling at 40%
O2 peak, and 20 min at 65%
O2 peak. Tests were separated by no
less than 48 h. Tin, skin temperatures (Tsk), SBF, SR, and oxygen consumption
(
O2) were measured during these
tests. These exercise protocols and measurement techniques were used
previously in our laboratory (11, 27).
Subjects were hospitalized for a total of 16 days: 1 day of ambulatory
control, 14 days of 6° head-down bed rest, and 1 day of ambulatory
recovery. On the morning of the first day of hospitalization, PV and
red cell mass were measured. Thereafter, subjects remained active and
upright and participated in muscle strength tests that were part of the
companion study (2, 3). After breakfast on the following
morning, subjects were placed in 6° head-down tilt. Subjects remained
in the head-down position, including during meals and urination, but
were allowed to defecate with the use of a bedside commode. In
addition, subjects were placed in a horizontal position for 30 min/day
as a control for the companion study in which another group of subjects
performed resistance exercise in the horizontal posture. No subjects in
our study performed any exercise during bed rest except for the supine
submaximal exercise test that was part of this protocol on the 13th day
of bed rest. On bed rest day 14, PV and red cell mass were
measured at the same time of day as pre-bed rest.
Supine
O2 peak test.
Subjects reported to the laboratory within 3 wk before the start of bed
rest to complete a
O2 peak test on
a supine cycle ergometer. The
O2 peak test consisted of cycling at a constant cadence of 60 rpm for one 2-min stage at 50 W followed by
three 5-min stages of 100, 125, and 150 W. Thereafter, exercise intensity was increased each minute in 25-W increments until volitional fatigue.
O2 was measured with a
metabolic cart (Qplex I, Quinton Instruments, Seattle, WA) interfaced
with a mass spectrometer (MGA-1100, Marquette Electronics, St. Louis,
MO) and averaged over 30-s intervals. The highest 1-min average was
considered a measure of
O2 peak.
Exercise intensities for the subsequent submaximal exercise test were
estimated (40 and 65% pre-bed rest
O2 peak) from a simple linear
regression of
O2 and exercise
intensity from the
O2 peak test.
Submaximal exercise test. All subjects completed a submaximal exercise test for determination of thermoregulatory responses to exercise twice pre-bed rest and on day 13 of bed rest. Subjects refrained from exercise for 24 h, alcohol ingestion for 24 h, caffeine ingestion for 12 h, and food consumption for 4 h.
Each day of testing, subjects reported to the laboratory at the same time of day and were instrumented for measurement of thermoregulatory responses to supine exercise. Subjects rested for 20 min in the supine position on the cycle ergometer frame. Thereafter, data was collected during 5 min of supine rest and then during supine exercise for 20 min at 40% and 20 min at 65% pre-bed rest
O2 peak. The same absolute exercise
intensities (49 ± 7 and 88 ± 11 W) were performed during
pre- and post-bed rest testing, respectively.
Tin was measured at 1-min intervals with an ingestible
Tcore pill (CorTemp ingestible temperature sensor, Human
Technologies, St. Petersburg, FL) swallowed ~6 h before the test with
a small amount of fluid. The temperature signal from the pill was
transmitted to and stored on an external data logger (CorTemp
Ambulatory Recorder, Human Technologies). We (27) and
others (23) have found that this measure of
Tcore is similar to esophageal temperature
(Tes) during moderate levels of exercise, including the
specific exercise protocol used in this investigation. Tsk
was measured on the upper arm (Tarm), upper chest
(Tchest), thigh (Tthigh), and calf
(Tcalf) also at 1-min intervals with the use of a separate
data logger (Squirrel 1250, Science Electronics, Dayton, OH). Mean
Tsk (


1 · °C
1 × BW × 
O2 peak exercise stage.
SBF was measured continuously on the forearm by using an integrating
laser Doppler probe and measurement system (PeriFlux PF4001, Perimed,
Stockholm, Sweden). Local Tsk at the site of SBF
measurement was held constant at 38°C by using a heated probe holder
collar (PeriTemp 4005, Perimed). Local heating was performed to control
the effect of local Tsk on SBF. Analysis of SBF responses were made by using the manufacturer-provided software (Perisoft, Perimed).
SR was measured by using a multichannel dew point hygrometry system
(Bitronics, Guilford, CN) interfaced with a computer for calculations
of SR at 1-min intervals. The dew point sensor was ventilated
(500-800 ml/min) with ambient air. SR was measured with an
accuracy of ±0.05
mg · cm
2 · min
1. Total body
sweat loss was calculated from dry body weight measured immediately
before and after exercise on a standard calibrated scale (Detecto
Scale, Rosalyn, NY).
O2 was measured
in 30-s intervals by using a metabolic gas analyzer system
(MedGraphics, St. Paul, MN) specifically designed for use on the Space
Shuttle and Russian Mir Space Station. Heart rate (HR) was measured
with the use of a commercially available heart watch (Vantage XL, Polar Electro, Oy, Finland) previously validated in our laboratory
(30).
All measurement devices were calibrated before each testing session.
Ingestible pills and Tsk thermistors were calibrated at
four different temperatures against a certified mercury thermometer in
a water bath at temperatures ranging from 30 to 42°C. A linear regression of the relationship between the measured temperatures and
those from the certified thermometer was used posttest to adjust pill
and thermistor measurements. The laser Doppler probe was calibrated by
using the manufacturer-provided motility standard and zero cell. SBF
values were expressed as percent change from rest (%SBF) because
absolute values within an individual can vary markedly over the surface
of the forearm (21). The gas analysis system was
calibrated with standard gas concentrations (21% O2, balance N2; 10% O2, 10% CO2,
balance N2), and the pneumotach was calibrated by using a
3-liter syringe. The cycle ergometer was calibrated to ±10 W.
PV and red cell mass. PV and red cell mass were measured during the morning of the first day of hospitalization (ambulatory control) and at the same time on the last day of bed rest (day 14) by using the 125I-labeled human serum albumin dilution method and a red blood cell labeling technique with 51Cr (14). Subjects remained supine for at least 30 min before and throughout PV and red cell mass measurements. Blood volume was calculated as the sum of PV and red cell mass. Peripheral hematocrit was measured by using the microhematocrit method. Whole body hematocrit was calculated from the ratio of red cell mass to calculated blood volume. F-cell ratio was calculated as the ratio of whole body hematocrit to venous hematocrit corrected for trapped plasma (0.96).
Data analysis.
The first submaximal exercise test was considered a familiarization
session. Data from the second pre-bed rest submaximal exercise test
were compared with the data collected during the post-bed rest test.
Measurements of Tin, %SBF, SR,
O2, HR,

O2 peak stage, and at minutes
5, 10, 15, and 20 of the 65%
O2 peak stage. Pre- to post-bed rest comparisons of these variables were made by using a two-way ANOVA
in which bed rest and exercise time were repeated factors. Tukey's
honest significant difference test was used to determine when specific
differences occurred. Pre- to post-bed rest changes in the variables of
body weight, body heat storage, total sweat loss, PV, hematocrit, and
red cell mass were compared by using paired t-tests.
2 · min
1
(24) and a %SBF relative to preexercise baseline. Pre- to
post-bed rest thresholds for the onset of sweating and vasodilation and the slope of these responses were compared by using paired
t-tests.
Data are reported as means ± SE, unless otherwise stated.
Statistical significance was determined a priori as P
0.05.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mean pre-bed rest supine
O2 peak of the subjects was
2.52 ± 0.54 l/min (31.6 ± 2.6 ml · kg
1 · min
1). Subjects
attained a peak maximal HR of 174 ± 15 beats/min [91 ± 7%
of age-predicted maximal HR (220
age)] and a peak respiratory exchange ratio of 1.19 ± 0.11. Peak exercise intensity was
146 ± 37 W.
All subjects completed the entire submaximal exercise protocol both
pre- and post-bed rest. Resting or exercise
O2 were similar pre- to post-bed
rest at rest and during the 40%
O2 peak stage (Fig.
1). However,
O2 was significantly less after bed rest at the end of the 65%
O2 peak
stage. HR during the 40%
O2 peak
stage was unchanged after bed rest but was significantly greater after
bed rest at rest and during the 65%
O2 peak exercise stage than during
pre-bed rest. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and
mean arterial pressure (Table 1) were
similar pre- to post-bed rest both at rest and during exercise. There
was no difference in the ambient conditions of the testing room pre-
(23.1 ± 0.2°C, 55.8 ± 4.6% relative humidity) to
post-bed rest (23.6 ± 0.3°C, 55.4 ± 2.8% relative
humidity).
|
|
Post-bed rest Tin (Fig. 1) and Tbody were
significantly greater than pre-bed rest at rest and throughout
exercise. Similarly, body heat content was significantly greater after
bed rest at rest (2,255 ± 188 vs. 2,278 ± 185 kcal) and at
the conclusion of exercise (2,290 ± 195 vs. 2,320 ± 193 kcal) compared with pre-bed rest. However, the change in
Tin and 

%SBF from rest during the 40%
O2 peak stage was not different
from pre- to post-bed rest (Fig.
2A). However, by minute 5 of the 65%
O2 peak stage
and throughout the remainder of the exercise, post-bed rest %SBF was
significantly less than pre-bed rest. The threshold for the
SBF-Tin relationship was delayed significantly after bed
rest (37.09 ± 0.16 vs. 37.33 ± 0.13°C) and
the slope of the response tended to be reduced (536 ± 184 vs.
201 ± 46% · °C
1; P = 0.08, Fig. 2B).
|
There was no difference in total sweat loss during submaximal exercise
pre- to post-bed rest (0.42 ± 0.06 vs. 0.44 ± 0.08 kg).
Mean post-bed rest chest SR was not significantly different from
pre-bed rest at any time point (Fig.
3A). The slope of SR response
(4.03 ± 1.69 vs. 2.33 ± 0.90 mg · min
1 · cm
2;
P = 0.48) was not changed significantly after bed rest,
but Tin at the onset of sweating was increased
significantly (37.06 ± 0.11 vs. 37.34 ± 0.06°C; Fig.
3B).
|

O2 peak stage to end of exercise
was significantly greater than at rest. After bed rest,
Tchest did not increase from rest to the end of exercise. Similarly, there was a significant interaction between bed rest and
exercise time in Tcalf. Before bed rest Tcalf
did not increase from rest to the end of exercise. However, after bed
rest Tcalf at minute 20 of the 40%
O2 peak stage through the remainder of the exercise protocol was significantly greater than at rest.
|
PV decreased significantly (
11.0 ± 1.5%) as a result of bed
rest whether expressed in absolute units (3,259 ± 177 and
2,894 ± 138 ml for pre- and post-bed rest, respectively) or
relative to body mass (43.3 ± 0.9 and 38.4 ± 0.9 ml/kg for
pre- and post-bed rest, respectively). However, there was no change in
body weight from pre- to post-bed rest (pre: 77.2 ± 6.4 kg; post:
77.7 ± 6.3 kg). Red cell mass was also significantly decreased
from pre- to post-bed rest (
5.5 ± 2.1%) when expressed as
absolute values (pre: 1,982 ± 115 ml; post: 1,869 ± 89 ml)
or relative to body mass (26.4 ± 0.8 vs. 24.8 ± 0.8 ml/kg,
respectively). Consequently, there was a significant decrease in blood
volume (pre: 5,258 ± 313 ml; post: 4,770 ± 232 ml).
Peripheral (pre: 42.8 ± 0.9; post: 44.5 ± 1.2) and whole
body (pre: 37.9 ± 0.8; post: 39.3 ± 1.0) hematocrit were
significantly greater after bed rest compared with pre-bed rest. F-cell
ratio was unchanged from pre- (0.92 ± 0.1) to post-bed rest
(0.92 ± 0.0).
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our current findings confirm the results of previous studies that reported an impairment of thermoregulation after bed rest as an analog of spaceflight. Our results suggest that this impairment is due to changes in both the vasodilatory and sweating responses. Delayed onset of SBF and SR responses relative to Tin after bed rest may suggest a resetting of the central control of thermoregulation. Although not statistically significant, the strong tendency for a reduced slope of the SBF/Tin relationship may also suggest a peripheral vascular adaptation. These changes did not prevent our subjects from completing this relatively mild exercise protocol after bed rest. However, the changes could have a negative impact during exercise in less temperate conditions, with more intense or upright exercise, after long duration bed rest or spaceflight (11), and/or during work in impermeable garments such as the launch-and-entry or extravehicular-activity suits.
Tcore. Resting Tin was significantly elevated after bed rest in our subjects by an average of 0.31 ± 0.12°C. Under conditions similar to our study, Ertl et al. (8) reported that rectal temperature (Trec) was significantly elevated during supine rest and after 24 h of bed rest. Fortney (9) also reported that Tes was significantly elevated after 12 days of bed rest during semirecumbent rest in a warm environment (30°C, 50-60% relative humidity). Crandall et al. (7) observed a significant increase in supine resting oral temperature after 15 days of bed rest in subjects wearing a water-perfused suit before the introduction of warm water. In contrast, Greenleaf and Reese (17) observed no change in supine resting Trec in a cool environment in male subjects after 14 days of bed rest. An explanation for differences in these results is unclear, but an increased resting Tcore after bed rest appears to be the predominant finding.
During exercise in our investigation, Tin was elevated after bed rest compared with pre-bed rest (0.30 ± 0.03°C), similar to other investigations (8, 9, 17). However, the change in Tin from rest to the end of exercise in our study after bed rest was not different than pre-bed rest. Ertl et al. (8) reported similar results during 70 min of moderate exercise (58% pre-bed rest
O2 peak) after only 24 h of
bed rest. In contrast, both Greenleaf and Reese (17) and
Fortney (9) observed a greater increase in
Tcore from rest to the end of exercise after 14 days of bed
rest. Subjects in the study by Greenleaf and Reese (17)
performed supine exercise at a lower exercise intensity than in our
study but exercised for 70 min. Fortney (9) employed a
shorter exercise protocol (30 min) but a higher exercise intensity (60% pre-bed rest
O2 peak) in a
semirecumbent position and in a warm room (30°C). The differences
between the results of these studies and ours may be related to the
greater severity of the post-bed rest exercise challenge in the other
investigators' studies.
Increased Tcore during rest and exercise may be the result
of increased heat production, changes in set point of Tcore
for heat loss responses, and/or a reduced transfer of heat from the body. Heat production at rest and during submaximal exercise has been
reported to be unchanged (17, 16) or decreased
(16) as a result of bed rest; there have been no reports
of increased submaximal exercise
O2
(13). In our subjects, there was no change in heat
production either at rest, during 40%
O2 peak, and the first half of the
65%
O2 peak exercise stage, as
exhibited by no change in
O2;
O2 was significantly less after bed
rest at the end of the 65%
O2 peak stage.
Tcore set point and thresholds for the onset of SBF and SR. A change in Tcore set point in this bed rest study may be related to loss of heat acclimation or changes in circadian rhythm. Heat acclimation is associated with decreased resting and exercise Trec and no change in heat storage (5). Our subjects had elevated Tin at rest and during exercise, consistent with deacclimation, and no change in heat storage from pre- to post-bed rest. Buono et al. (5) observed in data from earlier investigations that the thresholds for the onset of sweating and vasodilation appear to decrease to a similar magnitude after acclimation as the decrease in resting Tcore. In our study, Tin was elevated at rest (+0.31 ± 0.12°C) after bed rest to a similar magnitude as the increase in Tin at the onset of vasodilation (+0.33 ± 0.09°C) and sweating (+0.28 ± 0.11°C).
Change in Tcore set point also may have been the result of a circadian shift induced by bed rest. In a 17-day bed rest, Monk et al. (29) demonstrated that the sinusoidal shape of the circadian curve describing Tcore was maintained during bed rest but that the amplitude of the curve was reduced. In agreement with this observation, Lkhagva (28) observed that the nadir of the circadian curve was increased by 0.22°C in three men after 7 days of bed rest. Therefore, although our testing was conducted at the same time of day from pre- to post-bed rest (mid- to late morning), the post-bed rest Tin may have been elevated relative to pre-bed rest due to a change in the amplitude of the circadian curve. This circadian change also may have influenced the thresholds for the onset of SBF and SR. The onset of SBF and SR with exercise (42) and passive heating (1) have been shown to be correlated with circadian rhythm.SBF. Resting Tin in the present study also may have been elevated due to changes in SBF; SR at rest was very small and was not affected by bed rest. Resting SBF could not be assessed by the laser Doppler technique that we used in this investigation, but Tsk is often used as an index of regional SBF. Although resting mean Tsk was not altered after bed rest, resting Tcalf was reduced and Tchest was elevated after bed rest. Similar observations were made during short-duration (90 min) head-down tilt (34), bed rest (25, 44), and spaceflight (33). These changes may be reflective of an altered blood flow distribution, an increased central vs. peripheral distribution of blood volume, which has been a consistent finding after bed rest (13), and/or a greater relative vasoconstriction in the lower body after bed rest. Perhaps heat loss in our subjects at rest was reduced and Tin increased due to a shift in blood flow away from the limbs, where the high surface area-to-volume ratio facilitates heat exchange, and toward the trunk, where the opposite is true. These regional Tsk differences disappeared in our subjects once exercise was commenced.
Our results suggest a significant impairment of SBF responses after bed rest. During exercise, the %SBF from rest was reduced from pre- to post-bed rest in our subjects by minute 5 of exercise at 65%
O2 peak. The onset of
vasodilation from the preexercise baseline was delayed, and the
sensitivity (slope of the response relative to Tin) tended
to be reduced. Ertl et al. (8) reported no change in SBF
from pre- to post-bed rest during exercise despite an increased
Trec, suggesting a decreased sensitivity of the SBF response to increased Trec. Crandall et al.
(7) reported a delayed onset of skin vasodilation and a
decreased SBF sensitivity in men at rest after 15 days of bed rest when
oral temperature was raised passively with a water-perfused suit.
Altered SBF responses observed during exercise after bed rest may be
due to several factors. A reduction in PV, even without a decreased red
cell mass, has a powerful inhibitory effect on SBF during exercise
(31). Lower PV may increase competition between the skin
and muscle vascular system to supply their respective needs
(39). The reduced red cell mass as observed in this study may further reduce SBF as decreased oxygen carrying capacity of the
blood may require that blood flow be diverted from the skin to the
exercising muscles, although this has not been conclusively proven
(41). Crandall et al. (7) suggested that
changes observed in thermoregulatory control of FBF after bed rest
during passive heating may be related to a significant hypovolemia
coupled with an increased plasma sodium and osmotic concentration,
although PV loss during bed rest is typically isotonic
(13).
In addition, there may be a decreased ability to translocate blood from
the splanchnic region to the skin. Savilov et al. (40)
observed a decreased ability to reduce blood volume in the gut during
lower body negative pressure after bed rest, and this decreased ability
to decrease splanchnic blood flow also may occur during exercise
stress. Previous investigators (38) have suggested that
fitness alters the slope of the SBF response and that fitness may
affect the ability to increase SBF by shunting blood from the viscera
(18). In our subjects, although not measured, aerobic
fitness would have been expected to decline by 9-10% as a result
of bed rest (6), and the slope of the SBF response tended
to be reduced.
It is unclear at this time whether the reduction in SBF after bed rest
is related to increased vasoconstriction or decreased active
vasodilation. Previous investigators have suggested that active
vasodilation is impaired by a reduction in PV (22) or a
decrease in fitness (43) as would occur after bed rest.
However, in this study, we were unable to discriminate whether the
reduced SBF was due to enhanced vasoconstriction or reduced
vasodilation due to the possible effects of local heating at the site
of the SBF measurement.
SR. In the present study, we observed no change in local SR during exercise, in the slope of the SR/Tin response, or in total sweat loss but a delayed onset of SR relative to Tin. Results with regard to SR from other bed rest investigations vary. After 24 h of bed rest, neither local SR nor change in body weight during exercise were different from that after 1 h of bed rest (8). After 14 days of bed rest, total sweat loss during exercise was unchanged despite a significantly greater increase in Trec (17). However, after 12 days of bed rest, women in the study by Fortney (9) had a significantly elevated total sweat loss. Alterations in SR response as a result of bed rest are unclear at this time; Johnson and Park (20) observed high variability in SR responses. By using our specific protocol, long-duration bed rest (>14 days) may be required to observe significant changes in the slope of the SR-Tin response, as was seen after long-duration spaceflight (11).
Data from ambulatory subjects would suggest that reduced PV, as observed during bed rest, would be expected to alter SR responses. Hypovolemic subjects would be expected to have a decrease in the slope of the SR/Tes response, decreased total sweat loss, and no change in the Tes threshold for the onset SR during exercise (12). In contrast, we observed a delayed onset of the SR relative to Tin and no change in the slope of the response. Contradictions in the findings of these studies may be related to an acute response to decreased PV due to diuretic usage in ambulatory subjects vs. an adaptation to a gradual PV loss through inactivity and bed rest. However, it is more likely that the shift in the Tin threshold for SR observed in our bed rest subjects was related to a circadian effect.Limitations. Several limitations were inherent in the design and the implementation of this investigation. First, the protocol for this study was designed to be applied to our laboratory's previous long-duration spaceflight investigation (11). We selected a protocol that would allow crewmembers to complete the exercise protocol without exceeding HR limits imposed by the flight crew surgeon, could be performed in ambient conditions as a climate chamber was not readily available at all potential landing sites, and would not result in excessive fatigue or risk to crewmembers. The present protocol was selected as a compromise to elicit sufficient stress to produce the desired thermoregulatory responses yet require minimal time so as not to interfere with a limited testing schedule available in consideration of other postflight investigations.
Second, our interpretation of SBF results was somewhat limited by the methods with which we chose to measure SBF. First, we were able to assess only relative changes in SBF from rest and did not measure an absolute resting SBF. However, resting SBF has been reported to be reduced after bed rest (7), and it is therefore possible that the absolute impairment of SBF is more severe than the relative responses that we currently report. Second, local heating at the measurement site may have obscured observations possible at lower Tsk. Finally, the vasodilator response to the application of local heating to establish preexercise baseline SBF may not have been equal before and after bed rest. If the response to local heating were increased after bed rest, then it is possible that the maximal SBF was reached early in exercise and would be observed as a decrease in the change in SBF relative to resting conditions. However, if the response to passive heating were reduced as suggested by Crandall et al. (7), then the reduced absolute vasodilatory response would have been more extreme than that which we observed. Third, due to constraints imposed by other companion investigations, PV and red cell mass measurements were obtained within 24 h after the performance of the submaximal exercise protocol performed on bed rest day 13. High-intensity exercise has been shown to increase PV for up to 48 h. Although the intensity of exercise in this study was low, it is possible that the exercise performed in this study may have partially restored the bed rest-induced PV loss at the time of measurement.Perspectives. The microgravity and spacecraft environment may further challenge the thermoregulatory system. Previous authors (26) have suggested that sweating responses may be reduced during spaceflight through the formation of a film of sweat on the surface of the skin because of reduced sweat drippage, which may impair air flow across the skin and sweat evaporation. Furthermore, the reduced gravity may impair the natural convection in which air rises or falls due to differences in density (32), and low air flow in the cabin of space vehicles may limit heat loss capacity (10).
Changes in thermoregulatory control may be more extreme after long-duration spaceflight than that observed in the present investigation. In a previous study, our laboratory (11) reported that the thermoregulatory mechanisms were severely impaired in two crewmembers when performing this same testing protocol after 115 days of spaceflight despite participating in an in-flight exercise countermeasures program. Postflight, neither crewmember completed the 65% preflight
O2 peak stage,
and there was a faster rise in Tin. Both crewmembers had
reduced SBF and SR responses. Therefore, impaired thermoregulation also
may impact rehabilitation plans after long-duration spaceflight. Care
has been taken to limit exposure to conditions of heat, humidity, and
intense activity.
In summary, 13 days of bed rest resulted in higher Tin both
at rest and during exercise without a significant increase in body heat
storage. Higher Tin during rest and exercise appears to be
related to reduced heat loss due to altered SBF and SR responses. These
effects have the potential to impact the activities of astronauts during and after spaceflight, especially after long-duration missions. In addition, patients in bed rest who may be undergoing heat or exercise therapies also may be adversely affected.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors thank the subjects for participation in this
investigation; Dr. Steve Leiberman and Dr. Todd Schlegel for medical monitoring; Dr. Marcas Bamman, Laura Steinman, and the NASA Test Subject Facility at Johnson Space Center for assistance with
coordinating subjects, interactions with companion studies, and
exercise testing; Dr. Charles Stuart and the General Clinical Research
Center Staff at University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, TX,
for monitoring of bed rest subjects; Dr. Martin Nusynowitz and Walter
Durham for measurement of PV and red cell mass; Dr. Steve Siconolfi for the measurement of
O2 peak; and
Richard Rascatti for his assistance with the dew point hygrometry system.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported by the NASA-Mir Pathfinder program and NASA Contract no. NAS9-18492. This study was conducted in the General Clinical Research Center at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, TX, funded by National Center for Research Resources Grant M01 RR-00073.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. M. Schneider, Johnson Center #126, Dept. of Exercise Science, Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 (E-mail: sschneid{at}unm.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
10.1152/japplphysiol.00105.2001
Received 20 February 2001; accepted in final form 23 January 2002.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Aoki, K,
Kondo N,
Shibasaki M,
Takano S,
Tominaga H,
and
Katsuura T.
Circadian variation of sweating responses to passive heat stress.
Acta Physiol Scand
161:
397-402,
1997[ISI][Medline].
2.
Bamman, MM,
Clarke MSF,
Feeback DL,
Talmadge RJ,
Stevens BR,
Leiberman SA,
and
Greenisen MC.
Impact of resistance exercise during bed rest on skeletal muscle sarcopenia and myosin isoform distribution.
J Appl Physiol
84:
157-163,
1998
3.
Bamman, MM,
Hunter GR,
Stevens BR,
Guilliams ME,
and
Greenisen MC.
Resistance exercise prevents plantar flexor deconditioning during bed rest.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
29:
1462-1468,
1997[ISI][Medline].
4.
Bishop, PA,
Lee SMC,
Conza NE,
Clapp L,
Moore AD,
Williams WJ,
Guilliams ME,
and
Greenisen MC.
Carbon dioxide accumulation, walking performance, and metabolic cost in the NASA Launch and Entry Suit.
Aviat Space Environ Med
70:
656-665,
1999[Medline].
5.
Buono, MJ,
Heaney JH,
and
Canine KM.
Acclimation to humid heat lowers resting core temperature.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
274:
R1295-R1299,
1998
6.
Convertino, VA.
Exercise and adaptation to microgravity environments.
In: Handbook of Physiology. Enviornmental Physiology. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc, 1996, sect. 4, vol. II, chapt. 36, p. 815-843.
7.
Crandall, CG,
Johnson JM,
Convertino VA,
Raven PB,
and
Engelke KA.
Altered thermoregulatory responses after 15 days of head-down tilt.
J Appl Physiol
77:
1863-1867,
1994
8.
Ertl, AC,
Dearborn AS,
Weiderhofer AR,
Bernauer EM,
and
Greenleaf JE.
Exercise thermoregulation after 1 and 24-hours of 6° head-down tilt.
Aviat Space Environ Med
71:
150-155,
2000[Medline].
9.
Fortney, SM.
Thermoregulatory adaptations to inactivity.
In: Adaptative Physiology to Stressful Environments, edited by Samueloff S,
and Yousef MK.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1987, p. 75-84.
10.
Fortney SM. Exercise thermoregulation: possible effects of
spaceflight. SAE Int, 21st Int Conf Env Sys, San Francisco, CA,
July 15-18, 1991. (Spec. SAE Rep. 911460)
11.
Fortney, SM,
Mikhaylov V,
Lee SMC,
Kobszev Y,
Gonzalez RR,
and
Greenleaf JE.
Body temperature and thermoregulation after 115-day space flight.
Aviat Space Environ Med
69:
137-141,
1998[Medline].
12.
Fortney, SM,
Nadel ER,
Wenger CB,
and
Bove JR.
Effect of blood volume on sweating rate and body fluids in exercising humans.
J Appl Physiol
51:
1594-1600,
1981
13.
Fortney, SM,
Schneider VS,
and
Greenleaf JE.
The physiology of bed rest.
In: Handbook of Physiology. Environmental Physiology. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc, 1996, sect. 4, vol. II, chapt. 39, p. 889-939.
14.
Glass, HI.
Standard techniques for the measurement of red cell mass and plasma volume.
Br J Haemotol
25:
801-814,
1973[ISI][Medline].
15.
Greenleaf, JE.
Exercise thermoregulation with bed rest, confinement, and immersion deconditioning.
Ann NY Acad Sci
813:
741-750,
1997
16.
Greenleaf, JE,
Ertl AC,
and
Bernauer EM.
Submaximal exercise
O2 and
c during 30-day 6° head-down bed rest with isotonic and isokinetic exercise training.
Aviat Space Environ Med
67:
314-319,
1996[Medline].
17.
Greenleaf, JE,
and
Reese RD.
Exercise thermoregulation after 14 days of bed rest.
J Appl Physiol
48:
72-78,
1980
18.
Ho, CW,
Berd JL,
Farrell PA,
Minson CT,
and
Kenney WL.
Age, fitness, and regional blood flow during exercise in the heat.
J Appl Physiol
82:
1126-1135,
1997
19.
Horstman, DH,
and
Horvath SM.
Cardiovascular and temperature regulatory changes during progressive dehydration and euhydration.
J Appl Physiol
33:
446-450,
1972
20.
Johnson, JM,
and
Park MK.
Effect of upright exercise on threshold for cutaneous vasodilation and sweating.
J Appl Physiol
50:
814-818,
1981
21.
Johnson, JM,
Taylor WF,
Shepherd AP,
and
Park MP.
Laser-Doppler measurement of skin blood flow: comparison with plethysmography.
J Appl Physiol
56:
798-803,
1984
22.
Kellogg, DL,
Johnson JM,
and
Kosiba WA.
Baroreflex control of active vasodilator system in man.
Circ Res
66:
1420-1426,
1990
23.
Kolka, MA,
Quigley MD,
Blanchard LA,
Toyota DA,
and
Stephenson LA.
Validation of a temperature telemetry system during moderate and strenuous exercise.
J Therm Biol
18:
203-210,
1993.
24.
Kolka, MA,
Stephenson LA,
Rock PB,
and
Gonzalez RR.
Local sweating and cutaneous blood flow during exercise in hypobaric environments.
J Appl Physiol
62:
2224-2229,
1987
25.
Krupina, TN,
and
Ya Tizul A.
Clinical aspects of changes in the nervous system in the course of 49-day antiorthostatic hypokinesia.
Ksom Biol Aviakosm Med
11:
26-31,
1977.
26.
Leach, CS,
Leonard JI,
Rambaut PC,
and
Johnson PC.
Evaporative water loss in man in a gravity-free environment.
J Appl Physiol
45:
430-436,
1978
27.
Lee, SMC,
Williams WJ,
and
Fortney Schneider SM.
Measurement of core temperature during supine exercise: esophageal, rectal, and intestinal temperatures.
Aviat Space Environ Med
71:
939-945,
2000[Medline].
28.
Lkhagva, L.
Circadian rhythym of human body temperature in antiorthostatic position.
Kosm Biol Aviakosm Med
14:
59-31,
1980[Medline].
29.
Monk, TH,
Buysse DJ,
Billy BD,
Kennedy KS,
and
Kupfer DJ.
The effects on human sleep and cicadian rhythms of 17 days of continuous bed rest in the absence of daylight.
Sleep
20:
858-864,
1997[ISI][Medline].
30.
Moore, AD,
Lee SMC,
Greenisen MC,
and
Bishop PA.
Validity of a heart rate monitor during work in the laboratory and on the Space Shuttle.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J
58:
299-301,
1997[ISI][Medline].
31.
Nadel, ER,
Fortney SM,
and
Wenger CB.
Effect of hydration state on circulatory and thermal regulation.
J Appl Physiol
49:
715-721,
1980
32.
Novak, L.
Our experience in the evaluation of thermal comfort during space flight and in the simulated space environment.
Acta Astronaut
23:
179-186,
1991[ISI][Medline].
33.
Novak, L,
Genin AM,
and
Kozlowksi S.
Skin temperature and thermal comfort in weightlessness.
The Physiologist
23, Suppl:
S139-S140,
1980[Medline].
34.
Novak, L,
Ulicny B,
Wilhelm Z,
Barak J,
Koshcheev VS,
Utekhin BA,
Kuznets EI,
and
Yakovleva EV.
The simulation of thermal microclimate in the garment similar to those observed in weightlessness.
The Physiologist
31, Suppl:
S38-S39,
1988.
35.
Pandolf, KB,
Stroschlein LA,
Gonzalez RR,
and
Sawka MN.
Predicting human heat strain and performance with applications to space operations.
Aviat Space Environ Med
66:
364-368,
1995[Medline].
36.
Ramanathan, NL.
A new weighting system for mean surface temperature of the human body.
J Appl Physiol
19:
531-533,
1964
37.
Rimmer, DW,
Djik DJ,
Ronda JM,
Hoyt R,
and
Pawelczyk JA.
Efficacy of liquid cooling garments to minimize heat strain during Space Shuttle deorbit and landing (Abstract).
Med Sci Sports Exerc
31:
S305,
1999.
38.
Roberts, MF,
Wenger CB,
Stolwijk JAJ,
and
Nadel ER.
Skin blood flow and sweating changes following exercise training and heat acclimation.
J Appl Physiol
43:
133-137,
1977
39.
Rowell, LB.
Human Circulation: Regulation During Physical Stress. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1986, p. 96-116.
40.
Savilov, AA,
Lobachik VI,
and
Babin AM.
Cardiovascular function of man exposed to LBNP tests.
The Physiologist
33, Suppl:
S128-S132,
1990[Medline].
41.
Sawka, MN,
and
Coyle EF.
Influence of body water and blood volume on thermoregulation and exercise performance in the heat.
In: Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, edited by Holloszy JO.. New York: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 1999, p. 167-218.
42.
Stephenson, LA,
Wenger CB,
O'Donovan BH,
and
Nadel ER.
Circadian rhythm in sweating and cutaneous blood flow.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
246:
R321-R324,
1984
43.
Thomas, CM,
Pierzga JM,
and
Kenney WL.
Aerobic training and cutaneous vasodilation in young and older men.
J Appl Physiol
86:
1676-1686,
1999
44.
Tizul Ya, A.
The Function of Thermoregulation in Protracted Limitation of Motor Activity (Hypokinesia). Houston, TX: NASA, 1974, p. 1-7. (Spec. NASA Rep. F-15, 566)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Shibasaki, T. E. Wilson, and C. G. Crandall Neural control and mechanisms of eccrine sweating during heat stress and exercise J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2006; 100(5): 1692 - 1701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A M Edwards and N A Clark Thermoregulatory observations in soccer match play: professional and recreational level applications using an intestinal pill system to measure core temperature Br. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2006; 40(2): 133 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shibasaki, T. E. Wilson, J. Cui, B. D. Levine, and C. G. Crandall Exercise throughout 6{degrees} head-down tilt bed rest preserves thermoregulatory responses J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2003; 95(5): 1817 - 1823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Crandall, M. Shibasaki, T. E. Wilson, J. Cui, and B. D. Levine Prolonged head-down tilt exposure reduces maximal cutaneous vasodilator and sweating capacity in humans J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2003; 94(6): 2330 - 2336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||