|
|
||||||||
1 Hôpital Laval and Kinesiology, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada G1K 7P4; 2 Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110; 3 Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva CH-1211, Switzerland; 4 Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, Laval University, Sainte-Foy, Canada G1V 4G2; 5 Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843; 6 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55108; 7 Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405; 8 Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808-4121
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The uncoupling protein 3 (UCP3) is
a mitochondrial membrane transporter mainly expressed in skeletal
muscle that we have shown to be associated with obesity.
We have analyzed UCP3 polymorphisms, Val102Ile, Tyr210Tyr, and a new
microsatellite GAIVS6 located in the sixth intron, among 276 black and
503 white subjects from the HERITAGE Family Study. Linkage and
association studies were undertaken with body composition variables
measured in a sedentary state (baseline) and after 20 wk of endurance
training (changes). Allele and genotype frequencies were found to be
significantly different between whites and blacks. Suggestive linkages
(0.009
P
0.033) with Tyr210Tyr were found in
blacks and whites for baseline body mass index, fat mass, or leptin
level and with GAIVS6 in whites for changes in fat mass and percent
body fat. Associations were also found in whites between GAIVS6 and
changes in the sum of eight skinfold thicknesses (P = 0.0006), with a borderline result for body mass index
(P = 0.06). We concluded that UCP3 could be involved in
body composition changes after regular exercise.
microsatellite; polymorphism; fat; association; linkage
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
UNCOUPLING PROTEIN (UCP)1 is located in the inner membrane of mitochondria, where it uncouples phosphorylation from the cellular respiratory chain, producing heat instead of ATP (19). It is exclusively expressed in brown adipose tissue that is present in newborn humans but is practically absent in adults. Four other UCPs have been recently uncovered. UCP2 is expressed in most human tissues (14), whereas UCP3 is mainly expressed in human skeletal muscle (4). UCP4 is exclusively expressed in human and rodent brain tissue (30), whereas UCP5 or brain mitochondrial carrier protein 1 transcripts are present in multiple human and mouse tissues, with a higher abundance in the brain and testis (40). The UCP1 gene is located on chromosome 4q31, UCP2 and UCP3 on chromosome 11q13 with only 7 kilobases separating each other (27), and UCP4 at 6p11.2-q12 (22). The chromosome location of UCP5 has not been reported yet. High homology between the amino acid sequence of the different UCPs is observed. UCP2 and UCP3 have, respectively, 55% (14) and 56% (4) homology with UCP1 and 73% homology between them (4). There are two isoforms of UCP3: a long form (UCP3L) and a short form (UCP3S), which lacks the sixth potential transmembrane region. Studies using transfected yeast and mammalian cells (see Ref. 24 for review), reconstituted systems (12), and muscle mitochondria of transgenic mice (11, 15, 39) have shown that UCP3 behaves as a functional UCP. A recent study also showed that UCP3 protein increases thermogenesis in yeast cells (17), although the matter remains controversial in mammalian cells because the same conditions that upregulate UCP3 expression do not change mitochondrial membrane potential (8).
Skeletal muscle plays an important role in energy homeostasis and substrate oxidation, and this tissue is a major site of thermogenesis in humans (2). Skeletal muscle may contribute to as much as 40% of the whole body adrenaline-induced thermogenesis (34). Mice overexpressing human UCP3 in muscle were shown to be hyperphagic but lean (11). Although no phenotypic difference between UCP3 knockout and control mice was observed (15, 39), alternative compensatory mechanisms cannot be excluded.
Because of its potential role in energy metabolism and its expression in skeletal muscle, UCP3 is a good candidate gene for the regulation of body composition and its response to training. It was shown that treadmill running in rats rapidly induces skeletal muscle UCP3 mRNA expression and that this induction results in a corresponding increase in rat UCP3 protein (41). Tsuboyama-Kasaoka et al. (38) reported that a single 1-h bout of exercise in rats increases UCP3 expression in the gastrocnemius and quadriceps muscles and that this increase disappeared rapidly within 24 h after the exercise bout. In humans, acute exercise was shown to have no effect on UCP3S and UCP3L expression (31) or to increase transiently UCP3 (28). In contrast, training was also found to decrease UCP3 expression in rats (4) and in humans (31).
Otabe et al. (26) found that the effects of regular
physical activity on the body weight of obese and normal-weight
subjects was influence by a C
T polymorphism in the 5' flanking
region (
55 C/T) of the UCP3 gene. The same
55 C/T polymorphism was found to be associated with a decreased risk of developing Type 2 diabetes in a French cohort (23) and with an increased
waist-to-hip ratio in European and South Indian women (9).
In the Québec Family Study (QFS), we also reported strong
associations between a UCP3 microsatellite marker and obesity and body
composition-related phenotypes (20).
In the present study, we investigated the linkage and association between three UCP3 polymorphisms and body composition-related phenotypes and their change in response to chronic endurance training in the HERITAGE Family Study.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects. The aims, design, and measurement protocol of the HERITAGE Family Study cohort have been previously described (5). The study includes volunteer black and white nuclear families from five centers: Québec City; Phoenix, AZ; Minneapolis, MN; Austin, TX; and Indianapolis, IN. Participants were required to be sedentary at baseline and in good health to be eligible for the study. Individuals with a resting systolic blood pressure of >159 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure of >99 mmHg, as well as those taking antihypertensive medication, were excluded. All exclusion criteria have been described before (5). A total of 276 black subjects, including 77 parents (52 women and 25 men) and 199 offspring (133 women and 66 men) from 94 families, and 502 whites with 190 parents (93 women and 97 men) and 312 offspring (164 women and 148 men) from 99 families were available for the present study. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. The study was approved by the internal review board of each participating institution.
Phenotype measurements. Subjects were tested for a battery of anthropometric and physiological variables before and after a 20-wk exercise training program that is described later. Body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) was derived from height and weight measured using a stadiometer and a balance beam scale. Skinfold thicknesses were measured twice at eight different sites (biceps, triceps, medial calf, thigh, subscapular, suprailiac, abdominal, and midaxillary) with an Harpenden caliper after the procedure recommended by Lohman (21). A third measurement was taken if the first two differed by >1.0 mm. The two measurements (the two closest when three measurements were taken) were averaged and used as the final value. The sum of the eight skinfold thicknesses (SF8) was used as an indicator of the amount of subcutaneous fat. Percent body fat (%Fat) was estimated from body density measurements obtained by underwater weighing and the equations of Siri (3) and Lohman (21) for white men and women, respectively, and of Schutte et al. (33) and Ortiz et al. (25) for black men and women, respectively. Fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM), both in kilograms, were calculated from %Fat and body weight. Leptin (Lep) level (ng/ml) was evaluated by a RIA (Linco Research, St. Charles, MO), in which the lowest quantity detectable was 0.5 ng/ml in plasma. In this study, baseline data (before the exercise program) and changes (posttraining data minus baseline) were analyzed.
Training program. The subjects were trained on cycle ergometers, three times a week for 20 wk, using the same standardized protocol. The subjects exercised at a heart rate (HR) corresponding to 55% of their baseline maximal oxygen consumption for 30 min per session at the beginning, increasing progressively toward a HR associated with 75% of their baseline maximal oxygen consumption for 50 min. This level was maintained during the last 6 wk of training. The intensity and duration of the training program were adjusted every 2 wk. Training intensities at each exercise session were adjusted individually by a computer system. HR was monitored during all training sessions with a computerized cycle ergometer system (Universal FitNet System), which adjusted the ergometer resistance to maintain target HR. More details about the training program can be found elsewhere (35, 36).
UCP3 genetic markers. Genomic DNA was prepared from permanent lymphoblastoid cells by the proteinase K and phenol-chloroform technique. DNA was dialyzed four times against Tris-EDTA buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) for 6 h at 4°C and ethanol precipitated. Genotyping of a dinucleotide GA microsatellite located in intron 6 of the UCP3 gene (GAIVS6) was done as previously described (20). Briefly, PCR was performed using 50 ng of genomic DNA, 40 nM of untagged primer, 10 nM of infrared tagged M13 primer (LiCor, Lincoln, NE), 125 µM 2-deoxynucleotide 5'-triphosphate, and 0.3 units of Taq polymerase in PCR buffer (Boehringer Mannheim) in a final volume of 10 µl. The upstream primer tailed with a M13 sequence (lower case) and downstream primer were 5'-cacgacgttgtaaaacgacTAGAACTGTGAGAATTCGCTGC-3' and 5'-ACATCAGGTGGAGTGCTAGG-3', respectively. PCR conditions consisted of one cycle at 93°C for 5 min and 30 cycles at 94°C for 20 s and at 60°C for 1 min (Ericomp, San Diego, CA). PCR products were analyzed using automatic DNA sequencers and the genotyping software SAGA (LiCor).
Two others polymorphisms were studied: a valine to isoleucine substitution at amino acid 102 [V102I(G
A)] and a C-to-T nucleotide transition in tyrosine 210 codon [Y210Y(C
T)]
(10). For the V102I(G
A) polymorphism, a genomic DNA
fragment was amplified by PCR using forward 5'-GCATCGGCCTCTATGACTAC-3'
and reverse 5'-CTTGACCCGCACACTTTCAGCCAC-3' primers. PCR conditions were
one cycle at 94°C for 5 min; 40 cycles at 94°C for 30 s,
52°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s; and one cycle at 72°C
for 10 min. The 100-bp PCR product was digested with 5 units of Tth111
I for 5 h at 65°C. V102(G) allele produced fragments of 80 and
20 bp, and I102(A) allele produced fragments of 100 bp. For the
Y210Y(C
T) variant, forward 5'-TCAAGGAGAAGCTGCTGGAGT-3' and
reverse 5'-TACTAGGCACTGCTTCTCTCTCTG-3' primers were used with PCR
conditions of one cycle at 94°C for 5 min; 40 cycles of 94°C for
30 s, 53°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s; and one
cycle at 72°C for 10 min. The 130-bp PCR product was digested with 5 units of Rsa I at 37°C overnight. The Y210(C) allele
exhibited fragments of 110 and 20 bp, and the Y210(T) allele exhibited
a fragment of 130 bp. DNA fragments were resolved on a 3% agarose gel
and visualized with ethidium bromide. All PCR reactions were performed in a GeneAmp PCR system 9600 (Perkin Elmer, Foster City, CA) using Taq DNA polymerase purchased from QIAGEN (Santa Clara, CA).
Statistical analysis. For linkage studies, phenotypic variables were adjusted within race, gender, and age groups for age and age2 using a regression procedure. Lep was also further adjusted for FM. The response phenotypes (delta score) were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the posttraining value. Response phenotypes were further adjusted for corresponding baseline values and Lep for changes in FM. Residuals were then standardized to a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. The sib-pair linkage analysis was performed on nuclear families using the SIBPAL version 3.0 software from the SAGE package, with the t-statistic and the degrees of freedom adjusted for the nonindependence of sib-pairs.
For the association analyses, phenotypes were compared among genotypes using the covariance analysis with the same covariates as for linkage. The mixed procedure was used to correct for nonindependence among family members. That is, the main effects of genotype, age, and gender (etc.) were included in the model, and all analyses were conducted separately by race. Because the frequencies of allele 236 bp of GAIVS6 was <1%, it was grouped with other genotypes for analysis. The heterozygotes for this allele were grouped with the homozygotes for the other allele. For example, subjects with 236/238-bp genotype were grouped with 238/238-bp genotypes. No homozygote for this allele was observed. Alleles 244 and 256 observed in the QFS (20) were not observed in HERITAGE. The SAS package (versions 6.12 and 6.8) for PC was used for the analysis. Probability values (P) of linkage and association tests were adjusted, where indicated, for multiple tests using the Bonferroni correction in which the adjusted P value = 1
(1
P)number
of traits.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have studied the impact of the three UCP3 gene
polymorphisms, V102I(G
A), Y210Y(C
T), and GAIVS6, on body
composition-related phenotypes in the HERITAGE Family Study, before and
after a 20-wk exercise-training period. Descriptive statistics of the
phenotypes investigated are shown in Table
1 for whites and blacks, by generation and by gender. Lean, overweight, and obese individuals are present in
both white and black groups in the following proportions: 50% normal
weight (BMI <25), 31% overweight (BMI between 25 and 30), and 19%
obese (BMI >30) in whites, and 36, 32, and 32%, respectively, in
black subjects. These proportions were significantly different between
blacks and whites [
2 = 18.34 with 2 degrees of
freedom (df) and P = 0.001]. Black subjects had higher
mean values than whites for adiposity phenotypes, except for male
parents in whom the opposite was observed.
|
Allele and genotype frequencies for the three polymorphisms are
presented in Table 2 and are
significantly different between blacks and whites (P = 0.001 for each of the three polymorphisms). Polymorphisms were in
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in whites [GAIVS6:
2 = 7.33, 6 df, P = 0.29; V102I(G
A):
2 = 0.002, 1 df, P = 0.96;
Y210Y(C
T):
2 = 0.005, 1 df, P = 0.94] and blacks [GAIVS6:
2 = 8.90, 6 df,
P = 0.18; V102I(G
A):
2 = 3.64, 1 df, P = 0.06; Y210Y(C
T):
2 = 0.90, 1 df, P = 0.34]. Only three white subjects were
carriers of the variant allele for the V102I(G
A) polymorphism. The
three polymorphisms were in linkage disequilibrium with each other in blacks (P < 0.001), as well as in whites (P < 0.001).
|
Some evidence of linkage (0.003
P
0.03) with
baseline body composition phenotypes was found in whites with
Y210Y(G
A) and for changes after training with GAIVS6 (Table
3). After Bonferroni correction for
multiple comparisons, all linkage results did not remains
significant. Linkage analysis with V102I(G
A) was not performed
in whites, because all but three subjects were homozygous for the
wild-type allele. Weak linkages were also found among blacks between
Y210Y and bBMI and bSF8 (P = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively).
|
Association results are shown in Table 4
and Fig. 1. Evidence of association
was observed between the GAIVS6 polymorphism and training-induced
changes in SF8 and, to a lower extent, BMI among whites (Table 4 and
Fig. 1). Subjects with the 240-240 genotype showed significantly
greater reduction in SF8, with borderline value for BMI and a similar
but nonsignificant pattern of variation for FM and %Fat. Carriers of
the 238-bp allele showed a smaller reduction for those phenotypes,
whereas subjects with genotypes including the 242 bp (240-242 and
242-242), but not the 238 bp, showed generally the smallest drop
or even a gain in response to training. When association analysis was
performed after genotype grouping, according to apparent allelic
dominance (allele 238 bp over 242 and 240 bp, and 242 bp over 240 bp),
resulting in carriers of allele 238 bp vs. other genotypes with allele
242 bp vs. homozygotes for the allele 240 bp, stronger associations were observed (Fig. 1). No other associations in whites and blacks were
observed for the GAIVS6 polymorphism or for the other UCP3 polymorphisms studied (data not shown). When analysis was undertaken by
gender, results remained significant only among women, with changes in
BMI, SF8, and FM (0.01
P
0.03) (data not
shown), but the number of subjects was low (between 2 and 5) for some genotype groups.
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
UCP3 is a protein mainly expressed in skeletal muscle, an important tissue in thermogenesis and in the adaptation to training. In brief, we have observed associations in whites between the GAIVS6 polymorphism in the UCP3 gene and changes in body composition-related phenotypes after a 20-wk exercise-training program.
Subjects homozygous for the 240-bp allele had a greater loss of adiposity than did subjects with other genotypes. Our laboratory previously reported associations with BMI, sum of six skinfolds, FM, and %Fat for the same polymorphism in the QFS (20). For instance, in QFS, the 240/240-bp genotype was associated with a higher adiposity, in contrast to the 238-bp allele carriers who were leaner. Also, in both the QFS and HERITAGE studies, the 240/240-bp genotype was the genotype showing the greatest response, with either baseline body composition in QFS or body mass and subcutaneous fat changes with training in the HERITAGE Family Study. Carriers of the 238-bp allele had lower values for body composition phenotypes after training compared with baseline but not as much as homozygotes 240/240 bp. Carriers of the 242-bp allele showed an inverse effect of training, with the 240/242- and 242/242-bp genotypes showing an increase in BMI after training. From these observations, we conclude that the 240/240-bp genotype is more responsive to biochemical, physiological, and genetic environments. We also conclude that the allele 238 appears to be dominant over alleles 242 and 240, and allele 242 appears to be dominant over allele 240. Interestingly, the effect is observed only in women when the analyses were done by gender, but this result has to be confirmed because of the low number of subjects (between 2 and 5) in some genotype groups.
However, in contrast to QFS, we did not observe significant differences across GAIVS6 genotypes for body composition before training among whites. Part of the subjects in QFS were ascertained for obesity because two individuals in a family had to be obese for that family to be included. Therefore, the genetic background favors obesity, because subjects were selected according to the presence of obesity in the family. In contrast, although the HERITAGE cohort contained overweight and obese individuals, these subjects were volunteers, were not selected for any obesity phenotypes, and did not seem to present the genetic predisposition apparently needed for the expression of the 240-bp homozygote effect on body composition in the sedentary state. This sampling strategy allowed for collection of individuals from different genetic pools, which could be enhanced by the fact that HERITAGE subjects have been sampled from largely distinct geographical areas.
It is not clear what could be the biochemical or physiological effects
of the GAIVS6 polymorphism (a microsatellite located in intron 6).
Obviously, GAIVS6 did not induce any change in the amino acid sequence
of UCP3 protein. The UCP3 gene generates two mRNA termination variants,
producing a short (UCP3S) and a long (UCP3L)
form of the protein (14, 37). UCP3S lack the
VIth potential transmembrane domain and a large part of the putative nucleotide binding domain of UCP3. It was hypothesized that the UCP3S protein was either inactive, because of the absence
of the VIth transmembrane domain, or constitutively active, because of the absence of inhibition by GDP (18). In fact, Hinz et
al. (18) observed that UCP3S had a higher
intrinsic activity than UCP3L, whereas another study
(16) concluded that UCP3S had modestly reduced
activity compared with UCP3L. Because of its location in
intron 6 near the alternative stop codon responsible for the production
of UCP3L and UCP3S, the GAIVS6 polymorphism
could eventually modify the proportion of the two UCP3 forms and change
UCP3 activity. However, it has been reported that the splice-site
mutation IVS6+1G
A, also located in intron 6, has no apparent effect
on the uncoupling activity of UCP3 (6).
It is also possible that the effect was caused by another polymorphism
in linkage disequilibrium, with GAIVS6 located in the UCP3 promoter
region, in the coding region, or with another gene located in the same
region, e.g., UCP2. For instance, the Val/Ala
55 polymorphism of UCP2
has already been associated with exercise efficiency (7),
but this particular polymorphism, as well as the insertion/deletion in
exon 8, showed no association in HERITAGE for the body
composition-related phenotypes (data not shown). On the other
hand, Esterbauer et al. (13) reported that a
866 G/A
polymorphism in the UCP2 gene promoter contributes to obesity in the
studied population. However, the effect of this polymorphism on the
response to training had not been studied yet.
In some studies, training was shown to have an effect on UCP3
expression (31, 38, 41). Here, we reported that a UCP3 polymorphism influences the response to training. Otabe et al. (26) found that a C
T change at position
55 in the 5'
region of the UCP3 gene can reduce the benefit of physical activity in obese subjects, and Schrauwen et al. (32) reported that
this polymorphism was associated with an increased expression of UCP3 in skeletal muscle in male nondiabetic Pima Indians. In QFS, we genotyped 10 subjects for the
55 C/T UCP3 polymorphism and observed a
possible partial linkage disequilibrium with GAIVS6. This led us to
hypothesize that both polymorphisms could be related to the
responsiveness to regular exercise. Complete genotyping of the
55 C/T
variant in both QFS and HERITAGE cohorts should, therefore, be undertaken.
Studies with UCP3 knockout mice concluded that UCP3 does not seem to be required for body weight regulation, exercise tolerance, fatty acid oxidation, or cold-induced thermogenesis (15, 39). This discrepancy with our results might be explained by the fact that, in rodents, in contrast to humans, a possible decrease in muscle thermogenesis might be compensated for by the brown adipose tissue. The complete absence of expression of UCP3, as in knockout mice, could induce compensatory mechanisms in contrast to an allele with altered functions, such as results observed in the present study.
No association was found here with the V102I(C
T) and Y210Y(G
A)
markers, as was previously observed in QFS (20) and by Argyropoulos et al. (1). Allelic frequency of V102I(C
T)
was not significantly different for blacks in the HERITAGE Family Study
and the American participants in the Argyropoulos study. This
polymorphism was not detected in another white population (1) or in QFS, in which all subjects were white. However,
three related white subjects (a father and his two children) from the HERITAGE Family Study were found to be heterozygotes; they are the
first three whites reported to be carriers of this polymorphism. UCP3
effects were observed mainly among whites, with only weak linkages
among blacks. Moreover, genotypic and allelic frequencies were
different between blacks and whites.
We concluded that UCP3 could be involved in the body composition
changes in response to training because the GAIVS6 polymorphism of the
UCP3 gene has been shown to be associated with changes in BMI and SF8
in whites. Weak linkages were also found between GAIVS6 and
Y210Y(G
A) polymorphisms, with some body composition-related phenotypes and their changes with training. This supports the hypothesis that UCP3 could be involved in human body composition regulation and possibly in the control of obesity, by modulating the
response to regular exercise.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
Thanks are expressed to all investigators, research assistants, and laboratory technicians who contributed to this study. We extend our gratitude to Monique Chagnon, Chantal Paré, and Michel Lacaille for laboratory support, and Claude Leblanc and Christian Couture for database management.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Some of the results of this study were obtained with the program SAGE, whose development was supported by US Public Health Service Research Grant 1P41RR03655 from the National Center for Research Resources. Part of this work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (No. 31-54306.98) and the Swiss Institute of Sport Science.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: Y. C. Chagnon, Psychiatric Genetic Unit, Laval Univ. Robert-Giffard Research Center (CRULRG), 2601, Chemin de la Canardière, local F.6423, Beauport, Québec, Canada G1J 2G3 (E-mail: Yvon.Chagnon{at}crulrg.ulaval.ca).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
10.1152/japplphysiol.00726.2001
Received 11 July 2001; accepted in final form 8 November 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Argyropoulos, G,
Brown AM,
Willi SM,
Zhu J,
He Y,
Reitman M,
Gevao SM,
Spruill I,
and
Garvey WT.
Effects of mutations in the human uncoupling protein 3 gene on the respiratory quotient and fat oxidation in severe obesity and type 2 diabetes.
J Clin Invest
102:
1345-1351,
1998[ISI][Medline].
2.
Astrup, A,
Bulow J,
Madsen J,
and
Christensen NJ.
Contribution of BAT and skeletal muscle to thermogenesis induced by ephedrine in man.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
248:
E507-E515,
1985
3.
Behnke, AR,
and
Wilmore JH.
Evaluation and Regulation of Body Build and Composition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
4.
Boss, O,
Samec S,
Desplanches D,
Mayet MH,
Seydoux J,
Muzzin P,
and
Giacobino JP.
Effect of endurance training on mRNA expression of uncoupling proteins 1, 2, and 3 in the rat.
FASEB J
12:
335-339,
1998
5.
Bouchard, C,
Leon AS,
Rao DC,
Skinner JS,
Wilmore JH,
and
Gagnon J.
The HERITAGE family study. Aims, design, and measurement protocol.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
27:
721-729,
1995[ISI][Medline].
6.
Brown, A,
Dolan J,
Willi S,
Garvey W,
and
Argyropoulos G.
Endogenous mutations in human uncoupling protein 3 alter its functional properties.
FEBS Lett
464:
189-193,
1999[ISI][Medline].
7.
Buemann, B,
Schierning B,
Toubro S,
Bibby B,
Sorensen T,
Dalgaard L,
Pedersen O,
and
Astrup A.
The association between the val/ala-55 polymorphism of the uncoupling protein 2 gene and exercise efficiency.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
25:
467-471,
2001[ISI][Medline].
8.
Cadenas, S,
Buckingham JA,
Samec S,
Seydoux J,
Din N,
Dulloo AG,
and
Brand MD.
UCP2 and UCP3 rise in starved rat skeletal muscle but mitochondrial proton conductance is unchanged.
FEBS Lett
462:
257-260,
1999[ISI][Medline].
9.
Cassell, PG,
Saker PJ,
Huxtable SJ,
Kousta E,
Jackson AE,
Hattersley AT,
Frayling TM,
Walker M,
Kopelman PG,
Ramachandran A,
Snehelatha C,
Hitman GA,
and
McCarthy MI.
Evidence that single nucleotide polymorphism in the uncoupling protein 3 (UCP3) gene influences fat distribution in women of European and Asian origin.
Diabetologia
43:
1558-1564,
2000[ISI][Medline].
10.
Chung, W,
Luke A,
Cooper R,
Rotini C,
Vidal-Puig A,
Rosenbaum M,
Chua M,
Solanes G,
Zheng M,
Zhao L,
LeDuc C,
Eisberg A,
Chu F,
Murphy E,
Schreier M,
Aronne L,
Caprio S,
Kahle B,
Gordon D,
Leal S,
Goldsmith R,
Andreu A,
Bruno C,
DiMauro S,
Heo M,
Lowe W,
Lowell B,
Allison D,
and
Leibel R.
Genetic and physiologic analysis of the role of uncoupling protein 3 in human energy homeostasis.
Diabetes
48:
1890-1895,
1999[Abstract].
11.
Clapham, J,
Arch J,
Chapman H,
Haynes A,
Lister C,
Moore G,
Piercy V,
Carter S,
Lehner I,
Smith S,
Beeley L,
Godden R,
Herrity N,
Skehel M,
Changani K,
Hockings P,
Reid D,
Squires S,
Hatcher J,
Trail B,
Latcham J,
Rastan S,
Harper A,
Cadenas S,
Buckingham J,
Brand M,
and
Abuin A.
Mice overexpressing human uncoupling protein-3 in skeletal muscle are hyperphagic and lean.
Nature
406:
415-418,
2000[Medline].
12.
Echtay, KS,
Winkler E,
Frischmuth K,
and
Klingenberg M.
Uncoupling proteins 2 and 3 are highly active H(+) transporters and highly nucleotide sensitive when activated by coenzyme Q (ubiquinone).
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
98:
1416-1421,
2001
13.
Esterbauer, H,
Schneitler C,
Oberkofler H,
Ebenbichler C,
Paulweber B,
Sandhofer F,
Ladurner G,
Hell E,
Strosberg AD,
Patsch JR,
Krempler F,
and
Patsch W.
A common polymorphism in the promoter of UCP2 is associated with decreased risk of obesity in middle-aged humans.
Nat Genet
28:
178-183,
2001[ISI][Medline].
14.
Fleury, C,
Neverova M,
Collins S,
Raimbault S,
Champigny O,
Levi-Meyrueis C,
Bouillaud F,
Seldin MF,
Surwit RS,
Ricquier D,
and
Warden CH.
Uncoupling protein-2: a novel gene linked to obesity and hyperinsulinemia.
Nat Genet
15:
269-272,
1997[ISI][Medline].
15.
Gong, D,
Monemdjou S,
Gavrilova O,
Leon L,
Marcus-Samuels B,
Chou C,
Everett C,
Kozak L,
Li C,
Deng C,
Harper M,
and
Reitman M.
Lack of obesity and normal response to fasting and thyroid hormone in mice lacking uncoupling protein-3.
J Biol Chem
275:
16251-16257,
2000
16.
Hagen, T,
Zhang C,
Slieker L,
Chung W,
Leibel R,
and
Lowell B.
Assessment of uncoupling activity of the human uncoupling protein 3 short form and three mutants of the uncoupling protein gene using a yeast heterologous expression system.
FEBS Lett
454:
201-206,
1999[ISI][Medline].
17.
Hinz, W,
Faller B,
Gruninger S,
Gazzotti P,
and
Chiesi M.
Recombinant human uncoupling protein-3 increases thermogenesis in yeast cells.
FEBS Lett
448:
57-61,
1999[ISI][Medline].
18.
Hinz, W,
Gruninger S,
De Pover A,
and
Chiesi M.
Properties of the human long and short isoforms of the uncoupling protein-3 expressed in yeast cells.
FEBS Lett
462:
411-415,
1999[ISI][Medline].
19.
Klaus, S,
Casteilla L,
Bouillaud F,
and
Ricquier D.
The uncoupling protein UCP: a membraneous mitochondrial ion carrier exclusively expressed in brown adipose tissue.
Int J Biochem
23:
791-801,
1991[ISI][Medline].
20.
Lanouette, CM,
Giacobino JP,
Pérusse L,
Lacaille M,
Yvon C,
Chagnon M,
Kuhne F,
Bouchard C,
Muzzin P,
and
Chagnon YC.
Association between uncoupling protein 3 gene and obesity-related phenotypes in the Québec Family Study.
Mol Med
7:
433-441,
2001[ISI][Medline].
21.
Lohman, TG.
Applicability of body composition techniques and constants for children and youths.
Exerc Sport Sci Rev
14:
325-357,
1986[ISI][Medline].
22.
Mao, W,
Yu XX,
Zhong A,
Li W,
Brush J,
Sherwood SW,
Adams SH,
and
Pan G.
UCP4, a novel brain-specific mitochondrial protein that reduces membrane potential in mammalian cells.
FEBS Lett
443:
326-30,
1999[ISI][Medline]. [Corrigenda. FEBS Lett 449: April 1999, p. 293.]
23.
Meirhaeghe, A,
Amouyel P,
Helbecque N,
Cottel D,
Otabe S,
Froguel P,
and
Vasseur F.
An uncoupling protein 3 gene polymorphism associated with a lower risk of developing Type II diabetes and with atherogenic lipid profile in a French cohort.
Diabetologia
43:
1424-1428,
2000[ISI][Medline].
24.
Muzzin, P,
Boss O,
and
Giacobino J.
Uncoupling protein 3: its possible biological role and mode of regulation in rodents and humans.
J Bioenerg Biomembr
31:
467-473,
1999[ISI][Medline].
25.
Ortiz, O,
Russell M,
Daley TL,
Baumgartner RN,
Waki M,
Lichtman S,
Wang J,
Pierson RN, Jr,
and
Heymsfield SB.
Differences in skeletal muscle and bone mineral mass between black and white females and their relevance to estimates of body composition.
Am J Clin Nutr
55:
8-13,
1992
26.
Otabe, S,
Clement K,
Dina C,
Pelloux V,
Guy-Grand B,
Froguel P,
and
Vasseur F.
A genetic variation in the 5' flanking region of the UCP3 gene is associated with body mass index in humans in interaction with physical activity.
Diabetologia
43:
245-249,
2000[ISI][Medline].
27.
Pecqueur, C,
Cassard-Doulcier AM,
Raimbault S,
Miroux B,
Fleury C,
Gelly C,
Bouillaud F,
and
Ricquier D.
Functional organization of the human uncoupling protein-2 gene, and juxtaposition to the uncoupling protein-3 gene.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
255:
40-46,
1999[ISI][Medline].
28.
Pilegaard, H,
Ordway GA,
Saltin B,
and
Neufer PD.
Transcriptional regulation of gene expression in human skeletal muscle during recovery from exercise.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
279:
E806-E814,
2000
29.
SAGE.
Statistical Analysis for Genetic Epidemiology, release 2.2. New Orleans, LA: Louisiana State Univ. Medical Center, 1994.
30.
Sanchis, D,
Fleury C,
Chomiki N,
Goubern M,
Huang Q,
Neverova M,
Gregoire F,
Easlick J,
Raimbault S,
Levi-Meyrueis C,
Miroux B,
Collins S,
Seldin M,
Richard D,
Warden C,
Bouillaud F,
and
Ricquier D.
BMCP1, a novel mitochondrial carrier with high expression in the central nervous system of humans and rodents, and respiration uncoupling activity in recombinant yeast.
J Biol Chem
273:
34611-34615,
1998
31.
Schrauwen, P,
Troost F,
Xia J,
Ravussin E,
and
Saris W.
Skeletal muscle UCP2 and UCP3 expression in trained and untrained male subjects.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
23:
966-972,
1999[ISI][Medline].
32.
Schrauwen, P,
Xia J,
Walder K,
Snitker S,
and
Ravussin E.
A novel polymorphism in the proximal UCP3 promoter region: effect on skeletal muscle UCP3 mRNA expression and obesity in male nondiabetic Pima Indians.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
23:
1242-1245,
1999[ISI][Medline].
33.
Schutte, JE,
Townsend EJ,
Hugg J,
Shoup RF,
Malina RM,
and
Blomqvist CG.
Density of lean body mass is greater in blacks than in whites.
J Appl Physiol
56:
1647-1649,
1984
34.
Simonsen, L,
Stallknecht B,
and
Bulow J.
Contribution of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue to adrenaline-induced thermogenesis in man.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
17, Suppl3:
S47-S51,
1993, S68.
35.
Skinner, JS,
Wilmore KM,
Jaskolska A,
Jaskolski A,
Daw EW,
Rice T,
Gagnon J,
Leon AS,
Wilmore JH,
Rao DC,
and
Bouchard C.
Reproducibility of maximal exercise test data in the HERITAGE family study.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
31:
1623-1628,
1999[ISI][Medline].
36.
Skinner, JS,
Wilmore KM,
Krasnoff JB,
Jaskolski A,
Jaskolska A,
Gagnon J,
Province MA,
Leon AS,
Rao DC,
Wilmore JH,
and
Bouchard C.
Adaptation to a standardized training program and changes in fitness in a large, heterogeneous population: the HERITAGE Family Study.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
32:
157-161,
2000[ISI][Medline].
37.
Solanes, G,
Vidal-Puig A,
Grujic D,
Flier JS,
and
Lowell BB.
The human uncoupling protein-3 gene. Genomic structure, chromosomal localization, and genetic basis for short and long form transcripts.
J Biol Chem
272:
25433-25436,
1997
38.
Tsuboyama-Kasaoka, N,
Tsunoda N,
Maruyama K,
Takahashi M,
Kim H,
Ikemoto S,
and
Ezaki O.
Up-regulation of uncoupling protein 3 (UCP3) mRNA by exercise training and down-regulation of UCP3 by denervation in skeletal muscles.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
247:
498-503,
1998[ISI][Medline].
39.
Vidal-Puig, AJ,
Grujic D,
Zhang CY,
Hagen T,
Boss O,
Ido Y,
Szczepanik A,
Wade J,
Mootha V,
Cortright R,
Muoio DM,
and
Lowell BB.
Energy metabolism in uncoupling protein 3 gene knockout mice.
J Biol Chem
275:
16258-16266,
2000
40.
Yu, XX,
Mao W,
Zhong A,
Schow P,
Brush J,
Sherwood SW,
Adams SH,
and
Pan G.
Characterization of novel UCP5/BMCP1 isoforms and differential regulation of UCP4 and UCP5 expression through dietary or temperature manipulation.
FASEB J
14:
1611-1618,
2000
41.
Zhou, M,
Lin BZ,
Coughlin S,
Vallega G,
and
Pilch PF.
UCP-3 expression in skeletal muscle: effects of exercise, hypoxia, and AMP-activated protein kinase.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
279:
E622-E629,
2000
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-J. Liu, P.-Y. Liu, J. Long, Y. Lu, L. Elze, R. R. Recker, and H.-W. Deng Linkage and association analyses of the UCP3 gene with obesity phenotypes in Caucasian families Physiol Genomics, July 14, 2005; 22(2): 197 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. Putman, W. T. Dixon, J. A. Pearcey, I. M. MacLean, M. J. Jendral, M. Kiricsi, G. K. Murdoch, and D. Pette Chronic low-frequency stimulation upregulates uncoupling protein-3 in transforming rat fast-twitch skeletal muscle Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): R1419 - R1426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Schmitt, M. Fluck, J. Decombaz, R. Kreis, C. Boesch, M. Wittwer, F. Graber, M. Vogt, H. Howald, and H. Hoppeler Transcriptional adaptations of lipid metabolism in tibialis anterior muscle of endurance-trained athletes Physiol Genomics, October 17, 2003; 15(2): 148 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A Schonfeld-Warden and C. H Warden Reply to R Cooper and A Luke Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2003; 77(3): 752 - 753. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |