Vol. 91, Issue 6, 2531-2536, December 2001
Left ventricular wave speed
Jiun-Jr
Wang1,
Kim H.
Parker2, and
John V.
Tyberg1
1 Department of Medicine and Physiology and Biophysics,
University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1; and
2 Physiological Flow Studies Group, Department of
Bioengineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and
Medicine, London, SW7 2BY United Kingdom
 |
ABSTRACT |
Left ventricular (LV) wave speed
(LVWS) was studied experimentally and confirmed in theory.
Combining the definition of elastance (E) with the equations for the
conservation of mass and momentum shows that LVWS is proportional to
the square root of ELA, where L is long-axis
length and A is the cross-sectional area, and the density of
the blood. (We defined ELA =
, where
is
compressibility.) We studied nine open chest, anesthetized dogs, three
of which were studied during caval constriction when LV end-diastolic
pressure was
0 mmHg. The hearts were paced at ~90 beats/min, and LV
cross-sectional area was measured by using two pairs of ultrasonic
crystals; E was calculated from the LV pressure-area loop. A pulse
generator was connected to the LV apex, and LVWS was measured by using
two pressure transducers: one near the apex and the other near the base. Their distance was measured roentgenographically and compared with the diameter of a reference ball. LVWS ranged from ~1 m/s during
diastole to ~10 m/s during systole. The slope of the log c
(where c is wave speed) vs. log
was 0.546, which is in
agreement with theory (0.5). When
0, LVWS was ~1.5
m/s.
left ventricle; elastance; distensibility
 |
INTRODUCTION |
BECAUSE THE LEFT
VENTRICLE (LV) profoundly changes its elastance during the cycle
of contraction and relaxation (13), wave speed must also
change significantly. At present, there is only one report in
the literature that relates wave speed to elastance, and those
measurements were made during only a part of the cardiac cycle
(10). As we intend to study LV diastolic filling and
systolic ejection using wave-intensity analysis, we designed a protocol to measure wave speed during all phases of the cycle. Our findings are
supported by a theoretical discussion.
 |
METHODS |
Instrumentation.
The experiments were performed in nine healthy mongrel dogs weighing
between 21 and 30 kg. Dogs were anesthetized by thiopental sodium (20 mg/kg) followed by fentanyl citrate (30 µg · kg
1 · h
1) and
ventilated with a 1:1 nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture with 1.6-2% of
isoflurane. The rate of a constant-volume respirator (model 607, Harvard Apparatus, Natick, MA) (tidal volume, 15 ml/kg) was adjusted to
maintain normal blood-gas tensions and pH. Body temperature was
maintained at 37°C using a circulating-water warming blanket and a
heating lamp. An albumin-saline solution was infused through the
jugular vein to maintain the blood pressure.
A volume pulse generator was connected to the LV via a purse-string
suture at the apex (Fig. 1). It consisted
of a specially fabricated hollow cylinder with an inner diameter of 4.0 cm and volume of 153 ml, which contained a balloon that was connected to a counterpulsation pump (Datascope, Paramus, NJ). The cylinder was
filled with blood, and all bubbles were carefully removed. Two
catheter-tip manometers (SPC-482A, Millar Instruments, Houston, TX)
were introduced retrogradely into the LV via the common carotid arteries, one near the apex and the other near the base (Fig. 1), and
were referenced using their fluid-filled lumens so that absolute values
of pressure could be ascertained. The tips of the two manometers were
positioned on a straight line with the end of the nozzle, and the
distance between them was measured on the radiograph. Two pairs of
ultrasonic crystals (Sonometrics, London, Ontario) were implanted in
the LV endocardium to measure the anterior-posterior and septum-free
wall dimensions. The pericardium was then loosely sutured to
approximate the normal constraint (9). The heart rate was
controlled at ~90 beats/min by right atrial pacing. A two-channel
laboratory stimulator (model S88, Grass Medical Instruments, Quincy,
MA) was used to trigger the counterpulsation pump, which could be
adjusted to inflate and deflate the balloon (duration, ~100 ms) at
any chosen instant during the cardiac cycle. A smaller inflating volume
was chosen during systole (5 ml) than during diastole (13 ml) to
produce pressure increments of similar sizes. A pneumatic cuff (In Vivo Metric, Healdsburg, CA) was placed around the inferior vena cava (IVC).

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Experimental setup. A pulse generator, which contains a
balloon, was connected to the apex of the heart. A Lucite cylinder
(inner diameter = 4 cm; volume = 153 ml) was connected to a
thin steel tube (outer diameter = 1.27 cm), which was sutured into
the left ventricular (LV) apex (dotted lines) and filled with blood.
The balloon was connected to a counterpulsation pump. Two catheter-tip
pressure transducers were introduced in the LV via common carotid
arteries: one to the apex and the other to the base. These two
transducers were positioned on a straight line with the nozzle of the
pulse generator. Two pairs of crystals (solid dots, only one pair
shown) were implanted to measured anterior-posterior and
septum-to-free-wall diameter.
|
|
At the end of experiment, the distance between the two manometer tips
(assumed to be in the same horizontal plane) was measured from a
single-plane, cut-film radiograph taken with the use of a fluoroscope
and a metal ball of known diameter (1.90 cm) placed beside the LV as a
reference. Knowing the time interval required for the wave to travel
from one manometer to the other and the distance between them, we could
calculate wave speed.
Experimental protocol.
A series of IVC occlusions was performed to define LV elastance (see
below). The dog was then allowed to recover for 3-5 min before we
started the wave-speed measurements. The balloon could be inflated at
any instant during the cardiac cycle, which we divided into 15 phases
with respect to the marker on the pump. The experiment started by
inflating the balloon at the beginning of systole. We then moved the
inflation point to the next phase, fired the balloon, and then
proceeded to the next phase until the whole cycle had been studied.
Between each inflation, we allowed an interval of 3-5 min for recovery.
In three dogs, we reduced LV transmural diastolic pressures to negative
values before measuring wave speed. Whereas profound arterial
hypotension was avoided, the IVC was constricted until LV diastolic
pressure became negative (
1 to
5 mmHg). This protocol was the same
as that described above, except that measurements were made only during diastole.
In all experiments, we sought to achieve a quasi-steady state so that,
later, we could subtract the pressure waveform of the previous control
beat from that of the balloon inflation beat, thereby isolating the
signal due to the generated pulse (see below).
Data analysis.
After preamplification (model VR-16, Electronics to Medicine,
Honeywell, White Plains, NJ), the analog hemodynamic signals were
passed through an antialiasing, low-pass filter with a cutoff frequency
of 500 Hz and were recorded using an Intel Pentium computer with
acquisition software (Sonolab, Sonometrics, Ontario). Data were sampled
at 1,600 Hz. To determine the incremental increase in pressure due to
the pulse, the balloon inflation beat was subtracted from the
immediately preceding control beat (Fig.
2). The transmission interval could be
measured by either of two methods: 1) by shifting the base
signal to best match the apex signal and by multiplying the number of
sampling points shifted by the sampling interval, 0.625 ms, or
2) by fitting the leading edge of the pressure pulses to
straight lines and measuring the times of intersection with the
abscissa. The first method was generally adopted during diastole, and
the second method was used to increase the resolution during systolic
ejection.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The apex (A) and base (B) pressures
(P) from balloon-inflation beats (thin line) superimposed on the
respective control beats (thick line). Arrows signify the arrival of
the pressure pulse. t, Time.
|
|
Having assumed that the long-axis length remained constant, we
determined the zero-pressure intercept by the standard Suga-Sagawa method (13). The end-systolic pressure-area points
recorded during IVC occlusion were fitted to a straight line that was
extrapolated to the abscissa.
 |
THEORY |
Wave propagation in the LV is modeled by one-dimensional flow in
an elastic tube. The expression for mass conservation for incompressible blood is
|
(1)
|
where A is the cross-sectional area, U is
the average velocity across the vessel, and subscript x
indicates partial differentiation with respect to distance along the
vessel. Neglecting viscous dissipation, the momentum equation is
|
(2)
|
where P is the pressure,
is the density of the blood, and
subscript t is the partial differentiation with respect to
time. Solution of these equations relies on finding a functional
relationship between the vessel A and the local P (i.e., a
"tube law" relationship)
|
(3)
|
The ventricle is considered to be an elastic conduit
whose properties vary in time t. It is assumed that the
properties of the wall and the flow within the ventricle can be
described with a single spatial variable x, measured along
the axis of the ventricle. The instantaneous ventricular pressure,
Plv(t), is related to the instantaneous volume of the
ventricle, V(t), by the elastance, E(t)
(8)
|
(4)
|
where Plv(t) is the spatial average of the pressure
P(x,t), Vlv(t) (where Vlv is
left-ventricular volume) is the integral of
A(x,t) over the length of the ventricle
L, and Vd =
AdL
Substituting these expressions into the definition of E, we
obtain the integral relationship
|
(5)
|
where Ad is the zero-pressure intercept
and L is assumed to be a constant. However, variation of the
long axis can easily be accommodated into the theory by setting
A(x,t) = 0 over the part of the ventricle
that is obliterated during contraction. If there is homogeneity in
x (i.e., the local elastic behavior of the ventricle is the
same throughout the ventricle), then the integrand must be zero
|
(6)
|
This equation for the local P and A in terms of the
time-varying E of the ventricle provides the tube law necessary to
solve Eqs. 1 and 2. In the APPENDIX,
these equations are written in their canonical matrix form from which
the wave speed, c, can be determined by solving for the
eigenvalues of the matrix in Eq. A3
|
(7)
|
We note that, if we define the "compressibility" of the LV,
= ELA, or equivalently in terms of the measurable P
and A,
= PA/(A
Ad), then the c is simply
 |
RESULTS |
A typical result of apex-to-base transmission of the pressure
pulse is shown in Fig. 3. Wave speeds
varied over an order of magnitude from ~1 m/s during diastole to 10 m/s during systole. Figure 4 shows
measured values of wave speed in temporal relation to a pressure-area
loop of a representative cardiac cycle.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Typical example (dog 6) of wave-speed measurements from
early systole to end diastole. Left: superimposed apical LV
pressures from the control and balloon inflation beats (pressures from
the base not shown). The pressure of the control beat was subtracted
from that of the balloon inflation beat to identify the signal due to
the pressure pulse. Arrows indicate the beginning of the pulse.
Right: these differences [change in pressure ( P)] from
the apex (A) and base (B) are shown, plotted on the common time scale.
The 2 numbers in each plot represent the transmission interval
( t; ms) and the calculated wave speed (c;
m/s), given that the separation between the pressure transducers was
23.6 mm in this experiment. (In the second plot, the upstrokes were
fitted using linear regression to improve temporal resolution.)
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
To show the conceptual relation of wave speed to LV
elastance (and therefore compressibility), we have plotted the wave
speed measurements from dog 6 on a representative
pressure-area (A) loop. Zero-pressure intercept
(Ad) for this experiment was determined to
be 10 cm2.
|
|
Figure 5 shows the log-log plots of wave
speeds vs. compressibility for the six experiments in which the whole
cardiac cycle was studied. The slope of the linear regression line for
each dog represents the power relationship between wave speed and
compressibility from the experiments ranging from 0.43 to 0.70. Pooled
data are shown in Fig. 6; the regression
line for the combined data yields c = 0.974
0.546, which matches well with the theory
c =
= 0.976
0.5, where
is 1,050 kg/m3 (5).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Log c vs. log compressibility ( ) for
the 6 experiments in which the whole cardiac cycle was studied. The
slope of the best fit line determined by least squares regression for
each experiment is indicated at the right of each regression
line. The theoretical value is 0.5, and experimental values range from
0.43 to 0.70.
|
|

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Log c vs. log for pooled data
from 6 experiments. The regression line for the pooled data yields
c = 0.974 0.546.
|
|
The pooled data from the negative-elastance experiments are plotted in
Fig. 7 on an expanded linear scale. The
regression line for the positive data is the one determined in Fig. 6.
The average wave speed during periods when compressibility was negative was 1.34 m/s.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Average wave speed during periods when the elastance was
negative is 1.34 m/s (pooled data from 3 dogs). For between 2,000
and 2,000 Pa, the c is effectively constant.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
One advantage of wave-intensity analysis is that it can separate
the upstream and downstream events using the pressure (dP) and velocity
changes (dU) measured at a single point in the artery (6, 7, 14). With the assumption that they are additive, the dP caused by the forward and backward traveling waves can be
calculated by dP± = 1/2(dP ±
cdU) and the velocity changes by
dU± = ±1/2(dP/
c ± dU), where + and
signify the forward and
backward waves, respectively. The power (W/m2) carried by
the forward and backward waves is measured by their wave intensities,
which can be calculated by 1/4
c(dP +
cdU)2 and
1/4
c(dP
cdU)2,
respectively. Note, however, that these calculations require knowledge
of the wave speed.
A wave is the result of interaction between inertial and
restoring forces. When wave propagation in the LV is considered, the
restoring force is due to chamber elastance, which varies continuously
through the cardiac cycle. The theory shows that the square of wave
speed is linearly proportional to ELA (i.e., compressibility), not elastance itself, as suggested by Shishido et al.
(10). Their conclusion resulted from measurements done exclusively during isovolumic conditions when the cross-sectional area
changes little. During periods in the cardiac cycle when cross-sectional area is constant, the two expressions are equivalent.
In principle, measurements of wave speed are affected by the convection
of blood during systolic ejection and diastolic filling. In our
experiments in which the generated pulse was propagating from the apex
to the base, the measured value in systole is the wave speed plus the
flow speed, and, in diastole, it is the wave speed minus the flow
speed. The peak systolic flow in the outflow tract is ~1 m/s, which
is less than one-tenth the measured systolic wave speed. In diastole,
the convection due to the elastance and cross-sectional area filling
waves may be more important because their peak magnitudes (~0.4 m/s)
may be approximately one-half that of the measured wave speed. The
convection correction in diastole, which increases the value of wave
speed, compounded with the smaller correction in systole, which
decreases the value of wave speed, tend to reduce the measured slope in
the log-log plots in Figs. 5 and 6 by raising the low values and
lowering the high values of wave speed. Thus correction for convection could bring the measured exponent 0.546 even closer to the theoretical value of 0.5.
During diastolic filling, LV pressure sometimes falls below zero. The
simple theory above predicts that negative LV pressure yields a
negative elastance and an imaginary wave speed, which is not
reasonable. When the transmural pressure changes from positive to
negative, compression stress and bending moments may be induced with
effects on wave speed that cannot be predicted from the simple theory;
therefore, when elastance is negative, wave speed has to be determined
experimentally. We have found that wave speeds are consistently similar
at near-zero positive and negative values of elastance.
There are limitations to this model. The shape of the LV lumen is
approximately that of a hemiellipsoid, surrounded by several muscle
layers arranged in different directions. The LV wall is mostly
muscular, but some of the septum is membranous. Only the upper
one-third of the septum is smooth and membranous, but the remainder of
the inner LV wall is ridged by muscles, the trabeculae carneae. The
wall is also thinner at the apex than the base (12). This
complicated structure, however, has been simulated by using one-dimensional models with respect to the systolic ejection
(15) and isovolumic contraction (10) periods.
Using an in vitro model, Steen and Steen (11) determined
that blood moves simultaneously as a flow column during early mitral filling.
The wave in the LV was assumed to travel as a plane, where the
velocity is averaged across the cross-sectional area. By applying the
tube law, no assumption of a uniform cross-sectional area is required,
although we assumed that the long axis remained constant. We have
assumed homogeneous time-varying compressibility, but this might not be
true near the apex. The assumption might be improved by incorporating
more complicated location-dependent properties, which might
include time-varying activation from the central left of the
septum, the high anterior and apical posterior paraseptal areas
(1, 2, 4).
The assumption of homogeneous time-varying compressibility implies that
each part of the LV is mechanically activated simultaneously. During
systole, ~2 ms were required for the wave to travel from one pressure
transducer to the other, and, during diastole, 16 ms were required.
These times are to be compared with the ~12 ms required for complete
electrical activation (2, 3) and 22 ms for mechanical
activation (4). As compressibility can be assumed to be
relatively constant during diastole and as the transit time during
systole was relatively small, potential effects of compressibility
changing during the interval of wave transit can be ignored.
We conclude that the wave speed in the LV depends only on the
instantaneous compressibility, which can be expressed in terms of the
instantaneous elastance and volume of the ventricle. Our experiments
showed that this relationship holds very well over the whole of the
cardiac cycle during which the elastance of the ventricle varies by
nearly two orders of magnitude. In the canine LV, we found
c = 0.974
0.546 m/s, where
=
ELA, except when
is negative, when the wave speed
is approximately constant with c = 1.34 m/s.
 |
APPENDIX |
The relationship of cross-sectional area, local pressure, and
the elastance can be stated as (Eq. 6)
Differentiating, we obtain the differential relationships
between the local area and the pressure and area
where Et = dE/dt is an
ordinary differential, because of the assumption of uniform elastance.
Substituting these relationships, the mass conservation equation can be
written in terms of P and U
|
(A1)
|
The mass (Eq. A1) and momentum (Eq. 2)
equations can be written in the canonical matrix form
This system of equations is hyperbolic and can be solved using
the method of characteristics. The eigenvalues of the matrix found from
the characteristic equation
are
= U ± c, where
c is defined as
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We acknowledge the excellent technical support provided by Cheryl
Meek, Rozsa Sas, and Gerald Groves.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
J. V. Tyberg is a Medical Scientist of the Alberta Heritage
Foundation for Medical Research (Edmonton). The study was supported by
a grant-in-aid from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Alberta (Calgary) to J. V. Tyberg.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. V. Tyberg, Professor of Medicine and Physiology and Biophysics, Univ.
of Calgary Health Science Centre, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary,
Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1 (E-mail: jtyberg{at}ucalgary.ca).
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 25 June 2001; accepted in final form 14 August 2001.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Durrer, D,
Roos JP,
and
Buller J.
The spread of excitation in canine and human hearts.
In: Electrophysiology of the Heart, edited by Traccardi B,
and Marchetti G.. New York: Pergamon, 1965.
2.
Durrer, D,
VanDam RT,
Freud GE,
Janse MJ,
Meijler FL,
and
Arzbaecher RC.
Total excitation of the isolated human heart.
Circulation
41:
899-912,
1970[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3.
Fisch, C.
Electrocardiography.
In: Heart Disease: a Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine (5th ed.), edited by Braunwld E.. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1997, chapt. 4, p. 108-152.
4.
Hotta, S.
The sequence of mechanical activation of the ventricle.
Jpn Circ J
31:
1568-1572,
1967[Medline].
5.
McDonald, DA.
Blood Flow in Arteries. London: Arnold, 1974, p. 259.
6.
Parker, KH,
and
Jones CJH
Forward and backward running waves in the arteries: analysis using the method of characteristics.
J Biomech Eng
112:
322-326,
1990[Web of Science][Medline].
7.
Parker, KH,
Jones CJH,
Dawson JR,
and
Gibson DG.
What stops the flow of blood from the heart?
Heart Vessels
4:
241-245,
1988[Medline].
8.
Sagawa, K.
The ventricular pressure-volume diagram revisited.
Circ Res
43:
677-687,
1978[Free Full Text].
9.
Scott-Douglas, NW,
Traboulsi M,
Smith ER,
and
Tyberg JV.
Experimental instrumentation and left ventricular pressure-strain relationship.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
261:
H1693-H1697,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10.
Shishido, T,
Sugimachi M,
Kawaguchi O,
Miyano H,
Kawada T,
Matsuura W,
Ikeda Y,
and
Sunagawa K.
Novel method to estimate ventricular contractility using intraventricular pulse wave velocity.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
277:
H2409-H2415,
1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11.
Steen, T,
and
Steen S.
Filling of a model left ventricle studied by colour M mode Doppler.
Cardiovasc Res
28:
1821-1827,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12.
Streeter, DD.
Gross morphology and fiber geometry of the heart.
In: Handbook of Physiology. The Cardiovascular System. The Heart. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc, 1979, sect. 2, vol. I, chapt. 4, p. 61-112.
13.
Suga, H,
and
Sagawa K.
Instantaneous pressure-volume relationships and their ratio in the excised, supported canine left ventricle.
Circ Res
35:
117-126,
1974[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14.
Sun, YH,
Anderson TJ,
Parker KH,
and
Tyberg JV.
Wave-intensity analysis: a new approach to coronary dynamics.
J Appl Physiol
89:
1636-1644,
2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15.
Verdonck, P,
Vierendeels J,
Riemslagh K,
and
Dick E.
Left-ventricular pressure gradients: a computer-model simulation.
Med Biol Eng Comput
37:
511-516,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
J APPL PHYSIOL 91(6):2531-2536
8750-7587/01 $5.00
Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society