|
|
||||||||
1 Human Adaptation and Countermeasures Office, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston 77058; 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555; and 3 Astronaut Office, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas 77058
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This minireview provides an overview of known and potential gender differences in physiological responses to spaceflight. The paper covers cardiovascular and exercise physiology, barophysiology and decompression sickness, renal stone risk, immunology, neurovestibular and sensorimotor function, nutrition, pharmacotherapeutics, and reproduction. Potential health and functional impacts associated with the various physiological changes during spaceflight are discussed, and areas needing additional research are highlighted. Historically, studies of physiological responses to microgravity have not been aimed at examining gender-specific differences in the astronaut population. Insufficient data exist in most of the discipline areas at this time to draw valid conclusions about gender-specific differences in astronauts, in part due to the small ratio of women to men. The only astronaut health issue for which a large enough data set exists to allow valid conclusions to be drawn about gender differences is orthostatic intolerance following shuttle missions, in which women have a significantly higher incidence of presyncope during stand tests than do men. The most common observation across disciplines is that individual differences in physiological responses within genders are usually as large as, or larger than, differences between genders. Individual characteristics usually outweigh gender differences per se.
physiological responses; health issues
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THIS MINIREVIEW PROVIDES a summary of gender-specific physiological changes and health issues in astronauts. It is derived from a special task-force report prepared by discipline experts to aid management in policy decisions and selection of research needed to understand gender differences in responses to spaceflight. Historically, investigations of physiological responses to microgravity have not been aimed at examining gender-specific differences in the astronaut population. Many of the discipline experts, however, identified one or more potential gender-specific physiological differences.
| |
CARDIOVASCULAR PHYSIOLOGY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Orthostatic intolerance.
There is a gender-related difference in the occurrence of postflight
orthostatic intolerance (presyncope during a stand or tilt test) after
space shuttle missions (Fig. 1).
Presyncope is defined as a sudden dip in systolic blood
pressure of >25 mmHg or in diastolic blood pressure of >15 mmHg, a
sudden and sustained drop in heart rate >15 beats/min, an absolute
heart rate <40 beats/min for those whose resting absolute heart rates
were >50 beats/min, and absolute systolic blood pressure of <70 mmHg.
In both the database of experimental results and the database of
routine postflight medical tests, women had a much greater incidence of
presyncope during the postflight stand test (21).
Generally, women have lower blood pressure and peripheral vascular
resistance and higher heart rates than men. In addition, women respond
to cardiovascular stress with greater heart rate increases, whereas men
respond primarily with greater increases in vascular resistance. In a previous study designed to examine postflight orthostatic intolerance, the presyncopal astronauts (5 women and 3 men) were found to have greater increases in heart rate, greater decrease in blood pressure, and less of an increase in peripheral resistance in response to the
postflight stand test than their nonpresyncopal counterparts (2 women and 19 men). It was suggested that indirect vasodilatory effects
of estrogen in premenopausal women may contribute to smaller vasoconstrictive responses in women compared with men during
orthostatic stress (21).
|
Ventricular dysrhythmias. New data suggest that cardiac dysrhythmias may be of greater concern during long-duration than short-duration spaceflight (20). We know of no data from in-flight cardiovascular (Holter) monitoring of women on either shuttle or Mir missions. However, there have been several reports of ventricular dysrhythmias in men. In the general population, men in this age group have a greater risk of ventricular dysrhythmias than women. It would, therefore, be expected that in the astronaut population this would hold true as well (30, 34).
| |
EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At the present time, 22% of the active astronaut corps are women
(35 of 158) (see Table 1). The average
female astronaut is 42 yr old (43 yr for men) and weighs 60.7 kg (81.2 kg for men). In general, the average woman is 10 cm shorter and 13 kg
lighter and has 11% more body fat, 8% less muscle mass, 10-14%
less hemoglobin mass, and a lower level of aerobic fitness
(37) than her male counterpart. These gender differences
can be expected to influence exercise capacity and thus the ability to
perform specific tasks during spaceflight.
|
Aerobic fitness.
The average aerobic fitness, expressed as the maximal oxygen uptake
(
O2 max), of adult women is 2.0 l/min,
compared with 3.5 l/min for men. When adjusted for differences in body weight, the average
O2 max for women is
40 vs. 50 ml · kg
1 · min
1
for men (37). These differences can be reduced still
further (to 54 vs. 59 ml · kg
1 · min
1) when the
results are normalized for lean body mass and disappear completely when
results are normalized for lean body mass and for gender differences in
total body hemoglobin. Thus, for any task requiring a given absolute
oxygen uptake, the average woman is working at a higher percentage of
her exercise capacity than the average man. This would result in a
higher heart rate, higher body temperature, greater stress, and a
quicker onset of fatigue during the exercise. These more severe
exercise responses may result in a greater number of injuries and less
tolerance for a stressful environment. For example, in a study of 124 men and 186 women during basic combat training, the women had a 51%
injury rate compared with 27% for the men (27).
O2 peak) of 2.19 l/min or 36 ml · kg
1 · min
1 (see Table
1) when normalized for body weight (3.55 l/min and 44.2 ml · kg
1 · min
1 for men).
These
O2 peak values probably
underestimate fitness, however, because the clinical treadmill test
used to evaluate astronauts is stopped when subjects reach 85% of
their age-predicted maximal heart rate. Actual aerobic capacity is
probably ~15% higher than reported, which would increase average
female fitness to ~2.5 l/min, or a "very good" fitness for their
age, and increase the male value to 4.1 l/min, or an "excellent"
level of aerobic fitness (54).
At this time, there is not sufficient data to compare the degree of
aerobic deconditioning after spaceflight between men and women.
However, in response to bed rest, the relative changes in aerobic
capacity are similar between men and women (9), despite
the marked differences in absolute values.
Strength. There are obvious strength differences between the average man and the average woman. Body strength of the adult woman is about two-thirds that of the adult man. Upper body strength of the woman is ~50% that of the man, whereas lower-body strength is ~70% (37).
Few data exist concerning strength changes in women after spaceflight or bed rest. Regional decreases in muscle volume were similar in two men and two women after 8 days of spaceflight (31). Some reports, however, indicate that women have a greater percentage of slow-twitch muscle fibers than men (40). Slow-twitch muscle fibers appear to be more affected by spaceflight than the fast-twitch fibers (14). If this is the case, then women may be more susceptible to changes in muscle mass and endurance. This hypothesis has yet to be tested. In response to strength training, women and men have a similar proportional increase in lean body mass and strength, yet the total muscle girth of the women is less (37). These consistent differences in muscle mass of men and women are believed to be attributable to the anabolic effect of the 20- to 30-fold greater concentration of testosterone in men.Performance of extravehicular activity.
The 50% less upper body strength of the average woman would put her at
a disadvantage in performing vigorous upper body work, such as certain
extravehicular activity (EVA) tasks. Upper body exercise elicits a
O2 peak that is ~70% of the whole body
O2 max. In addition, upper body
exercise is generally more stressful than lower-body exercise at a
given power output, having a greater oxygen cost and producing a higher
heart rate and blood pressure response (51). The average
metabolic cost to crewmembers of EVA in the pressurized U.S. EVA suit
is ~0.8 l/min (62), and the metabolic cost with the
Russian EVA suit is ~40% greater (3). Therefore, for
the average female astronaut, EVA work in the U.S. suit would represent
approximately a 44% aerobic intensity (0.8/1.8 l/min upper body
O2 peak), and this work would have to
be sustained for up to 6-8 h. (This is assuming that her upper
body aerobic capacity is 70% of 2.5 l/min
O2 max and that no deconditioning has
occurred during the flight.) Women, with less upper body strength and a lower
O2 max, may be more susceptible
to fatigue and risk of injury from muscle strains. Careful selection of
the crewmembers for given EVA tasks with appropriate task planning and
selection of tools are necessary to minimize fatigue during EVA.
Emergency egress. During emergency egress, rapid ambulation while wearing the launch and entry suit (LES) requires a high level of aerobic capacity and leg muscle strength. The LES consists of an outer water-impermeable shell, a liquid cooling garment, and an inflatable antigravity garment to protect against orthostatic intolerance. In ground-based simulations of walking in the 26-kg LES, the average metabolic cost for 12 men was 2.0 l/min without G-suit inflation, increasing to 2.5 l/min with the G-suit inflated to 1.5 psi (7). Four of twelve men could not complete the 5-min walk, even without the deconditioning effect of spaceflight. Leg fatigue was considered to be at least part of the reason for their failure, since all the men could complete the task without G-suit inflation. Because of their smaller body weight, lower absolute aerobic capacity, and weaker leg strength, women may be at greater risk of failure while performing an emergency egress, although this is yet to be tested.
| |
BAROPHYSIOLOGY AND DECOMPRESSION SICKNESS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Decompression sickness (DCS) results from the formation of a gas phase in body tissues after a change of pressure. The magnitude of the problem depends on the degree of exposure, usually measured as the magnitude of the pressure change, and the type of tissue in which gas bubbles form. The greatest pressure changes result in the largest volume of separated gas phase, and nerve tissue is the locus of the most severe problems. Death is the worst possible outcome and has occurred in numerous unfortunate cases over the 150 years that pressure has been used in an occupational setting (5). Historically, most cases have arisen in deep-sea diving and tunnel work where compressed air was employed, but numerous events have occurred in aviation. Mitigation of DCS is critical for the safety of both men and women astronauts performing EVA. Fortunately, no incidences of DCS have been associated with the 62 EVAs to date, 7 of which were performed by women astronauts.
It is important to avoid the occurrence of DCS as much as possible while at the same time use the fewest consumables and shortest oxygen prebreathe duration commensurate with efficacy. To accomplish this, it is necessary to understand the physiological and biophysical processes involved and any gender differences that may be present.
Gender differences in DCS have been identified and related to such characteristics as thermal stability, upper body strength, and characteristics of the reproductive system, but many of these play a role only in deep-sea and scuba diving (8). Data do not indicate that women are at increased risk for hypobaric DCS. Our primary concern for women crewmembers performing EVA is the potential for increased risk of DCS during menses, as it has been shown that the incidence of DCS is greatest then (8). This might be related to tissue fluid shifts affecting gas uptake and elimination. Because calcium loss increases in microgravity, the possibility of a gender-specific increased risk of dysbaric osteonecrosis should be investigated.
Gender differences in DCS risk are of considerable importance in the space program, and further ground-based research is needed to understand the risk factors. In the spaceflight environment, reduced stress on the musculoskeletal system may play a role in the risk of DCS, and this can be modeled with some degree of fidelity in the laboratory.
| |
BONE MINERAL DENSITY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bone mineral density (BMD) losses of women during 17 wk of bed rest (n = 6) and during 4-6 mo of spaceflight (n = 2) have been similar to bone losses of men (23). Recovery of BMD after spaceflight has not been complete in all crewmembers. If this trend of failure to recover bone continues, then crewmembers could be at greater risk for osteoporotic fracture as they age. Due to gender differences in longevity and in rate of bone loss during their 40s and 50s, women are at greater risk for fracture with aging. BMD losses that are not recovered after spaceflight can lower the age at which astronauts are at high risk for fracture as bone loss occurs with aging. Because of gender differences, a larger percentage of women than men are expected, during their projected lifetime, to be in a high-risk category due to spaceflight sequelae.
One of the countermeasures tested in bed rest was intense resistive exercise. The countermeasure has been fully successful in preventing bone loss in the calcaneus and increasing spinal BMD of the five men and four women tested. The femoral trochanter exhibited losses that appeared to be biomechanically influenced. There were no gender-related differences in the BMD response to 17 wk of bed rest with resistive exercise. In addition, there were no differences in one-repetition-maximum strength gains between the two groups. However, the upper-extremity strength (bench press) of the women was less than that of the men initially; therefore, the bench press gains were a larger percentage of the initial value for the women.
Overall, the skeletal response to spaceflight, bed rest, and bed rest with resistive exercise has shown no differences related to gender.
| |
RENAL STONE FORMATION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Renal stone disease is a common medical problem for both men and women, affecting 1-5% of the population throughout the world. Men suffer from calcium-containing stones more than twice as often as women. Differences in urinary chemistry may account for this discrepancy, due to the greater urinary excretion of calcium, oxalate, and uric acid by men (46). However, women are at increased risk of forming struvite stones (magnesium ammonium phosphate) because of urinary tract infections.
The formation of a renal stone is probably the result of a combination of epidemiological and multiple urinary abnormalities. Men 30-50 yr of age are most affected by renal stones, whereas women in their 30s are most affected, with a second peak of stone formation between the ages of 50 and 55, corresponding to the postmenopausal increase in urinary calcium (46). This age range also represents the prime spaceflight years for astronauts. Occupation and environment may influence renal stone development, as shown by a higher incidence rate in hot, humid environments. These factors may negatively impact the risk of renal stone formation during spaceflight in the humid shuttle or International Space Station environment, especially during EVAs. Diet also plays a role in the risk of stone development. Diets high in protein, calcium, oxalate, and sodium increase the urinary concentration of the stone-forming salts and promote the development of renal stones. In-flight shuttle foods are high in sodium, and increased sodium intake has been linked to augmented calcium excretion (61). In a normal non-stone-forming population, urine volume may be the most critical variable in reducing renal stone formation in both men and women. Decreased dietary fluid intake results in smaller urine volume, increasing the concentration of the stone-forming salts.
Data collected from female astronauts (n = 37) in
NASA's renal stone risk assessment program have shown trends that are
similar to data from male astronauts (Table
2). Postflight shuttle data have shown
increased urinary calcium excretion by women after flight, although to
a lesser degree than by male astronauts, and decreased urinary volume
and citrate values. The postflight renal stone risk indexes for female
astronauts show higher risks than the preflight indexes, but the risks
are not as great as those for male astronauts. Overall, there is no
evidence for gender-specific risks for renal stone formation during
spaceflight. Both men and women are at increased risk for stones, and,
although the types of stones may differ, individual differences
significantly outweigh gender effects. In addition, the data described
here may not reflect the urinary chemistry during flight and may be
influenced by the readaptation to gravity after landing.
|
NASA astronauts have experienced 14 renal stone episodes, including multiple events experienced by one female crewmember. The increased risk of renal stone formation resulting from exposure to microgravity may be further exacerbated during long-duration stays on the International Space Station or a mission to Mars. The risks of forming a stone are great enough to warrant additional investigation.
The risk of urinary calculus formation has been shown to be associated with identified variables of calcium metabolism (absorption, excretion, and so forth). The potential change in stone risk in perimenopausal women exposed to long-duration spaceflight, due to hormone-induced changes in bone mineral metabolism, is not known. Studies of differences in muscle mass, gravitational loading of bone, calcium kinetics, and urinary calculus formation risk in perimenopausal or older female astronauts need to be performed collaboratively during extended-duration spaceflight.
| |
IMMUNOLOGY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alterations in the immune system have been shown to occur along with the physiological changes associated with spaceflight (32, 59). Altered white blood cell subpopulations, decreased proliferation of immune cells, and altered production of immunoregulatory molecules have been documented immediately after landing. Other studies have demonstrated a reduced in vivo cell-mediated immunity during spaceflight. Overall, these data suggest that a dysregulation of the immune system occurs in some individuals and that these changes may increase the risks of infection, increase the reactivation of latent viruses, and potentially alter immune surveillance and the incidence of autoimmune disease or tumorigenesis. As the space program moves to longer missions on the International Space Station and exploration missions, the importance of the observed immune system changes will increase dramatically. Further assessment of immune status will be required to determine whether the changes observed present significantly altered risks to the spacecraft crew.
At present, there is no indication that spaceflight alters the immune system in a gender-specific manner, although the small number of female subjects evaluated makes such an analysis difficult. Gender-specific differences in immune responses have been documented in a variety of clinical situations. Women express a generally elevated immune response and a higher incidence of autoimmune disease compared with men. Differences in cytokine balance and immune responses are also observed during the menstrual cycle, which can have a clinically significant impact on expression of disease (e.g., asthma) (1). Further analysis of gender differences correlating rigorous immune tests and validated clinical outcomes must be carried out in ground-based investigations before detailed analysis of in-flight gender-based responses can be performed.
| |
NEUROVESTIBULAR AND SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The major areas of concern with regard to spaceflight effects on neurovestibular and sensorimotor function are posture and locomotor control, gaze stabilization, spatial orientation, space motion sickness (SMS), and vestibular influence on cardiovascular control mechanisms. Disturbances in neurovestibular and sensorimotor function can result in degraded performance of operational tasks on orbit, inability to perform emergency egress, and impairments in performing normal daily activities for varying periods after landing. The magnitude of these disturbances increases as a function of flight duration. Hence, for long-duration missions, changes in neurovestibular and sensorimotor functions may pose health concerns for an extended period after landing. Data from Russian studies indicate that some of the changes may be permanent, although this has not been confirmed, nor has their functional significance been determined (I. Koslovskya, personal communication).
In general, large individual differences in gaze, posture and locomotor control, spatial orientation, and SMS have been observed during flight and when comparing pre- and postflight data. These differences can be attributed to a number of factors, including differences in control strategies, adaptation rates, training and experience (as for pilots vs. mission specialists), perceptual styles, and gender (13, 35, 49, 53). For most of the areas of concern in this discipline, the number of women astronauts studied to date is far too small and the number of factors contributing to individual differences is too large to draw valid conclusions about gender-specific differences.
With only a few exceptions, the ground-based scientific and medical literature offers no evidence that significant or functionally important gender-specific differences exist in neurovestibular and sensorimotor functions. Reports in the literature suggest gender differences do exist in cognitive performance and visual spatial abilities. However, these are highly controversial and the results are equivocal. Even in studies in which such gender differences have been found, they account for a very small percentage of the variance in the population (33). Finally, some reports in the literature suggest that women are somewhat more susceptible to motion sickness than men. However, these reports indicate that gender differences in susceptibility to motion sickness may be more a function of the type of provocative stimulus than of gender per se. Earlier published reports on gender differences in SMS showed that the incidence in women was 38% compared with 70% in men (10), which would suggest that female astronauts are less susceptible to SMS than their male counterparts. However, a more recent report indicates that male and female astronauts are equally affected by SMS (26).
| |
NUTRITION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The nutritional requirements for spaceflight (29, 42) have been based on interpretation of findings from actual spaceflight and weightlessness analog studies and on extrapolation of extensive terrestrial nutrition information (38, 39, 43). Little information is available regarding nutrient requirements during spaceflight, and even less is available regarding gender differences in requirements. Whereas energy requirements are based on both gender and body size, only a few examples of gender-specific nutrient issues exist.
Iron. In Earth-based populations, clear gender differences exist with regard to iron metabolism and requirements. Specifically, because of menstrual blood loss, women have a higher dietary iron requirement than men. Iron metabolism and hematology are altered in men and women during weightlessness, when the circulating red blood cell mass is decreased 10-15% compared with preflight values (2). This reduction in red blood cell mass occurs despite adequate iron stores and tissue iron availability. Iron overload is a concern for extended-duration spaceflight, based on the concept that iron is an oxidant and might damage tissue (17, 24, 41), either alone or in conjunction with radiation exposure. Women may actually be at less risk of iron overload than men because they typically have lower iron stores than men. The dietary iron requirements for spaceflight have been defined as <10 mg/day for both men and women, in the interest of avoiding iron excess. Unfortunately, no data exist on flight gender differences in iron metabolism or on dietary iron absorption by men or women during spaceflight.
Calcium. Bone loss, calcium homeostasis, and osteoporosis are obvious nutrition-related concerns for women's health on Earth as well as during spaceflight. Unfortunately, few or no data exist regarding gender differences in bone and calcium metabolism during flight. A calcium kinetics experiment has been flown on some Mir flights (55), albeit with male subjects only. Additional data is needed for both male and female subjects to provide information about changes in calcium metabolism during the first days of weightlessness.
| |
PHARMACOTHERAPEUTICS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gender-related differences are known to exist with respect to clinical efficacy and adverse effects of drug treatment (60). There is a general consensus among clinical pharmacologists that pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in women are different from those in men (64). Gender differences in gastrointestinal physiology and hepatic metabolism may contribute to differences in drug dynamics. In addition, hormonal changes during the menstrual cycle, renal blood flow, and body composition also play roles in gender-specific drug disposition (4). These gender-related physiological differences could greatly impact the therapeutic efficacy of drugs on Earth and in space. Currently, very little is known about pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in space. Understanding discrete gender differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs is important for pharmacotherapeutics in space, particularly for long-duration missions, which will probably present a greater variety of conditions requiring pharmacotherapy than short-duration missions.
Gastrointestinal physiology and hepatic metabolism. Gender differences in gastrointestinal physiology and hepatic metabolizing enzyme systems may adversely affect drug absorption, bioavailability, metabolism, and elimination in women. Women have altered bile composition, slower intestinal transit time, and higher gastric pH than men (16). During the first few days of spaceflight, there is a high incidence of SMS accompanied by decreased gastrointestinal motility (10). The combination of initial slower intestinal transit time and decreased gastrointestinal motility associated with SMS may adversely affect absorption and bioavailability of orally ingested medications more in female than in male astronauts. Clinically significant gender differences have been reported for drug elimination processes; these were predominantly linked to the gender-specific expression of metabolic enzyme systems (4). Differences between men and women in hepatic phase I and phase II metabolism have an important influence on drug metabolism. Men have higher levels of certain metabolizing enzyme isoforms, whereas women have higher activity levels of different isoforms (4). These differences in drug metabolism may partially account for the higher incidence of adverse reactions to drugs in women than in men.
Hormonal changes. Menstrual cycle hormonal changes can also influence drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (28), and oral contraceptive use can interfere with the metabolism of many drugs (25). Due to the absolute preclusion of pregnancy in space, many female astronauts choose oral contraceptives during the training period, and most continue to use them while on orbit. Changes in the renal, cardiovascular, hematological, and immune systems during menstruation are well known, and these physiological changes could influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs by altering such variables as protein binding and volume of distribution of drugs, which could significantly worsen disease severity.
The gender differences in physiology described above could greatly impact the therapeutic efficacy of drugs. Moreover, the manifestation of physiological adaptations to spaceflight would most likely exacerbate these gender-related differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications used during spaceflight, which will affect therapeutics in space. Therefore, space pharmacotherapeutic research must focus on understanding how gender differences in physiological adaptation to microgravity affect pharmacotherapy in space and on whether significant advantages would accrue to implementing gender-specific pharmacotherapeutic protocols for treatment of medical conditions in space.| |
REPRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several reproductive medical issues that pertain to astronauts warrant further clinical investigation, including the following: 1) the effect of spaceflight on normal menstrual functioning, 2) the role of gravity in menstrual efflux and retrograde (intra-abdominal) menstruation, and 3) the effect of space radiation on the future childbearing capacity of both men and women.
Normal menstrual function. Because space shuttle flights are considerably shorter than the average menstrual cycle length, no on-orbit studies have been done to determine the impact of microgravity on normal hypothalamic/pituitary/ovarian axis function. The primary concern is that anovulation might occur, resulting in continuous estrogen exposure, endometrial hyperplasia, and possibly menorrhagia. Second, there is some concern that hypothalamic amenorrhea and reduced estrogen levels could occur. The reason for concern is that the exercise necessary for long-term cardiovascular and musculoskeletal fitness may be strenuous enough to cause hypothalamic-induced hypogonadism with reduced serum estrogen levels. The combined effect of hypoestrogenemia and spaceflight-related calcium loss could lead to increased osteoporosis risk (13, 35, 49, 53). Were this to occur, oral contraceptive or hormone replacement therapy has been shown to control the risk. An additional advantage of hormonal therapy is the ability to eliminate menstruation altogether.
Menstrual efflux and retrograde menstruation. Many women normally experience some retrograde intra-abdominal bleeding during menses. Because of the effects of gravity, the blood products and cellular debris usually stay confined to the pelvis. The development of endometriosis is multifaceted, but exposure of the pelvic peritoneum to menstrual blood products is thought to be the primary cause of its development (36, 50, 52, 56, 63). Endometriosis is also primarily a pelvic problem in part because gravity keeps the menstrual products confined to the pelvis. Although medical debriefing data from shuttle flights have not supported concern that retrograde menstruation increases during spaceflight, the role of gravity in menstruation should be investigated to determine whether retrograde menstruation is increased and how peritoneal fluid is distributed. In addition, radiation exposure at varying doses has been associated with the development of endometriosis in certain primate species (15, 63). It will be prudent to follow female crewmembers longitudinally to determine whether spaceflight changes the incidence, location, or severity of endometriosis.
Effect of space radiation. Radiation concerns for women and men are generally similar except for exposure of the gonads and breast and thyroid tissue. Although the radiation exposure levels found in long-duration spaceflight may present an infertility problem for men, this is not likely for the more radiation-resistant ovary (57). However, the effect of space-based radiation on the chromosomes of oocytes is of considerable importance to women who may desire future pregnancies. Compared with women, men are at considerably increased short-term risk from damage to gametes. However, the effect of neutrons, high-energy particles, and other radiation from space needs to be assessed for both men and women on prolonged missions so that they can make informed decisions regarding cryopreservation of gametes before flight. The participation of women in spaceflight piques the interest of the public in issues relating to pregnancy and fertility in space. However, the radiation levels associated with spaceflight in low Earth orbit or deep space preclude pregnancies at this time. The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements guidelines limit radiation exposure to 500 mrem for an entire pregnancy and to only 50 mrem per month. The International Commission on Radiological Protection guidelines are more restrictive. On the International Space Station, radiation exposure to a pregnancy may approach 35,000 mrem or more (11, 12, 32a, 44, 45, 47, 48, 65). Radiation exposure on the International Space Station varies with altitude, solar cycle, and location of the astronaut in the space station. Thus, during a 9-mo pregnancy, exposure could range from 10,500 to 36,000 mrem, depending on the altitude of the station and the solar cycle. Moreover, these numbers could be 30% lower or 30% higher depending on where the astronaut spends their time onboard the station.
| |
SUMMARY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In summary, the only astronaut health issue for which a large enough data set exists to allow valid conclusions to be drawn about gender-specific differences is postflight orthostatic intolerance. Female shuttle astronauts have a significantly higher incidence of presyncope during postflight stand tests than do male astronauts. However, the first American astronauts who flew aboard Mir (almost all of whom were men) had an 85% failure rate during the postflight tilt test. Thus it is expected that gender-related differences will not be apparent on long-duration missions. Other gender-specific issues that are likely to have functional or operational impacts for astronauts on long-duration missions include ventricular dysrhythmias, bone and calcium changes associated with osteoporosis, menstrual function, and radiation effects on gametes. Although gender differences in aerobic capacity and muscle strength are not considered health issues per se, ground-based data suggest that women may be more susceptible to fatigue and injury, particularly during more strenuous tasks. Finally, an emerging body of evidence suggests that there are gender-specific differences in clinical efficacy and adverse effects of drug treatment (pharmacotherapeutics). Understanding these differences is likely to become more important for long-duration International Space Station and exploration missions.
Insufficient data exist in most of the discipline areas at the present time to draw valid conclusions about gender-specific differences in astronauts or to determine their impact on the health of male and female astronauts. One of the reasons for this is that the relatively small size of the female astronaut population compared with the male astronaut population generally precludes having sufficient statistical power to draw valid conclusions about gender differences. In addition, individual differences in physiological responses within genders are usually as large as, or larger than, differences between genders, so individual characteristics usually outweigh gender differences per se. Finally, data concerning gender differences in physiology for the Earth-bound population is somewhat limited.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. L. Harm, SK3/ Human Adaptation and Countermeasures Office, NASA Johnson Space Center, 2101 NASA Rd. 1, Houston, TX 77508 (E-mail: dharm{at}ems.jsc.nasa.gov).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Agarwal, SK,
and
Marshall GDJ
Perimenstrual alterations in type-1/type2 cytokine balance of normal women.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
83:
222-228,
1999[ISI][Medline].
2.
Alfrey, CP,
Udden MM,
Leach-Huntoon C,
Driscoll T,
and
Pickett MH.
Control of red blood cell mass in spaceflight.
J Appl Physiol
81:
98-104,
1996
3.
Barer, AS.
Physiological and medical aspects of the EVA.
In: The Russian Experience. Warrendale, PA: SAE, 1995, p. 1-8.
4.
Beierle, I,
Meibohm B,
and
Derendorf H.
Gender differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther
37:
529-547,
1999[ISI][Medline].
5.
Bennett, P,
and
Elliot D.
The Physiology and Medicine of Diving. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1993.
7.
Bishop, PA,
Lee SMC,
Conza NE,
Clapp LL,
Moore AD,
Williams WJ,
Guilliams ME,
and
Greenisen MC.
Carbon dioxide accumulation, walking performance, and metabolic cost in the NASA launch and entry suit.
Aviat Space Environ Med
70:
656-665,
1999[Medline].
8.
Bookspan, J.
Diving Physiology in Plain English. Kensington, MD: Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, 1995.
9.
Convertino, VA,
Stremel RW,
Bernauer E,
and
Greenleaf JE.
Cardiorespiratory responses to exercise after bedrest in men and women.
Acta Astronaut
4:
895-905,
1977[ISI][Medline].
10.
Davis, JR,
Vanderploeg JM,
Santy PA,
Jennings RT,
and
Stewart DF.
Space motion sickness during 24 flights of the space shuttle.
Aviat Space Environ Med
59:
1185-1189,
1988[Medline].
11.
Dekaban, AS.
Abnormalities in children exposed to x-radiation during various stages of gestation: tentative timetable of radiation injury to the human fetus.
Int J Nucl Med
9:
471-477,
1968.
12.
Diamond, EL,
Schmerler H,
and
Lilienfeld AM.
The relationship of intra-uterine radiation to subsequent mortality and development of leukemia in children. A prospective study.
Am J Epidemiol
97:
283-313,
1973
13.
Drinkwater, BL,
Nilson K,
Chesnut CH, III,
Bremner WJ,
Shainholtz S,
and
Southworth MB.
Bone mineral content of amenorrheic and eumenorrheic athletes.
N Engl J Med
311:
277-281,
1984[Abstract].
14.
Edgerton, VR,
Zhou MY,
Ohira Y,
Klitgaard H,
Jiang B,
Bell G,
Harris B,
Saltin B,
Gollnick PD,
Roy RR,
Day MK,
and
Greenisen M.
Human fiber size and enzymatic properties after 5 and 11 days of spaceflight.
J Appl Physiol
78:
1733-1739,
1995
15.
Fanton, JW,
and
Golden JG.
Radiation-induced endometriosis in Macaca mulatta.
Radiat Res
126:
141-146,
1991[ISI][Medline].
16.
Fletcher, CV,
Acosta EP,
and
Strykowski JM.
Gender differences in human pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
J Adolesc Health
15:
619-629,
1994[ISI][Medline].
17.
Fontecave, M,
Jaouen M,
Mansuy D,
Costa D,
and
Zalma R.
Microsomal lipid peroxidation and oxyradicals formation are induced by insoluble iron-containing materials.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
173:
912-918,
1990[ISI][Medline].
18.
Frey, MAB,
and
Hoffler WG.
Association of sex and age with responses to lower body negative pressure.
J Appl Physiol
65:
1752-1756,
1988
19.
Frey, MAB,
Tomaselli CM,
and
Hoffler WG.
Cardiovascular responses to postural changes: differences with age for women and men.
J Clin Pharmacol
34:
394-402,
1994[Abstract].
20.
Fritsch-Yelle, JM,
Leuenberger UA,
and
D'Aunno DS.
An episode of ventricular tachycardia during long-duration spaceflight.
Am J Cardiol
81:
1391-1392,
1998[ISI][Medline].
21.
Fritsch-Yelle, JM,
Whitson PA,
Bondar RL,
and
Brown TE.
Subnormal norepinephrine release relates to presyncope in astronauts after spaceflight.
J Appl Physiol
81:
2134-2141,
1996
22.
Gillum, RF.
The epidemiology of resting heart rate in a national sample of men and women: associations with hypertension, coronary heart disease, blood pressure, and other cardiovascular risk factors.
Am Heart J
116:
163-174,
1988[ISI][Medline].
23.
Grigoriev, AI,
Oganov VS,
Bakulin AV,
Poliakov VV,
Voronin LI,
Morgun VV,
Shnaider VS,
Murashko LV,
Novikov VE,
LeBlank A,
and
Shakleford L.
Kliniko-fiziologicheskaia otsenka izmenenii kostnoi tkani u kosmonavtov posle dlitel'nykh kosmicheskikh poletov.
Aviakosmicheskaia i ekologicheskaia medistsina
32:
21-25,
1998.
24.
Gutteridge, J.
Radical-promoting loosely bound iron in biological fluids and the bleomycin assay.
Life Chem Rep
4:
113-142,
1987.
25.
Harris, RZ,
Benet LZ,
and
Schwartz JB.
Gender effects in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
Drugs
50:
222-239,
1995[ISI][Medline].
26.
Jennings, RT.
Managing space motion sickness.
J Vestib Res
8:
67-70,
1998[ISI][Medline].
27.
Jones, B.
Incidence of and Risk Factors for Injury and Illness Among Male and Female Army Basic Trainees. Natick, MA: U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, 1988.
28.
Kashuba, AD,
and
Nafziger AN.
Physiological changes during the menstrual cycle and their effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs.
Clin Pharmacokinet
34:
203-218,
1998[ISI][Medline].
29.
Lane, HW,
and
Smith SM.
Nutrition in space.
In: Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease (9th ed.), edited by Shils M,
Olson J,
Shike M,
and Ross M.. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1998, p. 783-788.
30.
Larsen, JA,
and
Kadish AH.
Effects of gender on cardiac arrhythmias.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
9:
655-664,
1998[ISI][Medline].
31.
Leblanc, A,
Rowe R,
Schneider V,
and
Hedrick T.
Regional muscle loss after short duration spaceflight.
Aviat Space Environ Med
66:
1151-1154,
1995[Medline].
32.
Levine, DS,
and
Greenleaf JE.
Immunosuppression during spaceflight deconditioning.
Aviat Space Environ Med
69:
172-177,
1998[Medline].
32a.
Limitation of Exposure in Ionizing Radiation. Washington, DC: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement, 1993.
33.
Lyons, TJ.
Women in the fast jet cockpit
aeromedical considerations.
Aviat Space Environ Med
63:
809-818,
1992[Medline].
34.
Manolio, TA,
Furberg CD,
and
Rautaharju PM.
Cardiac arrhythmias on 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography in older women and men: the cardiovascular health study.
J Am Coll Cardiol
23:
916-925,
1994[Abstract].
35.
Marcus, R,
Cann C,
Madvig P,
Minkoff J,
Goddard M,
Bayer M,
Martin M,
Gaudiani L,
Haskell W,
and
Genant H.
Menstrual function and bone mass in elite women distance runners. Endocrine and metabolic features.
Ann Intern Med
102:
158-163,
1985.
36.
McClure, HM,
Ridley JH,
and
Graham CE.
Disseminated endometriosis in a Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Histogenesis and possible relationship to irradiation exposure 1,2.
J Med Assoc Ga
60:
11-13,
1971[Medline].
37.
McKardle, W,
Katch F,
and
Katch V.
Exercise Physiology. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1986.
38.
National Academy Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and Fluoride/Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes, Food and Nutrition Board. Washington, DC: National Academy, 1997.
39.
National Academy Institute of Medicine.
Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Aresenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium and Zinc/Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes, Food and Nutrition Board. Washington, DC: National Academy, 2001.
40.
Miller, AE,
MacDougall JD,
Tarnopolsky MA,
and
Sale DG.
Gender differences in strength and muscle fiber characteristics.
Eur J Appl Physiol
66:
254-262,
1993.
41.
Miller, DM,
Buettner GR,
and
Aust SD.
Transition metals as catalysts of "autooxidation" reactions.
Free Radic Biol Med
8:
95-108,
1990[ISI][Medline].
42.
NASA/JSC.
Nutritional Requirements for International Space Station Missions up to 360 Days. Houston, TX: NASA Johnson Space Center, 1996.
43.
National Research Council.
Recommended Dietary Allowances/Subcommittee on the Tenth Edition of the RDAs, Food and Nutrition Board, Committee on Life Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy, 1989.
44.
Otake, M,
and
Schull WJ.
In utero exposure to A-bomb radiation and mental retardation; a reassessment.
Br J Radiol
57:
409-414,
1984[Abstract].
45.
Otake, M,
Schull WJ,
and
Lee S.
Threshold for radiation-related severe mental retardation in prenatally exposed A-bomb survivors: a re-analysis.
Int J Radiat Biol
70:
755-763,
1996[ISI][Medline].
46.
Peacock, M,
and
Robertson WG.
Urinary calcium stone disease.
In: Endocrinology, edited by Degroot L.. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders, 1989, p. 1111-1131.
47.
Reyners, H,
Gianfelici de Reyners E,
Poortmans F,
Crametz A,
Coffigny H,
and
Maisin JR.
Brain atrophy after foetal exposure to very low doses of ionizing radiation.
Int J Radiat Biol
62:
619-26,
1992[ISI][Medline].
48.
Russell, J.
Pregnancy and ionizing radiation.
Br Med J
305:
1172-1173,
1992.
49.
Russell, JB,
Mitchell D,
Musey PI,
and
Collins DC.
The relationship of exercise to anovulatory cycles in female athletes: hormonal and physical characteristics.
Obstet Gynecol
63:
452-6,
1984
50.
Sampson, J.
Peritoneal endometriosis due to menstrual dissemination of endometrial tissue into the peritoneal cavity.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
14:
422,
1927[ISI].
51.
Sawka, MN,
and
Pandolf KB.
Upper body exercise: physiology and training application for human presence in space. Warrendale, PA: SAE, 1991, p. 1-19.
52.
Scott, R,
Te Linde R,
and
Wharton L.
Further studies on experimental endometriosis.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
66:
1082,
1953[ISI][Medline].
53.
Shangold, M,
Rebar RW,
Wentz AC,
and
Schiff I.
Evaluation and management of menstrual dysfunction in athletes.
JAMA
263:
1665-1669,
1990[Abstract].
54.
Shvartz, E,
and
Reibold RC.
Aerobic fitness norms for males and females aged 6 to 75 years: a review.
Aviat Space Environ Med
61:
3-11,
1990[Medline].
55.
Smith, SM,
Wastney ME,
Morukov BV,
Larina IM,
Nyquist LE,
Abrams SA,
Taran EN,
Shih CY,
Nillen JL,
Davis-Street JE,
Rice BL,
and
Lane HW.
Calcium metabolism before, during, and after a 3-mo spaceflight: kinetic and biochemical changes.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
277:
R1-R10,
1999
56.
Splitter, GA,
Kirk JH,
Mac Kenzie WF,
and
Rawlings CA.
Endometriosis in four irradiated rhesus monkeys.
Vet Pathol
9:
249-262,
1972[ISI][Medline].
57.
Suruda, A.
Reproductive Hazards of the Workplace, edited by Frazier LM,
and Hage ML.. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1998, p. 1.
58.
Tarnopolsky, MA,
Atkinson SA,
Phillips SM,
and
MacDougall JD.
Carbohydrate loading and metabolism during exercise in men and women.
J Appl Physiol
78:
1360-1368,
1995
59.
Taylor, GR.
Overview of spaceflight immunology studies.
J Leukoc Biol
54:
179-188,
1993.
60.
Vinge, E.
Men and women respond differently to drugs. Hormone-dependent pharmacodynamic differences are rarely studied.
Lakartidningen
95:
3177-3182,
1998[Medline].
61.
Wainer, L,
Resnick VA,
and
Resnick MI.
Nutritional aspects of stone disease.
In: Renal Stone Disease, edited by Pak CYC. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987, p. 85-112.
62.
Waligora, JM,
and
Kumar KV.
Energy utilization rates during shuttle extravehicular activities.
Acta Astonautica
36:
595-599,
1995.
63.
Wood, DH,
Yochmowitz MG,
Salmon YL,
Eason RL,
and
Boster RA.
Proton irradiation and endometriosis.
Aviat Space Environ Med
54:
718-724,
1983[Medline].
64.
Xie, CX,
Piecoro LT,
and
Wermeling DP.
Gender-related considerations in clinical pharmacology and drug therapeutics.
Crit Care Nurs Clin N Am
9:
459-468,
1997[Medline].
65.
Yamizaki, J,
and
Schull W.
Perinatal loss and neurological abnormalities among children of the atomic bomb.
JAMA
264:
605-609,
1990