|
|
||||||||
2-adrenergic antilipolytic effect
during exercise in subcutaneous adipose tissue of trained
men
1 Laboratoire des Adaptations de l'Organisme à l'Exercice Musculaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan, 31059 Toulouse Cedex; 3 Laboratoire de Pharmacologie Médicale et Clinique, Faculté de Médecine, 31073 Toulouse Cedex; 2 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Université Paul Sabatier, 31403 Toulouse Cedex; 5 Laboratoire de Physiologie de l'Environnement, Université Claude Bernard Lyon Grange Blanche, 69373 Lyon Cedex 08, France; and 4 Department of Sport Medicine, Charles University, 100 00 Prague 10, Czech Republic
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aim
of this study was to investigate the involvement of the antilipolytic
2-adrenergic receptor pathway in the regulation of
lipolysis during exercise in subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue
(SCAAT). Seven trained men and 15 untrained men were studied. With the
use of microdialysis, the extracellular glycerol concentration was
measured in SCAAT at rest and during 60 min of exercise at 50% of
maximal oxygen consumption. One microdialysis probe was perfused with
Ringer solution; the other was supplemented with phentolamine
(
2-adrenergic receptor antagonist). No differences in
baseline extracellular or plasma glycerol concentrations were found
between the two groups. The exercise-induced extracellular and plasma
glycerol increase was higher in trained compared with untrained
subjects (P < 0.05). Addition of phentolamine to the perfusate enhanced the exercise-induced response of extracellular glycerol in untrained subjects but not in trained subjects. The exercise-induced increase in plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine concentrations and the decrease in plasma insulin were not different in
the two groups. These in vivo findings demonstrate higher
exercise-induced lipolysis in trained compared with untrained subjects
and show that, in trained subjects, the
2-mediated
antilipolytic action is not involved in the regulation of lipolysis in
SCAAT during exercise.
microdialysis; catecholamines; phentolamine; glycerol; nonesterified fatty acids
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CATECHOLAMINES ARE OF MAJOR
IMPORTANCE in the regulation of lipolysis in adipose tissue
(20, 24) and in the increase of nonesterified fatty acid
(NEFA) supply to the working muscle (6, 7). The presence
of
- and
2-adrenergic receptors (AR) has been
demonstrated by functional in vitro assays in isolated human fat
cells and binding studies with selective ligands (9, 23, 25). The coexistence of
-AR that increase and
2-AR that decrease the rate of lipolysis in human fat
cells still raises questions about their physiological relevance.
In vitro, at low epinephrine concentrations, the preferential
recruitment of the
2-AR inhibits lipolysis
(28).
Physical exercise promotes lipolysis by increases of both plasma
norepinephrine and epinephrine and the decrease of plasma insulin. It
was demonstrated that, during exercise, epinephrine activates
2-AR and that this pathway inhibits lipolysis in
subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SCAAT)
(30). This is particularly the case in obese
subjects (29), in agreement with in vitro studies, which
show the high
2-mediated antilipolytic action of
catecholamines in SCAAT from the obese subjects (27). It was indicated previously, in vitro, that endurance training induces a
decrease of the antilipolytic
2-mediated action of
epinephrine, both in longitudinal studies (10) and in
cross-sectional studies (28). Moreover, higher lipid
mobilization was found in vitro in trained subjects compared with
untrained subjects in relation to an increased response of the
-adrenergic pathway (8).
Microdialysis appears to be an alternative method to study the
lipolytic response of adipose tissue, in vivo, during exercise (1, 11); it allows local infusion of pharmacological
drugs (2) and, in particular, AR antagonists to explore
the efficiency of the
2-adrenergic pathway.
Therefore, in the present study, by using a physical exercise model, we
investigated the involvement of
2-adrenergic lipolysis regulation. The aim of the present study was to compare the
2-AR activity in subcutaneous adipose tissue of
trained and untrained men during adrenergic stimulation. For that
purpose, subjects performed a prolonged exercise bout, and lipid
mobilization was assessed by the microdialysis method. The
2-AR effect was explored by perfusing the
microdialysis probe with phentolamine, an
2-AR antagonist.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects
Seven trained men [mean age (± SE) = 25.9 ± 2.2 yr] and 15 lean untrained men (25.0 ± 0.2 yr) participated in the study. The untrained subjects exercised <3 h/wk. The trained subjects were high-level cyclists. The mean body-mass index was 21.8 ± 0.3 and 23.6 ± 0.5 kg/m2 for trained and untrained subjects, respectively, and the percentage of fat mass was 7.9 ± 1.1 and 13.6 ± 1.1%, respectively. The maximal oxygen uptake (
O2 max) was 72.6 ± 3.3 and 46.4 ± 5.3 ml · min
1
· kg
1 for trained and untrained subjects,
respectively. All were drug free and had a stable weight for at least 3 mo before the beginning of the study. All subjects had given their
written, informed consent before the study. The studies were performed
according to the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Ethics
Committees of the Third Faculty of Medicine, Prague (Czech Republic)
and Toulouse I (France) University Hospital.
Study Procedure
The subjects were studied at 8:00 AM after an overnight fast. After determination of body composition using skinfold thickness (12), they were placed in a semirecumbent position. Microdialysis probes (Carnegie Medecin, Stockholm, Sweden) of 20 × 0.5 mm and 20,000-MW cutoff were inserted percutaneously after epidermal anesthesia (200 µl of 1% lidocaine; Roger-Bellon, Neuilly-s-Seine, France) into the abdominal SCAAT at a distance of 10 cm immediately to the right of the umbilicus. Two probes, separated by at least 5 cm, were connected to a microinjection pump (Harvard apparatus, SARL, Les Ulis, France). One probe was perfused with Ringer solution (in mM: 139 sodium, 2.7 potassium, 0.9 calcium, and 140.5 chloride), and the second with Ringer plus 0.1 mM phentolamine (
-AR
antagonist). This nonselective
1/
2-antagonist is the only agent allowed
by the Ethics Committees for microdialysis assays in humans. The two
perfusate solutions were supplemented with ethanol (1.7 g/l). Ethanol
was added to the perfusate to estimate changes in the blood flow, as
previously described (13, 14, 16, 19).
The calibration procedure using various perfusion rates was applied for interstitial glycerol concentration determination in SCAAT and as previously described by our group (2, 11). A simplified but relevant and less time-consuming method was selected in this study. The estimated extracellular glycerol concentrations were calculated by plotting (after log transformation) the concentration of glycerol in the dialysate measured at 0.5 and 2.5 µl/min against the perfusion rates. For this, after a 30-min equilibration period, a 30-min fraction of dialysate was collected at a flow rate of 0.5 µl/min. Then, after a 5-min flush at 10 µl/min, the perfusion was set at 2.5 µl/min for the remaining experimental period. At this flow rate, a 15-min collection was not kept, and then two 15-min fractions were kept at rest, which were used for the calibration and the basal concentration values. Therefore, the probe recovery was only evaluated at rest because it is not possible to do this during exercise.
After the calibration of the probes and the two 15-min fraction
collections at rest, the subjects started a bout of exercise on an
electromagnetically braked bicycle ergometer (Ergometrics 800s,
Ergoline, Jaeger, Germany) at a workload corresponding to 50% of their
O2 max. Exercise duration was 60 min.
Heart rate was continuously monitored with a Polar Accurex Plus
Cardiometer (Monitor, Bayonne, France) during the exercise. The
subjects then rested in the semirecumbent position for 60 min. Water
intake was allowed ad libitum during the exercise and recovery periods. During the exercise and recovery periods, 15-min fractions of the
dialysate were collected.
Before exercise and every 15 min during exercise and recovery,
5 ml of blood were collected from an indwelling polyethylene catheter
inserted into an antecubital vein for glycerol determination. Every 30 min, an additional 5 ml of blood were collected for other plasma
determinations. Blood was collected on 50 µl of an anticoagulant and
antioxidant cocktail (Immunotech, Marseille, France) to prevent oxidation of catecholamines and was processed immediately in a refrigerated centrifuge. The plasma was stored at
80°C until analysis.
Drugs and Biochemical Determinations
Phentolamine methansulfonate (Regitine) was obtained from Ciba-Geigy (Reuil-Malmaison, France). Glycerol in dialysate (10 µl) and in plasma (20 µl) was analyzed with an ultrasensitive radiometric method (5), and the intra- and interassay variabilities were 5.0 and 9.2%, respectively. Ethanol in dialysate and perfusate (5 µl) was determined with an enzymatic method (4), and the intra- and interassay variabilities were 3.0 and 4.5%, respectively. Plasma glucose and NEFA were determined with a glucose-oxidase technique (Biotrol kit, Merck-Clevenot, Nogent-s-Marne, France) and an enzymatic procedure (Wako kit, Unipath, Dardilly, France), respectively. Plasma insulin concentrations were measured using RIA kits from Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur (Marnes la Coquette, France). Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine were assayed in 1-ml aliquots of plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography using electrochemical (amperometric) detection (22). The detection limit was 20 pg/sample. Day-to-day variability was 4%, and within-run variability was 3%.Statistical Analysis
Values are means ± SE. The responses to exercise were analyzed using a paired t-test for plasma values and ANOVA (doubly multivariate repeated-measures design) for extracellular glycerol concentrations with statistical software (SAS, proc GLM). During exercise, plasma values and extracellular glycerol concentration response curves (in µmol · l
1 · h
1) were
calculated as the total integrated changes over baseline values [area
under curves (AUC)] using a trapezoidal method. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
General Observations
Body mass index, percentage of fat mass, and
O2 max were significantly
different between trained and untrained subjects (P < 0.01, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively).
The power developed was regularly adjusted to maintain the oxygen uptake constant over the exercise bout. The power developed during exercise by the untrained subjects was significantly lower (102 ± 8 W) than that developed by trained subjects (169 ± 13 W; P < 0.01), whereas heart rate was not significantly different (138 ± 3 and 124 ± 2 beats/min for untrained and trained subjects, respectively).
Plasma Catecholamine Concentrations
At rest, plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine concentrations were not different between the two groups. During exercise, the plasma norepinephrine concentrations were significantly higher than baseline at minute 30 (P < 0.001) and afterward did not change until the end of exercise in either group. After the 60-min recovery period, norepinephrine concentrations decreased to a value that did not differ from that measured at rest (Table 1). The plasma epinephrine concentrations increased until the end of exercise (P < 0.05 for trained and P < 0.001 for untrained). After 60 min of recovery, the epinephrine concentrations decreased to a value that did not differ from that measured at rest (Table 1). AUC calculated for norepinephrine and epinephrine increase in plasma during the exercise bout showed no significant differences between the two groups.
|
Plasma Glucose and Insulin Concentrations
In the baseline period, the plasma concentrations of glucose and insulin were similar in both groups. No significant variation of plasma glucose level was observed during the exercise bout. A significant decrease in plasma insulin concentrations was observed at the end of the exercise (P < 0.05) in trained and untrained subjects (Table 1). AUC calculated for glucose and insulin variations in plasma during the exercise bouts showed no significant differences between the two groups.Plasma NEFA and Glycerol Levels and Extracellular Glycerol Concentrations in Adipose Tissue
Baseline values.
During the baseline period, plasma NEFA concentrations were
significantly higher in untrained than in trained subjects (386 ± 44 vs. 137 ± 25 µmol/l, respectively; Fig.
1). Plasma glycerol concentrations did
not differ between the two groups (68 ± 10 vs. 62 ± 4 µmol/l, respectively); the same was true for the corresponding baseline extracellular glycerol concentrations in SCAAT in the probe
perfused with Ringer solution, i.e., the control probe (170 ± 21 and 144 ± 34 µmol/l in untrained and trained subjects,
respectively). The baseline extracellular glycerol concentrations in
the probe with phentolamine were not different from those in the
control probe (227 ± 33 and 149 ± 43 µmol/l in SCAAT of
untrained and trained subjects, respectively; Fig.
2).
|
|
Exercise values. In both groups, plasma NEFA concentrations changed weakly during the exercise period. After 15 min of recovery, NEFA concentration increased (671 ± 89 and 406 ± 61 µmol/l in untrained and trained subjects, respectively) and then decreased to values not different from those found at rest (Fig. 1). Plasma glycerol level increased during exercise in both groups and then, after a 1-h recovery period, decreased to values not significantly different from those found at rest (Fig. 1). The calculated AUC of plasma glycerol increase was lower for untrained than for trained subjects (3,762 ± 618 vs. 7,793 ± 1,470, respectively; P < 0.003).
During exercise, extracellular glycerol concentrations increased during the first 15 min of the control probe for the two groups (Fig. 2) and continued to increase until the end of exercise. However, the exercise-induced increase tended to be lower in untrained than in trained subjects (497 ± 60 vs. 605 ± 68 µmol/l after 60 min of exercise), but the difference was not significant. The calculated AUC of extracellular glycerol response to exercise was significantly lower in untrained than in trained subjects (11,025 ± 1,612 vs. 15,638 ± 2,371, respectively; P < 0.05). In the probe supplemented with phentolamine in untrained subjects, the extracellular glycerol concentrations increased significantly starting from 15 min and was 758 ± 118 µmol/l after 60 min of exercise (Fig. 2). The glycerol increase was ~1.5-fold higher in the probe with phentolamine than in the control probe. The corresponding calculated AUC of glycerol increase was 17,564 ± 3,530 with phentolamine vs. 11,025 ± 1,612 in control (P < 0.05). On the other hand, in trained subjects, the exercise-induced response of extracellular glycerol was not different in the phentolamine-supplemented probe from that in the control probe (corresponding calculated AUC of glycerol increase was 15,055 ± 2,397 vs. 15,638 ± 2,371; Fig. 2). During exercise, there was no significant interaction between group and treatment (P = 0.112).Ethanol Outflow-to-Inflow Ratio in Adipose Tissue
Ethanol outflow-to-inflow ratios (expressed as a percentage, i.e., the ethanol concentration in the dialysate divided by the ethanol concentration in the perfusate × 100) from control and phentolamine-added probes are depicted in Fig. 3. In the control probe, the ethanol ratio was not different in the two groups at rest (52.2 ± 4.9 and 51.6 ± 6.1 for untrained and trained subjects, respectively). At rest, phentolamine did not induce changes in the ethanol ratio in either group (53.5 ± 4.6 and 50.5 ± 6.7 for untrained and trained subjects, respectively). A slight decrease in the ethanol outflow-to-inflow ratio was observed during the first 30 min of exercise in untrained subjects and during the first 15 min in trained subjects. The addition of phentolamine induced a more marked and prolonged decrease in the ethanol outflow-to-inflow ratio, which occurred during the whole exercise period in untrained subjects and during the first 30 min of exercise in trained subjects (Fig. 3).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study demonstrates that, in the trained unlike in the
untrained subjects,
2-AR are not involved in the
regulation of lipolysis during exercise. The lack of
2-AR involvement might contribute to the higher
exercise-induced lipolysis in trained subjects.
The exercise-induced increase in lipolysis is promoted by increased
catecholamine levels (and lowered insulinemia). It has been shown that
the hormonal response to exercise is determined by relative, not
absolute, intensity (15). Therefore, in the present study,
both groups exercised at the same percentage of
O2 max. The exercise-induced responses
of both catecholamines and insulin were similar in the two groups.
Consequently, in trained subjects, the increased exercise-induced
lipolysis was not associated with a different catecholamine stimulation
(or insulin inhibition) of lipolysis. In fact, the exercise-induced
rise of extracellular glycerol was higher in trained compared with
untrained subjects. However, the concentration of glycerol in the
extracellular space is not determined solely by the rate of lipolysis
in adipocytes; it is also influenced by local blood flow.
Pharmacological studies have shown that local blood flow modifies
glycerol levels in adipose tissue, i.e., that vasoconstriction
increases and vasodilatation decreases extracellular glycerol
concentration in adipose tissue (13). During exercise, the
increase in extracellular glycerol concentration could be due to
changes in blood flow in adipose tissue. The measurement of ethanol
escape through the dialysis probe is a validated nonquantitative method
used to estimate the changes in vasomotricity in aerobic threshold
(14). In agreement with some authors (17,
30), the stability of the ethanol outflow-to-inflow ratio found
during the exercise bouts indicated that vasomotricity did not change
during exercise. Consequently, exercise-induced changes in
extracellular glycerol concentration are not influenced by local blood
flow changes and, consequently, reflect changes in local lipolysis in
SCAAT. In the presence of phentolamine, there was a slight decrease in
the ethanol ratio (
2-AR blockade involving
vasodilatation), but the difference with the control probe was not
significant. Furthermore, it appears that, without the weak
vasodilatation found in untrained subjects, the extracellular glycerol
increase would have been higher, confirming our results.
Hydrolysis of triglyceride produces glycerol and NEFA. Glycerol gives the best index of lipid mobilization because it cannot be used by adipocyte or muscle, unlike NEFA. In this experiment, the exercise-induced increase of extracellular and plasma glycerol concentrations was lower in untrained subjects; therefore, we can conclude that a lower lipolytic response occurred during exercise in this group vs. trained subjects. Conversely, results concerning NEFA were different (plasma NEFA concentrations were found to be higher in untrained than in trained fasting subjects); this can be explained by lower NEFA oxidation in muscle of nontrained subjects (21, 32).
The catecholamines (epinephrine and norepinephrine) control lipolysis
by a dual action: stimulation via
-AR and inhibition via
2-AR. The resulting effect of catecholamines is
determined by the relative contribution of the two pathways
(24). As demonstrated previously, epinephrine shows an
antilipolytic action mediated by
2-AR during exercise
(30). This antilipolytic action of epinephrine did not
appear significant (although it was present) during a single bout of
exercise in untrained subjects (30), perhaps because the
untrained population is in fact very heterogeneous on account of the
variability of the spontaneous activity. Therefore, in the present
study, a large group of untrained subjects (15) was
studied to better evaluate the statistical significance of the
antilipolytic effect during exercise. Consequently, the blockade of
2-AR by phentolamine produced an enhancement of
lipolytic responses to exercise in the group of untrained but not
trained subjects, whereas the epinephrine responses in the trained and untrained subjects were identical. This indicates an absence of
2-regulation of lipolysis during exercise in the trained
group. Moreover, the higher
2-adrenergic responsiveness
in untrained subjects might contribute to a lower lipid mobilization.
However, our study was restricted to male subjects, so we cannot
conclude about women. Indeed, Hellström et al. (17)
showed a different response of
2-AR between men and
women; in women, only
-AR were activated. Similarly, only SCAAT was
investigated, and we cannot say whether these data are available to
other adipose tissue sites. For example, an in vitro study with
isolated abdominal or gluteal adipose cells in obese women showed an
2-AR affinity and density that differed between
abdominal and gluteal subcutaneous fat depots (3). It has
been demonstrated that, during exercise, the stimulation effect of
catecholamines on lipolysis is mediated by the
-adrenergic pathway
(1). In cross-sectional (8) as well as in
longitudinal (31) in vitro studies, it has been shown that
the responsiveness of isolated adipocytes to
-adrenergic lipolysis
stimulation is higher in trained subjects. Consequently, the lower
-adrenergic responsiveness in untrained subjects might also
contribute to their lower exercise-induced lipolysis.
The present results show that training induces a weakening of the
2-mediated antilipolytic action. This appears to support results of in vitro longitudinal studies (10) in which
obese subjects were trained for 12 wk; the training elicited a decrease of the
2-antilipolytic action of epinephrine in vitro.
Moreover, when interpreting the present results, we must consider the
differences in fat mass between the two groups. Higher fat mass
suggests a higher adipocyte volume in the untrained subjects, and this
could be a reason for the higher
2-AR activity, as it
was shown that the
2-AR activity depends on fat cell
size (26). Similarly, in another experiment, we found that
2-AR activity was more striking in obese subjects than
in nonobese subjects independent of endurance training
(29), and Hellström et al. (18) showed
that, after weight loss during very-low-calorie diet,
2-AR sensitivity decreased. However, when obese subjects
were trained for 3 mo, although their weight did not change, the
antilipolytic effect of
2-AR in vitro was decreased
(10); this illustrates the effect of training on AR activity.
In summary, the present study demonstrates that, in trained subjects,
the antilipolytic action of catecholamines mediated by
2-AR is not involved in the regulation of lipolysis in
SCAAT during exercise. This absence of
2-AR involvement
differentiates trained from untrained subjects and, in conjunction with
a more efficient
-adrenergic pathway, can contribute to the higher
exercise-induced lipolysis in trained subjects. This study underscores
the role of the
2-adrenergic pathway in the effects of
training on the regulation of lipolysis in SCAAT and indicates the
importance of physical training for the regulation of fat mass in
humans. It would be tempting to confirm these findings by a
longitudinal study involving training of sedentary subjects.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors express their gratitude to M. T. Canal and S. Parizkova for contribution to the study and M. Meste for statistical analysis.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The study was partially supported by Grant GAUK 199 of Charles University, Czech Republic, and the laboratories involved in the study participated in the Commission of the European Communities, Agriculture and Fisheries specific RTD program CT98-4141 (FATLINK: dietary fat, body weight control, and links between obesity and cardiovascular disease).
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: I. de Glisezinski, Service d'Exploration de la Fonction Respiratoire et de Médecine du Sport, CHU Purpan, 31059 Toulouse Cedex, France (E-mail: crampes.f{at}chu-toulouse.fr).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 10 May 2000; accepted in final form 20 May 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Arner, P,
Kriegholm E,
Engfeldt P,
and
Bolinder J.
Adrenergic regulation of lipolysis in situ at rest and during exercise.
J Clin Invest
85:
893-898,
1990.
2.
Barbe, P,
Millet L,
Galitzky J,
Lafontan M,
and
Berlan M.
In situ assessment of the role of the
1-,
2- and
3-adrenoceptors in the control of lipolysis and nutritive blood flow in human subcutaneous adipose tissue.
Br J Pharmacol
117:
907-913,
1996[ISI][Medline].
3.
Berman, DM,
Nicklas BJ,
Rogus EM,
Dennis KE,
and
Goldberg AP.
Regional differences in adrenoceptor binding and fat cell lipolysis in obese, postmenopausal women.
Metabolism
47:
467-473,
1998[ISI][Medline].
4.
Bernst, E,
and
Gutmann I.
Ethanol determination with alcohol dehydrogenase and NAD.
In: Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, edited by Bergmeyer HU.. New York: Academic, 1974, p. 1499-1505.
5.
Bradley, DC,
and
Kaslow HR.
Radiometric assays for glycerol, glucose and glycogen.
Anal Biochem
180:
11-16,
1989[ISI][Medline].
6.
Bülow, J.
Lipid mobilization and utilization.
In: Principles of Exercise Biochemistry, (2nd ed.), edited by Poortmans JR.. Basel: Karger, 1993, p. 158-185.
7.
Christensen, NJ,
and
Galbo H.
Sympathetic nervous activity during exercise.
Annu Rev Physiol
45:
139-153,
1983[ISI][Medline].
8.
Crampes, F,
Beauville M,
Rivière D,
and
Garrigues M.
Effect of physical training in humans on the response of isolated fat cells to epinephrine.
J Appl Physiol
61:
25-29,
1986
9.
Crampes, F,
Beauville M,
Rivière D,
Garrigues M,
and
Lafontan M.
Lack of desensitization of catecholamine-induced lipolysis in fat cells from trained and sedentary women after physical exercise.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
67:
1011-1017,
1988[Abstract].
10.
De Glisezinski, I,
Crampes F,
Harant I,
Berlan M,
Hejnova J,
Langin D,
Riviere D,
and
Stich V.
Endurance training changes in lipolytic responsiveness of obese adipose tissue.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
275:
E951-E956,
1998
11.
De Glisezinski, I,
Harant I,
Crampes F,
Trudeau F,
Felez A,
Cottet-Emard JM,
Garrigues M,
and
Riviere D.
Effect of carbohydrate ingestion on adipose tissue lipolysis during long-lasting exercise in trained men.
J Appl Physiol
84:
1627-1632,
1998
12.
Durnin, JVG,
and
Womersley J.
Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 418 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years.
Br J Nutr
32:
77-97,
1974[ISI][Medline].
13.
Enocksson, S,
Nordenstrom J,
Bolinder J,
and
Arner P.
Influence of local blood flow on glycerol levels in human adipose tissue.
Int J Obes
19:
350-354,
1995.
14.
Felländer, G,
Linde B,
and
Bolinder J.
Evaluation of the microdialysis ethanol technique for monitoring of subcutaneous adipose tissue blood flow in humans.
Int J Obes
20:
220-226,
1996.
15.
Galbo, H,
and
Gollnick MD.
Hormonal changes during and after exercise.
Med Sport Sci
17:
97-100,
1984.
16.
Galitzky, J,
Lafontan M,
Nordenström J,
and
Arner P.
Role of vascular
2-adrenoceptors in regulating lipid mobilization from human adipose tissue.
J Clin Invest
91:
1997-2003,
1993.
17.
Hellström, L,
Blaak E,
and
Hagström-Toft E.
Gender differences in adrenergic regulation of lipid mobilization during exercise.
Int J Sports Med
17:
439-447,
1996[ISI][Medline].
18.
Hellström, L,
Rossner S,
Hagström-Toft E,
and
Reynisdottir S.
Lipolytic catecholamine resistance linked to
2-adrenoceptor sensitivity: a metabolic predictor of weight loss in obese subjects.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
21:
314-320,
1997[ISI][Medline].
19.
Hickner, RC,
Rosdahl H,
Borg I,
Ungerstedt U,
Jorfeldt L,
and
Henriksson J.
Ethanol may be used with the microdialysis technique to monitor blood flow changes in skeletal muscle: dialysate glucose concentration is blood flow-dependent.
Acta Physiol Scand
143:
355-356,
1991[ISI][Medline].
20.
Hodgetts, V,
Coppack SW,
Frayn KN,
and
Hockaday TDR
Factors controlling fat mobilization from human subcutaneous adipose tissue during exercise.
J Appl Physiol
71:
445-451,
1991
21.
Klein, S,
Coyle EF,
and
Wolfe RR.
Fat metabolism during low-intensity exercise in endurance-trained and untrained men.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
267:
E934-E940,
1994
22.
Koubi, HE,
Desplanches D,
Gabrielle C,
Cottet-Emard JM,
Sempore B,
and
Favier RJ.
Exercise endurance and fuel utilization: a reevaluation of the effects of fasting.
J Appl Physiol
70:
1337-1343,
1991
23.
Lafontan, M,
and
Berlan M.
Evidence for the
2-nature of the alpha-adrenergic receptor inhibiting lipolysis in human fat cells.
Eur J Pharmacol
66:
87-93,
1980[ISI][Medline].
24.
Lafontan, M,
and
Berlan M.
Fat cell adrenergic receptors and the control of white and brown fat cell function.
J Lipid Res
34:
1057-1091,
1993[Abstract].
25.
Lafontan, M,
and
Berlan M.
Fat cell
2-adrenoceptors: the regulation of fat cell function and lipolysis.
Endocr Rev
16:
716-738,
1995[ISI][Medline].
26.
Mauriège, P,
Després JP,
Prud'homme D,
Pouliot MC,
Marcotte M,
Tremblay A,
and
Bouchard C.
Regional variation in adipose tissue lipolysis in lean and obese men.
J Lipid Res
32:
1625-1633,
1991[Abstract].
27.
Mauriège, P,
Galitzky J,
Berlan M,
and
Lafontan M.
Heterogeneous distribution of
- and
2-adrenoceptor binding sites in human fat cells from various fat deposits: functional consequences.
Eur J Clin Invest
17:
156-165,
1987[ISI][Medline].
28.
Rivière, D,
Crampes F,
Beauville M,
and
Garrigues M.
Lipolytic response of fat cells to catecholamines in sedentary and exercise-trained women.
J Appl Physiol
66:
330-335,
1989
29.
Stich, V,
De Glisezinski I,
Crampes F,
Cottet-Emard JM,
Galitzky J,
Lafontan M,
Rivière D,
and
Berlan M.
Physiological activation of
2-adrenergic receptors impairs exercise-induced lipolysis in subcutaneous adipose tissue of obese subjects.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
279:
R499-R504,
2000
30.
Stich, V,
De Glisezinski I,
Crampes F,
Suljkovicova H,
Galitzky J,
Rivière D,
Hejnova J,
Lafontan M,
and
Berlan M.
Activation of antilipolytic
2-adrenergic receptors by epinephrine during exericse in human adipose tissue.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
277:
R1076-R1083,
1999
31.
Stich, V,
De Glisezinski I,
Galitzky J,
Hejnova J,
Crampes F,
Rivière D,
and
Berlan M.
Endurance training increases the
-adrenergic lipolytic response in subcutaneous adipose tissue in obese subjects.
Int J Obes
23:
374-381,
1999.
32.
Turcotte, LP,
Richter EA,
and
Kiens B.
Increased plasma FFA uptake and oxidation during prolonged exercise in trained vs. untrained humans.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
262:
E791-E799,
1992
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Hershberger, M. R. McCammon, J. P. Garry, M. T. Mahar, and R. C. Hickner Responses of Lipolysis and Salivary Cortisol to Food Intake and Physical Activity in Lean and Obese Children J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4701 - 4707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. de Glisezinski, C. Moro, F. Pillard, F. Marion-Latard, I. Harant, M. Meste, M. Berlan, F. Crampes, and D. Riviere Aerobic training improves exercise-induced lipolysis in SCAT and lipid utilization in overweight men Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2003; 285(5): E984 - E990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. W. Booth, M. V. Chakravarthy, S. E. Gordon, and E. E. Spangenburg Waging war on physical inactivity: using modern molecular ammunition against an ancient enemy J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2002; 93(1): 3 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |