Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 91: 1121-1130, 2001;
8750-7587/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Iwamoto, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Iwamoto, J.
Vol. 91, Issue 3, 1121-1130, September 2001

Role of airway nitric oxide on the regulation of pulmonary circulation by carbon dioxide

Yasushi Yamamoto1, Hitoshi Nakano1, Hiroshi Ide1, Toshiyuki Ogasa1, Toru Takahashi1, Shinobu Osanai1, Kenjiro Kikuchi1, and Jun Iwamoto2

1 Department of Internal Medicine and 2 Division of Applied Physiology, School of Nursing, Asahikawa Medical College, Asahikawa 078-8510, Japan


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The effects of hypercapnia (CO2) confined to either the alveolar space or the intravascular perfusate on exhaled nitric oxide (NO), perfusate NO metabolites (NOx), and pulmonary arterial pressure (Ppa) were examined during normoxia and progressive 20-min hypoxia in isolated blood- and buffer-perfused rabbit lungs. In blood-perfused lungs, when alveolar CO2 concentration was increased from 0 to 12%, exhaled NO decreased, whereas Ppa increased. Increments of intravascular CO2 levels increased Ppa without changes in exhaled NO. In buffer-perfused lungs, alveolar CO2 increased Ppa with reductions in both exhaled NO from 93.8 to 61.7 (SE) nl/min (P < 0.01) and perfusate NOx from 4.8 to 1.8 nmol/min (P < 0.01). In contrast, intravascular CO2 did not affect either exhaled NO or Ppa despite a tendency for perfusate NOx to decline. Progressive hypoxia elevated Ppa by 28% from baseline with a reduction in exhaled NO during normocapnia. Alveolar hypercapnia enhanced hypoxic Ppa response up to 50% with a further decline in exhaled NO. Hypercapnia did not alter the apparent Km for O2, whereas it significantly decreased the Vmax from 66.7 to 55.6 nl/min. These results suggest that alveolar CO2 inhibits epithelial NO synthase activity noncompetitively and that the suppressed NO production by hypercapnia augments hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, resulting in improved ventilation-perfusion matching.

hypercapnia; epithelium; hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

VENTILATION-PERFUSION (VA/Q) matching in the lung is vital for improving gas exchange and arterial oxygenation. It is well known that hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) plays an important role in this mechanism and that alveolar hypoxia is a major determining factor for local blood flow (12). In addition to hypoxia, hypercapnia has been demonstrated to evoke pulmonary vasoconstriction (5, 16, 21). Furthermore, the pressor response to hypoxia is augmented by CO2 inhalation (2, 23). Several studies, however, reported conflicting results that CO2 elicits pulmonary vasodilation during both normoxia (6, 34) and hypoxia (4). Although controversy persists over the role of CO2 in the regulation of pulmonary circulation, it has been demonstrated that alveolar hypercapnia evoked pulmonary vasoconstriction, whereas intravascular hypercapnia elicited vasodilation, suggesting that the stimulus of alveolar CO2 may be different from that of intravascular CO2 in the regulation of pulmonary circulation (16).

Nitric oxide (NO), a highly diffusible gas with a potent vasodilator action, is synthesized enzymatically by NO synthase (NOS) from L-arginine and molecular O2 as a substrate (24). In the lung, NOS immunoactivity is localized in airway epithelium and pulmonary vascular endothelium (20). Recently, it has been demonstrated that airway epithelial NOS produces NO from ambient O2 through the Michaelis-Menten kinetic mechanism in humans (11) and in isolated rabbit lungs (17). It is widely accepted that endogenous NO regulates pulmonary vascular tone (3) and modulates the pressor response to hypoxia (9). We have previously demonstrated that alveolar hypoxia reduces exhaled NO production in isolated rabbit lungs, suggesting that NO released from the epithelium can control the pulmonary circulation (17). On the other hand, it has been reported that CO2 inhalation also causes a reduction in exhaled NO in rabbits (1, 29) and dogs (7). However, the precise mechanism responsible for inhibition of exhaled NO by CO2 and its physiological significance in the regulation of pulmonary circulation are unknown. Furthermore, it has not been determined whether either isolated alveolar or intravascular CO2 contributes to the NO suppression and pulmonary pressor response.

With regard to the action of either NO or CO2, we hypothesized that NO production in the epithelium would be regulated by alveolar CO2 tension, but not by intravascular CO2, and thus the effect of CO2 on the pulmonary pressor response could be partially mediated by an alteration of airway NO. In addition, we hypothesized that enhancement of HPV by hypercapnia would be mediated also via airway NO. In the present study, we measured exhaled NO, perfusate NO metabolites (NOx), and pulmonary arterial pressure (Ppa) during inhalation of various concentrations of CO2 in an isolated blood- and buffer-perfused lung model while separately controlling alveolar and intravascular CO2 levels using a membrane oxygenator. We also examined the effect of CO2 on the lung NO production response to lowering inspired O2 fraction (FIO2) and the combined effects of hypoxia and hypercapnia on pulmonary pressor response.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Preparation of the Isolated Lung

The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Asahikawa Medical College. Male Japanese albino rabbits weighing between 3.0 and 3.5 kg were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg iv), intubated, and ventilated by a respirator (model 683, Harvard Apparatus) with NO-free room air. The animal underwent cannulation of the right common carotid artery, which was immediately used for heparinization (1,000 U/kg) and phlebotomy (100-150 ml of blood letting). Subsequently, the chest of the animal was opened, and the heart and great vessels were exposed. After the main pulmonary artery was cannulated via the apex of the right ventricle and the left atrium via the left ventricle, the lungs with the heart and the trachea were excised en bloc and placed in a humidified chamber kept at 37°C. The isolated lungs were then connected to the circuit consisting of a reservoir, a roller pump (Master Flex, Cole-Parmer Instrument), and an extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) (SILOX-S 0.3, MERA) located before the pulmonary artery, in which circulatory volume was ~200 ml. After the lungs were rinsed thoroughly with buffer solution of Krebs-Henseleit buffer containing (in mM) 119.2 NaCl, 4.7 KCl, 1.2 KH2PO4, 1.2 MgSO4, 25 NaHCO3, 3.2 CaCl2, and 15 glucose, the perfusion system was closed (buffer-perfused lungs), or, after 150 ml of buffer solution were taken away, autologous blood was added into the reservoir and hematocrit was adjusted to ~15% (blood-perfused lungs). The perfusate returning from the reservoir to the lung passed through the ECMO. The pump rate (flow rate) was adjusted to 100 ml/min during the entire experimental period. The isolated lungs were ventilated at 0.9 l/min (30 ml × 30 cycles) of minute ventilation (VE) with the use of a gas mixture of 20% O2-6% CO2-balance N2 (standard gas). The ECMO was also supplied with the standard gas to adjust the perfusate pH to 7.4 and PCO2 to 40 Torr, respectively.

Measurements of Physiological Parameters and Exhaled NO

Ppa and pulmonary venous pressure (Ppv) were measured with pressure transducers (model AP-601G, Nihon Koden). Airway pressure (Paw) was also measured with a low-pressure transducer (model TP-603T, Nihon Koden). An electromagnetic flowmeter (model MFV-1100, Nihon Koden) was placed in line proximal to the pulmonary artery to measure pulmonary perfusion rate. Exhaled NO was continuously measured by a chemiluminescence analyzer (model NOA 270B, Sievers) from the outlet limb of the tracheal tube. End-tidal O2 fraction and CO2 fraction (FETCO2) were also monitored via this outlet by a gas analyzer (Respina IH26, Sanei). Signals from these probes were continuously recorded via a data acquisition system (MacLab, AD Instrument) for real-time recording and later analysis.

A quantitative measurement of exhaled NO production (VNO) can be obtained by measuring both NO and VE
<A><AC>V</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SC>no</SC> (nl<IT>/</IT>min)<IT>=</IT>[NO]<IT>×</IT><A><AC>V</AC><AC>˙</AC></A><SC>e</SC>
where [NO] is the mean concentration of exhaled NO expressed in parts per billion (ppb), and VE is expressed in liters per minute.

Quenching Effect of CO2 on NO Measurements

CO2 is known to cause a decrease in NO measurements because of a quenching effect on the chemiluminescence process (33). Therefore, we examined the influence of CO2 on our NO measurements. A small amount of 100% CO2 gas was put into a plastic bag filled with a gas mixture of NO (100 ppb) and balance N2 while NO and CO2 concentrations were measured (n = 4). The value of NO concentration was calculated from adding the volume of CO2 gas and subtracting the volume drawn by the chemiluminescence NO analyzer and the CO2 gas analyzer.

Measurements of NOx in the Perfusate

The method for the measurement of NOx (NO<UP><SUB>2</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> and NO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>) has been previously described in detail (17). In brief, the perfusate sample was incubated with Aspergillus NO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> reductase to reduce NO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> to NO<UP><SUB>2</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> and then acidified using acetoacetate and potassium iodine to convert NO<UP><SUB>2</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> to NO. The gaseous NO was measured by the chemiluminescence analyzer. In the analyzer, NO combines with ozone to generate a luminescence directly proportional to the amount of NO injected, i.e., to the original NOx in the perfusate sample. Before and after the samples were measured, calibrations were performed by using 1 µM of NaNO2 solution for NO<UP><SUB>2</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> and NaNO3 solution for NO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>, resulting in a perfect linear relationship between actual concentrations and measured values over a wide range (10-11 to 10-9 mol).

Experimental Protocols

Protocol I A: Alveolar CO2 exposure in blood-perfused lungs (n = 5). Before this protocol was started, normoxic gas mixtures (20% O2), which contained various concentrations of CO2 (FICO2 = 0, 0.03, 0.06, 0.09, and 0.12) were prepared. After stabilization with standard gas inhalation, the isolated lung was ventilated with a gas mixture of FICO2 = 0 for 15 min followed by the standard gas for 10 min. Thereafter, this maneuver was repeated with stepwise increases in FICO2 from 0.03 to 0.12. During experimental period, the ECMO was supplied with standard gas. The pre- and postlung perfusate were sampled for gas analysis at the last minute of each alveolar CO2 exposure.

Protocol I B: Intravascular CO2 exposure in blood-perfused lungs (n = 5). After stabilization with standard gas inhalation, CO2 concentration of gas mixture supplying to the ECMO was changed to 0% for 15 min followed by 6% for 15 min and then 12% for 15 min, while the isolated lung was ventilated with standard gas.

Protocol II A: Alveolar CO2 exposure in buffer-perfused lungs (n = 6). The same protocol as protocol I A was performed in buffer-perfused lungs. In addition, during experimental period, aliquots of the postlung perfusate were sampled at 5-min intervals to measure perfusate NOx accumulation rate, which was calculated from the slope of plots between perfusate NOx concentrations and time.

Protocol II B: Intravascular CO2 exposure in buffer-perfused lungs (n = 6). The same protocol as protocol IB was performed in buffer-perfused lungs. The procedure of perfusate sampling was the same as that of protocol IIA.

Protocol III: Hypoxia exposure during hypercapnia in buffer-perfused lungs (n = 5). After ventilation with standard gas, a 6% CO2-N2 balance normocapnic gas mixture was slowly added to the ventilating gas while FIO2 was monitored. The FIO2 was gradually decreased from 0.2 to 0 for 20 min followed by an increase to 0.2 without changes in FICO2. Next, inspired gas was switched to a gas mixture of 12% CO2-20% O2-N2 balance. Then, a second gradually progressive hypoxic challenge was carried out by adding a 12% CO2-N2 balance-hypercapnia gas mixture. During the experimental period, the ECMO was supplied with standard gas to maintain prelung pH at 7.4 and PvCO2 at 40 Torr.

Statistics

In protocols I and II, the effects of each CO2 exposure on VNO, perfusate NOx accumulation, and Ppa were analyzed by an analysis of ANOVA for repeated measures. When significance was indicated, a post hoc t-test with Bonferroni's correction for multiple comparisons was used. The relationships among Ppa, CO2 concentration, and VNO were examined by linear least squares regression analysis. In protocol III, the relationship between VNO and O2 level, which obeys the Michaelis-Menten kinetics, was analyzed by double-reciprocal plotting (Lineweaver-Burke plots) with linear least squares regression. In all cases, a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data presented in the text, tables, and figures represent means ± SE.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Quenching Effect of CO2 on NO Measurements

As shown in Fig. 1A, each NO reading at various CO2 concentrations was reduced compared with the actual value of the NO concentration. When the CO2 concentration was 12%, the NO reading decreased by 4.5% from 85.1 to 81.2 ppb. The average reduction rate of NO measurement as a function of CO2 was estimated as 0.38% per 1% CO2 (Fig. 1B).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Quenching effects of CO2 on nitric oxide (NO) reading of chemiluminescence signal. Each NO reading at various CO2 concentrations was reduced compared with the actual value of the NO concentration (A). The average reduction rate of NO reading obtained from linear least squares regression was 0.38% per 1% CO2 (B). ppb, Parts per billion. Values are means ± SE.

Blood-perfused Lungs

In protocol I A, stepwise increments of FICO2 caused significant increases in postlung PaCO2 and corresponding decreases in pH. In protocol I B, changes in CO2 levels supplying to the ECMO caused significant alterations in prelung PvCO2 and pH (Table 1). Although we attempted to achieve the same intensity of intravascular hypercapnic acidosis between alveolar and intravascular CO2 exposure, the intensity of protocol I B was slightly greater than that of protocol I A, as judged by the end-point measurements (protocol I B, prelung: pH ~7.15, PvCO2 ~76.1 Torr vs. protocol I A, postlung: pH ~7.19, PaCO2 ~61.7 Torr at 0.12 of FICO2). Pre- and postlung perfusate PO2 were maintained constant to be ~150 Torr. Throughout the entire experimental period, Ppv and Paw did not change.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   VNO, pulmonary arterial pressure, and perfusate gas analysis in blood-perfused lungs

Figure 2 illustrates representative recordings of protocols I A (left) and I B (right). The stepwise increases in FICO2 increased Ppa with reductions in exhaled NO. Increases in intravascular CO2 also caused slight increments of Ppa, whereas exhaled NO did not change. As summarized in Table 1, when FICO2 was increased in a stepwise manner from 0.06 to 0.12, VNO significantly decreased from 20.9 ± 1.1 to 14.2 ± 1.2 nl/min (P < 0.05), whereas Ppa significantly increased from 17.8 ± 1.0 to 23.5 ± 1.9 mmHg (P < 0.05). In contrast, when FICO2 was decreased from 0.06 to 0, VNO increased with a reduction in Ppa. The changes in CO2 level supplying to the ECMO from 0.06 to 0.12 significantly increased Ppa from 17 ± 0.7 to 18.5 ± 0.8 mmHg (P < 0.05) without changes in VNO.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Representative recordings of exhaled NO, end-tidal CO2 fraction (FETCO2), and pulmonary arterial pressure (Ppa) during alveolar CO2 exposure (A) and intravascular CO2 exposure (B) in a blood-perfused lung (protocol I). The stepwise increment of inspired CO2 fraction (FICO2) decreased exhaled NO with a marked rise in Ppa (A; left). Changes in venous PCO2 (PvCO2) did not affect exhaled NO with a slight rise in Ppa (B). Values are means ± SE.

Buffer-perfused Lungs

As shown in Table 2, in protocol II A with buffer perfusion, we were able to maintain prelung perfusate in the isohydric range between ~7.38 to ~7.41 of pH. Similar to protocol I with blood perfusion, the intensity of the hypercapnic acidosis in protocol II B was slightly greater than that of protocol IIA as judged by the endpoint measurements (protocol II B, prelung: pH ~7.12, PvCO2 ~75.5 Torr vs. protocol II A, post-lung: pH ~7.19, PaCO2 ~61.8 Torr at 0.12 of FICO2). During the experimental period, pre- and postlung perfusate PO2 were maintained constant to be ~150 Torr.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   VNO, perfusate NOx accumulation, pulmonary arterial pressure, and perfusate gas analysis in buffer-perfused lungs

Figure 3 illustrates representative recordings of protocol II A (A) and II B (B). The stepwise rises in FICO2 increased Ppa with significant reductions in exhaled NO. However, increases in intravascular CO2 did not change Ppa and exhaled NO. As summarized in Table 2, when FICO2 was stepwise increased from 0.06 to 0.12, VNO significantly decreased from 77.3 ± 5.1 to 61.7 ± 6.2 nl/min (P < 0.05) and perfusate NOx accumulation also decreased from 2.9 ± 0.3 to 1.8 ± 0.3 nmol/min (P < 0.05), whereas Ppa increased from 13.1 ± 2.3 to 14.2 ± 2.2 mmHg (P < 0.05). In contrast, when FICO2 was decreased from 0.06 to 0, VNO increased from 77.3 ± 5.1 to 93.8 ± 7.3 nl/min (P < 0.05) and perfusate NOx accumulation also increased from 2.9 ± 0.3 to 4.8 ± 0.7 nmol/min (P < 0.05) with a slight reduction in Ppa. Increasing the CO2 level supplying to the ECMO from 0.06 to 0.12 did not change either VNO or Ppa despite a decline tendency for NOx accumulation in the perfusate (3.2 ± 0.4 to 2.3 ± 0.4 nmol/min, not significant).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Representative recordings of exhaled NO, FETCO2, and Ppa during alveolar CO2 exposure (A) and intravascular CO2 exposure (B) in a buffer-perfused lung (protocol II). The stepwise increases in FICO2 decreased exhaled NO with a rise in Ppa (A). On the other hand, changes in PvCO2 did not affect either exhaled NO or Ppa (B). Values are means ± SE.

As shown in Fig. 4A, there was significant correlation between FETCO2 and decreases in VNO from its control value (Delta VNO) (r = -0.827, P < 0.01). FETCO2 was significantly correlated also with increases in Ppa from its baseline value (Delta Ppa) (r = 0.650, P < 0.01) as shown in Fig. 4B.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Correlation between FETCO2 and decreases in VNO from the control value (Delta VNO; A) or increases in Ppa from the baseline value (Delta Ppa; B). FETCO2 significantly correlates with Delta VNO (r = -0.827, P < 0.01) and with Delta Ppa (r = 0.650, P < 0.01).

Combination of Hypoxia and Hypercapnia in Buffer-perfused Lungs

A representative recording of protocol III is shown in Fig. 5. Exhaled NO was reduced along with a gradually progressive decrease in FIO2 with an increase in Ppa in normocapnia (FICO2 = 0.06) (left). When FICO2 was switched to 0.12 (hypercapnia), the progressive hypoxia induced a further decrease in exhaled NO and a more marked rise in Ppa compared with those during normocapnia (right). The results obtained during normoxia and at the end point of progressive hypoxia are summarized in Table 3. During the entire experimental period, Ppv and Paw did not change, and isohydric conditions of prelung perfusate were maintained. During normocapnia, hypoxia evoked an elevation in Ppa from 9.6 ± 0.5 to 12.3 ± 0.5 mmHg (28% from the baseline) with a reduction in VNO from 94.8 ± 4.2 to 26.2 ± 3.1 nl/min. On the other hand, during hypercapnia, hypoxia increased Ppa from 10.0 ± 0.3 to 15.0 ± 1.5 mmHg (50% from the baseline) with a decrease in VNO from 67.0 ± 7.0 to 18.9 ± 1.7 nl/min.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   A representative recording of protocol III (gradual hypoxia exposure during hypercapnia). Exhaled NO was reduced along with a gradually progressive decrease in inspired O2 fraction (FIO2) with an increase in Ppa during normocapnia (left). When FICO2 was changed to 0.12 (hypercapnia), progressive hypoxia induced a further decrease in exhaled NO and a more marked rise in Ppa compared with those of normocapnia (right).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Effect of alveolar hypercapnia on VNO, Ppa, and blood-gas analysis during normoxia and at the end point of gradual hypoxia

Figure 6 displays the effect of hypercapnia on the pressor response (Delta Ppa) to various degrees of hypoxia. When FIO2 decreased below 0.06, hypercapnia significantly enhanced the pressor response to hypoxia. Figure 7 illustrates the VNO response to FIO2 during normocapnia and hypercapnia. VNO decreased curvilinearly along with gradual decreases in FIO2 from 0.2 to 0 under normocapnic condition. Hypercapnia caused a downward shift of this curve. Mean VNO values at FIO2 of 0 were 26.2 nl/min during normocapnia and 18.9 nl/min during hypercapnia. To analyze the effect of hypercapnia on the kinetics of the relationships between FIO2 and VNO, we subtracted 26.2 and 18.9 nl/min from all the data and replotted the data using a double-reciprocal method (Fig. 8). The apparent value of Km for O2 during normocapnia was not different from that during hypercapnia (14.4 vs. 14.9 µM), whereas Vmax was significantly decreased from 66.7 to 55.6 nl/min by alveolar hypercapnia.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effects of hypercapnia on the pressor response (Delta Ppa) to lowering FIO2. When FIO2 decreased below 0.06, hypercapnia significantly enhanced the pressor response to hypoxia compared with normocapnia. Values are means ± SE.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   VNO response to FIO2 during normocapnia and hypercapnia. VNO decreased curvilinearly along with gradually progressive decreasing in FIO2 from 0.2 to 0 during normocapnia. Hypercapnia caused a downward shift of this curve. Mean VNO values at FIO2 = 0 are 24.1 nl/min during normocapnia and 17.7 nl/min during hypercapnia. Values are means ± SE.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Double-reciprocal plots between O2 tension and VNO during normocapnia and hypercapnia. The apparent value of Km for O2 during normocapnia is not different from that during hypercapnia (14.4 vs. 14.9 µM), whereas its Vmax is significantly decreased from 66.7 to 55.6 nl/min by hypercapnia.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Quenching Effect of CO2 on NO Measurements

Inhalation of CO2 gas may lower the reading of the chemiluminescence signal for NO because CO2 and water vapor have some quenching effects on the chemiluminescence process (33). Therefore, before we discuss our results, the influence of CO2 on our NO measurements should be addressed. We found a reduction in the NO reading that was in proportion to an increase in CO2 concentration. The maximum reduction ratio of NO reading was 4.5% at 12% of CO2 concentration (Fig. 1). In terms of the actual measurement in buffer-perfused rabbit lungs, inhalation of 12% CO2 caused a marked decrease in exhaled NO by 35% from the baseline (Table 2). Although we have to take into account the quenching effect of CO2 on the measured values of exhaled NO, the magnitude of this effect seems to be too small to have a major influence on our estimation of the effects of hypercapnia on exhaled NO. In the present study, the average reduction rate of NO reading by quenching was 0.38% per 1% CO2. This reduction rate is less than that of previous report (29), and the American Thoracic Society Board of Directors recommend that the allowable tolerance for quenching should be <1% of NO reading per 1% CO2 (10). Thus we concluded that accuracy of our NO measurements during CO2 inhalation was within the tolerable range for further analysis in the present experimental set-up.

NO Inhibition by CO2

It was demonstrated that inhalation of hypercapnic gas caused a reduction in exhaled NO in rabbits (1, 29) and dogs (7). In contrast, ventilation with hypocapnic gas increased exhaled NO in isolated blood-perfused lungs (8). In the present study, we have further explored the effects of hypercapnia confined to either the alveolar space or intravascular perfusate on the lung NO. Our data indicate that alveolar hypercapnia suppressed both exhaled NO and perfusate NOx, whereas intravascular hypercapnia did not change exhaled NO despite a tendency of perfusate NOx to decline (Table 2). In this experimental setting, exhaled NO is derived mainly from the airway epithelium (18, 27) and perfusate NOx originates mainly from the vascular endothelium (19, 28). Thus we suggest that CO2 could potentially suppress NO production both in the epithelium and the endothelium, but the inhibitory effect on NO synthesis secondary to alveolar CO2 exposure is likely much greater than that due to intravascular CO2 exposure.

NO is enzymatically synthesized by NOS from L-arginine and molecular oxygen by transferring electrons from NADPH (24). Indeed, it has been demonstrated that NO production in the airway is regulated by ambient O2 tension through a mechanism that obeys Michaelis-Menten kinetics (11, 17). In the present study, hypercapnia caused a downward shift of the curve relating VNO and FIO2 (Fig. 7), and double-reciprocal plotting (Fig. 8) indicated that the apparent Km was unaltered by hypercapnia, whereas Vmax was decreased. This kinetic behavior is compatible with noncompetitive inhibition of enzyme (NOS)-substrate (O2) binding. However, to the best of our knowledge, the precise mechanism responsible for NOS inhibition by CO2 remains unknown. The most likely explanation for this phenomenon is an influence of pH change on NOS activity because CO2 can freely cross cell membranes and is promptly catalyzed to H+ and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> by carbonic anhydrase (CA), leading to pH changes. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that NOS activity is markedly decreased when intracellular pH (pHi) changes from 7.2 to 6.8 in cultured human endothelial cells (13) and that neuronal NOS activity of rat brain decreases with low pH because of uncoupling of NADPH oxidation (15). Thus rapid changes in pHi induced by CO2 might be a major determinant for the NOS activity both in the epithelium and the endothelium. The question can be raised as to why epithelial NOS is much more suppressed by hypercapnia than is endothelial NOS. First, it was demonstrated with microelectrode measurements in the rabbit lungs that, when ambient CO2 tension increased from 4 to 100 Torr, alveolar pH decreased from 7.33 to 6.92, indicating CO2-dependent pH changes in the alveolar epithelium (25). However, the pulmonary capillary bed has an intravascular pH equilibrium system due to an action of membrane-bound CA (14). Thus the differential regulation of pHi between the epithelium and the endothelium might be responsible for the difference in alveolar vs. intravascular CO2 on NO production. Second, at least seven different CA isozymes have been identified, differing in their tissue distributions and subcellular localization. Of these isozymes, CA type II or III is dominant in the alveolar and bronchial epithelium, whereas CA type IV localizes mainly to the capillary endothelium (30). These various subtypes have been shown to have different catalytic activities and pharmacological sensitivities (30). Thus these different distributions of CA subtypes might, in part, account for the differential regulation of NOS activity by CO2. Another possible explanation is that the CO2 molecule itself might directly bind to a different site than substrate O2 in the enzyme, inducing a conformational change in NOS. However, this cannot fully explain the differential regulation of NOS activity in the present experiment. Further study will be necessary to clarify this mechanism.

Regulation of Pulmonary Circulation by CO2 via NO

The effect of CO2 on the pulmonary circulation remains controversial. Several investigators addressed the pulmonary vasoconstrictor action of hypercapnia via increased H+ concentration in a wide variety of species and preparations (5, 16, 21), whereas others found conflicting evidence that the CO2 molecule per se directly dilates smooth muscles of pulmonary vessels with an action similar to that reported in the systemic circulation (6, 34). Thus it has been suggested that the pulmonary pressor response to hypercapnia may be the net result of vasoconstriction due to increased H+ concentration and vasodilation due to increased CO2 tension (32). In the present study with blood perfusion, we found that intravascular hypercapnia increased resting Ppa significantly, indicating that vasoconstrictor action of CO2 contributed much more to the pressor response than vasodilator action of CO2 in this species and preparation. In support of this, Baudouin and Evans (4) showed dual vasomotor actions of CO2, in which, at low resting Ppa, CO2 is a mild vasoconstrictor, whereas, at higher vascular tone, it acts as a dilator. Furthermore, Yamaguchi et al. (36) demonstrated recently in isolated perfused rat lungs that intravascular hypercapnia elicited a small increment of Ppa despite a significant dilatation of pulmonary venules by using a precise confocal microscopic observation system.

With regard to the endothelial NO production in response to CO2, it was demonstrated that a NOS inhibitor attenuated hypercapnia-induced tension development in the isolated pulmonary arterial ring preparation, suggesting that vasoconstrictor effects induced by hypercapnia were caused by a reduction in endothelial NO release (22). The present results demonstrated that, in buffer-perfused lungs, alveolar hypercapnia markedly reduced perfusate NOx accumulation with a rise in Ppa, whereas intravascular hypercapnia did not elicit these effects. Endothelial NOS seems to function normally in the present experiment because our laboratory has previously demonstrated in the same preparation that endothelial NO production increases in response to acetylcholine or increments of perfusate flow (26). During buffer perfusion, the pulmonary vascular tone is lower than that during blood perfusion and vascular responsiveness may be blunted because of the low viscosity and/or hematocrit (35). Thus it may be interpreted that the less resting shear stress accounts for the small changes in Ppa and perfusate NOx induced by hypercapnia, although CO2 can potentially inhibit NO production in the endothelium.

Concerning the site of action of CO2, Hyman and Kadowitz (16) demonstrated using a crossover lung perfusion system in the intact lamb that alveolar hypercapnia evoked marked pulmonary vasoconstriction, whereas intravascular hypercapnia elicited modest vasodilation, suggesting that alveolar CO2 might stimulate sensory sites in the alveolar-capillary-venous region, leading to pulmonary vasoconstriction. The novel findings from the present study are that, in both blood- and buffer-perfused lungs, alveolar hypercapnia elicited a pronounced elevation in Ppa compared with intravascular hypercapnia and that this vasoconstriction is associated with corresponding decreases in exhaled NO. In contrast to the hypercapnia, alveolar hypocapnia decreased Ppa accompanied by increments of exhaled NO. It has been demonstrated that intrinsic NO released from the airway epithelium can control pulmonary vascular tone (17). Thus it is conceivable that alveolar CO2 might modulate the pulmonary vascular tone secondarily via alterations in airway NO release in addition to its direct action on pulmonary vessels. Moreover, as described previously, the biological actions of CO2 are mediated by rapid changes in pH due to catalytic activity of lung CA. Swenson et al. (31) demonstrated that local ventilation and perfusion are regulated by the local H+ concentration induced by the local CO2 tension via the CA action, suggesting that lung CA plays a significant role in maintaining VA/Q matching in the pulmonary circulation. In this regard, we speculate that alterations in CO2 tension might change pHi primarily by lung CA followed by changes in NOS activity. Consequently, we postulate that high concentrations of CO2 in a hypoventilated area would decrease airway NO, leading to pulmonary vasoconstriction, whereas low CO2 concentrations in hyperventilated area would increase NO, leading to pulmonary vasodilation, resulting in an improvement of VA/Q matching.

Furthermore, we found that alveolar hypercapnia enhanced HPV under isohydric conditions in the prelung perfusate, which was accompanied by further suppression of exhaled NO (Figs. 4 and 5). In the literature, the effect of hypercapnia on HPV has been reported to be controversial, with evidence for vasoconstriction (2, 23) or vasodilation (4, 6). The present results confirm those of Malik and Kidd (23), who showed that, in intact anesthetized dogs, pulmonary vascular resistance increased when hypercapnia with a normal extracellular fluid pH was imposed during hypoxia. Isohydric hypercapnia is frequently observed in chronic lung disease as a result of renal compensation, and this condition plays a significant role in mediating pulmonary hypertension. Regarding the vasodilator action of NO, it is likely that a further reduction in airway NO by alveolar hypercapnia partly accounts for the enhancement of HPV. In chronic lung disease, narrowed airways and poorly ventilated alveoli distribute unevenly. In such areas, CO2 accumulates and O2 fraction decreases in accord with the severity of local hypoventilation. These local conditions would lead to a much greater deficiency of NO production, resulting in a further enhancement of HPV, diverting blood flow away from poorly ventilated areas, thereby bringing about an improvement of VA/Q matching. Thus we conclude that the combination of alveolar hypercapnia and hypoxia may play a significant role in the regulation of pulmonary circulation via alterations in airway NO production.

In conclusion, we found that CO2 inhalation decreased exhaled NO and simultaneously induced pulmonary vasoconstriction, suggesting that CO2 regulates pulmonary circulation via NO released from the epithelium. Furthermore, alveolar CO2 enhanced the hypoxic pressor response with a further reduction in exhaled NO. From these results, we speculate that the combination of hypercapnia and hypoxia in poorly ventilated alveoli would lead to a deficiency of NO production, resulting in an enhancement of local hypoxic vasoconstriction and thereby an improvement of VA/Q matching. Although the precise mechanism is unknown, it is likely that alveolar CO2 inhibits airway epithelial NOS activity via changes in pHi. However, further study is necessary to answer these questions.


    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: H. Nakano, Dept. of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical College, 2-1-1-1, Midorigaoka-Higashi, Asahikawa 078-8510, Japan (E-mail: kin{at}asahikawa-med.ac.jp).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 12 January 2001; accepted in final form 30 April 2001.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Adding, LC, Agvald P, Persson MG, and Gustafsson LE. Regulation of pulmonary nitric oxide by carbon dioxide is intrinsic to the lung. Acta Physiol Scand 167: 167-174, 1999[ISI][Medline].

2.   Barer, GR, Howard P, and Shaw JW. Stimulus-response curves for the pulmonary vascular bed to hypoxia and hypercapnia. J Physiol (Lond) 211: 139-155, 1970[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Barnard, JW, Wilson PS, Moore TM, Thompson WJ, and Taylor AE. Effect of nitric oxide and cyclooxygenase products on vascular resistance in dog and rat lungs. J Appl Physiol 74: 2940-2948, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Baudouin, SV, and Evans TW. Action of carbon dioxide on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in the rat lung: evidence against specific endothelium-derived relaxing factor-mediated vasodilation. Crit Care Med 21: 740-746, 1993[ISI][Medline].

5.   Bergofsky, EH, Haas F, and Porcelli R. Determination of the sensitive vascular sites from which hypoxia and hypercapnia elicit rises in pulmonary arterial pressure. Fed Proc 27: 1420-1425, 1968[ISI][Medline].

6.   Brimioulle, S, Lejeune P, Vachiery JL, Leeman M, Melot C, and Naeije R. Effects of acidosis and alkalosis on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in dogs. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 258: H347-H353, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Brogan, TV, Hedges RG, McKinney S, Robertson HT, Hlastala MP, and Swenson ER. Pulmonary NO synthase inhibition and inspired CO2: effects on V'/Q' and pulmonary blood flow distribution. Eur Respir J 16: 288-295, 2000[Abstract].

8.   Carlin, RE, Ferrario L, Boyd JT, Camporesi EM, McGraw DJ, and Hakim TS. Determinants of nitric oxide in exhaled gas in the isolated rabbit lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155: 922-927, 1997[Abstract].

9.   Cremona, G, Wood AM, Hall LW, Bower EA, and Higenbottam T. Effect of inhibitors of nitric oxide release and action on vascular tone in isolated lungs of pig, sheep, dog and man. J Physiol (Lond) 481: 185-195, 1994[ISI].

10.   Directors of the American Thoracic Society Board. Recommendations for standardized procedures for the on-line and off-line measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide in adults and children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160: 2104-2117, 1999[Free Full Text].

11.   Dweik, RA, Laskowski D, Abu-Soud HM, Kaneko F, Hutte R, Stuehr DJ, and Erzurum SC. Nitric oxide synthesis in the lung. Regulation by oxygen through a kinetic mechanism. J Clin Invest 101: 660-666, 1998[ISI][Medline].

12.   Fishman, AP. Hypoxia on the pulmonary circulation. How and where it acts. Circ Res 38: 221-231, 1976[ISI][Medline].

13.   Fleming, I, Hecker M, and Busse R. Intracellular alkalinization induced by bradykinin sustains activation of the constitutive nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells. Circ Res 74: 1220-1226, 1994[Abstract].

14.   Geers, C, Heming TA, Gros G, Bidani A, and Crandall ED. Effects of intra- and extracellular carbonic anhydrase on CO2 excretion and intravascular pH equilibrium in the isolated perfused rat lung. Prog Respir Res 21: 26-29, 1986.

15.   Gorren, ACF, Schrammel A, Schmidt K, and Mayer B. Effects of pH on the structure and function of neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Biochem J 331: 801-807, 1998.

16.   Hyman, AL, and Kadowitz PJ. Effects of alveolar and perfusion hypoxia and hypercapnia on pulmonary vascular resistance in the lamb. Am J Physiol 228: 397-403, 1975.

17.   Ide, H, Nakano H, Ogasa T, Osanai S, Kikuchi K, and Iwamoto J. Regulation of pulmonary circulation by alveolar oxygen tension via airway nitric oxide. J Appl Physiol 87: 1629-1636, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Iwamoto, J, Pendergast DR, Suzuki H, and Krasney JA. Effect of graded exercise on nitric oxide in expired air in humans. Respir Physiol 97: 333-345, 1994[ISI][Medline].

19.   Kantrow, SP, Huang YC, Whorton AR, Grayck EN, Knight JM, Millington DS, and Piantadosi CA. Hypoxia inhibits nitric oxide synthesis in isolated rabbit lung. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 272: L1167-L1173, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Kobzik, L, Bredt DS, Lowenstein CJ, Drazen J, Gaston B, Sugarbaker D, and Stamler JS. Nitric oxide synthase in human and rat lung: immunocytochemical and histochemical localization. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 9: 371-377, 1993.

21.   Koyama, T, and Hiramoto M. Pulmonary microcirculatory response to localized hypercapnia. J Appl Physiol 53: 1556-1564, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Lynch, F, Sweeney M, O'Regan RG, and McLoughlin P. Hypercapnia-induced contraction in isolated pulmonary arteries is endothelium-dependent. Respir Physiol 121: 65-74, 2000[ISI][Medline].

23.   Malik, AB, and Kidd BS. Independent effects of changes in H+ and CO2 concentrations on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. J Appl Physiol 34: 318-323, 1973[Free Full Text].

24.   Nathan, C. Nitric oxide as a secretory product of mammalian cells. FASEB J 6: 3051-3064, 1992[Abstract].

25.   Nielson, DW, Goerke J, and Clements JA. Alveolar subphase pH in the lungs of anesthetized rabbits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 7119-7123, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].

26.   Ogasa, T, Nakano H, Ide H, Yamamoto Y, Sasaki N, Osanai S, Akiba Y, Kikuchi K, and Iwamoto J. Flow-mediated release of nitric oxide in isolated perfused rabbit lungs. J Appl Physiol 91: 363-370, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].

27.   Phillips, CR, Giraud GD, and Holden WE. Exhaled nitric oxide during exercise: site of release and modulation by ventilation and blood flow. J Appl Physiol 80: 1865-1871, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28.   Spriestersbach, R, Grimminger F, Weissmann N, Walmrath D, and Seeger W. On-line measurement of nitric oxide generation in buffer-perfused rabbit lungs. J Appl Physiol 78: 1502-1508, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

29.   Stromberg, S, Lonnqvist PA, Persson MG, and Gustafsson LE. Lung distension and carbon dioxide affect pulmonary nitric oxide formation in the anaesthetized rabbit. Acta Physiol Scand 159: 59-67, 1997[ISI][Medline].

30.   Swenson, ER. Respiratory and renal roles of carbonic anhydrase in gas exchange and acid-base regulation. In: The Carbonic Anhydrases: New Horizons, edited by Chegwidden WR, Carter ND, and Edwards YH.. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2000, p. 281-341.

31.   Swenson, ER, Robertson HT, and Hlastala MP. Effects of carbonic anhydrase inhibition on ventilation-perfusion matching in the dog lung. J Clin Invest 92: 702-709, 1993.

32.   Sylvester, JT, Rock P, Gottlieb JE, and Wetzel RC. Acute hypoxic responses. In: Abnormal Pulmonary Circulation, edited by Bergofsky EH.. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1986, p. 127-165.

33.   Tidona, RJ, Nizami AA, and Cernansky NP. Reducing interference effects in the chemiluminescent measurement of nitric oxides from combustion systems. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 38: 806-811, 1988.

34.   Viles, PH, and Shepherd JT. Evidence for a dilator action of carbon dioxide on the pulmonary vessels of the cat. Circ Res 22: 325-332, 1968[Abstract].

35.   Wilson, PS, Khimenko P, Moore TM, and Taylor AE. Perfusate viscosity and hematocrit determine pulmonary vascular responsiveness to NO synthase inhibitors. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 270: H1757-H1765, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

36.   Yamaguchi, K, Suzuki K, Naoki K, Nishio K, Sato N, Takeshita K, Kudo H, Aoki T, Suzuki Y, Miyata A, and Tsumura H. Response of intra-acinar pulmonary microvessels to hypoxia, hypercapnic acidosis, and isocapnic acidosis. Circ Res 82: 722-728, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].


J APPL PHYSIOL 91(3):1121-1130
8750-7587/01 $5.00 Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
D.A. Kregenow and E.R. Swenson
The lung and carbon dioxide: implications for permissive and therapeutic hypercapnia
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2002; 20(1): 6 - 11.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
H. Nakano, H. Ide, T. Ogasa, S. Osanai, M. Imada, S. Nonaka, K. Kikuchi, and J. Iwamoto
Ambient oxygen regulates epithelial metabolism and nitric oxide production in the human nose
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2002; 93(1): 189 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Iwamoto, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Iwamoto, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online