Vol. 91, Issue 2, 912-918, August 2001
Mechanical stimulation induces pp125FAK and
pp60src activity in an in vivo model of
trabecular bone formation
Maria R.
Moalli,
Suquing
Wang,
Nancy J.
Caldwell,
Pravin V.
Patil, and
Craig R.
Maynard
Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
 |
ABSTRACT |
Utilizing an in vivo model of
trabecular bone formation, we demonstrated the temporal and spatial
activation of pp125FAK in response to specific mechanical
load stimuli. Bone chambers equipped with hydraulic actuators were
aseptically inserted into each proximal tibial metaphysis of adult,
male dogs under general anesthesia. The load stimulus consisted of a
trapezoidal waveform, with a maximum compressive load of 17.8 N,
loading rate of 89 N/s, at 1 Hz frequency. One chamber was loaded for 2 (120 cycles), 15 (900 cycles), or 30 min (1,800 cycles), whereas the
contralateral chamber served as unloaded control. Bone chambers were
biopsied at postload time points of 0, 15, and 45 min. Load-induced
activation of FAK was rapid, and the duration of activation was
dependent on the number of applied load cycles. Mechanical stimulation
increased the association of FAK with Src and the time course of
complex formation paralleled the temporal activation of FAK. Evaluation of cryosections revealed prominent FAK immunoreactivity among marrow
fibroblasts and stromal cells.
mechanotransduction; tyrosine phosphorylation; animal model
 |
INTRODUCTION |
MECHANICAL SIGNAL
TRANSDUCTION has a significant influence on the biological
processes of a variety of cell types, including smooth muscle cells
(25), endothelial cells (8, 9, 12, 33), and
bone cells (14). This process, also known as
mechanotransduction, involves the conversion of a biophysical force
into the cellular/molecular response leading to both rapid changes in
kinase-mediated gene expression, as well as slower adaptive changes in
cytoskeletal arrangement. The mechanisms for the coupling of cell-level
mechanical signals into intracellular biochemical signals are currently
under intense investigation, and several candidate pathways have been proposed. These include force transduction through stretch-activated cation channels within the plasma membrane, G protein-coupled calcium-dependent pathways mediated by phospholipase C and protein kinase C signaling cascades, direct nuclear matrix interactions with
mechanical stress response elements yet to be identified, calcium-independent pathways involving intracellular kinase activation, and finally integrin-mediated transduction through the cytoskeleton (1, 3).
The integrins, a family of transmembrane heterodimeric glycoproteins,
are the major cellular receptors for many extracellular matrix proteins
and are perhaps the most well studied group of proposed force
transducers (19). Because of their physical
interconnection with the cytoskeleton, integrins are proposed to
facilitate a series of protein-protein interactions extending from the
extracellular matrix to the intracellular filamentous cytoskeleton.
Ingber (20) proposed that alterations in cell shape and
subsequent gene expression are therefore regulated by
integrin-extracellular matrix associations that determine the tensional
integrity (tensegrity) of the cell. Because of this cellular structural
configuration, a load stimulus would be rapidly propagated across the
cell, evoking a variety of signaling cascades to elicit a biochemical
response. In fact, studies have demonstrated that cellular attachment
to the extracellular matrix plays an important role in the regulation
of cellular proliferation, differentiation, morphogenesis, and gene
expression (2, 21, 24). Thus integrins appear to function
as signaling receptors (18) that elicit biochemical
signals via close association with intracellular proteins
(30), induction of tyrosine phosphorylation (6), and increases in intracellular calcium
(36) upon stimulation. A variety of integrin subunits have
been demonstrated in bone, including
2
1
which binds collagen (18),
1 and
v
5 in osteoblasts (11, 15,
29) and
v
3 in osteoclasts and
endothelial cells (11, 17, 13). The
subunit
mediates the association with structural intracellular proteins in
localized attachment domains or "focal adhesions"
(28). These focal adhesion complexes contain actin-associated proteins such as talin, vinculin, paxillin, and
-actinin (5) as well as several protein kinases
(10). The focal adhesion kinase (FAK) appears to play a
central role in integrin-mediated signal transduction. This kinase is
tyrosine-phosphorylated, and its tyrosine kinase activity is enhanced
upon integrin engagement (30). Once phosphorylated, FAK is
able to couple with several SH2/SH3
domain-containing proteins and thus trigger a complex cascade of signal
transduction events.
Investigations designed to delineate the molecular mechanisms of
mechanical signal transduction in bone in vivo are challenging. In
contrast to in vitro studies, however, an in vivo model provides an
environment with the appropriate osteoprogenitor cell population, normal blood supply, and a mechanical strain environment to tissue with
more material cell-matrix interactions. We have developed an in vivo
bone chamber model of intramembranous osteogenesis and adaptation
(16, 23) for investigations of mechanical signal transduction at the molecular level (23). The unique
feature of the bone chamber is that the hydraulic cap can be activated to apply a controlled compressive force on the trabecular bone that has
formed within its walls. Utilizing this model, we demonstrate the
temporal and spatial activation of FAK in response to specific mechanical load stimuli. We have begun to delineate the downstream events triggered by its activation in a microenvironment characteristic of trabecular bone in vivo (23).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Surgical procedure.
This study utilized skeletally mature, male canines housed at the
AAALAC accredited (Association for Assessment and Accreditation of
Laboratory Animal Care), animal facility at the University of Michigan.
Before surgery, all dogs were premedicated with a cocktail consisting
of butorphanol tartrate (100 mg, Torbugesic), acepromazine maleate (25 mg, Vedco, St. Joseph, MO), glycopyrrolate (5 mg, American Regent
Laboratories, Shirley, NY), and 0.9% saline (added as a vehicle to
bring the total volume to 50 ml). The cocktail was administered
intramuscularly at a dosage of 0.1 mg/kg, 20 min before induction with
thiopental sodium (Pentothal, 17.5 mg/kg, iv, to effect). Anesthesia
was maintained by inhalation with isoflurane (Aerrane). The
analgesics/anti-inflammatory medications, buprenorphine (Buprenex,
0.01-0.05 mg/kg iv/im) and carprofen (Rimadyl, 1 mg/lb, per os)
were administered perioperatively as needed. All of the surgical
procedures and experimental protocols were approved by the University
of Michigan Committee on the Care and Use of Animals.
The hydraulic bone chamber design, as previously described
(16), consists of a hollowed titanium cylinder with an
internal volume of 269 mm3, a 7/16-14 threaded
exterior, and two large transverse portals to allow bone tissue
infiltration. The components of the bone chamber model, including an
extracted specimen, are presented in Fig.
1. The chamber was surgically inserted
into the proximal tibial metaphysis of adult male canines. By utilizing
the threaded exterior and a medial approach, a chamber was screwed into
each tibia until flush with the bone surface. The opposite lateral cortex was not broached, and the chamber was aligned so that the portals were oriented with the long axis of the tibia. A hemispherical cap was used to seal the chamber, and the wound was closed routinely. Dogs were allowed normal cage activity for 4 wk, after which a specially designed coring tool was used to extract the entire contents
of the chamber. This 4-wk extraction is performed to eliminate the
effects of surgical trauma from the initial chamber insertion and any
influences that the wound healing process may have had on the
developing tissue. Therefore, the 4-wk biopsy establishes the baseline
or time zero for all subsequent extractions. A more detailed
description of the bone chamber model is found elsewhere (16,
23).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The titanium bone chamber is designed as a hollow screw
with large portals for tissue infiltration. Components include the main
body, loading piston, and hydraulic cap. The loading mechanism works by
application of fluid pressure against the piston, which then applies
direct force to the tissue within the chamber. The cylindrical specimen
of bone that is repeatedly extracted from the chamber measures ~6 mm
in length and diameter.
|
|
After 8 wk of tissue infiltration in the chamber, the servohydraulic
loading mechanism was activated (16) to apply a controlled compressive load to the woven trabecular bone that formed in one chamber. The contralateral chamber served as an unloaded control. The
hydraulic actuator was activated in the operating room, and dogs
remained anesthetized during loading.
The loading mechanism works by the application of hydraulic fluid
pressure against a piston, which then applies direct mechanical force
to the tissue in the chamber. The fluid pressure is generated via an
external microcomputer-controlled pump, which is quick connected to the
loading cap. The hydraulic system was calibrated to apply a compressive
load of 17.8 N at a rate of 89 N/s and 1 Hz frequency for an
experimentally specified number of cycles. Criteria for the load
parameters are described elsewhere (16, 23).
After completion of loading, the specimens were removed from the
chamber at a time specified by the experimental design. The dogs then
recovered and were allowed normal cage activity for 8 more weeks of
tissue infiltration. This loading/extraction protocol can be repeated
up to 6 times within each dog, which minimizes biological variability
and the number of animals required for a set of experiments.
Loading experiments.
To determine the temporal activation of FAK, a series of specimens was
extracted from four dogs immediately, 15 min, or 45 min after a single
30-min (1,800 cycles) load stimulus of 17.8 N. Each dog underwent 5 loading/extraction procedures and was randomly assigned to be biopsied
across each of the three postload time points, for a total of 20 loading experiments. Specifically, eight pairs of specimens were
evaluated immediately after the 1,800 cycle load stimulus, six pairs of
specimens were evaluated at 15 min, and six pairs of specimens were
evaluated at the 45-min time point. The experimental flow is depicted
in Fig. 2.

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Experimental flow of the bone chamber model to
demonstrate the temporal activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in
response to a mechanical load stimulus. The load/extraction procedure
was performed up to 5 times in each dog. Results of these experiments
are presented in Fig. 4.
|
|
To determine the threshold mechanical stimulus that activated FAK and
to determine whether the 30-min time window was critical for FAK
activation, a series of specimens was extracted from four additional
dogs as depicted in the experimental flow diagram shown in Fig.
3. The experiments were designed to
determine whether the load duration of 30 min (1,800 cycles) was the
stimulus for FAK activation or whether it was simply a matter of
harvesting within the postload time frame of 30 min. Sixteen loading
experiments were conducted in which 1,800 cycles (30 min), 900 cycles
(15 min), or 120 cycles (2 min) of load stimulus were applied.
Specimens were then extracted either immediately or after a delay so
that the total time from the initiation of loading to extraction
equaled 30 min. Four pairs of specimens were extracted immediately
after the 1,800 cycle load stimulus, seven pairs of specimens were
extracted after 900 cycles of load, and five pairs of specimens were
extracted after the 120-cycle load stimulus.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Experimental flow of the studies designed to determine
the threshold mechanical stimulus for FAK activation. In these studies,
the duration of the load stimulus was varied as shown, and specimens
were extracted within a postload time frame of 30 min. Results of these
experiments are presented in Fig. 5.
|
|
Incidentally, the load magnitude, rate, and frequency were not varied,
because the loading parameters used were shown during the development
of the model to induce a significant adaptive response (as opposed to a
damage or nonresponse) by the cells within the chamber. We did
hypothesize, however, that the mechanical stimulus (17.8 N, 1 Hz) may
be activating FAK after just a few load cycles, because tyrosine kinase
activity is induced fairly rapidly in response to mechanical load in in
vitro experimental settings.
Antibodies.
Monoclonal antibodies to FAK (mouse monoclonal anti-FAK, clones 2a7 and
4.47) and Src (mouse monoclonal anti-Src) were purchased from Upstate
Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). Monoclonal antibody to phosphotyrosine
(PY20) was purchased from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY).
Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies, goat anti-mouse
and goat anti-rabbit, were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology and
Pierce Chemical (Rockford, IL), respectively.
Immunocytochemistry.
Harvested specimens were immersed in 10% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA-MW:
30,000-70,000; Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) for 1 h. They
were then slow cooled for 5 min by immersion in n-hexane (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA) which has been
chilled to
70°C in a dry ice-alcohol slurry. Several 5- to 7-µm
cryosections were taken, and the specimens were subsequently snap
frozen in liquid nitrogen for immunoprecipitation and Western blotting
as described below. Mounted cryosections were fixed in 10% neutral
buffered formalin, washed in PBS, then incubated with blocking solution
(1% BSA, 0.3% Tween-20, 10% normal horse serum in PBS) at room
temperature. Slides were then incubated with monoclonal anti-FAK
antibody (clone 2a7; 1 µg/ml at a 1:100 dilution) in a humid chamber
at 4°C overnight. Slides were washed in PBS and then incubated with
biotinylated anti-mouse IgG (2.5 µg/ml, 1:200 dilution, in 1% BSA,
0.3% Tween-20) at room temperature. FAK immunoreactivity was
visualized with an alkaline phosphatase-streptavidin-substrate detection method (Vector Red, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and
counterstaining with hematoxylin.
Cell lysis, immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting.
Harvested specimens were pulverized in a liquid nitrogen-cooled mortar
and pestle, followed by homogenization (Polytron, Brinkman Instruments,
Westbury, NY), in 2 ml ice-cold cell lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.4; 1% NP-40; 0.25% sodium deoxycholate; 150 mM NaCl; 1 mM EGTA; 1 mM PMSF; 1 µg/ml aprotinin, leupeptin, pepstatin; 1 mM
Na3VO4; 1 mM NaF). Insoluble material was
removed by centrifugation (9,500 rpm, for 15 min at 4°C), and the
supernatants were assayed for total protein concentration with a
commercially available kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Paired
samples (loaded and unloaded) were adjusted to the same concentration of protein (75 µg) in a total volume of 1 ml for each sample. Monoclonal FAK antibody (clone 2a7; 4 µl at l µg/µl) was added to
the protein lysates and incubated on a shaker at 4°C, overnight. Antibodies were collected on protein G agarose beads (Calbiochem, La
Jolla, CA). The precipitated protein complexes were washed three times
with PBS, then resuspended in 50 µl of 2× Laemmli buffer with 10%
2-mercaptoethanol. The immunoprecipitates were resolved on an 8%
SDS-PAGE gel and electrophoretically transferred to a nitrocellulose
membrane (at 200 mA for 4 h). The filters were rinsed briefly in
TBS without Tween 20, then blocked in Blotto (5% non-fat dry milk,
Bio-Rad) at 4°C overnight. The blots were incubated with the
appropriate antibody (1 µg/ml, diluted 1:600 of antiphosphotyrosine;
1:100 anti-FAK, clone 4.47; 1:20,000 anti-Src) on a shaker at 4°C
overnight. The filters were washed 5 times in TBS-Tween 20, then
incubated (in Blotto) with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit IgG (diluted 1:2,000) or goat anti-mouse IgG (diluted
1:8,000) (Pierce Chemical) on a shaker at room temperature for 1 h. The blots were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescent detection
(ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, or SuperSignal,
Pierce Chemical).
Quantitative data analysis.
The immunoblots were quantitated by a method of relative densities. A
flat-bed scanner with light box attachment was used to make
high-resolution digital copies of each gel. Densitometry was performed
by use of NIH Image 1.61, and the Gel Plotting macro algorithm was used
to calculate spot intensities from digitized gel image files.
Background subtraction was performed by using regions adjacent to each
spot. Thus spot intensities that were calibrated to the background were
used in all further calculations. Each gel was evaluated separately. By
use of this method, the loaded vs. unloaded blot on each gel was
compared to determine a nondimensional ratio (loaded/unloaded). A ratio
>1 indicated increased activation in loaded specimens compared with
unloaded specimens in response to the mechanical load stimulus.
 |
RESULTS |
Tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK in response to mechanical load.
These studies were based on the hypothesis that cyclic compressive
loading induces the tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK in a time-dependent
manner. In six out of eight loading experiments in which pairs of
specimens were extracted immediately after a 30-min load stimulus (17.8 N at 89 N/s, 1,800 cycles at 1 Hz), the Western blot analysis
demonstrated a significant increase in FAK phosphorylation in loaded
specimens compared with the contralateral controls (Fig.
4). There was decreased phosphorylation
of FAK in six out of six pairs of specimens evaluated at 15 and 45 min compared with the immediate time point (Fig. 4). The effects of changing the duration of the load stimulus by varying the number of
applied load cycles and harvesting either immediately, or within the
30-min time window are shown in Fig. 5.
There was increased phosphorylation of FAK in three out of four pairs
of loaded specimens harvested immediately after loading for 30 min
(Fig. 5A). A 15-min load stimulus (900 cycles) also elicited
FAK phosphorylation above baseline levels in 7 pairs of specimens
regardless of whether the specimens were harvested immediately (3 out
of 4 experiments) (Fig. 5B), or after a 15-min delay (2 out
of 3 experiments) (Fig. 5A and B). A load
stimulus of 120 cycles (2 min) never resulted in activation of FAK in
five pairs of specimens that were harvested immediately (0 out of 3 experiments) (Fig. 5B) or after a 28-min delay (0 out of 2 experiments) (Fig. 5A).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of mechanical load on the temporal activation of
FAK. Dogs were implanted with a bone chamber in each tibia. For each
experiment, one chamber was randomly selected to be loaded (L) and the
opposite chamber was the unloaded (UL) control. The unloaded chamber
was always biopsied before loading to prevent cross talk between
chambers. Twenty pairs of specimens were extracted immediately, 15, or
45 min after the mechanical load stimulus (17.8 N at 89 N/s, 1,800 cycles at 1 Hz). Specimens were homogenized, and pp125FAK
was immunoprecipitated from 75 µg of cell lysate with anti-FAK
monoclonal antibody (clone 2A7). Immunoprecipitates were resolved by
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with PY20. Tyrosine phosphorylation was
visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence. Blots were analyzed by
densitometry as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. A ratio
>1 indicates activation in response to mechanical stimulation.
|
|

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
FAK activation is dependent on a specific load stimulus
and not on a response window of 30 min. Dogs were implanted with a bone
chamber in each tibia. For each experiment, 1 chamber was randomly
selected as L and the opposite chamber was the UL control. The UL
chamber was always biopsied before loading to prevent cross talk
between chambers. Twelve pairs of specimens were extracted after load
durations of 30 min (1,800 cycles) (A), 15 min (900 cycles)
(A and B), or 2 min (120 cycles) (A
and B). Specimens were extracted either immediately
(A and B), 15 (A and B), or
28 (A) minutes after the load stimulus. Specimens were
homogenized, and pp125FAK was immunoprecipitated from 75 µg of cell lysate with anti-FAK monoclonal antibody (clone 2A7,
Upstate Biotechnology). Immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE
and immunoblotted with PY20 (Transduction Laboratories). Tyrosine
phosphorylation was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence. Blots
were analyzed by densitometry as described in MATERIALS AND
METHODS. A ratio >1 indicates activation in response to
mechanical stimulation.
|
|
As demonstrated in Fig. 6, mechanical
stimulation did not increase FAK protein expression above unloaded
control levels. This indicated that the increase in tyrosine
phosphorylation in loaded specimens was not simply due to an increase
in FAK protein.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
FAK protein levels did not change in response to
mechanical load stimuli of 1,800, 900, or 120 cycles. Matching aliquots
of protein from the specimens analyzed in Figs. 4 (A) and 5 (B) were used to immunoprecipitate FAK with an anti-FAK
monoclonal antibody (clone 2A7, Upstate Biotechnology).
Immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with a
monoclonal FAK antibody (clone 4.47, Upstate Biotechnology). FAK
protein was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence.
|
|
Mechanical stimulation induces the association of Src with FAK.
FAK contains several tyrosine residues that are located in amino acid
sequences arranged in motifs for binding SH2 domains. Tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK is proposed to create the formation of
signaling complexes via the initial recruitment of the SH2 domain-containing protein Src to the phosphorylated tyrosine residue. Thus it was hypothesized that the formation of Src-FAK complexes would
parallel the time course of FAK activation.
To investigate whether mechanical load-induced phosphorylation of FAK
was accompanied by an increased association of Src, FAK
immunoprecipitates from the above experiments were immunoblotted with
polyclonal anti-Src. Aliquots of protein from six pairs of specimens
that demonstrated FAK activation in the experiments depicted in Fig. 5
were analyzed for FAK-Src coimmunoprecipitation. As demonstrated in
Fig. 7, mechanical load induced FAK-Src
complexes in two out of two pairs of specimens extracted immediately
after an 1,800-cycle load stimulus. FAK-Src complex formation was also increased above control levels when four pairs of specimens were loaded
for 900 cycles and collected immediately (2 out of 2) or after a 15-min
delay (2 out of 2).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Mechanical load induced an increase in FAK-Src complexes.
FAK was immunoprecipitated from matching aliquots of protein from 6 pairs of specimens, which demonstrated increased FAK activation as
depicted in Fig. 5. Immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and
blotted with polyclonal anti-Src antibody (Upstate Biotechnology).
Blots were analyzed by densitometry as described in MATERIALS AND
METHODS. A ratio >1 indicates activation in response to
mechanical stimulation.
|
|
FAK immunoreactivity is limited to the marrow space.
To determine which bone cells might be responding to mechanical
stimulation, cryosections were taken from three pairs of specimens before immunoblotting and were stained with a monoclonal antibody to
FAK. Cryosections revealed prominent FAK immunoreactivity among marrow
fibroblasts and stromal cells (Fig. 8).
There was no immunostaining associated with osteoblastic cells on
trabecular surfaces or within osteocytic lacunae. Qualitatively, there
were no detectable differences in the amount of FAK staining between
loaded (1,800 or 900 cycles) and unloaded specimens, which is
consistent with the finding that there was no increase in FAK protein
with loading.

View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
FAK immunoreactivity was limited
to the marrow space. Serial cryosections were taken from 3 pairs of
frozen specimens before homogenization for immunoblotting. Slides were
incubated with monoclonal anti-FAK antibody (1 µg/ml at a 1:100
dilution), and FAK immunoreactivity was visualized with an alkaline
phosphatase-streptavidin-substrate detection method (Vector Red, Vector
Laboratories) as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS.
"Red" FAK immunostaining was evident among marrow stromal cells and
fibroblasts. ×40 objective.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
This study demonstrated that induction of tyrosine phosphorylation
of FAK occurs in response to specific mechanical load stimuli. In this
in vivo model, the threshold for mechanical stimulation of FAK
phosphorylation appeared to lie between 120 and 900 cycles of an
applied load of 17.8 N.
FAK can autophosphorylate at tyrosine residue 397 and can be
phosphorylated at a number of other residues such as Y407,
Y577, and Y925 by other protein tyrosine
kinases. Thus it is possible that mechanical load could induce tyrosine
phosphorylation of FAK either at Y397 or at an as yet
unknown tyrosine residue. This would create high-affinity binding sites
for SH2 domain-containing proteins such as Src. In this
study, Src coimmunuoprecipitated with FAK, and this association was
coincident with FAK activation. In addition, mechanical stimulation induced an increase in FAK-Src coimmunoprecipitates above control levels. The data suggest, therefore, that there was an increase in
focal adhesion complex formation in response to mechanical load. The
persistent activation of FAK 15 min after a load stimulus of 900 cycles
is consistent with the observation that FAK-Src association leads to
the recruitment of other signaling molecules to the complex, with
subsequent transphosphorylation of FAK at additional tyrosine residues.
Specific phosphotyrosine antibodies, such as Y397,
Y576, Y577, and Y925, are now
available (Biosource, Camarillo, CA), and these could be utilized in
future experiments.
Fibronectin stimulation of FAK in vitro has been shown to decrease over
time coincident with the formation of actin stress fibers and focal
contact formation in spreading NIH 3T3 fibroblasts (32).
FAK incorporation into mature focal contacts may promote c-Src
disassociation and downregulation of FAK activity through conformational changes. Thus the decline in FAK phosphorylation 15 and
45 min after an 1,800-cycle load stimulus may correlate with the
formation of mature focal contacts, activation of structural proteins,
and cytoskeletal changes. During this time course, the data also
demonstrated that unloaded specimens have a significant amount of
tyrosine-phosphorylated FAK. An assumption of this model is that there
is integrin-dependent binding of cells within the bone chamber
microenvironment to an extracellular matrix, an association that would
induce the autophosphorylation of FAK. However, autophosphorylation has
been demonstrated to have little effect on enzymatic activity in vitro
(31). Maintenance of a basal level of tyrosine
phosphorylation could serve as the threshold at which FAK remains
inactive but is "poised" to respond to the appropriate level of
mechanical stimulation.
Mechanotransduction is based on the premise that bone cells are able to
sense strain or deformation within the extracellular matrix which
surrounds them. Osteocytes, osteoblasts, and bone lining cells, all
three of which are morphologic derivatives of a common pluripotent
stromal precursor, have been proposed to possess mechanosensory
functions. Recently, several investigators (26, 34, 35)
have postulated that relatively small fluid shear stresses, created by
the movement of fluid through bone during loading, could stimulate the
surface membranes of such cells and initiate the mechanotransduction
process. Similarly, many studies have demonstrated that direct
deformation (4, 7, 22, 27) is a means by which bone cells
sense strain and which subsequently has led to diverse biological
activities. Interestingly, FAK immunoreactivity was limited to the
stromal cells and fibroblasts within the marrow space. It is possible that, because of the less connected, highly deformable nature of the
woven trabecular bone, the load stimulus engendered high strains
through the marrow cavity. Alternatively, the compressive loading
regime could have induced a significant amount of interstitial fluid
flow through this area. This fluid flow may have subsequently produced
a gradient of fluid pressure on the marrow cells. Interestingly, the
stromal fibroblasts may have been the first cells to perceive these
local mechanical signals and subsequently increased their tyrosine
kinase activity to propagate the signal transduction process.
In summary, these studies, which were conducted utilizing a model that
simulates a genuine in vivo trabecular bone microenvironment, demonstrated that tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK was induced by
specific mechanical stimuli. Load-induced activation of FAK was rapid,
and the duration of activation was dependent on an adequate number of
applied load cycles. Mechanical stimulation increased the association
of FAK with Src, and the time course of complex formation paralleled
the temporal activation of FAK. Finally, it appears that the marrow
stromal cell may play an important role in the process of
mechanotransduction in woven bone in vivo.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We acknowledge Dr. Steven Goldstein for expertise with the
mechanical aspects of the model and insightful comments during preparation of this manuscript. We also thank D. Kayner, B. Nolan, M. Stock, and K. Sweet for technical contributions to this work.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. R. Moalli, 400 North Ingalls, Rm. G161, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (E-mail: mmoalli{at}umich.edu).
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 20 July 2000; accepted in final form 9 April 2001.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Banes, AJ,
Suzaki M,
Yamamoto J,
Fischer T,
Brigman B,
Brown T,
and
Miller L.
Mechanoreception at the cellular level: the detection, interpretation, and diversity of responses to mechanical signals.
Biochem Cell Biol
73:
349-365,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
2.
Ben-Ze'ev, A,
Robinson GS,
Bucher NLR,
and
Farmer SR.
Cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions differentially regulate the expression of hepatic and cytoskeletal genes in primary cultures of rat hepatocytes.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
85:
2161-2165,
1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3.
Berk, BC,
Corson MA,
Peterson TE,
and
Tseng H.
Protein kinases as mediators of fluid shear stress stimulated signal transduction in endothelial cells: a hypothesis for calcium-dependent and calcium-independent events activated by flow.
J Biomech
28:
1439-1450,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
4.
Burger, EH,
and
Veldhuijzen JP.
Bone: A Treatise. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1993, p. 37-56.
5.
Burridge, K,
Fath K,
Kelly T,
Nuckolls G,
and
Turner C.
Focal adhesions: transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton.
Annu Rev Cell Biol
4:
487-525,
1988[Web of Science].
6.
Burridge, K,
Turner CE,
and
Romer LH.
Tyrosine phosphorylation of paxillin and pp125FAK accompanies cell adhesion to extracellular matrix: a role in cytoskeletal assembly.
J Cell Biol
119:
893-903,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7.
Carvalho, RS,
Scott JE,
and
Yen EH.
The effects of mechanical stimulation on the distribution of beta 1 integrin and expression of beta 1-integrin mRNA in TE-85 human osteosarcoma cells.
Arch Oral Biol
40:
257-264,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
8.
Chen, KD,
Li YS,
Kim M,
Li S,
Yuan S,
Chien S,
and
Shyy JYJ
Mechanotransduction in response to shear stress roles of receptor tyrosine kinases, integrins, and shc.
J Biol Chem
274:
18393-18400,
1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9.
Chien, S,
Song L,
and
Shyy JYJ
Effects of mechanical forces on signal transduction and gene expression in endothelial cells.
Hypertension
31:
162-169,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10.
Clark, EA,
and
Brugge JS.
Integrins and signal transduction pathways: the road taken.
Science
268:
233-239,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11.
Clover, J,
Dodds RA,
and
Gowen M.
Integrin subunit expression by human osteoblasts and osteoclasts in situ and in culture.
J Cell Sci
103:
267-271,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12.
Davies, PF,
and
Tripathi SC.
Mechanical stress mechanisms and the cell, an endothelial paradigm.
Circ Res
72:
239-245,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13.
Dresner-Pollak, R,
and
Rossenblatt M.
Blockade of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption through occupancy of the integrin receptor: a potential approach to the therapy of osteoporosis.
J Cell Biochem
56:
323-330,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
14.
Duncan, RL,
and
Turner CH.
Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain.
Calcif Tissue Int
57:
344-358,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
15.
Grzesik, WJ,
and
Gehron Robey P.
Bone matrix RGD glycoproteins: immunolocalisation and interaction with human primary osteoblastic bone cells in vitro.
J Bone Miner Res
9:
487-496,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
16.
Guldberg, R,
Caldwell N,
Guo E,
Goulet RW,
Hollister SJ,
and
Goldstein SA.
Mechanical stimulation of tissue repair in the hydraulic bone chamber.
J Bone Miner Res
12:
1295-1302,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
17.
Hughes, DE,
Salter DM,
Dedhar S,
and
Simpson R.
Integrin expression in human bone.
J Bone Miner Res
8:
527-533,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
18.
Hynes, RO.
Integrins: versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion.
Cell
69:
11-25,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
19.
Ingber, D.
Integrins as mechanochemical transducers.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
3:
841-848,
1991[Medline].
20.
Ingber, DE.
Cellular tensegrity: defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton.
J Cell Sci
104:
613-627,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
21.
McClay, DR,
and
Ettensohn CA.
Cell adhesion in morphogenesis.
Annu Rev Cell Biol
3:
319-345,
1987[Web of Science].
22.
Mikuni-Takagaki, Y,
Suzuki Y,
Kawase T,
and
Saito S.
Distinct responses of different populations of bone cells to mechanical stress.
Endocrinology
137:
2028-2035,
1996[Abstract].
23.
Moalli, MR,
Caldwell NJ,
Patil PV,
and
Goldstein SA.
An in vivo model for investigations of mechanical signal transduction in trabecular bone.
J Bone Miner Res
15:
1346-1353,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
24.
Mooney, D,
Hansen L,
Vacanti J,
Sanger R,
Farmer S,
and
Ingber D.
Switching from differentiation to growth in hepatocytes: control by extracellular matrix.
J Cell Physiol
151:
497-505,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
25.
Osol, G.
Mechanotransduction by vascular smooth muscle.
J Vasc Res
32:
275-292,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
26.
Owan, I,
Burr DB,
Turner CH,
Qiu J,
Tu Y,
Onyia JE,
and
Duncan RL.
Mechanotransduction in bone: osteoblasts are more responsive to fluid forces than mechanical strain.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
273:
C810-C815,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
27.
Pead, MJ,
Suswillo R,
Skerry TM,
Vedi S,
and
Lanyon LE.
Increased 3H-uridine levels in osteocytes following a single short period of dynamic bone loading in vivo.
Calcif Tissue Int
43:
92-96,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
28.
Plopper, G,
and
Ingber DE.
Rapid induction and isolation of focal adhesion complexes.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
1993:
571-578,
1993.
29.
Saito, T,
Albelda SM,
and
Brighton CT.
Identification of integrin receptors on cultured human bone cells.
J Orthop Res
12:
384-394,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
30.
Schaller, M,
and
Parsons JT.
Focal adhesion kinase and associated proteins.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
6:
705-710,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
31.
Schaller, MD,
Hildebrand JD,
Shannon JD,
Fox JW,
Vines RR,
and
Parsons JT.
Autophosphorylation of the focal adhesion kinase, pp125FAK, directs SH2-dependent binding of pp60src.
Mol Cell Biol
14:
1680-1688,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
32.
Schlaepfer, DD,
Jones KC,
and
Hunter T.
Multiple Grb2-mediated integrin-stimulated signaling pathways to ERK2/mitogen-activated protein kinase: summation of both c-Src- and focal adhesion kinase-initiated tyrosine phosphorylation events.
Mol Cell Biol
19:
2571-2585,
1998.
33.
Takahashi, M,
Ishida T,
Traub O,
Corson MA,
and
Berk BC.
Mechanotransduction in endothelial cells: temporal signaling events in response to shear stress.
J Vasc Res
34:
212-219,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
34.
Weinbaum, S,
Cowin SC,
and
Zeng Y.
A model for the excitation of osteocytes by mechanical loading-induced bone fluid shear stresses.
J Biomech
27:
339-360,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
35.
Zeng, Y,
Cowin SC,
and
Weinbaum S.
A fiber matrix model for fluid flow and streaming potentials in the canaliculi of an osteon.
Ann Biomed Eng
22:
280-292,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
36.
Zimolo, Z,
Wesolowski G,
Tanaka H,
Hyman JL,
Hoyer JR,
and
Rodan GA.
Soluble
v
3-integrin ligands raise [Ca2+]i in rat osteoclasts and mouse-derived osteoclast-like cells.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
266:
C376-C381,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
J APPL PHYSIOL 91(2):912-918
8750-7587/01 $5.00
Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society