Vol. 91, Issue 2, 847-858, August 2001
Effects of exhaustive endurance exercise on pulmonary gas
exchange and airway function in women
Thomas J.
Wetter,
Claudette M.
St. Croix,
David F.
Pegelow,
David A.
Sonetti, and
Jerome A.
Dempsey
Department of Preventive Medicine, John Rankin Laboratory of
Pulmonary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
53705
 |
ABSTRACT |
Seventeen fit women ran to exhaustion
(14 ± 4 min) at a constant speed and grade, reaching 95 ± 3% of maximal O2 consumption. Pre- and
postexercise lung function, including airway resistance [total
respiratory resistance (Rrs)] across a range of oscillation frequencies, was measured, and, on a separate day, airway reactivity was assessed via methacholine challenge. Arterial O2
saturation decreased from 97.6 ± 0.5% at rest to 95.1 ± 1.9% at 1 min and to 92.5 ± 2.6% at exhaustion.
Alveolar-arterial O2 difference (A-aDO2) widened to 27 ± 7 Torr after 1 min and was maintained at this level until exhaustion. Arterial
PO2 (PaO2) fell to 80 ± 8 Torr at 1 min and then increased to 86 ± 9 Torr at exhaustion. This increase in PaO2 over the exercise duration
occurred due to a hyperventilation-induced increase in alveolar
PO2 in the presence of a constant
A-aDO2. Arterial O2 saturation fell
with time because of increasing temperature (+2.6 ± 0.5°C) and
progressive metabolic acidosis (arterial pH: 7.39 ± 0.04 at 1 min
to 7.26 ± 0.07 at exhaustion). Plasma histamine increased
throughout exercise but was inversely correlated with the fall in
PaO2 at end exercise. Neither pre- nor postexercise
Rrs, frequency dependence of Rrs, nor diffusing capacity for CO
correlated with the exercise A-aDO2 or
PaO2. Although several subjects had a positive or
borderline hyperresponsiveness to methacholine, this reactivity did not
correlate with exercise-induced changes in Rrs or exercise-induced
arterial hypoxemia. In conclusion, regardless of the degree of
exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia at the onset of high-intensity
exercise, prolonging exercise to exhaustion had no further deleterious
effects on A-aDO2, and the degree of gas
exchange impairment was not related to individual differences in small
or large airway function or reactivity.
exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia; arterial blood gases; esophageal temperature; respiratory resistance; histamine
 |
INTRODUCTION |
EXERCISE-INDUCED
ARTERIAL hypoxemia (EIAH), defined as an inability to maintain
resting levels of arterial O2 partial pressure (PaO2) and arterial O2 saturation
(SaO2) of Hb, occurs in many trained subjects during
incremental exercise tests to maximum (13, 18, 37). This
condition is primarily due to an excessive alveolar-to-arterial
O2 difference (A-aDO2) and
inadequate compensatory hyperventilation but also to increasing
temperature and metabolic acidosis, which cause a rightward shift in
the Hb-O2 dissociation curve (14). In
susceptible individuals, during brief, high-intensity exercise,
PaO2 falls in the first minute of exercise and stays relatively constant over the ensuing 2-4 min, whereas, at the same
time, %SaO2 continues to fall as pH decreases
(13, 21, 32). Furthermore, EIAH begins to occur even in
submaximal exercise in some subjects and often worsens as work rate is
further increased (13, 18, 40). During long-term,
high-intensity exercise, these influences on pulmonary gas exchange
might be altered. For example, in moderate-intensity [65% maximum
O2 consumption (
O2 max)], prolonged exercise, ventilation-perfusion
(
A/
) inequality was shown to increase with
time, and although A-aDO2 did not widen much
beyond resting levels and did not worsen over time in this study
(20), this might not be the case in higher intensity
endurance exercise. On the other hand, EIAH may be lessened in
prolonged exercise because hyperventilation is progressive and arterial pH may remain near normal or actually shift in an alkaline direction over time (17).
Airway inflammation and narrowing, leading to abnormal ventilation
distribution, could contribute to the widened
A-aDO2 seen during incremental exercise. The
condition of asthma is characterized by some degree of airway
inflammation, and high rates of ventilation result in a drying of
airway mucosal cells and can lead to increases in bronchoconstrictor
mediator release (8). Whereas asthmatic subjects typically
respond to exercise with large and small airway constriction, perhaps
in subjects with EIAH the large airways are protected from
bronchoconstriction but smaller peripheral airways are not. Histamine
is one inflammatory mediator that has been shown to increase during
heavy exercise and that could cause bronchoconstriction at the level of
the small airways and/or increase microvascular permeability
(2). Both factors could contribute to gas exchange
abnormalities. In addition, increases in peripheral airway resistance
could constrain ventilation and contribute to the inadequate alveolar
hyperventilation seen in subjects with EIAH. The differences in
susceptibility to EIAH among fit subjects may also be related to
differences in airway smooth muscle reactivity. To date, a role for
exercise-induced changes in airway resistance has not been evident, as
decreases in the maximal flow-volume loop after maximal exercise have
not been demonstrated in subjects with EIAH (23). However,
this does not rule out a significant role for increased airway
reactivity, inflammation, and narrowing of the smaller airways in EIAH
(26).
We were interested in the effects of prolonged, constant-speed,
high-intensity exercise to exhaustion on EIAH and its components, as
this type of exercise bout is more typical of a racelike situation than
a progressive, incremental exercise test. We also wondered whether
changes in large or small airway resistance or interindividual differences in resting (preexercise) airway resistance or airway reactivity might be implicated as causes of an excessively widened A-aDO2. We, therefore, characterized the
development of EIAH and its components over the course of a ~15-min
constant-speed treadmill exercise bout to exhaustion (mean of 93%
O2 max) in fit women runners. We also
compared pre- with postexercise changes in lung function, including
total respiratory resistance (Rrs) at 5-35 Hz and general airway
reactivity to methacholine challenge, with the degree of gas exchange
impairment. We hypothesized that EIAH, especially during prolonged,
high-intensity exercise, would in part be due to enhanced airway
reactivity and exercise-induced changes in airway caliber and resistance.
We used women as our test subjects because 1) less exercise
data, including blood-gas data, have been collected in women; 2) EIAH has been observed in some active women with a much
lower absolute
O2 max than in men with
EIAH, and some of these women show significant EIAH even during
submaximal exercise, possibly due to smaller relative lung and airway
size (18, 27, 29); 3) there is some
epidemiological evidence that women have greater general airway
reactivity compared with men (35, 47).
 |
METHODS |
Subjects.
Seventeen healthy women (nonsmoking) were recruited to participate in
this study. Informed consent was obtained in writing from each subject,
and all procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of
the University of Wisconsin-Madison. All subjects were nonelite
runners; however, most competed in local road races. Fourteen
considered running their primary physical activity, two were cyclists,
and one was a triathlete. Nine of the subjects were on oral
contraceptives, and the other eight were tested during the follicular
phase of their menstrual cycle. Based on a detailed questionnaire, all
subjects were free from cardiopulmonary disease. Two subjects had used
bronchodilators (last usage was >2 mo before the study); however, at
the time of the study, none was taking medication with the exception of
one subject taking allergy medication.
Resting pulmonary function tests.
Vital capacity (VC), inspiratory capacity (IC), forced expiratory
volume in 1 s (FEV1), functional residual capacity,
and total lung capacity (TLC) were determined as previously reported (28). Lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide
(DLCO) and residual volume were determined by a
single-breath, breath-holding technique (33). Briefly,
seated subjects made a maximal inspiration from residual volume of a
gas mixture containing 20.9% O2, 0.5% Ne, 0.4% CO,
balance N2. The breath was held for 10 s and then expired. The first liter of expired gas was discarded, then ~50% of
the VC was collected, and Ne and CO concentration was analyzed by gas
chromatograph. Measurements were made in triplicate, separated by 5 min, and the average value was recorded. Closing volume was measured by
using a standard single-breath N2 washout procedure (42). Total Rrs was measured by using the forced
oscillation technique (Jaeger, MS-IOS), and both room air (all
subjects) and helium (11 subjects) were used as the inspired gas
(9). Frequency dependence of resistance (Rrs, 5-25
Hz) was calculated as the change in Rrs from 5 to 25 Hz, and resonant
frequency was the frequency at which reactance equaled zero. In 13 of
the subjects, exhaled nitric oxide (NO) concentration was measured at a
constant expiratory airflow rate, as previously described
(45). These tests were all performed both before and after exercise.
Exercise protocols.
Subjects breathed through a low-resistance, two-way valve (model 2400;
Hans Rudolph, Kansas City, MO), and expired gases were sampled at the
mouth and after a 8.64-liter mixing chamber via a Perkin-Elmer
(Norwalk, CT) mass spectrometer (model 1100). Inspiratory and
expiratory flow rates were measured separately by heated
pneumotachographs (23). Signals were displayed on a chart
recorder, sent through an analog-to-digital board, and sampled on a
computer at 75 Hz. Subjects wore a heart rate monitor (Polar Electro,
Kempele, Finland).
Initially, subjects completed an incremental
O2 max exercise test on a treadmill. At
a later date, a second treadmill test was conducted at a constant speed
and a slight grade, which combined to elicit ~90-95%
O2 max and could be sustained for ~15
min. DLCO tests were conducted on this day both
pre- and ~30 min postexercise. This treadmill test served to
familiarize the subjects with the exercise protocol to be conducted
while drawing arterial blood. The exercise protocol on the day of blood collection (third exercise test) is depicted in Fig.
1. A 20-gauge arterial catheter (Arrow)
was inserted percutaneously in the radial artery of the left arm under
local 1% lidocaine anesthesia, and a Mon-a-therm nasopharyngeal
temperature probe (Mallinckrodt Medical, St. Louis, MO) was placed
intranasally in the lower one-third of the esophageal lumen. After
preexercise lung function tests, resting arterial blood samples were
collected while subjects breathed on the mouthpiece. After a brief
warmup, subjects ran for 3 min at 50 and 75%
O2 max, and blood samples were
collected during the final 30 s of each workload. The speed and
grade of the treadmill were then increased over 30 s to the
predetermined high-intensity (~90%
O2 max) constant work rate (speed 8.0 ± 0.5 mph, grade 2.6 ± 0.8%). Subjects were instructed
and encouraged to run as long as possible. Arterial blood was collected every 2 min beginning at minute 1 and also at exhaustion
(minutes 1, 3, 5, ... , final
30 s of exercise). After an ~30-min rest, during which time
postexercise pulmonary function tests were performed, subjects again
ran for 3 min at the same constant ~90% workload, after which time
the grade was increased by 2-4% to bring the subjects to
O2 max, and they ran until exhaustion
(time at final workload = 95 ± 30 s).

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Exercise protocol used on day of
arterial blood collection. Subject preparation involved insertion of
arterial catheter, esophageal temperature probe, and preexercise lung
function tests. Pre- and postexercise lung function tests included
maximal flow-volume loops (conducted 5 ± 2 min postexercise),
constant-flow nitric oxide, airway resistance measures with air and
helium (10 ± 2 min), single-breath nitrogen washout (20 ± 6 min), and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (~30 min). Nos. in
shaded blocks denote the duration of each exercise bout (in min).
O2 max, maximum O2
consumption.
|
|
On the day of blood collection, ambient temperature was 23 ± 1°C, barometric pressure was 732 ± 5 mmHg, and a 16-in. fan
cooled subjects during the exercise bout.
Blood gas, body temperature, blood lactate, and plasma histamine
measurements.
Samples (3-5 ml) of arterial blood were drawn anerobically over
10-20 s during each trial for measurement of
PO2, PCO2, and pH with
a blood-gas analyzer calibrated with tonometered blood (ABL300,
Radiometer), and samples of O2 saturation and Hb were measured with a CO-oximeter (OSM 3, Radiometer). Calculated
SaO2 values (based on measured PaO2
and changes in body temperature and pH) were essentially identical to
measured SaO2 [r = 0.96; where
calculated SaO2 = 0.998 (CO-oximeter
%SaO2) + 0.048]. Blood gases were corrected for
body temperature changes during exercise. The alveolar O2
partial pressure (PAO2) was estimated by
using the ideal alveolar gas equation (34). Blood lactate
concentration was analyzed by means of a Yellow Springs Instruments
lactate analyzer (model 1500 Sport). Hematocrit was determined by
microcentrifuge. Blood samples for histamine were drawn into tubes with
EDTA and immediately placed on ice until centrifugation. Plasma was
harvested and stored at
70°C until analysis with an enzyme
immunoassay kit (Immunotech, Marseille, France).
Methacholine challenge test.
A methacholine challenge test (MCT) was done to test for an association
between general airway reactivity to a bronchoconstrictor agent and
exercise-induced changes in airway function or the development of EIAH
or a widened A-aDO2. This test was done on a
separate day in 16 of the subjects following American Thoracic Society guidelines (3). A DeVilbiss nebulizer (model 646) and
Rosenthal dosimeter were used to administer methacholine chloride
(Provocholine, Methapharm). A five-breath dosimeter protocol was used,
and doses of saline that were 0.0625, 0.25, 1, 4, 16, and 32 mg/ml of
methacholine were administered. Output of the nebulizer was 0.009 ml/breath with a 0.6-s activation. Subjects breathed in to TLC and held each breath for ~5 s. The time interval between doses was kept at 5 min. At baseline and between each dose, measures of Rrs were made
first, as this method has been shown to be a more sensitive test
compared with FEV1 to measure changes in bronchial tone
(36, 43) and avoids a lung volume history, which might
reverse a bronchoconstriction effect. This was followed by the
conventional FEV1 measure and then IC measurement as an
indication of the functional significance of the bronchoconstriction
(i.e., changes in end-expiratory lung volume). Exhaled NO was measured
last. If and when a >20% fall (from the saline dose) in
FEV1 occurred, the FEV1 maneuver was repeated
one to two times. If the FEV1 fell more than 20%, the
dosing protocol was stopped, a bronchodilator (albuterol) administered,
and tests repeated to ensure recovery from bronchoconstriction.
Statistical analysis.
Subjects were divided into two groups based on the
PaO2 maintained during the high-intensity prolonged
exercise bout to exhaustion (the mean PaO2 value of
minute 1 through the end value was calculated for each
individual) and labeled according to low PaO2 (
80
Torr; Lo-PO2, n = 8) and high
PaO2 (>80 Torr; Hi-PO2,
n = 9). This categorization is similar to the >10-Torr
fall in PaO2 from resting values used previously
during an incremental maximal exercise test (18) but is
less influenced by hyper- or hypoventilation at rest. Seven of eight
subjects in Lo-PO2 and none in
Hi-PO2 had a mean PaO2 decrease of >10 Torr from rest during the exercise bout.
Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA was used to compare mean values for
each group across time. If a main effect (group or time) or interaction
(group × time) was observed, Tukey's post hoc analysis was used
to determine where the differences existed. For analysis of data
conducted at different exercise intensities, intensity replaced time as the factor. Linear regression was used to establish correlations. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Data are presented
as means ± SD.
 |
RESULTS |
General data.
Subjects' physical and resting lung function characteristics
are shown in Table 1.
O2 max was ~30% above predicted values, whereas DLCO was ~9% lower
(P = 0.003) than predicted. Maximal voluntary
ventilation in 15 s was also ~30% above predicted using a
prediction equation based on age and body surface area (BSA); however,
with the use of another common predictor (FEV1 × 40),
this fell to 95 ± 15% of predicted.
Prolonged exercise data.
Individual and group mean data collected at rest and during the
high-intensity exercise bout to exhaustion are presented in Figs.
2-4.
Blood-gas data revealed a rapid fall in PaO2, a
widening of A-aDO2, and a progressive decline
in arterial PCO2 (PaCO2) on
initiation of exercise. Throughout the duration of exercise, PaO2 increased slightly as
PAO2 rose (107 ± 3 Torr at
minute 1 to 112 ± 3 Torr at exhaustion), and
PaCO2 fell and A-aDO2 remained relatively unchanged over the duration of the exercise. Overall mean
SaO2 declined by 2.5 ± 1.9% at minute
1 and fell further throughout exercise to a nadir of 92.5 ± 2.6% at exhaustion (range 86.2-95.6%). In subjects with lower
mean PaO2 values (Lo-PO2), differences in SaO2, PaO2, and
A-aDO2 from Hi-PO2 were
apparent early in the exercise bout (by 1-3 min), but the patterns
of change over time were similar, although subjects in
Lo-PO2 had a reduced rise in
PaO2 from minute 1 to exhaustion. Although
mean PaCO2 did not differ between groups, the decrease
over time was greater in Hi-PO2 as was the
increase in minute ventilation/O2 consumption (
O2).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Individual and mean arterial blood-gas data at rest and during the
~90% O2 max exercise bout to
exhaustion. A: arterial O2 saturation
(SaO2); B: arterial
PO2 (PaO2); C:
alveolar-arterial O2 difference
(A-aDO2); and D: arterial
PCO2 (PaCO2). See text for
explanation of groups. , Data for
Lo-PO2 group (n = 8);
, data for Hi-PO2 group
(n = 9); both are connected by thick solid lines. For
individual data, thin solid lines represent subjects in
Lo-PO2 and dotted lines represent subjects in
Hi-PO2. Values are means ± SD.
* Significant difference between groups (P < 0.05).
G, significant main effect of group; G × T, group × time
significant interaction. Time effect was significant (P < 0.001) for all variables except A-aDO2
(P = 0.015).
|
|
A-aDO2 explained 93% of the variance in
PaO2 (P < 0.001), whereas the
correlation with PaCO2 was also significant
(P = 0.017) but explained less (33%) of the
variance (Fig. 5, A and
B). The major differences in arterial oxygenation
and gas exchange that occurred among subjects at the point of
exhaustion were already present near the onset of high-intensity
endurance exercise. A-aDO2 and
PaO2 were not significantly correlated to
O2 max (r = 0.02, P = 0.93) in this group of runners with a narrow range of
O2 max values (44-56
ml · kg
1 · min
1).
Metabolic and heart rate data were similar between
Lo-PO2 and Hi-PO2, both
in terms of absolute values and changes over exercise time (Figs. 3 and
4).
O2 increased throughout the first 7 min of exercise, peaked at 95 ± 3% of
O2 max, and then remained stable until
exhaustion (range 87-99% of
O2 max).
O2 did not differ between groups.
CO2 production also increased from 2.46 ± 0.35 l/min
at minute 1 to 2.93 ± 0.42 l/min at exhaustion. Heart
rate increased from 60 ± 12 beats/min at rest to 171 ± 15 beats/min at minute 1 and 189 ± 12 beats/min at
exhaustion. The increase in minute ventilation over time was due
predominantly to increased breathing frequency as tidal volume reached
a maximum of 51 ± 8% of VC (range 33-71%) during
minute 7 before decreasing slightly over the remaining time
to exhaustion.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
O2 consumption
( O2; A), minute ventilation
( E; B), and breathing frequency (bf;
C) at rest and during the ~90%
O2 max exercise bout to exhaustion.
Lines and symbols are as defined in Fig. 2 legend. Values are
means ± SD. * Significant difference between groups
(P < 0.05). Time effect was significant
(P < 0.001) for all variables.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Arterial pH (pHa; A), arterial
lactate (lactatea; B), and esophageal body
temperature (tempes; C) at rest and during the
~90% O2 max exercise bout to
exhaustion. Lines and symbols are as defined in Fig. 2 legend. Values
are means ± SD. Time effect was significant (P < 0.001) for all variables.
|
|
Over the time of the exercise bout, pH fell progressively due to a
steady but highly variable 2-8 mmol/l rise in blood lactate, which
was partially compensated by the steady fall in PaCO2.
Esophageal temperature was 36.9 ± 0.3°C at rest, increased to
37.3 ± 0.4°C after the warm-up period, and then increased to
37.7 ± 0.4°C at minute 1 and 39.5 ± 0.4°C at
exhaustion (range 39.0-40.3°C). The pattern of temperature
increase with exercise duration was similar among subjects; however,
the range of absolute values was
1.3°C at all exercise time points.
The amount of hemoconcentration from rest to exhaustion was 1.4 ± 0.2 g/dl with the majority (1.0 ± 0.2 g/dl) occurring by minute 1 (no difference between
Hi-PO2 and Lo-PO2). As
a result of this and the decrease in %SaO2, arterial
O2 content increased from 17.4 ± 1.5 and 18.0 ± 1.6 g/dl at rest to 18.0 ± 1.2 and 19.2 ± 1.5 g/dl at
exhaustion in Lo-PO2 and
Hi-PO2, respectively.
Plasma histamine was significantly increased from rest to minute
3 and further increased at end exercise (137 ± 96% above resting values). Values ranged between 2 and 8 nmol/l at exhaustion, and all returned toward resting levels during recovery (Fig.
6). The mean PaO2
maintained during exercise was positively correlated to end-exercise
histamine level (Fig. 5C), and this relationship was of
borderline significance (P = 0.051) when the changes in PaO2 and histamine from rest to end exercise were
correlated (Fig. 5D).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Correlation between PaO2 during the ~90%
O2 max exercise bout to exhaustion
and A-aDO2 (A),
PaCO2 (B), and plasma histamine
concentration at exhaustion (C). PaO2,
A-aDO2, and PaCO2 values are
mean data (mean for minute 1 to exhaustion) for each
individual. Histamine values are from the sample that was collected at
exhaustion. D: correlation between the fall in
PaO2 from rest to end exercise and the increase in
plasma histamine from rest to end exercise. Solid lines represent lines
of best fit.
|
|
Causes of O2 desaturation during exercise.
For the Lo-PO2 group, we partitioned the amount
of the total fall in SaO2 from rest at 3 min (4.7 ± 1.8%) and at exhaustion (6.7 ± 2.7%) due to the effects of
PaO2, pH, and temperature. For the initial (rest to
minute 3) fall in SaO2, the 21 ± 8 Torr drop in PaO2 was the most significant factor,
accounting for 65 ± 7% of the decrease in SaO2.
From 3 min to end exercise, the contributions due to increasing
temperature and decreasing pH accounted for the entire remaining
decrease in SaO2 that occurred over time. At the end
point of prolonged exercise, 54 ± 11% of the Hb-O2
desaturation from resting values was caused by the combination of
metabolic acidosis (decrease of 0.14 ± 0.08 pH units) and a 2.5 ± 0.5°C rise in temperature, and the remainder (46 ± 11%) was due to a 17 ± 9 Torr decrease in PaO2.
Effects of exercise intensity on EIAH.
Figure 7 shows mean
SaO2, PaO2,
A-aDO2, PaCO2, pH, and
esophageal temperature at 3 min of exercise at 50, 75, and 90%
O2 max and during a shorter bout
(95 ± 30 s) of exercise at 100% of
O2 max in
Lo-PO2 and Hi-PO2
groups (categorized based on PaO2 during 90%
prolonged exercise bout). The most notable findings were that, by 75%
of
O2 max, PaO2 was
already significantly lower and A-aDO2 wider in
those subjects who showed the most EIAH during prolonged exercise
(i.e., Lo-PO2 group).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Plasma histamine concentration in arterial blood at rest,
during the ~90% O2 max exercise
bout to exhaustion, and during recovery. Recovery sample was collected
3.5 ± 0.7 min after the end of exercise. Lines and symbols are as
defined in Fig. 2 legend. Values are means ± SD. Time effect was
significant (P < 0.001).
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of exercise intensity on arterial saturation and
its components. Values are means ± SD.
Lo-PO2 ( ) and
Hi-PO2 ( ) values are shown
after 3 min of work at 50 and 75% of
O2 max (before the prolonged 90%
O2 max exercise bout), at the 3-min
time point during the 90% O2 max to
exhaustion trial, and at O2 max
during the repeat exercise trial. The time at
O2 max was 95 ± 30 s. The
groups were categorized according to PaO2
data during the ~90% O2 max
prolonged exercise bout. * P < 0.05, compared with
other group at same work rate. The effect of intensity was significant
for all variables (P < 0.001).
|
|
Changes in lung function after exercise and correlation to EIAH.
Pre- and postexercise lung function tests are shown in Table
2. Preexercise Rrs varied considerably
among subjects (2-9
cmH2O · l
1 · s), and
individual changes in Rrs after exercise were highly variable. Rrs at
all frequencies fell in four subjects and was unchanged (changes of
1
cmH2O · l
1 · s) in the
others. The higher the preexercise Rrs, the greater the fall in Rrs
after exercise (r =
0.699, P = 0.002), but this was primarily due to large decreases in two subjects
with high preexercise Rrs values. Neither pre- nor postexercise Rrs was correlated with the exercise A-aDO2,
PaO2, or PaCO2; however, there was a
trend for an increase in Rrs after exercise to be related to a wide
A-aDO2 (r = 0.42;
P = 0.096) and low PaO2
(r =
0.41; P = 0.105). It was not
related to differences in PaCO2. The frequency
dependence of Rrs was also not affected by exercise and did not
correlate with exercise blood-gas variables. Substituting helium for
room air caused Rrs to fall by ~1
cmH2O · l
1 · s (at 5 Hz), and
frequency dependence of Rrs tended to be greater (0.96 helium vs. 0.75 air), but this helium effect was not significant and also did not
differ pre- to postexercise. None of the lung volumes, maximal flow
rates, or DLCO changed significantly pre- to
postexercise (see Table 2).
Baseline FEV1 (%predicted) was correlated to nadir
exercise SaO2 (r = 0.567;
P = 0.018) and to PaO2
(r = 0.589; P = 0.013). The slope of
the N2 washout was inversely correlated to exercise SaO2 (r =
0.736; P = 0.002) and positively with A-aDO2
(r = 0.550; P = 0.034). VC
(%predicted) was negatively associated with the A-aDO2 (r =
0.485;
P = 0.048), and forced VC (%predicted) with PaO2 (r = 0.511; P = 0.036). No other resting lung function measures correlated with the
degree of hypoxemia.
Airway reactivity to methacholine.
Individual values for FEV1, Rrs, and IC during the MCT are
presented in Fig. 8. With the use of the
clinical definition of the concentration of methacholine causing a 20%
fall in FEV1 (PC20), 2 of 16 subjects would be
classified as having a positive MCT (PC20 < 4 mg/ml),
and three additional subjects would be considered to have borderline
bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PC20 = 4-16 mg/ml). The rest had normal bronchial responsiveness
(PC20 > 16 mg/ml). We also calculated 95% confidence
intervals for both Rrs and FEV1 values in each subject
based on repeated baseline measurements conducted on the various test
days (n = 4-12 values). We then determined the
dose of methacholine that caused a significant change in Rrs or
FEV1 (i.e., one that exceeded the 95% confidence interval). Seven subjects had a measurable change in Rrs before (at a
lower dose) FEV1 changed; in four, Rrs and FEV1
changed at the same dose; and in five, FEV1 changed at a
lower dose. Rrs of 5-25 Hz changed in response to the MCT in a
similar manner across subjects as did Rrs at 5 Hz.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effects of methacholine challenge testing on forced
expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1; A), total
respiratory resistance (Rrs) at 5 Hz (B), and inspiratory
capacity (IC; C) for each subject. The methacholine
challenge test was ended if FEV1 fell by 20% or a dose
of 32 mg/ml was reached. Each individual is represented by a different
symbol. Subjects in Lo-PO2 group are identified
by connecting solid lines and those in Hi-PO2
by dotted lines.
|
|
A fall in IC was related to the increase in Rrs. IC decreased from
2.41 ± 0.51 liters at baseline to 2.12 ± 0.46 liters after the final methacholine dose; it also decreased to a greater extent in
those subjects who had a positive or borderline response to the
methacholine (decrease of 23 ± 11% from baseline to final dose
compared with a decrease of 8 ± 7% in the subjects with a normal
response). Constant-flow expiratory NO concentration did not change in
response to any dose of methacholine.
Response to methacholine did not predict EIAH. There was no
relationship between the percent decline in FEV1 or
increase in Rrs at 5 Hz during the MCT and exercise
PaO2 or A-aDO2 (r
0.1, P > 0.6). In addition, exercise-induced
changes in Rrs and FEV1 were not related to bronchial
hyperresponsiveness to methacholine in our group of subjects. Five
subjects had a >1
cmH2O · l
1 · s increase in
Rrs at a methacholine dose of 4 mg/ml; in these same subjects, the
change in Rrs pre- to postexercise was a fall of between 0.3 and 2.0 cmH2O · l
1 · s.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The purpose of this study was to determine the time course of
SaO2 and gas exchange during prolonged, constant work
rate, high-intensity running exercise to exhaustion and to evaluate baseline and changes in pre- to postexercise lung function, including airway resistance, in relation to EIAH. At the first minute of exercise, PaO2 fell 14 Torr from rest and
A-aDO2 widened to 27 Torr; at the same time,
PaCO2 was nearly unchanged from rest. After the
initial fall, PaO2 rose slightly as
PAO2 increased with the onset of
hyperventilation, and there was no further worsening of pulmonary gas
exchange (as evidenced by a constant A-aDO2) over the exercise time. SaO2 continued to fall
throughout the exercise bout, indicating the importance of a
time-related decrease in pH and increasing temperature at any given
PaO2. Changes in large or small airway function with
exercise and airway responsiveness to methacholine were not related to
the development or degree of EIAH or gas exchange impairment. This lack
of correlation existed despite the fact that several subjects had high
baseline airway resistance and/or bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine.
Comparison with previous "prolonged" constant-workload studies.
Many studies have examined EIAH by using an incremental exercise
protocol or very short-term heavy exercise; however, there have been
relatively few studies that have examined the time course of EIAH or
gas exchange during a constant-workload exercise bout lasting >5 min,
and none of these has been conducted with female subjects. The studies
that have been done were conducted at lower intensities and over a
longer exercise time than the present study (17, 20, 46,
48). In each of these studies, arterial desaturation was
generally absent as PaO2 did not fall >5 Torr on
initiation of exercise and typically rose slightly across the exercise
time, whereas A-aDO2 ranged between 10 and 25 Torr, and in only one of the studies (48) did it worsen
over time. Interestingly, most of the subjects in the Dempsey et al.
study (13) who showed no EIAH during long-term,
moderate-intensity exercise did desaturate significantly during
short-term maximal exercise. In the present study, high-intensity,
prolonged exercise elicited significant gas exchange impairment and
EIAH in approximately one-half of the subjects.
Relative contributions of PaO2, pH, and
temperature to the fall in SaO2.
The fall in PaO2 that occurred in the rest-to-exercise
transition accounted for the majority of the decreased
SaO2 early in the exercise bout. However, in most
subjects, PaO2 then rose slightly over the course of
exercise, and the further fall in SaO2 was completely
due to decreasing pH and increasing temperature and the resultant
rightward shift of the Hb-O2 dissociation curve.
Individual variations in temperature, pH, and PaO2 can
greatly affect SaO2. Esophageal temperature increased
to
39°C in all subjects and in two reached
40.0°C at
exhaustion. This temperature increase is higher than what is typically
seen during an incremental exercise test (38.2°C in Ref.
18) and is likely the result of a greater amount of time
spent near maximal effort. Changes in the pH of arterial blood were
more varied, falling only slightly in some and to <7.20 in several
others. What is the effect of differences in pH and temperature in
subjects with similar PaO2 and
A-aDO2 values on SaO2? Two
subjects maintained an A-aDO2 of ~28 Torr and
a PaO2 of ~80 Torr, but their pH fell to
7.20 and body temperature rose to 40°C. In these subjects,
SaO2 decreased to
90% at exhaustion. In contrast,
two other subjects with a wider A-aDO2 (~34
Torr) and a lower PaO2 (~77 Torr), but whose pH
remained >7.33 and temperature rose to only 39.5°C, had an SaO2 at end exercise of 93-94%. Thus, whereas
PaO2 remains the primary determinant of
SaO2, the influence of individual differences in
changes in pH and body temperature during exercise and the importance
of changes in these variables over exercise time should not be
overlooked. The effects of pH on desaturation in rowers during
high-intensity exercise have been stressed previously
(32).
Correlation of EIAH with resting lung function.
Our resting spirometry values were within normal ranges.
DLCO was slightly below predicted values based
on equations by Knudson et al. (24) and also by Crapo and
Morris (11). The absolute values for
DLCO and for
DLCO/
A of our female
subjects were nearly identical to those found in similar groups of fit
female subjects (18, 19).
Hopkins et al. (20) found that the development of
A/
inequality during exercise (as measured by
the log SD of
distribution during the multiple inert-gas
elimination technique) was significantly correlated with the ratio of
TLC to BSA (TLC/BSA) and hypothesized that perhaps people with a
smaller relative lung size would have smaller airways and blood vessels
and that this could accentuate any regional inhomogeneities in the
distribution of air and blood flow (20). We found no
relationship between A-aDO2 and TLC/BSA (r = 0.166; P = 0.525), nor was a
relationship found in the study by Harms et al. (18),
which included 29 female subjects with a wide range of EIAH at
O2 max. Despite this, in the present
study, several other measures of lung size or function (VC, FVC, and
FEV1) were weakly (r < 0.6; see
RESULTS), but significantly, correlated with the
A-aDO2 or PaO2 during
exercise. Therefore, it is unclear what, if any, role lung size has in
explaining EIAH in healthy subjects. We emphasize that a lack of
correlation between lung size and EIAH does not contradict the positive
correlation reported of lung size to exercise
A/
uniformity, because overall mean
A/
rises substantially during exercise,
thereby negating much of the effect of
A/
nonuniformity on arterial oxygenation.
Airways and EIAH.
Our rationale for studying the role of small airway reactivity and
small airway resistance in EIAH was threefold. First, we reasoned that
A/
maldistribution was a potential
contributor to the widened A-aDO2 in persons
with EIAH because, in both fit men (13, 41) and especially
in female subjects (18), an excessive
A-aDO2 was already obvious, even in
mild-to-moderate-intensity exercise. These changes are unlikely to be
attributable to diffusion limitation at these lower metabolic
requirements; however, we wish to emphasize that diffusion limitation
is a very likely contributor to EIAH and excessive
A-aDO2 during high-intensity and maximal exercise intensities (41). Second, a recent study using
pharmacological blockade also pointed to airway inflammation as a
potential cause of the widened A-aDO2 in EIAH,
at least in older, fit subjects (38). Thus airway
resistance changes may be involved. However, in normal subjects, tests
of large airway resistance, namely the expiratory flow-volume loop or
FEV1, show no effect of maximum exercise; in fact
bronchodilation is most often observed both during and after exercise
(8), even in the presence of severe EIAH
(23). Therefore, we reasoned that small or peripheral
airway diameters might be compromised with heavy exercise, thereby
creating a maldistribution of mechanical time constants and of inspired ventilation (26). Finally, we also suspected that even
relatively small increases in airway resistance may be especially
important in women who, in general, have smaller airway diameters and
lung volumes relative to men of similar age and stature (4,
29). This hypothesis was tested by using the forced oscillation
technique to measure Rrs under physiological conditions with tidal
breathing. The frequency dependence of Rrs (5-25 Hz) has been
shown to be sensitive to selective increases in small airway resistance
and to correlate highly with frequency dependence of compliance,
especially when He-O2 is used as an inspirate
(9). Change in the phase III of the single-breath
N2 test was also used to document any exercise-induced
changes in the distribution of inspired gas (10). On the
other hand, there are several limitations to these methods. These tests
were conducted postexercise, and, therefore, any changes apparent
during exercise may have resolved in the recovering, resting subjects.
Our findings did reveal several subjects with abnormally elevated
baseline Rrs and/or frequency dependence of Rrs, steep slopes of the
phase III single-breath N2 test, and abnormal airway
reactivity. Nonetheless, the findings were also consistent in
demonstrating that exhaustive, prolonged exercise per se had no
measurable deleterious effect on large or small airway function in any
subject, nor was the absolute level of airway resistance or airway
reactivity a significant determinant of the exercise-induced widening
of the A-aDO2 or of EIAH.
We consider these mostly negative data concerning the relationships of
airway resistance to EIAH as follows. For the high baseline Rrs
subjects, it is feasible that these airway resistances were simply not
sufficiently elevated to cause enough maldistribution of
mechanical time constants to effect distribution of ventilation. Alternatively, moderate-to-heavy-intensity exercise with augmented tidal volumes will promote bronchodilation because of the tethering effects of the increased traction created by parenchymal attachments to
the airway (44). Indeed, this lung-to-airway mechanical
interaction at high tidal volume has also recently been shown to reduce
the force generation by activated airway smooth muscle
(16), and exercise-induced bronchodilation also occurs
conversely secondary to a changing neurochemical control of bronchiolar
smooth muscle (8). Furthermore, increases in inspiratory
flow rate have been shown to elicit a more uniform topographical
distribution of ventilation (5), and this influence may
have been sufficient during heavy exercise, when peak flow rates
increase 10 times or more and tidal volume is four to five times higher
than at rest, to overcome these interindividual differences in Rrs.
Certainly, the lack of exercise-induced increases in frequency
dependence of Rrs may also reflect our inability with an indirect
measurement to detect differences in the "silent zone" of the lung
periphery until a very large number of these peripheral airways are
compromised (9, 26).
MCT.
Five of sixteen subjects had a positive MCT or were classified with
borderline hyperresponsiveness. These responses to methacholine, whether measured in terms of Rrs or FEV1, did not correlate
with changes in Rrs or FEV1 that occurred pre- to
postexercise. In addition, the bronchoconstriction associated with the
MCT did not correlate with the amount of hypoxemia present during
exercise. As none of our subjects had any significant amount of
bronchoconstriction (measured either with Rrs or FEV1)
after exercise, this lack of correlation is not surprising. The finding
that subjects with hyperreactive airways did not respond to exercise in
a similar manner as they did to methacholine has also been reported by
others (1) and may reflect the fact that even exhaustive
exercise (at least in the nonasthmatic subject) does not involve
sufficient bronchoprovocation via release of inflammatory mediators to
cause measurable changes in central or peripheral airway diameter.
Histamine and EIAH.
Histamine is an inflammatory mediator that can induce airway
bronchoconstriction via effects on smooth muscle but also is known to
increase vascular permeability (7). Plasma histamine has
also been found to be significantly higher in athletes compared with
sedentary controls at the end of a maximal exercise bout (2). Furthermore, a significant correlation between
histamine release (%H = plasma histamine as a percentage of whole
blood histamine) and the degree of hypoxemia implicates a possible role for this inflammatory mediator in the exercise-induced fall in PaO2 (2, 31). Because histamine in the
circulation likely reflects basophil release to a much greater extent
than lung mast cell release, is complicated by a very short half-life,
and is possibly released during centrifugation, it is unclear whether histamine is causal or only indirectly related to EIAH (7, 22,
30, 39).
In our subjects, mean plasma histamine concentration increased with
time over the course of the constant work rate exercise bout, and the
absolute concentration and change from rest was similar
(2) or slightly higher (31) at exhaustion to
values found in athletes at the end of an incremental maximal exercise test. In contrast to previous studies, subjects in the present study
with the greatest amount of hypoxemia tended to have a lower, not
higher, plasma histamine concentration (see Fig. 5, C and D). A confounding factor may be differences in subject
selection; all subjects in the present study were athletes of
comparable fitness levels, whereas Anselme et al. (2)
compared highly trained athletes with sedentary subjects. Thus the
corresponding work rates (and potentially other factors such as time of
exercise, body temperature, pH, etc.) at maximal exercise were
different between those two groups. Both previous studies did find
significant correlations with the change in %H from rest to maximal
exercise and the drop in PaO2 in their highly trained
athletes. The meaning of %H is unclear as changes in %H from rest to
maximal exercise are primarily due to changes in plasma histamine
because whole blood histamine remains relatively unchanged
(31) or increases during exercise (2).
Furthermore, %H remained unchanged across exercise intensities of
50-100% of
O2 max
(31). Given this, it is unclear why %H correlates with
EIAH. Perhaps %H is simply a marker for "leaky basophils," which
in turn is correlated with an increased permeability of the pulmonary
vasculature. The association between a reduction in %H and a reduction
in the widening of the A-aDO2 and fall in
PaO2 during exercise with the administration of
nedocromil sodium provides indirect evidence for at least a partial
causative role for histamine in EIAH (38); however, other
possibilities exist. Because nedocromil sodium acts as a general mast
cell stabilizer, it does not only block histamine release. Reduction of
other potential inflammatory mediators (e.g., leukotrienes or
prostaglandins) could have been responsible for the improvement in EIAH.
Finally, the findings of the present study show a rapid widening of the
A-aDO2 immediately on onset of high-intensity
exercise, with no further widening over the remaining exercise time to
exhaustion. These data cast doubt on an inflammatory mechanism for EIAH
simply because of the speed and stability of the occurrence of EIAH. Certainly, the role of histamine or other inflammatory mediators in
EIAH remains in question, at least those mediators whose release would
be influenced by increased flow and shear rates in both the airways and
the pulmonary vasculature.
In summary, we demonstrated that continuing, high-intensity exercise,
beyond the initial few minutes, has little further effect on gas
exchange and that a continued fall in SaO2 is due to
the combined effects of decreasing pH and increasing body temperature. We also confirmed that subjects with the greatest degree of EIAH during
high-intensity exercise begin to show significant gas exchange abnormalities even during moderate-intensity exercise. We found that
several of these fit subjects had high baseline airway resistance and
hyperreactive airway responses to bronchoprovocation; however, airway
resistance or its frequency dependence was not increased by prolonged,
high-intensity exercise, nor was EIAH correlated with airway resistance
or its reactivity. The reason why gas exchange impairment during
exercise occurs in some subjects remains unanswered; whatever the
cause, it becomes apparent early during high-intensity exercise and
does not worsen over time.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank our subjects for enthusiastic participation in this study.
Special thanks to Matt O'Brien for technical assistance with
methacholine dosing, Dr. Keith Meyer for medical assistance, and Zhuzai
Xiang for analysis of histamine samples.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Support for this project was provided by National Heart, Lung, and
Blood Institute (NHLBI) Grant RO1 HL-15469 and jointly by the US
Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense. T. J. Wetter was
supported by a NHLBI training grant.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence:
T. J. Wetter, PO Box 53056, Medford, MA 02153 (E-mail:
tjwetter{at}yahoo.com).
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 18 December 2000; accepted in final form 10 April 2001.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Anderson, SD,
and
Holzer K.
Exercise-induced asthma: is it the right diagnosis in elite athletes?
J Allergy Clin Immunol
106:
419-428,
2000[ISI][Medline].
2.
Anselme, F,
Caillaud C,
Couret I,
Rossi M,
and
Prefaut C.
Histamine and exercise-induced hypoxemia in highly trained athletes.
J Appl Physiol
76:
127-132,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3.
ATS.
Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
161:
309-329,
2000[Free Full Text].
4.
ATS.
Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies.
Am Rev Respir Dis
144:
1202-1218,
1991[ISI][Medline].
5.
Bake, B,
Wood L,
Murphy B,
Macklem PT,
and
Milic-Emili J.
Effect of inspiratory flow rate on regional distribution of inspired gas.
J Appl Physiol
37:
8-17,
1974[Free Full Text].
6.
Baldwin, E,
Cournand A,
Dickinson W,
and
Richards J.
Pulmonary insufficiency. I. Physiological classification, clinical methods of analysis, standard values in normal subjects.
Medicine
27:
243-278,
1948.
7.
Barnes, PJ.
The effect of histamine on airway function.
In: The Lung: Scientific Foundations (2nd ed.), edited by Crystal RG,
West JB,
et al. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1997, p. 1297-1306.
8.
Beck, KC.
Control of airway function during and after exercise in asthmatics.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
31:
S4-S11,
1999[ISI][Medline].
9.
Bhansali, PV,
Irvin CG,
Dempsey JA,
Bush R,
and
Webster JG.
Human pulmonary resistance: effect of frequency and gas physical properties.
J Appl Physiol
47:
161-168,
1979[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10.
Comroe, JH.
Physiology of Respiration. Chicago, IL: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1974.
11.
Crapo, RO,
and
Morris AH.
Standardized single breath normal values for carbon monoxide diffusing capacity.
Am Rev Respir Dis
123:
185-189,
1981[ISI][Medline].
12.
Crapo, RO,
Morris AH,
Clayton PD,
and
Nixon CR.
Lung volumes in healthy nonsmoking adults.
Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir
18:
419-425,
1982[ISI][Medline].
13.
Dempsey, JA,
Hanson PG,
and
Henderson KS.
Exercise-induced arterial hypoxaemia in healthy human subjects at sea level.
J Physiol (Lond)
355:
161-175,
1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14.
Dempsey, JA,
and
Wagner PD.
Exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia.
J Appl Physiol
87:
1997-2006,
1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15.
Drinkwater, BL,
Horvath SM,
and
Wells CL.
Aerobic power of females, ages 10-68.
J Gerontol
30:
385-394,
1975[ISI][Medline].
16.
Fredberg, JJ,
Inouye D,
Miller B,
Nathan M,
Jafari S,
Raboudi SH,
Butler JP,
and
Shore SA.
Airway smooth muscle, tidal stretches, and dynamically determined contractile states.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
156:
1752-1759,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17.
Hanson, P,
Claremont A,
Dempsey JA,
and
Reddan W.
Determinants and consequences of ventilatory responses to competitive endurance running.
J Appl Physiol
52:
615-623,
1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18.
Harms, CA,
McClaran SR,
Nickele GA,
Pegelow DF,
Nelson WB,
and
Dempsey JA.
Exercise-induced arterial hypoxaemia in healthy young women.
J Physiol (Lond)
507:
619-628,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19.
Hopkins, SR,
Barker RC,
Brutsaert TD,
Gavin TP,
Entin P,
Olfert IM,
Veisel S,
and
Wagner PD.
Pulmonary gas exchange during exercise in women: effects of exercise type and work increment.
J Appl Physiol
89:
721-730,
2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20.
Hopkins, SR,
Gavin TP,
Siafakas NM,
Haseler LJ,
Olfert IM,
Wagner H,
and
Wagner PD.
Effect of prolonged, heavy exercise on pulmonary gas exchange in athletes.
J Appl Physiol
85:
1523-1532,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21.
Hopkins, SR,
and
McKenzie DC.
Hypoxic ventilatory response and arterial desaturation during heavy work.
J Appl Physiol
67:
1119-1124,
1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22.
Ind, PW,
Brown MJ,
Lhoste FJM,
MacQuin I,
and
Dollery CT.
Concentration effect relationships of infused histamine in normal volunteers.
Agents Actions
12:
12-15,
1982[ISI][Medline].
23.
Johnson, BD,
Saupe KW,
and
Dempsey JA.
Mechanical constraints on exercise hyperpnea in endurance athletes.
J Appl Physiol
73:
874-886,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24.
Knudson, RJ,
Kaltenborn WT,
Knudson DE,
and
Burrows B.
The single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity.
Am Rev Respir Dis
135:
805-811,
1987[ISI][Medline].
25.
Knudson, RJ,
Lebowitz MD,
Holberg CJ,
and
Burrows B.
Changes in the normal maximal expiratory flow-volume curve with growth and aging.
Am Rev Respir Dis
127:
725-734,
1983[ISI][Medline].
26.
Macklem, PT.
The physiology of small airways.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
157:
S181-S183,
1998.
27.
McClaran, SR,
Harms CA,
Pegelow DF,
and
Dempsey JA.
Smaller lungs in women affect exercise hyperpnea.
J Appl Physiol
84:
1872-1881,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
28.
McClaran, SR,
Wetter TJ,
Pegelow DF,
and
Dempsey JA.
Role of expiratory flow limitation in determining lung volumes and ventilation during exercise.
J Appl Physiol
86:
1357-1366,
1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29.
Mead, J.
Dysanapsis in normal lungs assessed by the relationship between maximal flow, static recoil, and vital capacity.
Am Rev Respir Dis
121:
339-342,
1980[ISI][Medline].
30.
Morgan, DJR,
Moodley I,
Phillips MJ,
and
Davies RJ.
Plasma histamine in asthmatic and control subjects following exercise: influences of circulating basophils and different assay techniques.
Thorax
38:
771-777,
1983[Abstract].
31.
Mucci, P,
Durand F,
Lebel B,
Bousquet J,
and
Prefaut C.
Interleukins 1-beta, -8, and histamine increases in highly trained, exercising athletes.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
32:
1094-1100,
2000[Medline].
32.
Nielsen, HB,
Madsen P,
Svendsen LB,
Roach RC,
and
Secher NH.
The influence of PaO2, pH and SaO2 on maximal oxygen uptake.
Acta Physiol Scand
164:
89-97,
1998[ISI][Medline].
33.
Ogilvie, CM,
Forster RE,
Blakemore WS,
and
Morton JW.
A standardized breath holding technique for the clinical measurement of the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide.
J Clin Invest
36:
1-17,
1957.
34.
Otis, AB.
Quantitative relationships in steady-state gas exchange.
In: Handbook of Physiology. Respiration. Washington, DC: Am. Physiol. Soc, 1964, sect. 3, vol. I, chapt. 27, p. 681-698.
35.
Peat, JK,
Salome CM,
Berry G,
and
Woolcock AJ.
Relation of dose-response slope to respiratory symptoms and lung function in a population study of adults living in Busselton, West Australia.
Am Rev Respir Dis
146:
860-865,
1992[ISI][Medline].
36.
Pennings, HJ,
and
Wouters EFM
Effect of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate on isocapnic hyperventilation with cold air in asthmatics, measured with forced oscillation technique.
Eur Respir J
10:
665-671,
1997[Abstract].
37.
Powers, SK,
Martin D,
Cicale M,
Collop N,
Huang D,
and
Criswell D.
Exercise-induced hypoxemia in athletes: role of inadequate hyperventilation.
Eur J Appl Physiol
65:
37-42,
1992.
38.
Prefaut, C,
Anselme-Poujol F,
and
Caillaud C.
Inhibition of histamine release by nedocromil sodium reduces exercise-induced hypoxemia in master athletes.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
29:
10-16,
1997[ISI][Medline].
39.
Prefaut, C,
Durand F,
Mucci P,
and
Caillaud C.
Exercise-induced arterial hypoxaemia in athletes.
Sports Med
30:
47-61,
2000[ISI][Medline].
40.
Rice, AJ,
Scroop GC,
Gore CJ,
Thornton AT,
Chapman MJ,
Greville HW,
Holmes MD,
and
Scicchitano R.
Exercise-induced hypoxaemia in highly trained cyclists at 40% peak oxygen uptake.
Eur J Appl Physiol
79:
353-359,
1999.
41.
Rice, AJ,
Thorton AT,
Gore CJ,
Scroop GC,
Greville HW,
Wagner H,
Wagner PD,
and
Hopkins SR.
Pulmonary gas exchange during exercise in highly trained cyclists with arterial hypoxemia.
J Appl Physiol
87:
1802-1812,
1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].
42.
Ruppel, G.
Manual of Pulmonary Function Testing. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1986.
43.
Schmekel, B,
and
Smith H-J.
The diagnostic capacity of forced oscillation and forced expiration techniques in identifying asthma by isocapnic hyperpnoea of cold air.
Eur Respir J
10:
2243-2249,
1997[Abstract].
44.
Skloot, G,
Permutt S,
and
Togias A.
Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: a problem of limited smooth muscle relaxation with inspiration.
J Clin Invest
96:
2393-2403,
1995.
45.
St. Croix, CM,
Wetter TJ,
Pegelow DF,
Meyer KC,
and
Dempsey JA.
Assessment of nitric oxide formation during exercise.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
159:
1125-1133,
1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].
46.
Thomson, JM,
Dempsey JA,
Chosy LW,
Shahidi NT,
and
Reddan WG.
Oxygen transport and oxyhemoglobin dissociation during prolonged muscular work.
J Appl Physiol
37:
658-664,
1974[Free Full Text].
47.
Trigg, CJ,
Bennett JB,
Tooley M,
Sibbald B,
D'Souza MF,
and
Davies RJ.
A general practice based survey of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and its relation to symptoms, sex, age, atopy and smoking.
Thorax
45:
866-872,
1990[Abstract].
48.
Wasserman, K,
Van Kessel AL,
and
Burton GG.
Interaction of physiological mechanisms during exercise.
J Appl Physiol
22:
71-85,
1967[Free Full Text].