Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 91: 1011-1013, 2001;
8750-7587/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenhaff, P.
Right arrow Articles by Donovan, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenhaff, P.
Right arrow Articles by Donovan, C.
Vol. 91, Issue 2, 1011-1013, August 2001

Look Before You Leap

The following is the abstract of the article discussed in the subsequent letter:


    ABSTRACT

McMillen, J., C. M. Donovan, J. I. Messer, and W. T. Willis. Energetic driving forces are maintained in resting rat skeletal muscle after dietary creatine supplementation. J Appl Physiol 90: 62-66, 2001.---The total creatine (TCr) pool of skeletal muscle is composed of creatine (Cr) and phosphocreatine (PCr). In resting skeletal muscle, the ratio of PCr to TCr (PCr/TCr; PCr energy charge) is ~0.6-0.8, depending on the fiber type. PCr/TCr is linked to the cellular free energy of ATP hydrolysis by the Cr kinase equilibrium. Dietary Cr supplementation increases TCr in skeletal muscle. However, many previous studies have reported data indicating that PCr/TCr falls after supplementation, which would suggest that Cr supplementation alters the resting energetic state of myocytes. This study investigated the effect of Cr supplementation on the energy phosphates of resting skeletal muscle. Male rats were fed either rodent chow (control) or chow supplemented with 2% (wt/wt) Cr. After 2 wk on the diet, the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles were freeze clamped and removed from anesthetized animals. Cr supplementation increased TCr, PCr, and Cr levels in the gastrocnemius by 20, 22, and 17%, respectively (P < 0.05). A numerical 6% higher mean soleus TCr in Cr-supplemented rats was not statistically significant. All other energy phosphate concentrations, free energy of ATP hydrolysis, and PCr/TCr were not different between the two groups in either muscle. We conclude that Cr supplementation simply increased TCr in fast-twitch rat skeletal muscle but did not otherwise alter resting cellular energetic state.


    LETTER

Look Before You Leap

To the Editor: In the article by McMillen et al. (5), the authors set out "to evaluate the effect of dietary creatine supplementation on the energy phosphate status of resting soleus and gastrocnemius muscles in the rat." They hypothesized "that dietary creatine supplementation would not alter the phosphocreatine/total creatine ratio in resting type I or type II skeletal muscle," having cited, but subsequently dismissed, a whole series of independent studies involving healthy human volunteers showing the contrary [i.e., the ratio declined because most of the increase in total creatine (TCr) being in the form of free creatine (Cr)].

The authors reported that feeding rats chow containing 2% (wt/wt) Cr for 2 wk had, first, no effect on soleus muscle free Cr, phosphocreatine (PCr), and TCr contents. Second, it increased free Cr, PCr, and TCr contents in the gastrocnemius muscle but did not change the PCr-to-TCr ratio. The authors concluded, "Cr supplementation increased TCr in rat fast-twitch skeletal muscle. Because no change in the PCr/TCr occurred, Cr supplementation simply provided an increased TCr content and metabolic capacitance in skeletal muscle."

It is the opinion of this reader that the authors have neglected to compare their own muscle metabolite data with analogous published work; as a result, they have arrived at a spurious conclusion. In particular, comparison of the data presented in Fig. 1 (Ref. 5) with the literature shows that the free Cr concentration of the gastrocnemius (~7.5 µmol/g wet wt) was ~50% lower than that routinely reported for white gastrocnemius and ~30% lower than that reported for red gastrocnemius (e.g., Refs. 3 and 7; the authors do not report whether they analyzed red or white gastrocnemius). Furthermore, the gastrocnemius free Cr concentration shown in Fig. 1 is depicted to be the same as that measured in soleus, which is also contrary to what has been widely published previously (it is ~40-75% higher in red and white gastrocnemius, respectively; Ref. 3).

With this information in mind, and given that ATP and PCr contents of the gastrocnemius depicted in Table 1 and Fig. 1 were comparable with that shown in published literature for red gastrocnemius (3, 7), it seems that the authors found the PCr-to-TCr ratio to be unchanged by Cr supplementation simply because they failed to measure muscle free Cr concentration correctly. This could be at least partly attributable to the authors failing to use independent methods for PCr and Cr determination.

The authors state in their discussion that they were not surprised by their findings because they can think of no compelling reasons to suspect that Cr supplementation would compromise the forces or flows generated by mitochondria. This statement reflects a bias on the part of the authors because they failed to refer to published evidence in support of the existence of the "creatine-phosphocreatine circuit" in the manuscript. Indeed, contrary to the view of McMillen et al. (5), there is substantial evidence to support the view that a change in the cellular Cr concentration is an important regulator of cellular energetics in vivo (1, 6, 8, 9).

It is also important to appreciate that the lack of an effect of Cr supplementation on Cr and PCr concentrations in rat soleus muscle reported by McMillen et al. (5) illustrates that it is unwise for investigators to use an animal model that will not allow the hypothesis under scrutiny to be tested.

Finally, the authors cite their own animal-based study, and that of Brannon et al. (2), to indicate that type II muscle becomes better suited for burst activity following Cr supplementation. However, they failed to mention that this was clearly shown to be the case and moreover was shown in human type II fibers several years previously (4).


    REFERENCES

1.   Bessmann, SP, and Geiger PJ. Transport of energy in cells: the phosphorylcreatine shuttle. Science 211: 448-452, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Brannon, TA, Adams GR, Conniff CL, and Baldwin KM. Effects of creatine loading and training on running performance and biochemical properties of rat skeletal muscle. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29: 489-495, 1997[Web of Science][Medline].

3.   Campbell, CB, Marsh DR, and Spriet LL. Anaerobic energy provision in aged skeletal muscle during tetanic stimulation. J Appl Physiol 70: 1787-1795, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Casey, A, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Howell S, Hultman E, and Greenhaff PL. Creatine supplementation favorably affects performance and muscle metabolism during maximal intensity exercise in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 271: E31-E37, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5.   McMillen, JC, Donovan CM, Messer JI, and Willis WT. Energetic driving forces are maintained in resting rat skeletal muscle after dietary creatine supplementation. J Appl Physiol 90: 62-66, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Saks, VA, Khuchua ZA, Vasilyeva EV, Belikova OY, and Kuznetsov AV. Metabolic compartmentation and substrate channelling in muscle cells. Role of coupled creatine kinases in vivo regulation of cellular respiration---a synthesis. Mol Cell Biochem 133/134: 155-192, 1994.

7.   Spriet, LL. ATP utilization and provision in fast-twitch skeletal muscle during tetanic contractions. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 257: E595-E605, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Wallimann, T, Wyss M, Brdiczka D, Nicolay K, and Eppenberger HM. Intracellular compartmentation, structure and function of creatine kinase isoenzymes in tissues with high and fluctuating energy demands: the "phosphocreatine circuit" for cellular energy homeostasis. Biochem J 281: 21-40, 1992.

9.   Wallimann, T, Schlattner U, Guerrero L, and Dodler M. The phosphocreatine circuit and creatine supplementation, both come of age! In: Guanidino Compounds 5, edited by Mori A, Ishida M, and Clark JF.. Tokyo, Japan: Blackwell Science, 1999, p. 117-129.

Paul Greenhaff,
School of Biomedical Sciences
University Medical School
Queen's Medical Centre
Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom


    REPLY

To The Editor: Greenhaff and his collaborators have indeed published "a whole series of independent studies" reporting decreased phosphocreatine (PCr) to total creatine (TCr) ratios in resting human skeletal muscle in response to dietary creatine (Cr) supplementation (Cr-Sup). However, they have seemingly dismissed the rather profound implications this purported finding would bring on the resting metabolic rate of creatine-loaded skeletal muscle.

We are not biased against the "Cr-PCr energy circuit" as Greenhaff suggests. We studied resting skeletal muscle. There is general agreement that the creatine kinase reaction maintains thermodynamic equilibrium in resting muscle (14). Under this condition, the energy phosphate system possesses only one degree of freedom (5); thus all kinetic (4, 13, 18) and energetic (6, 16) models of respiratory control reduce to the same prediction: a fall in PCr/TCr should result in an elevated rate of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Thus the bias that Greenhaff seems to believe is present in our report would have no bearing on our conclusions in any case because the molecular signals of all models are linked by the equilibrium. Greenhaff and his co-authors must include themselves in this consensus view, as evidenced by their use of the creatine kinase equilibrium to calculate the free ADP concentration ([ADP]f) of resting skeletal muscle (11). With their calculation, they reported that the fall in PCr/TCr after Cr-Sup indicated a ~24% increase in [ADP]f in resting myocytes, to quote (11) "our findings point to Cr supplementation having a substantial impact on cellular energetics." Substantial indeed, especially since the mitochondrial response to ADP has been shown to be at least second order (13). For example, using an S0.5 for ADP of 44 µM (13), the most conservative Hill coefficient of two, and the values for resting [ADP]f reported by Green et al. (11) would predict that Cr-Sup increases the resting ATP turnover of myocytes by >40%. We were curious as to what cellular energy-conserving or energy-dissipating reactions might accommodate such an impressive increase in mitochondrial energy delivery in resting Cr-Sup cells and why such profound implications of decreased PCr/TCr appeared to be of no concern. On the other hand, it was conceivable that Cr-Sup impaired mitochondrial sensitivity to the signal(s); thus resting metabolic rate would remain unchanged in the face of a depressed energy phosphate status. A final possibility was that Cr-Sup precipitated a phosphate (Pi) limitation. Because we are interested in the control of mitochondrial respiration, we carried out a complete assessment of the impact of Cr-Sup on muscle energy phosphates, including enzymatically assayed Pi. We found that a modest 20% rise in TCr resulted in neither any predicted rise in resting metabolic rate nor any impairment in the ability of mitochondria to maintain the resting cellular energy state, an outcome we sincerely consider unsurprising. Thus we agree that "creatine concentration is an important regulator of cellular energetics in vivo." This is why we did the study and why a Cr term appears in three of the five equations of our paper. As we discussed (15), unchanged PCr/TCr in human skeletal muscle after Cr-Sup has been reported by Febbraio et al. (10).

In response to Greenhaff's criticism of our assay, we would point out that the colorimetric assay for Cr and PCr we employed (8) has been widely used for decades (e.g., Refs. 7, 17, 19). The colorimetric assay correlates with the enzymatic assay demonstrating a slope of unity and r = 0.997 (1), achieves ~100% recovery of Cr added to tissue samples (9), and has no interfering molecules in skeletal muscle (9). Our own pilot data confirmed all of these published reports. In addition, the colorimetric assay provides an extinction coefficient about twice that of NAD+-linked assays, all Cr and PCr assays were run in triplicate, and the coefficient of variation of the assay in our hands is <3%. Our assay indicated that dietary Cr-Sup increased TCr in rat whole gastrocnemius muscle by 20%, and the unchanged PCr/TCr we measured before and after dietary Cr-Sup is very close to, but slightly below, published values (5). This directionality is opposite to the criticism advanced by Greenhaff.

In the past, Greenhaff et al. (3) ascribed little relevance to type I fiber creatine status, yet he now expresses concern that the rat soleus fails to exhibit increased TCr in response to Cr-Sup (2, 15). However, if we had defined "Cr-responders" as only those Cr-Sup solei demonstrating TCr above the mean value of the control group (a strategy inspired by the human study in Ref. 12), then Cr-Sup would have yielded 28% higher TCr in our soleus "responders" but still no change in PCr/TCr.


    REFERENCES

1.   Beyer, C, and Alting IH. Enzymatic measurement of creatine in erythrocytes. Clin Chem 42: 313-318, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Brannon, TA, Adams GR, Conniff CL, and Baldwin KM. Effects of creatine loading and training on running performance and biochemical properties of rat skeletal muscle. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29: 489-495, 1997.

3.   Casey, A, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Howell S, Hultman E, and Greenhaff PL. Creatine ingestion favorably affects performance and muscle metabolism during maximal exercise in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 271: E31-E37, 1996.

4.   Chance, B, Leigh JS, Clark BJ, Marris J, Kent J, Nioka S, and Smith D. Control of oxidative metabolism and oxygen delivery in human skeletal muscle: a steady-state analysis of the work/energy cost transfer function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 8384-8388, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5.   Connett, RJ. Analysis of metabolic control: new insights using scaled creatine kinase model. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 254: R949-R959, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Connett, RJ, and Honig CR. Regulation of VO2 in red muscle: do current biochemical hypotheses fit in vivo data. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 256: R898-R906, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   De Saedeleer, M, and Marechal G. Chemical energy usage during isometric twitches of frog sartorius muscle intoxicated with an isomer of creatine, beta -guanidinopropionate. Pflügers Arch 402: 185-189, 1984[Web of Science][Medline].

8.   Dubnoff, JW. Methods Enzymol 3: 635-650, 1957.

9.   Ennor, AH. The estimation of creatine. Biochem J 42: 557-563, 1948.

10.   Febbraio, MA, Flanagan TR, Snow RJ, Zhao S, and Carey MF. Effect of creatine supplementation on intramuscular TCr, metabolism, and performance during intermittent, supramaximal exercise in humans. Acta Physiol Scand 155: 387-395, 1995[Web of Science][Medline].

11.   Green, AL, Hultman E, Macdonald IA, Sewell DA, and Greenhaff PL. Carbohydrate ingestion augments skeletal muscle creatine accumulation during creatine supplementation in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 271: E821-E826, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   Greenhaff, PL, Bodin K, Soderlund K, and Hultman E. Effect of oral creatine supplementation on skeletal muscle phosphocreatine resynthesis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 266: E725-E730, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Jeneson, JAL, Wiseman RW, Westerhoff HV, and Kushmerick MJ. The signal transduction for oxidative phosphorylation is at least second order in ADP. J Biol Chem 271: 27995-27998, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Kushmerick, MJ. Energy balance in muscle activity: simulations of ATPase coupled to oxidative phosphorylation and to creatine kinase. Comp Biochem Physiol B 120: 109-123, 1998[Medline].

15.   McMillen, J, Donovan CM, Messer JI, and Willis WT. Energetic driving forces are maintained in resting rat skeletal muscle after dietary creatine supplementation. J Appl Physiol 90: 62-66, 2001.

16.   Meyer, RA. A linear model of muscle respiration explains monoexponential phosphocreatine changes. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 254: C548-C553, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

17.   Shoubridge, EA, and Radda GK. A 31P-nuclear magnetic resonance study of skeletal muscle metabolism in rats depleted of creatine with the analogue beta -guanidinopropionic acid. Biochim Biophys Acta 805: 79-88, 1984[Medline].

18.   Walliman, T, Wyss M, Brdiczka D, Nicolay K, and Eppenberger HM. Intracellular compartmentation, structure and function of creatine kinase isoenzymes in tissues with high and fluctuating energy demands: the "phosphocreatine circuit" for cellular energy homeostasis. Biochem J 281: 21-40, 1992.

19.   Zweier, JL, and Jacobus WE. Bioenergetic consequences of cardiac phosphocreatine depletion induced by creatine analogue feeding. J Biol Chem 266: 20296-20304, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Wayne Willis,
Jennifer McMillen,
Exercise and Sport Research Institute
Arizona State University
Tempe, Arizona 85287-0404
waynewillis{at}asu.edu
Casey Donovan,
Department of Kinesiology
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California 90089-0652


J APPL PHYSIOL 91(2):1011-1013
8750-7587/01 $5.00 Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
H. E. Kan, E. Meeuwissen, J. J. van Asten, A. Veltien, D. Isbrandt, and A. Heerschap
Creatine uptake in brain and skeletal muscle of mice lacking guanidinoacetate methyltransferase assessed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2007; 102(6): 2121 - 2127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenhaff, P.
Right arrow Articles by Donovan, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenhaff, P.
Right arrow Articles by Donovan, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online