|
|
||||||||
O2 and heart rate
kinetics in cycling: transitions from an elevated baseline
Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Department of Nutrition, Food and Exercise Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee Florida 32306
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The purpose of this
study was to examine oxygen consumption
(
O2) and heart rate kinetics during
moderate and repeated bouts of heavy square-wave cycling from an
exercising baseline. Eight healthy, male volunteers performed
square-wave bouts of leg ergometry above and below the gas exchange
threshold separated by recovery cycling at 35%
O2 peak.
O2 and heart rate kinetics were modeled,
after removal of phase I data by use of a biphasic on-kinetics and
monoexponential off-kinetics model. Fingertip capillary blood was
sampled 45 s before each transition for base excess,
HCO

oxygen uptake kinetics; cycling
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
AT THE ONSET OF
AN ABRUPT INCREASE in work rate (square-wave exercise), ATP
consumption rises immediately, whereas oxygen consumption
(
O2) increases more slowly. What keeps
O2 from rising immediately to its
steady-state level? Are the kinetics a function of metabolic inertia,
or is delivery of oxygen to blame? Below the gas-exchange threshold
(GET; moderate exercise), metabolic inertia is believed the
limiting factor (17, 19). Controversy remains for
transitions above the GET (heavy exercise), where
O2 kinetics are more complex.
In heavy exercise, the kinetics incorporate at least two components
[beyond the initial phase I component (32)] that
manifest in series (4). An intrinsic property of a system
where components manifest in series is that the mean response time may
be altered by changes to the component time constants, amplitudes,
and/or time delays. For example, the mean response time may decrease by
decreasing the component time constants without changing component amplitudes, by changing the ratio of the amplitudes with no change in
the time constants, or by an earlier slow-component onset despite invariant time constants and amplitudes. Therefore, the conclusions of
previous studies that were focused on the mean response time (7,
15, 23) are not easily applied to understanding the underlying
physiology of such a complex system. Without a detailed analysis of the
O2 kinetic components, the issue of
metabolic inertia or oxygen delivery for heavy exercise remains unresolved.
This study was driven by the hypothesis that the rate of increase in
O2 in heavy square-wave exercise is set
by metabolic state (inertia and demand) and is not limited by the
ability of the cardiovascular system to deliver oxygen in healthy
adults. Therefore, it was postulated that 1) there would be
no difference in the initial (fast component) time constant among
moderate and repeated heavy transitions; 2) systemic
acidosis would not be a necessary condition for the speeded mean
response time in the second heavy bout (acidosis was previously
implicated in improving perfusion and we hypothesized perfusion is not
the limiting factor); and 3) cardiac output kinetics could
be dissociated from the
O2 response.
To this end, an elevated baseline (~35%
O2 peak, ~60% GET) was used, which
differs from the typically employed unloaded cycling baseline. The
elevated baseline was used, in part, to enhance recovery (addressing
hypothesis 2); an active recovery of this moderate intensity
is optimal for speeding systemic metabolic recovery (13).
Moreover, an elevated baseline may slow heart rate kinetics
(21) and was used in this study for its potential to
dissociate
O2 and heart rate during the
nonsteady state (addressing hypothesis 3). The elevated
baseline was expected to raise baseline cardiac output, setting stroke
volume closer to its plateau (25) and to allow more
reliable inferences to cardiac output kinetics directly from the heart
rate response (also addressing hypothesis 3). This work rate
(~35%
O2 peak, ~60% GET) has been shown to maximize parasympathetic withdrawal, leaving the slower, sympathetic nervous system to mediate increases in heart rate and
cardiac output (33).
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects. Eight healthy male volunteers experienced with cycling on a stationary ergometer gave written informed consent to participate in this study. The procedures were approved by the Florida State University Human Subjects Review Board. Subjects were 27 ± 3 yr old, 177 ± 4 cm tall, and 72 ± 8 kg in body mass.
Preparation. Subjects were prohibited from alcohol and strenuous activity for 24 h and from caffeine for 15 h before arrival in the laboratory. No one reported taking dietary supplements or ergogenic aids aside from vitamin/mineral supplements. Subjects consumed a light carbohydrate meal 2-3 h before arrival in the laboratory and repeated this meal before all test days. Testing was at the same time of day, ±2 h, for each subject. Subjects were not permitted to cycle to the laboratory and remained sedentary in the testing area for at least 30 min before each test.
Testing. Subjects cycled at 90 rpm on an electrically braked leg ergometer (Lode, Groningen, Netherlands) on 4 separate testing days. Ninety revolutions per minute was the approximate mean preferred cadence among the subjects and the one most often chosen on a blinded familiarization day. Cadence differences appear to alter the kinetics response only to a small degree within the typically employed range (3).
Gas exchange was measured every breath with a Parvomedics MMS-2400 system (Consentius Technologies, Salt Lake City, UT). Total dead space of the system (mouthpiece, valve, collection tube, pneumotach, mixing chamber, and sampling tube) was 4.98 liters. A seven-point flowmeter calibration was made before each test with a 3-liter syringe (Hans Rudolph, Kansas City, MO) at rates that spanned the expected measurements. Gas calibration was made immediately before each test, with gases spanning the range of O2 and CO2 expected during data collection. The first day was a test for
O2 peak (1 W/5 s) and continued until the cadence could not be maintained despite
verbal encouragement. The GET was defined as the break in slope of the CO2 production
(
CO2)-
O2
relationship by use of Levenberg-Marquadt estimation to identify the
intersection of two lines that minimized the sum of the squared
residuals. Starting values in the iteration procedures were 1.0 for the
initial slope, threshold estimated visually (30), and 1.3 for the upper slope. The computer-identified GET was, in all cases, in
close agreement with the visually identified
CO2-
O2 break.
The last three sessions were divided into one moderate (Mod) and two
heavy (Hvy) exercise days, which were completed in random order. On
each day, after a 5-min baseline warm-up at a
O2 of 35% peak, subjects completed two
10-min cycling periods at an elevated work rate, separated by 10 min of
baseline recovery cycling. The elevated work rate was either a
O2 of 90% GET (Mod) or a
O2 of 30% of the difference between GET
and
O2 peak (30%
; Hvy). Test
sessions for a given subject were separated by
2 days.
The
O2 responses for the 2 Hvy
transition days were time aligned. To remove nonphysiological datum
points resulting from coughing, sneezing, etc., any breaths more than
four standard deviations away from the mean of the surrounding six
breaths (3 before and 3 after) were deleted. The decision to remove
these points was confirmed visually to ensure that only clearly
nonphysiological outliers were deleted; these amounted to about six to
eight breaths over the 10-min period for each test. The superimposed
data set was then smoothed (rolling five-breath average).
Because the elevated baseline is different from the unloaded cycling
baseline in previous studies (15, 23), we preliminarily analyzed the two Mod bouts separately. There was no difference (paired
t-test) between the two Mod bouts for any on- or off-kinetic parameter (P > 0.05). Therefore, the two Mod bouts,
completed on the same day, were time aligned and averaged to produce a
single response, which enhances confidence in model fitting
(22).
Before modeling, each test was examined for a steady state. Accurate
and complete kinetic modeling is not assured without establishing, or
rigorously estimating, a steady state for the parameter(s) to be
modeled. Linear regression was applied to the final 3 min of data for
each average response. The 95% confidence interval for each regression
slope was examined; in all cases, the 95% confidence interval included
zero. This was the basis for deciding that a steady state had been
reached. To further confirm the steady state, the 9- to 10-min average
O2 was compared with the modeled
asymptote (paired t-test) and was not different (P > 0.05).
As described by Whipp and colleagues (32), the phase I
component (9) was removed before modeling by visually
analyzing the
O2 and respiratory
exchange ratio (RER) responses for each transition. Initially,
O2 kinetics were modeled using a
monoexponential formula (Eq. 1) to compare these
results with the faster mean response time (MRT) reported previously
(7, 15, 23). The MRT was calculated as
TD1 +
1. After a significant speeding
of the overall kinetics (smaller MRT in the second bout) was found, gas
exchange data were modeled using a biphasic formula with independent time delays (Eq. 2)
|
(1) |
|
(2) |
O2(t) is whole
body
O2 at time t, B is
baseline (warm-up)
O2 calculated as the
average
O2 over the last 2 min of
warm-up, A1 and A2 are the fast and
slow-component amplitudes, respectively, TD1 and
TD2 are their respective time delays, and
1
and
2 are their respective time constants. Invariably,
the slow component (A2) regressed toward zero in the Mod
transitions; therefore, the Mod bouts were reanalyzed using a
monoexponential formula (Eq. 1).
Each amplitude component was allowed to begin only after its time
delay. Confidence in the time constant (
1) was 2.23 ± 0.41 s in Hvy1, 2.34 ± 0.45 s in
Hvy2, and 4.53 ± 0.89 s in Mod, based on
formulas reported by Lamarra and colleagues (22).
Off-kinetics were initially modeled using a biphasic formula; however,
the model consistently regressed to a monoexponential function of time
(the time constants for the two components were not different).
Therefore, the off-kinetics were modeled using a monoexponential
equation
|
(3) |
O2 is end-exercise
O2 with the other parameters as
described above; the prime mark (') designates these as off-kinetics parameters.
Heart rate (HR) was monitored telemetrically (Polar Electro, Woodbury,
NY) and recorded online at the end of every breath (signaled from the
pneumotach). The data were then superimposed, averaged, filtered, and
modeled in the identical manner as for the
O2 data. Therefore, the heavy
transitions were modeled much like the method used by Engelen and
colleagues (14). The justification for choosing the
biphasic model is that visual analysis clearly revealed a fast phase
approaching a plateau with a subsequent delayed rise. These response
characteristics were particularly clear after averaging of the two responses.
As described by Stringer and colleagues (29),
cardiac output (
) was estimated as
=
O2/[5.721 + (0.1047 × %
O2 peak)]. Stroke volume (SV) was
estimated as SV =
/HR.
Capillary blood was taken from a fingertip 45 s before each of the
two abrupt increases in work rate. Blood lactate (Accusport, Indianapolis, IN), pH, base excess, and [HCO
1
point above and 1 point below the expected measurement).
Gains for the responses were calculated as the fast-component gain,
G1 = A1/
W, and total gain,
GT = (A1+A2)/
W.
Statistics.
Paired t-tests were used to compare the initial MRTs between
the two Hvy transitions. Paired t-tests were used to compare A1, A2, TD2,
2,
'A1, G1, base excess,
[HCO
O2, baseline HR, TD1,
1, GT, 'TD1,
and '
1 among the Mod and two Hvy transitions; subjects
served as blocks, the category of comparison as the fixed factor, and
the measurement as the dependent variable. Tukey's post hoc
comparisons were used whenever overall significance was found to
identify the differing pairs. Paired t-tests were used to
compare time delays and time constants between the
O2 and HR responses. Pearson moment
correlations were computed for each bout (Mod, Hvy1,
Hvy2) between
O2
1 and HR
1. Alpha was set at P = 0.05.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
O2 peak and GET were 60 ± 3 ml
O2 · kg
1 · min
1
and 58 ± 7% peak, respectively. Blood lactate and pH returned to
baseline before the onset of the second bout ([La
]:
1st = 1.78 ± 0.34 mM , 2nd = 2.24 ± 0.64 mM; pH: 1st = 7.38 ± 0.01, 2nd = 7.38 ± 0.02; mean ± SD). In contrast, base excess and
[HCO
0.96 ± 1.11 mM; [HCO
Actual work rates were baseline 35.6 ± 5.2%
O2 peak or 60.5 ± 10.2% GET, Mod
asymptote 52.2 ± 5.9%
O2 peak or
89.9 ± 7.2% GET, and Hvy asymptote 69.4 ± 7.1%
O2 peak or 27.2 ± 13.2%
.
O2.
Initial analysis of mean response times revealed a significant speeding
of the overall kinetics in Hvy2 (MRT: 1st = 55.5 ± 10.1 s, 2nd = 44.3 ± 7.7 s). The on-transition
parameters are given in Table 1.
Subject 6, for whom the first Hvy bout generated a
slow-component amplitude of 92 ml O2/min, demonstrated
monoexponential kinetics in the second bout (A2 regressed
to zero). Therefore, comparisons between the two bouts for
O2 slow-component parameters (A2, TD2,
2) were made with
seven subjects. The amplitude and gain of the fast component
(A1, A1/W) were significantly larger than in
the first bout, as was the overall projected asymptote for the fast
component (B + A1). The time constant of the fast component was not different among Mod, Hvy1, and
Hvy2. The amplitude of the slow component (A2)
was significantly smaller in Hvy2 than in Hvy1.
The onset of the slow component (TD2) was significantly later in Hvy2 and its time constant (
2) was
significantly smaller than in Hvy1. The
O2 asymptote and overall gain
(GT) was not different between Hvy1 and
Hvy2. The two Hvy bouts for subject 5 are shown
superimposed in Fig. 1.
|
|
|
HR.
The on-transition kinetics of the heart rate responses are shown in
Table 1. For subject 7, the kinetics were monoexponential in
both Hvy bouts. The time delay (TD2) for the slow component of the HR kinetics was significantly longer in Hvy2 than in
Hvy1 and was not significantly different from
TD2 for
O2 in either bout.
The initial rise in HR (A1) for the two Hvy bouts was not different, and its time constant was not different among the Mod and
the two Hvy bouts. However, in each case, the time constant (
1) was significantly longer than for
O2. Furthermore, the HR and
O2 fast-component time constants
(
1) were not significantly correlated (Fig.
2). The slow component of HR kinetics had
a smaller amplitude and time constant in Hvy2 than in
Hvy1; the time constant was not significantly different
from the
O2
2 for the same
bout. There was a significantly lower HR asymptote in Hvy2
than in Hvy1.
|
O2 in the same bouts.
Estimated
and SV comparisons are given in Fig.
3. Estimated stroke volume was not
different across conditions; the elevated baseline appeared to serve
its purpose in raising stroke volume to a plateau. Therefore, it is
assumed that HR was responsible for any changes in
and that HR
kinetics reflect
kinetics.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The primary finding in the present study was that a faster MRT in
repeated heavy transitions is not due to a smaller fast-component time
constant but to a relative shift in kinetic amplitudes (larger A1 and smaller A2) with the same final
asymptote. It was further demonstrated that HR (and presumably
)
kinetics can be dissociated from
O2
kinetics with a baseline of ~35%
O2 peak.
Burnley and colleagues (8) modeled repeated heavy
transitions from a 20-W baseline and demonstrated a greater
fast-component asymptote with invariant time constant (~25 s). Thus
the faster MRT in repeated heavy transitions does not appear to be the
result of faster initial kinetics regardless of baseline work rate.
This leads to the conclusion that factors limiting
1 are
not different in repeated bouts.
It has been demonstrated that previous leg (7, 15, 23) and previous arm (7) exercise results in a faster MRT in a subsequent bout of heavy leg ergometry. If a shift in the relative amplitudes is the cause of the faster MRT, then what causes these changes even when the previous exercise is in a different muscle group?
A potential mechanism for shifts in kinetic component amplitudes. Bangsbo and colleagues (1) reported that previous heavy arm exercise caused a greater potassium loss from subsequently exercising legs than in the control (no previous arm exercise) condition and concluded that elevated potassium concentration in the leg interstitium was an important mediator of fatigue. We hypothesize that previous heavy exercise (arm or leg) disrupts the sarcolemmal electrochemical gradient through elevated extracellular potassium concentration in the leg interstitium, as reported by Bangsbo and colleagues. The resulting fatigue would demand the recruitment of additional, potentially less economic fibers to begin the subsequent bout and mediate a greater fast-component asymptote, as modeled in the present study and recently by others (8).
Oxygen demand over the pre-TD2 period is no greater than the observed A1 asymptote (5). Consistent with this, Grassi and colleagues (16) demonstrated that elevating pretransition O2 delivery along with adenosine infusion (to induce vasodilation) in maximally stimulated mammalian muscle speeds
1 without altering A1. These demonstrations support the conclusion that the
greater A1 in Hvy2 was the result of a greater
oxygen demand (potentially from additionally recruited fibers), not the
removal of a delivery limitation. Dispersing the same work rate over a
larger motor unit pool at the onset of Hvy2 would lead to
less fatigue of individual myocytes, demanding a smaller additional
recruitment in the slow-component period to maintain force
output. This is supported by the present data showing 1) a
later slow-component onset (consistent with a better ability to sustain
the initial change in work rate without fatigue), 2) a
smaller slow-component time constant (consistent with a reduced need to
serially recruit new myocytes with developing fatigue), and
3) a smaller slow-component amplitude (consistent with a
smaller net increase in motor unit recruitment). These considerations
are consistent with the prevailing theory that the slow component is
the result of increased motor unit recruitment (3, 6, 28,
31).
In contrast to the present study, Burnley and colleagues
(8) found the overall asymptote to be lower in the second
bout. This is most likely a methodological difference; Burnley and
colleagues (8) used 6-min bouts resulting in termination
of the exercise at a time when only ~50% of the apparent slow
component had developed (before one time constant had elapsed). The
10-min bouts in the present study included >85% of the slow-component
data (i.e., >2
2), and the
O2 time slope was not different from
zero over the last minutes of each bout. Short bouts may not allow for
a full adjustment to the work rate and may lead to inaccurate modeling. However, it is possible that differences in the two studies exist that
facilitated a truly smaller asymptote in their study (8), but these must await further investigation. Because the final asymptote
was not different across bouts in the current study, it is assumed that
the same final motor unit pool was recruited (or its metabolic
equivalent) and that the primary difference between the two bouts was
in the partitioning of recruitment order.
An elevated baseline may speed
O2
kinetics (11, 12), although this is not a universal
conclusion (21). An intriguing finding in the present
study was the similar
1 for moderate and heavy
transitions (Table 1). In contrast,
1 is usually
significantly slower in heavy compared with moderate transitions;
note that we used a baseline of moderate exercise, whereas
previous studies have used a light or unloaded baseline (8, 14,
24). Grassi and colleagues (16) showed that
elevated pretransition oxygen availability could significantly speed
1 from ~25 to ~18 s. These values are remarkably
similar to the
1 of ~19 s in the present study with an
elevated baseline and the ~25-s
1 generally reported using a light or unloaded baseline (2-4, 8, 14, 24).
It is possible that our elevated baseline facilitated a pretransition increase in oxygen availability for newly recruited motor units. A
mechanism for this is illustrated by the elegant work of Segal and
colleagues (for reviews, see Refs. 26 and 27), which has demonstrated local vasoactive metabolites may activate upstream vasodilation. Due to the structure of the capillary bed, this vasodilation increases oxygen availability to both active and inactive
fibers. Should the inactive fibers be required for the subsequent
increase in work rate, they would then have sufficient oxygen to
rapidly accelerate oxidative metabolism, potentially speeding
1. However, there is variability among laboratories and
subjects larger than the ~18- to ~25-s differences suggested here.
Thus it is emphasized that these ideas are speculation only and deserve
further research.
HR kinetics. The present results are consistent with the ability to slow HR kinetics by using an elevated baseline work rate (20, 21). The elevated baseline effectively removes the more rapid influence of the parasympathetic system (33).
The complexity of the HR response to heavy square-wave transitions has previously been observed (14, 18) and modeled into fast and slow components as in the present study (14). Engelen and colleagues (14) showed that HR
1 was
slower than
O2
1 by ~15
s, although no statistical comparison was given. Significant dissociation of HR
1 (and presumably cardiac output
1) and
O2
1 in the present study emphasizes the importance of local blood flow
control in matching oxygen demand and delivery during the nonsteady state.
Off-kinetics. Because the off-kinetics reduced to a monoexponential function, the two phases of the on-kinetics (the fast and slow phases) appear to have equivalent and coincident recovery profiles, at least to the extent that mathematical modeling could detect a difference in these subjects. The off-kinetics time delays and time constants were not different among the Mod and Hvy bouts.
A recent study with the use of unloaded pedaling as a baseline and designed to investigate this issue directly has also concluded that the off-kinetics of
O2 are "independent of
the magnitude of the contribution to the slow phase from the
on-transient kinetics" (10). These investigators found
the off-kinetics well fit by including a slow phase, beginning with the
fast phase, that had a small amplitude and large time constant. We did
not find a slow phase component to the off-kinetics. The difference may
be due to either the different baselines or the longer recovery time in
the study of Cunningham and colleagues (10) (15 min vs.
our 10 min). Because our elevated baseline is known to speed recovery (13), it is more likely that baseline work rate was the
culprit. Thus the slow phase of recovery may be representative of
metabolic processes still demanded at our moderate intensity and
therefore not a part of the recovery profile in this study.
Nevertheless, the two studies are in agreement that whatever causes the
slow component appears to begin recovery immediately upon cessation of
the exercise, recovers more rapidly than it developed and does so in
parallel with the fast component of recovery.
In conclusion, repeated bouts of heavy exercise in this study resulted
in a smaller MRT, mediated by an increase in the fast-component amplitude, similar fast-component time constant, and similar final steady state; systemic acidosis was not necessary for the faster MRT.
HR (and presumably
) kinetics may be slowed and dissociated from
O2 kinetics with a baseline of mild
exercise. Most important, these data, in conjunction with previous
research, are consistent with a role for local oxygen delivery
limitation at the onset of heavy exercise transitions, which is not
lifted by repeated bouts but may be reduced using a preparatory
baseline of moderate exercise. A role for membrane potential, motor
unit recruitment patterns, and pretransition vasodilation was proposed
to underlie the
O2 kinetics.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. J. Moffatt, 436 Sandels Bldg., Dept. of Nutrition, Food and Exercise Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306 (E-mail: rmoffatt{at}mailer.fsu.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 16 May 2000; accepted in final form 16 January 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Bangsbo, J,
Madsen K,
Kiens B,
and
Richter EA.
Effect of muscle acidity on muscle metabolism and fatigue during intense exercise in man.
J Physiol (Lond)
495:
587-596,
1996[ISI][Medline].
2.
Barstow, TJ,
Casaburi R,
and
Wasserman K.
O2 uptake kinetics and the O2 deficit as related to exercise intensity and blood lactate.
J Appl Physiol
75:
755-762,
1993
3.
Barstow, TJ,
Jones AM,
Nguyen PH,
and
Casaburi R.
Influence of muscle fiber type and pedal frequency on oxygen uptake kinetics of heavy exercise.
J Appl Physiol
81:
1642-1650,
1996
4.
Barstow, TJ,
and
Mole PA.
Linear and nonlinear characteristics of oxygen uptake kinetics during heavy exercise.
J Appl Physiol
71:
2099-2106,
1991
5.
Bearden, SE,
and
Moffatt RJ.
O2 kinetics and the O2 deficit in heavy exercise.
J Appl Physiol
88:
1407-1412,
2000
6.
Bearden SE and Moffatt RJ. Leg electromyography and the
O2-power output relationship during
incremental cycle ergometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc,
2001. In press.
7.
Bohnert, B,
Ward SA,
and
Whipp BJ.
Effects of previous arm exercise on pulmonary gas exchange kinetics during high-intensity leg exercise in humans.
Exp Physiol
83:
557-570,
1998[Abstract].
8.
Burnley, M,
Jones AM,
Carter H,
and
Doust JH.
Effects of previous heavy exercise on phase II pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics during heavy exercise.
J Appl Physiol
89:
1387-1396,
2000
9.
Casaburi, R,
Daly J,
Hansen JE,
and
Effros RM.
Abrupt changes in mixed venous blood gas composition after the onset of exercise.
J Appl Physiol
67:
1106-1112,
1989
10.
Cunningham, DA,
Croix CM,
Paterson DH,
Ozyener F,
and
Whipp BJ.
The off-transient pulmonary oxygen uptake (
O2) kinetics following attainment of a particular
O2 during heavy-intensity exercise in humans.
Exp Physiol
85:
339-347,
2000[Abstract].
11.
Davies, CT,
Di Prampero PE,
and
Cerretelli P.
Kinetics of cardiac output and respiratory gas exchange during exercise and recovery.
J Appl Physiol
32:
618-625,
1972
12.
Di Prampero, PE,
Mahler PB,
Giezendanner D,
and
Cerretelli P.
Effects of priming exercise on
O2 kinetics and O2 deficit at the onset of stepping and cycling.
J Appl Physiol
66:
2023-2031,
1989
13.
Dodd, S,
Powers SK,
Callender T,
and
Brooks E.
Blood lactate disappearance at various intensities of recovery exercise.
J Appl Physiol
57:
1462-1465,
1984
14.
Engelen, M,
Porszasz J,
Riley M,
Wasserman K,
Maehara K,
and
Barstow TJ.
Effects of hypoxic hypoxia on O2 uptake and heart rate kinetics during heavy exercise.
J Appl Physiol
81:
2500-2508,
1996
15.
Gerbino, A,
Ward SA,
and
Whipp BJ.
Effects of previous exercise on pulmonary gas-exchange kinetics during high-intensity exercise in humans.
J Appl Physiol
80:
99-107,
1996
16.
Grassi, B,
Hogan MC,
Kelley KM,
Aschenbach WG,
Hamann JJ,
Evans RK,
Patillo RE,
and
Gladden LB.
Role of convective O2 delivery in determining
O2 on-kinetics in canine muscle contracting at peak
O2.
J Appl Physiol
89:
1293-1301,
2000
17.
Grassi, B,
Poole DC,
Richardson RS,
Knight DR,
Erickson BK,
and
Wagner PD.
Muscle O2 uptake kinetics in humans: implications for metabolic control.
J Appl Physiol
80:
988-998,
1996
18.
Hebestreit, H,
Kriemler S,
Hughson RL,
and
Bar-Or O.
Kinetics of oxygen uptake at the onset of exercise in boys and men.
J Appl Physiol
85:
1833-1841,
1998
19.
Hughson, RL,
Cochrane JE,
and
Butler GC.
Faster O2 uptake kinetics at onset of supine exercise with than without lower body negative pressure.
J Appl Physiol
75:
1962-1967,
1993
20.
Hughson, RL,
and
Morrissey M.
Delayed kinetics of respiratory gas exchange in the transition from previous exercise.
J Appl Physiol
52:
921-929,
1982
21.
Hughson, RL,
and
Morrissey MA.
Delayed kinetics of
O2 in the transition from previous exercise. Evidence for O2 transport limitation of
O2 kinetics: a review.
Int J Sports Med
4:
31-39,
1983[ISI][Medline].
22.
Lamarra, N,
Whipp BJ,
Ward SA,
and
Wasserman K.
Effect of interbreath fluctuations on characterizing exercise gas exchange kinetics.
J Appl Physiol
62:
2003-2012,
1987
23.
MacDonald, M,
Pedersen PK,
and
Hughson RL.
Acceleration of
O2 kinetics in heavy submaximal exercise by hyperoxia and previous high-intensity exercise.
J Appl Physiol
83:
1318-1325,
1997
24.
Paterson, DH,
and
Whipp BJ.
Asymmetries of oxygen uptake transients at the on- and offset of heavy exercise in humans.
J Physiol (Lond)
443:
575-586,
1991
25.
Rowell, LB.
Human Cardiovascular Control. New York: Oxford U. Press, 1993.
26.
Segal, SS.
Integration of blood flow control to skeletal muscle: key role of feed arteries.
Acta Physiol Scand
168:
511-518,
2000[ISI][Medline].
27.
Segal, SS,
and
Kurjiaka DT.
Coordination of blood flow control in the resistance vasculature of skeletal muscle.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
27:
1158-1164,
1995[ISI][Medline].
28.
Shinohara, M,
and
Moritani T.
Increase in neuromuscular activity and oxygen uptake during heavy exercise.
Ann Physiol Anthropol
11:
257-262,
1992[Medline].
29.
Stringer, WW,
Hansen JE,
and
Wasserman K.
Cardiac output estimated noninvasively from oxygen uptake during exercise.
J Appl Physiol
82:
908-912,
1997
30.
Sue, DY,
Wasserman K,
Moricca RB,
and
Casaburi R.
Metabolic acidosis during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Use of the V-slope method for anaerobic threshold determination.
Chest
94:
931-938,
1988
31.
Whipp, BJ.
The slow component of O2 uptake kinetics during heavy exercise.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
26:
1319-1326,
1994[ISI][Medline].
32.
Whipp, BJ,
Ward SA,
Lamarra N,
Davis JA,
and
Wasserman K.
Parameters of ventilatory and gas exchange dynamics during exercise.
J Appl Physiol
52:
1506-1513,
1982
33.
Yamamoto, Y,
Hughson RL,
and
Peterson JC.
Autonomic control of heart rate during exercise studied by heart rate variability spectral analysis.
J Appl Physiol
71:
1136-1142,
1991
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. J. DiMenna, D. P. Wilkerson, M. Burnley, and A. M. Jones Influence of priming exercise on pulmonary O2 uptake kinetics during transitions to high-intensity exercise from an elevated baseline J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2008; 105(2): 538 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Jones, J. Fulford, and D. P. Wilkerson Influence of prior exercise on muscle [phosphorylcreatine] and deoxygenation kinetics during high-intensity exercise in men Exp Physiol, April 1, 2008; 93(4): 468 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ferguson, B. J. Whipp, A. J. Cathcart, H. B. Rossiter, A. P. Turner, and S. A. Ward Effects of prior very-heavy intensity exercise on indices of aerobic function and high-intensity exercise tolerance J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2007; 103(3): 812 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Y. Endo, M. Kobayakawa, R. Kinugasa, S. Kuno, H. Akima, H. B. Rossiter, A. Miura, and Y. Fukuba Thigh muscle activation distribution and pulmonary VO2 kinetics during moderate, heavy, and very heavy intensity cycling exercise in humans Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): R812 - R820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Burnley, J. H. Doust, and A. M. Jones Time required for the restoration of normal heavy exercise VO2 kinetics following prior heavy exercise J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2006; 101(5): 1320 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Jones, N. J. A. Berger, D. P. Wilkerson, and C. L. Roberts Effects of "priming" exercise on pulmonary O2 uptake and muscle deoxygenation kinetics during heavy-intensity cycle exercise in the supine and upright positions J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2006; 101(5): 1432 - 1441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Paterson, J. M. Kowalchuk, and D. H. Paterson Effects of prior heavy-intensity exercise during single-leg knee extension on vO2 kinetics and limb blood flow J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2005; 99(4): 1462 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Tomczak, W. Wojcik, E. F.G. Busse, and R. G. Haennel Phase I and Phase II Oxygen Uptake Kinetics During Atrioventricular Dyssynchrony in Chronotropically Competent Pacemaker Patients Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1782 - 1789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Jos. J. de Koning, C. Foster, J. Lampen, F. Hettinga, and M. F. Bobbert Experimental evaluation of the power balance model of speed skating J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2005; 98(1): 227 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Wilkerson, K. Koppo, T. J. Barstow, and A. M. Jones Effect of prior multiple-sprint exercise on pulmonary O2 uptake kinetics following the onset of perimaximal exercise J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2004; 97(4): 1227 - 1236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Burnley, A. M. Jones, R. L. Hughson, N. Tordi, and S. Perrey Interpreting VO2 kinetics in heavy exercise revisited J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2003; 94(6): 2548 - 2550. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Burnley, J. H. Doust, D. Ball, and A. M. Jones Effects of prior heavy exercise on VO2 kinetics during heavy exercise are related to changes in muscle activity J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2002; 93(1): 167 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||