Journal of Applied Physiology Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 90: 1798-1810, 2001;
8750-7587/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sun, X.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Wasserman, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sun, X.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Wasserman, K.
Vol. 90, Issue 5, 1798-1810, May 2001

Carbon dioxide pressure-concentration relationship in arterial and mixed venous blood during exercise

Xing-Guo Sun, James E. Hansen, William W. Stringer, Hua Ting, and Karlman Wasserman

Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Physiology and Medicine, Harbor-University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, California 90509 - 2910


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

To calculate cardiac output by the indirect Fick principle, CO2 concentrations (CCO2) of mixed venous (C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2) and arterial blood are commonly estimated from PCO2, based on the assumption that the CO2 pressure-concentration relationship (PCO2-CCO2) is influenced more by changes in Hb concentration and blood oxyhemoglobin saturation than by changes in pH. The purpose of the study was to measure and assess the relative importance of these variables, both in arterial and mixed venous blood, during rest and increasing levels of exercise to maximum (Max) in five healthy men. Although the mean mixed venous PCO2 rose from 47 Torr at rest to 59 Torr at the lactic acidosis threshold (LAT) and further to 78 Torr at Max, the C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 rose from 22.8 mM at rest to 25.5 mM at LAT but then fell to 23.9 mM at Max. Meanwhile, the mixed venous pH fell from 7.36 at rest to 7.30 at LAT and to 7.13 at Max. Thus, as work rate increases above the LAT, changes in pH, reflecting changes in buffer base, account for the major changes in the PCO2-CCO2 relationship, causing C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 to decrease, despite increasing mixed venous PCO2. Furthermore, whereas the increase in the arteriovenous CCO2 difference of 2.2 mM below LAT is mainly due to the increase in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2, the further increase in the arteriovenous CCO2 difference of 4.6 mM above LAT is due to a striking fall in arterial CCO2 from 21.4 to 15.2 mM. We conclude that changes in buffer base and pH dominate the PCO2-CCO2 relationship during exercise, with changes in Hb and blood oxyhemoglobin saturation exerting much less influence.

lactic acidosis threshold; maximum oxygen consumption; carbon dioxide transport; arteriovenous carbon dioxide difference; cardiac output


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

OUR LABORATORY RECENTLY demonstrated that direct Fick principle calculated cardiac output using CO2 (COCO2) agrees well with cardiac output using O2 (COO2) in normal subjects at rest and during exercise (51), as predicted by Fick (16). Other investigators, to avoid blood sampling, have calculated COCO2 indirectly (7, 12, 15, 29, 36). This approach, although superficially attractive, pays insufficient attention to the effect of pH and change in buffer base on the accuracy and precision of the estimation of CO2 concentration (CCO2) from PCO2, particularly during work rates at which lactate is increased. Blood CCO2 is influenced by pH, PCO2, Hb concentration, and oxyhemoglobin saturation (SO2). During exercise, the CO2 pressure-concentration relationship (PCO2-CCO2 relationship) may be more complex than the near-linear relationship depicted in textbooks and the original reports (8, 38, 56), because it is assumed that there is no change in buffer base as PCO2 increases. A frequently referenced report, which presents formulas for refining the influences of PCO2, Hb, and SO2 on CCO2 at rest and during exercise, concludes that "the relationship (PCO2-CCO2) is only slightly influenced by changes in pH" (34). Although some investigators recommend correction for acid-base changes (18, 27), most investigators have calculated the arteriovenous CCO2 difference [mixed venous CCO2 (C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2)-arterial CCO2 (CaCO2)] for estimating cardiac output by the indirect Fick method from mixed venous PCO2 (P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2) and arterial PCO2 (PaCO2), correcting only for changes in Hb and SO2, but ignoring pH changes (6, 9-11, 26, 31-33, 35, 37, 42).

It is well known that acidemia due to lactic acidosis occurs with symptom-limiting exercise, both in normal subjects and patients (3, 4, 21, 50-55), resulting in an almost stoichiometric decrease in bicarbonate concentration ([HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>]) as lactate increases (46, 48, 55). This intimate relationship challenges the concept that changes in pH only slightly influence CCO2 during exercise. We measured pH, PCO2, Hb, and SO2 in both arterial and mixed venous blood during progressively increasing work rate exercise to maximum (Max) in normal subjects to determine the relative importance of the changes in pH, Hb, and SO2 on the PCO2-CCO2 relationship and on each component in CO2 transport. We hypothesized that, by ignoring changes in acid-base balance during exercise, major errors result in estimates of CCO2 from PCO2 at work rates above the lactic acidosis threshold (LAT). This could translate into major errors when these values are used to calculate cardiac output by the Fick principle.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

Subjects, Protocol, and Measures

Subjects. The research protocol was approved by the Human Subjects Committee at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center. Informed consent was obtained from five healthy nonsmoking male subjects that participated in the study.

Catheter placement. A flow-directed pulmonary artery catheter (Arrow International, Reading, PA) was introduced via a femoral vein sheath (Cordis, Miami, FL), which had been inserted percutaneously into the right femoral vein and positioned in the main pulmonary artery under direct fluoroscopic guidance. An arterial catheter was placed percutaneously into the left brachial artery. Each catheter was attached to an infusion apparatus (Continu-Flo, Baxter Health Care, Deerfield, IL), which provided a slow, continuous flow (15 ml/h) of heparinized normal saline (1,000 U heparin/l) and allowed periodic bolus flushings.

Exercise protocols. An increasing work rate exercise test was performed on an electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer (type 18070, Gould-Godart, Bilthoven, the Netherlands). The rate of work rate increase (range 25-40 W/min) depended on a preliminary, noninvasive increasing work rate exercise test designed to achieve exhaust in ~10 min. Gas-exchange and heart rate measurements were averaged for each 30-s period during 3 min of rest and 3 min of unloaded pedaling and during the progressively increasing work rate test to maximum tolerance. Pedal frequency was maintained at 60 rpm.

Respired-gas analysis. The subjects respired through a mouthpiece during the test. Expired air was directed to a Fleisch type 3 pneumotachograph via a breathing valve (100-ml dead space). The PO2, PCO2, and partial pressure of N2 at the mouthpiece were continuously measured by mass spectrometry (MGA-1100, Perkin Elmer, Pomona, CA). Minute ventilation (BTPS) and O2 uptake (VO2) and CO2 production (VCO2) (both STPD) were calculated as whole breath averages for each 30-s exercise period, as previously reported (49). The LAT and maximal VO2, defined as the VO2 averaged over the last 30 s of exercise, were determined (4). Later, for tabular and graphic representations of the group response, the VO2 was normalized to LAT with VO2 at LAT set as 1.00 for each subject and all other values on either side of LAT set as a ratio of LAT. Values were calculated at each minute of exercise.

Blood samples. Blood was sampled simultaneously from the pulmonary artery and brachial artery during rest and unloaded cycling and at each minute of increasing work rate exercise. Blood-gas samples were drawn over a 15- to 20-s period. The samples were collected in glass syringes that contained a small amount (mean 0.14 ml) of liquid heparin (1,000 U/ml). The blood samples were agitated to prevent clotting and were immediately placed in an ice slurry.

Blood analyses. Blood-gas analyses were performed by using an Instrumentation Laboratory 1306 blood-gas analyzer (Lexington, MA) for pH, PCO2, and PO2 and an Instrumentation Laboratory 482 CO-oximeter for Hb and SO2. The blood-gas analyzer was recalibrated every 20-30 min. Tonometered blood samples were used to verify accuracy. The measured values were corrected for heparin dilution and the known consistent underestimation of blood PCO2 values >45 Torr (23, 51).

Calculation of CCO2, C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2, COCO2, and Plasma [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>]

Values of CCO2, C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2, COCO2, and plasma [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>]. The plasma CCO2 (CCO2 pl) (mM) and plasma [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] (mM) were calculated from the standard formula derived from the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation (13, 21, 34, 38)
C<SC>co</SC><SUB>2 pl</SUB><IT>=</IT>P<SC>co</SC><SUB><IT>2</IT></SUB><IT>×s×</IT>[<IT>1+10</IT><SUP>(pH<IT>−</IT>p<IT>K′</IT>)</SUP>] (1)

Plasma [HCO<SUP><IT>−</IT></SUP><SUB><IT>3</IT></SUB>]<IT>=</IT>C<SC>co</SC><SUB>2 pl</SUB><IT>−</IT>P<SC>co</SC><SUB><IT>2</IT></SUB><IT>×s</IT> (2)
where s is the plasma solubility coefficient (in mM/Torr) of CO2 and pK' is the apparent dissociation constant of the CO2-HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> system. The variable s is 0.0307 in plasma at 37°C and pH 7.4 in normal human subjects (1). The variable pK' was calculated from Kelman's equation (13, 28), assuming the temperature was stable at 37°C during short-period exercise (51)
p<IT>K′=6.086+0.042×</IT>(<IT>7.4−</IT>pH)<IT>+0.00472</IT> (3)

<IT>+</IT>[<IT>0.00139×</IT>(<IT>7.4−</IT>pH)]
Total blood CCO2 (mM) was calculated from the equation of Douglas et al. (13), modified from Visser's equation (34) after taking into account the effects of changing pH during exercise on pK'
C<SC>co</SC><SUB><IT>2</IT></SUB><IT>=</IT>C<SC>co</SC><SUB>2 pl</SUB> (4)

<IT>×</IT><FENCE><IT>1−</IT><FR><NU><IT>0.0289×</IT>[Hb]</NU><DE>(<IT>3.352−0.456×</IT>S<SC>o</SC><SUB><IT>2</IT></SUB>)<IT>×</IT>(<IT>8.142−</IT>pH)</DE></FR></FENCE>
where [Hb] is Hb concentration.

Substituting CCO2 pl of Eq. 1 into Eq. 4, we obtained Eq. 5
C<SC>co</SC><SUB><IT>2</IT></SUB><IT>=s×</IT>P<SC>co</SC><SUB><IT>2</IT></SUB><IT>×</IT>[<IT>1+10</IT><SUP>(pH<IT>−</IT>p<IT>K′</IT>)</SUP>] (5)

<IT>×</IT><FENCE><IT>1−</IT><FR><NU><IT>0.0289×</IT>[Hb]</NU><DE>(<IT>3.352−0.456×</IT>S<SC>o</SC><SUB><IT>2</IT></SUB>)<IT>×</IT>(<IT>8.142−</IT>pH)</DE></FR></FENCE>
After CaCO2 and C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 were calculated (Eq. 5), the C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 and concurrent COCO2 were calculated, the latter by the Fick principle (16).

Default values of CCO2, C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2, and COCO2. To compare the magnitude of error caused by the failure to acknowledge changes in pH, Hb, and SO2 from rest to exercise on the PCO2-CCO2 relationship, default (Def) values of CCO2 were calculated by using the resting values of pH, Hb, and/or SO2 for each individual. Def values are so named because they do not acknowledge the changes in one or more of the independent variables during exercise. For example, if the changing PCO2, Hb, and SO2 values were used to calculate CCO2 during each minute of exercise but the pH remained at its resting (or Def) value, the CCO2 would be identified as Def-pH CCO2. In the same way, we calculated Def-Hb, Def-SO2, and the combined Def-pH, Hb and SO2, the latter when changes in all three values were not taken in to account. The percent errors of the Def values from the actual values of CaCO2, C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2, C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2, and COCO2 for each stage of exercise were calculated using the following formula: %error = 100 × (default - actual) divide  actual.

Relative importance of multiple factors on the PCO2-CCO2 relationship during exercise. Besides physically dissolved CO2 ([CO2]), which depends only on PCO2 under isothermic conditions, the two major factors influencing the PCO2-CCO2 relationship in the Douglas equation are the HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> factor (Fbic, i.e., the effect of pH on the quantity of [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] in both plasma and red blood cell) and the Hb factor (FHb, i.e., the effect of Hb binding to CO2). The FHb consists of three subfactors, the Hb concentration (FHbHb), the SO2 (FHbSO2), and the pH (FHbpH), on Hb binding of CO2. The formulas for the two major factors and the three subfactors are given in APPENDIX A. After calculation of actual values of each factor and subfactor using these equations, the relative importance of the changes in each factor and subfactor at each stage of exercise was calculated. Thus the influence of a specific factor or subfactor at any stage of exercise depends on how far its ratio differs from 1.00.

Estimation of Each Component of Blood CO2 During Exercise

The CO2 is transported as six components in human blood, [CO2], [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>], and carbamino concentration ([NH-CO2]) in both the plasma and the red blood cell. To compare the relative importance and change of each component of CO2 during exercise, we calculated each of these six components using the equations in APPENDIX B.

Data Analysis and Statistics

Unless otherwise specified, all data are expressed as means ± SD, with range values in parentheses. Data were analyzed predominantly by ANOVA; paired t-tests were used only when specified. The values of CCO2 calculated from Douglas' equation and APPENDIX B were compared by using linear regression and Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients. A P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

The subject's physical characteristics and aerobic parameters were as follows: age, 25 ± 5 (20-34) yr; height, 179 ± 3 (173) cm; body weight, 73 ± 5 (68-80) kg; work rate at LAT, 126 ± 25 (98-154) W; maximum work rate, 302 ± 47 (225-360) W; VO2 at LAT, 2.00 ± 0.31 (1.50-2.35) l/min; and maximal VO2, 3.91 ± 0.61 (2.74-4.31) l/min. From rest to Max, VO2 increased over 10-fold, from 0.37 ± 0.04 to 3.91 ± 0.61 l/min; VCO2 increased over 16-fold, from 0.29 ± 0.04 to 4.84 ± 0.71 l/min; heart rate increased nearly threefold, from 63 ± 6 to 178 ± 12 beats/min; whereas cardiac output increased over threefold, from 7.06 ± 2.37 to 25.38 ± 3.90 l/min. The rate of increase in VO2 as related to work rate increase was 10.03 ± 0.34 (9.50-10.68) ml · min-1 · W-1, similar to that previously reported (24, 25, 52).

Actual Changes in Blood CO2 Content

Both mixed venous and arterial Hb increased slightly but significantly above the LAT as Max was approached (P < 0.05 to P < 0.01) (Table 1). Mixed venous values for Hb are not shown because they differed minimally from arterial values (0.2 ± 0.3 g/dl). The mixed venous SO2 progressively decreased from rest to Max (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001), whereas arterial SO2 decreased slightly near Max (P < 0.05) (Table 1). Both mixed venous pH (pH<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>) (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001) and arterial pH (pHa) (P < 0.05) progressively decreased from rest to Max, with pH<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A> decreasing more than the pHa (P < 0.05 to P < 0.01 by paired t-test) (Fig. 1 and Table 1). P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 increases were marked, with progressively increasing values from rest to Max, particularly above the LAT (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001) (Fig. 1 and Table 1). PaCO2 increased slightly from rest (P < 0.05) to LAT, then stabilized, and then decreased moderately near Max (P < 0.01 vs. LAT; P < 0.05 vs. rest value) (Fig. 1). Thus mixed venous-arterial differences of O2 concentration, C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 (Fig. 1), SO2, pH, and PCO2 all progressively increased from rest to Max (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001) (Table 1).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Values of Hb, SO2, pH, and PCO2 in mixed venous and arterial blood and their differences at rest and during exercise



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   PCO2 (A), CO2 concentration (B), pH (C), and O2 concentration (D) in both mixed venous (solid symbols) and arterial (open symbols) blood as related to O2 uptake (VO2) normalized to the lactic acidosis threshold (@LAT) for 5 normal subjects. The first symbol on the left of each plot identifies the resting value, whereas the second symbol of each plot identifies the value at unloaded pedaling. Subsequent symbols from left to right are at approximately minute intervals during incre mental work to maximum (Max). The x-axis is normalized so that VO2@LAT = 1.0. The actual average VO2 at LAT is 2.0 with a range of 1.50-2.35 l/min. Note the widening differences between mixed venous and arterial values for all variables as work intensity increases. The differences become more marked above the LAT. The concentration of O2 was calculated from the following equation: concentration of O2 (mM) = (1.34 × Hb × SO2 + 0.00326 × PO2divide  2.226, where SO2 is oxyhemoglobin saturation (51). The decrease in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 during heavy exercise, despite the concurrent rise in P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2, is noteworthy. Values are means ± SE.

It is impressive how little change took place in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 from rest (23 mM) to Max (24 mM), despite large changes in P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 (47-78 Torr) (see Figs. 1 and 2 and Table 2). Initially, as exercise became more intense, C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 increased more than CaCO2. C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 then stabilized, whereas CaCO2 began to decrease (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) (Fig. 1). As exercise increased to maximum, the C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 decreased from its peak level (Table 2, at 5 min of incremental exercise) to slightly above its rest value in the case of C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 (P < 0.01) and below the rest value in the case of mixed venous [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] (Fig. 2B). In contrast, CaCO2 decreased to a much greater degree with little change in PaCO2. Thus the progressive increase in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 below LAT was due to an increasing C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2, whereas above LAT it was primarily due to a decreasing CaCO2 (Fig. 2).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   CO2 (CCO2; A) and plasma bicarbonate concentrations ([HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>]; B) as related to PCO2 at minute intervals in both mixed venous (solid symbols) and arterial (open symbols) blood in response to increasing work rate to Max. Arrows connect the corresponding arterial and mixed venous values at rest, LAT, and Max. Dotted lines, iso-pH values, assuming a Hb of 15 g/dl and a SO2 of 100%. A: from rest to LAT, C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 increased as P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 increased. Above LAT, C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 temporarily stabilized and then decreased, despite the increasing P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2. CaCO2 increased slightly as PaCO2 and H+ increased below the LAT. Above the LAT, CaCO2 sharply decreased because of a decrease in [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>], pH, and PaCO2. Mixed venous-arterial differences [C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2] progressively widened as exercise intensity increased (Table 2). Below the LAT, increases in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 were mainly due to the increases in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2; above LAT increases in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 were primarily due to decreases in CaCO2. B: the similarity of the patterns in the changes in plasma [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] indicates the dominance of HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> as the primary form of CO2 in the PCO2-CCO2 relationship during exercise.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Comparison of actual and default pH values on blood CO2 concentration during exercise

Influence of pH on the PCO2-CCO2 and PCO2-[HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] relationships during exercise. As shown in Fig. 2A and Table 2, the PCO2-CCO2 relationship was markedly influenced by pH changes during exercise. From rest to LAT, C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 increased relatively less than P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 because of a moderate decline in pH<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A> (P < 0.001). Transiently, above LAT, C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 stabilized, despite further increases in P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 due to the start of a fall in [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] reflected by the decrease in pH<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>. Eventually, despite the continuously increasing P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 (P < 0.001), C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 decreased at Max (P < 0.05, Max vs. LAT) due to the marked decrease in pH<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A> (P < 0.001, Max vs. LAT). Simultaneously, on the arterial blood side, CaCO2 increased insignificantly at work rates below LAT (P > 0.05), whereas PaCO2 increased (P < 0.05) and pHa decreased slightly (P < 0.05). Above LAT, CaCO2 and [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] decreased when lactic acid production increased, causing a significant decrease in pHa (P < 0.001) with only slight decreases in PaCO2 (Fig. 2).

As shown in Fig. 2B, the pattern of changes in plasma [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] was quite similar to the changes in CCO2 as a function of PCO2. This similarity reflects the dominant role of changes in pH and buffer base on the PCO2-CCO2 relationship. It is clear from Figs. 1 and 2 that an increase in PCO2 in venous blood does not necessarily predict an increase in HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> and therefore CCO2. Thus there is no single PCO2-CCO2 relationship that can be used to predict CCO2 from PCO2 during exercise.

Errors in Def CCO2 and COCO2 During Exercise

Table 2 shows the absolute values and percent errors of Def-pH CCO2 from actual CCO2 values. Errors in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2, CaCO2, and C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 increased consistently from actual values as exercise intensity increased, because changes in pH were not accounted for during exercise (P < 0.05 below LAT; P < 0.01 above LAT). Although errors in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 and CaCO2 were directionally the same, the absolute and percent errors of Def-pH C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 were always larger than those of Def-pH CaCO2 (P < 0.001 by paired t-test), resulting in consistent overestimation of Def-pH C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2. Although absolute errors of Def-pH C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 were always smaller than either those of Def-pH C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 or Def-pH CaCO2 (Table 2), the percent difference of Def-pH C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 was always larger than those of Def-pH C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 or Def-pH CaCO2 (Table 2; P < 0.001 by paired t-test). The overestimation of CaCO2, C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2, and C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 that results from failure to use pH in the calculation of CCO2 ranged from -0.2 to 27, 2 to 60, and 18 to 120%, respectively, even when correct, directly measured arterial and mixed venous PCO2, Hb, and SO2 are used in the calculation.

Figure 3 shows the percent errors of specific Def values of C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2, despite the use of correct measurements of PCO2, when no change during exercise is assumed in Hb, SO2, and/or pH. Defaulting changes in Hb during exercise results in trivial error (only -0.2 to 0.6%). Defaulting the change in SO2 results in slight underestimation in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 over the entire exercise period (-6 to -3%; P < 0.05). In contrast, defaulting changes in either pH alone or pH, Hb, and SO2 together cause large errors, i.e., a progressive overestimation in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 as exercise intensity increases, reaching ~50% at LAT and 100% at Max.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Errors in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 during exercise caused by ignoring changes in pH, Hb, and/or SO2 from resting values. Horizontal dotted line, actual value at each point calculated from measured mixed venous and arterial PCO2, pH, Hb, and SO2 at rest and during exercise, normalized to 0. Values are means ± SE. Each symbol indicates percent errors of C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 from the actual values caused by ignoring exercise-induced changes from rest in pH, Hb, and/or SO2 in mixed venous and arterial blood, despite correct values for P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 and PaCO2. Ignoring changes in pH or all 3 variables from rest causes overestimation of C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 exceeding 100% at Max. Ignoring changes in SO2 from rest causes underestimation of C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 by 3-6%. Ignoring changes in values of Hb causes trivial underestimation of C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2. VO2/VO2@LAT, ratio of VO2 to VO2@LAT.

As seen in Fig. 4, the percent errors in COCO2 that result from defaulting the influence of Hb, SO2, and/or pH on the PCO2-CCO2 relationship are always opposite to those on C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2. As with its effect on C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2, the change in Hb causes a trivial effect on COCO2 (only -0.6 to 0.2%), whereas the changes in SO2 cause the estimate of COCO2 to be 3-6% higher than actual (P < 0.05). In contrast, defaulting on either pH alone or pH, Hb, and SO2 together causes errors in COCO2 by >30% at LAT and >50% at Max.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Errors in cardiac output using CO2 (COCO2) during exercise caused by ignoring changes in pH, Hb, and/or SO2 from resting values. Horizontal dotted line, actual value calculated from measured mixed venous and arterial PCO2, pH, Hb, and SO2 at rest and during exercise and CO2 production, normalized to 0. Values are means ± SE. Each symbol indicates percent errors of COCO2 from the actual values caused by ignoring exercise-induced changes in pH, Hb, and/or SO2 in mixed venous and arterial blood, despite correct values for P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 and PaCO2. Ignoring changes in all 3 variables or pH alone from rest causes underestimation of COCO2 exceeding 50% at Max. Ignoring changes in SO2 from rest causes overestimation of COCO2 by 3-6%. Ignoring changes in Hb from rest causes trivial overestimation of COCO2.

Relative importance of multiple factors on the PCO2-CCO2 relationship during exercise. The influence of each of several factors on the PCO2-CCO2 relationship is shown in Table 3, with factor influence increasing as its value deviates from 1.0. Thus the deviations during exercise of Fbic (which are due to pH changes) far exceed those of FHb, both in mixed venous and arterial blood, during exercise (Table 3). Considering the subfactors of FHb, the deviations during exercise of FHbpH (due to the effect of pH changes on [NH-CO2]) exceed those of FHbSO2 and FHbHb, both in mixed venous and arterial blood. Thus the changes and influence of pH (Fbic and FHbpH) are quantitatively much more important in blood CO2 transport during exercise, both in mixed venous and arterial blood, than are the changes and influences of change in Hb and SO2. These findings contrast importantly with the conclusions of McHardy (34).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Factors describing the magnitude by which Hb, SO2, or pH changes affect the PCO2-CCO2 relationship during exercise

Changes in Blood Components of CCO2 During Exercise

The total CCO2 and each of its fractional components in mixed venous and arterial blood and the mixed venoarterial differences at rest and during exercise are shown in Fig. 5 and Table 4. These data were calculated from the equations described in APPENDIX B. Both C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 and CaCO2 correlated well with the same variables calculated from the Douglas equation (r = 0.9998, P < 0.0001), with only very small deviations (-0.06 ± 0.14 mM) at rest and during exercise.


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Changes in CCO2 at 5 levels of exercise (rest, mild, moderate, heavy, and very heavy). In each group of 3 bars, left bar shows the total mixed venous (<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>) CCO2, middle bar is arterial (a) CCO2, and right bar is mixed venous-arterial (<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>-a) CCO2 difference. Each bar is divided into the [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>], carbamino concentration ([NH-CO2]), and physically dissolved CO2 concentration ([CO2]) components for whole blood. During exercise, changes in [CO2] (PCO2 dependent) and [NH-CO2] (PCO2, pH, Hb, and SO2 dependent) fractions are dwarfed by the changes in [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] (both PCO2 and pH dependent). Ex-2 and Ex-7, 2 and 7 min of incremental exercise, respectively.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4.   Plasma and red blood cell CO2 concentrations (mM) per liter of blood at rest, LAT, and maximal exercise

In Fig. 5, both mixed venous [CO2] and [NH-CO2] increased progressively from rest to Max (P < 0.05). Smaller percent but larger absolute changes in [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] dwarfed the impact of the larger percent but smaller absolute changes in mixed venous [CO2] and [NH-CO2]. Below LAT, trends in change in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 were similar to those in [CO2] or [NH-CO2], but they differed markedly above LAT. The arterial [CO2] and [NH-CO2] increased only slightly from rest at LAT (P < 0.05) and then returned to near resting values at the highest work rate. In contrast to the relatively stable arterial [CO2] and [NH-CO2], large declines in arterial [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] above the LAT caused marked decreases in CaCO2. Thus changes in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 and CaCO2 conformed mainly to changes in [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] with changes in [CO2] and [NH-CO2] having a relatively small effect.

Referring to Table 4 (selected exercise intensities), ratios of CCO2 to [CO2] (CCO2/[CO2]) were calculated by dividing the CCO2 by the sum of plasma and red blood cell components of [CO2]. Note that the CCO2/[CO2] for mixed venous blood progressively decreased as the exercise intensity increased (P < 0.05), especially above LAT (P < 0.01). The CCO2/[CO2] in arterial blood, which did not change significantly below LAT (P > 0.05), progressively decreased at and above LAT (P < 0.05), because of the reduction in [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>]. Thus CCO2/[CO2] is not constant but depends on the source of blood and the intensity of exercise.

It is also evident from Table 4 and Fig. 5 that plasma and red blood cell [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] together comprise ~85% (mixed venous) and 90% (arterial) of the CCO2 at rest and during exercise. Even though the absolute values of mixed venous [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] are always greater than those of the arterial [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>], the mixed venous [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>]/CCO2 are always lower than the arterial [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>]/CCO2 (P < 0.001) because of the greater amount of [CO2].

Relative contributions of the three forms of CO2-to-CO2 exchange are shown for each level of exercise in Table 5. From rest to Max, [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] exchange remained large and quite constant at ~76-77% of total CO2 excreted, i.e., C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2. In contrast, [CO2] and [NH-CO2] accounted for ~9 and 14%, respectively, of total CO2 excreted at rest. Above LAT, the relative contribution to CO2 output of [CO2] progressively increased to 13% (P < 0.05) and that of [NH-CO2] decreased to ~10% (P < 0.01).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5.   Relative contribution to the CO2 exchange

Finally, to support the validity of our calculated values for CaCO2, C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2, and C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 at all levels of exercise, we compared the COCO2 measured by the Fick principle with COO2 at rest and each level of exercise for the five subjects in this study (Table 6). At each level but Max, the mean values are in good agreement. As noted in Table 6, in other quite similar exercise studies (51), the COCO2 was insignificantly different from COO2 at peak and all other levels of exercise.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6.   Comparison of cardiac output by Fick method using CO2 or O2 at rest and different levels of exercise


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES

Major Findings

This study discloses several important findings. 1) During exercise, CCO2 and [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] do not consistently increase in proportion to PCO2. 2) Because of the acidemia caused by increased lactate production, C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 and mixed venous [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] decrease to near resting values as maximal VO2 is approached, despite increasing P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2. 3) Above LAT, while P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 increases to high levels, PaCO2 decreases because of ventilatory compensation for the exercise lactic acidosis; consequently, CaCO2 decreases to a greater degree than does C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2. 4) The increase in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 during exercise is mainly due to the increase in C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 below LAT and the decrease in CaCO2 above LAT. 5) Changes in SO2 and Hb have minor influences on the PCO2-CCO2 relationship during exercise, whereas changes in pH due to changes in buffer base have a major influence. 6) Because pH<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A> decreases more than pHa, there are large errors in calculated C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 when the pH change is ignored. 7) At rest and during all levels of exercise, over threefourths of the total CO2 exchange from the blood to lung gas (i.e., C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2) is due to dissociation of [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>], whereas less than one-fourth is due to the combination of venoarterial differences in [CO2] and [NH-CO2] at rest to Max.

The Dominant Role of pH in the PCO2-CCO2 Relationship During Exercise

As evidenced by VCO2 measurements during exercise, the lung progressively increases the excretion of CO2 as work rate increases. Because cardiac output increases much less than VCO2, the difference between C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 and CaCO2 necessarily widens. Figures 1 and 2 depict the progressive increase in the differences among C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2, CaCO2, [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>], PCO2, and pH as work rate increases. The metabolic acidosis found in our subjects during high-intensity exercise causes plasma and red blood cell CCO2 and [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] to decrease in both mixed venous and arterial blood, but especially in arterial blood.

As commonly graphed, the PCO2-CCO2 relationship is depicted as nearly linear between PCO2 values of ~30-80 Torr and CCO2 values of ~12-28 mM but without reference to or depiction of the effect of a pH change (8, 38, 56). Changes in CCO2 are sometimes fractionated into plasma and red blood cell components, and the differences between mixed venous and arterial blood due to Hb and SO2 are also considered, again with exclusion of the effect of pH (8, 38, 56). However, as seen in Figs. 1 and 2A and Tables 1 and 2, widely divergent P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 values (47-78 Torr) may occur with reasonably similar C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 values (22.8-23.9 mM). This is due to relatively large decreases in the buffer base reflected in the change in pH<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A> (7.362-7.130) (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Furthermore, reasonably similar PaCO2 values (41-38 Torr) may pair with widely different CaCO2 values (20.9-15.2 mM) because of relatively large differences in pH. Thus when the C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 is calculated from P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2, the change in blood pH<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A> during exercise must not be ignored. During heavy exercise, CCO2 is not linearly related to the PCO2 in either arterial or mixed venous blood (see Fig. 2A). In fact, PCO2 and CCO2 change in opposite directions in mixed venous blood as metabolic acid is added to the blood by the muscles. In contrast to original reports and textbooks (8, 38, 56), Fig. 2 shows that C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 does not increase as a function of P<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 during exercise above the LAT.

We suggest that the addition of pH (or [H+]) isopleths to diagrams depicting the plasma [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>]-PCO2 and CCO2-PCO2 relationships, such as shown in Fig. 2, conveys necessary and important information that is lacking in the present standard depictions of these relationships (8, 38, 56). Such isopleths clarify and reinforce the importance of the acid-base changes that can occur during exercise.

Total blood [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>] comprises ~85% (mixed venous) or 90% (arterial) of the CCO2 (Table 4). Although the percent changes in mixed venous [CO2] and [NH-CO2] are appreciable (Tables 4 and 5 and Fig. 5), their impact is dwarfed by the magnitude of the large absolute changes in [HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>]. Additionally, Tables 2 and 3 and Fig. 3, which give Def values and factor ratios, analyze the relative importance of the components of CCO2 in the Douglas equation and confirm the dominance of pH factors. In Table 3 and Fig. 3, it is shown that the pH change factor (Fbic from 1.00 at rest to 0.59 at Max) dominates over other factors. Within the red blood cell, the pH factor even dominates over the change in Hb concentration and SO2 factors (Table 3). Thus making adjustments for the influences of Hb and SO2 while ignoring pH to calculate C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 or CaCO2 during exercise, as was done earlier (34), results in major errors.

Relevance of the CCO2-PCO2 Relationship to the Accuracy and Precision of Estimation of C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 and COCO2

Our calculations of CCO2 come from direct measurements of mixed venous and arterial PCO2, pH, Hb, and SO2. As previously shown, the relationship between PCO2 and CCO2 is positively correlated between rest and LAT but then becomes negatively correlated as increasing metabolic acidosis develops. Thus a given PCO2 value can be associated with widely divergent CCO2 values.

It would be convenient if errors in measurement of C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 and CaCO2 were to be offset in the calculation of C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2, but this is not the case. It is evident from Table 2 that omitting the change in pH in calculating C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 causes a much larger error than when C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2 and CaCO2 are calculated individually. Figure 4 shows that, when these erroneous measurements are applied to calculate cardiac output, errors of large magnitude result. In contrast, ignoring the changes in [Hb] and SO2 during exercise results in relatively unimportant errors compared with ignoring changes in pH.

Possible Measurement and Calculation Errors in Our Data

The gas exchange, rate of increase in VO2 as related to work rate increase, and mixed venous and arterial blood values are unlikely to be significantly inaccurate or imprecise in this study, considering the similarity of these values to those of other studies in normal men and the quality control procedures used in our laboratory (3, 4, 21, 24, 25, 46-55). A limitation of this study is the absence of direct measurements of CaCO2 and C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2. Because all methods for such measurements require a minimum of 30 min for each blood sample, it was unrealistic to obtain the many measurements needed on so many samples (~24-28) for each study. However, the similar values obtained for COO2 and COCO2 at rest and all levels of exercise (Table 6) give credence to the reliability of the concurrent measurements of pH and PCO2 and calculated mixed venous and arterial concentrations of CO2 and O2 at all levels of exercise.

We did not measure blood or body temperatures during exercise. From other studies using a similar exercise protocol, we estimated that the temperature increase from rest to peak exercise would be 0.2-0.8°C (51). We calculated that a temperature rise of 0.5°C during exercise would affect the values of CaCO2, C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2, and C<A><AC>v</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>CO2-CaCO2 by <1% at peak exercise (51). Therefore, this small temperature change would not significantly alter our findings.

Considering the diversity of sources and complexity of equations in APPENDIX B that were used to calculate the six components of CCO2, the sum values for each blood sample from the six sources agree remarkably well with those calculated from the simpler Douglas equation. The CCO2 values calculated from the Douglas equation have excellent linear correlation with the total sum values at all levels of CCO2 for both arterial and mixed venous blood (r = 0.9998, Table 4).

Possible Errors Due to a Disequilibria of pH and CO2

There is no evidence that an alveolar-arterial CO2 disequilibrium occurs, except under conditions of high levels of carbonic anhydrase inhibition. The latter is a model of CO2 disequilibrium. In contrast, there are good arguments using physiological data against disequilibrium for CO2 at high work rates as follows.

1) End-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) exceeds PaCO2 during exercise with a maintained negative PaCO2-PETCO2 differnce of ~4 Torr, despite the increase in VCO2 to very high levels (54). If there were a disequilibrium, PaCO2-PETCO2 difference and PaCO2 should increase relative to PETCO2 as VCO2 increases. However, the change in PETCO2 parallels the change in PaCO2 as VCO2 increases to maximum and remains above it (54).

2) If there were a disequilibrium, calculated dead space volume/tidal volume should increase as work rate increases, because PaCO2 would be increased relative to PETCO2. This happens when a right-to-left shunt opens during exercise but does not happen normally. Dead space volume/tidal volume decreases with exercise and remains decreased to similar levels or decreases further as work rate increases to the maximum in normal subjects.

3) If there were a disequilibrium, VCO2 would not increase appropriately as high-metabolic rates are achieved and PaCO2 would increase. Increasing VCO2 keeps pace with increasing VO2 even for very fit men and exceeds VO2 once lactic acidos