Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 90: 1691-1699, 2001;
8750-7587/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luo, Y. M.
Right arrow Articles by Moxham, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luo, Y. M.
Right arrow Articles by Moxham, J.
Vol. 90, Issue 5, 1691-1699, May 2001

Effect of diaphragm fatigue on neural respiratory drive

Y. M. Luo1, N. Hart2, N. Mustfa1, R. A. Lyall1, M. I. Polkey2, and J. Moxham1

1 Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9PJ; and 2 Respiratory Muscle Laboratory, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP, United Kingdom


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

To test the hypothesis that diaphragm fatigue leads to an increase in neural respiratory drive, we measured the esophageal diaphragm electromyogram (EMG) during CO2 rebreathing before and after diaphragm fatigue in six normal subjects. The electrode catheter was positioned on the basis of the amplitude and polarity of the diaphragm compound muscle action potential recorded simultaneously from four pairs of electrodes during bilateral anterior magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (BAMPS) at functional residual capacity. Two minutes of maximum isocapnic voluntary ventilation (MIVV) were performed in six subjects to induce diaphragm fatigue. A maximal voluntary breathing against an inspiratory resistive loading (IRL) was also performed in four subjects. The reduction of transdiaphragmatic pressure elicited by BAMPS was 22% (range 13-27%) after 2 min of MIVV and was similar, 20% (range 13-26%), after IRL. There was a linear relationship between minute ventilation (VE) and the root mean square (RMS) of the EMG during CO2 rebreathing before and after fatigue. The mean slope of the linear regression of RMS on VE was similar before and after diaphragm fatigue: 2.80 ± 1.31 vs. 3.29 ± 1.40 for MIVV and 1.51 ± 0.31 vs 1.55 ± 0.31 for IRL, respectively. We conclude that the esophageal diaphragm EMG can be used to assess neural drive and that diaphragm fatigue of the intensity observed in this study does not affect respiratory drive.

electromyogram; carbon dioxide; phrenic stimulation


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

IT HAS BEEN ASSUMED THAT RESPIRATORY drive to the diaphragm increases to sustain appropriate ventilation when the diaphragm is fatigued (26, 27). It has been difficult to test this hypothesis because of the lack of reliable methods to assess neural respiratory drive. The diaphragm electromyogram (EMG) during spontaneous breathing recorded from an esophageal electrode has been used to investigate neural respiratory drive (18, 19). However, this technique was questioned after the assertion that the amplitude of the diaphragm compound muscle action potential (CMAP) changes with change in lung volume as a result of substantial movement of the electrode, up to 8 cm during deep breathing (11).

In a previous study (20), our laboratory demonstrated that the diaphragm crus is relatively stable and that the diaphragm CMAP is independent of changes in lung volume and can be accurately recorded by positioning the esophageal electrode at the centre of the electrically active region of the diaphragm (EARdi) (21). Recently, Beck et al. (2) demonstrated that the root mean square (RMS) of the voluntary diaphragm EMG recorded from a multipair esophageal electrode is not artifactually influenced by change in lung volume. These studies suggest that the esophageal diaphragm EMG may be useful to assess neural respiratory drive.

The effect of diaphragm fatigue on neural respiratory drive has been assessed by the ventilatory response to CO2 (23, 37). However, contradictory results have been reported. For example, Yan and co-workers (37) showed no alteration in the ventilatory response to CO2 after inspiratory muscle fatigue, whereas Mador and Tobin (23) reported that the slope of the ventilatory response to CO2 was significantly decreased by inspiratory muscle fatigue. Nevertheless, the effect of diaphragm fatigue on neural drive assessed by the esophageal diaphragm EMG has not been reported. Moxham and co-workers (27) showed that neural drive to the sternomastoid muscle was increased to sustain the required force when low-frequency fatigue occurred in this muscle. We hypothesized that diaphragm fatigue may increase neural drive to the diaphragm. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effect of diaphragm fatigue on neural drive by recording the diaphragm EMG during CO2 rebreathing before and after maximal isocapnic voluntary ventilation (MIVV) and inspiratory resistive loading (IRL).


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Subjects. Six healthy volunteers (4 men and 2 women) aged 26-37 yr (mean age 32 yr) participated in the study. All subjects had experience of performing MIVV, and most were staff of the respiratory muscle laboratory. The study was approved by the ethics committee of King's College Hospital, and all subjects gave their informed consent.

Bilateral anterior magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves. Bilateral anterior magnetic stimulation (BAMPS) was performed by using two 43-mm figure-eight coils powered by Magstim 200 stimulators (Whitland, Dyfed, UK). The coils were placed anterolaterally on each side of the neck over the phrenic nerves (20). One hundred percent of maximal magnetic stimulator output was applied throughout the study except at the stage of positioning the esophageal electrode, when 80% of maximal output was used. Phrenic nerve stimulation was performed at functional residual capacity (FRC) with the subject seated upright in a chair.

Esophageal electrode and its positioning. We used a multipair esophageal electrode catheter with the same configuration as previously reported (20). In brief, the electrode catheter consisted of seven copper coils (coil 1 being proximal and coil 7 distal) that were positioned close to the esophageal hiatus. Four electrode pairs were created from the seven coils with an interelectrode distance of 3 cm within a recording pair. Pair 1 consisted of electrodes 1 and 3, pair 2 of electrodes 2 and 4, pair 3 of electrodes 3 and 5, and pair 4 of electrodes 5 and 7. Electrode 6 was connected to ground. The esophageal electrode was passed through the nose and swallowed into the esophagus. Electrode 3 was positioned at the center of the EARdi at FRC on the basis of the amplitude and polarity of the diaphragm CMAP recorded from the four pairs of electrodes during BAMPS (20). The ideal position of the electrode was characterized by a large CMAP amplitude from pairs 1 and 3, with opposite polarity, and a small CMAP recorded from electrode pairs 2 and 4. The small or absent CMAP recorded from electrode pair 2 is due to cancellation of the potential when both recording electrodes are equally close to the source of potential (20); the small CMAP recorded from electrode pair 4 is because it is 3 cm away from the crus of the diaphragm. After the ideal positioning of the electrode was achieved, the catheter was securely taped at the nose. The diaphragm EMG signals were amplified and band-pass filtered between 40 Hz and 1 kHz (Magstim).

MIVV. Diaphragm fatigue was induced by 2 min of MIVV as previously described (28). The subject inhaled from a 6- liter anesthetic bag that was kept inflated by delivering medical air (21% O2-79% N2) and 100% O2 from cylinders. We also added CO2 to the bag to maintain the end-tidal Pco2 at 5 kPa.

CO2 rebreathing CO2 rebreathing was performed by using a method similar to that described by Read (31) except the baseline gas composition was 5% CO2-95% O2 (7). Subjects were studied in the seated posture and initially breathed room air through a mouthpiece connected to an open breathing circuit for a few minutes. When subjects were familiar with breathing with a mouthpiece, the rebreathing bag with 5% CO2 was introduced. CO2 rebreathing was terminated when the end-tidal CO2 concentration was ~9%.

Signal recordings. End-tidal CO2 was monitored by a capnograph (model 455, P. K. Morgan, Kent, UK). Flow was measured with a pneumotachograph (Fleisch no. 4, Lausanne, Switzerland) connected to a Mercury CS6 electrospirometer (G. M. Engineering, Kilwinning, Scotland, UK). Esophageal pressure (Pes) and gastric pressure (Pga) were recorded by using commercially available balloon catheters. The balloons was positioned in the conventional manner, and pressures were measured by differential pressure transducers (model MP45, Validyne, Northridge, CA). Pdi was calculated by digital subtraction of Pes from Pga. The Pdi elicited by BAMPS at FRC with the airway closed was termed twitch Pdi. The Pdi obtained during maximum sniff maneuvers was also recorded and was termed sniff Pdi. Pdi was measured in all subjects but one (subject 4) who had nasal obstruction, which prevented the positioning of the balloon catheters.

The spontaneous diaphragm EMG recorded from the four esophageal electrode pairs, Pes, Pga, respiratory flow, and end-tidal CO2 were recorded simultaneously using PowerLab 8s hardware and software (ADInstruments, Castle Hill, Australia) combined with a Power Mac computer. The sample rate was 2 kHz for EMG signals and 200 Hz for all other signals. Signals were displayed in real time and stored in the computer hard disk for further off-line analysis.

Protocol. CO2 rebreathing was done 15 min before and 15 min after MIVV. Twitch Pdi and sniff Pdi were measured immediately before and 10 min after MIVV to avoid twitch potentiation and assess diaphragm fatigue. Five twitches and five to seven sniffs were performed on each occasion.

Additional study: diaphragm fatigue induced by IRL. To observe whether IRL caused more severe diaphragm fatigue, and possibly a greater effect on neural drive, four subjects were asked to inspire through an inspiratory resistance. No load was added during expiration. Subjects were asked to achieve maximal voluntary Pdi and to maintain this pressure as a square wave throughout inspiration with a duty cycle of 0.66. Subjects were vigorously encouraged to make a maximal effort, with each breath, for 5 min. To seek to achieve substantial fatigue, three consecutive inspiratory loading runs were performed. A 10-min rest period was allowed between runs. Twitch Pdi was measured before the first run and 10 min after the last run to document diaphragm fatigue. CO2 rebreathing was performed before the first run and 15 min after the third run to assess the effect of such severe inspiratory loading on the relationship between RMS and ventilation.

Data analysis. Data were analyzed off-line. The RMS with a time constant of 100 ms was calculated by computer. The peak RMS of inspiration cycles was measured, and the mean of five consecutive breathing cycles was calculated. To avoid the influence of the electrocardiogram on the diaphragm EMG, RMS was measured from the segments between QRS complexes. Minute ventilation (VE) and tidal volume (VT) were calculated by integrating flow from five consecutive breaths. Twitch Pdi was the average of the three to five twitches. Diaphragm fatigue was defined as a reduction of twitch Pdi >10% after MIVV or IRL, as suggested by Mador and co-workers (22). The difference in sniff Pdi before and after MIVV was assessed by a paired t-test. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to assess the difference in the reduction of Pdi between MIVV and IRL groups. The relationship between ventilation (VE and VT) and RMS was assessed by correlation. An F-test was performed to assess the difference in slopes of the two regression lines. Unless otherwise stated, the RMS reported was from the electrode pair with largest EMG amplitude at the beginning of CO2 rebreathing.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Spontaneous EMG amplitude. The electrode pair that recorded the greatest amplitude CMAP at FRC was usually the same as that recording the largest amplitude spontaneous EMG during resting breathing and CO2 rebreathing (Fig. 1). The electrode pair that recorded the maximal EMG during resting breathing was the same as at the end of CO2 rebreathing except in one subject in whom the electrode pair that recorded the maximal EMG changed from pair 1 to pair 2. Electrode pair 4 always recorded the smallest EMG during CO2 rebreathing (Fig. 1), even at the end of CO2 rebreathing when VT was 3.0 liters.


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Left: esophageal electrode configuration. The esophageal electrode catheter consists of 7 coils that form 4 recording electrode pairs. Each electrode is 1 cm in length, and there is a 1-cm gap between electrodes. The interelectrode distance within an electrode pair is 3 cm. Electrode 3 is accurately positioned at the center of the diaphragm electrical activity region (EARdi) on the basis of the diaphragm compound muscle action potential recorded from 4 pairs of electrodes during bilateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation at functional residual capacity (20). + and -, Polarity of amplifier inputs. Right: 4 pairs of electrodes simultaneously recording the spontaneous electromyogram (EMG). EMG amplitude increases with increasing tidal volume. Pair 2 records a smaller EMG than pair 1 and 3 during spontaneous breathing. Pair 4 always only records the smallest EMG during CO2 rebreathing, even at the end of CO2 rebreathing when tidal volume was 3.0 liters, indicating that the diaphragm EARdi center does not significantly move during spontaneous breathing.

Relationship between ventilation and RMS. RMS increased with increasing VT and VE. There was a linear relationship between RMS and ventilation for all pairs of electrodes, including pairs 2 and 4, although these only recorded a small EMG signal (Fig. 2). This relationship did not change after 2 min of MIVV (Table 1).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   A: there is good correlation between minute ventilation and root mean square (RMS) of the EMG recorded from the 4 electrode pairs; the correlation coefficients are 0.98 for pair 1, 0.89 for pair 2, 0.98 for pair 3, and 0.88 for pair 4. B: there is also good correlation between tidal volume and RMS of the EMG; the correlation coefficients are 0.99 for pair 1, 0.91 for pair 2, 0.99 for pair 3, and 0.90 for pair 4. RMS recorded from electrode pairs 1 and 3 is almost the same and increases with increasing minute ventilation or tidal volume. RMS recorded from pairs 1 and 3 was always larger than that from pairs 2 and 4, and electrode pair 4 only recorded a small EMG throughout CO2 rebreathing even when the tidal volume is over 3.0 liters. Data are from 1 subject.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Twitch Pdi, sniff Pdi, R between RMS of EMG and VE and VT, and slope of regression of RMS on VE and VT before and after MIVV

Diaphragm fatigue induced by MIVV. The mean twitch Pdi was reduced by 22 ± 3% after 2 min of MIVV. The reduction of twitch Pdi was >10% in all subjects. Sniff Pdi changed little (Table 1).

Linear regression analysis of RMS, VE, and VT. Figure 3 shows a typical example of the relationship between RMS and ventilation before and after MIVV. The mean slopes of linear regression of RMS on VE or VT were not significantly different before and after MIVV (P > 0.05) (Table 1).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Slopes of linear regression of RMS of the EMG and ventilation before (pre) and after (post) diaphragm fatigue induced by 2 min of maximum isocapnic voluntary ventilation (MIVV) are similar (P > 0.05). A: RMS and minute ventilation. B: RMS and tidal volume. Data are from 1 subject.

Additional study: diaphragm fatigue induced by IRL. After 30-40 s of maximal voluntary inspiratory resistive breathing, Pdi and voluntary diaphragm EMG were reduced, although the subjects continued to attempt to achieve maximal inspiration (Fig. 4). The mean maximal reduction of EMG was 30% (range 12-54%). All subjects were exhausted after three consecutive loaded runs. Mean twitch Pdi was 31 and 25 cmH2O before and after loading, respectively. In all subjects, the reduction of twitch Pdi was >10% after loading, indicating diaphragm fatigue. There was a good correlation between VE and the RMS. The correlation coefficients were 0.96 ± 0.02 before and 0.98 ± 0.01 after loaded breathing. The slope of the regression of RMS on VE was similar before and after IRL breathing (Fig. 5, Table 2).


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   EMG recorded from 4 pairs of electrodes during maximal inspiratory resistive loading. A large amplitude EMG was recorded from pairs 1 and 3. Pair 2 recorded a slightly smaller EMG than pairs 1 and 3. Pair 4 only recorded a small EMG. Left: at the beginning of maximal inspiratory resistive loading. Right: 1 min after maximal loading; maximal transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) is reduced, and the amplitude of EMG recorded from all 4 pairs of the electrode is also reduced. The simultaneous reduction of EMG and Pdi suggests that the reduction of diaphragmatic contractility during maximal loading could be due to reduction of neural drive to the diaphragm.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   A: slopes of linear regression of RMS of EMG and ventilation. The 2 slopes are similar and were 1.13 before and 0.92 after fatigue induced by 3 runs of inspiratory resistive loading (IRL). B: slopes of linear regression of RMS and tidal volume. The 2 slopes are also similar and were 38.2 before and 37.9 after fatigue. Data are from 1 subject.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Twitch Pdi, R between RMS of EMG and VE and slope of regression of RMS on VE before and after 3 runs of maximal inspiratory resistive loading


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In the present study, we found a linear relationship between ventilation and RMS of the diaphragm EMG. This linear relationship was not changed by diaphragm fatigue. Our results do not support our original hypothesis.

Electrode movement. It is important to consider the extent of possible electrode movement relative to the crus of the diaphragm during spontaneous breathing. The esophageal electrode catheter was fixed securely at the nose. Therefore, any movement of the electrode relative to the crus would be due to movement of the diaphragm. It has been observed that the dome of the diaphragm can move 1-2 cm in normal resting breathing and up to 8-10 cm when breathing from residual volume to total lung capacity. Data on the movement of the crus in humans are much more difficult to obtain. The recommendation has been to use a balloon-stabilized esophageal catheter to allow the electrode to track the crus of the diaphragm and to fix the distance of the electrode from the diaphragm (12). Gandevia and McKenzie (11) reported that a balloon-stabilized electrode catheter could move up to 8 cm during deep breathing on the basis of fluoroscopic observations. Subsequently, electrode movement was considered a major cause of artifact and unreliability when the diaphragm EMG was recorded with an esophageal electrode. However, the movement of the balloon-stabilized electrode may be more related to movement of the dome than the crus. Indeed, Gandevia and McKenzie further reported that electrode movement was directly proportional to the vertical displacement of the diaphragmatic dome. Similarly, Daubenspeck et al. (6) observed that the movement of the esophageal electrode was proportional to the movement of the diaphragm, on the basis of fluoroscopy. Beck et al. (3) judged the crus of the diaphragm to move less than 4 cm with respect to the electrode, on the basis of the change of the optimal electrode pair for recording the diaphragm EMG. The small movement of the electrode shown by Beck and co-workers was explained by the suggestion that the electrode catheter moved with the diaphragm because it was firmly gripped by the esophagus, as first suggested by Schweitzer et al. (32). We recently demonstrated that the position of the crus of the diaphragm was relatively stable when lung volume changed from residual volume to FRC plus 2.0 liters (20). In the present study, we found that the electrode pair that recorded the maximal amplitude of the EMG when VT was <1 liter was usually the same as at the end of CO2 rebreathing when the VT was >= 3 liters. If the position of the crus changes with lung volume, the optimal electrode pair for recording the maximal EMG will also change. For example, the EMG recorded by electrode pair 1 will become smaller and the EMG recorded by pair 4, which is 3 cm away from the diaphragm, will become larger as VT increases. That this was not the case suggests that the crus of the diaphragm did not move beyond the span of one recording electrode pair. Furthermore, the EMG recorded from pair 2 commonly remained smaller than that from pair 1 and pair 3, suggesting the level of the EARdi center did not change with respect to the esophageal electrode. These results are similar to our laboratory's previous study (20) and further support the view that the crus of the diaphragm is relatively stable. The difference in results between our study and that of Beck et al. (3) may be due to the different electrode configuration, in particular the positioning of the electrodes. We positioned the catheter on the basis of the CMAP produced by BAMPS at FRC, whereas the positioning by Beck and colleagues was determined by a cross-correlation method using signals from the multipair electrode (3).

Diaphragm fatigue with MIVV. It is important to be confident that significant diaphragm fatigue was present when the effect of fatigue on ventilation was assessed. In the present study, the reduction of twitch Pdi was >10% in all subjects, indicating diaphragm fatigue had been induced according to the criteria suggested by Mador and co-workers (22). Previous studies have shown that 2 min of MIVV cause diaphragm fatigue, as indicated by a reduction of twitch Pdi (8, 13). For example, Hamnegard and co-workers (13) showed that the mean twitch Pdi, elicited by cervical magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves, was reduced by 23% after MIVV, with a range of 11-40%, which was similar to the reduction of twitch Pdi in the present study. The reduced twitch Pdi signifies low-frequency fatigue, which can last for many hours (16).

Neural drive assessed by diaphragm EMG. The esophageal diaphragm EMG has previously been used to assess neural respiratory drive (18). However, the method was criticized after it was found that lung volume could have a significant influence on the diaphragm EMG recorded from balloon-stabilized electrodes (11, 34). As already discussed, our laboratory has shown that a relatively stable CMAP, little affected by lung volume, can be recorded when the esophageal electrode is accurately positioned at the level of the diaphragm (20). Animal studies have also shown that there is little effect of lung volume on diaphragm CMAP (12, 15). In humans, Beck et al. (2) have found a good relationship between diaphragm contractility and RMS recorded from a multipair esophageal electrode. In keeping with the results of previous work (18, 30), in the present study we found a good relationship between RMS and ventilation during CO2 rebreathing. These results suggest that, when carefully positioned, the esophageal electrode is useful for recording the spontaneous diaphragm EMG.

Neural respiratory drive before and after diaphragm fatigue. There is a good correlation between the RMS of the diaphragm EMG, an index of drive, and ventilation (18). Therefore, the effect of diaphragm fatigue on neural drive may be reflected by ventilation. Although respiratory muscle fatigue has been assumed to be a cause of ventilatory failure, the available data are contradictory. Aubier et al. (1) and Hussain et al. (14) showed respiratory muscle fatigue and ventilatory failure in animal models of shock, whereas Nava and Bellemare (29), studying shock in dogs, found no evidence of diaphragm fatigue. In fact, overt respiratory muscle fatigue in clinical settings is relatively uncommon (10). It has been suggested that diaphragm fatigue can contribute to weaning failure, on the basis of the observation of a decrease in the high-to-low ratio of the EMG power spectrum in patients during unsuccessful weaning attempts (5). However, this may be unreliable because EMG spectral analysis is not a specific method to diagnose diaphragm fatigue (33). Consistent with these findings, a study of infant monkeys (36) showed that ventilatory failure as a result of inspiratory resistive loading was not associated with inspiratory muscle fatigue. Additionally, Elliot et al. (9) failed to find any relationship between the improvement in arterial PCO2 and an increase in inspiratory muscle strength in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease successfully treated with noninvasive ventilation. More recently, Laghi and colleagues (17) showed that most patients in the intensive care unit undergoing a weaning trial did not develop diaphragm fatigue, on the basis of twitch Pdi, whether the trial was a success or failure. These observations suggest that respiratory muscle fatigue may not, in some circumstances, be clinically important and may not affect ventilation. A number of studies in normal subjects have shown that diaphragm fatigue does not affect ventilation. Our laboratory has shown that in normal subjects MIVV was the same before and after fatigue (8). Yan et al. (37) demonstrated that diaphragm fatigue did not reduce ventilation and that the ventilatory response to CO2 was not altered by diaphragm fatigue, although they did not record the diaphragm EMG. Mador and Tobin (23) showed that the ventilatory response to CO2 rebreathing 5 and 40 min after fatigue did not significantly differ from that before fatigue. These studies are consistent with the findings of the present study that fatigue does not alter neural drive.

The failure of respiratory muscle fatigue to reduce ventilation suggests that, even with high levels of ventilation, there is sufficient reserve of ventilatory muscle capacity to compensate. Such compensation would require an increase in motoneuron firing frequency or recruitment of additional motor units. The lack of an increase in diaphragm EMG suggests either that diaphragm fatigue was not severe enough to induce a detectable change in EMG or that recruitment of other respiratory muscles (37) is increased.

Because of the possibility that the diaphragm fatigue induced by 2 min of MIVV was not severe enough to significantly alter neural drive, we sought to increase the severity of fatigue by an IRL protocol. Although all subjects felt profound exhaustion after the three consecutive runs, the twitch Pdi reduction of 20% (range 13-26%) after loaded breathing was the same as that produced by 2 min of MIVV (22%, range 13-27%). It is of interest to consider why it is difficult to produce more severe fatigue. It has been suggested that human inspiratory muscles are resistant to fatigue. McKenzie and co-workers (24) reported that they had difficulty in producing diaphragm fatigue in normal subjects who breathed with 75 or 90% of maximal inspiratory pressure during resistive breathing trials. It has been recognized that fatigue is more difficult to induce in the human diaphragm than in the quadriceps. For example, diaphragm fatigue does not occur when the diaphragm contracts with a tension-time index of 0.18, whereas this tension-time index causes substantial quadriceps fatigue (35). Although the diaphragm is a skeletal muscle, central control of the diaphragm differs from that of limb skeletal muscles. McKenzie et al. (25) showed that central fatigue was more important in the diaphragm than in limb muscle. Bellemare and Bigland-Ritchie (4) found that central fatigue played an important role in the reduced performance of the diaphragm during IRL breathing. They also found that motor drive to the diaphragm progressively declined during repeated maximal efforts. In the present study, we found that the EMG amplitude measured from the esophageal electrode was reduced during IRL, as was Pdi, although the subjects were ostensibly making maximal efforts (Fig. 4). We also observed that all subjects could regenerate maximal EMG after several breathing cycles with reduced EMG. There were alternating maximal and submaximal EMG responses during IRL trials. Reduction of the diaphragm EMG suggests decreased central respiratory drive because IRL breathing does not cause failure of neuromuscular transmission (4). The reduction of neural drive to the diaphragm during IRL breathing may serve to protect the diaphragm from more severe peripheral fatigue. Indeed, it is difficult to intensify diaphragm fatigue. Our laboratory has shown that multiple 2-min MIVV trials do not produce more profound fatigue than does a single 2-min MIVV trial (8).

In conclusion, the diaphragm crus is relatively stable during CO2 rebreathing and there is a linear relationship between ventilation and RMS of the diaphragm EMG. This relationship does not change with diaphragm fatigue, at least of the magnitude induced in this study. The failure of diaphragm fatigue to reduce ventilation may be due, at least in part, to a sufficient reserve of ventilatory muscle capacity to compensate for the fatigue.


    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: Y. M. Luo, Respiratory Muscle Laboratory, King's College Hospital Bessemer Rd., London SE5 9PJ, UK.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 11 August 2000; accepted in final form 15 December 2000.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Aubier, M, Trippenbach T, and Roussos C. Respiratory muscle fatigue during cardiogenic shock. J Appl Physiol 51: 499-508, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Beck, J, Sinderby C, Lindstrom L, and Grassino A. Effects of lung volume on diaphragm EMG signal strength during voluntary contractions. J Appl Physiol 85: 1123-1134, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Beck, J, Sinderby C, Weinberg J, and Grassino A. Effects of muscle-to-electrode distance on the human diaphragm electromyogram. J Appl Physiol 79: 975-985, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Bellemare, F, and Bigland-Ritchie B. Central components of diaphragmatic fatigue assessed by phrenic nerve stimulation. J Appl Physiol 62: 1307-1316, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5.   Cohen, CA, Zagelbaum G, Gross D, Roussos C, and Macklem PT. Clinical manifestations of inspiratory muscle fatigue. Am J Med 73: 308-319, 1982[ISI][Medline].

6.   Daubenspeck, JA, Leiter JC, McGovern JF, Knuth SL, and Kobylarz EJ. Diaphragmatic electromyography using a multiple electrode array. J Appl Physiol 67: 1525-1534, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Derenne, JP, Couture J, Iscoe S, Whitelaw A, and Milic-Emili J. Occlusion pressures in men rebreathing CO2 under methoxyflurane anesthesia. J Appl Physiol 40: 805-814, 1976[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Duguet, A, Hart N, Luo YM, Moxham J, Green M, Similowski T, and Polkey MI. Effect of a maximal isocapnic ventilation on subsequent maximal isocapnic ventilation (Abstract). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159: A581, 1999.

9.   Elliott, MW, Mulvey DA, Moxham J, Green M, and Branthwaite MA. Domiciliary nocturnal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in COPD: mechanism underlying changes in arterial blood gas tension. Eur Respir J 4: 1049-1052, 1991.

10.   Esau, SA, Truwit J, and Rochester DF. Respiratory muscle rest. In: The Thorax, edited by Roussos C.. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1995, vol. 85, p. 2261-2300.

11.   Gandevia, SC, and McKenzie DK. Human diaphragmatic EMG: changes with lung volume and posture during supramaximal phrenic stimulation. J Appl Physiol 60: 1420-1428, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   Grassino, AE, Whitelaw WA, and Milic-Emili J. Influence of lung volume and electrode position on electromyography of the diaphragm. J Appl Physiol 40: 971-975, 1976[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Hamnegard, CH, Wragg S, Kyroussis D, Mills GH, Polkey MI, Moran J, Road J, Bake B, Green M, and Moxham J. Diaphragm fatigue following maximal ventilation in man. Eur Respir J 9: 241-247, 1996[Abstract].

14.   Hussain, SN, Simkus G, and Roussos C. Respiratory muscle fatigue: a cause of ventilatory failure in septic shock. J Appl Physiol 58: 2033-2040, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Kim, MJ, Druz WS, Danon J, Machnach W, and Sharp JT. Effects of lung volume and electrode position on the esophageal diaphragmatic EMG. J Appl Physiol 45: 392-398, 1978[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Laghi, F, D'Alfonso N, and Tobin MJ. Pattern of recovery from diaphragmatic fatigue over 24 hours. J Appl Physiol 79: 539-546, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

17.   Laghi, F, Jubran A, Parthasarathy S, Choe W, Segal J, and Tobin MJ. Can patients who fail a trial of weaning develop diaphragmatic fatigue (Abstract)? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161: A790, 2000.

18.   Lopata, M, Evanich MJ, and Lourenco RV. Quantification of diaphragmatic EMG response to CO2 rebreathing in humans. J Appl Physiol 43: 262-270, 1977[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19.   Lourenco, RV, Cherniack NS, Malm JR, and Fishman AP. Nervous output from the respiratory center during obstructed breathing. J Appl Physiol 21: 527-533, 1966[Free Full Text].

20.   Luo, YM, Lyall RA, Harris ML, Hawkins P, Hart N, Polkey MI, and Moxham J. Effect of lung volume on the oesophageal diaphragm EMG assessed by magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation. Eur Respir J 15: 1033-1038, 2000[Abstract].

21.   Luo, YM, Polkey MI, Johnson LC, Lyall RA, Harris ML, Green M, and Moxham J. Diaphragm EMG measured by cervical magnetic and electrical phrenic nerve stimulation. J Appl Physiol 85: 2089-2099, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Mador, MJ, Rodis A, Magalang UJ, and Ameen K. Comparison of cervical magnetic and transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation before and after threshold loading. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154: 448-453, 1996[Abstract].

23.   Mador, MJ, and Tobin MJ. The effect of inspiratory muscle fatigue on breathing pattern and ventilatory response to CO2. J Physiol (Lond) 455: 17-32, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24.   McKenzie, DK, Allen GM, Butler JE, and Gandevia SC. Task failure with lack of diaphragm fatigue during inspiratory resistive loading in human subjects. J Appl Physiol 82: 2011-2019, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

25.   McKenzie, DK, Bigland-Richie B, Gorman RB, and Gandevia SC. Central and peripheral fatigue of human diaphragm and limb muscles assessed by twitch interpolation. J Physiol (Lond) 454: 643-656, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

26.   Moxham, J, Morris AJR, Spiro SG, Edwards RHT, and Green M. Contractile properties and fatigue of the diaphragm in man. Thorax 36: 164-168, 1981[Abstract].

27.   Moxham, J, Wiles CM, Newham D, and Edwards RHT Sternomastoid muscle function and fatigue in man. Clin Sci Mol Med 59: 463-468, 1980.

28.   Mulvey, DA, Koulouris NG, Elliott MW, Laroche CM, Moxham J, and Green M. Inspiratory muscle relaxation rate after voluntary maximal isocapnic ventilation in humans. J Appl Physiol 70: 2173-2180, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

29.   Nava, S, and Bellemare F. Cardiovascular failure and apnea in shock. J Appl Physiol 66: 184-189, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

30.   Onal, E, Lopata M, and Evanich MJ. Effects of electrode position on esophageal diaphragmatic EMG in humans. J Appl Physiol 47: 1234-1238, 1979[Abstract/Free Full Text].

31.   Read, DJC A clinical method for assessing the ventilatory response to CO2. Australas Ann Med 16: 20-32, 1967[ISI][Medline].

32.   Schweitzer, TW, Fitzgerald JW, Bowden JA, and Lynne-Davies P. Spectral analysis of human inspiratory diaphragmatic electromyograms. J Appl Physiol 46: 152-165, 1979[Abstract/Free Full Text].

33.   Sieck, GC, Mazar A, and Belman MJ. Change in diaphragmatic EMG spectra during hypercapnia loads. Respir Physiol 61: 137-152, 1985[Medline].

34.   Smith, J, and Bellemare F. Effect of lung volume on in vivo contraction characteristics of human diaphragm. J Appl Physiol 62: 1893-1900, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].

35.   Vøllestad, NK, Sejersted OM, Bahr R, Woods JJ, and Bigland-Ritchie B. Motor drive and metabolic responses during repeated submaximal contractions in humans. J Appl Physiol 64: 1421-1427, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

36.   Watchko, JF, Standaert TA, Mayock DE, Twiggs G, and Woodrum DE. Ventilatory failure during loaded breathing: the role of central neural drive. J Appl Physiol 65: 249-255, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

37.   Yan, S, Lichros I, Zakynthinos S, and Macklem PT. Effect of diaphragmatic fatigue on control of respiratory muscles and ventilation during CO2 rebreathing. J Appl Physiol 75: 1364-1370, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].


J APPL PHYSIOL 90(5):1691-1699
8750-7587/01 $5.00 Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
Y. M. Luo, H. D. Wu, J. Tang, C. Jolley, J. Steier, J. Moxham, N. S. Zhong, and M. I. Polkey
Neural respiratory drive during apnoeic events in obstructive sleep apnoea
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2008; 31(3): 650 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. M. Romer and M. I. Polkey
Exercise-induced respiratory muscle fatigue: implications for performance
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2008; 104(3): 879 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
G J Gibson, A H Nickol, N Hart, N S Hopkinson, J Moxham, A Simonds, and M I Polkey
Improvement of respiratory failure with NIV.
Thorax, June 1, 2006; 61(6): 545 - 545.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
W.D-C. Man, J. Moxham, and M.I. Polkey
Magnetic stimulation for the measurement of respiratory and skeletal muscle function
Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2004; 24(5): 846 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luo, Y. M.
Right arrow Articles by Moxham, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luo, Y. M.
Right arrow Articles by Moxham, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online