|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584 CL Utrecht; 2 Department of Obstetrics, Neonatology and Gynecology, University Medical Center, 3584 EA Utrecht, The Netherlands; and 3 Department of Physiology, Institute for Animal Science and Animal Behavior, FAL, 31535 Neustadt/Rbge, Germany
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To test the hypothesis that an increasing opioid tonus is involved in decreases in fetal heart rate (FHR) and movement (FM) during late gestation, we studied the effects of intravenous bolus injections of morphine (1 mg) and naloxone (1 mg) on FHR and FM in the fetal pig. Twenty-one fetuses (1 per sow) were catheterized at 90-104 days of gestation (median 100 days). Recordings of FHR (electrocardiograph or Doppler-derived signals) and FM (ultrasonography) were made from 15 min before to 45 min after treatment. Morphine administration significantly decreased FHR, but it increased FHR variation and forelimb movements (LM). LM were clustered, and this stereotyped behavior has never before been observed in any mammalian fetus. Naloxone administration increased gross body movements and FHR without significant changes in FHR variation. It is concluded that FHR and motility are under opioidergic control in the pig fetus. Both morphine and naloxone induce hypermotility, suggesting that naloxone does not act as a pure opioid antagonist in the fetal pig.
fetus; opioids; motility; ultrasound
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CHANGES IN FETAL HEART RATE (FHR) and fetal movement (FM) are expressions of the development of the fetal nervous system. The mechanisms involved in the control of these vital fetal functions are of ample interest from both a scientific and clinical point of view. It has recently been reported that noninvasive monitoring of FHR (7) and FM (8) is feasible in the pig during late gestation. These studies revealed that basal FHR and the incidence of FM (percentage of time) decrease in the pig fetus during the last stage of gestation. A decrease in FHR and FM during late gestation has also been reported to occur in ovine (5, 13, 14), bovine (11, 15), equine (12, 16), and human (10, 25) fetuses. However, the physiological background of this phenomenon remains to be elucidated.
The role of the endogenous opioid system in the control of cardiovascular function and locomotion has been a subject of research in adults for many years (26, 27). In general a suppressive action on heart rate (22, 26) and stimulatory effects on locomotion (27) have been reported. By contrast, only a few fetal studies have focused on cardiovascular and behavioral effects of opioids and opioid antagonists. These studies are difficult to compare, and their results are rather controversial. For example, administration of opiate agonists to the fetal lamb increases FHR (36, 38), body and eye movements (39), and electrocortical and respiratory activities (6, 17, 18, 35) and disturbs sleep-wake organization (37). Interestingly, the administration of naloxone to fetal sheep caused an increase in FHR as well (1). Smotherman and Robinson (34) found that morphine increased fetal motility (arousal) in the rat, whereas naloxone had no effect.
To explore the involvement of the opioidergic system in the control of cardiovascular and kinetic mechanisms in the fetal pig, we characterized and quantified the effects of a nonspecific opioid-receptor agonist (morphine) and antagonist (naloxone) on basal FHR, FHR variation, and FM.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals. Twenty-one German Landrace sows (11-24 mo old) were kept in individual pens under controlled environmental conditions (temperature 20-22°C; lights on from 0600 to 1800). They received a standard diet twice daily (at 0630 and 1130) and had access to water ad libitum. Food was withheld from 12 h before to 12 h after surgery. Between 90 and 104 days of gestation (median: 100 days; term in this breed = 113 ± 1 days), one fetus per sow was chronically catheterized (n = 21) and 11 of them were also instrumented with electrocardiograph (ECG) electrodes.
Surgical procedures. Surgical procedures were followed as previously described (4). Sows were sedated with azaperone (2 mg/kg; Stresnil, Janssen) 30 min before the induction of general anesthesia by means of ketamine-hydrochloride (12 ml via an ear vein, ketamine; Atarost). A Silastic catheter was placed into the maternal external jugular vein and was only used for maintenance of anesthesia with ketamine hydrochloride. Lateral laparotomy was performed, and one fetal compartment of the uterus, just ventral to the incision, was exteriorized and opened. A Silastic catheter (Silastic Medical Grade, no. 602-155, 0.51 mm ID and 0.94 mm OD, Dow Corning, Midland, MI) was placed into the fetal jugular vein and tunneled to the neck of the fetus. In 11 fetuses in addition to the vascular catheter, ECG electrodes (silver bars soldered to copper wires) were placed subcutaneously on both sides of the thorax and fixed to the fetal skin. After intra-amniotic administration of 500 mg kanamycin (Albrecht, Aulendorf, Germany), the fetal membranes and uterine wall were closed with one suture and the uterus was placed back into the abdominal cavity. The fetal catheter and ECG wires were tunneled subcutaneously and exteriorized at the back of the sow. On the day of surgery and the 2 following days, all sows received a standard antibiotic therapy (2 x 106 IU penicillin and 2.5 g dihydrostreptomycin im; Tardomyocel, Bayer, Munich, Germany). Fetuses and dams were allowed to recover for 48 h before the experiments were started. Fetal catheters were flushed daily with 1 ml of saline and filled with 0.6 ml of saline containing 50 IU heparin (Kettelhack Riker, Borken, Germany) to keep them patent.
Experimental protocol.
Fetuses were randomly assigned to a morphine or naloxone treatment
group. The days of gestation on which FHR and/or FM recordings were
made in individual fetuses are presented in Table
1. FM and FHR could be recorded
simultaneously (i.e., around the same injection) in case of an
ECG-derived FHR signal, but, because of interference of the two
ultrasound systems, FM and Doppler-FHR recordings had to be performed
on separate occasions. Only three fetuses were assigned to the saline
group because their FHR and FM data did not differ from control fetuses
in previous studies (7, 8). All experiments were
performed by a single investigator. He was seated beside the sow during
monitoring and was not informed about the kind of treatment. To
eliminate possible diurnal variations, all experiments started at about
the same time of day (0800-0930). Recording of FHR or FM started
15 min before intravenous administration of a nonspecific opioid
agonist (morphine), nonspecific opioid antagonist (naloxone), or
saline, and the recording lasted for 60 min. Morphine hydrochloride and
naloxone hydrochloride (Sigma Chemical, Munich, Germany; 1 mg per
fetus, resulting in an approximate dose of 1 mg/kg, assuming a fetal
body weight of 1 kg at the time of injections) were dissolved in 0.5 ml
of saline. Pilot experiments with different doses (unpublished
observations) revealed that 1 mg/kg is the lowest effective
dose. To assess the physiological condition of the fetus,
blood samples (1 ml) were withdrawn at the start of each recording
session. Venous blood gases, pH, and hematocrit (Hct) were analyzed
using the blood-gas system 280 (Bayer Vital, Geschäftsbereich
Diagnostics, Fernwald, Germany), calibrated on the rectal temperature
of the sow on the day of experiment. Median (range) venous blood
PO2, PCO2, pH, and Hct at the beginning of the experiments were 20.7 Torr (18.0-22.7 Torr), 45.9 Torr (44.3-50.3 Torr), 7.41 (7.38-7.42),
and 25.9% (24.1-27.6%), respectively. These
values are considered to be within the normal range
(30).
|
Recording and analysis of fetal heart rate. Noninvasive (Doppler ultrasound) and invasive (ECG) FHR monitoring was performed as described previously (7). In short, the catheterized fetus was visualized and its heart localized by means of transabdominal ultrasonography (Scanner 200, Pie Medical, Maastricht, The Netherlands), using a 3.5-MHz linear-array back fat probe with a scanning field of 18 cm (width) by 16 cm (depth). Then, a 1.5-MHz Doppler transducer connected to a cardiograph (Meridian 800, Oxford Sonicaid, Abingdon, UK; paper speed 3 cm/min) was placed on the maternal abdominal wall over the fetal heart. In case of a fetus with ECG electrodes, the electrodes were connected to the same cardiograph. FHR was recorded using Doppler ultrasound if the ECG electrodes were nonfunctional. Once a good-quality FHR signal was obtained, a handheld computer (Psion Organizer LZ II, Psion PLC, London, UK) was programmed to acquire data for 60 min. Off-line, the stored data were fed into a personal computer running a software package developed for human FHR analysis (System 8002, Oxford Sonicaid, Abingdon, UK), with which we encountered no problems to analyze heart rate in the fetal pig. Numerical FHR analysis included calculation of basal FHR (in beats/min), long-term variation (LTV; in ms), and short-term variation (STV; in ms). LTV was calculated as the average of 1-min pulse interval differences (mean minute range), whereas STV is the average of 1/16th-min pulse-interval differences (9).
The 1-h recordings were divided into four periods of 15-min (1 period before and 3 periods after drug administration), and each period was analyzed separately. During the Doppler-FHR recordings, FMs felt by the observer's hand and movements of the sow were encoded with an event marker on the paper tracing, but they were not analyzed afterward.Recording and analysis of FM. FM recording and analysis were performed as described previously (8). In short, the catheterized fetus was localized by means of transabdominal ultrasonography, using the same equipment as described for localization of the fetal heart. A longitudinal section of the fetus was maintained for 60 min continuously, and the images were stored on videotape. Off-line, the tapes were analyzed for the presence of movements of the whole body (GM), isolated movements of the head (HM), isolated movements of a forelimb (LM), and rotation of the fetus along its longitudinal axis (Rot), using a specially designed software package (Poly 5, Inspector Research Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). A single investigator analyzed the tapes and was not informed about the kind of treatment. The recordings were split into four periods of 15 min each (1 period before and 3 periods after drug administration). The incidence of each movement pattern was expressed as a percentage of observation time (15 min). The sum of the four percent incidences per 15 min was also calculated [total fetal activity (TFA)].
Statistical analysis.
Because the data were not normally distributed they were expressed as
median and range or interquartile range (IQR), and nonparametric tests
were used. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare paired measurements,
the Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison of the three treatment groups,
and the Friedman test for repeated measurements within each group with
the Neuman-Keuls method for multiple comparison. The relationship
between two variables was studied with the Spearman test. Significant
differences were assumed at the level of P < 0.05 (2-tailed). To achieve optimal visual presentation in Figs. 1 and 3,
data were presented as means ± SE, but statistical significance was tested nonparametrically.
|
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The median values for gestation length, litter size, and the proportion of stillborn piglets were 113 days (range 111-115 days), 11 piglets (range 9-14 piglets), and 12% (range 8-14%), respectively, and these values did not differ significantly between the three treatment groups. The percentage of stillborn piglets was relatively high (8% on average in this herd) because, in addition to the noninstrumented fetuses, the instrumented fetuses also were allowed to be born vaginally and several of them were born dead. Median birth weight of the operated fetuses was 1.1 kg (range 0.9-1.2 kg) and was within the normal range of all litters born.
Effects of morphine and naloxone on FHR. A total of 29 1-h FHR recordings was obtained from 15 fetuses and used for analysis (Table 1). The quality of these recordings varied widely among the fetuses. Whenever an ECG signal was recorded (n = 10), signal loss (SL; percentage of recording time) was <0.5%, whereas the median SL was 45% (range 4-74%) for the Doppler ultrasound recordings (n = 20). Maternal movements and FMs were the major reasons for SL.
During the control period (
15-0 min), there were no significant
differences between the three treatment groups for any of the FHR
parameters (Kruskal-Wallis test). Saline injection had no significant
effect on FHR and its variation (Friedman test; Fig.
1). After morphine administration, FHR
decreased dramatically (P < 0.001) within 55 s
(median; IQR 30-80 s) and basal FHR remained reduced until 30 min
after injection (Fig. 1), whereas both LTV (P < 0.01)
and STV (P < 0.05) were increased for ~15 min
compared with pretreatment values (Fig. 1). Naloxone administration
resulted in a significant increase in FHR (P < 0.001)
within 48 s (median; IQR 20-90 s), whereas no significant
changes were observed in STV and LTV. The effect of naloxone on basal
FHR remained present until 45 min after the injection. There was no
significant relationship between the gestational age at recording and
the fetal responses to either drug (i.e., change in FHR 0-15 min
postinjection compared with control level; Spearman test). Examples of
the rapid changes in the FHR pattern after administration of morphine
and naloxone are presented in Fig. 2,
A and B, respectively. Basal FHR was negatively
correlated with LTV [Spearman rank correlation coefficient (rS)=
0.36, n = 30 animals,
P < 0.05] and STV (rS =
0.30, not significant) when all control periods were
regarded. During the first 30 min after drug
administration, however, only the correlation between basal FHR
and LTV in the naloxone group was statistically significant
(rS =
0.40, n = 17, P < 0.05).
|
Effects of morphine and naloxone on FM.
A total of thirty-two 1-h recordings of FM was obtained from 16 fetuses and used for analysis (Table 1). The quality of these recordings was good, with SL (% of recording time not suitable for
analysis) <15%. No significant differences were found among the
three treatment groups during the control periods (Kruskal-Wallis test;
Fig. 3). Saline injections caused no
significant changes in any movement pattern (Friedman test). Morphine
administration had no effect on GM, HM, and Rot, but it resulted in a
dramatic increase in LMs within 115 s (median; IQR 99-123 s)
after injection (Fig. 3). LMs were significantly increased until the
end of observation (Fig. 3) and occurred in clusters of 45-s duration
(median; IQR 24-65 s) alternating with epochs without LM (median
duration 110 s; IQR 51-240 s, Fig.
4). The increase in LM resulted in
a significant increase in TFA (Fig. 3). Administration of
naloxone increased the incidence of GM (P < 0.05),
which occurred within 115 s (median; IQR 99-123 s) after
injection (Fig. 3). Naloxone had no significant effect on either HM or
LM. Fetal rotations were rare, and their incidence was not affected by
any treatment (data not shown). There was no significant relationship
between the gestational age at recording and the fetal responses to
either drug (i.e., change in FM 0-15 min postinjection compared
with control level; Spearman test).
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results demonstrate that intravenous administration of morphine and naloxone had differential effects on basal FHR, FHR variation, and FM during late gestation in the pig.
Fetal age at treatment ranged from 92 to 114 days. Although the development of fetal pigs during late gestation is rapid, we could not find any statistically significant age effect in our results. We therefore considered the differences in fetal age in our study to be of minor importance. Mean birth weight of the catheterized fetuses was 1.1 kg (range 0.9-1.2 kg). Therefore, it could only be concluded at birth that the dose of 1 mg per fetus had been actually higher in some fetuses but lower in others than the envisaged dose of 1 mg/kg body wt.
Intravenous administration of 1 mg of morphine to the pig fetus induced
a rapid decrease in FHR, accompanied by increased LTV and STV. Naloxone
administration (1 mg iv) caused an immediate increase in FHR without
significant changes in LTV and STV. Available data on the effects of
opioids and their antagonists on FHR in other species are inconsistent.
Intramuscular administration of the opioid agonist pethidine (50 and 75 mg) (21) or fentanyl (31) to women during
labor diminished FHR variation for ~30 min. Naloxone administration
to pregnant women (0.4 mg iv) resulted in an increase in the number of
FHR accelerations (2). In contrast to our observations in
the pig, infusion of morphine (0.075-40 mg/h for 2-4 h) in
the fetal sheep induced tachycardia in a bell-shaped, dose-response
manner (42). However, Adamson et al. (1)
reported a rapid tachycardia in the fetal sheep after administration of naloxone (0.5 mg/kg as a bolus injection, followed by 1.3 mg · kg
1 · h
1 continuous iv
infusion), and these results are in accordance with the present study.
In another fetal sheep study (19), administration of a
µ-selective opioid peptide
[tyrosine-D-arginine-phenylalanine-lysine-NH2 (DALDA) 0.5 mg/kg iv] increased FHR gradually, reaching a peak between
50 and 70 min after administration and lasting for >120 min. When
DALDA was administered together with naloxone (6 mg/h) or propranolol
(
-adrenergic antagonist, 2 mg/h) no increase in FHR was observed,
suggesting that the tachycardiac response may be regulated via
sympathetic activation. Administration of the opiate agonist U-50,488H
to the fetal lamb increased the FHR immediately for a period of 15 min
(36). This increase was subsequently followed by
a prolonged decrease in FHR variability for up to 3 h.
Pretreatment with naloxone blocked the tachycardia but not the decrease
in FHR variation. All in all, these data indicate the involvement of
both opioidergic and nonopioidergic mechanisms. The autonomic nervous
system is especially well known to be a main regulator of fetal
cardiovascular functions (3, 33). Among the findings
mentioned above, only the results obtained by Adamson et al.
(1) are in agreement with our results. It is, however,
worth mentioning that in the fetal pig the
-receptor is virtually
absent until a few days after birth (20), whereas the
-receptor is the major opioid receptor in the fetal sheep (40).
A strong negative relationship between basal FHR and LTV or STV has been found in the human fetus (23, 24). A negative correlation between basal FHR and LTV has also been described in the pig fetus (7) and was confirmed in the present study in the pretreatment control recordings. Interestingly, this negative relationship was still present after drug administration but only in the naloxone group. The increase in basal FHR seen after naloxone administration was not accompanied by a significant decrease in FHR variation. FHR possibly reaches the physiological limit after naloxone injection and therefore further changes in FHR variation can only be limited.
Morphine administration (400 µg/h via a mini-osmotic pump in the
maternal flank) to fetal sheep induced fetal arousal and behavioral
state disturbance (37). Naloxone blocks or terminates fetal arousal in the sheep (18) but when administered to
near-term pregnant women (0.4 mg iv) an increase in fetal body
movements was seen (2). We found that intravenous
administration of 1 mg of morphine to the pig fetus induced an increase
in the incidence of LM, whereas the administration of naloxone (1 mg
iv) caused an increase in the incidence of GM. Interestingly, except
for the increase in FHR, naloxone does not exert effects different from
those of morphine in the pig. Such an apparent paradoxical action of
naloxone in the pig has already been described for other fetal
functions. Bolus administration of both morphine (1 mg) and naloxone (1 mg) resulted in impaired luteinizing hormone secretion in fetal and
neonatal pigs (4, 29). Whether these paradoxical effects
of naloxone are due to the absence of the
-receptor in the perinatal
period in the pig is not known (20, 28). However, it is
important to recognize that although morphine and naloxone induced an
increase in FM, the stimulated movement patterns were different in
nature. This suggests that morphine and naloxone act at different
receptors in the nervous system controlling FM.
An interesting phenomenon was observed after morphine administration. LMs not only increased in frequency but also they occurred in clusters (Fig. 4). Apart from direct observation of these LMs during ultrasound scanning, this clustering was also subjectively felt by the hand of the observer during Doppler FHR monitoring. This type of movement occurred in a stereotyped manner (i.e., repetitively and with no obvious function) and is abnormal because it was never seen in the saline-treated fetuses or in other pig fetuses (8). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a stereotyped behavior has been observed in a mammalian fetus.
The role of endogenous opioids in stereotyped behavior of adult sows
has been extensively studied (32). When a sow is tethered she develops stereotyped behavior within 1 mo, which is probably regulated via both µ- and
-receptors in the brain cortex
(41). Naloxone administration to a sow showing stereotyped
behavior reduces the total time spent on stereotyping, mainly by
reducing the mean duration of single bouts of stereotypes
(41). In the present experiment, morphine initiated
stereotyped behavior in the fetus by increasing the duration and
incidence of LM bouts.
In conclusion, our study demonstrates that an opioid tonus is present in the pig fetus during the last 3 wk of gestation and that opioids are apparently involved in controlling FHR and fetal kinetics. A more prolonged treatment with naloxone or more specific antagonists should disclose whether the previously observed decreases in FHR and FM occurring during late gestation (7, 8) can be influenced.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank the technical staff of the Department of Physiology (Institute for Animal Science and Animal Behaviour, FAL, Neustadt, Germany) for skillful and dedicated assistance. We also thank Pie Medical Equipment (Maastricht, The Netherlands) for providing the ultrasonographic equipment used in this study.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. A. M. Taverne, Dept. of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 7, 3584 CL, Utrecht, The Netherlands (E-mail: m.a.m.taverne{at}vet.uu.nl).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 16 February 2000; accepted in final form 16 October 2000.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Adamson, SL,
Patrick JE,
and
Challis JRG
Effects of naloxone on the breathing, electrocortical, heart rate, glucose and cortisol responses to hypoxia in the sheep fetus.
J Dev Physiol
6:
495-507,
1984[Web of Science][Medline].
2.
Arduini, D,
Rizzo G,
Dell'Acqua S,
Mancuso S,
and
Romanini C.
Effect of naloxone on fetal behavior near term.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
156:
474-478,
1987[Web of Science][Medline].
3.
Assali, NS,
Brinkman CR, III,
Woods R,
Dandavino A,
and
Numayhid B.
Ontogenesis of the autonomic control of cardiovascular functions in the sheep.
In: Fetal and Newborn Cardiovascular Physiology, , edited by Longo LD,
and Reneau DD.. New York: Garland, 1978, p. 47-91.
4.
Behrens-Herrler, S,
and
Parvizi N.
Long-term treatments with morphine and naloxone have sex-differentiated effects on luteinizing hormone secretion in chronically catheterized fetal pigs.
J Neuroendocrinol
4:
113-118,
1992.
5.
Boddy, K,
Dawes GS,
Fisher R,
Pinter S,
and
Robinson JS.
Foetal respiratory movements, electrocortical and cardiovascular responses to hypoxaemia and hypercapnia in sheep.
J Physiol (Lond)
243:
599-618,
1974
6.
Cheng, PY,
Wu D,
Soong Y,
McCabe S,
Decena JA,
and
Szeto HH.
Role of µ1-and
-opioid receptors in modulation of fetal EEG and respiratory activity.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
265:
R433-R438,
1993
7.
Cohen, S,
Mulder EJH,
van Oord HA,
Jonker FH,
van der Weijden GC,
and
Taverne MAM
Noninvasive monitoring of fetal heart rate during the last ten days of gestation in sows.
Am J Vet Res
58:
1285-1290,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
8.
Cohen, S,
Mulder EJH,
van Oord HA,
Jonker FH,
van der Weijden GC,
and
Taverne MAM
Ultrasound observations of fetal movements in the pig: an exploratory study.
Appl Anim Behav Sci
64:
153-158,
1999.
9.
Dawes, GS,
Moulden M,
and
Redman CW.
Improvements in computerized fetal heart rate analysis antepartum.
J Perinat Med
24:
25-36,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
10.
De Vries, JIP,
Visser GHA,
and
Prechtl HFR
The emergence of fetal behaviour. III. Individual differences and consistencies.
Early Hum Dev
16:
85-103,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
11.
Fraser, AF.
Some features of an ultrasonic study of bovine foetal kinesis.
Appl Anim Ethol
2:
379-383,
1976.
12.
Fraser, AF.
Fetal kinesis and a condition of fetal inertia in equine and bovine subjects.
Appl Anim Ethol
3:
89-90,
1977.
13.
Fraser, AF,
and
Broom DM.
Fetal behaviour.
In: Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare (3rd ed.). London: Bailliere Tindall, 1990, p. 198-207.
14.
Fraser, AF,
and
Robertson JG.
Pregnancy diagnosis and detection of fetal life in sheep and pigs by an ultrasonic method.
Br Vet J
124:
239-243,
1968[Web of Science][Medline].
15.
Ginther, OJ.
Fetus.
In: Ultrasonic Imaging and Animal Reproduction: Horses. Madison, WI: Equiservices Publishing, 1995, p. 223-227.
16.
Ginther, OJ.
Pregnancy: ultrasonic anatomy and research.
In: Ultrasonic Imaging and Animal Reproduction: Cattle. Madison, WI: Equiservices Publishing, 1998, p. 176-177.
17.
Hassan, SU,
Lee DS,
Gibson DA,
Nowaczyk BJ,
Cates DB,
Sitar DS,
Pinsly C,
and
Rigatto H.
Effect of morphine on breathing and behavior in the fetal sheep.
J Appl Physiol
64:
2058-2065,
1988
18.
Hassan, SU,
Pinsky C,
Cates DB,
Nowaczyk BJ,
Gobson DA,
and
Rigatto H.
The effects of naloxone on the changes in breathing and behavior induced by morphine in foetal sheep.
J Dev Physiol
14:
171-179,
1990[Web of Science][Medline].
19.
Holsey, YS,
Wu D,
Soong Y,
Omoniyi AT,
and
Szeto HH.
Cardiovascular effects of a µ-selective opioid agonist (tyrosine-D-arginine-phenylalanine-lysine-NH2) in fetal sheep: sites and mechanisms of action.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
180:
1127-1130,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
20.
Kahle, H,
and
Parvizi N.
Development of the opioid system in the pig.
In: Opioids in Farm Animals, edited by Parvizi N.. Münster, Germany: Landwirtschaftsverlag Münster, 1993, p. 167-180.
21.
Kariniemi, V,
and
Rosti J.
Intramuscular pethidine (meperidine) during labor associated with metabolic acidosis in the newborn.
J Perinat Med
14:
131-135,
1986[Web of Science][Medline].
22.
Kwok, EH,
and
Dun NJ.
Endomorphins decrease heart rate and blood pressure possibly by activating vagal afferents in anesthetized rats.
Brain Res
803:
204-207,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
23.
Mulder, EJH,
Derks JB,
and
Visser GHA
Antenatal corticosteroid therapy and fetal behaviour: a randomized study of the effects of betamethasone and dexamethasone.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol
104:
1239-1247,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
24.
Nijhuis, IJM,
ten Hof J,
Mulder EJH,
Nijhuis JG,
Narayan H,
Taylor DJ,
and
Visser GHA
Fetal heart rate in relation to its variation in normal and growth retarded fetuses.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
89:
27-33,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
25.
Nijhuis, IJM,
ten Hof J,
Mulder EJH,
Nijhuis JG,
Narayan H,
Taylor DJ,
Westers P,
and
Visser GHA
Numerical fetal heart rate analysis: nomograms, minimal duration of recording and intrafetal consistency.
Prenatal Neonatal Med
3:
314-322,
1998.
26.
Olson, GA
, Olson RD, and Kastin AJ Endogenous opiates: 1992.
Peptides
14:
1339-1378,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
27.
Olson, GA,
Olson RD,
Vaccarino AL,
and
Kastin AJ.
Endogenous opiates: 1997.
Peptides
19:
1791-1843,
1997.
28.
Parvizi, N.
Ontogeny of opiate receptor in the pig brain.
In: Fetal and Neonatal Development, edited by Jones CT.. New York: Perinatology Press, 1988, p. 238-240.
29.
Prunier, A,
Ellendorff F,
and
Parvizi N.
Opioid action on luteinizing hormone secretion in newborn pigs: paradoxical effects of naloxone.
J Dev Physiol
14:
221-227,
1990[Web of Science][Medline].
30.
Randall, GCB
Daily changes in the blood of conscious pigs with catheters in foetal and uterine vessels during late gestation.
J Physiol (Lond)
270:
719-731,
1977
31.
Rayburn, W,
Rathke A,
Leuschen MP,
Chleborad J,
and
Weidner W.
Fentanyl citrate analgesia during labor.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
161:
202-206,
1989[Web of Science][Medline].
32.
Schouten, W,
and
Rushen J.
The role of endogenous opioids in stereotyped behaviour and in heart rate response in pigs.
In: Opioids in Farm Animals, edited by Parvizi N.. Münster, Germany: Landwirtschaftsverlag Münster, 1993, p. 207-219.
33.
Segar, JL,
Merrill DC,
Smith BA,
and
Robillard JE.
Role of sympathetic activity in the generation of heart rate and arterial pressure variability in fetal sheep.
Pediatr Res
35:
250-254,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
34.
Smotherman, WP,
and
Robinson RS.
Prenatal experience with milk: fetal behaviour and endogenous opioid systems.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev
18:
347-357,
1992.
35.
Szeto, HH,
Cheng PY,
Dwyer G,
Decena JA,
Wu DL,
and
Cheng Y.
Morphine induced stimulation of fetal breathing: role of µ1-receptors and central muscarinic pathways.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
261:
R344-R350,
1991
36.
Szeto, HH,
Wu D,
Cheng PY,
Soong Y,
Taylor CC,
and
Yee J.
Cardiovascular and respiratory actions of U50,488H in the unanaesthetized ovine foetus.
Eur J Pharmacol
297:
77-82,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
37.
Szeto, HH,
Zhu YS,
Amione J,
and
Clare S.
Prenatal morphine exposure and sleep-wake disturbances in the fetus.
Sleep
11:
121-130,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
38.
Szeto, HH,
Zhu YS,
and
Cai LQ.
Central opioid modulation of fetal cardiovascular function: role of µ- and
-receptors.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
258:
R1453-R1458,
1990
39.
Umans, JG,
and
Szeto HH.
Precipitated opiate abstinence in utero.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
151:
441-444,
1985[Web of Science][Medline].
40.
Yang, KP,
and
Challis JRG
Opioid receptors are present in the hypothalamus but not detectable in the anterior pituitary of the developing ovine fetus.
Neuroendocrinology
53:
623-627,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
41.
Zanella, AJ,
Broom DM,
Hunter JC,
and
Mendl MT.
Brain opioid receptors in relation to stereotypes, inactivity, and housing in sows.
Physiol Behav
59:
769-775,
1996[Medline].
42.
Zhu, YS,
and
Szeto HH.
Morphine induced tachycardia in fetal lambs: a bell-shaped dose-response curve.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
249:
78-82,
1989
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |